Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Near-Wall Scaling and Separation Prediction of a Rotation-Based Subgrid-Scale Stress Model

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2507.20043 v1 pith:VP55SIK3 submitted 2025-07-26 physics.flu-dyn

Near-Wall Scaling and Separation Prediction of a Rotation-Based Subgrid-Scale Stress Model

classification physics.flu-dyn
keywords modeleddyvelocityviscosityasymptoticbehaviornear-wallprediction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper presents an in-depth analysis of a novel subgrid-scale stress model proposed in 2022, which utilizes the rotational part of the velocity gradient as the velocity scale for computing eddy viscosity. This study investigates the near-wall asymptotic behavior and separation prediction capability of this model for the first time. Two canonical flows--fully-developed turbulent channel flow and periodic hill flow--are selected for analysis. The eddy viscosity predicted by this model correlates well with the visualized vortices and exhibits an asymptotic behavior of O(y) near the walls. The dimensionless eddy viscosity, like that of the Wall-Adapting Local Eddy Viscosity (WALE) subgrid model, remains within a small numerical range of 10^-2 to 10^-4. The power spectral density results reveal the asymptotic behavior of the velocity scale in the dissipation range, following a -10/3 scaling law. Additionally, this model predicts velocity profiles more accurately than the Smagorinsky model, even when using Van Driest damping. For the periodic hill case, this model predicts the reattachment point with only a 6.9% error, compared to 14.0% for the Smagorinsky model and 16.4% for the Smagorinsky model with Van Driest damping. In near-wall regions with separation, this model achieves even greater accuracy in Reynolds stress prediction than the WALE model, demonstrating its superior potential for separated flow simulations.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. PhysMiner: An Agentic AI Framework for Discovering Turbulence Physics

    physics.flu-dyn 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    An agentic framework combining triple velocity-gradient decomposition with LLM reasoning autonomously proposes and validates an improved SGS model for separated turbulent flow.