Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Bootstrapping form factor squared in ${\cal N}=4$ super-Yang-Mills

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The tree-level form factor squared in planar N=4 super-Yang-Mills, for up to six external legs, is completely fixed by two-point master diagrams, power counting, and the soft and multi-collinear limits.

desk verdict A genuinely new bootstrap for form factor squared, with solid N=3-5 results; N=6 is plausible but rests on an unproven ansatz and an undocumented BCFW check. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.07796 v1 pith:VOWPPC42 submitted 2025-06-09 hep-th

Song He , Xiang Li , Jingwen Lin , Jiahao Liu , Kai Yan This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords N=4super-Yang-Millsformfactorsquaredmasterdiagramsbootstrapsplittingfunctionsenergycorrelatorsplanarlimitrungrule
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the tree-level N-point form factor squared for the operator tr($phi^{2}$) in planar N=4 super-Yang-Mills can be bootstrapped directly into a local rational form, bypassing the usual step of computing form factors and then squaring them. For N=3,4,5,6, the entire object is encoded in 1, 2, 4, and 13 topologies of two-point master diagrams at (N-1) loops, whose numerators are fixed by power counting, the no-triangle property, and the rung rule. The coefficients are then fixed uniquely by the soft limit and the multi-collinear limit that reduces the object to the known 1-to-N splitting function; no unitarity cuts are needed. Cutting fewer than N propagators in the same master diagrams yields n-point form factor squared at (N-n) loops, so the collection unifies Sudakov form factors through four loops and three-point form factor squared through three loops. If correct, this provides compact integrands for energy correlators and a route to a graphical bootstrap for higher N.

What carries the argument

The central object is the two-point master diagram: a planar (N-1)-loop diagram whose two external legs are the two operator insertions, topologically equivalent to a propagator diagram. Cutting N propagators in a way that separates the two operators produces the N-point tree-level form factor squared; cutting n<N propagators produces the n-point form factor squared at (N-n) loops. The numerator ansatz is generated by the rung rule, which assigns a factor $(\ell_1+\ell_2)^2$ to each rung added between two propagators, and is pruned by the no-triangle/no-bubble power counting of N=4 SYM. In the periodic dual space, a cylinder with period q, cutting propagators becomes taking light-like limits of dual coordinates, which is how the unified integrand $I_N$ is evaluated.

What would settle it

Compute the six-point tree-level form factor squared at a generic kinematic point by an independent BCFW recursion (summing all helicity configurations) and compare numerically against the integrand built from the 59 contributing master diagrams; any discrepancy would show the ansatz missed a diagram or a coefficient.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the planar tree-level form factor squared, written $\bar F F_N^{(0)}$, is for N up to six exactly the set of N-propagator cuts of a small collection of two-point (N-1)-loop master diagrams. The master diagrams are trivalent planar one-particle-irreducible graphs with the two operator insertions, dressed with numerators generated by the rung rule and constrained by power counting; the resulting ansatz has 1, 2, 11, and 163 free parameters for N=3,4,5,6. Demanding that the multi-collinear limit reproduce the splitting function and that the soft limit reproduce the (N-1)-point result fixes all coefficients, with one N=6 coefficient fixed by the loop-level soft limit on a three-loop Sudakov form factor. The outcome is an explicit local integrand with only physical poles, checked numerically against BCFW recursion, and the same master diagrams automatically yield lower-point loop integrands: cutting n propagators gives $\bar F F_n^{(N-n)}$, unifying all form factors squared with a fixed N in one rational function.

Load-bearing premise

The whole N=6 result rests on the hand-listed set of master diagrams being complete; if any power-counting-allowed diagram is missing, the coefficients fixed by soft and collinear limits would be wrong, and the paper asserts rather than proves this enumeration.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The same master diagrams give the two-point Sudakov form factor integrand through four loops and the three-point form factor squared through three loops, without any additional calculation.
  • The six-point result supplies local integrands for the leading-order four-, five-, and six-point energy correlators, with explicit rational expressions in periodic dual coordinates.
  • The small topology counts (1,2,4,13) suggest a graphical bootstrap for form factor squared can be extended to higher N, potentially to N=9, mirroring the f-graph bootstrap for amplitude squared.
  • The three-point energy correlator admits a dlog basis of eleven weight-two forms that maps onto previously known functions, providing a starting point for loop integration.
  • From the four-point energy correlator onward, irreducible quadratic singularity surfaces intersect, so the paper classifies the resulting elliptic and higher-genus topologies into three types.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct next test would be applying the bootstrap at N=7; the paper's dual-space counting of 72 top topologies suggests the method's computational cost, and whether soft and collinear limits alone remain sufficient would be settled there.
  • The unification via $I_N$ hints that form factor squared may be the light-like limit of a yet-unknown two-point correlator, analogous to how amplitude squared arises from four-point correlators; the paper leaves this dual object open.
  • The classification of elliptic topologies implies that generic-angle energy correlators with N>=4 will require function spaces beyond polylogarithms, so bootstrapping their integrated forms will need new analytic tools.
  • Because the N=6 enumeration is asserted rather than proven, a graph-theoretic enumeration of all power-counting-compatible topologies would either certify the ansatz or reveal missing diagrams.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a bootstrap construction of the planar tree-level N-point form factor squared for the half-BPS operator tr(phi^2) in N=4 super-Yang-Mills. The object is represented by cutting N propagators of a collection of two-point master diagrams at (N-1) loops; the numerators are constrained by power counting, the no-triangle/no-bubble property, and the rung rule, and the remaining coefficients are fixed by the multi-collinear limit (reducing to known splitting functions) and by soft limits. The authors report that for N=3,4,5,6 the ansatz contains 1,2,4,13 top topologies, respectively, and that the resulting integrands unify lower-point loop integrands for FbarF_n at N-n loops. They also give a preliminary analysis of energy correlators, including a dlog basis for the three-point energy correlator and a classification of elliptic integral topologies for higher-point energy correlators.

Significance. If the construction is correct, the explicit local integrand for the six-point tree-level form factor squared is a new and useful result, and the master-diagram unification is a promising analogue of the f-graph bootstrap for amplitude squared. The paper has several concrete strengths: the N=3 and N=4 results reproduce known expressions; the N=5 coefficients are obtained completely and the resulting three-loop Sudakov form factor matches the literature after integral reduction; and the periodic dual-space formulation gives a clean way to package the results. The ancillary data, if complete and reproducible, would be a valuable resource for energy-correlator computations. The main weaknesses are that the central N=6 claim rests on an asserted, not proven, completeness of the ansatz, and that the only independent numerical check for N=6 is described in one sentence without enough detail to be verified.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 2.3 and Table 1] The completeness of the N=6 ansatz is load-bearing but not established. The text states that all 13 top topologies are obtained by adding rungs to N=5 master diagrams and that the sub-topologies are obtained by pinching propagators under power-counting constraints, but it does not prove that this enumeration exhausts all power-counting-compatible planar master diagrams, nor that no additional numerator monomials beyond those produced by the rung rule are needed. In particular, the numerator (q^2)^2 for the last topology in the first row of Fig. 12 is added by hand, with the justification that it is the only mass-dimension-two numerator that does not violate power counting; this uniqueness is asserted rather than demonstrated. Since the soft and multi-collinear constraints are not sensitive to all numerator combinations, a missing term in the ansatz could evade every imposed limit and still modify the result at generic kinematics. Please supply a proof of the enumeration, for example a graph-theoretic algorithm that generates all power-counting-compatible master diagrams for N=6, or an independent direct Feynman-diagram/generalized-unitarity computation at least for one nontrivial component.
  2. [Sec. 2.3 and Appendix A] The numerical BCFW check for N=6 is the only independent confirmation of the central new result, but it is not reported in a verifiable way. The paper only says that the result was checked by numerically comparing to a direct BCFW-recursion calculation, without specifying which helicity/color component was compared, at which kinematic points, with what precision, or how the comparison was implemented. Please provide these details, including at least one non-trivial component of FbarF_6 at several generic phase-space points, and make the verification code available together with the ancillary file, so that the claimed check can be reproduced.
  3. [Sec. 2.3, paragraph after Eq. (2.6)] The treatment of the remaining free parameters is not sufficient for the claim that the ansatz is completely fixed. The text states that after imposing all constraints there are still free parameters 'due to the linear relation among the master diagrams' and that the authors 'can choose the value of these parameters at will', yielding 59 contributing master diagrams. If the linear relations are genuine identities among the terms of the ansatz, then different choices may yield the same physical function after cutting, but this equivalence is not demonstrated. If they are not identities, the physical result may depend on the arbitrary choice. Please report the dimension of the remaining nullspace, prove that all representatives give identical results for all cuts (or, equivalently, provide a canonical set of coefficients with uniquely determined values), and clarify why the physical FbarF_6, rather than merely one representative, is fixed by the bootstrap constraints.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Table 1] The row labeled 'loop soft' lists 0 for all N, including N=6, but Sec. 2.3 states that a coefficient that is not fixed by the multi-collinear or tree-level soft limits is determined using the loop-level soft limit. Please clarify what the entries in this table count and make the table consistent with the text.
  2. [Eq. (1.4) and Sec. 3.3] The symbol FbarF_n^{(\ell)} is used both for the integrand and for the quantity obtained after cutting the master diagrams, and in the abstract and conclusions it is described as 'unifying FbarF_n at N-n loops'. This can be confusing because the same notation is also used for the integrated form factor squared elsewhere in the literature. Please introduce separate notation for the integrand-level object or state explicitly at each occurrence that only integrands are meant.
  3. [Sec. 2.2, Eq. (2.6)] The list of N=5 master diagrams includes diagrams whose final coefficients are zero (M_5^{(7)}, M_5^{(9)}, M_5^{(11)}). It would be helpful to state explicitly that these diagrams are part of the ansatz but drop out after the constraints are imposed, so that the reader does not infer an inconsistency between the diagram count and the number of nonzero coefficients.
  4. [Sec. 4.2] The classification of elliptic energy-correlator integral topologies is presented partly as a conjecture and partly as a series of statements that 'cannot be polylogarithmic'. Please make the logical status of each claim clearer, in particular which parts are proven and which are conjectural, and specify the assumptions under which the genus-1 or genus-2 curves are obtained.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the bootstrap constraints (splitting functions, soft limits, known lower-point checks) are external inputs or internal consistency conditions, not fitted versions of the claimed output.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained against external inputs and benchmarks. Coefficients for N=3,4,5 are fixed by the multi-collinear limit (Eq. 1.10) equating the form-factor-squared ratio to the known 1->N splitting function G_N from [21], which is derived from squared amplitudes, not from the form-factor-squared bootstrap itself. For N=6, all but one parameter are fixed by the same external multi-collinear constraint and the tree-level soft limit (Eq. 1.12); the last parameter is fixed using the loop-level soft limit (Eq. 1.13) compared with the 3-loop Sudakov FF obtained by cutting N=5 master diagrams, whose coefficients were already fixed externally. This is an internal consistency check within an independently anchored construction, not a circular fit. The master-diagram unification F̄F_n^{(ℓ)} = Cut_n I_{n+ℓ} is a definitional representation justified by Cutkosky rules, not an output fitted to itself. The rung-rule and power-counting ansatz is imported from known literature [85,89] as a construction rule; its completeness is a correctness risk, not circularity, and the final N=6 result is checked numerically against BCFW recursion (Appendix A), while lower-point results reproduce [19,64,94]. Self-citations to [21] and [28] are either to independent results or to outlook material, and do not carry the derivation in a circular way.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The bootstrap rests on standard factorization theorems plus two imported rules (rung rule, no-triangle) and an unproven completeness claim for the N=6 ansatz. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Residual ansatz coefficients for N=6 = chosen arbitrarily
    Linear relations among master diagrams leave free parameters in the ansatz (Sec 2.3). The authors state values can be chosen at will, yielding 59 contributing diagrams. These do not affect physical results.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Multi-collinear limit of FF squared reduces to the known 1 to N splitting functions (Eq 1.7, 1.10)
    Standard factorization theorem in gauge theories, used as a boundary condition to fix bootstrap coefficients.
  • domain assumption Soft limit of FF squared is universal and gives 2 times the (N-1)-point result (Eq 1.11, 1.12)
    Standard soft factorization imported as a constraint.
  • ad hoc to paper Rung rule constrains numerators of master diagrams (Sec 2, Fig 7)
    Empirical rule imported from amplitude squared bootstrap; used to prune the ansatz without derivation in this paper.
  • domain assumption Power counting and no-triangle/bubble rules in planar N=4 SYM (Sec 2, Fig 4)
    Well-established property of N=4 SYM integrands, used to restrict the ansatz.
  • ad hoc to paper Completeness of the N=6 ansatz: 13 top topologies plus sub-topologies exhaust all master diagrams (Sec 2.3)
    Asserted by enumeration, not proven. One numerator (q^2)^2 is added by hand. This is the load-bearing assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Bootstrapping form factor squared in ${\cal N}=4$ super-Yang-Mills." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VOWPPC42

@misc{pith2026250607796,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Bootstrapping form factor squared in $\cal N=4$ super-Yang-Mills},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VOWPPC42}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.07796}
}
abstract

We propose a bootstrap program for the {\it form factor squared} with operator ${\rm tr}(\phi^2)$ in maximally supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory in the planar limit, which plays a central role for perturbative calculations of important physical observables such as energy correlators. The tree-level $N$-point form factor (FF) squared can be obtained by cutting $N$ propagators of a collection of two-point ``master diagrams" at $(N{-}1)$ loops: for $N=3,4,5,6$ there are merely $1, 2, 4, 13$ topologies of such diagrams respectively, and their numerators are strongly constrained by power-counting (including ``no triangle" property) and other constraints such as the ``rung rule". Moreover, these two-point diagrams provide a ``unification" of FF squared at different numbers of loops and legs, which is similar to extracting (planar) amplitude squared from vacuum master diagrams (dual to $f$-graphs): by cutting $2\leq n<N$ propagators, one can also extract the planar integrand of $n$-point FF squared at $(N-n)$ loops, thus our results automatically include integrands of 2-point (Sudakov) FF up to four loops (where the squaring is trivial), 3-point FF squared up to three loops, and so on. Our ansatz is completely fixed using soft limits of (tree and loop) FF squared and the multi-collinear limit which reduces it to the splitting function, without any other inputs such as unitarity cuts. This method opens up the exciting possibility of a {\it graphical bootstrap} for FF squared for higher $N$ (which contains {\it e.g.} planar Sudakov FF to $N{-}2$ loops) similar to that for the amplitude squared via $f$-graphs. We also comment on applications to the computation of leading order energy correlators where new structures are expected after performing phase-space integrations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Hidden Permutation Symmetry of Squared Amplitudes in ABJM Theory

    hep-th 2025-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Squared ABJM amplitude integrands with fixed n+L are unified in a permutation-symmetric generating function, and a bipartite f-graph bootstrap yields new N=10 tree and loop results.

  2. Dissecting Parton Showers with Multi-Point Energy Correlators

    hep-ph 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Projections of four-point energy correlators cleanly separate spin from kinematic azimuthal correlations inside jets; spin effects are subdominant in accessible LHC kinematics.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

150 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    C. L. Basham, L. S. Brown, S. D. Ellis, and S. T. Love,Electron - Positron Annihilation Energy Pattern in Quantum Chromodynamics: Asymptotically Free Perturbation Theory, Phys. Rev. D17(1978) 2298

    1978

  2. [2]

    C. L. Basham, L. S. Brown, S. D. Ellis, and S. T. Love,Energy Correlations in electron - Positron Annihilation: Testing QCD,Phys. Rev. Lett.41(1978) 1585

    1978

  3. [3]

    C. L. Basham, L. S. Brown, S. D. Ellis, and S. T. Love,Energy Correlations in electron-Positron Annihilation in Quantum Chromodynamics: Asymptotically Free Perturbation Theory,Phys. Rev. D19(1979) 2018

    1979

  4. [4]

    C. L. Basham, L. S. Brown, S. D. Ellis, and S. T. Love,Energy Correlations in Perturbative Quantum Chromodynamics: A Conjecture for All Orders,Phys. Lett. B85(1979) 297–299

    1979

  5. [5]

    H. Chen, I. Moult, X. Zhang, and H. X. Zhu,Rethinking jets with energy correlators: Tracks, resummation, and analytic continuation,Phys. Rev. D102(2020), no. 5 054012, [arXiv:2004.11381]

    arXiv 2020

  6. [6]

    Kinoshita,Mass singularities of Feynman amplitudes,J

    T. Kinoshita,Mass singularities of Feynman amplitudes,J. Math. Phys.3(1962) 650–677

    1962

  7. [7]

    T. D. Lee and M. Nauenberg,Degenerate Systems and Mass Singularities,Phys. Rev.133 (1964) B1549–B1562. 36 [8]OP ALCollaboration, M. Z. Akrawy et al.,A Measurement of energy correlations and a determination of alpha-s (M2 (Z0)) in e+ e- annihilations at s**(1/2) = 91-GeV,Phys. Lett. B252(1990) 159–169. [9]ALEPHCollaboration, D. Decamp et al.,Measurement of...

    arXiv 1964

  8. [11]

    P. T. Komiske, I. Moult, J. Thaler, and H. X. Zhu,Analyzing N-Point Energy Correlators inside Jets with CMS Open Data,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023), no. 5 051901, [arXiv:2201.07800]

    arXiv 2023

Show all 150 references
  1. [12]

    H. Chen, I. Moult, J. Thaler, and H. X. Zhu,Non-Gaussianities in collider energy flux, JHEP07(2022) 146, [arXiv:2205.02857]. [13]CMSCollaboration,Measurement of energy correlators inside jets and determination of the strong coupling constant, 2023. [14]CMSCollaboration, A. Hay...

    2022 arXiv

  2. [16]

    D. M. Hofman and J. Maldacena,Conformal collider physics: Energy and charge correlations,JHEP05(2008) 012, [arXiv:0803.1467]

    2008 arXiv

  3. [17]

    A. V. Belitsky, S. Hohenegger, G. P. Korchemsky, E. Sokatchev, and A. Zhiboedov, Energy-Energy Correlations in N=4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett. 112(2014), no. 7 071601, [arXiv:1311.6800]

    2014 arXiv

  4. [18]

    J. M. Henn, E. Sokatchev, K. Yan, and A. Zhiboedov,Energy-energy correlation inN=4 super Yang-Mills theory at next-to-next-to-leading order,Phys. Rev. D100(2019), no. 3 036010, [arXiv:1903.05314]

    2019 arXiv

  5. [19]

    Yan and X

    K. Yan and X. Zhang,Three-Point Energy Correlator in N=4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022), no. 2 021602, [arXiv:2203.04349]

    2022 arXiv

  6. [20]

    Chicherin, I

    D. Chicherin, I. Moult, E. Sokatchev, K. Yan, and Y. Zhu,The Collinear Limit of the Four-Point Energy Correlator inN= 4Super Yang-Mills Theory,arXiv:2401.06463

    arXiv

  7. [21]

    S. He, X. Jiang, Q. Yang, and Y.-Q. Zhang,From squared amplitudes to energy correlators, arXiv:2408.04222

    arXiv

  8. [22]

    Chen, M.-X

    H. Chen, M.-X. Luo, I. Moult, T.-Z. Yang, X. Zhang, and H. X. Zhu,Three point energy correlators in the collinear limit: symmetries, dualities and analytic results,JHEP08 (2020), no. 08 028, [arXiv:1912.11050]

    2020 arXiv

  9. [23]

    Amati, R

    D. Amati, R. Petronzio, and G. Veneziano,Relating Hard QCD Processes Through Universality of Mass Singularities,Nucl. Phys. B140(1978) 54–72

    1978

  10. [24]

    Amati, R

    D. Amati, R. Petronzio, and G. Veneziano,Relating Hard QCD Processes Through Universality of Mass Singularities. 2.,Nucl. Phys. B146(1978) 29–49

    1978

  11. [25]

    R. K. Ellis, H. Georgi, M. Machacek, H. D. Politzer, and G. G. Ross,Factorization and the Parton Model in QCD,Phys. Lett. B78(1978) 281–284. 37

    1978

  12. [26]

    Catani and M

    S. Catani and M. Grazzini,Collinear factorization and splitting functions for next-to-next-to-leading order QCD calculations,Phys. Lett. B446(1999) 143–152, [hep-ph/9810389]

    1999 arXiv

  13. [27]

    J. L. Bourjaily, S. He, C. Shi, and Y. Tang,The Four-Point Correlator of Planar sYM at Twelve Loops,arXiv:2503.15593

    arXiv

  14. [28]

    S. He, C. Shi, Y. Tang, and Y.-Q. Zhang,The cusp limit of correlators and: anew graphical bootstrap for correlators/amplitudes to eleven loops,JHEP03(2025) 192, [arXiv:2410.09859]

    2025 arXiv

  15. [29]

    J. M. Drummond, J. Henn, V. A. Smirnov, and E. Sokatchev,Magic identities for conformal four-point integrals,JHEP01(2007) 064, [hep-th/0607160]

    2007 arXiv

  16. [30]

    J. M. Drummond, J. Henn, G. P. Korchemsky, and E. Sokatchev,Dual superconformal symmetry of scattering amplitudes in N=4 super-Yang-Mills theory,Nucl. Phys. B828 (2010) 317–374, [arXiv:0807.1095]

    2010 arXiv

  17. [31]

    Brandhuber, P

    A. Brandhuber, P. Heslop, and G. Travaglini,A Note on dual superconformal symmetry of the N=4 super Yang-Mills S-matrix,Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 125005, [arXiv:0807.4097]

    2008 arXiv

  18. [32]

    B. Eden, P. Heslop, G. P. Korchemsky, and E. Sokatchev,Constructing the correlation function of four stress-tensor multiplets and the four-particle amplitude in N=4 SYM,Nucl. Phys. B862(2012) 450–503, [arXiv:1201.5329]

    2012 arXiv

  19. [33]

    B. Eden, G. P. Korchemsky, and E. Sokatchev,From correlation functions to scattering amplitudes,JHEP12(2011) 002, [arXiv:1007.3246]

    2011 arXiv

  20. [34]

    B. Eden, P. Heslop, G. P. Korchemsky, and E. Sokatchev,Constructing the correlation function of four stress-tensor multiplets and the four-particle amplitude in n=4 sym, Nuclear Physics B862(2012), no. 2 450–503

    2012

  21. [35]

    R. G. Ambrosio, B. Eden, T. Goddard, P. Heslop, and C. Taylor,Local integrands for the five-point amplitude in planar N=4 SYM up to five loops,JHEP01(2015) 116, [arXiv:1312.1163]

    2015 arXiv

  22. [36]

    B. Eden, P. Heslop, G. P. Korchemsky, and E. Sokatchev,Hidden symmetry of four-point correlation functions and amplitudes in N=4 SYM,Nucl. Phys. B862(2012) 193–231, [arXiv:1108.3557]

    2012 arXiv

  23. [37]

    Brandhuber, B

    A. Brandhuber, B. Spence, G. Travaglini, and G. Yang,Form Factors in N=4 Super Yang-Mills and Periodic Wilson Loops,JHEP01(2011) 134, [arXiv:1011.1899]

    2011 arXiv

  24. [38]

    Brandhuber, O

    A. Brandhuber, O. Gurdogan, R. Mooney, G. Travaglini, and G. Yang,Harmony of Super Form Factors,JHEP10(2011) 046, [arXiv:1107.5067]

    2011 arXiv

  25. [39]

    Penante, B

    B. Penante, B. Spence, G. Travaglini, and C. Wen,On super form factors of half-BPS operators in N=4 super Yang-Mills,JHEP04(2014) 083, [arXiv:1402.1300]

    2014 arXiv

  26. [40]

    L. V. Bork,On NMHV form factors in N=4 SYM theory from generalized unitarity,JHEP 01(2013) 049, [arXiv:1203.2596]

    2013 arXiv

  27. [41]

    L. V. Bork,On form factors inN= 4SYM theory and polytopes,JHEP12(2014) 111, [arXiv:1407.5568]

    2014 arXiv

  28. [42]

    J. J. M. Carrasco,TASI 2014: lectures on gauge and gravity amplitude relations., in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: Journeys Through the Precision Frontier: Amplitudes for Colliders, pp. 477–557, WSP, 2015.arXiv:1506.00974. 38

    2014 arXiv

  29. [43]

    Z. Bern, J. J. Carrasco, M. Chiodaroli, H. Johansson, and R. Roiban,The duality between color and kinematics and its applications,J. Phys. A57(2024), no. 33 333002, [arXiv:1909.01358]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [44]

    Yang,On-shell methods for form factors inN= 4SYM and their applications,Sci

    G. Yang,On-shell methods for form factors inN= 4SYM and their applications,Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.63(2020), no. 7 270001, [arXiv:1912.11454]

    2020 arXiv

  31. [45]

    Arkani-Hamed, J

    N. Arkani-Hamed, J. L. Bourjaily, F. Cachazo, and J. Trnka,Local Integrals for Planar Scattering Amplitudes,JHEP06(2012) 125, [arXiv:1012.6032]

    2012 arXiv

  32. [46]

    Mastrolia and S

    P. Mastrolia and S. Mizera,Feynman Integrals and Intersection Theory,JHEP02(2019) 139, [arXiv:1810.03818]

    2019 arXiv

  33. [47]

    Mizera and A

    S. Mizera and A. Pokraka,From Infinity to Four Dimensions: Higher Residue Pairings and Feynman Integrals,JHEP02(2020) 159, [arXiv:1910.11852]

    2020 arXiv

  34. [48]

    Caron-Huot and A

    S. Caron-Huot and A. Pokraka,Duals of Feynman integrals. Part I. Differential equations, JHEP12(2021) 045, [arXiv:2104.06898]

    2021 arXiv

  35. [49]

    Caron-Huot and A

    S. Caron-Huot and A. Pokraka,Duals of Feynman Integrals. Part II. Generalized unitarity, JHEP04(2022) 078, [arXiv:2112.00055]

    2022 arXiv

  36. [50]

    De and A

    S. De and A. Pokraka,Cosmology meets cohomology,JHEP03(2024) 156, [arXiv:2308.03753]

    2024 arXiv

  37. [51]

    K. G. Chetyrkin and F. V. Tkachov,Integration by parts: The algorithm to calculate β-functions in 4 loops,Nucl. Phys. B192(1981) 159–204

    1981

  38. [52]

    R. N. Lee,Modern techniques of multiloop calculations, in49th Rencontres de Moriond on QCD and High Energy Interactions, pp. 297–300, 2014.arXiv:1405.5616

    2014 arXiv

  39. [53]

    Chen,Reduction of Feynman Integrals in the Parametric Representation,JHEP02 (2020) 115, [arXiv:1902.10387]

    W. Chen,Reduction of Feynman Integrals in the Parametric Representation,JHEP02 (2020) 115, [arXiv:1902.10387]

    2020 arXiv

  40. [54]

    Artico and L

    D. Artico and L. Magnea,Integration-by-parts identities and differential equations for parametrised Feynman integrals,JHEP03(2024) 096, [arXiv:2310.03939]

    2024 arXiv

  41. [55]

    A. V. Kotikov,Differential equations method: New technique for massive Feynman diagrams calculation,Phys. Lett. B254(1991) 158–164

    1991

  42. [56]

    A. V. Kotikov,Differential equation method: The Calculation of N point Feynman diagrams,Phys. Lett. B267(1991) 123–127. [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 295, 409–409 (1992)]

    1991

  43. [57]

    Remiddi,Differential equations for Feynman graph amplitudes,Nuovo Cim

    E. Remiddi,Differential equations for Feynman graph amplitudes,Nuovo Cim. A110 (1997) 1435–1452, [hep-th/9711188]

    1997 arXiv

  44. [58]

    J. M. Henn,Multiloop integrals in dimensional regularization made simple,Phys. Rev. Lett. 110(2013) 251601, [arXiv:1304.1806]

    2013 arXiv

  45. [59]

    M¨ uller-Stach, S

    S. M¨ uller-Stach, S. Weinzierl, and R. Zayadeh,Picard-Fuchs equations for Feynman integrals,Commun. Math. Phys.326(2014) 237–249, [arXiv:1212.4389]

    2014 arXiv

  46. [60]

    Adams, E

    L. Adams, E. Chaubey, and S. Weinzierl,Simplifying Differential Equations for Multiscale Feynman Integrals beyond Multiple Polylogarithms,Phys. Rev. Lett.118(2017), no. 14 141602, [arXiv:1702.04279]

    2017 arXiv

  47. [61]

    Dlapa, J

    C. Dlapa, J. Henn, and K. Yan,Deriving canonical differential equations for Feynman integrals from a single uniform weight integral,JHEP05(2020) 025, [arXiv:2002.02340]. 39

    2020 arXiv

  48. [62]

    Dlapa, J

    C. Dlapa, J. M. Henn, and F. J. Wagner,An algorithmic approach to finding canonical differential equations for elliptic Feynman integrals,JHEP08(2023) 120, [arXiv:2211.16357]

    2023 arXiv

  49. [63]

    Chicherin, R

    D. Chicherin, R. Doobary, B. Eden, P. Heslop, G. P. Korchemsky, L. Mason, and E. Sokatchev,Correlation functions of the chiral stress-tensor multiplet inN= 4SYM, JHEP06(2015) 198, [arXiv:1412.8718]

    2015 arXiv

  50. [64]

    R. H. Boels, B. A. Kniehl, O. V. Tarasov, and G. Yang,Color-kinematic Duality for Form Factors,JHEP02(2013) 063, [arXiv:1211.7028]

    2013 arXiv

  51. [65]

    Coleman and R

    S. Coleman and R. E. Norton,Singularities in the physical region,Nuovo Cim.38(1965) 438–442

    1965

  52. [66]

    I. A. Korchemskaya and G. P. Korchemsky,High-energy scattering in QCD and cross singularities of Wilson loops,Nucl. Phys. B437(1995) 127–162, [hep-ph/9409446]

    1995 arXiv

  53. [67]

    G. P. Korchemsky and A. V. Radyushkin,Infrared factorization, Wilson lines and the heavy quark limit,Phys. Lett. B279(1992) 359–366, [hep-ph/9203222]

    1992 arXiv

  54. [68]

    Kidonakis and G

    N. Kidonakis and G. F. Sterman,Resummation for QCD hard scattering,Nucl. Phys. B 505(1997) 321–348, [hep-ph/9705234]

    1997 arXiv

  55. [69]

    J. C. Collins, D. E. Soper, and G. F. Sterman,Soft Gluons and Factorization,Nucl. Phys. B308(1988) 833–856

    1988

  56. [70]

    L. J. Dixon, L. Magnea, and G. F. Sterman,Universal structure of subleading infrared poles in gauge theory amplitudes,JHEP08(2008) 022, [arXiv:0805.3515]

    2008 arXiv

  57. [71]

    S. M. Aybat, L. J. Dixon, and G. F. Sterman,The Two-loop soft anomalous dimension matrix and resummation at next-to-next-to leading pole,Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 074004, [hep-ph/0607309]

    2006 arXiv

  58. [72]

    Feige and M

    I. Feige and M. D. Schwartz,Hard-Soft-Collinear Factorization to All Orders,Phys. Rev. D 90(2014), no. 10 105020, [arXiv:1403.6472]

    2014 arXiv

  59. [73]

    Bern and G

    Z. Bern and G. Chalmers,Factorization in one loop gauge theory,Nucl. Phys. B447(1995) 465–518, [hep-ph/9503236]

    1995 arXiv

  60. [74]

    D. A. Kosower,All order collinear behavior in gauge theories,Nucl. Phys. B552(1999) 319–336, [hep-ph/9901201]

    1999 arXiv

  61. [75]

    Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, and D. A. Kosower,Two-loop g —>gg splitting amplitudes in QCD, JHEP08(2004) 012, [hep-ph/0404293]

    2004 arXiv

  62. [76]

    Catani and M

    S. Catani and M. Grazzini,The soft gluon current at one loop order,Nucl. Phys. B591 (2000) 435–454, [hep-ph/0007142]

    2000 arXiv

  63. [77]

    Becher and M

    T. Becher and M. Neubert,Infrared singularities of scattering amplitudes in perturbative QCD,Phys. Rev. Lett.102(2009) 162001, [arXiv:0901.0722]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 111, 199905 (2013)]

    2009 arXiv

  64. [78]

    Gardi and L

    E. Gardi and L. Magnea,Factorization constraints for soft anomalous dimensions in QCD scattering amplitudes,JHEP03(2009) 079, [arXiv:0901.1091]

    2009 arXiv

  65. [79]

    Catani and M

    S. Catani and M. H. Seymour,The Dipole formalism for the calculation of QCD jet cross-sections at next-to-leading order,Phys. Lett. B378(1996) 287–301, [hep-ph/9602277]. 40

    1996 arXiv

  66. [80]

    J. G. M. Gatheral,Exponentiation of Eikonal Cross-sections in Nonabelian Gauge Theories, Phys. Lett. B133(1983) 90–94

    1983

  67. [81]

    Frenkel and J

    J. Frenkel and J. C. Taylor,NONABELIAN EIKONAL EXPONENTIATION,Nucl. Phys. B246(1984) 231–245

    1984

  68. [82]

    G. F. Sterman,Infrared divergences in perturbative QCD,AIP Conf. Proc.74(1981) 22–40

    1981

  69. [83]

    Gardi and C

    E. Gardi and C. D. White,General properties of multiparton webs: Proofs from combinatorics,JHEP03(2011) 079, [arXiv:1102.0756]

    2011 arXiv

  70. [84]

    Gardi, J

    E. Gardi, J. M. Smillie, and C. D. White,On the renormalization of multiparton webs, JHEP09(2011) 114, [arXiv:1108.1357]

    2011 arXiv

  71. [85]

    Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, D. C. Dunbar, and D. A. Kosower,One loop n point gauge theory amplitudes, unitarity and collinear limits,Nucl. Phys. B425(1994) 217–260, [hep-ph/9403226]

    1994 arXiv

  72. [86]

    G. Lin, G. Yang, and S. Zhang,Full-color three-loop three-point form factors in N = 4 SYM,JHEP03(2022) 061, [arXiv:2111.03021]

    2022 arXiv

  73. [87]

    G. Lin, G. Yang, and S. Zhang,Color-kinematics duality and dual conformal symmetry for a four-loop form factor inN= 4 SYM,Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.67(2024), no. 4 241011, [arXiv:2112.09123]

    2024 arXiv

  74. [88]

    J. L. Bourjaily, A. DiRe, A. Shaikh, M. Spradlin, and A. Volovich,The Soft-Collinear Bootstrap: N=4 Yang-Mills Amplitudes at Six and Seven Loops,JHEP03(2012) 032, [arXiv:1112.6432]

    2012 arXiv

  75. [89]

    Z. Bern, J. S. Rozowsky, and B. Yan,Two loop four gluon amplitudes in N=4 superYang-Mills,Phys. Lett. B401(1997) 273–282, [hep-ph/9702424]

    1997 arXiv

  76. [90]

    O. T. Engelund and R. Roiban,Correlation functions of local composite operators from generalized unitarity,JHEP03(2013) 172, [arXiv:1209.0227]

    2013 arXiv

  77. [91]

    Z. Bern, M. Enciso, C.-H. Shen, and M. Zeng,Dual Conformal Structure Beyond the Planar Limit,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018), no. 12 121603, [arXiv:1806.06509]

    2018 arXiv

  78. [92]

    Chicherin, J

    D. Chicherin, J. M. Henn, and E. Sokatchev,Implications of nonplanar dual conformal symmetry,JHEP09(2018) 012, [arXiv:1807.06321]

    2018 arXiv

  79. [93]

    Bianchi, A

    L. Bianchi, A. Brandhuber, R. Panerai, and G. Travaglini,Dual conformal invariance for form factors,JHEP02(2019) 134, [arXiv:1812.10468]

    2019 arXiv

  80. [94]

    Bianchi, A

    L. Bianchi, A. Brandhuber, R. Panerai, and G. Travaglini,Form factor recursion relations at loop level,JHEP02(2019) 182, [arXiv:1812.09001]

    2019 arXiv

  81. [95]

    Kravchuk and D

    P. Kravchuk and D. Simmons-Duffin,Light-ray operators in conformal field theory,JHEP 11(2018) 102, [arXiv:1805.00098]

    2018 arXiv

  82. [96]

    Kologlu, P

    M. Kologlu, P. Kravchuk, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Zhiboedov,Shocks, Superconvergence, and a Stringy Equivalence Principle,JHEP11(2020) 096, [arXiv:1904.05905]

    2020 arXiv

  83. [97]

    Kologlu, P

    M. Kologlu, P. Kravchuk, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Zhiboedov,The light-ray OPE and conformal colliders,JHEP01(2021) 128, [arXiv:1905.01311]

    2021 arXiv

  84. [98]

    Fevola, S

    C. Fevola, S. Mizera, and S. Telen,Landau Singularities Revisited: Computational Algebraic Geometry for Feynman Integrals,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024), no. 10 101601, [arXiv:2311.14669]. 41

    2024 arXiv

  85. [99]

    Fevola, S

    C. Fevola, S. Mizera, and S. Telen,Principal Landau determinants,Comput. Phys. Commun.303(2024) 109278, [arXiv:2311.16219]

    2024 arXiv

  86. [100]

    Correia, M

    M. Correia, M. Giroux, and S. Mizera,SOFIA: Singularities of Feynman Integrals Automatized,arXiv:2503.16601

  87. [101]

    J. L. Bourjaily, H. Hannesdottir, A. J. McLeod, M. D. Schwartz, and C. Vergu,Sequential Discontinuities of Feynman Integrals and the Monodromy Group,JHEP01(2021) 205, [arXiv:2007.13747]

    2021 arXiv

  88. [102]

    Britto,Generalized Cuts of Feynman Integrals in Parameter Space,Phys

    R. Britto,Generalized Cuts of Feynman Integrals in Parameter Space,Phys. Rev. Lett.131 (2023), no. 9 091601, [arXiv:2305.15369]

    2023 arXiv

  89. [103]

    Dennen, I

    T. Dennen, I. Prlina, M. Spradlin, S. Stanojevic, and A. Volovich,Landau Singularities from the Amplituhedron,JHEP06(2017) 152, [arXiv:1612.02708]

    2017 arXiv

  90. [104]

    S. He, X. Jiang, J. Liu, and Q. Yang,On symbology and differential equations of Feynman integrals from Schubert analysis,JHEP12(2023) 140, [arXiv:2309.16441]. [Erratum: JHEP 04, 063 (2024)]

    2023 arXiv

  91. [105]

    Yang,Schubert problems, positivity and symbol letters,JHEP08(2022) 168, [arXiv:2203.16112]

    Q. Yang,Schubert problems, positivity and symbol letters,JHEP08(2022) 168, [arXiv:2203.16112]

    2022 arXiv

  92. [106]

    S. He, J. Liu, Y. Tang, and Q. Yang,Symbology of Feynman integrals from twistor geometries,Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.67(2024), no. 3 231011, [arXiv:2207.13482]

    2024 arXiv

  93. [107]

    S. He, Z. Li, R. Ma, Z. Wu, Q. Yang, and Y. Zhang,A study of Feynman integrals with uniform transcendental weights and their symbology,JHEP10(2022) 165, [arXiv:2206.04609]

    2022 arXiv

  94. [108]

    Arkani-Hamed and E

    N. Arkani-Hamed and E. Y. Yuan,One-Loop Integrals from Spherical Projections of Planes and Quadrics,arXiv:1712.09991

    arXiv

  95. [109]

    J. L. Bourjaily, A. J. McLeod, C. Vergu, M. Volk, M. Von Hippel, and M. Wilhelm, Embedding Feynman Integral (Calabi-Yau) Geometries in Weighted Projective Space,JHEP 01(2020) 078, [arXiv:1910.01534]

    2020 arXiv

  96. [110]

    Gong and E

    J. Gong and E. Y. Yuan,Towards analytic structure of Feynman parameter integrals with rational curves,JHEP10(2022) 145, [arXiv:2206.06507]

    2022 arXiv

  97. [111]

    Panzer,Algorithms for the symbolic integration of hyperlogarithms with applications to Feynman integrals,Comput

    E. Panzer,Algorithms for the symbolic integration of hyperlogarithms with applications to Feynman integrals,Comput. Phys. Commun.188(2015) 148–166, [arXiv:1403.3385]

    2015 arXiv

  98. [112]

    R. Ma, J. Gong, J. Lin, K. Yan, G. Yang, and Y. Zhang,Differential Equations for Energy Correlators in Any Angle,arXiv:2506.02061

    arXiv

  99. [113]

    J. L. Bourjaily, Y.-H. He, A. J. Mcleod, M. Von Hippel, and M. Wilhelm,Traintracks through Calabi-Yau Manifolds: Scattering Amplitudes beyond Elliptic Polylogarithms,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018), no. 7 071603, [arXiv:1805.09326]

    2018 arXiv

  100. [114]

    Broedel, C

    J. Broedel, C. Duhr, F. Dulat, and L. Tancredi,Elliptic polylogarithms and iterated integrals on elliptic curves. Part I: general formalism,JHEP05(2018) 093, [arXiv:1712.07089]

    2018 arXiv

  101. [115]

    Broedel, C

    J. Broedel, C. Duhr, F. Dulat, B. Penante, and L. Tancredi,Elliptic polylogarithms and Feynman parameter integrals,JHEP05(2019) 120, [arXiv:1902.09971]

    2019 arXiv

  102. [116]

    J. L. Bourjaily, N. Kalyanapuram, C. Langer, and K. Patatoukos,Prescriptive unitarity with elliptic leading singularities,Phys. Rev. D104(2021), no. 12 125009, [arXiv:2102.02210]. 42

    2021 arXiv

  103. [117]

    Frellesvig,On epsilon factorized differential equations for elliptic Feynman integrals, JHEP03(2022) 079, [arXiv:2110.07968]

    H. Frellesvig,On epsilon factorized differential equations for elliptic Feynman integrals, JHEP03(2022) 079, [arXiv:2110.07968]

    2022 arXiv

  104. [118]

    Broedel, C

    J. Broedel, C. Duhr, F. Dulat, B. Penante, and L. Tancredi,Elliptic Feynman integrals and pure functions,JHEP01(2019) 023, [arXiv:1809.10698]

    2019 arXiv

  105. [119]

    Leading Singularity

    J. L. Bourjaily, N. Kalyanapuram, C. Langer, K. Patatoukos, and M. Spradlin,Elliptic, Yangian-Invariant “Leading Singularity”,Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021), no. 20 201601, [arXiv:2012.14438]

    2021 arXiv

  106. [120]

    J. L. Bourjaily, P. Heslop, and V.-V. Tran,Amplitudes and Correlators to Ten Loops Using Simple, Graphical Bootstraps,JHEP11(2016) 125, [arXiv:1609.00007]

    2016 arXiv

  107. [121]

    Heslop and V.-V

    P. Heslop and V.-V. Tran,Multi-particle amplitudes from the four-point correlator in planar N= 4 SYM,JHEP07(2018) 068, [arXiv:1803.11491]

    2018 arXiv

  108. [122]

    Arkani-Hamed and J

    N. Arkani-Hamed and J. Trnka,The Amplituhedron,JHEP10(2014) 030, [arXiv:1312.2007]

    2014 arXiv

  109. [123]

    Arkani-Hamed, H

    N. Arkani-Hamed, H. Thomas, and J. Trnka,Unwinding the Amplituhedron in Binary, JHEP01(2018) 016, [arXiv:1704.05069]

    2018 arXiv

  110. [124]

    Dian and P

    G. Dian and P. Heslop,Amplituhedron-like geometries,JHEP11(2021) 074, [arXiv:2106.09372]

    2021 arXiv

  111. [125]

    He, C.-K

    S. He, C.-K. Kuo, Z. Li, and Y.-Q. Zhang,All-Loop Four-Point Aharony-Bergman-Jafferis-Maldacena Amplitudes from Dimensional Reduction of the Amplituhedron,Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022), no. 22 221604, [arXiv:2204.08297]

    2022 arXiv

  112. [126]

    He, Y.-t

    S. He, Y.-t. Huang, and C.-K. Kuo,The ABJM Amplituhedron,JHEP09(2023) 165, [arXiv:2306.00951]. [Erratum: JHEP 04, 064 (2024)]

    2023 arXiv

  113. [127]

    Coronado,Bootstrapping the Simplest Correlator in PlanarN= 4Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory to All Loops,Phys

    F. Coronado,Bootstrapping the Simplest Correlator in PlanarN= 4Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory to All Loops,Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020), no. 17 171601, [arXiv:1811.03282]

    2020 arXiv

  114. [128]

    Coronado,Perturbative four-point functions in planarN= 4SYM from hexagonalization,JHEP01(2019) 056, [arXiv:1811.00467]

    F. Coronado,Perturbative four-point functions in planarN= 4SYM from hexagonalization,JHEP01(2019) 056, [arXiv:1811.00467]

    2019 arXiv

  115. [129]

    A. V. Belitsky, L. V. Bork, A. F. Pikelner, and V. A. Smirnov,Exact Off Shell Sudakov Form Factor in N=4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023), no. 9 091605, [arXiv:2209.09263]

    2023 arXiv

  116. [130]

    A. V. Belitsky, L. V. Bork, and V. A. Smirnov,Off-shell form factor inN=4 sYM at three loops,JHEP11(2023) 111, [arXiv:2306.16859]

    2023 arXiv

  117. [131]

    A. V. Belitsky, L. V. Bork, J. M. Grumski-Flores, and V. A. Smirnov,Three-leg form factor on Coulomb branch,JHEP11(2024) 169, [arXiv:2402.18475]

    2024 arXiv

  118. [132]

    A. V. Belitsky and L. V. Bork,Off-shell minimal form factors,arXiv:2411.16941

    arXiv

  119. [133]

    L. J. Dixon and S. Xin,A two-loop four-point form factor at function level,JHEP01 (2025) 012, [arXiv:2411.01571]

    2025

  120. [134]

    L. J. Dixon, O. Gurdogan, A. J. McLeod, and M. Wilhelm,Bootstrapping a stress-tensor form factor through eight loops,JHEP07(2022) 153, [arXiv:2204.11901]

    2022 arXiv

  121. [135]

    L. J. Dixon, A. J. McLeod, and M. Wilhelm,A Three-Point Form Factor Through Five Loops,JHEP04(2021) 147, [arXiv:2012.12286]. 43

    2021 arXiv

  122. [136]

    D. J. Binder, S. M. Chester, S. S. Pufu, and Y. Wang,N= 4 Super-Yang-Mills correlators at strong coupling from string theory and localization,JHEP12(2019) 119, [arXiv:1902.06263]

    2019 arXiv

  123. [137]

    S. M. Chester,Genus-2 holographic correlator on AdS 5×S 5 from localization,JHEP04 (2020) 193, [arXiv:1908.05247]

    2020 arXiv

  124. [138]

    S. M. Chester, M. B. Green, S. S. Pufu, Y. Wang, and C. Wen,New modular invariants in N= 4 Super-Yang-Mills theory,JHEP04(2021) 212, [arXiv:2008.02713]

    2021 arXiv

  125. [139]

    Dorigoni, M

    D. Dorigoni, M. B. Green, and C. Wen,Exact properties of an integrated correlator inN= 4 SU(N) SYM,JHEP05(2021) 089, [arXiv:2102.09537]

    2021 arXiv

  126. [140]

    Dorigoni, M

    D. Dorigoni, M. B. Green, and C. Wen,Exact results for duality-covariant integrated correlators inN= 4SYM with general classical gauge groups,SciPost Phys.13(2022), no. 4 092, [arXiv:2202.05784]

    2022 arXiv

  127. [141]

    H. Paul, E. Perlmutter, and H. Raj,Integrated correlators inN= 4 SYM via SL(2,Z) spectral theory,JHEP01(2023) 149, [arXiv:2209.06639]

    2023 arXiv

  128. [142]

    Wen and S.-Q

    C. Wen and S.-Q. Zhang,Integrated correlators inN= 4 super Yang-Mills and periods, JHEP05(2022) 126, [arXiv:2203.01890]

    2022 arXiv

  129. [143]

    Brown, P

    A. Brown, P. Heslop, C. Wen, and H. Xie,Integrated correlators inN= 4SYM beyond localisation,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024), no. 10 101602, [arXiv:2308.07219]

    2024 arXiv

  130. [144]

    M. S. Bianchi,Protected and uniformly transcendental,JHEP09(2023) 121, [arXiv:2306.06239]

    2023 arXiv

  131. [145]

    Chang, M

    C.-H. Chang, M. Kologlu, P. Kravchuk, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Zhiboedov,Transverse spin in the light-ray OPE,JHEP05(2022) 059, [arXiv:2010.04726]

    2022 arXiv

  132. [146]

    H. Chen, H. Ruan, and H. X. Zhu,Energy-Energy Correlator at Hadron Colliders: Celestial Blocks and Singularities,arXiv:2505.16753

    arXiv

  133. [147]

    Herrmann, M

    E. Herrmann, M. Kologlu, and I. Moult,Energy Correlators in Perturbative Quantum Gravity,arXiv:2412.05384

    arXiv

  134. [148]

    G. P. Korchemsky, E. Sokatchev, and A. Zhiboedov,Generalizing event shapes: in search of lost collider time,JHEP08(2022) 188, [arXiv:2106.14899]

    2022 arXiv

  135. [149]

    A. V. Belitsky, S. Hohenegger, G. P. Korchemsky, E. Sokatchev, and A. Zhiboedov,Event shapes inN= 4super-Yang-Mills theory,Nucl. Phys. B884(2014) 206–256, [arXiv:1309.1424]

    2014 arXiv

  136. [150]

    A. V. Belitsky, S. Hohenegger, G. P. Korchemsky, E. Sokatchev, and A. Zhiboedov,From correlation functions to event shapes,Nucl. Phys. B884(2014) 305–343, [arXiv:1309.0769]

    2014 arXiv

  137. [151]

    A. B. Goncharov, M. Spradlin, C. Vergu, and A. Volovich,Classical Polylogarithms for Amplitudes and Wilson Loops,Phys. Rev. Lett.105(2010) 151605, [arXiv:1006.5703]

    2010 arXiv

  138. [152]

    Golden, A

    J. Golden, A. B. Goncharov, M. Spradlin, C. Vergu, and A. Volovich,Motivic Amplitudes and Cluster Coordinates,JHEP01(2014) 091, [arXiv:1305.1617]

    2014 arXiv

  139. [153]

    J. M. Drummond, G. Papathanasiou, and M. Spradlin,A Symbol of Uniqueness: The Cluster Bootstrap for the 3-Loop MHV Heptagon,JHEP03(2015) 072, [arXiv:1412.3763]

    2015 arXiv

  140. [154]

    Dennen, M

    T. Dennen, M. Spradlin, and A. Volovich,Landau Singularities and Symbology: One- and Two-loop MHV Amplitudes in SYM Theory,JHEP03(2016) 069, [arXiv:1512.07909]. 44

    2016 arXiv

  141. [155]

    L. V. Bork, D. I. Kazakov, and G. S. Vartanov,On MHV Form Factors in Superspace for \= 4SYM Theory,JHEP10(2011) 133, [arXiv:1107.5551]

    2011 arXiv

  142. [156]

    J. L. Bourjaily,Computational Tools for Trees in Gauge Theory and Gravity, arXiv:2312.17745. 45

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.