Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Real-space topology and charge order in the Haldane-Holstein Model

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that in the Haldane–Holstein model at half-filling, increasing the electron–phonon coupling drives a first-order transition from a Chern insulator to a staggered charge-density wave, so that the many-body Bott index, the lo

desk verdict Unbiased DQMC phase diagram with dynamical phonons: a likely first-order CI-CDW transition, but the sign problem at the transition needs quantitative reporting before I'd swallow the details. read the letter →

arxiv 2602.09335 v2 pith:VO6YGDXV submitted 2026-02-10 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hall

Sebastião dos Anjos Sousa-Júnior , Julián Faúndez , Tarik P. Cysne , Richard T. Scalettar , Rubem Mondaini This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.mes-hall
keywords Haldane-HolsteinmodelCherninsulatorchargedensitywaveSemenoffmassdeterminantquantumMonteCarloBottindexlocalmarkerfirst-orderphasetransition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks how retarded electron–phonon interactions destabilize a Chern insulator. Using determinant quantum Monte Carlo, it finds that the Chern insulating ground state survives weak coupling but switches abruptly, through a first-order transition, into a staggered charge-density wave as the coupling g grows. The CDW acts as a spontaneously generated sublattice (Semenoff) mass, which closes and reopens the single-particle gap and removes the chiral edge states exactly where the topological markers lose their quantization. If correct, this establishes a concrete mechanism by which phonons can destroy Chern topology discontinuously, with measurable signatures in spectral and tunneling probes.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by three diagnostics used together: the many-body Bott index, the real-space local Chern marker built from the DQMC equal-time Green's function treated as an effective projector, and the staggered charge structure factor Sc. The topological markers establish which phase is a Chern insulator; Sc establishes when charge order is extensive. The conceptual link is the identification of the CDW with a dynamically generated Semenoff mass—a sublattice-staggered potential that breaks sublattice symmetry and thereby destroys the Haldane topology.

What would settle it

Compute the average sign and reweighted charge-structure-factor histograms at L = 15, T/t1 = 1/30, and g/t1 ≈ 1.6 with an order of magnitude more Monte Carlo sweeps; if the bimodal distribution or the abrupt energy drop disappears, or if the typical sign falls below roughly 0.1, the first-order CI–CDW transition claim is not established. A complementary check is to compare the Bott-index collapse with exact diagonalization or density-matrix-renormalization-group results on the same parameters, especially in the antiadiabatic limit.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the half-filled Haldane–Holstein model has two competing ground states—a Chern insulator at weak electron–phonon coupling and a staggered charge-density wave at strong coupling—separated by a first-order transition. For t2/t1 = 0.2 and ω0/t1 = 1 the transition sits at g/t1 ≈ 1.6. The evidence presented is simultaneous: the many-body Bott index and the real-space local Chern marker computed from the interacting Green's function remain nearly quantized below the transition and collapse above it; the staggered charge structure factor grows abruptly and becomes extensive; reweighted histograms of that structure factor are bimodal at the transition; the total energy drop

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that determinant quantum Monte Carlo remains statistically unbiased exactly where the average sign is smallest, at the transition; the paper's own data show a sign minimum there and do not report numerical sign values for the largest lattice, so if the sign problem is severe the first-order jump and reweighted histograms could be numerical artifacts.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At t2/t1 = 0.2 and ω0/t1 = 1, the Chern insulator is stable below g/t1 ≈ 1.6 and the staggered CDW above it, with no coexistence away from the transition point.
  • The transition is first order, evidenced by bimodal histograms, a sharp total-energy drop, and an energy-level crossing in the antiadiabatic limit.
  • The average determinant sign dips sharply at the CI–CDW boundary, so the sign itself can serve as a phase-boundary proxy across the g–t2 plane.
  • Increasing the phonon frequency shifts the critical coupling to larger g; in the antiadiabatic limit the CDW coexists with s-wave superconductivity, and in the adiabatic limit the mean-field critical λ ≈ 2 becomes exact.
  • Open-boundary simulations show chiral edge states below the transition and their disappearance above it, consistent with gap closing and reopening at the transition.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The largest system size (L = 15) is exactly where the average sign is lowest, so the most pronounced first-order signatures are also the least statistically controlled; a higher-statistics calculation at that size, or a comparison with a sign-problem-free method at the same parameters, would settle whether the jump is an artifact.
  • The Green's-function-based Chern marker is known to lose quantization near interacting topological transitions; the conclusion that the transition is topological therefore leans on the marker's reliability, and an independent many-body invariant would harden the claim.
  • If the mechanism is generic—any interaction that spontaneously generates a sublattice-staggered potential destroys a Chern insulator—then similar first-order CI-to-CDW transitions should appear in other honeycomb and moiré systems with strong electron-phonon coupling; this is testable in candidate TMD heterobilayers.
  • A concrete experimental fingerprint follows from the paper's own spectral and open-boundary results: at the transition, the edge-state LDOS and the bulk gap should vanish together while the sublattice charge imbalance jumps discontinuously, which could be seen by STM and angle-resolved photoemission in the same sample.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper presents a determinant quantum Monte Carlo (DQMC) study of the half-filled Haldane-Holstein model on a honeycomb lattice, with complex next-nearest-neighbor hopping t2=0.2t1 and phonon frequency ω0=t1. The central claim is that increasing electron-phonon coupling g drives an abrupt, first-order transition from a Chern insulator (CI) to a staggered charge-density wave (CDW), with the CDW acting as a dynamical sublattice (Semenoff) mass. The transition is identified at g/t1≈1.6 via the simultaneous collapse of the many-body Bott index and local Chern marker, a sharp rise in the charge structure factor, bimodal reweighted histograms of Sc, a drop in the total energy, and a minimum in the average fermion sign. Spectral functions and open-boundary LDOS are used to support gap closing/reopening and loss of edge states. The paper also maps the phase diagram in (t2/t1, g/t1) and in (λ, t1/ω0), with mean-field and exact-diagonalization checks in the adiabatic and antiadiabatic limits. The authors deposit their data and make no free-parameter fits.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, this is a valuable unbiased numerical demonstration that retarded electron-phonon coupling can destroy Chern topology via a first-order transition into a staggered CDW, with direct relevance to TMDs and layered quantum Hall systems. The combination of independent diagnostics — charge correlations, topological markers, spectral functions, and the fermion sign — is conceptually appealing, and the lack of fitted parameters is a strength. The paper also offers a falsifiable prediction: the average determinant sign dips precisely at the phase boundary, which is an interesting empirical observation consistent with earlier work. However, the statistical control of the DQMC simulation, especially at the transition point where the sign problem is worst, is not demonstrated quantitatively. Since the central first-order claim rests on histograms and energy drops at finite size, the significance will be fully established only after the missing error analysis and sign-problem validation are provided.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sign problem, Fig. 2(b)–(f), and SM “Additional data”] The central claim is not yet statistically supported because the sign problem at the transition is asserted to be mild but is never quantified. The paper reports no values of ⟨sign⟩, no error bars, no effective sample sizes, and no autocorrelation times. The data shown in Fig. 2(b) and the reweighted histograms in Fig. 2(d)–(f) are obtained precisely in the coupling window where the sign is minimal. If within a reweighted bin ⟨sign⟩ is small, the variance of P(Sc) becomes large and a bimodal shape can be produced by sign fluctuations correlated with Sc rather than by genuine phase coexistence. The SM admits that for ω0/t1=4 the sign problem forces βt1 to be halved, and that ω0/t1>4 is unfeasible; this makes the low-frequency claim load-bearing. I request a quantitative reporting of ⟨sign⟩, N_eff, and error bars for Sc/N, B, and C at every reported (L,T,g), and preferably a demonstration
  2. [First-order transition evidence: Fig. 2(a), (d–f); SM Figs. S3–S4] The claim of a first-order transition is based on bimodal histograms at a single size (L=12) and a single temperature (T/t1=1/10), a sharp energy drop in SM Fig. S4(b), and the rapid rise of Sc/N. These are suggestive but not conclusive. No Binder cumulant or histogram analysis is shown for more than one L; no finite-size extrapolation of the energy discontinuity is provided; no hysteresis or metastability is examined. The correlation ratio R_CDW in SM Fig. S3(b) shows a steep crossing, but this is also compatible with a very sharp continuous transition at this size. To support a first-order transition, the authors should show that the bimodal distribution persists and sharpens with increasing L, or provide a quantitative finite-size criterion for the discontinuity (e.g., the L-dependence of the double-peak separation or the extrapolated energy jump).
  3. [Eqs. (3)–(4): Green's-function-based topological markers] The Bott index and local Chern marker are computed by identifying the equal-time Green's function with the projector, P≈G. This is an uncontrolled approximation for an interacting, finite-temperature system; G is not a projector and can lose quantization even when the phase is topological. The paper cites Ref. [53] and acknowledges reduced quantization near the transition, but the central narrative that 'topology collapses' at the same coupling as CDW appears relies on this proxy. I would like to see a validation of the G-based marker on a small interacting system where exact diagonalization is possible, or a clearer statement of the accuracy of this approximation. Alternatively, a direct interacting topological invariant or a comparison with the spectral gap would strengthen the claim that the marker collapse is not an artifact of the projector approximation.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Throughout] No error bars are shown in any figure. Even if the statistical uncertainties are small, they must be reported to assess the reliability of the histograms and the energy drop.
  2. [Fig. 2(d)–(f)] The color scale for the average sign within each histogram bin is not shown. Add a colorbar so the reader can calibrate the reported effect.
  3. [SM captions] Typographical errors in the SM: 'change-density-wave' in Fig. S2 caption, 'electron-photon coupling' in Fig. S3 caption, and 'radio' instead of 'ratio' in Fig. S2 caption. These should be corrected.
  4. [Fig. 2(b) inset] The inset is not described in the caption. Specify what quantity is plotted (presumably Sc/N versus 1/L at fixed g) and its legend.
  5. [Fig. 4 and mapping to DMRG] The comparison with the DMRG critical point of Ref. [16] should be explained more explicitly: the mapping from Holstein to attractive Hubbard and then to repulsive Hubbard via the particle-hole transformation is stated, but the derivation of U_c/t1≈6.8 from the Holstein parameters (g, ω0) should be written out to avoid ambiguity.
  6. [Abstract and text] The abstract calls the study 'unbiased,' but DQMC with a complex weight is biased if the sign problem is uncontrolled. I suggest softening this wording to 'numerically exact up to statistical errors controlled by the sign' or similar.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the DQMC study uses independent observables (Sc, Bott index, Chern marker) with no fitted parameters; self-citations are methodological and not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are numerical results from DQMC, not a derivation from fitted inputs. The charge structure factor Sc (Eq. 2), the Bott index (Eq. 4), and the local Chern marker (Eq. 3) are independently defined observables computed from the same DQMC Green's functions; none is defined in terms of another, and the collapse of the topological markers near the CDW onset is not imposed by construction. The paper reports no fitted parameter that is later relabeled as a prediction; the critical couplings are obtained by standard finite-size scaling of Sc/N and correlation ratios, and the transition order is inferred from histograms and energy behavior. The main self-citations ([48,49,53]) concern the behavior of the fermion sign near quantum critical points and the use of Green's-function-based topological markers; these are methodology references, and the paper also displays its own sign data (Fig. 2b,c) and finite-size scaling, so the arguments do not reduce to the self-citations. The footnote [54] explicitly acknowledges that Green's-function markers can suffer reduced quantization near transitions, which is a limitation of the diagnostic but not a circular step. The sign-problem severity and reweighted-histogram variance concerns raised in the skeptic summary are statistical-correctness risks, not instances of definitional circularity. Overall, no load-bearing step reduces by construction to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free fitted parameters and no new entities. Its central numerical results rest on the DQMC framework (with the sign-problem assumption), the identification of G as a projector for topological markers, and standard mappings/mean-field limits for comparison.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Equal-time Green's function G can serve as a one-body density matrix P for computing Bott index and Chern marker in interacting systems.
    Used throughout (Eqs. 3-4) to diagnose topology; acknowledged in the text and Ref. [53] to suffer reduced quantization near transitions.
  • domain assumption The DQMC average sign remains sufficiently close to 1 in the low-frequency regime (ω0/t1 ≤ 4) to yield unbiased estimators for the quantities studied.
    The entire numerical phase diagram rests on this; the sign is shown to dip near gc but no values/errors are given.
  • standard math In the antiadiabatic limit (ω0→∞), the Holstein model maps exactly to the attractive Hubbard model.
    Standard Lang-Firsov/antiadiabatic mapping; used to compare with DMRG [16] and ED.
  • domain assumption The static mean-field approximation becomes exact in the adiabatic limit ω0→0.
    Standard for static phonons; used to place the λ_c~2 line in Fig. 4.
  • standard math A particle-hole transformation relates the attractive and repulsive Haldane-Hubbard models for purely imaginary next-nearest-neighbor hopping.
    Used in the SM to compare ED/Uc with DMRG results from Ref. [16].
  • domain assumption MaxEnt analytic continuation reliably reconstructs spectral functions from noisy imaginary-time QMC data.
    Spectral functions in Fig. 3 rely on this; known to be sensitive to noise.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Real-space topology and charge order in the Haldane-Holstein Model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VO6YGDXV

@misc{pith2026260209335,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Real-space topology and charge order in the Haldane-Holstein Model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VO6YGDXV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2602.09335}
}
read the original abstract

We study the half-filled Haldane-Holstein model, where a paradigmatic Chern insulator is coupled to fully dynamical phonons, and provide an unbiased characterization of how retarded electron-phonon interactions destabilize Chern topology. Using determinant quantum Monte Carlo, we find that increasing the coupling drives an abrupt, first-order transition from a Chern insulator to a staggered charge-density wave that acts as a dynamical sublattice (Semenoff) mass. The transition is simultaneously signaled by a nearly quantized many-body Bott index and a real-space local Chern marker constructed from the interacting Green's function, both of which collapse as the charge order parameter becomes extensive. Spectral and open-boundary calculations reveal concomitant gap closing and the loss of boundary spectral weight at the critical coupling. Despite the generic phase problem induced by broken time-reversal symmetry, we show that it remains mild in the low-frequency regime and that the average phase factor sharply tracks the Chern insulator-charge density wave boundary. Our results establish a concrete route by which electron-phonon coupling can trigger a discontinuous collapse of Chern topology and provide experimentally relevant signatures for correlated topological platforms.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.09335 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic picture of the Haldane model hopping [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (d) exhibits a single-peaked distribution centered at small Sc, while for g/t1 = 1.7 [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Phase diagram of the Haldane-Holstein model for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Results for open boundary conditions. Local density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Shiba duality and $\eta$-altermagnetism: Pairing and charge orders in bipartite attractive Hubbard models

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Shiba-dual attractive Hubbard models on bipartite lattices host η-altermagnetism, where Bogoliubov bands split by η-pseudospin with p-, d-, and f-wave structures.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [53]

    Paiva, Topological marker approach to an interacting Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model, Phys

    P.B.Melo, S.a.A.S.Júnior, W.Chen, R.Mondaini,and T. Paiva, Topological marker approach to an interacting Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model, Phys. Rev. B108, 195151 (2023)

    2023

  2. [1]

    D. J. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, M. P. Nightingale, and 6 M. den Nijs, Quantized Hall Conductance in a Two- Dimensional Periodic Potential, Phys. Rev. Lett.49, 405 (1982)

    1982

  3. [2]

    Parity Anomaly

    F. D. M. Haldane, Model for a Quantum Hall Effect without Landau Levels: Condensed-Matter Realization of the “Parity Anomaly”, Phys. Rev. Lett.61, 2015 (1988)

    2015

  4. [3]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Quantum Spin Hall Effect in Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 226801 (2005)

    2005

  5. [4]

    B. A. Bernevig and S.-C. Zhang, Quantum Spin Hall Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 106802 (2006)

    2006

  6. [5]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 3045 (2010)

    2010

  7. [6]

    R. B. Laughlin, Quantized Hall conductivity in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. B23, 5632 (1981)

    1981

  8. [7]

    C.XuandJ.E.Moore,StabilityofthequantumspinHall effect: Effects of interactions, disorder, andZ2 topology, Phys. Rev. B73, 045322 (2006)

    2006

Show all 79 references
  1. [8]

    Hohenadler and F

    M. Hohenadler and F. F. Assaad, Correlation effects in two-dimensional topological insulators, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter25, 143201 (2013)

    2013

  2. [9]

    Rachel, Interacting topological insulators: a review, Reports on Progress in Physics81, 116501 (2018)

    S. Rachel, Interacting topological insulators: a review, Reports on Progress in Physics81, 116501 (2018)

    2018

  3. [10]

    Hohenadler, T

    M. Hohenadler, T. C. Lang, and F. F. Assaad, Correlation Effects in Quantum Spin-Hall Insulators: A Quantum Monte Carlo Study, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 100403 (2011)

    2011

  4. [11]

    Hohenadler, Z

    M. Hohenadler, Z. Y. Meng, T. C. Lang, S. Wessel, A. Muramatsu, and F. F. Assaad, Quantum phase transitions in the Kane-Mele-Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B85, 115132 (2012)

    2012

  5. [12]

    C. N. Varney, K. Sun, M. Rigol, and V. Galitski, Interaction effects and quantum phase transitions in topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B82, 115125 (2010)

    2010

  6. [13]

    Zheng, G.-M

    D. Zheng, G.-M. Zhang, and C. Wu, Particle-hole symmetry and interaction effects in the Kane-Mele- Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B84, 205121 (2011)

    2011

  7. [14]

    W. Wu, S. Rachel, W.-M. Liu, and K. Le Hur, Quantum spin Hall insulators with interactions and lattice anisotropy, Phys. Rev. B85, 205102 (2012)

    2012

  8. [15]

    C. Shao, E. V. Castro, S. Hu, and R. Mondaini, Interplay of local order and topology in the extended Haldane- Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B103, 035125 (2021)

    2021

  9. [16]

    W.-X. He, R. Mondaini, H.-G. Luo, X. Wang, and S. Hu, Phase transitions in the Haldane-Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B109, 035126 (2024)

    2024

  10. [17]

    Maciejko and A

    J. Maciejko and A. Rüegg, Topological order in a correlated Chern insulator, Phys. Rev. B88, 241101 (2013)

    2013

  11. [18]

    Rüegg and G

    A. Rüegg and G. A. Fiete, Topological order and semions in a strongly correlated quantum spin Hall insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 046401 (2012)

    2012

  12. [19]

    A. G. Grushin, J. Motruk, M. P. Zaletel, and F. Pollmann, Characterization and stability of a fermionicν= 1/3fractional Chern insulator, Phys. Rev. B91, 035136 (2015)

    2015

  13. [20]

    Zhu, S.-S

    W. Zhu, S.-S. Gong, T.-S. Zeng, L. Fu, and D. N. Sheng, Interaction-driven spontaneous quantum Hall effect on a kagome lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 096402 (2016)

    2016

  14. [21]

    P. Mai, B. E. Feldman, and P. W. Phillips, Topological Mott insulator at quarter filling in the interacting Haldane model, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 013162 (2023)

    2023

  15. [22]

    A. H. Castro Neto, Charge density wave, superconductivity, and anomalous metallic behavior in 2D transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4382 (2001)

    2001

  16. [23]

    C.-S. Lian, C. Si, and W. Duan, Unveiling charge-density wave, superconductivity, and their competitive nature in two-dimensional NbSe2, Nano Letters18, 2924 (2018), pMID: 29652158

    2018

  17. [24]

    X. Xi, L. Zhao, Z. Wang, H. Berger, L. Forró, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Strongly enhanced charge-density-wave order in monolayer NbSe2, Nature Nanotechnology10, 765–769 (2015)

    2015

  18. [25]

    M. M. Ugeda, A. J. Bradley, Y. Zhang, S. Onishi, Y. Chen, W. Ruan, C. Ojeda-Aristizabal, H. Ryu, M. T. Edmonds, H.-Z. Tsai, A. Riss, S.-K. Mo, D. Lee, A. Zettl, Z. Hussain, Z.-X. Shen, and M. F. Crommie, Characterization of collective ground states in single- layer NbSe2, Natu...

    2015

  19. [26]

    X. Liu, Y. X. Chong, R. Sharma, and J. C. S. Davis, Discovery of a Cooper-pair density wave state in a transition-metal dichalcogenide, Science372, 1447 (2021)

    2021

  20. [27]

    Polshyn, Y

    H. Polshyn, Y. Zhang, M. A. Kumar, T. Soejima, P. Ledwith, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Vishwanath, M. P. Zaletel, and A. F. Young, Topological charge density waves at half-integer filling of a moiré superlattice, Nature Physics18, 42 (2022)

    2022

  21. [28]

    H. Pan, M. Xie, F. Wu, and S. Das Sarma, Topological Phases in AB-StackedMoTe 2/WSe2:Z 2 Topological Insulators, Chern Insulators, and Topological Charge Density Waves, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 056804 (2022)

    2022

  22. [29]

    Wilhelm, T

    P. Wilhelm, T. C. Lang, and A. M. Läuchli, Interplay of fractional Chern insulator and charge density wave phases in twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B103, 125406 (2021)

    2021

  23. [30]

    Sasmal, V

    S. Sasmal, V. Saini, S. Ramakrishnan, G. Dwari, B. B. Maity, J.-K. Bao, R. Mondal, V. Tripathi, S. van Smaalen, B. Singh, and A. Thamizhavel, Observation of multilayer quantum Hall effect in the charge density wave materialCaCu 4As2, Phys. Rev. Res.4, L012011 (2022)

    2022

  24. [31]

    Coissard, D

    A. Coissard, D. Wander, H. Vignaud, A. G. Grushin, C. Repellin, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, F. Gay, C. B. Winkelmann, H. Courtois, H. Sellier, and B. Sacépé, Imaging tunable quantum Hall broken-symmetry orders in graphene, Nature605, 51 (2022)

    2022

  25. [32]

    Weber, S

    F. Weber, S. Rosenkranz, J.-P. Castellan, R. Osborn, R. Hott, R. Heid, K.-P. Bohnen, T. Egami, A. H. Said, and D. Reznik, Extended phonon collapse and the origin of the charge-density-wave in 2H-NbSe2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 107403 (2011)

    2011

  26. [33]

    F. Tang, Y. Ren, P. Wang, R. Zhong, J. Schneeloch, S. A. Yang, K. Yang, P. A. Lee, G. Gu, Z. Qiao, and L. Zhang, Three-dimensional quantum Hall effect and metal–insulatortransitioninZrTe 5,Nature569,537–541 (2019)

    2019

  27. [34]

    F. Qin, S. Li, Z. Z. Du, C. M. Wang, W. Zhang, D. Yu, H.-Z. Lu, and X. C. Xie, Theory for the charge-density- wave mechanism of 3D quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 206601 (2020)

    2020

  28. [35]

    L. M. Cangemi, A. S. Mishchenko, N. Nagaosa, V. Cataudella, and G. De Filippis, Topological quantum transition driven by charge-phonon coupling in the Haldane Chern insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 046401 (2019)

    2019

  29. [36]

    Islam, K

    M. Islam, K. Bhattacharyya, and S. Basu, Electron- phonon coupling induced topological phase transition in 7 anα−T 3 Haldane-Holstein model, Phys. Rev. B110, 045426 (2024)

    2024

  30. [37]

    Holstein, Studies of polaron motion: Part I

    T. Holstein, Studies of polaron motion: Part I. The molecular-crystal model, Annals of Physics8, 325 (1959)

    1959

  31. [38]

    Blankenbecler, D

    R. Blankenbecler, D. J. Scalapino, and R. L. Sugar, Monte Carlo calculations of coupled boson-fermion systems. I, Phys. Rev. D24, 2278 (1981)

    1981

  32. [39]

    J. E. Hirsch, Discrete Hubbard-Stratonovich transformation for fermion lattice models, Phys. Rev. B28, 4059 (1983)

    1983

  33. [40]

    J. E. Hirsch, Two-dimensional Hubbard model: Numerical simulation study, Phys. Rev. B31, 4403 (1985)

    1985

  34. [41]

    S. R. White, D. J. Scalapino, R. L. Sugar, E. Y. Loh, J. E. Gubernatis, and R. T. Scalettar, Numerical study of the two-dimensional Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B40, 506 (1989)

    1989

  35. [42]

    R. R. dos Santos, Introduction to quantum Monte Carlo simulations for fermionic systems, Braz. J. Phys33, 63 (2003)

    2003

  36. [43]

    Assaad and H

    F. Assaad and H. Evertz, World-line and Determinantal Quantum Monte Carlo Methods for Spins, Phonons and Electrons, inComputational Many-Particle Physics, edited by H. Fehske, R. Schneider, and A. Weiße (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008) pp. 277–356

    2008

  37. [44]

    Gubernatis, N

    J. Gubernatis, N. Kawashima, and P. Werner,Quantum Monte Carlo Methods: Algorithms for Lattice Models (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2016)

    2016

  38. [45]

    T. A. Loring and M. B. Hastings, Disordered topological insulatorsviaC*-algebras,EurophysicsLetters92,67004 (2011)

    2011

  39. [46]

    Bianco and R

    R. Bianco and R. Resta, Mapping topological order in coordinate space, Phys. Rev. B84, 241106 (2011)

    2011

  40. [47]

    Chen, Universal topological marker, Phys

    W. Chen, Universal topological marker, Phys. Rev. B 107, 045111 (2023)

    2023

  41. [48]

    Mondaini, S

    R. Mondaini, S. Tarat, and R. T. Scalettar, Quantum critical points and the sign problem, Science375, 418 (2022)

    2022

  42. [49]

    Mondaini, S

    R. Mondaini, S. Tarat, and R. T. Scalettar, Universality and critical exponents of the fermion sign problem, Phys. Rev. B107, 245144 (2023)

    2023

  43. [50]

    The choiceit2 corresponds to the Haldane phaseϕ=π/2 [2]

  44. [51]

    See Supplemental Material [URL]

  45. [52]

    Zhang, W.-T

    Y.-X. Zhang, W.-T. Chiu, N. C. Costa, G. G. Batrouni, and R. T. Scalettar, Charge order in the Holstein model on a honeycomb lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 077602 (2019)

    2019

  46. [54]

    Other approaches to topological diagnostics in interacting systems were also previously explored [74–77]

    It is worth emphasizing that Green’s-function-based topological markers have been successfully employed in QMC simulations of correlated phases [71–73], but are known to suffer from reduced quantization near the topological phase transition. Other approaches to topological dia...

  47. [55]

    C. Chen, X. Y. Xu, Z. Y. Meng, and M. Hohenadler, Charge-density-wave transitions of Dirac fermions coupled to phonons, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 077601 (2019)

    2019

  48. [56]

    Andrei Bernevig, T

    B. Andrei Bernevig, T. L. Hughes, S.-C. Zhang, H.- D. Chen, and C. Wu, Band collapse and the quantum Hall effect in graphene, International Journal of Modern Physics B20, 3257 (2006)

    2006

  49. [57]

    T.-C.Yi, S.Cheng, I.Pilé, E.Burovski,andR.Mondaini, Two-dimensional polarized superfluids through the prism of the fermion sign problem, Phys. Rev. B110, 085131 (2024)

    2024

  50. [58]

    Schmid and M

    G. Schmid and M. Troyer, Melting of bosonic stripes, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 067003 (2004)

    2004

  51. [59]

    S. V. Isakov, S. Wessel, R. G. Melko, K. Sengupta, and Y. B. Kim, Hard-core bosons on the kagome lattice: Valence-bond solids and their quantum melting, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 147202 (2006)

    2006

  52. [60]

    S. a. d. A. Sousa-Júnior, N. C. Costa, and R. R. dos Santos, Half-filled extended Hubbard model on a square lattice: Phase boundaries from determinant quantum Monte Carlo simulations, Phys. Rev. B109, 165102 (2024)

    2024

  53. [61]

    Kennedy, S

    W. Kennedy, S. a. d. A. Sousa-Júnior, N. C. Costa, and R. R. dos Santos, Extended Hubbard model on a honeycomb lattice, Phys. Rev. B111, 155118 (2025)

    2025

  54. [62]

    R.N.Silver, D.S.Sivia,andJ.E.Gubernatis,Maximum- entropy method for analytic continuation of quantum Monte carlo data, Phys. Rev. B41, 2380 (1990)

    1990

  55. [63]

    K. S. D. Beach, Identifying the maximum entropy method as a special limit of stochastic analytic continuation (2004)

    2004

  56. [64]

    Huffman, Z

    F.F.Assaad, M.Bercx, F.Goth, A.Götz, J.S.Hofmann, E. Huffman, Z. Liu, F. P. Toldin, J. S. E. Portela, and J. Schwab, The ALF (Algorithms for Lattice Fermions) project release 2.0. Documentation for the auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo code, SciPost Phys. Codebases , 1 (2022)

    2022

  57. [65]

    Note thatKandK ′ need not be equivalent because time- reversal symmetry is broken

  58. [66]

    Trivedi and M

    N. Trivedi and M. Randeria, Deviations from Fermi- liquid behavior aboveT c in 2D short coherence length superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 312 (1995)

    1995

  59. [67]

    Zheng and J

    F. Zheng and J. Feng, Electron-phonon coupling and the coexistenceofsuperconductivityandcharge-densitywave in monolayer NbSe2, Phys. Rev. B99, 161119 (2019)

    2019

  60. [68]

    Taniguchi, K

    D.Lin, S.Li, J.Wen, H.Berger, L.Forró, H.Zhou, S.Jia, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, X. Xi, and M. S. Bahramy, Patterns and driving forces of dimensionality-dependent charge density waves in 2H-type transition metal dichalcogenides, Nature Communications11(2020)

    2020

  61. [69]

    Z. Wang, C. Chen, J. Mo, J. Zhou, K. P. Loh, and Y. P. Feng, Decisive role of electron-phonon coupling for phonon and electron instabilities in transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 013218 (2023)

    2023

  62. [70]

    dos Anjos Sousa-Júnior, Data haldane holstein qmc, 10.5281/zenodo.18570045 (2026)

    S. dos Anjos Sousa-Júnior, Data haldane holstein qmc, 10.5281/zenodo.18570045 (2026)

    2026 doi

  63. [71]

    H.-H. Hung, V. Chua, L. Wang, and G. A. Fiete, Interaction effects on topological phase transitions via numerically exact quantum Monte Carlo calculations, Phys. Rev. B89, 235104 (2014)

    2014

  64. [72]

    He, H.-Q

    Y.-Y. He, H.-Q. Wu, Z. Y. Meng, and Z.-Y. Lu, Topological invariants for interacting topological insulators. I. Efficient numerical evaluation scheme and implementations, Phys. Rev. B93, 195163 (2016)

    2016

  65. [73]

    He, H.-Q

    Y.-Y. He, H.-Q. Wu, Z. Y. Meng, and Z.-Y. Lu, Topological invariants for interacting topological insulators. II. Breakdown of single-particle Green’s 8 function formalism, Phys. Rev. B93, 195164 (2016)

    2016

  66. [74]

    H.-H. Hung, L. Wang, Z.-C. Gu, and G. A. Fiete, Topological phase transition in a generalized Kane-Mele- Hubbard model: A combined quantum Monte Carlo and Green’s function study, Phys. Rev. B87, 121113 (2013)

    2013

  67. [75]

    Gilardoni, F

    I. Gilardoni, F. Becca, A. Marrazzo, and A. Parola, Real- space many-body marker for correlatedz 2 topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B106, L161106 (2022)

    2022

  68. [76]

    Favata, D

    R. Favata, D. Piccioni, A. Parola, and F. Becca, Interaction-induced phases in the half-filled Bernevig- Hughes-Zhang model in one dimension, Phys. Rev. B 111, 155105 (2025)

    2025

  69. [77]

    Becca and A

    F. Becca and A. Parola, Many-body marker for three-dimensional topological insulators with inversion symmetry, Phys. Rev. B112, 075140 (2025)

    2025

  70. [78]

    Balay, S

    S. Balay, S. Abhyankar, M. F. Adams, J. Brown, P. Brune, K. Buschelman, L. Dalcin, A. Dener, V. Eijkhout, W. D. Gropp, D. Karpeyev, D. Kaushik, M. G. Knepley, D. A. May, L. C. McInnes, R. T. Mills, T. Munson, K. Rupp, P. Sanan, B. F. Smith, S. Zampini, H. Zhang, and H. Zhang, ...

    2019

  71. [79]

    Hernandez, J

    V. Hernandez, J. E. Roman, and V. Vidal, SLEPc: A scalable and flexible toolkit for the solution of eigenvalue problems, ACM Trans. Math. Software31, 351 (2005). 9 SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL Real-space topology and Charge Order in the Haldane-Holstein Model These Supplemental Mater...

    2005

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.