Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Ultralong-range Rydberg molecules of Hg atoms

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Mercury atoms can form ultralong-range Rydberg molecules whose valence-electron spins entangle across nanometre distances, the paper shows.

desk verdict First Rydberg-molecule treatment for a divalent atom; the Hg*Rb spin-entanglement proposal is the strong part, while the Hg*Hg metastable lifetimes rest on an extrapolated scattering input. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.05025 v1 pith:VUJXLDR4 submitted 2024-12-06 physics.atom-ph quant-ph

Agata Wojciechowska , Micha{l} Tomza , Matthew T. Eiles This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-phquant-ph
keywords ultralong-rangeRydbergmoleculesmercuryatomsdivalentspinentanglementFermipseudopotentialelectronscatteringphaseshiftsmetastablemolecularresonanceshyperfinesplitting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper extends the theory of ultralong-range Rydberg molecules—molecules in which a ground-state atom binds to a Rydberg atom through the low-energy scattering of the Rydberg electron—to atoms with two valence electrons, using mercury as the concrete example. It derives a pseudopotential Hamiltonian that carries the spin coupling of the electron scattering and the extra valence electron, then diagonalizes it for Hg*Rb and Hg*Hg. For Hg*Rb it predicts that at $n=36$ the energy splitting between the mercury ${}^1S_0$ and ${}^3S_1$ Rydberg terms matches the $6.835$ GHz hyperfine splitting of ${}^{87}$Rb, producing molecular states with mixed singlet/triplet and $f=1/f=2$ character, that is, entanglement between the valence spins of two atoms separated by roughly $200$ nm. For Hg*Hg it predicts metastable molecular states above the dissociation threshold, trapped between repulsive barriers, with one computed lifetime of about $1200$ ns. If these predictions hold, divalent Rydberg atoms become a route to remote spin-flip operations and Rydberg-molecule spectroscopy becomes a probe of low-energy electron–mercury scattering.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is a frame-transformed Fermi pseudopotential: the standard contact interaction of Eq. (5), generalized to higher partial waves by Omont, recast in zero-rank tensor form so that the electron–perturber scattering lengths and volumes depend on the total angular momentum $J_p$ of the electron–atom complex. A frame-transformation matrix $A_{\alpha\beta}$ in Eq. (7) couples the asymptotic Rydberg basis to the scattering basis and converts Rydberg wavefunctions, built from Whittaker functions, into molecular potential curves; gradients of the wavefunction at the perturber generate the trilobite and butterfly channels. The spin-entanglement effect itself comes from the matching of the quantum-defect-determined singlet–triplet splitting to the Rb hyperfine splitting, which the molecular basis explicitly includes through the perturber quantum numbers $|m_{s_2}m_{i_2}\rangle$ and the hyperfine term $A\hat{i}_2\cdot\hat{s}_2$.

What would settle it

Measure the Hg*Hg molecular spectrum in an ultracold mercury gas by two-photon photoassociation and look for the predicted resonance above the dissociation threshold with a lifetime around 1200 ns; a missing resonance or a lifetime orders of magnitude shorter would show the extrapolated e–Hg scattering input is wrong. Independently, resolve the Hg*Rb spectrum near $n=36$ and check for the predicted mixed singlet–triplet, $f=1/f=2$ eigenstates; their absence would rule out the quantum-defect/hyperfine matching mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the Fermi pseudopotential description of ultralong-range Rydberg molecules can be generalized to a divalent, single-channel Rydberg atom by including the spin of the residual valence electron and the spin–orbit coupling of the electron scattering, and that mercury realizes this cleanly because its Rydberg series is essentially single-channel. In Hg*Rb, the calculated potential curves show the singlet–triplet splitting of the Hg Rydberg atom being tuned by $n$ so that at $n=36$ it nearly equals the Rb hyperfine splitting; the molecular eigenstates then take the form $\alpha_1(R)|{}^1S_0\rangle|f=1\rangle + \alpha_2(R)|{}^3S_1\rangle|f=2\rangle$, so a two-photon excitation from a spin-polarized $f=2$ Rb gas produces a state in which the Rb spin flips to $f=1$ and the Hg valence electron flips from triplet to singlet, entangling the two distant valence electrons. In Hg*Hg, the positive s-wave scattering length makes the long-range interaction repulsive, yet the oscillatory electron density can trap the ground-state atom between repulsive barriers above the dissociation threshold; the calculated potential curves support metastable resonances, including one with a lifetime around $1200$ ns, while s- and p-wave competition at shorter range can bind true molecular states. All of these results follow from a single Hamiltonian whose frame transformation is written for an arbitrary divalent Rydberg atom.

Load-bearing premise

The quantitative predictions for the homonuclear states rest on the low-energy electron–mercury scattering phase shifts, which the paper takes from an external calculation and linearly extrapolates to zero energy; if the extrapolated p-wave scattering volume is inaccurate, the predicted Hg*Hg resonances and the roughly 1200 ns lifetime would shift, split, or disappear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At $n=36$, Hg*Rb molecules can be excited whose electronic wavefunction is a coherent mixture of ${}^1S_0|f=1\rangle$ and ${}^3S_1|f=2\rangle$, enabling a remote spin flip of the Rb atom's valence electron over distances of about $200$ nm.
  • The Hg*Hg molecule supports metastable vibrational states above the dissociation threshold, including a resonance with a lifetime of roughly $1200$ ns, which could be observed as sharp features in photoassociation or scattering experiments.
  • The binding energies and lifetimes of the Hg*Hg states are highly sensitive to the e–Hg scattering phase shifts, making Rydberg-molecule spectroscopy a practical way to extract low-energy electron–mercury scattering information.
  • The same theoretical treatment applies to any divalent Rydberg atom whose Rydberg series is essentially single-channel, not only mercury, so the spin-entanglement mechanism is a general feature of such molecules.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the same resonance condition should be reachable with other divalent Rydberg atoms such as Sr or Yb paired with an alkali perturber, because only the quantum defects and the perturber hyperfine constant enter the matching condition.
  • Beyond the paper, the metastable Hg*Hg resonances sit near an oscillatory potential and resemble bound states in the continuum; an ultracold-gas scattering experiment could detect them as sharp loss features, directly testing the extrapolated scattering input.
  • Beyond the paper, a measured value of the ~1200 ns lifetime would fix the low-energy p-wave scattering volume of e–Hg more tightly than the interpolation used here, since the resonance position and width depend on that volume.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper extends the theory of ultralong-range Rydberg molecules to include the spin coupling of the residual valence electron in a divalent Rydberg atom, using mercury as the test case. The authors derive a frame-transformation Hamiltonian with spin-orbit-coupled electron-atom scattering (Appendix), diagonalize it for Hg*Rb and Hg*Hg, and present potential energy curves. For Hg*Rb at n=36, they find near-degeneracy between the Hg singlet-triplet Rydberg splitting and the 87Rb hyperfine splitting, producing mixed states of the form |1S0>|f=1> + |3S1>|f=2> (Eq. 9), which they interpret as long-range spin entanglement and a remote spin flip. For Hg*Hg at n=25, they predict repulsive-dominated curves with metastable resonances above the dissociation threshold, reporting a lifetime of about 1200 ns for one such state, plus butterfly-well bound states below threshold.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper would be the first theoretical treatment of ultralong-range Rydberg molecules with a divalent atom whose residual valence electron participates in spin entanglement, and it would extend the Rydberg-molecule toolbox to a new species. The central Hg*Rb proposal rests on measured Hg quantum defects (Table I) and the known Rb hyperfine splitting, so it is not fitted to the target outcome and yields a concrete, falsifiable prediction at n=36. The paper also provides a detailed first-principles derivation (Appendix) and makes qualitative predictions for a homonuclear system with unusual above-threshold resonances. The main weaknesses are that the quantitative Hg*Hg claims depend on a linearly extrapolated e-Hg p-wave scattering volume without uncertainty propagation, and that the specific claim of entanglement between the two valence-electron spins requires scrutiny of the subsystem partition. These are fixable but load-bearing for the paper's strongest statements.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III.A, Eq. (9)] The paper states in Sec. I that the Rydberg electron 'can mediate an interaction between the residual valence electron of the divalent Rydberg atom and the valence electron of the ground-state atom' and in Sec. IV that this produces 'entanglement between the spins of the valence atoms of the two atomic cores.' However, the state in Eq. (9) is a superposition of the Hg Rydberg term (S=0 or 1, involving both the Rydberg electron s1 and the core electron sc) and the Rb hyperfine state (f=1 or 2, involving both the Rb electron s2 and the nuclear spin i2). Tracing out the Rydberg electron and the Rb nuclear spin leaves the reduced state of (sc, s2) as a convex mixture of product states, which is separable. The entanglement actually resides between the combined electron-spin sector of the Hg atom (including the Rydberg electron) and the total hyperfine sector of the Rb atom. The authors should either clarify this bipartition explicitly or demonstrate, e.g., via a negativity or concurrence calculation, that the two valence-electron spins alone are entangled. As written, the central claim of valence-electron spin entanglement is overstated and needs correction.
  2. [Sec. II.B, Fig. 2; Sec. III.B, Fig. 5] The quantitative predictions for the homonuclear Hg*Hg molecule are built on e-Hg scattering phase shifts from Ref. [67] that are reported up to k ≈ 1 a0^-1, whereas the relevant scattering momentum for n=25 is k ≈ 0.04 a0^-1. The authors linearly extrapolate the phase shifts to zero energy and interpolate with effective range theory, but no uncertainty is propagated. The paper itself acknowledges in Sec. III.B that the binding energies and stability of these molecular states are 'highly sensitive to small changes in the scattering phase shifts.' This is a particular concern for the metastable resonance with lifetime 'around 1200 ns' (Fig. 5, lower inset) and for the butterfly-well bound states (upper inset): a modest error in the extrapolated p-wave scattering volume could shift, split, or destroy these features. The authors should either provide a sensitivity analysis over the extrapolation parameters or reframe the Hg*Hg results as qualitative, to avoid overclaiming numerical accuracy.
  3. [Sec. III.B, stabilization method] The lifetime estimate of approximately 1200 ns is reported without error bars, convergence parameters, or details of the stabilization calculation (box sizes, number of eigenvalues binned, Lorentzian fit quality). Given that the same section emphasizes the extreme sensitivity of the resonances to the scattering input, the lifetime value should be accompanied by at least an estimated uncertainty from the stabilization procedure and from the scattering-phase-shift extrapolation. A statement of the range of lifetimes obtained when varying the p-wave scattering volume within a plausible interval would make the claim reproducible and honest about its confidence level.
minor comments (4)
  1. [General] There are several typos: 'Clebsh-Gordan' in Eq. (7), 'resepctively' in the Appendix, 'Physysical Review A' in Ref. [17], and the fragment 'From this, confirmed that the lifetime' in Sec. III.B (missing subject 'we'). These should be corrected.
  2. [Sec. II.B] The sentence 'The mentioned scattering phase shifts on both Rb and Hg are Jp-dependent' is awkward; consider 'The scattering phase shifts for both Rb and Hg are Jp-dependent.'
  3. [Fig. 4] Panels (d) and (e) share the same R axis, but the panel labels and the percentages shown in the color code are not fully defined in the caption. Please specify what the percentages represent (e.g., the squared amplitudes |α1|^2 and |α2|^2) and ensure the color scale is consistent across panels.
  4. [Sec. III.A] The discussion of the Rb2 remote spin flip (Ref. [76]) would benefit from a sentence clarifying how the present Hg-based mechanism differs, since in Rb2 there is no residual core electron whose spin is coupled to the Rydberg electron. This would sharpen the claimed novelty.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the predicted spin-entanglement degeneracy and metastable resonances are unconstrained outcomes of measured quantum defects and published scattering phase shifts.

full rationale

I walked the derivation chain. The Hamiltonian (Eqs. 3–8) is built from three inputs: (i) measured Hg quantum defects from Refs. [20–23], (ii) published e+Hg and e+Rb scattering phase shifts from Refs. [66,67] with a linear extrapolation to zero energy, and (iii) the Eiles–Greene frame-transformation formalism [36], which is rederived in the Appendix. The n=36 singlet-triplet versus Rb-hyperfine degeneracy (Fig. 4, Eq. 9) is not adjusted to produce spin entanglement; it follows from the measured quantum-defect difference (Table I: 3S1 0.6943 vs 1S0 0.6484) and the fixed 6.835 GHz Rb hyperfine splitting, matching only because the defect difference of 0.0459 divided by n^3 at n=36 gives roughly 6.5 GHz. The Hg*Hg metastable resonances and the 1200 ns lifetime emerge from diagonalizing the same Hamiltonian with a positive s-wave scattering length (1.87 a0) and the p-wave scattering volume; no resonance parameter is fitted to a target energy or lifetime. The only author-overlap citation is Ref. [36] (Eiles and Greene), but the paper rederives the transformation in the Appendix, so the citation is methodological, not load-bearing. The authors' own statement that the Hg*Hg binding energies are 'highly sensitive to small changes in the scattering phase shifts' is an honest input-sensitivity caveat, not a circular reduction: changing the extrapolated p-wave volume would degrade accuracy but would not make the derivation depend on its conclusion. No equation reduces to another by construction, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The calculation introduces no fitted parameters; all numerical inputs are external experimental quantum defects (Table I) and previously computed scattering phase shifts (Refs [66,67]). The main load-bearing assumptions are the single-channel, n-independent description of Hg Rydberg states, the restriction to s- and p-wave Fermi pseudopotential scattering, the accuracy of the extrapolated e-Hg phase shifts, and the Born-Oppenheimer fixed-perturber picture. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Hg Rydberg states are well described in a single-channel, LS-coupled picture with n-independent quantum defects for n>20.
    Invoked in Sec. II.A-B and Eq. (4); if channel coupling or n-dependence is significant, the potential curves and the n=36 singlet-triplet degeneracy change.
  • domain assumption The Fermi pseudopotential restricted to s- and p-wave scattering, with Jp-dependent and k-dependent scattering lengths and volumes, captures the electron-perturber interaction.
    Used in Eq. (5) and the Appendix; standard for Rydberg molecules but neglects higher partial waves and nonlocal effects.
  • domain assumption The e-Hg and e-Rb scattering phase shifts from Refs [66,67], including the linear extrapolation to zero energy, are accurate enough for quantitative potential curves.
    Sec. II.B and Fig. 2; the authors themselves note that Hg*Hg states are highly sensitive to small changes in these scattering properties.
  • domain assumption The Born-Oppenheimer approximation with a fixed perturber position R is valid, and many-body effects beyond a single perturber are negligible.
    Underlies the Hamiltonian in Eq. (3) and the potential-energy-curve picture; no multiple-perturber or thermal effects are included.
  • standard math The Wigner-Racah recoupling and Clebsch-Gordan algebra in the Appendix are correct.
    Derivation relies on standard angular momentum recoupling; it is not machine-checked.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ultralong-range Rydberg molecules of Hg atoms." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VUJXLDR4

@misc{pith2026241205025,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ultralong-range Rydberg molecules of Hg atoms},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VUJXLDR4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.05025}
}
read the original abstract

Ultralong-range Rydberg molecules, composed of an excited Rydberg atom and a ground-state atom, are characterized by large bond lengths, dipole moments, sensitivity to external fields, and an unusual binding mechanism based on low-energy elastic electron scattering. Although Rydberg molecules formed between alkali atoms have received the most attention, the additional complexity found in atoms with more than a single valence electron poses new theoretical challenges as well as new possibilities for control and design of the molecular structure. In this paper, we extend the theory of Rydberg molecules to include the additional spin coupling of the Rydberg states of a multivalent atom. We employ this theory to describe the properties of Rydberg molecules composed of mercury atoms. We calculate the potential energy curves of both heteronuclear (Hg*Rb) and homonuclear (Hg*Hg) molecules. In the former case, we propose the realization of long-range spin entanglement and remote spin flip. In the latter, we show how long-lived metastable molecular states of Hg*Hg exist as resonances above the dissociation threshold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.05025 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic drawing of the Hg*Rb Rydberg molecule. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Scattering phase shifts of an electron interacting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Potential energy curves of Hg*Rb molecules with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Potential energy curves of the Hg*Rb molecule with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Potential energy curves of the homonuclear Hg*Hg [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Diatomic and Polyatomic Heteronuclear Ultralong-Range Rydberg Molecules

    quant-ph 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper predicts the vibrational spectra and binding energies of heteronuclear Rb-Cs ultralong-range Rydberg molecules, including polyatomic versions, using the Fermi pseudopotential model.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [67]

    McEachran and M

    R. McEachran and M. Elford, The momentum trans- fer cross section and transport coefficients for low en- ergy electrons in mercury, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 36, 427 (2003)

    work page 2003

  2. [1]

    Oskay, S

    W. Oskay, S. A. Diddams, E. A. Donley, T. M. Fortier, T. P. Heavner, L. Hollberg, W. M. Itano, S. R. Jefferts, M. Delaney, K. Kim, et al., Single-atom optical clock with high accuracy, Physical Review Letters 97, 020801 (2006)

    2006

  3. [2]

    Hachisu, K

    H. Hachisu, K. Miyagishi, S. Porsev, A. Derevianko, V. Ovsiannikov, . f. V. Pal’chikov, M. Takamoto, and H. Katori, Trapping of neutral mercury atoms and prospects for optical lattice clocks, Physical Review Let- ters 100, 053001 (2008)

    2008

  4. [3]

    Gravina, C

    S. Gravina, C. Clivati, A. Castrillo, E. Fasci, N. Chishti, G. Galzerano, F. Levi, and L. Gianfrani, Measurement of the mercury (6s6p)3p1 - state lifetime in the frequency domain from integrated absorbance data, Physical Re- view Research 4, 033240 (2022)

    2022

  5. [4]

    Petersen, R

    M. Petersen, R. Chicireanu, S. T. Dawkins, D. V. Mag- alh˜ aes, C. Mandache, Y. Le Coq, A. Clairon, and S. Bize, Doppler-free spectroscopy of the 1s0-3p0 optical clock transition in laser-cooled fermionic isotopes of neutral mercury, Physical Review Letters 101, 183004 (2008)

    2008

  6. [5]

    J. D. Prestage, S. K. Chung, R. J. Thompson, and P. MacNeal, Progress on small mercury ion clock for space applications, in 2009 IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium Joint with the 22nd European Fre- quency and Time Forum(IEEE, 2009) pp. 54–57

    work page 2009

  7. [6]

    Gravina, N

    S. Gravina, N. A. Chishti, A. Castrillo, L. Gian- 8 frani, A. Sorgi, P. C. Pastor, C. Clivati, F. Bertiglia, G. Lopardo, F. Levi, et al., Comb-locked deep-ultraviolet laser system for precision mercury spectroscopy, Physical Review A 109, 022816 (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [7]

    Gravina, N

    S. Gravina, N. A. Chishti, S. Di Bernardo, E. Fasci, A. Castrillo, A. Laliotis, and L. Gianfrani, Comb- referenced doppler-free spectrometry of the 200hg and 202hg intercombination line at 254 nm, Physical Review Letters 132, 213001 (2024)

    work page 2024

Show all 84 references
  1. [8]

    Lavigne, T

    Q. Lavigne, T. Groh, and S. Stellmer, Magneto-optical trapping of mercury at high phase-space density, Physical Review A 105, 033106 (2022)

    2022

  2. [9]

    C. Guo, V. Cambier, J. Calvert, M. Favier, M. Andia, L. de Sarlo, and S. Bize, Exploiting the two-dimensional magneto-optical trapping of 199hg for a mercury optical lattice clock, Physical Review A 107, 033116 (2023)

    2023

  3. [10]

    McFerran, L

    J. McFerran, L. Yi, S. Mejri, and S. Bize, Sub-doppler cooling of fermionic hg isotopes in a magneto-optical trap, Optics letters 35, 3078 (2010)

    2010

  4. [11]

    Villwock, S

    P. Villwock, S. Siol, and T. Walther, Magneto-optical trapping of neutral mercury, The European Physical Journal D 65, 251 (2011)

    2011

  5. [12]

    Witkowski, B

    M. Witkowski, B. Nag´ orny, R. Munoz-Rodriguez, R. Ciury lo, P. S. ˙Zuchowski, S. Bilicki, M. Piotrowski, P. Morzy´ nski, and M. Zawada, Dual hg-rb magneto- optical trap, Optics Express 25, 3165 (2017)

    2017

  6. [13]

    Witkowski, R

    M. Witkowski, R. Munoz-Rodriguez, A. Raczy´ nski, J. Zaremba, B. Nag´ orny, P.˙Zuchowski, R. Ciury lo, and M. Zawada, Photoionization cross sections of the 5s1/2 and 5p3/2 states of rb in simultaneous magneto-optical trapping of rb and hg, Physical Review A 98, 053444 (2018)

    2018

  7. [14]

    V. S. Prasannaa, A. C. Vutha, M. Abe, and B. P. Das, Mercury monohalides: Suitability for electron electric dipole moment searches, Physical Review Letters 114, 183001 (2015)

    2015

  8. [15]

    Borkowski, R

    M. Borkowski, R. Mu˜ noz Rodriguez, M. B. Kosicki, R. Ciury lo, and P. S. ˙Zuchowski, Optical feshbach reso- nances and ground-state-molecule production in the rbhg system, Physical Review A 96, 063411 (2017)

    2017

  9. [16]

    Sunaga, M

    A. Sunaga, M. Abe, V. Prasannaa, T. Aoki, and M. Hada, Relativistic coupled-cluster study of diatomic metal-alkali-metal molecules for electron electric dipole moment searches, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molec- ular and Optical Physics 53, 015102 (2019)

    2019

  10. [17]

    Sunaga, V

    A. Sunaga, V. S. Prasannaa, M. Abe, M. Hada, and B. P. Das, Ultracold mercury–alkali-metal molecules for electron-electric-dipole-moment searches, Physysical Re- view A 99, 040501 (2019)

    2019

  11. [18]

    B. K. Sahoo and B. P. Das, Relativistic normal coupled- cluster theory for accurate determination of electric dipole moments of atoms: First application to the 199Hg atom, Physical Review Letters 120, 203001 (2018)

    2018

  12. [19]

    M. Zia, B. Suleman, and M. Baig, Two-photon laser op- togalvanic spectroscopy of the rydberg states of mercury by rf discharge, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 36, 4631 (2003)

    2003

  13. [20]

    Nadeem, M

    A. Nadeem, M. Nawaz, S. Haq, S. Shahzada, and M. Baig, Two-step laser excitation of the highly ex- cited even-parity states of atomic mercury, The European Physical Journal D 53, 147 (2009)

    2009

  14. [21]

    Zia and M

    M. Zia and M. Baig, Two-step laser optogalvanic spec- troscopy of the odd-parity rydberg states of atomic mer- cury, The European Physical Journal D-Atomic, Molec- ular, Optical and Plasma Physics 28, 323 (2004)

    2004

  15. [22]

    S. F. Dyubko, M. L. Pogrebnyak, and A. S. Kutsenko, Millimeter-wave spectroscopy of neutral mercury in ryd- berg f states, Spectroscopy Letters 54, 375 (2021)

    2021

  16. [23]

    Dalby and J

    F. Dalby and J. Sanders, Multi-photon absorption in mercury, Optics Communications 37, 261 (1981)

    1981

  17. [24]

    Clevenger, O

    W. Clevenger, O. Matveev, N. Omenetto, B. Smith, and J. Winefordner, Laser-enhanced ionization spectroscopy of mercury rydberg states, Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy 52, 1139 (1997)

    1997

  18. [25]

    Safronova, D

    M. Safronova, D. Budker, D. DeMille, D. F. J. Kimball, A. Derevianko, and C. W. Clark, Search for new physics with atoms and molecules, Reviews of Modern Physics 90, 025008 (2018)

    2018

  19. [26]

    Saffman, T

    M. Saffman, T. G. Walker, and K. Mølmer, Quantum information with rydberg atoms, Reviews of Modern Physics 82, 2313 (2010)

    2010

  20. [27]

    Morgado and S

    M. Morgado and S. Whitlock, Quantum simulation and computing with rydberg-interacting qubits, A VS Quan- tum Science 3 (2021)

    2021

  21. [28]

    S. R. Cohen and J. D. Thompson, Quantum computing with circular rydberg atoms, PRX Quantum 2, 030322 (2021)

    2021

  22. [29]

    Saffman, Quantum computing with atomic qubits and rydberg interactions: progress and challenges, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 49, 202001 (2016)

    M. Saffman, Quantum computing with atomic qubits and rydberg interactions: progress and challenges, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 49, 202001 (2016)

    2016

  23. [30]

    Weimer, M

    H. Weimer, M. M¨ uller, I. Lesanovsky, P. Zoller, and H. P. B¨ uchler, A rydberg quantum simulator, Nature Physics 6, 382 (2010)

    2010

  24. [31]

    Browaeys and T

    A. Browaeys and T. Lahaye, Many-body physics with in- dividually controlled rydberg atoms, Nature Physics 16, 132 (2020)

    2020

  25. [32]

    C. H. Greene, A. Dickinson, and H. Sadeghpour, Cre- ation of polar and nonpolar ultra-long-range rydberg molecules, Physical Review Letters 85, 2458 (2000)

    2000

  26. [33]

    Bendkowsky, B

    V. Bendkowsky, B. Butscher, J. Nipper, J. P. Shaffer, R. L¨ ow, and T. Pfau, Observation of ultralong-range ryd- berg molecules, Nature 458, 1005 (2009)

    2009

  27. [34]

    E. L. Hamilton, C. H. Greene, and H. Sadeghpour, Shape-resonance-induced long-range molecular rydberg states, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Op- tical Physics 35, L199 (2002)

    2002

  28. [35]

    Giannakeas, M

    P. Giannakeas, M. T. Eiles, F. Robicheaux, and J. M. Rost, Dressed ion-pair states of an ultralong-range ryd- berg molecule, Physical Review Letters 125, 123401 (2020)

    2020

  29. [36]

    M. T. Eiles and C. H. Greene, Hamiltonian for the in- clusion of spin effects in long-range rydberg molecules, Physical Review A 95, 042515 (2017)

    2017

  30. [37]

    C. H. Greene and M. T. Eiles, Green’s-function treatment of rydberg molecules with spins, Physical Review A 108, 042805 (2023)

    2023

  31. [38]

    B¨ ottcher, A

    F. B¨ ottcher, A. Gaj, K. M. Westphal, M. Schlagm¨ uller, K. S. Kleinbach, R. L¨ ow, T. C. Liebisch, T. Pfau, and S. Hofferberth, Observation of mixed singlet-triplet rb 2 rydberg molecules, Physical Review A 93, 032512 (2016)

    2016

  32. [39]

    A. T. Krupp, A. Gaj, J. B. Balewski, P. Ilzh¨ ofer, S. Hof- ferberth, R. L¨ ow, T. Pfau, M. Kurz, and P. Schmelcher, Alignment of d-state rydberg molecules, Physical review letters 112, 143008 (2014)

    2014

  33. [40]

    A. Gaj, A. T. Krupp, P. Ilzh¨ ofer, R. L¨ ow, S. Hoffer- berth, and T. Pfau, Hybridization of rydberg electron 9 orbitals by molecule formation, Physical review letters 115, 023001 (2015)

    2015

  34. [41]

    Hummel, C

    F. Hummel, C. Fey, and P. Schmelcher, Spin-interaction effects for ultralong-range rydberg molecules in a mag- netic field, Physical Review A 97, 043422 (2018)

    2018

  35. [42]

    Hummel, C

    F. Hummel, C. Fey, and P. Schmelcher, Alignment of s- state rydberg molecules in magnetic fields, Physical Re- view A 99, 023401 (2019)

    2019

  36. [43]

    Bendkowsky, B

    V. Bendkowsky, B. Butscher, J. Nipper, J. Balewski, J. Shaffer, R. L¨ ow, T. Pfau, W. Li, J. Stanojevic, T. Pohl, et al., Rydberg trimers and excited dimers bound by in- ternal quantum reflection, Physical Review Letters 105, 163201 (2010)

    2010

  37. [44]

    M. T. Eiles, J. P´ erez-R ´ ıos, F. Robicheaux, and C. H. Greene, Ultracold molecular rydberg physics in a high density environment, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 49, 114005 (2016)

    2016

  38. [45]

    C. Fey, M. Kurz, and P. Schmelcher, Stretching and bending dynamics in triatomic ultralong-range rydberg molecules, Physical Review A 94, 012516 (2016)

    2016

  39. [46]

    Kanungo, Y

    S. Kanungo, Y. Lu, F. B. Dunning, S. Yoshida, J. Burgd¨ orfer, and T. Killian, Measuring nonlocal three- body spatial correlations with rydberg trimers in ultra- cold quantum gases, Physical Review A 107, 033322 (2023)

    2023

  40. [47]

    Camargo, R

    F. Camargo, R. Schmidt, J. Whalen, R. Ding, G. Woehl Jr, S. Yoshida, J. Burgd¨ orfer, F. Dunning, H. Sadeghpour, E. Demler, et al., Creation of rydberg po- larons in a bose gas, Physical Review Letters120, 083401 (2018)

    2018

  41. [48]

    A. A. Durst and M. T. Eiles, Phenomenology of a rydberg impurity in an ideal bose-einstein condensate, Physical Review Research 6, L042009 (2024)

    2024

  42. [49]

    J. Sous, H. Sadeghpour, T. Killian, E. Demler, and R. Schmidt, Rydberg impurity in a fermi gas: Quan- tum statistics and rotational blockade, Physical Review Research 2, 023021 (2020)

    2020

  43. [50]

    S. T. Rittenhouse and H. Sadeghpour, Ultracold giant polyatomic rydberg molecules: coherent control of molec- ular orientation, Physical review letters 104, 243002 (2010)

    2010

  44. [51]

    Gonz´ alez-F´ erez, J

    R. Gonz´ alez-F´ erez, J. Shertzer, and H. Sadeghpour, Ultralong-range rydberg bimolecules, Physical Review Letters 126, 043401 (2021)

    2021

  45. [52]

    Guttridge, D

    A. Guttridge, D. K. Ruttley, A. C. Baldock, R. Gonz´ alez- F´ erez, H. Sadeghpour, C. Adams, and S. L. Cornish, Ob- servation of rydberg blockade due to the charge-dipole in- teraction between an atom and a polar molecule, Physical Review Letters 131, 013401 (2023)

    2023

  46. [53]

    B. J. DeSalvo, J. Aman, F. Dunning, T. Killian, H. Sadeghpour, S. Yoshida, and J. Burgd¨ orfer, Ultra- long-range rydberg molecules in a divalent atomic sys- tem, Physical Review A 92, 031403 (2015)

    2015

  47. [54]

    Camargo, J

    F. Camargo, J. Whalen, R. Ding, H. Sadeghpour, S. Yoshida, J. Burgd¨ orfer, F. Dunning, and T. Kil- lian, Lifetimes of ultra-long-range strontium rydberg molecules, Physical Review A 93, 022702 (2016)

    2016

  48. [55]

    Whalen, S

    J. Whalen, S. Kanungo, Y. Lu, S. Yoshida, J. Burgd¨ orfer, F. Dunning, and T. Killian, Heteronuclear rydberg molecules, Physical Review A 101, 060701 (2020)

    2020

  49. [56]

    Y. Lu, J. Whalen, S. Kanungo, T. Killian, F. Dunning, S. Yoshida, and J. Burgd¨ orfer, Resolving rotationally ex- cited states of ultralong-range rydberg molecules, Physi- cal Review A 106, 022809 (2022)

    2022

  50. [57]

    M. T. Eiles and C. H. Greene, Ultracold long-range ryd- berg molecules with complex multichannel spectra, Phys- ical Review Letters 115, 193201 (2015)

    2015

  51. [58]

    Vaillant, M

    C. Vaillant, M. Jones, and R. Potvliege, Long-range rydberg–rydberg interactions in calcium, strontium and ytterbium, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 45, 135004 (2012)

    2012

  52. [59]

    Peper, Y

    M. Peper, Y. Li, D. Y. Knapp, M. Bileska, S. Ma, G. Liu, P. Peng, B. Zhang, S. P. Horvath, A. P. Burg- ers, et al., Spectroscopy and modeling of 171yb rydberg states for high-fidelity two-qubit gates, arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.01482 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  53. [60]

    Wilson, S

    J. Wilson, S. Saskin, Y. Meng, S. Ma, R. Dilip, A. Burg- ers, and J. Thompson, Trapping alkaline earth rydberg atoms optical tweezer arrays, Physical Review Letters 128, 033201 (2022)

    2022

  54. [61]

    N. Chen, L. Li, W. Huie, M. Zhao, I. Vetter, C. H. Greene, and J. P. Covey, Analyzing the rydberg-based optical-metastable-ground architecture for 171yb nuclear spins, Physical Review A 105, 052438 (2022)

    2022

  55. [62]

    Nakamura, T

    Y. Nakamura, T. Kusano, R. Yokoyama, K. Saito, K. Hi- gashi, N. Ozawa, T. Takano, Y. Takasu, and Y. Taka- hashi, A hybrid atom tweezer array of nuclear spin and optical clock qubits, arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.12247 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  56. [63]

    Trautmann, M

    A. Trautmann, M. Mark, P. Ilzh¨ ofer, H. Edri, A. El Ar- rach, J. Maloberti, C. Greene, F. Robicheaux, and F. Fer- laino, Spectroscopy of rydberg states in erbium using electromagnetically induced transparency, Physical Re- view Research 3, 033165 (2021)

    2021

  57. [64]

    Hostetter, J

    J. Hostetter, J. Pritchard, J. Lawler, and M. Saffman, Measurement of holmium rydberg series through magneto-optical trap depletion spectroscopy, Physical Review A 91, 012507 (2015)

    2015

  58. [65]

    Aymar, C

    M. Aymar, C. H. Greene, and E. Luc-Koenig, Multichan- nel rydberg spectroscopy of complex atoms, Reviews of Modern Physics 68, 1015 (1996)

    1996

  59. [66]

    Engel, T

    F. Engel, T. Dieterle, F. Hummel, C. Fey, P. Schmelcher, R. L¨ ow, T. Pfau, and F. Meinert, Precision spectroscopy of negative-ion resonances in ultralong-range rydberg molecules, Physical Review Letters 123, 073003 (2019)

    2019

  60. [68]

    Baig, High resolution measurement and mqdt analy- sis of the 5 d96s2np, nf (j = 1) autoionizing resonances of mercury, The European Physical Journal D 46, 437 (2008)

    M. Baig, High resolution measurement and mqdt analy- sis of the 5 d96s2np, nf (j = 1) autoionizing resonances of mercury, The European Physical Journal D 46, 437 (2008)

    2008

  61. [69]

    M. A. Baig, High rydberg transitions in the principal and intercombination series of mercury, Journal of Physics B: Atomic and Molecular Physics 16, 1511 (1983)

    1983

  62. [70]

    Fermi, Sopra lo spostamento per pressione delle righe elevate delle serie spettrali, Il Nuovo Cimento (1924-

    E. Fermi, Sopra lo spostamento per pressione delle righe elevate delle serie spettrali, Il Nuovo Cimento (1924-

    1924

  63. [71]

    Omont, On the theory of collisions of atoms in rydberg states with neutral particles, Journal de Physique 38, 1343 (1977)

    A. Omont, On the theory of collisions of atoms in rydberg states with neutral particles, Journal de Physique 38, 1343 (1977)

    1977

  64. [72]

    Khuskivadze, M

    A. Khuskivadze, M. Chibisov, and I. Fabrikant, Adia- batic energy levels and electric dipole moments of ryd- berg states of rb 2 and cs2 dimers, Physical Review A 66, 042709 (2002)

    2002

  65. [73]

    Booth, S

    D. Booth, S. Rittenhouse, J. Yang, H. Sadeghpour, and J. Shaffer, Production of trilobite rydberg molecule 10 dimers with kilo-debye permanent electric dipole mo- ments, Science 348, 99 (2015)

    2015

  66. [74]

    Alth¨ on, M

    M. Alth¨ on, M. Exner, R. Bl¨ attner, and H. Ott, Exploring the vibrational series of pure trilobite rydberg molecules, Nature Communications 14, 8108 (2023)

    2023

  67. [75]

    Niederpr¨ um, O

    T. Niederpr¨ um, O. Thomas, T. Eichert, C. Lippe, J. P´ erez-R ´ ıos, C. H. Greene, and H. Ott, Observation of pendular butterfly rydberg molecules, Nature commu- nications 7, 1 (2016)

    2016

  68. [76]

    Niederpr¨ um, O

    T. Niederpr¨ um, O. Thomas, T. Eichert, and H. Ott, Ryd- berg molecule-induced remote spin flips, Physical Review Letters 117, 123002 (2016)

    2016

  69. [77]

    Mandelshtam, T

    V. Mandelshtam, T. Ravuri, and H. Taylor, Calculation of the density of resonance states using the stabilization method, Physical Review Letters 70, 1932 (1993)

    1993

  70. [78]

    I. C. Liu, J. Stanojevic, and J. M. Rost, Ultra-long-range rydberg trimers with a repulsive two-body interaction, Physical Review Letters 102, 173001 (2009)

    2009

  71. [79]

    Aubry and G

    S. Aubry and G. Andr´ e, Analyticity breaking and ander- son localization in incommensurate lattices, Ann. Israel Phys. Soc 3, 18 (1980)

    1980

  72. [80]

    P. W. Anderson, Absence of diffusion in certain random lattices, Physical review 109, 1492 (1958)

    1958

  73. [81]

    F. H. Stillinger and D. R. Herrick, Bound states in the continuum, Physical Review A 11, 446 (1975)

    1975

  74. [82]

    Fano and G

    U. Fano and G. Racah, Irreducible tensorial sets, Irre- ducible tensorial sets (1959)

    1959

  75. [83]

    Fano and J

    U. Fano and J. H. Macek, Impact excitation and polar- ization of the emitted light, Reviews of Modern Physics 45, 553 (1973)

    1973

  76. [84]

    C. H. Greene and R. N. Zare, Photofragment alignment and orientation, Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 33, 119 (1982). 11 Appendix: Derivation of the Hamiltonian The derivation of the Hamiltonian works both on the tensorial form of the pseudopotential and the Rydberg wavefu...

    1982

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.