Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 47 references

On spectral stability of one- and bi-frequency solitary waves in Soler model in (3+1)D

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Soler-model solitary wave stability reduces to a family of radial operators.

desk verdict The one-frequency radial reduction is a genuine advance; the bi-frequency completeness gap is real but openly acknowledged, so this deserves refereeing with a request for fixes. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.21170 v1 pith:VPDYBJDV submitted 2024-12-30 math.AP math-phmath.MP

Nabile Boussaïd , Andrew Comech , Niranjana Kulkarni This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.APmath-phmath.MP MSC 35Q4135B3535C08
keywords SolermodelnonlinearDiracequationspectralstabilitysolitarywavesradialreductionsphericalharmonicsbi-frequencyspin-orbitoperator
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that spectral stability of solitary waves in the three-dimensional Soler model is exactly a radial problem. For a one-frequency solitary wave, the linearized Dirac operator splits the space of perturbations into invariant subspaces labeled by spherical-harmonic degree $\ell$ and azimuthal order $m$; any eigenvalue with nonzero real part must appear in one of the radial operators $A_{\ell,m}$ written in (3.15). The same decomposition is applied to bi-frequency solitary waves, yielding the reduced system (4.25)–(4.28); for polarizations parallel to $e_1$ the effective azimuthal order becomes $m'=(1+2\nu^2)m$, so increasing the frequency mismatch $\nu$ can lift the reduced system above the stability threshold of the one-frequency wave. The paper thus provides a route to numerical spectral computations in one radial variable for each angular sector.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the angular decomposition of four-component spinors via spherical harmonics and the spin-orbit operator $S = r\partial_r - r\alpha_r \alpha\cdot\nabla + \frac{n-1}{2}$, whose commutation relations (Lemmas B.2–B.5) make the Dirac operator act within each angular sector. The one-frequency linearization $L = D_0 + g\beta + 2g'\beta\varphi\,\mathrm{Re}(\varphi^*\beta\,\cdot) - \omega$ leaves the subspaces $X_{\ell,m}$ and $Y_\ell$ invariant; projecting onto a sector yields the radial operator $L_0(\omega)$ in (3.13) and the full reduced operator $A_{\ell,m}$ in (3.15). The companion Lemma 2.1 computes the coefficients $C_{\ell,m,k}$ that couple azimuthal orders, and in the parallel-polarization case these coefficients collapse to $-(|\xi|^2+|\eta|^2)m\,\delta_{m,k}$, producing the effective quantum number $m'=(1+2\nu^2)m$. The $Y_\ell$ sector is handled separately by a symmetric radial operator $A_{RS}$ whose spectrum is necessarily imaginary.

What would settle it

Compute the full linearized spectrum in three dimensions for a single one-frequency solitary wave at a frequency near $\omega_*\approx 0.936m$; any eigenvalue with nonzero real part that does not show up in one of the radial systems $A_{\ell,m}$ would disprove the claimed reduction. Equivalently, for a bi-frequency wave with $\xi$ and $\eta$ not parallel, solve the full linearization numerically and compare against the reduced system (4.25): a missing unstable mode would show that the non-parallel case is not covered.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the stability question for the Soler model in (3+1)D reduces to the spectra of the operators $A_{\ell,m}$ defined in (3.15) for one-frequency solitary waves, and to the analogue defined by (4.25)–(4.28) for bi-frequency waves. The reduction is achieved by exhibiting invariant subspaces $X_{\ell,m}$ and $Y_\ell$ whose elements have definite angular structure: upper and lower spinor components are built from spherical harmonics $h_{\ell,m}$ applied to fixed polarization vectors, with radial coefficients $A,B,P,Q$. The $Y_\ell$ subspace is shown to contribute only purely imaginary spectrum, so unstable eigenvalues must lie in the $X$-sector. For bi-frequency waves with $\xi$ and $\eta$ parallel to $e_1$, Lemma 2.2 makes the angular coupling diagonal, and the reduced operator coincides with the one-frequency operator with azimuthal order $m'=(1+2\nu^2)m$; this is the basis for the claim that bi-frequency waves can have stability properties the same as or better than one-frequency waves.

Load-bearing premise

The whole reduction rests on the completeness of the invariant-subspace decomposition, which the paper asserts by inspection for one-frequency waves and proves only for parallel polarizations in the bi-frequency case, leaving non-parallel bi-frequency waves an unproven assertion.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Spectral-stability checks for one-frequency Soler solitary waves reduce to solving the radial systems $A_{\ell,m}$ for $\ell\in\mathbb N_0$ and $0\le m\le\ell$; the $Y_\ell$ directions are automatically neutrally stable.
  • The eigenvalue $\lambda=-2\omega$ of geometric multiplicity two is forced by the $SU(1,1)$ symmetry and always sits in the spectrum; it does not by itself mean instability.
  • For bi-frequency waves with parallel polarizations, the effective azimuthal order is $(1+2\nu^2)m$, so a wave with large $\nu$ can have a stable reduced spectrum even if the corresponding one-frequency wave at the same $\omega$ is unstable.
  • In the parallel-polarization case every Schwartz-class perturbation is decomposed into the invariant subspaces, so no unstable eigenmode can hide outside the reduced systems.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One testable extension: run the same radial reduction for a Dirac–Klein–Gordon model with Yukawa coupling, which shares the $SU(1,1)$ symmetry; if the same angular algebra holds, bi-frequency stability comparisons should carry over.
  • For non-parallel $\xi,\eta$, the coupling matrix $C_{m,k}$ mixes azimuthal orders instead of merely rescaling $m$; a finite-dimensional angular calculation would show whether the large-$\nu$ stability gain survives away from the parallel case.
  • The reduction suggests a practical numerical protocol: discretize only the radial variable in each sector and compare against a full 3D spectral computation; agreement would close the completeness gap left by the 'by inspection' lemma.
  • The observed threshold $\omega_*\approx 0.936m$ from radial numerics becomes a prediction for every angular sector: if the reduced operators are computed for all $\ell,m$, the threshold should be the same.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper develops a radial reduction of the linearized Soler model in (3+1) dimensions around one-frequency and bi-frequency solitary waves. For one-frequency waves, the authors exhibit invariant subspaces X_{l,m} and Y_l labeled by spherical harmonics, derive the reduced radial systems (3.11)-(3.15), and claim that spectral stability reduces to studying the radial operators A_{l,m}. For bi-frequency waves, they introduce analogous invariant subspaces X_l and Y_l, derive the reduced system (4.25) and its aligned special case (4.28), and argue via Remark 4.2 that bi-frequency waves may have stability comparable to or better than one-frequency waves. The paper is largely self-contained, with detailed algebraic derivations and appendices on spherical harmonics and the spin-orbit operator.

Significance. If the reduction is complete, this is a significant technical contribution: it is the first systematic reduction of the spectral stability problem for 3D Soler solitary waves to one-dimensional radial systems, enabling numerical computation of spectra for perturbations of arbitrary angular structure. The derivations are explicit and parameter-free, and the appendices provide useful identities for the spin-orbit operator. The one-frequency reduction and the aligned bi-frequency reduction are plausible and well-documented. However, the completeness of the invariant subspace decomposition is not established for the generic non-parallel bi-frequency case, which is exactly the novel regime not reachable by the SU(1,1) symmetry, so the central claim for bi-frequency waves is not fully supported as stated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 5, Lemma 5.1 and Theorem 4.1] The completeness of the invariant subspaces for bi-frequency waves is proven only when ξ and η are parallel to e1. Theorem 4.1 is stated with ξ parallel to e1 and arbitrary η, and the paragraph preceding it announces a decomposition δ for general ξ, η, but no proof of surjectivity is given for the non-parallel case. The non-parallel, non-orthogonal pair (ξ,η) is precisely the generic case that cannot be obtained from a one-frequency solitary wave by an SU(1,1) transformation, and it is the case in which the claimed improvement of stability would be new. If for such η there is an L^2 perturbation outside X_l ⊕ Y_l, the reduced system (4.26)–(4.28) would miss the corresponding eigenmode. This gap is load-bearing for the central claim that spectral stability reduces to the radial operators, so the bi-frequency reduction is incomplete for the generic case.
  2. [Lemma 3.2] The one-frequency reduction rests on the assertion that the union of the invariant subspaces X_{l,m} and Y_l spans L^2(R^3,C^4). The proof of Lemma 3.2 is given as 'The above lemma follows by inspection.' Given that this completeness is what excludes all other spectral directions, this is not a trivial statement; a detailed proof or a precise reference to a standard expansion in spinor spherical harmonics is needed. Without it, the reduction to the operators A_{l,m} is not fully justified.
  3. [Eq. (4.25)] The second line of the system (4.25) reads i∂t P^h = −(A' + κ_l/r^2 B + (g−ω)P)h − 2g' u Re(...). However, the derivation from (4.14) and the analogous one-frequency system (3.11) give the coefficient −(g+ω)P, not −(g−ω)P. This sign error changes the reduced operator and would propagate to (4.28) and Remark 4.2, so it must be corrected.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] The abstract and introduction state that the technique is applied to bi-frequency solitary waves without qualification, whereas the completeness proof is restricted to the aligned case. Please add a caveat or adjust the claims accordingly.
  2. [Remark 4.2] The improved-stability statement is conditional on a spectral pattern observed numerically in (2+1)D, not proved in 3D. The remark should state explicitly that this is a heuristic transfer of a (2+1)D numerical observation, not a theorem in the present setting.
  3. [Lemma 3.2 and Lemma 5.1] The radial functions A_{l,m}, B_{l,m}, etc. are said to belong to S(R^3,C^4), but they are functions of r only; this should be S(R_+) or similar.
  4. [Eq. (4.25)] The system (4.25) uses the symbol (3−n)/r without defining n in Section 4; since the paper is set in n=3, the term vanishes and can be omitted or n should be specified.
  5. [Lemma 5.1] In the proof of Lemma 5.1, the coefficients k_{l,m} are introduced without an explicit formula; please provide their definition or a reference.
  6. [Eq. (4.7)] There is a parenthesis mismatch in the display: 'σrΣ¯hℓ,m)η' should be 'σrΣ(¯hℓ,mη)' or similar.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the radial reduction is a direct invariant-subspace computation; cited prior results are used as inputs, not to force the stability conclusion.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation—reducing spectral stability of one- and bi-frequency solitary waves to the spectra of the radial operators Aℓ,m and of the system (4.25)–(4.28)—is a direct computation of invariant subspaces of the linearized operator. No parameter is fitted to data and then renamed as a prediction; the operators L0, W, and Cm,k are obtained by explicit algebraic manipulation of the linearized equation. Self-citations appear as contextual inputs: [BC18] supplies the existence and parametrization of bi-frequency solitary waves, and [CMKS+16] supplies a numerical spectral pattern used only in the conditional Remark 4.2 (an if-then statement, not an asserted stability theorem). Neither citation defines the target conclusion. In particular, the claim that stability reduces to spectra of Aℓ,m does not presuppose stability; it follows from the invariance calculation and the decomposition lemma. The skeptical concerns about Lemma 3.2's proof by inspection and about completeness of Xℓ⊕Yℓ in the non-parallel bi-frequency case are legitimate rigor/completeness gaps, but they are not circularity: a missing proof that the invariant subspaces cover all perturbations is not an argument that assumes what it derives. The derivation is self-contained against the stated algebraic identities (Lemmas 2.1, 2.2, B.2, B.3), and no load-bearing step reduces to its own input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new fitted parameters or postulated entities. It relies on standard mathematical facts and on prior existence results for the solitary waves being studied. The key unproved-in-this-paper input is the bi-frequency ansatz from [BC18].

assumptions (4)
  • standard math Standard identities for Dirac matrices and spherical harmonics, including the spin-orbit operator properties.
    Used throughout, for example in Lemmas B.2-B.5 and the spherical harmonic definitions in Appendix A.
  • domain assumption Existence of one-frequency solitary wave solutions (v,u) to the radial ODE system.
    Taken from prior work [ES95, BC17]; the paper's analysis is linearization around such waves.
  • domain assumption The bi-frequency solitary wave ansatz (4.2) is an exact solution for any ξ,η with |ξ|²-|η|²=1.
    Taken from [BC18]; this underpins the entire Section 4 analysis.
  • domain assumption Spectral stability is defined through the complexified linear operator A having purely imaginary spectrum.
    This is the definition adopted in Section 4 and is used as the criterion for stability.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On spectral stability of one- and bi-frequency solitary waves in Soler model in (3+1)D." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VPDYBJDV

@misc{pith2026241221170,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On spectral stability of one- and bi-frequency solitary waves in Soler model in (3+1)D},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VPDYBJDV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.21170}
}
read the original abstract

For the nonlinear Dirac equation with scalar self-interaction (the Soler model) in three spatial dimensions, we consider the linearization at solitary wave solutions and find the invariant spaces which correspond to different spherical harmonics, thus achieving the radial reduction of the spectral stability analysis. We apply the same technique to the bi-frequency solitary waves (which are generically present in the Soler model) and show that they can also possess linear stability properties similar to those of one-frequency solitary waves.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Abenda, http://www.numdam.org/item/AIHPA_1998__68_2_229_0 Solitary waves for M axwell-- D irac and C oulomb-- D irac models\/ , Ann

    S. Abenda, http://www.numdam.org/item/AIHPA_1998__68_2_229_0 Solitary waves for M axwell-- D irac and C oulomb-- D irac models\/ , Ann. Inst. H. Poincar\'e Phys. Th\'eor. 68 (1998), pp. 229--244

    work page 1998

  2. [2]

    A. S. Alexandrov, editor, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6348-0 Polarons in Advanced Materials\/ , vol. 103 of Materials Science\/ , Springer, Dordrecht, 2008

    doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6348-0 2008

  3. [3]

    Bialynicki-Birula and Z

    I. Bialynicki-Birula and Z. Bialynicka-Birula, http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.038001 Comment on `` N ondispersive analytical solutions to the D irac equation''\/ , Physical Review Research 2 (2020), p. 038001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.038001 2020

  4. [4]

    Berkolaiko and A

    G. Berkolaiko and A. Comech, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/mmnp/20127202 On spectral stability of solitary waves of nonlinear D irac equation in 1 D \/ , Math. Model. Nat. Phenom. 7 (2012), pp. 13--31

    work page arXiv 2012

  5. [5]

    Boussa \" d and A

    N. Boussa \" d and A. Comech, http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/16M1081385 Nonrelativistic asymptotics of solitary waves in the D irac equation with S oler-type nonlinearity\/ , SIAM J. Math. Anal. 49 (2017), pp. 2527--2572

    work page doi:10.1137/16m1081385 2017

  6. [6]

    Boussa\" i d and A

    N. Boussa\" i d and A. Comech, http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/cpaa.2018065 Spectral stability of bi-frequency solitary waves in S oler and D irac-- K lein-- G ordon models\/ , Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 17 (2018), pp. 1331--1347

    doi:10.3934/cpaa.2018065 2018

  7. [7]

    Boussa \" d and A

    N. Boussa \" d and A. Comech, http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/surv/244 Nonlinear D irac equation. S pectral stability of solitary waves\/ , vol. 244 of Mathematical Surveys and Monographs\/ , American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2019

    work page doi:10.1090/surv/244

  8. [8]

    Boussa \" d and A

    N. Boussa \" d and A. Comech, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa.2019.108289 Spectral stability of small amplitude solitary waves of the D irac equation with the S oler-type nonlinearity\/ , J. Functional Analysis 277 (2019), p. 108289

    arXiv 2019

Show all 47 references
  1. [9]

    J. D. Bjorken and S. D. Drell, Relativistic quantum fields\/ , McGraw-Hill, New York, 1965

    1965

  2. [10]

    M. V. Berry, http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1984.0023 Quantal phase factors accompanying adiabatic changes\/ , Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) Ser. A 392 (1984), pp. 45--57

    1984

  3. [11]

    N. N. Bogolyubov, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02745585 On a new method in the theory of superconductivity\/ , Nuovo Cim. 7 (1958), pp. 794--805

    1958 doi

  4. [12]

    Bournaveas, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03605309608821204 Local existence for the M axwell-- D irac equations in three space dimensions\/ , Comm

    N. Bournaveas, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03605309608821204 Local existence for the M axwell-- D irac equations in three space dimensions\/ , Comm. Partial Differential Equations 21 (1996), pp. 693--720

    1996 doi

  5. [13]

    H. A. Bethe and E. E. Salpeter, Quantum mechanics of one- and two-electron atoms\/ , Plenum Publishing Corp., New York, 1977, reprint of the 1957 original

    1977

  6. [14]

    \'E . Cartan, http://dx.doi.org/10.24033/bsmf.916 Les groupes projectifs qui ne laissent invariante aucune multiplicit \'e plane\/ , Bulletin de la Soci \'e t \'e Math \'e matique de France 41 (1913), pp. 53--96

    1913 doi

  7. [15]

    Cuevas-Maraver, P

    J. Cuevas-Maraver, P. G. Kevrekidis, A. Saxena, A. Comech, and R. Lan, http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.214101 Stability of solitary waves and vortices in a 2 D nonlinear D irac model\/ , Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016), p. 214101

    2016 doi

  8. [16]

    Comech and D

    A. Comech and D. Stuart, http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/cpaa.2018066 Small amplitude solitary waves in the D irac-- M axwell system\/ , Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 17 (2018), pp. 1349--1370

    2018 doi

  9. [17]

    Comech and M

    A. Comech and M. Zubkov, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/46/43/435201 Polarons as stable solitary wave solutions to the D irac-- C oulomb system\/ , J. Phys. A 46 (2013), pp. 435201, 21pp

    2013 doi

  10. [18]

    Derezinski, Open problems about many-body D irac operators\/ , Bulletin of International Association of Mathematical Physics (2012)

    J. Derezinski, Open problems about many-body D irac operators\/ , Bulletin of International Association of Mathematical Physics (2012)

    2012

  11. [19]

    Dvali, M

    G. Dvali, M. Ettengruber, and A. Stuhlfauth, http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.055046 Kaluza-- K lein spectroscopy from neutron oscillations into hidden dimensions\/ , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024), p. 055046

    2024 doi

  12. [20]

    P. A. M. Dirac, http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1928.0023 The quantum theory of the electron\/ , Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A 117 (1928), pp. 610--624

    1928

  13. [21]

    P. A. M. Dirac, http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.33110 Does renormalization make sense?\/ , http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.33110 in http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.33110 AIP Conference Proceedings\/ , vol. 74, pp. 129--130, 1981

    1981 doi

  14. [22]

    M. J. Esteban, V. Georgiev, and \'E . S \'e r \'e , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01254347 Stationary solutions of the M axwell-- D irac and the K lein-- G ordon-- D irac equations\/ , Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 4 (1996), pp. 265--281

    1996 doi

  15. [23]

    M. J. Esteban and \'E . S \'e r \'e , http://projecteuclid.org/getRecord?id=euclid.cmp/1104273565 Stationary states of the nonlinear D irac equation: a variational approach\/ , Comm. Math. Phys. 171 (1995), pp. 323--350

    1995

  16. [24]

    Everschor-Sitte, J

    K. Everschor-Sitte, J. Masell, R. M. Reeve, and M. Kläui, http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.5048972 Perspective: M agnetic skyrmions -- O verview of recent progress in an active research field \/ , J. Appl. Phys. 124 (2018), p. 240901

    2018 doi

  17. [25]

    Franchini, M

    C. Franchini, M. Reticcioli, M. Setvin, and U. Diebold, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41578-021-00289-w Polarons in materials\/ , Nature Reviews Materials 6 (2021), pp. 560--586

    2021 doi

  18. [26]

    Galindo, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02785129 A remarkable invariance of classical D irac L agrangians\/ , Lett

    A. Galindo, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02785129 A remarkable invariance of classical D irac L agrangians\/ , Lett. Nuovo Cimento (2) 20 (1977), pp. 210--212

    1977 doi

  19. [27]

    Gross, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpa.3160190102 The C auchy problem for the coupled M axwell and D irac equations\/ , Comm

    L. Gross, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpa.3160190102 The C auchy problem for the coupled M axwell and D irac equations\/ , Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 19 (1966), pp. 1--15

    1966 doi

  20. [28]

    D. D. Ivanenko, http://www.neo-classical-physics.info/uploads/3/0/6/5/3065888/ivanenko_-_remarks_on_interaction.pdf Notes to the theory of interaction via particles\/ , Zh. Eksper. Teoret. Fiz 8 (1938), pp. 260--266

    1938

  21. [29]

    H. Kalf, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S030821050002031X Non-existence of eigenvalues of D irac operators\/ , Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A: Mathematics 89 (1981), pp. 309--317

    1981 doi

  22. [30]

    Kamyshkov, J

    Y. Kamyshkov, J. Ternullo, L. Varriano, and Z. Berezhiani, http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sym14020230 Neutron-mirror neutron oscillations in absorbing matter\/ , Symmetry 14 (2022)

    2022 doi

  23. [31]

    M. K. Kiessling and A. S. Tahvildar-Zadeh, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/49/13/135301 A novel quantum-mechanical interpretation of the D irac equation\/ , J. Phys. A 49 (2016), p. 135301

    2016 doi

  24. [32]

    Kalf and O

    H. Kalf and O. Yamada, http://dx.doi.org/10.2977/prims/1195143358 Note on the paper: `` S trong unique continuation property for the D irac equation'' by L . D e C arli and T . \= O kaji\/ , Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 35 (1999), pp. 847--852

    1999

  25. [33]

    T. I. Lakoba, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2017.11.032 Numerical study of solitary wave stability in cubic nonlinear D irac equations in 1 D \/ , Physics Letters A 382 (2018), pp. 300--308

    2018 doi

  26. [34]

    A. G. Lisi, http://stacks.iop.org/0305-4470/28/5385 A solitary wave solution of the M axwell-- D irac equations\/ , J. Phys. A 28 (1995), pp. 5385--5392

    1995

  27. [35]

    Monastyrskij, https://museum.itmo.ru/images/person/16/ignatovsky1.pdf Ignatovsky and the pre-history of the discovery of topological invariants in Q uantum M echanics\/ (1999)

    M. Monastyrskij, https://museum.itmo.ru/images/person/16/ignatovsky1.pdf Ignatovsky and the pre-history of the discovery of topological invariants in Q uantum M echanics\/ (1999)

    1999

  28. [36]

    Okaji, H

    T. Okaji, H. Kalf, and O. Yamada, http://arxiv.org/abs/1403.6900 Spectral problems about many-body D irac operators mentioned by D erezi\' n ski\/ (2014), 1403.6900

    2014 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Pauli, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01397326 Zur Q uantenmechanik des magnetischen E lektrons\/ , Z

    W. Pauli, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01397326 Zur Q uantenmechanik des magnetischen E lektrons\/ , Z. Phys 43 (1927), pp. 601--623

    1927 doi

  30. [38]

    Phillips, W

    D. Phillips, W. Snow, K. Babu, S. Banerjee, D. Baxter, Z. Berezhiani, M. Bergevin, S. Bhattacharya, G. Brooijmans, L. Castellanos, M.-C. Chen, C. Coppola, R. Cowsik, J. Crabtree, P. Das, E. Dees, A. Dolgov, P. Ferguson, M. Frost, T. Gabriel, A. Gal, F. Gallmeier, K. Ganezer, E...

    2016

  31. [39]

    A. F. Ra \ n ada, https://inis.iaea.org/search/searchsinglerecord.aspx?recordsFor=SingleRecord&RN=14800443 Classical nonlinear D irac field models of extended particles\/ , https://inis.iaea.org/search/searchsinglerecord.aspx?recordsFor=SingleRecord&RN=14800443 in A. O. Barut,...

    1983

  32. [40]

    L. I. Schiff, Quantum Mechanics\/ , McGraw-Hill, New York, 1949

    1949

  33. [41]

    Soler, http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.1.2766 Classical, stable, nonlinear spinor field with positive rest energy\/ , Phys

    M. Soler, http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.1.2766 Classical, stable, nonlinear spinor field with positive rest energy\/ , Phys. Rev. D 1 (1970), pp. 2766--2769

    1970 doi

  34. [42]

    A. Sommerfeld, https://uni-tuebingen.de/fileadmin/Uni_Tuebingen/Fakultaeten/MathePhysik/Institute/IAP/Forschung/MOettel/Geburt_QM/sommerfeld_AnnPhys_356_1_1916.pdf Zur Q uantentheorie der S pektrallinien\/ , Annalen der Physik 356 (1916), pp. 1--94

    1916

  35. [43]

    Thaller, The D irac equation\/ , Texts and Monographs in Physics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1992

    B. Thaller, The D irac equation\/ , Texts and Monographs in Physics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1992

    1992

  36. [44]

    B. L. van der Waerden, https://gdz.sub.uni-goettingen.de/id/PPN252457811_1929 Spinoranalyse\/ , Nachr. Akad. Wiss. G \"o ttingen Math.-Phys. Kl. (1929), pp. 100--109

    1929

  37. [45]

    B. L. van der Waerden, Die G ruppentheoretische M ethode in der Q uantenmechanik\/ , Die G rundlehren der M athematischen W issenschaften in E inzeldarstellungen, B and 36, Springer, Berlin, 1932

    1932

  38. [46]

    Wakano, http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/PTP.35.1117 Intensely localized solutions of the classical D irac-- M axwell field equations\/ , Progr

    M. Wakano, http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/PTP.35.1117 Intensely localized solutions of the classical D irac-- M axwell field equations\/ , Progr. Theoret. Phys. 35 (1966), pp. 1117--1141

    1966 doi

  39. [47]

    Zahed and G

    I. Zahed and G. Brown, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(86)90142-0 The S kyrme model\/ , Physics Reports 142 (1986), pp. 1--102

    1986 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.