Will a Supernova explode in CD-30{\deg}11223?

E. Bravo; I. Dominguez; L. Piersanti; L.R.Yungelson

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 40 references

CD-30°11223 is not a supernova progenitor: rotation and magnetic angular-momentum transport quench the helium detonation, leaving a CO white dwarf with a 0.194-solar-mass He/C/O envelope.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 13:02 UTC pith:VSNZLXLW

load-bearing objection A careful rotating-binary evolution model that likely kills the SN Ia progenitor claim for CD-30, but the blanket generalization to all similar systems outruns the evidence. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.19222 v1 pith:VSNZLXLW submitted 2026-07-21 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.HE

Will a Supernova explode in CD-30{deg}11223?

L. Piersanti , L.R.Yungelson , E. Bravo , I. Dominguez This is my paper

classification astro-ph.SR astro-ph.HE

keywords white dwarf accretionhelium detonationdouble detonationType Ia supernova progenitorssdB+WD binariesstellar rotationangular momentum transporthelium flashes

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Every close binary with a hot subdwarf and a white dwarf is a candidate Type Ia supernova: if enough helium piles up on the white dwarf, it may detonate and then ignite carbon. This paper asks whether CD-30°11223, a well-studied member of that class, will actually explode. The answer, once rotation is accounted for, is no. Angular momentum deposited by accretion, redistributed by magnetic instabilities, lowers the effective gravity in the helium layer, so the strong helium flashes that do occur are not detonations and most of the accreted mass is ejected. The system ends as a carbon-oxygen white dwarf wrapped in a 0.194-solar-mass He/C/O buffer, and the authors argue the same holds for similar detached binaries. A sympathetic reader should take this as a concrete, mechanism-based case that rotation can close off a proposed supernova channel.

Core claim

The paper's central claim: CD-30°11223 is not a supernova progenitor. If rotation is ignored, the model produces a double detonation and a peculiar Type Ia event. Once rotation and magnetic angular-momentum transport are included, the accretor never reaches detonation: two very strong helium flashes (peak temperature ~1.35×10⁹ K, below detonation threshold) eject much of the accreted matter via Roche-lobe overflow. The final structure is a CO core capped by a ~0.194-solar-mass He/C/O envelope, with the donor reduced to an extremely low mass. The conclusion is extended to all detached binaries with similar masses and orbital periods.

What carries the argument

Rotation, and the internal redistribution of angular momentum by a magnetic dynamo instability in the differentially rotating white dwarf. The instability enforces nearly rigid rotation, so that during helium accretion the surface spin approaches the critical break-up rate. Centrifugal support then lowers the effective gravity of the accreted layers, reducing compressional heating — the heating that would otherwise drive the helium layer to detonation. Magnetic transport also suppresses mixing, so flashes burn inside the accreted layer rather than eroding the core. Each strong flash instead triggers Roche-lobe overflow that ejects most of the freshly accreted matter.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the white dwarf spins up as it accretes and that magnetic instabilities redistribute that angular momentum efficiently enough to lower the effective gravity in the helium layer; if tides from the companion slow the white dwarf significantly, the helium could compress and detonate as in the non-rotating model.

What would settle it

Measure or infer the white dwarf's surface rotation in a CD-30-like system that is already transferring mass: if it is locked near the orbital period (70.5 min) rather than near critical rotation, the spin-up premise fails and the non-rotating detonation path remains open. A complementary check: a 3D hydrodynamic simulation of the first strong helium flash at the reported ignition density (~7×10⁵ g/cm³) that produces a self-sustaining detonation would directly overturn the magnetic-model conclusion.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

CD-30°11223 will end as a stable CO white dwarf with a ~0.194-solar-mass He/C/O buffer, accreting at a very low rate from a nearly exhausted donor.
The suppression of detonation is robust to how angular momentum is transported: both shear-driven and magnetically enforced rigid rotation remove the explosion, though with different flash histories.
The conclusion is extended to detached sdB+WD binaries with similar component masses and orbital periods, removing part of the proposed double-detonation SN Ia progenitor population.
In the magnetic model, artificially draining the white dwarf's angular momentum on timescales from 1 to 10⁹ years never reignites helium, because the whole star compresses homologously instead of heating a local shell.
The non-rotating model, by contrast, yields a double detonation, a peculiar Type Ia-like event, and a hypervelocity donor (~747 km/s).

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Editorial inference: if tidal torques from the companion brake the white dwarf efficiently — an effect the paper explicitly leaves to future work — the spin-up premise fails and the non-rotating detonation path could be restored.
Editorial inference: for more massive white dwarfs (≳0.9 solar masses), where a much thinner helium layer can detonate, the same rotation mechanism may not suffice to suppress explosions; the paper's conclusion should not be extrapolated there without retesting.
Editorial inference: population models of Type Ia supernovae from sdB+WD binaries should be revised downward; a statistical prediction is a deficit of the dim, peculiar supernovae this channel was invoked to explain.
Editorial inference: the predicted end state — a massive He/C/O buffer on a CO white dwarf with a very low-mass companion — offers a concrete observational fingerprint for systems caught near the end of mass transfer.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

A careful rotating-binary evolution model that likely kills the SN Ia progenitor claim for CD-30, but the blanket generalization to all similar systems outruns the evidence.

read the letter

What you should know: this is the follow-up to Piersanti et al.'s rotating-WD paper on PTF J2238, now applied to CD-30 with the addition of Tayler-Spruit magnetic transport. The headline result is that both rotating models (with and without magnetic instability) avoid helium detonation, in contrast to the non-rotating model that produces a weak SN Ia. That is a real new result for this specific system.

The paper is careful. The two rotating models give the same qualitative outcome through different mechanisms, which is a good robustness check. They also run an explicit hydrodynamics check at the first He-flash to confirm it does not become a detonation. The discussion of the Tayler-Spruit instability is honest, including the fact that Fuller et al. would only make the transport more efficient and thus not change the conclusion. The citation pattern looks fair; the self-citation to Paper I is legitimate as the framework being extended.

Where are the soft spots? First, the generalization to “all detached binary systems having similar masses and orbital periods” is not supported by one parameter set for one system. The paper has no grid or uncertainty propagation. Second, the computation stops when the donor has been reduced to 0.0197 Msun, so the full consumption is not followed; the authors say the input physics becomes inadequate, which is fair, but it leaves a small edge. Third, and most importantly, the entire rotation-suppression argument depends on the accretor maintaining near-critical rotation. Tidal braking from the companion is not included, and the paper explicitly says “awaits exploration.” If tides are efficient, the non-rotating detonation path could be restored. This is not an internal inconsistency, but it means the strong conclusion is conditional on an unquantified external torque. The stress-test note is correct on this point.

That said, the authors do flag that caveat themselves. For CD-30 itself, under their stated assumptions, the no-explosion result looks as solid as this kind of evolutionary modeling can be. The overreach is in the last sentence of the abstract, not in the body of the work. I would trust the calculation more than the generalization.

So: this is a worthwhile paper for anyone working on SN Ia progenitors or accreting WDs. It deserves a serious referee, and I would send it out with a request to add a discussion of tidal torques and to soften the global conclusion. I would cite it if I were working on He-accretion outcomes.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper models the future evolution of the sdB+WD binary CD-30°11223 using the FuNS stellar evolution code. Three models are compared: a non-rotating accretor, a rotating accretor with rotation-driven instabilities, and a rotating model with Tayler-Spruit magnetic angular-momentum transport. In the non-rotating model, helium accretion leads to a helium detonation and a SN Ia-like event (0.98 foe, 0.243 Msun of 56Ni). In both rotating models, rotation reduces compressional heating so that strong helium flashes eject material without detonation; the magnetic model ends with a CO white dwarf capped by a massive He/C/O envelope (ΔM_env ~ 0.194 Msun) and a low-mass remnant of the donor. The authors conclude that CD-30 cannot be regarded as a SN Ia progenitor and generalize this to all detached binary systems with similar masses and orbital periods.

Significance. If the conclusion holds, it removes a proposed SN Ia progenitor channel for low-mass CO white dwarfs in sdB+WD binaries and strengthens the case that rotation must be included in double-detonation studies. The main strength is that the non-detonation outcome is reproduced in two rotating models with different angular-momentum transport prescriptions (purely hydrodynamical instabilities vs. Tayler-Spruit), so the qualitative result is not an artifact of one transport scheme. The work is forward modeling with standard external physics; no fitted value is repackaged as a derived prediction. The final configuration is a falsifiable prediction for future observations of CD-30. However, the conclusion is conditional on an unquantified tidal coupling and on extrapolation beyond the end of the computation, and the universal generalization is not supported by a parameter survey.

major comments (3)

[§7, Eq. (3) of Paper I] The central conclusion depends on the accreting WD retaining near-critical rotation during helium accretion. The paper explicitly states (Sec. 7) that angular momentum is deposited 'such that it could attain critical rotation velocity (Eq. (3) in Paper I)' and that 'the effect of tides that may slow-down rotation awaits exploration.' The non-rotating model (Sec. 4) detonates at M_WD=0.8934 Msun and ρ_ig=1.15e6 g cm^-3; if tidal torques from the 0.47 Msun companion keep the WD near orbital synchronization (ω≈1.5e-3 rad/s for P_orb=70.53 min) rather than near critical (ω_crit is at least an order of magnitude larger), the rotationally reduced compressibility disappears and the Sec. 4 detonation path is restored. Without a tidal synchronization estimate, the 'cannot be regarded as potential progenitor' conclusion is not fully secured.
[Abstract; §7] The statement that the conclusion 'applies also to all detached binary systems having similar masses of components and orbital periods' is not supported by the computations. Only one initial configuration is evolved (Sec. 3: M_WD=0.74 Msun, M_sdB=0.47 Msun, P0=88.17 min) under two angular-momentum transport prescriptions. No parameter survey is carried out, and the helium-flash behavior in Secs. 5–6 is sensitive to the mass-transfer history and donor composition. The universal claim should be removed or replaced by a clearly qualified statement until a grid of systems is computed.
[§6.1] The conclusion that the strong first helium flash in the magnetic model does not become a detonation rests on an explicit hydrodynamic code whose details 'will be presented elsewhere.' The flash ignites at ρ_ig=6.99e5 g cm^-3, only a factor ~1.6 below the non-rotating detonation density of 1.15e6 g cm^-3. Since this is the point that separates an explosion from a non-explosion in the magnetic model, the manuscript should provide sufficient numerical detail (resolution, shock-capturing scheme, nuclear network) or a citable code reference; otherwise the no-detonation claim is not independently checkable.

minor comments (5)

[Abstract] 'We use stellar the evolution code FuNS' should read 'the stellar evolution code'.
[§2] 'Lagragian' is a typo for 'Lagrangian'.
[§6.1, Abstract] The computation stops at M_don=0.0197 Msun because 'the adopted input physics became inadequate'; the abstract's 'the system ends its life' is therefore an extrapolation. The final envelope mass ΔM_env≈0.194 Msun should be labeled as an inference from the last computed model.
[§3/§7] The critical-rotation boundary condition is expressed via Eq. (3) of Paper I, which is not restated here. A brief restatement or summary would make the paper more self-contained.
[Abstract, §5] The abstract's 'two very strong He-flashes' refers specifically to the magnetic model; the rotating model of Sec. 5 experiences six helium flashes (Table 3). Clarify to avoid confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the CD-30 fate is obtained by forward stellar-evolution modeling with independently cited physics, not by a fit or self-citation masquerading as a prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—that CD-30 will not produce a SN Ia—is a forward evolutionary calculation using the FuNS code with physical prescriptions (Endal & Sofia 1978; Spruit 2002; Itoh et al. 1987) that are external to the present result. The non-rotating model does produce a He-detonation and a 0.98-foe SN Ia, while the rotating and magnetic models produce strong but non-dynamical He-flashes; this contrast is a computed outcome, not a definitional identity. The sdB initial model is fitted to observed Teff, log g, and L, but the subsequent evolution to He-accretion and flashes is a genuine prediction rather than a restatement of those fitted quantities. Self-citations to Paper I provide the framework, initial assumptions, and the prescription that accreted angular momentum can bring the WD toward critical rotation (Eq. 3 of Paper I), but the CD-30 calculation itself is independent and the conclusion is not proven by invoking Paper I alone. The acknowledged caveat that 'The effect of tides that may slow-down rotation awaits exploration' identifies an unquantified external assumption on which the no-SN-Ia conclusion depends, but an unvalidated input or model limitation is not the same as circularity. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and no known result is merely relabeled. The generalization to 'all detached binary systems having similar masses' is an extrapolation from the computed models, not a tautology. Therefore the derivation chain is not circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the adopted initial system parameters (fitted), the rotation prescriptions, and the assumption of no tidal braking. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)

H-rich skin mass of sdB donor (ΔM_H) = 6e-4 M_sun
Chosen to reproduce the observed surface gravity, effective temperature, and luminosity of the sdB component (Fig. 1).
Initial orbital period at formation (P0) = 88.17 min
Set by back-evolution so that the system matches the current observed period Porb=70.53 min after 38.03 Myr of gravitational-wave-driven shrinkage.

axioms (4)

domain assumption Standard stellar structure and nuclear reaction rates as implemented in FuNS
The evolution code assumes hydrostatic equilibrium, 1D spherical symmetry, and standard nuclear networks.
domain assumption Angular momentum transport by rotation-driven instabilities and the Tayler-Spruit mechanism (Spruit 2002)
The magnetic model uses this prescription to enforce near-rigid rotation; the efficiency of this mechanism is debated in the literature.
domain assumption No tidal torques act to remove angular momentum from the accreting WD
Explicitly acknowledged in Section 7: 'The effect of tides that may slow-down rotation awaits exploration.' If tides are efficient, the spin-up that suppresses detonation may be reduced.
domain assumption Matter lost from the WD during RLOF carries the specific angular momentum of the accretor
Used for orbital evolution; standard assumption but not verified.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 15911 in / 11183 out tokens · 118565 ms · 2026-08-01T13:02:05.547333+00:00 · methodology

0 comments

read the original abstract

Context: Accretion of He-rich matter onto a low mass carbon-oxygen white dwarf in a binary system with a He-rich donor may lead to an explosive event of Supernova Ia proportion, though with low peak luminosity and peculiar nucleosynthesis. Recently such a statement has been questioned, suggesting that, if the effects of rotation are accounted for in the evolution of the accretor, the latter does not explode, but it becomes a white dwarf with a massive He-buffer. Aims: We investigate the expected evolution of the currently detached binary CD-30{\deg}11223 harboring a 0.74 Msun carbon-oxygen white dwarf and a 0.47 Msun donor with a He-burning core and a very thin H-envelope (Delta M_H=6e-4 Msun). Methods: We use stellar the evolution code FuNS to compute the evolution of CD-30{\deg}11223. With respect to our earlier study of the system PTF J2238+743015.1, we include also the transport of angular momentum due to magnetic instabilities in the accretor interiors (``magnetic model''). Results: During the H-accretion phase, the effects of rotation in the accretor are negligible. In the ``magnetic model'', the angular momentum deposited by the accreted matter is very efficiently redistributed along the whole WD due to magnetic instabilities, so that the angular velocity of the accreted layers remains very low. During the He-accretion phase, the accretor experiences two very strong He-flashes which result in the ejection from the binary system of a large part of the matter previously accreted. The system ends its life as a carbon-oxygen core capped by a massive He/C/O-envelope (Delta M_{env} ~ 0.194 Msun) and an extremely low-mass companion, remnant of the donor. Conclusions: The system CD-30{\deg}11223 cannot be regarded as the potential progenitor of Supernova Ia. Such a conclusion applies also to all detached binary systems having similar masses of components and orbital periods.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.19222 by E. Bravo, I. Dominguez, L. Piersanti, L.R.Yungelson.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Surface gravity (upper panel) and luminosity (lower panel) as a function of the effective temperature of sdB models computed with fixed total mass (0.47 M⊙) and different mass of the H-rich skin, as reported in the plot (in 10−4 M⊙ units). Points with error bars have been derived from Deshmukh et al. (2024), see their Tab. 1. M˙ = 3 × 10−7 M⊙ yr−1 in order to simulate the evolution during the AGB phase. T… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Evolution of the rotating CO WD during the H-accretion phase. From top to bottom we report the mass transfer rate from the donor (in M⊙yr−1 ) and the variation of the WD total mass defined as M∗ WD = 103× MWD M⊙ − 0.74 . Zero-age (Age0) corresponds to the epoch of RLOF by the sdB star. For the sake of comparison, we report in the upper panel the mass transfer rate for the non-rotating model (red dashed … view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Time dependence of the WD total mass (upper panel), of the mass transfer rate from the companion (middle panel) and of the chemical composition of the accreted matter (lower panel) during the He-rich mass accretion phase in the rotating model. Article number, page 4 of 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Time evolution of the variation of the WD total mass during the H-rich mass accretion phase for the non-rotating model (red dashed line) and the magnetic model (solid black line). regions of a star can generate small magnetic field seeds that can be amplified into a toroidal magnetic field via a dynamo process by an instability of the field itself, most probably the Tayler instability (Tayler 1973). The t… view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Mass fraction abundance of some selected isotopes along the sdB donor in CD-30 at three different epochs during the evolution of the magnetic model, namely at the onset of the very first RLOF episode (left panel), when H-deprived material starts to be transferred (middle panel) and at the onset of the last mass transfer episode driving to a He-flash (right panel). After the H-rich buffer on the sdB star ha… view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Temperature (upper panel) and angular velocity (lower panel) profiles for selected models during the first He-rich matter accretion episode in the magnetic model. Lines labeled 5 correspond to the epoch when the accretor attains the critical value of angular velocity at the surface; lines labeled 6 correspond to the epoch when flash-driven convection sets in. In the upper panel, we report for each model t… view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Time evolution of selected physical properties of the magnetic model during the He-accretion phase. From top to bottom, we plot: the mass transfer rate (in M⊙yr−1 – panel a), the total mass of the accreting WD (in M⊙ – panel b), the chemical composition of the accreted matter (panel c), the total angular momentum of the accreting WD (in 1049erg · s – panel d), the specific angular momentum of the accreted… view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Mass fraction abundance of 4He (black line), 12C (blue line) and 16O along the last computed structure of the magnetic model. the lifting effects of rotation. At the end, during the mass transfer, zones of the sdB donor previously involved in the convective central He-burning phase are lost so that the accreted matter is carbon- and oxygen-rich and He-poor (see panel (c) in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

[1]

J., Townsley, D

Boos, S. J., Townsley, D. M., Shen, K. J., Caldwell, S., & Mile s, B. J. 2021, ApJ, 919, 126

2021
[2]

2018, Mont hly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 482, 4346

Bravo, E., Badenes, C., & Martínez-Rodríguez, H. 2018, Mont hly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 482, 4346

2018
[3]

2015, Ap J, 807, 74

Brooks, J., Bildsten, L., Marchant, P ., & Paxton, B. 2015, Ap J, 807, 74

2015
[4]

1971, Ap&SS, 10,355

Castellani, V ., Giannone, P ., & Renzini, A. 1971, Ap&SS, 10,355

1971
[5]

1928, Mathematische Annalen, 100, 32

Courant, R., Friedrichs, K., & Lewy, H. 1928, Mathematische Annalen, 100, 32

1928
[6]

2009, ApJ, 696, 797 den Hartogh, J

Cristallo, S., Straniero, O., Gallino, R., et al. 2009, ApJ, 696, 797 den Hartogh, J. W., Eggenberger, P ., & Deheuvels, S. 2020, A&A, 634, L16

2009
[7]

Denissenkov, P . A. & Pinsonneault, M. 2007, ApJ, 655, 1157

2007
[8]

B., Kupfer, T., & Dorsch, M

Deshmukh, K., Bauer, E. B., Kupfer, T., & Dorsch, M. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 2072

2024
[9]

Endal, A. S. & Soﬁa, S. 1978, ApJ, 220, 279

1978
[10]

L., & Jermyn, A

Fuller, J., Piro, A. L., & Jermyn, A. S. 2019, MNRAS, 485, 3661

2019
[11]

Hillman, Y ., Michaelis, A., & Perets, H. B. 2026, Journal of H igh Energy Astro- physics, 53, 100605

2026
[12]

1987, ApJ, 317, 733

Itoh, N., Kohyama, Y ., & Takeuchi, H. 1987, ApJ, 317, 733

1987
[13]

B., van Roestel, J., et al

Kupfer, T., Bauer, E. B., van Roestel, J., et al. 2022, ApJ, 92 5, L12

2022
[14]

& Tornambè, A

Limongi, M. & Tornambè, A. 1991, ApJ, 371, 317

1991
[15]

R., et al

Liu, Z.-W., Pakmor, R., Seitenzahl, I. R., et al. 2013, ApJ, 7 74, 37

2013
[16]

& Arnett, D

Livne, E. & Arnett, D. 1995, ApJ, 452, 62

1995
[17]

& Glasner, A

Livne, E. & Glasner, A. 1991, ApJ, 370, 272

1991
[18]

& Fuller, J

Ma, L. & Fuller, J. 2019, MNRAS, 488, 4338

2019
[19]

& Meynet, G

Maeder, A. & Meynet, G. 2004, A&A, 422, 225

2004
[20]

& Bruenn, S

Mezzacappa, A. & Bruenn, S. W. 1993, ApJ, 405, 669

1993
[21]

C., & Langer, N

Neunteufel, P ., Y oon, S. C., & Langer, N. 2017, A&A, 602, A55

2017
[22]

2023, Scien ce, 379, 300

Petitdemange, L., Marcotte, F., & Gissinger, C. 2023, Scien ce, 379, 300

2023
[23]

2024, A&A, 681, A75

Petitdemange, L., Marcotte, F., Gissinger, C., & Daniel, F. 2024, A&A, 681, A75

2024
[24]

2013, ApJ, 774 , 98

Piersanti, L., Cristallo, S., & Straniero, O. 2013, ApJ, 774 , 98

2013
[25]

Piersanti, L., Tornambé, A., & Y ungelson, L. R. 2014, MNRAS, 445, 3239

2014
[26]

R., & Bravo, E

Piersanti, L., Y ungelson, L. R., & Bravo, E. 2024, A&A, 689, A 287

2024
[27]

R., Cristallo, S., & Tornambé, A

Piersanti, L., Y ungelson, L. R., Cristallo, S., & Tornambé, A. 2019, MNRAS, 484, 950

2019
[28]

R., & Tornambé, A

Piersanti, L., Y ungelson, L. R., & Tornambé, A. 2015, MNRAS, 452, 2897

2015
[29]

S., Bauer, E

Rajamuthukumar, A. S., Bauer, E. B., Justham, S., et al. 2025 , A&A, 704, A82

2025
[30]

J., Boos, S

Shen, K. J., Boos, S. J., Townsley, D. M., & Kasen, D. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal, 922, 68

2021
[31]

Spruit, H. C. 1999, A&A, 349, 189

1999
[32]

Spruit, H. C. 2002, A&A, 381, 923

2002
[33]

2006, Nuclear Ph ysics A, 777, 311

Straniero, O., Gallino, R., & Cristallo, S. 2006, Nuclear Ph ysics A, 777, 311

2006
[34]

Tayler, R. J. 1973, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 161, 365

1973
[35]

J., et al

Teckenburg, P ., Kupfer, T., Brown, A. J., et al. 2025, arXiv e -prints, arXiv:2510.25653 V ennes, S., Kawka, A., O’Toole, S. J., Németh, P ., & Burton, D. 2012, ApJ, 759, L25

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[36]

A., Zimmerman, G

Weaver, T. A., Zimmerman, G. B., & Woosley, S. E. 1978, ApJ, 22 5, 1021

1978
[37]

Wong, T. L. S. & Bildsten, L. 2023, ApJ, 951, 28

2023
[38]

Wood, P . R. 1974, ApJ, 190, 609

1974
[39]

Woosley, S. E. & Weaver, T. A. 1994, ApJ, 423, 371 Y ungelson, L. R. 2008, Astronomy Letters, 34, 620

1994
[40]

S., & Mathis, S

Zahn, J.-P ., Brun, A. S., & Mathis, S. 2007, A&A, 474, 145 Article number, page 9 of 10 A&A proofs: manuscript no. ms Appendix A: Rotating model Table A.1. Selected properties of the rotating model during the H-accr etion phase. For each ﬂash episode we report the duration of t he accretion phase ( ∆T in Myr) the ignition density ( ρig in 10 3g·cm−3), th...

2007

[1] [1]

J., Townsley, D

Boos, S. J., Townsley, D. M., Shen, K. J., Caldwell, S., & Mile s, B. J. 2021, ApJ, 919, 126

2021

[2] [2]

2018, Mont hly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 482, 4346

Bravo, E., Badenes, C., & Martínez-Rodríguez, H. 2018, Mont hly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 482, 4346

2018

[3] [3]

2015, Ap J, 807, 74

Brooks, J., Bildsten, L., Marchant, P ., & Paxton, B. 2015, Ap J, 807, 74

2015

[4] [4]

1971, Ap&SS, 10,355

Castellani, V ., Giannone, P ., & Renzini, A. 1971, Ap&SS, 10,355

1971

[5] [5]

1928, Mathematische Annalen, 100, 32

Courant, R., Friedrichs, K., & Lewy, H. 1928, Mathematische Annalen, 100, 32

1928

[6] [6]

2009, ApJ, 696, 797 den Hartogh, J

Cristallo, S., Straniero, O., Gallino, R., et al. 2009, ApJ, 696, 797 den Hartogh, J. W., Eggenberger, P ., & Deheuvels, S. 2020, A&A, 634, L16

2009

[7] [7]

Denissenkov, P . A. & Pinsonneault, M. 2007, ApJ, 655, 1157

2007

[8] [8]

B., Kupfer, T., & Dorsch, M

Deshmukh, K., Bauer, E. B., Kupfer, T., & Dorsch, M. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 2072

2024

[9] [9]

Endal, A. S. & Soﬁa, S. 1978, ApJ, 220, 279

1978

[10] [10]

L., & Jermyn, A

Fuller, J., Piro, A. L., & Jermyn, A. S. 2019, MNRAS, 485, 3661

2019

[11] [11]

Hillman, Y ., Michaelis, A., & Perets, H. B. 2026, Journal of H igh Energy Astro- physics, 53, 100605

2026

[12] [12]

1987, ApJ, 317, 733

Itoh, N., Kohyama, Y ., & Takeuchi, H. 1987, ApJ, 317, 733

1987

[13] [13]

B., van Roestel, J., et al

Kupfer, T., Bauer, E. B., van Roestel, J., et al. 2022, ApJ, 92 5, L12

2022

[14] [14]

& Tornambè, A

Limongi, M. & Tornambè, A. 1991, ApJ, 371, 317

1991

[15] [15]

R., et al

Liu, Z.-W., Pakmor, R., Seitenzahl, I. R., et al. 2013, ApJ, 7 74, 37

2013

[16] [16]

& Arnett, D

Livne, E. & Arnett, D. 1995, ApJ, 452, 62

1995

[17] [17]

& Glasner, A

Livne, E. & Glasner, A. 1991, ApJ, 370, 272

1991

[18] [18]

& Fuller, J

Ma, L. & Fuller, J. 2019, MNRAS, 488, 4338

2019

[19] [19]

& Meynet, G

Maeder, A. & Meynet, G. 2004, A&A, 422, 225

2004

[20] [20]

& Bruenn, S

Mezzacappa, A. & Bruenn, S. W. 1993, ApJ, 405, 669

1993

[21] [21]

C., & Langer, N

Neunteufel, P ., Y oon, S. C., & Langer, N. 2017, A&A, 602, A55

2017

[22] [22]

2023, Scien ce, 379, 300

Petitdemange, L., Marcotte, F., & Gissinger, C. 2023, Scien ce, 379, 300

2023

[23] [23]

2024, A&A, 681, A75

Petitdemange, L., Marcotte, F., Gissinger, C., & Daniel, F. 2024, A&A, 681, A75

2024

[24] [24]

2013, ApJ, 774 , 98

Piersanti, L., Cristallo, S., & Straniero, O. 2013, ApJ, 774 , 98

2013

[25] [25]

Piersanti, L., Tornambé, A., & Y ungelson, L. R. 2014, MNRAS, 445, 3239

2014

[26] [26]

R., & Bravo, E

Piersanti, L., Y ungelson, L. R., & Bravo, E. 2024, A&A, 689, A 287

2024

[27] [27]

R., Cristallo, S., & Tornambé, A

Piersanti, L., Y ungelson, L. R., Cristallo, S., & Tornambé, A. 2019, MNRAS, 484, 950

2019

[28] [28]

R., & Tornambé, A

Piersanti, L., Y ungelson, L. R., & Tornambé, A. 2015, MNRAS, 452, 2897

2015

[29] [29]

S., Bauer, E

Rajamuthukumar, A. S., Bauer, E. B., Justham, S., et al. 2025 , A&A, 704, A82

2025

[30] [30]

J., Boos, S

Shen, K. J., Boos, S. J., Townsley, D. M., & Kasen, D. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal, 922, 68

2021

[31] [31]

Spruit, H. C. 1999, A&A, 349, 189

1999

[32] [32]

Spruit, H. C. 2002, A&A, 381, 923

2002

[33] [33]

2006, Nuclear Ph ysics A, 777, 311

Straniero, O., Gallino, R., & Cristallo, S. 2006, Nuclear Ph ysics A, 777, 311

2006

[34] [34]

Tayler, R. J. 1973, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 161, 365

1973

[35] [35]

J., et al

Teckenburg, P ., Kupfer, T., Brown, A. J., et al. 2025, arXiv e -prints, arXiv:2510.25653 V ennes, S., Kawka, A., O’Toole, S. J., Németh, P ., & Burton, D. 2012, ApJ, 759, L25

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

[36] [36]

A., Zimmerman, G

Weaver, T. A., Zimmerman, G. B., & Woosley, S. E. 1978, ApJ, 22 5, 1021

1978

[37] [37]

Wong, T. L. S. & Bildsten, L. 2023, ApJ, 951, 28

2023

[38] [38]

Wood, P . R. 1974, ApJ, 190, 609

1974

[39] [39]

Woosley, S. E. & Weaver, T. A. 1994, ApJ, 423, 371 Y ungelson, L. R. 2008, Astronomy Letters, 34, 620

1994

[40] [40]

S., & Mathis, S

Zahn, J.-P ., Brun, A. S., & Mathis, S. 2007, A&A, 474, 145 Article number, page 9 of 10 A&A proofs: manuscript no. ms Appendix A: Rotating model Table A.1. Selected properties of the rotating model during the H-accr etion phase. For each ﬂash episode we report the duration of t he accretion phase ( ∆T in Myr) the ignition density ( ρig in 10 3g·cm−3), th...

2007