Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 45 references

MDD: A Dataset for Text-and-Music Conditioned Duet Dance Generation

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper introduces MDD, the first dataset to align duet dance motion, music, and fine-grained text, enabling text-controlled duet dance generation.

desk verdict A genuinely new duet-dance dataset with text+music annotations, but the LLM-based annotation pipeline needs empirical validation before the fine-grained text control claim can be fully trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.16911 v1 pith:VQ4MQ3S3 submitted 2025-08-23 cs.GR cs.CVcs.MMcs.SD

Prerit Gupta , Jason Alexander Fotso-Puepi , Zhengyuan Li , Jay Mehta , Aniket Bera (Purdue University , West Lafayette , IN , USA) This is my paper
classification cs.GRcs.CVcs.MMcs.SD
keywords duetdancegenerationtext-to-motionmusic-conditionedmotioncapturedatasetmultimodalbenchmarklead-followerinteractionfine-grainedtextannotation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces MDD, a large-scale duet dance dataset that joins three modalities that had not been paired for partner dancing: professional motion capture, synchronized music, and fine-grained natural-language descriptions. The authors aim to make duet dance generation controllable in the same way solo text-to-motion is controllable, by giving models text that specifies moves, spatial relationships, and rhythm while music supplies timing. They claim MDD is the first such dataset, with 10.34 hours of motion capture across 15 genres and more than 10,000 text descriptions, and they define two new tasks around it. A reader should care because the dataset turns an under-explored problem—two dancers coordinating as leader and follower—into a benchmarkable generation task.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the aligned triple of motion capture clips, music, and fine-grained text annotations. Two design choices do the work: genre-balanced sampling across 15 Latin, Ballroom, and Social dance genres, and a two-stage annotation pipeline in which human annotators produce raw descriptions and a language model refines them into polished move-name-plus-description text. The annotation vocabulary—spatial relationships, body movement, and rhythm—is what lets text control both leader and follower roles.

What would settle it

Take a random sample of MDD clips, have professional dancers identify every named move that occurs and its timing, then compare against the processed text descriptions; if a substantial share of descriptions contain moves not present in the clip, the claimed fine-grained text alignment is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that duet dance can be captured as a three-way aligned multimodal benchmark: over 4.4 million frames of 120 fps motion capture from 30 dancers, music synchronized to the recordings, and text annotations that name specific moves and describe spatial relationships, body movements, and rhythm. The paper argues this is the first dataset to integrate human motion, music, and text for duet dance, going beyond prior duet dance datasets that pair motion with music but lack text, and beyond two-person interaction datasets that lack dance-specific movement vocabulary and music. On this foundation the paper defines two tasks: Text-to-Duet, where both dancers' motions are generated

Load-bearing premise

The central assumption is that the automated cleanup of the written descriptions keeps them accurately tied to what the two dancers actually do in the motion capture; if that tie is broken, the text control the dataset promises is not really there.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Text-to-Duet becomes a well-defined benchmark task with shared data, allowing models to be compared on leader-follower coordination rather than on bespoke settings.
  • The 15-genre, wide-BPM coverage makes it possible to test whether a single text-conditioned model transfers across dance styles.
  • Text-to-Dance Accompaniment gives a concrete setting for reactive motion synthesis: the follower's motion can be evaluated relative to the leader, the music, and the text, not just for visual plausibility.
  • Because the annotations name specific moves, downstream work can use them as pseudo-labels for move-level retrieval and choreography parsing.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Not claimed in the paper: the same annotation taxonomy could transfer to group choreography or contact sports, where spatial relationships and rhythmic cues also matter.
  • Not claimed in the paper: a testable extension would be to have expert dancers verify whether every named move in the processed text actually occurs in the corresponding motion clip, quantifying annotation precision beyond the paper's illustrative examples.
  • Not claimed in the paper: the two tasks could feed interactive applications where a user supplies a text prompt and a virtual partner dances in real time; the paper itself stops at static generation benchmarks.
  • Not claimed in the paper: whether text descriptions actually improve over music-only conditioning for duet dance is not settled by the baseline experiments; a controlled ablation with and without text would isolate that contribution.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces MDD (Multimodal DuetDance), a dataset of 620 minutes (10.34 hours) of professional duet dance motion capture at 120 fps across 15 genres, synchronized with music and accompanied by more than 10K natural-language descriptions. The dataset supports two newly proposed tasks: Text-to-Duet, which generates both dancers' motion from music and a text prompt, and Text-to-Dance Accompaniment, which generates the follower's motion from the leader's motion, music, and text. The authors report statistics for genre coverage, dancer demographics, annotation counts, and BPM ranges, and they present baseline evaluations of an adapted interaction-generation method on the proposed tasks.

Significance. If the dataset and its annotations are reliable, MDD would be the first duet-dance dataset to combine motion, music, and fine-grained text, and it is substantially larger than existing duet-dance datasets (Duolando/DD100 at 1.95 hours and InterDance at 3.93 hours). The collection effort is a clear strength: 30 professional dancers, 15 genres across Ballroom, Latin, and Social styles, 120 fps OptiTrack capture, and explicit attention to marker-swear and post-processing. The two proposed tasks fill a genuine gap: existing duet-dance benchmarks lack text conditioning, and existing interactive-text benchmarks lack music and dance-specific vocabulary. The paper's central risk is annotation fidelity: the text annotations are the enabling modality, yet their semantic and temporal correctness is not validated. The baselines, while not the main contribution, give future work a starting point. The manuscript would be a community resource if the annotation-validation gap is closed and the dataset is released with clear documentation.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.2 (Annotation Refining), Table 5] The central claim that MDD provides fine-grained text control depends on the correctness and temporal alignment of the GPT-4o-refined descriptions. The paper reports no human validation of the refined text: no inter-annotator agreement, no expert review, and no check that move names or temporal connectives ('after which', 'leading into') match the actual motion sequence. Table 5 shows polished output but does not demonstrate that the LLM did not hallucinate a move, reorder events, or add details absent from the motion. This is load-bearing because Text-to-Duet and Text-to-Dance Accompaniment condition on these descriptions. The manuscript must add a validation protocol, e.g., expert agreement rates, a hallucination audit, and a temporal-ordering check, or explicitly provide evidence that refinement preserves ground-truth alignment.
  2. [§3.2 (Data Collection) and Figure 10] Even before LLM refinement, no annotation-quality statistics are reported for the raw human descriptions. The paper states that annotators had diverse dance backgrounds but does not give the annotation instructions, number of annotators per clip, or any measure of agreement. Without inter-annotator agreement or a qualitative error analysis, the claim that the dataset contains >10K 'fine-grained' descriptions is an assertion rather than a demonstrated property. Please add annotation-protocol details and quantitative quality metrics for both raw and refined annotations.
  3. [§3.1 and Figure 2] The annotation granularity is not specified: are text descriptions aligned to the entire clip, to fixed windows, or to time-stamped move segments? The examples in Figure 2 and Table 5 describe multi-step sequences with temporal ordering ('after which', 'leading into'), but no timestamps or segment boundaries are provided. For the proposed text-conditioned generation tasks, clip-level descriptions would give only coarse semantic control and would undercut the 'fine-grained' claim. The paper should state the temporal granularity of annotations and, if appropriate, provide segment-level annotations or timestamps.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table 5] The column 'LLM-processed Move Name' is not defined. Clarify whether it is a free-form LLM output or a constrained label from a fixed vocabulary, and how it is extracted from the description.
  2. [Figure 2(a)] The claim that samples show 'high motion quality with rich annotations' is subjective. Please replace or supplement with quantitative indicators, e.g., marker-occlusion statistics, joint-angle smoothness, or a comparison of motion distributions across genres.
  3. [Abstract and §3.1] Minor consistency check: 4.4M frames at 120 fps is approximately 10.19 hours, which is close to but not exactly '10.34 hours.' Either reconcile the numbers or clarify what the 620-minute figure includes (e.g., post-processed vs. raw capture time).
  4. [References and §3.2.1] The paper should provide a data-availability statement with a direct download link, license, and usage terms. Also, the legal rationale for using copyrighted music excerpts under fair use is stated too briefly; given the dataset is to be distributed, provide more detail on the status of each audio track.
  5. [Throughout] There are several typos and spacing issues, e.g., 'with over10K' in the abstract and 'fro controlled release' in Table 5. A careful proofreading pass is needed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: MDD is an empirical dataset paper whose claims rest on data collection and baselines, not on fitted parameters or self-citation chains.

full rationale

MDD is a dataset and benchmark paper, not a theoretical derivation. Its central claims—being the first dataset integrating motion, music, and text for duet dance, and enabling Text-to-Duet and Text-to-Dance Accompaniment—are supported by the collection statistics (620 minutes, 15 genres, over 10K descriptions) and by baseline evaluations. No model parameter is fitted to a subset and then 'predicted' on a closely related quantity; the baselines are evaluated on the dataset in the standard way. The GPT-4o annotation refinement step is a data-construction choice; if it introduces misalignments, that is a data-quality limitation, not a circularity. The authors cite their own prior work (e.g., SimmotionEdit, Text2Gestures) only as related work, and those citations do not carry the load of the dataset claims. No equation or stated derivation reduces to its own inputs by construction, and no 'uniqueness theorem' is invoked to force a choice. Thus the circularity burden is minimal and the paper is essentially self-contained as an empirical contribution.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the reliability of motion capture, the fidelity of LLM-processed text annotations, and the representativeness of the genre/dancer sample. No new physical entities or fitted parameters are introduced; the only inputs are the raw recordings, music, and annotations.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption OptiTrack marker-based motion capture at 120fps with 53 retro-reflective markers produces accurate 3D positions for two interacting dancers.
    All downstream claims about motion quality and text-motion alignment rest on the fidelity of this capture setup (Section 3.2.2).
  • domain assumption The LLM-based annotation refinement (e.g., GPT-4o processed descriptions in Table 5) preserves the original meaning, temporal order, and dance vocabulary of human annotations.
    The fine-grained text control of the proposed tasks depends on these LLM-rewritten descriptions remaining faithful to the actual motions and music (Section 3.2.5, Table 5).
  • domain assumption The 15 selected genres and 30 intermediate/advanced dancers provide a sufficiently diverse and representative sample of duet dance styles for training generalizable text-and-music conditioned models.
    The dataset's claim of enabling genre generalization relies on this coverage (Sections 3.1, 3.2.2).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of MDD: A Dataset for Text-and-Music Conditioned Duet Dance Generation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VQ4MQ3S3

@misc{pith2026250816911,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: MDD: A Dataset for Text-and-Music Conditioned Duet Dance Generation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VQ4MQ3S3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.16911}
}
read the original abstract

We introduce Multimodal DuetDance (MDD), a diverse multimodal benchmark dataset designed for text-controlled and music-conditioned 3D duet dance motion generation. Our dataset comprises 620 minutes of high-quality motion capture data performed by professional dancers, synchronized with music, and detailed with over 10K fine-grained natural language descriptions. The annotations capture a rich movement vocabulary, detailing spatial relationships, body movements, and rhythm, making MDD the first dataset to seamlessly integrate human motions, music, and text for duet dance generation. We introduce two novel tasks supported by our dataset: (1) Text-to-Duet, where given music and a textual prompt, both the leader and follower dance motion are generated (2) Text-to-Dance Accompaniment, where given music, textual prompt, and the leader's motion, the follower's motion is generated in a cohesive, text-aligned manner. We include baseline evaluations on both tasks to support future research.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Listen, denoise, action! audio-driven motion synthesis with diffusion models

    Simon Alexanderson, Rajmund Nagy, Jonas Beskow, and Gustav Eje Henter. Listen, denoise, action! audio-driven motion synthesis with diffusion models. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 42(4):1–20, 2023. 2, 6

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Motionfix: Text-driven 3d human motion editing

    Nikos Athanasiou, Alp ´ar Cseke, Markos Diomataris, Michael J Black, and G ¨ul Varol. Motionfix: Text-driven 3d human motion editing. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2024 Conference Papers, pages 1–11, 2024. 2

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Text2gestures: A transformer-based network for generating emotive body gestures for virtual agents

    Uttaran Bhattacharya, Nicholas Rewkowski, Abhishek Banerjee, Pooja Guhan, Aniket Bera, and Dinesh Manocha. Text2gestures: A transformer-based network for generating emotive body gestures for virtual agents. In 2021 IEEE vir- tual reality and 3D user interfaces (VR) , pages 1–10. IEEE,

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Ready-to-react: Online reaction policy for two-character interaction genera- tion

    Zhi Cen, Huaijin Pi, Sida Peng, Qing Shuai, Yujun Shen, Hujun Bao, Xiaowei Zhou, and Ruizhen Hu. Ready-to-react: Online reaction policy for two-character interaction genera- tion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.20370, 2025. 3

    arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    Jukebox: A gen- erative model for music

    Prafulla Dhariwal, Heewoo Jun, Christine Payne, Jong Wook Kim, Alec Radford, and Ilya Sutskever. Jukebox: A gen- erative model for music. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.00341,

    arXiv 2005

  6. [6]

    Remos: 3d motion- conditioned reaction synthesis for two-person interactions

    Anindita Ghosh, Rishabh Dabral, Vladislav Golyanik, Chris- tian Theobalt, and Philipp Slusallek. Remos: 3d motion- conditioned reaction synthesis for two-person interactions. In European Conference on Computer Vision , pages 418–

    work page

  7. [7]

    Duetgen: Music driven two-person dance generation via hierarchical masked modeling

    Anindita Ghosh, Bing Zhou, Rishabh Dabral, Jian Wang, Vladislav Golyanik, Christian Theobalt, Philipp Slusallek, and Chuan Guo. Duetgen: Music driven two-person dance generation via hierarchical masked modeling. In Proceed- ings of the Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques Conference Conference Papers , pages 1–11, 2025. 2

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Tm2d: Bimodality driven 3d dance generation via music-text integration

    Kehong Gong, Dongze Lian, Heng Chang, Chuan Guo, Zi- hang Jiang, Xinxin Zuo, Michael Bi Mi, and Xinchao Wang. Tm2d: Bimodality driven 3d dance generation via music-text integration. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 9942–9952, 2023. 3

    work page 2023

Show all 45 references
  1. [9]

    Generating diverse and natural 3d human motions from text

    Chuan Guo, Shihao Zou, Xinxin Zuo, Sen Wang, Wei Ji, Xingyu Li, and Li Cheng. Generating diverse and natural 3d human motions from text. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 5152–5161, 2022. 7

    2022

  2. [10]

    Dance revolution: Long-term dance gen- eration with music via curriculum learning

    Ruozi Huang, Huang Hu, Wei Wu, Kei Sawada, Mi Zhang, and Daxin Jiang. Dance revolution: Long-term dance gen- eration with music via curriculum learning. In International conference on learning representations, 2020. 2, 6

    2020

  3. [11]

    Gpt-4o: The cutting-edge advancement in multimodal llm

    Raisa Islam and Owana Marzia Moushi. Gpt-4o: The cutting-edge advancement in multimodal llm. Authorea Preprints, 2024. 5

    2024

  4. [12]

    aitviewer, 2022

    Manuel Kaufmann, Velko Vechev, and Dario Mylonopoulos. aitviewer, 2022. 5

    2022

  5. [13]

    Music-driven group choreography

    Nhat Le, Thang Pham, Tuong Do, Erman Tjiputra, Quang D Tran, and Anh Nguyen. Music-driven group choreography. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 8673–8682, 2023. 6

    2023

  6. [14]

    Ai choreographer: Music conditioned 3d dance generation with aist++

    Ruilong Li, Shan Yang, David A Ross, and Angjoo Kanazawa. Ai choreographer: Music conditioned 3d dance generation with aist++. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , pages 13401– 13412, 2021. 2, 6

    2021

  7. [15]

    Finedance: A fine-grained choreography dataset for 3d full body dance generation

    Ronghui Li, Junfan Zhao, Yachao Zhang, Mingyang Su, Zeping Ren, Han Zhang, Yansong Tang, and Xiu Li. Finedance: A fine-grained choreography dataset for 3d full body dance generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF In- ternational Conference on Computer Vision , pages 10234– 10...

    2023

  8. [16]

    Exploring multi-modal control in music- driven dance generation

    Ronghui Li, Yuqin Dai, Yachao Zhang, Jun Li, Jian Yang, Jie Guo, and Xiu Li. Exploring multi-modal control in music- driven dance generation. In ICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE Inter- national Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Pro- cessing (ICASSP), pages 8281–8285. IEEE, 2024. 2

    2024

  9. [17]

    Interdance: Reactive 3d dance generation with re- alistic duet interactions

    Ronghui Li, Youliang Zhang, Yachao Zhang, Yuxiang Zhang, Mingyang Su, Jie Guo, Ziwei Liu, Yebin Liu, and Xiu Li. Interdance: Reactive 3d dance generation with re- alistic duet interactions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.16982 ,

    arXiv

  10. [18]

    Simmotionedit: Text-based human motion editing with motion similarity pre- diction

    Zhengyuan Li, Kai Cheng, Anindita Ghosh, Uttaran Bhat- tacharya, Liangyan Gui, and Aniket Bera. Simmotionedit: Text-based human motion editing with motion similarity pre- diction. In Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pages 27827–27837, 2025. 3

    2025

  11. [19]

    Omg: Towards open-vocabulary motion generation via mix- ture of controllers

    Han Liang, Jiacheng Bao, Ruichi Zhang, Sihan Ren, Yuecheng Xu, Sibei Yang, Xin Chen, Jingyi Yu, and Lan Xu. Omg: Towards open-vocabulary motion generation via mix- ture of controllers. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, page...

    2024

  12. [20]

    Intergen: Diffusion-based multi-human motion genera- tion under complex interactions

    Han Liang, Wenqian Zhang, Wenxuan Li, Jingyi Yu, and Lan Xu. Intergen: Diffusion-based multi-human motion genera- tion under complex interactions. International Journal of Computer Vision, 132(9):3463–3483, 2024. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7

    2024

  13. [21]

    Decoupled weight decay regularization

    Ilya Loshchilov and Frank Hutter. Decoupled weight decay regularization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05101, 2017. 7

    2017 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Popdg: Popular 3d dance generation with popdanceset

    Zhenye Luo, Min Ren, Xuecai Hu, Yongzhen Huang, and Li Yao. Popdg: Popular 3d dance generation with popdanceset. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 26984–26993, 2024. 2, 6

    2024

  15. [23]

    librosa: Audio and music signal analysis in python

    Brian McFee, Colin Raffel, Dawen Liang, Daniel PW Ellis, Matt McVicar, Eric Battenberg, and Oriol Nieto. librosa: Audio and music signal analysis in python. SciPy, 2015:18– 24, 2015. 7

    2015

  16. [24]

    Gan-based reactive motion synthesis with class-aware discriminators for human–human interaction

    Qianhui Men, Hubert PH Shum, Edmond SL Ho, and Howard Leung. Gan-based reactive motion synthesis with class-aware discriminators for human–human interaction. Computers & Graphics, 102:634–645, 2022. 3

    2022

  17. [25]

    Rethinking diffusion for text-driven human motion generation

    Zichong Meng, Yiming Xie, Xiaogang Peng, Zeyu Han, and Huaizu Jiang. Rethinking diffusion for text-driven human motion generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.16575, 2024. 2

    2024 arXiv

  18. [26]

    OptiTrack Motive: Motion Capture Software

    NaturalPoint, Inc. OptiTrack Motive: Motion Capture Software. https://optitrack.com/products/ motive/, 2019. Version 2.0 or later. 3

    2019

  19. [27]

    Georgios Pavlakos, Vasileios Choutas, Nima Ghorbani, Timo Bolkart, Ahmed A. A. Osman, Dimitrios Tzionas, and Michael J. Black. Expressive body capture: 3D hands, face, and body from a single image. In Proceedings IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pa...

    2019

  20. [28]

    Temos: Generating diverse human motions from textual descriptions

    Mathis Petrovich, Michael J Black, and G ¨ul Varol. Temos: Generating diverse human motions from textual descriptions. In European Conference on Computer Vision , pages 480–

  21. [29]

    Bailando: 3d dance generation by actor-critic gpt with choreographic memory

    Li Siyao, Weijiang Yu, Tianpei Gu, Chunze Lin, Quan Wang, Chen Qian, Chen Change Loy, and Ziwei Liu. Bailando: 3d dance generation by actor-critic gpt with choreographic memory. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 11050–...

    2022

  22. [30]

    Bailando++: 3d dance gpt with choreographic memory

    Li Siyao, Weijiang Yu, Tianpei Gu, Chunze Lin, Quan Wang, Chen Qian, Chen Change Loy, and Ziwei Liu. Bailando++: 3d dance gpt with choreographic memory. IEEE Transac- tions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 45(12): 14192–14207, 2023. 2

    2023

  23. [31]

    Duolando: Follower gpt with off-policy reinforcement learning for dance accompaniment

    Li Siyao, Tianpei Gu, Zhitao Yang, Zhengyu Lin, Ziwei Liu, Henghui Ding, Lei Yang, and Chen Change Loy. Duolando: Follower gpt with off-policy reinforcement learning for dance accompaniment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.18811 ,

    arXiv

  24. [32]

    Smith and J

    J. Smith and J. Abel. The spherical interpolation method of source localization. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering , 12(1):246–252, 1987. 4

    1987

  25. [33]

    Motionclip: Exposing human motion generation to clip space

    Guy Tevet, Brian Gordon, Amir Hertz, Amit H Bermano, and Daniel Cohen-Or. Motionclip: Exposing human motion generation to clip space. In European Conference on Com- puter Vision, pages 358–374. Springer, 2022. 3

    2022

  26. [34]

    Human motion diffu- sion model

    Guy Tevet, Sigal Raab, Brian Gordon, Yoni Shafir, Daniel Cohen-or, and Amit Haim Bermano. Human motion diffu- sion model. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023. 2, 7

    2023

  27. [35]

    Edge: Editable dance generation from music

    Jonathan Tseng, Rodrigo Castellon, and Karen Liu. Edge: Editable dance generation from music. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 448–458, 2023. 2

    2023

  28. [36]

    Disco: Disentangled control for realistic human dance generation

    Tan Wang, Linjie Li, Kevin Lin, Yuanhao Zhai, Chung- Ching Lin, Zhengyuan Yang, Hanwang Zhang, Zicheng Liu, and Lijuan Wang. Disco: Disentangled control for realistic human dance generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (...

    2024

  29. [37]

    Fg-t2m: Fine-grained text-driven human motion generation via diffusion model

    Yin Wang, Zhiying Leng, Frederick WB Li, Shun-Cheng Wu, and Xiaohui Liang. Fg-t2m: Fine-grained text-driven human motion generation via diffusion model. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Com- puter Vision, pages 22035–22044, 2023. 2

    2023

  30. [38]

    Inter-x: Towards versatile human- human interaction analysis

    Liang Xu, Xintao Lv, Yichao Yan, Xin Jin, Shuwen Wu, Congsheng Xu, Yifan Liu, Yizhou Zhou, Fengyun Rao, Xingdong Sheng, et al. Inter-x: Towards versatile human- human interaction analysis. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , p...

    2024

  31. [39]

    Regennet: Towards human action-reaction synthesis

    Liang Xu, Yizhou Zhou, Yichao Yan, Xin Jin, Wenhan Zhu, Fengyun Rao, Xiaokang Yang, and Wenjun Zeng. Regennet: Towards human action-reaction synthesis. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 1759–1769, 2024. 3, 6

    2024

  32. [40]

    Longdanced- iff: Long-term dance generation with conditional diffusion model

    Siqi Yang, Zejun Yang, and Zhisheng Wang. Longdanced- iff: Long-term dance generation with conditional diffusion model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.11945, 2023. 2

    2023 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Generating human interaction motions in scenes with text control

    Hongwei Yi, Justus Thies, Michael J Black, Xue Bin Peng, and Davis Rempe. Generating human interaction motions in scenes with text control. In European Conference on Com- puter Vision, pages 246–263. Springer, 2024. 2

    2024

  34. [42]

    Generating human motion from textual descrip- tions with discrete representations

    Jianrong Zhang, Yangsong Zhang, Xiaodong Cun, Yong Zhang, Hongwei Zhao, Hongtao Lu, Xi Shen, and Ying Shan. Generating human motion from textual descrip- tions with discrete representations. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (...

    2023

  35. [43]

    Motiondif- fuse: Text-driven human motion generation with diffusion model

    Mingyuan Zhang, Zhongang Cai, Liang Pan, Fangzhou Hong, Xinying Guo, Lei Yang, and Ziwei Liu. Motiondif- fuse: Text-driven human motion generation with diffusion model. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 46(6):4115–4128, 2024. 2

    2024

  36. [44]

    Music2dance: Dancenet for music-driven dance generation

    Wenlin Zhuang, Congyi Wang, Jinxiang Chai, Yangang Wang, Ming Shao, and Siyu Xia. Music2dance: Dancenet for music-driven dance generation. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMM), 18(2):1–21, 2022. 2, 6 Figure 10. Annotation Tool Table...

    2022

  37. [437]

    Springer, 2024. 3, 6

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.