Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 116 references

Bragg Interferometry of Moir\'e Superlattices: From Geometric Phase Principles to Atomic Reconstruction

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-14 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Bragg interferometry maps sub-angstrom atomic reconstruction across micron-scale moiré superlattices by fitting dark-field Bragg-disk interference.

desk verdict Solid methodological review that cleanly situates Bragg interferometry among geometric-phase and dark-field methods; useful for the subfield, no new data or claims that over-reach. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.09901 v1 pith:VTSORWU2 submitted 2026-07-10 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Isaac M. Craig , D. Kwabena Bediako This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords Bragginterferometrymoirésuperlatticesatomicreconstructiongeometricphase4D-STEMinterlayerdisplacementtwistedbilayergraphenetransitionmetaldichalcogenides
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Moiré superlattices of twisted two-dimensional materials are not rigid; interlayer forces and elasticity drive atomic reconstruction that reshapes electronic and chemical behavior. This review shows that Bragg interferometry extracts the local interlayer displacement field by fitting the intensity of overlapping dark-field Bragg disks to simple analytical forms of that displacement. The method is computationally light, works over large fields of view, and reaches buried or encapsulated interfaces that surface probes and bright-field geometric phase analysis cannot cleanly access. Case studies on twisted bilayer and trilayer graphene and on transition-metal dichalcogenide moirés illustrate how the measured displacement and strain maps reveal reconstruction regimes that control flat-band physics, electron-transfer rates, and encapsulation-dependent relaxation pathways. The paper also places the technique beside geometric phase analysis, CBED holography and ptychography, clarifying the shared geometric-phase principles and the practical trade-offs of incomplete dark-field phase information.

What carries the argument

The overlap-intensity formula (Eq. 9) that relates measured Bragg-disk intensity I_j(r) to the local interlayer displacement u(r) through cosine and sine terms of the projected geometric phase π g_j · u(r); fitting this expression at multiple reflections yields the full displacement map.

What would settle it

A controlled comparison on a known-thickness, heavy-atom bilayer in which multislice dynamical simulations predict intensity patterns that cannot be fit by the simple cosine form of Eq. 9, while a full ptychographic or CBED-holography reconstruction recovers a different displacement field.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Bragg interferometry recovers interlayer displacement fields and the resulting strain tensors in moiré materials by fitting the intensity of overlapping Bragg disks recorded in 4D-STEM dark-field patterns to analytical expressions that depend only on the relative in-plane displacement between layers, thereby enabling large-area maps of atomic reconstruction even inside encapsulated heterostructures.

Load-bearing premise

The intensities can be treated as arising from independent, weakly scattering layers whose free-space propagation can be ignored; if multiple scattering or strong specimen tilt dominate, the fitted displacement no longer equals the true atomic offset.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. This review surveys geometric-phase methods for mapping atomic reconstruction in moiré superlattices, with primary emphasis on Bragg interferometry (BI). BI is presented as a constrained dark-field approach that fits the intensity of overlapping Bragg disks in 4D-STEM CBED patterns to analytical forms of the interlayer displacement field u(r) (Eqs. 8–9), thereby extracting reconstruction-induced strain and stacking over large fields of view. The manuscript situates BI relative to geometric phase analysis, CBED holography, single-sideband and dark-field X-ray ptychography, and full electron ptychography, then illustrates its utility through published case studies of twisted bilayer graphene, twisted TMD bilayers/heterobilayers, and twisted trilayer graphene. Special attention is given to advantages for buried/encapsulated interfaces and to limitations arising from incomplete phase information, the weak-phase approximation, dynamical scattering, and specimen tilt.

Significance. If the comparative framing and the physical assumptions hold, the review supplies a timely, pedagogically useful synthesis for the rapidly expanding moiré community. It correctly identifies a practical gap—sub-ångström reconstruction mapping over micron-scale fields of view in encapsulated devices—and shows how BI addresses that gap more efficiently than full ptychography while retaining dark-field selectivity unavailable to bright-field GPA. The case studies (reconstruction regimes near the magic angle, encapsulation-dependent dilational pathways, second-neighbor coupling in trilayers) are drawn from independent experimental 4D-STEM datasets already in the literature; the present text does not invent new entities or circularly redefine fitted parameters as predictions. Explicit discussion of free parameters (origin offset Δγ, average lattice constant) and of the weak-phase/independent-scattering approximation further strengthens the contribution as a balanced methods review rather than an uncritical advocacy piece.

minor comments (5)
  1. Equation numbering is inconsistent: the text refers to “equation 1.10” when discussing the small impact of Δz, yet the displayed equations are numbered (1)–(9). Align the cross-references.
  2. Figure 2 caption and surrounding text use both “aberration-free” and “aberation-free”; standardize spelling.
  3. In the TMD section the text states “BI determined local rotational reconstruction … and and to separate”; remove the duplicated “and”.
  4. A short forward-looking sentence on how BI-derived strain maps could be quantitatively cross-validated against multislice-simulated CBED libraries would strengthen the Future Directions section without altering the central claim.
  5. The abstract and introduction correctly emphasize “incomplete phase information,” yet the main text could more explicitly flag that only the absolute value of the geometric phase is recovered (necessitating unwrapping), to match the clarity of the Limitations section.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

Methodological review; self-cited experimental case studies illustrate BI utility but do not force the intensity-to-u(r) mapping by construction or uniqueness theorem.

  1. self citation load bearing [Case studies sections (Twisted bilayer graphene; Twisted transition metal dichalcogenides; Twisted trilayer graphene) and associated figures]
    "We demonstrate the utility of Bragg interferometry through case studies of twisted bilayer and trilayer graphene as well as transition metal dichalcogenide moiré systems. … By fitting the overlap intensities associated with multiple graphene Bragg reflections, BI was used to obtain the local displacement field u(r) throughout the moiré lattice (Figure 4a)."

    The concrete claims of reconstruction regimes, dilational strain, encapsulation effects and trilayer stacking preferences rest exclusively on the authors’ own prior experimental papers. The citations are experimental (independent 4D-STEM data) rather than an unverified uniqueness theorem, so the circularity is minor and non-load-bearing for the methodological derivation itself.

full rationale

The paper is a review that derives the Bragg-interferometry intensity model from the weak-phase-object approximation (Eqs. 1–2, 8–9) and standard bilayer scattering, then fits experimental dark-field overlap intensities I_j(r) to extract interlayer displacement u(r). That extraction is an ordinary inverse problem under stated approximations; nothing is redefined in terms of the fitted u and then re-presented as an independent prediction. Comparative discussion of GPA, SSB ptychography, dark-field X-ray ptychography and CBED holography rests on the broader literature. The three case-study sections necessarily cite the authors’ own prior experimental papers ([36], [63], [64]) that contain independent 4D-STEM datasets; those citations supply illustrations of utility rather than a load-bearing uniqueness claim or an unverified premise. The Limitations section explicitly flags the weak-phase and tilt assumptions. No self-definitional loop, fitted-input-as-prediction, or ansatz-smuggled-via-citation is present. Score 1 reflects only the ordinary self-citation of the experimental demonstrations.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

As a review the paper inherits the standard kinematic/weak-phase scattering framework of electron diffraction and the geometric-phase definition of displacement. The only paper-specific modeling choices are the analytic forms used to fit BI intensities and the assumption that deformation is equally partitioned between layers when converting relative phase to absolute strain.

free parameters (2)
  • origin offset Δγ (or equivalent choice of stacking reference)
    Sets the zero of the displacement field u; chosen so that C(g) vanishes or so that AA stacking is the origin. Affects absolute stacking labels but not strain gradients.
  • average lattice constant used for absolute strain
    BI measures only relative geometric phase between layers; an external average lattice constant (from Bragg-peak positions or assumed bulk value) is required to convert to absolute strain tensors.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Weak-phase-object approximation: exit wave ≈ (1 + iσV)ψ0, multiple scattering neglected
    Used to derive the cosine intensity formula (Eq. 8–9); stated as valid for atomically thin samples but flagged as a limitation for thicker or heavier systems.
  • domain assumption Deformation is equally partitioned between the two (or more) layers when converting relative phase to absolute displacement/strain
    Required because only the difference u_top – u_bottom is measured; invoked throughout the strain-map sections.
  • domain assumption Out-of-plane separation Δz contributes negligibly to the observed fringe offset under the imaging conditions used
    Justifies dropping the free-space propagation term present in CBED holography; authors note the residual shift is too small to extract reliably.
  • standard math Standard Fourier relationship between geometric phase PG and displacement: PG = 2πG·u
    Common to GPA and all geometric-phase methods; used without re-derivation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Bragg Interferometry of Moir\'e Superlattices: From Geometric Phase Principles to Atomic Reconstruction." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VTSORWU2

@misc{pith2026260709901,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Bragg Interferometry of Moir\'e Superlattices: From Geometric Phase Principles to Atomic Reconstruction},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VTSORWU2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.09901}
}
read the original abstract

The emergence of moir\'e superlattices formed by twisting and stacking two-dimensional materials has created a need for characterization techniques capable of mapping sub-angstrom atomic reconstruction across micron-scale fields of view. This review surveys a suite of methodologies developed to extract geometric phases in electron microscopy and X-ray spectroscopy, with a primary focus on the interference of overlapping Bragg reflections in the dark field. We provide a comparative analysis of some established techniques, including geometric phase analysis, converged beam electron diffraction holography, and various ptychographic paradigms, culminating in a discussion of Bragg interferometry for measuring interlayer displacement fields and strain in moir\'e materials. We demonstrate the utility of Bragg interferometry through case studies of twisted bilayer and trilayer graphene as well as transition metal dichalcogenide moir\'e systems. Special attention is given to the unique advantages of this dark-field interferometric method for probing buried interfaces and encapsulated heterostructures, as well as the inherent challenges of interpreting incomplete phase information in the presence of dynamical scattering. By examining the physical principles underlying these approaches, this review highlights the conceptual similarities and practical trade-offs involved in high-resolution structural mapping of materials in which the interplay between structural relaxation and electronic behavior defines a scientific frontier at the nexus of modern condensed matter physics, nanomaterials engineering, and interfacial chemistry.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.09901 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Bilayer vdW moir´e superlattices. (a, b) Rigid lattice models of moir´e super￾lattices from (a) interlayer twist, θm, and (b) lattice constant difference, δ, in prototypical triangular lattice bilayers. The moir´e superlattice constant, λ, is depicted. (c, d) Rigid lattice models of (c) parallel, P (near 0◦ ), and (d) anti-parallel, AP (near 60◦ ), twisted bi￾layer TMD configurations. Below each set of rigid models … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Imaging Modes. (a,b) Schematics illustrating the detector set-up for conven￾tional TEM (a) and CBED (b). (c) Schematic for 4D-STEM, where a collection of CBED patterns are collected across a range of probe positions r. The convergence angle, α, of the beam controls the diffraction disk diameter. (d) Schematic illustrating the intensities I(k, q) (Equation 3) for an aberation-free probe. (e) Schematic illustrating th… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Bragg interferometry fitting routine. (a) Method for extracting local dis￾placement vectors u(r) = (ux, uy) from Bragg disk intensities, Ij . (b) 2D colorization scheme used to produce displacement maps from the fitted displacement vectors. Reproduced with permission from reference [36]. information, is the loss of phase information contained in the bright-field. BI can be thought of in the context of GPA as providi… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Mapping strain fields in tBG. (a) Displacement field maps for tBG at various moir´e twist angles, θm, using the colorization scheme in Figure 3b. (b) Maps of combined reconstruction rotation, θR, of both layers at each pixel for the regions shown in c. (c) Correspondin…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Rotational and dilational reconstruction in bilayer TMD moir´es. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Effects of hBN encapsulation on reconstruction. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: TTG stacking and CBED patterns. (a) Schematic illustrating the twist angle, θ, and layer numbering conventions used to label the graphene trilayers. (b) Illustra￾tions of various high-symmetry stacking configurations realized within tTG. (c) Schematic of 4D-STEM measur…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Imaging reconstruction in tTG. (a,d) Layer stacking schematics for two limiting configurations of tTG. (b,e,j) Legends illustrating how colour correlates with the average first- and second-order Bragg disc intensities. Overlaid points are the intensities of high-symmet…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

116 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    D., Vargas, P., Pacheco, M

    Su´ arez Morell, E., Correa, J. D., Vargas, P., Pacheco, M. & Barticevic, Z. Flat bands in slightly twisted bilayer graphene: Tight-binding calculations.Phys. Rev. B82, 121407(R) (2010)

    2010

  2. [2]

    Moir´ e bands in twisted double-layer graphene.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences108,12233–12237 (2011)

    Bistritzer & MacDonald. Moir´ e bands in twisted double-layer graphene.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences108,12233–12237 (2011)

    2011

  3. [3]

    Cao, Y.et al.Correlated insulator behaviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlattices.Nature556,80–84 (2018). 30

    2018

  4. [4]

    Nature556,43–50 (2018)

    Cao, Y.et al.Unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices. Nature556,43–50 (2018)

    2018

  5. [5]

    Chen, G.et al.Signatures of tunable superconductivity in a trilayer graphene moir´ e superlattice.Nature572,215–219 (2019)

    2019

  6. [6]

    Tran, K.et al.Evidence for moir´ e excitons in van der Waals heterostructures.Nature 567,71–75 (2019)

    2019

  7. [7]

    L.et al.Signatures of moir´ e-trapped valley excitons in MoSe 2/WSe2 heter- obilayers.Nature567,66–70 (2019)

    Seyler, K. L.et al.Signatures of moir´ e-trapped valley excitons in MoSe 2/WSe2 heter- obilayers.Nature567,66–70 (2019)

    2019

  8. [8]

    M.et al.Resonantly hybridized excitons in moir´ e superlattices in van der Waals heterostructures.Nature567,81–86 (2019)

    Alexeev, E. M.et al.Resonantly hybridized excitons in moir´ e superlattices in van der Waals heterostructures.Nature567,81–86 (2019)

    2019

Show all 116 references
  1. [9]

    Nature567,76–80 (2019)

    Jin, C.et al.Observation of moir´ e excitons in WSe2/WS2 heterostructure superlattices. Nature567,76–80 (2019)

    2019

  2. [10]

    Hao, Z.et al.Electric field–tunable superconductivity in alternating-twist magic-angle trilayer graphene.Science371,1133–1138 (2021)

    2021

  3. [11]

    Mater.19,1068–1073 (2020)

    Bai, Y.et al.Excitons in strain-induced one-dimensional moir´ e potentials at transition metal dichalcogenide heterojunctions.Nat. Mater.19,1068–1073 (2020)

    2020

  4. [12]

    Huang, D., Choi, J., Shih, C.-K. & Li, X. Excitons in semiconductor moir´ e superlat- tices.Nature Nanotechnology17,227–238 (2022)

    2022

  5. [13]

    Mak, K. F. & Shan, J. Semiconductor moir´ e materials.Nature Nanotechnology17, 686–696 (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    H.et al.Intralayer charge-transfer moir´ e excitons in van der Waals super- lattices.Nature609,52–57 (2022)

    Naik, M. H.et al.Intralayer charge-transfer moir´ e excitons in van der Waals super- lattices.Nature609,52–57 (2022)

    2022

  7. [15]

    Susarla, S.et al.Hyperspectral imaging of exciton confinement within a moir´ e unit cell with a subnanometer electron probe.Science378,1235–1239 (2022)

    2022

  8. [16]

    Nature628,522–526 (2024)

    Kang, K.et al.Evidence of the fractional quantum spin Hall effect in moir´ e MoTe 2. Nature628,522–526 (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    Yu, Y.et al.Tunable angle-dependent electrochemistry at twisted bilayer graphene with moir´ e flat bands.Nature Chemistry14,267–273 (2022). 31

    2022

  10. [18]

    & Bediako, D

    Yu, Y., Van Winkle, M. & Bediako, D. K. Tuning interfacial chemistry with twistron- ics.Trends in Chemistry4,857–859 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    Zhang, K.et al.Anomalous Interfacial Electron-Transfer Kinetics in Twisted Trilayer Graphene Caused by Layer-Specific Localization.ACS Central Science9,1119–1128 (2023)

    2023

  12. [20]

    & Bediako, D

    Van Winkle, M., Zhang, K. & Bediako, D. K. Nanoscale Structure and Interfacial Electrochemical Reactivity of Moir´ e-Engineered Atomic Layers.Accounts of Chemical Research58,415–427 (Feb. 2025)

    2025

  13. [21]

    Nature579,353–358 (2020)

    Tang, Y.et al.Simulation of Hubbard model physics in WSe 2/WS2 moir´ e superlattices. Nature579,353–358 (2020)

    2020

  14. [22]

    R., Efetov, D

    Balents, L., Dean, C. R., Efetov, D. K. & Young, A. F. Superconductivity and strong correlations in moir´ e flat bands.Nature Physics16,725–733 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    Xu, Y.et al.A tunable bilayer Hubbard model in twisted WSe2.Nature Nanotech- nology17,934–939 (2022)

    2022

  16. [24]

    & Limmer, D

    Coello Escalante, L. & Limmer, D. T. Microscopic Origin of Twist-Dependent Electron Transfer Rate in Bilayer Graphene.Nano Letters24,14868–14874 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    Maroo, S.et al.Electronic origin of reorganization energy in interfacial electron trans- fer.Nature653,98–103 (2026)

    2026

  18. [26]

    A., Ohuchi, F

    Parkinson, B. A., Ohuchi, F. S., Ueno, K. & Koma, A. Periodic lattice distortions as a result of lattice mismatch in epitaxial films of two-dimensional materials.Applied Physics Letters58,472–474 (1991)

    1991

  19. [27]

    S.et al.Strain solitons and topological defects in bilayer graphene.Proceed- ings of the National Academy of Sciences110,11256–11260 (2013)

    Alden, J. S.et al.Strain solitons and topological defects in bilayer graphene.Proceed- ings of the National Academy of Sciences110,11256–11260 (2013)

    2013

  20. [28]

    R.et al.Commensurate–incommensurate transition in graphene on hexag- onal boron nitride.Nature Physics10,451–456 (2014)

    Woods, C. R.et al.Commensurate–incommensurate transition in graphene on hexag- onal boron nitride.Nature Physics10,451–456 (2014)

    2014

  21. [29]

    Wijk, M. M. v., Schuring, A., Katsnelson, M. I. & Fasolino, A. Relaxation of moir´ epatterns for slightly misaligned identical lattices: graphene on graphite.2,034010 (2015)

    2015

  22. [30]

    & Srolovitz, D

    Dai, S., Xiang, Y. & Srolovitz, D. J. Twisted bilayer graphene: Moir´ e with a twist. Nano Lett.16,5923–5927 (2016). 32

    2016

  23. [31]

    Nam, N. N. T. & Koshino, M. Lattice relaxation and energy band modulation in twisted bilayer graphene.Physical Review B96,075311– (Aug. 2017)

    2017

  24. [32]

    & Tadmor, E

    Zhang, K. & Tadmor, E. B. Structural and electron diffraction scaling of twisted graphene bilayers.Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids112,225–238 (2018)

    2018

  25. [33]

    Carr, S.et al.Relaxation and domain formation in incommensurate two-dimensional heterostructures.Phys. Rev. B98,224102 (22 2018)

    2018

  26. [34]

    Mater.18,448–453 (2019)

    Yoo, H.et al.Atomic and electronic reconstruction at the van der Waals interface in twisted bilayer graphene.Nat. Mater.18,448–453 (2019)

    2019

  27. [35]

    Nanotechnol.15,592–597 (2020)

    Weston, A.et al.Atomic reconstruction in twisted bilayers of transition metal dichalco- genides.Nat. Nanotechnol.15,592–597 (2020)

    2020

  28. [36]

    P.et al.Strain fields in twisted bilayer graphene.Nature materials 20,956–963 (2021)

    Kazmierczak, N. P.et al.Strain fields in twisted bilayer graphene.Nature materials 20,956–963 (2021)

    2021

  29. [37]

    & Koshino, M

    Nakatsuji, N., Kawakami, T. & Koshino, M. Multi-scale lattice relaxation in chiral twisted trilayer graphenes.arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.13155(2023)

    2023 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Uri, A.et al.Mapping the twist-angle disorder and Landau levels in magic-angle graphene.Nature581,47–52 (2020)

    2020

  31. [39]

    H., Fu, Y., Das Sarma, S

    Wilson, J. H., Fu, Y., Das Sarma, S. & Pixley, J. H. Disorder in twisted bilayer graphene.Physical Review Research2,023325– (June 2020)

    2020

  32. [40]

    N., Bockrath, M

    Lau, C. N., Bockrath, M. W., Mak, K. F. & Zhang, F. Reproducibility in the fabrica- tion and physics of moir´ e materials.Nature602,41–50 (2022)

    2022

  33. [41]

    Physical Review Letters120,156405– (Apr

    Huder, L.et al.Electronic Spectrum of Twisted Graphene Layers under Heterostrain. Physical Review Letters120,156405– (Apr. 2018)

    2018

  34. [42]

    Bi, Z., Yuan, N. F. Q. & Fu, L. Designing flat bands by strain.Physical Review B 100,035448– (July 2019)

    2019

  35. [43]

    Kerelsky, A.et al.Maximized electron interactions at the magic angle in twisted bilayer graphene.Nature572,95–100 (2019)

    2019

  36. [44]

    O.et al.High-resolution three-dimensional structural microscopy by single-angle Bragg ptychography.Nature materials16,244–251 (2017)

    Hruszkewycz, S. O.et al.High-resolution three-dimensional structural microscopy by single-angle Bragg ptychography.Nature materials16,244–251 (2017). 33

    2017

  37. [45]

    X-ray ptychography.Nature Photonics12,9–17 (2018)

    Pfeiffer, F. X-ray ptychography.Nature Photonics12,9–17 (2018)

    2018

  38. [46]

    Kim, C.et al.Three-dimensional imaging of phase ordering in an Fe-Al alloy by Bragg ptychography.Physical Review Letters121,256101 (2018)

    2018

  39. [47]

    Takahashi, Y.et al.Bragg x-ray ptychography of a silicon crystal: Visualization of the dislocation strain field and the production of a vortex beam.Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics87,121201 (2013)

    2013

  40. [48]

    & Ciston, J

    Ophus, C., Ercius, P., Sarahan, M., Czarnik, C. & Ciston, J. Recording and using 4D- STEM datasets in materials science.Microscopy and Microanalysis20,62–63 (2014)

    2014

  41. [49]

    Four-dimensional scanning transmission electron microscopy (4D-STEM): From scanning nanodiffraction to ptychography and beyond.Microscopy and Micro- analysis25,563–582 (2019)

    Ophus, C. Four-dimensional scanning transmission electron microscopy (4D-STEM): From scanning nanodiffraction to ptychography and beyond.Microscopy and Micro- analysis25,563–582 (2019)

    2019

  42. [50]

    & Rodenburg, J

    Humphry, M., Kraus, B., Hurst, A., Maiden, A. & Rodenburg, J. Ptychographic elec- tron microscopy using high-angle dark-field scattering for sub-nanometre resolution imaging.Nature communications3,730 (2012)

    2012

  43. [51]

    J.et al.Efficient phase contrast imaging in STEM using a pixelated detector

    Pennycook, T. J.et al.Efficient phase contrast imaging in STEM using a pixelated detector. Part 1: Experimental demonstration at atomic resolution.Ultramicroscopy 151,160–167 (2015)

    2015

  44. [52]

    Gao, S.et al.Electron ptychographic microscopy for three-dimensional imaging.Na- ture Communications8,163 (2017)

    2017

  45. [53]

    Jiang, Y.et al.Electron ptychography of 2D materials to deep sub-˚ angstr¨ om resolu- tion.Nature559,343–349 (2018)

    2018

  46. [54]

    Chen, Z.et al.Mixed-state electron ptychography enables sub-angstrom resolution imaging with picometer precision at low dose.Nature communications11,2994 (2020)

    2020

  47. [55]

    Yang, W., Sha, H., Cui, J., Mao, L. & Yu, R. Local-orbital ptychography for ultrahigh- resolution imaging.Nature Nanotechnology,1–6 (2024)

    2024

  48. [56]

    M., Qiu, W

    Pelz, P. M., Qiu, W. X., B¨ ucker, R., Kassier, G. & Miller, R. D. Low-dose cryo electron ptychography via non-convex Bayesian optimization.Scientific reports7,9883 (2017)

    2017

  49. [57]

    Chen, Z.et al.Electron ptychography achieves atomic-resolution limits set by lattice vibrations.Science372,826–831 (2026/07/04 2021). 34

    2026

  50. [58]

    & Kilaas, R

    H¨ ytch, M., Snoeck, E. & Kilaas, R. Quantitative measurement of displacement and strain fields from HREM micrographs.Ultramicroscopy74,131–146 (1998)

    1998

  51. [59]

    P´ asztor, ´A.et al.Holographic imaging of the complex charge density wave order parameter.Physical Review Research1,033114– (Nov. 2019)

    2019

  52. [60]

    P´ asztor, ´A.et al.Multiband charge density wave exposed in a transition metal dichalco- genide.Nature Communications12,6037 (2021)

    2021

  53. [61]

    & Renner, C

    P´ asztor, ´A., Pushkarna, I. & Renner, C. Delusive chirality and periodic strain pattern in moir´ esystems.11,035017 (2024)

    2024

  54. [62]

    Ke, X., Zhang, M., Zhao, K. & Su, D. Moir´ eFringe Method via Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy.Small Methods6,2101040 (2026/07/04 2022)

    2026

  55. [63]

    Van Winkle, M.et al.Rotational and dilational reconstruction in transition metal dichalcogenide moir´ e bilayers.Nature communications14,2989 (2023)

    2023

  56. [64]

    M.et al.Local atomic stacking and symmetry in twisted graphene trilayers

    Craig, I. M.et al.Local atomic stacking and symmetry in twisted graphene trilayers. Nature Materials,1–8 (2024)

    2024

  57. [65]

    M., Van Winkle, M., Ophus, C

    Craig, I. M., Van Winkle, M., Ophus, C. & Bediako, D. K. Considerations for extract- ing moir´ e-level strain from dark field intensities in transmission electron microscopy. Journal of Applied Physics136,074301 (2024)

    2024

  58. [66]

    & Knoll, M

    Ruska, E. & Knoll, M. Die magnetische Sammelspule f¨ ur schnelle Elektronenstrahlen. The magnetic concentrating coil for fast electron beams.) Z. techn. Physik12,389–400 (1931)

    1931

  59. [67]

    ¨Uber einige Fehler von Elektronenlinsen.Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik101,593– 603 (1936)

    Scherzer, O. ¨Uber einige Fehler von Elektronenlinsen.Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik101,593– 603 (1936)

    1936

  60. [68]

    The theoretical resolution limit of the electron microscope.Journal of Applied Physics20,20–29 (1949)

    Scherzer, O. The theoretical resolution limit of the electron microscope.Journal of Applied Physics20,20–29 (1949)

    1949

  61. [69]

    Faruqi, A. R. & McMullan, G. Electronic detectors for electron microscopy.44,357– 390 (2011)

    2011

  62. [70]

    Levin, B. D. A. Direct detectors and their applications in electron microscopy for materials science.4,042005 (2021). 35

    2021

  63. [71]

    & Maiden, A

    Rodenburg, J. & Maiden, A. inSpringer Handbook of Microscopy(eds Hawkes, P. W. & Spence, J. C. H.) 819–904 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019).isbn: 978-3-030-00069-1.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00069-1_17

    2019 doi

  64. [72]

    & Yang, C

    Zheng, G., Shen, C., Jiang, S., Song, P. & Yang, C. Concept, implementations and applications of Fourier ptychography.Nature Reviews Physics3,207–223 (2021)

    2021

  65. [73]

    Ptychography: A brief introduction.Journal of Microscopy300,153– 155 (2026/07/04 2025)

    Rodenburg, J. Ptychography: A brief introduction.Journal of Microscopy300,153– 155 (2026/07/04 2025)

    2026

  66. [74]

    & Nellist, P

    Clark, L. & Nellist, P. D.Electron Ptychography2025. arXiv:2503.10917 [physics.optics]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.10917

    arXiv

  67. [75]

    Computational microscopy with coherent diffractive imaging and ptychogra- phy.Nature637,281–295 (2025)

    Miao, J. Computational microscopy with coherent diffractive imaging and ptychogra- phy.Nature637,281–295 (2025)

    2025

  68. [76]

    Wang, T.et al.Optical ptychography for biomedical imaging: recent progress and future directions [Invited].Biomedical Optics Express14,489–532 (2023)

    2023

  69. [77]

    Beugung im inhomogenen Prim¨ arstrahlwellenfeld

    Hoppe, W. Beugung im inhomogenen Prim¨ arstrahlwellenfeld. I. Prinzip einer Phasen- messung von Elektronenbeungungsinterferenzen.Acta Crystallographica Section A25, 495–501 (July 1969)

    1969

  70. [78]

    & Hoppe, W

    Hegerl, R. & Hoppe, W. Dynamische theorie der kristallstrukturanalyse durch elektro- nenbeugung im inhomogenen prim¨ arstrahlwellenfeld.Berichte der Bunsengesellschaft f¨ ur physikalische Chemie74,1148–1154 (1970)

    1970

  71. [79]

    & Nellist, P

    Rodenburg, J., McCallum, B. & Nellist, P. Experimental tests on double-resolution coherent imaging via STEM.Ultramicroscopy48,304–314 (1993)

    1993

  72. [80]

    & Takahashi, Y

    Suzuki, A., Shimomura, K., Hirose, M., Burdet, N. & Takahashi, Y. Dark-field X- ray ptychography: Towards high-resolution imaging of thick and unstained biological specimens.Scientific reports6,35060 (2016)

    2016

  73. [81]

    W.et al.High dynamic range pixel array detector for scanning transmission electron microscopy.Microscopy and Microanalysis22,237–249 (2016)

    Tate, M. W.et al.High dynamic range pixel array detector for scanning transmission electron microscopy.Microscopy and Microanalysis22,237–249 (2016)

    2016

  74. [82]

    Latychevskaia, T.et al.Convergent beam electron holography for analysis of van der Waals heterostructures.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.115,7473–7478 (2018). 36

    2018

  75. [83]

    A.et al.Imaging moir´ e deformation and dynamics in twisted bilayer graphene.Nature Communications13,70 (2022)

    De Jong, T. A.et al.Imaging moir´ e deformation and dynamics in twisted bilayer graphene.Nature Communications13,70 (2022)

    2022

  76. [84]

    A New Microscopic Principle.Nature161,777–778 (1948)

    Gabor, D. A New Microscopic Principle.Nature161,777–778 (1948)

    1948

  77. [85]

    J.et al.Interferometric 4D-STEM for lattice distortion and interlayer spacing measurements of bilayer and trilayer 2D materials.Small17,2100388 (2021)

    Zachman, M. J.et al.Interferometric 4D-STEM for lattice distortion and interlayer spacing measurements of bilayer and trilayer 2D materials.Small17,2100388 (2021)

    2021

  78. [86]

    K., Juriˇ ci´ c, V

    Jain, S. K., Juriˇ ci´ c, V. & Barkema, G. T. Structure of twisted and buckled bilayer graphene.4,015018 (2017)

    2017

  79. [87]

    & Bernevig, B

    T¨ orm¨ a, P., Peotta, S. & Bernevig, B. A. Superconductivity, superfluidity and quantum geometry in twisted multilayer systems.Nature Reviews Physics4,528–542 (2022)

    2022

  80. [88]

    R.et al.Twist angle-dependent atomic reconstruction and moir´ e patterns in transition metal dichalcogenide heterostructures.ACS Nano14,4550– 4558 (2020)

    Rosenberger, M. R.et al.Twist angle-dependent atomic reconstruction and moir´ e patterns in transition metal dichalcogenide heterostructures.ACS Nano14,4550– 4558 (2020)

    2020

  81. [89]

    Mater.20,945–950 (2021)

    Li, H.et al.Imaging moir´ e flat bands in three-dimensional reconstructed WSe 2/WS2 superlattices.Nat. Mater.20,945–950 (2021)

    2021

  82. [90]

    H.et al.Torsional Periodic Lattice Distortions and Diffraction of Twisted 2D Materials.arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.06510(2022)

    Sung, S. H.et al.Torsional Periodic Lattice Distortions and Diffraction of Twisted 2D Materials.arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.06510(2022)

    2022 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Phys.17,720–725 (2021)

    Shabani, S.et al.Deep moir´ e potentials in twisted transition metal dichalcogenide bilayers.Nat. Phys.17,720–725 (2021)

    2021

  84. [92]

    Commun.12,1–7 (2021)

    Li, E.et al.Lattice reconstruction induced multiple ultra-flat bands in twisted bilayer WSe2.Nat. Commun.12,1–7 (2021)

    2021

  85. [93]

    H., Kundu, S., Maity, I

    Naik, M. H., Kundu, S., Maity, I. & Jain, M. Origin and evolution of ultraflat bands in twisted bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides: Realization of triangular quantum dots.Phys. Rev. B102,075413 (2020)

    2020

  86. [94]

    Naik, M. H. & Jain, M. Ultraflatbands and shear solitons in moir´ e patterns of twisted bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides.Phys. Rev. Lett.121,266401 (2018)

    2018

  87. [95]

    & Fal’ko, V

    Enaldiev, V., Z´ olyomi, V., Yelgel, C., Magorrian, S. & Fal’ko, V. Stacking domains and dislocation networks in marginally twisted bilayers of transition metal dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. Lett.124,206101 (2020). 37

    2020

  88. [96]

    & Fal’ko, V

    Ferreira, F., Magorrian, S., Enaldiev, V., Ruiz-Tijerina, D. & Fal’ko, V. Band energy landscapes in twisted homobilayers of transition metal dichalcogenides.Appl. Phys. Lett.118,241602 (2021)

    2021

  89. [97]

    Jinet al.Probing moir´ e excitons in van der Waals heterostructures.Nature567,76– 80 (2019)

    2019

  90. [98]

    Zhang, Mao, Cao,et al.Moir´ e excitons in van der Waals heterostructures.Nature Communications11,5888 (2020)

    2020

  91. [99]

    Zhang, N.et al.Moir´ e intralayer excitons in a MoSe 2/MoS2 heterostructure.Nano Letters18,7651–7657 (2018)

    2018

  92. [100]

    Tranet al.Signature of moir´ e excitons in van der Waals heterostructures.Nature567, 71–75 (2019)

    2019

  93. [101]

    Topological exciton bands in moir´ e heterojunctions.Phys- ical Review Letters118,147401 (2017)

    Wu, Lovorn & MacDonald. Topological exciton bands in moir´ e heterojunctions.Phys- ical Review Letters118,147401 (2017)

    2017

  94. [102]

    Dandu, M.et al.Electrically tunable localized versus delocalized intralayer moir´ e excitons and trions in a twisted MoS 2 bilayer.ACS Nano16,8983–8992 (2022)

    2022

  95. [103]

    Nature606,494–500 (2022)

    Kim, H.et al.Evidence for unconventional superconductivity in twisted trilayer graphene. Nature606,494–500 (2022)

    2022

  96. [104]

    M., Cao, Y., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T

    Park, J. M., Cao, Y., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T. & Jarillo-Herrero, P. Tunable strongly coupled superconductivity in magic-angle twisted trilayer graphene.Nature 590,249–255 (2021)

    2021

  97. [105]

    & Kaxiras, E

    Zhu, Z., Carr, S., Massatt, D., Luskin, M. & Kaxiras, E. Twisted trilayer graphene: A precisely tunable platform for correlated electrons.Physical review letters125,116404 (2020)

    2020

  98. [106]

    C˘ alug˘ aru, D.et al.Twisted symmetric trilayer graphene: Single-particle and many- body Hamiltonians and hidden nonlocal symmetries of trilayer moir´ e systems with and without displacement field.Physical Review B103,195411 (2021)

    2021

  99. [107]

    S., Pacheco, M., Chico, L

    Morell, E. S., Pacheco, M., Chico, L. & Brey, L. Electronic properties of twisted trilayer graphene.Physical Review B87,125414 (2013). 38

    2013

  100. [108]

    Turkel, S.et al.Orderly disorder in magic-angle twisted trilayer graphene.Science 376,193–199 (2022)

    2022

  101. [109]

    T., Pantale´ on, P

    Phong, V. T., Pantale´ on, P. A., Cea, T. & Guinea, F. Band structure and supercon- ductivity in twisted trilayer graphene.Physical Review B104,L121116 (2021)

    2021

  102. [110]

    Nature620,762–767 (2023)

    Uri, A.et al.Superconductivity and strong interactions in a tunable moir´ equasicrystal. Nature620,762–767 (2023)

    2023

  103. [111]

    & Yang, B.-J

    Ahn, J., Park, S. & Yang, B.-J. Failure of Nielsen-Ninomiya theorem and fragile topol- ogy in two-dimensional systems with space-time inversion symmetry: application to twisted bilayer graphene at magic angle.Physical Review X9,021013 (2019)

    2019

  104. [112]

    Song, Z.et al.All magic angles in twisted bilayer graphene are topological.Physical review letters123,036401 (2019)

    2019

  105. [113]

    & Bernevig, B

    Mora, C., Regnault, N. & Bernevig, B. A. Flatbands and perfect metal in trilayer moir´ e graphene.Physical review letters123,026402 (2019)

    2019

  106. [114]

    M.et al.Robust superconductivity in magic-angle multilayer graphene family

    Park, J. M.et al.Robust superconductivity in magic-angle multilayer graphene family. Nature Materials21,877–883 (2022)

    2022

  107. [115]

    & Ledwith, P.Four Moir´ e materials at One Magic Angle in Helical Quadrilayer Graphene2025

    Fujimoto, M., Nakatsuji, N., Vishwanath, A. & Ledwith, P.Four Moir´ e materials at One Magic Angle in Helical Quadrilayer Graphene2025. arXiv:2510.02444 [cond-mat.str-el]

  108. [116]

    Han, T.et al.Correlated insulator and Chern insulators in pentalayer rhombohedral- stacked graphene.Nature Nanotechnology19,181–187 (2024). 39

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed July 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.