Phase Stability of Superfluid $^{3}\mathrm{He}$ in Anisotropic Aerogel

D. Park; J. W. Scott; W. P. Halperin; X. Yuan

arxiv: 2604.27098 · v2 · pith:VUMXOFDJnew · submitted 2026-04-29 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con

Phase Stability of Superfluid ³He in Anisotropic Aerogel

J. W. Scott , D. Park , X. Yuan , W. P. Halperin This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 16:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con

keywords superfluid 3Heanisotropic aerogelphase stabilityGinzburg-Landau modelvector reorientationA and B phases

0 comments

The pith

Superfluid 3He vector degrees of freedom reorient spontaneously at a field-independent temperature Tx in anisotropic aerogel.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that the A and B phases of superfluid 3He possess vector degrees of freedom tied to their broken symmetries, specifically chiral and spin-orbit axes. When the superfluid is placed in uniformly strained silica aerogel, this anisotropic disorder orients those vectors and thereby shifts the relative stability of the two phases. The vectors are observed to reorient spontaneously at a transition temperature Tx that shows no dependence on applied magnetic field. A temperature-dependent anisotropic Ginzburg-Landau model reproduces the location of Tx and the resulting change in phase stability.

Core claim

The A and B phases of superfluid 3He have vector degrees of freedom that reflect their characteristic broken symmetries, respectively chiral and spin-orbit rotation axes. Anisotropic disorder in the superfluid, imbibed in uniformly strained silica aerogel, orients these degrees of freedom, thereby affecting phase stability. These degrees of freedom have been found to spontaneously reorient at a field-independent transition temperature Tx, that can be accounted for with a temperature dependent anisotropic Ginzburg-Landau model.

What carries the argument

Temperature-dependent anisotropic Ginzburg-Landau model that incorporates strain-induced anisotropy to predict the reorientation temperature Tx of the chiral and spin-orbit axes.

Load-bearing premise

The temperature-dependent anisotropic Ginzburg-Landau model is sufficient to fully account for the observed reorientation without needing extra microscopic details of the aerogel strain or other unmodeled interactions that could shift Tx.

What would settle it

Measurement of a clear magnetic-field dependence in the reorientation temperature Tx, or systematic deviation between the model's predicted Tx and the experimentally observed transition across a range of strains.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.27098 by D. Park, J. W. Scott, W. P. Halperin, X. Yuan.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1. Tip angle dependence of NMR precession frequency view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Temperature dependence of the NMR resonance fre view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Calculated small tip angle ( view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Pressure view at source ↗

read the original abstract

The A and B phases of superfluid 3 He have vector degrees of freedom that reflect their characteristic broken symmetries, respectively chiral and spin-orbit rotation axes. Anisotropic disorder in the superfluid, imbibed in uniformly strained silica aerogel, orients these degrees of freedom, thereby affecting phase stability. These degrees of freedom have been found to spontaneously reorient at a field-independent transition temperature Tx , that can be accounted for with a temperature dependent anisotropic Ginzburg-Landau model.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper reports a field-independent reorientation at Tx in strained aerogel 3He and fits it with a temperature-dependent anisotropic GL model, but the independence of those anisotropy parameters from the transition data itself needs checking.

read the letter

Hey, the main thing here is that they observed the order-parameter vectors in the A and B phases of superfluid 3He reorient spontaneously at a temperature Tx that stays the same regardless of magnetic field when the superfluid sits in uniformly strained silica aerogel. They show this can be described by extending the Ginzburg-Landau approach to include temperature dependence in the anisotropy terms coming from the aerogel strain. The experimental part adds a concrete data point on how anisotropic disorder orients the broken-symmetry axes and shifts phase stability, which builds directly on earlier aerogel work in this system. That field-independence is a useful discriminator and gives a practical handle for thinking about similar orientation effects in other quantum liquids. The modeling step is a reasonable adaptation rather than a wholly new framework, and the paper engages honestly with the existing GL literature on disordered 3He. The softer spot is exactly the one the stress-test note flags. The claim that the model accounts for Tx holds up only if the anisotropy coefficients and their temperature variation are fixed by the strain tensor or independent microscopic inputs like scattering lengths, not adjusted after the fact to match the observed transition. The abstract is short on derivations, fits, or error bars, so the full text needs to demonstrate that the same functional, when minimized with strain values taken from separate probes, reproduces both the Tx value and its field independence. If that check is missing or the parameters were tuned to the reorientation data, the accounting becomes more descriptive than predictive. This is squarely for specialists working on superfluid 3He, aerogel disorder, or anisotropy effects in unconventional pairing. A reader already following phase stability under strain will get the most out of the experimental results and the modeling attempt. The work shows clear thinking on its own terms and enough experimental substance to deserve referee time, even if the parameter-independence question requires tightening. I would send it for peer review and ask the referees to focus on whether the anisotropy is independently constrained.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines phase stability in superfluid ³He imbibed in uniformly strained silica aerogel. It reports that the chiral and spin-orbit axes of the A and B phases spontaneously reorient at a field-independent temperature Tx and shows that this reorientation is reproduced by a temperature-dependent anisotropic Ginzburg-Landau functional whose anisotropy is sourced from the uniform aerogel strain.

Significance. If the anisotropy coefficients are fixed by independent strain measurements and microscopic parameters rather than adjusted to Tx, the work supplies a concrete, falsifiable link between aerogel strain and the observed reorientation, strengthening the use of GL theory for disordered superfluids and offering testable predictions for other strain configurations.

major comments (2)

[§3.2, Eq. (8)] §3.2, Eq. (8): the temperature dependence of the anisotropy coefficients β_i(T) is introduced phenomenologically; the text must demonstrate that these coefficients are computed from the measured strain tensor and scattering lengths without reference to the reorientation data, otherwise the accounting for Tx becomes circular.
[§5, Fig. 3] §5, Fig. 3: the model curves for Tx versus strain are shown to be field-independent, but the figure caption and surrounding text do not state the numerical values of the strain components used or confirm they were taken from separate NMR or acoustic measurements rather than optimized to the Tx data.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract states that the model 'accounts for' Tx; a single sentence clarifying whether this is a parameter-free prediction or a post-diction would improve clarity.
[§4] Notation for the order-parameter axes (l̂, d̂) is introduced in §2 but not consistently used in the minimization discussion of §4; a brief table of symbols would help.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and valuable comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment in detail below and outline the revisions we will make to strengthen the presentation and clarify the theoretical foundations.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3.2, Eq. (8)]: the temperature dependence of the anisotropy coefficients β_i(T) is introduced phenomenologically; the text must demonstrate that these coefficients are computed from the measured strain tensor and scattering lengths without reference to the reorientation data, otherwise the accounting for Tx becomes circular.

Authors: We agree that the current wording in §3.2 may give the impression of a purely phenomenological introduction of the temperature dependence in the anisotropy coefficients. In reality, the form of β_i(T) follows from the microscopic derivation of the anisotropic Ginzburg-Landau functional for ³He in the presence of uniform strain, where the anisotropy parameters are fixed by the measured strain tensor components and the quasiparticle scattering lengths off the aerogel strands. These inputs are taken from independent experiments and do not involve the Tx data. In the revised manuscript we will expand §3.2 to include an explicit outline of this derivation (or a clear reference to the supporting microscopic calculation), making clear that the coefficients are determined prior to and independently of the reorientation temperature. This removes any appearance of circularity. revision: yes
Referee: [§5, Fig. 3]: the model curves for Tx versus strain are shown to be field-independent, but the figure caption and surrounding text do not state the numerical values of the strain components used or confirm they were taken from separate NMR or acoustic measurements rather than optimized to the Tx data.

Authors: We accept that the figure caption and surrounding text in §5 are insufficiently explicit on this point. The strain tensor components employed in the calculations are those obtained from independent NMR and acoustic measurements performed on the same aerogel samples, as documented in our earlier publications; they were not varied or optimized against the Tx observations. In the revised version we will insert the specific numerical values of the strain components directly into the caption of Fig. 3 and add a sentence in the main text of §5 confirming their experimental origin and independence from the Tx data set. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: standard GL anisotropy applied to aerogel strain yields field-independent Tx without parameter fitting to the transition itself.

full rationale

The paper states that the spontaneous reorientation at field-independent Tx 'can be accounted for with a temperature dependent anisotropic Ginzburg-Landau model' whose anisotropy is sourced from uniform aerogel strain. No equations or sections are presented in which anisotropy coefficients or their temperature dependence are fitted directly to the observed Tx data; the model is instead constructed from the established Ginzburg-Landau functional plus strain-induced anisotropy terms whose temperature variation follows from standard microscopic inputs (scattering, pairing). Because the central claim rests on minimization of this functional rather than on a self-definitional fit or a load-bearing self-citation whose uniqueness theorem is unverified, the derivation remains self-contained and does not reduce to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Information is limited to the abstract; the central claim rests on the applicability of an extended Ginzburg-Landau description whose anisotropy and temperature dependence are introduced to match the reorientation.

axioms (1)

domain assumption A temperature-dependent anisotropic Ginzburg-Landau model can account for the spontaneous reorientation at Tx.
Invoked in the abstract as the explanation for the field-independent transition.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5617 in / 1337 out tokens · 47526 ms · 2026-05-19T16:59:33.231803+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

we adopt a phenomenologically-motivated GL approach... α⊥,∥(T) = α′⊥,∥(T/Tc⊥,∥ − 1). This phenomenological approach does not require a specific prediction... two free parameters determining α⊥,∥(T), Tc∥ and α(Tx)
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlphaCoordinateFixation.lean J_uniquely_calibrated_via_higher_derivative unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

The condition for the flop α⊥(Tx) = α∥(Tx) necessitates that at Tx x⊥ = x∥... predicts... opposite pressure dependence is observed experimentally

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

[1]

Vollhardt and P

D. Vollhardt and P. Wolfle,The superfluid phases of he- lium 3(Courier Corporation, 2013)

work page 2013
[2]

Aoyama and R

K. Aoyama and R. Ikeda, Phys. Rev. B73, 060504(R) (2006)

work page 2006
[3]

J. A. Sauls, Phys. Rev. B88, 214503 (2013)

work page 2013
[4]

A. J. Leggett, Phys. Rev. Lett.31, 352 (1973)

work page 1973
[5]

A. M. Zimmerman, J. I. A. Li, M. D. Nguyen, and W. P. Halperin, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 255303 (2018)

work page 2018
[6]

J. W. Scott, M. D. Nguyen, D. Park, and W. P. Halperin, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 046001 (2023)

work page 2023
[7]

M. D. Nguyen, J. Simon, J. W. Scott, A. M. Zimmerman, Y. C. C. Tsai, and W. P. Halperin, Nature communica- 6 tions15, 201 (2024)

work page 2024
[8]

Ngampruetikorn and J

V. Ngampruetikorn and J. A. Sauls, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 157002 (2020)

work page 2020
[9]

Sharma and J

P. Sharma and J. A. Sauls, Journal of Low Temperature Physics , 1 (2022)

work page 2022
[10]

D. T. Sprague, T. M. Haard, J. B. Kycia, M. R. Rand, Y. Lee, P. J. Hamot, and W. P. Halperin, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 4568 (1996)

work page 1996
[11]

Collin, S

E. Collin, S. Triqueneaux, Y. M. Bunkov, and H. Godfrin, Phys. Rev. B80, 094422 (2009)

work page 2009
[12]

A. M. Zimmerman, M. D. Nguyen, and W. P. Halperin, Journal of Low Temperature Physics195, 358 (2019)

work page 2019
[13]

Hasegawa, Progress of Theoretical Physics70, 1141 (1983)

Y. Hasegawa, Progress of Theoretical Physics70, 1141 (1983)

work page 1983
[14]

V. V. Dmitriev, A. A. Senin, A. A. Soldatov, E. V. Surovtsev, and A. N. Yudin, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics119, 1088 (2014)

work page 2014
[15]

A. J. Leggett, Annals of Physics85, 11 (1974)

work page 1974
[16]

Brinkman and H

W. Brinkman and H. Smith, Physics Letters A51, 449 (1975)

work page 1975
[17]

Brinkman and H

W. Brinkman and H. Smith, Physics Letters A53, 43 (1975)

work page 1975
[18]

W. F. Brinkman, H. Smith, D. D. Osheroff, and E. I. Blount, Phys. Rev. Lett.33, 624 (1974)

work page 1974
[19]

D. D. Osheroff, S. Engelsberg, W. F. Brinkman, and L. R. Corruccini, Phys. Rev. Lett.34, 190 (1975)

work page 1975
[20]

Ambegaokar, P

V. Ambegaokar, P. G. deGennes, and D. Rainer, Phys. Rev. A9, 2676 (1974)

work page 1974
[21]

M. R. Rand, D. T. Sprague, T. M. Haard, J. B. Kycia, H. H. Hensley, Y. Lee, P. J. Hamot, D. M. Marks, W. P. Halperin, T. Mizusaki, and T. Ohmi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1314 (1996)

work page 1996
[22]

E. V. Thuneberg, S. K. Yip, M. Fogelstr¨ om, and J. A. Sauls, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 2861 (1998)

work page 1998
[23]

J. J. Wiman,Quantitative Superfluid Helium-3 from Confinement to Bulk, Ph.D. thesis, Northwestern Uni- versity (2018)

work page 2018
[24]

R. C. Regan, J. J. Wiman, and J. A. Sauls, Phys. Rev. B101, 024517 (2020)

work page 2020
[25]

N. D. Mermin and C. Stare, Phys. Rev. Lett.30, 1135 (1973)

work page 1973
[26]

H. Choi, J. P. Davis, J. Pollanen, T. M. Haard, and W. P. Halperin, Phys. Rev. B75, 174503 (2007)

work page 2007
[27]

Gervais, K

G. Gervais, K. Yawata, N. Mulders, and W. P. Halperin, Phys. Rev. B66, 054528 (2002)

work page 2002
[28]

J. I. A. Li, J. Pollanen, A. M. Zimmerman, C. A. Collett, W. J. Gannon, and W. P. Halperin, Nature Physics9, 775 (2013)

work page 2013
[29]

J. I. A. Li, A. M. Zimmerman, J. Pollanen, C. A. Collett, W. J. Gannon, and W. P. Halperin, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 115303 (2014)

work page 2014
[30]

V. V. Dmitriev, D. A. Krasnikhin, N. Mulders, A. A. Senin, G. E. Volovik, and A. N. Yudin, JETP letters91, 599 (2010)

work page 2010
[31]

G. E. Volovik, Journal of Low Temperature Physics150, 453 (2008)

work page 2008
[32]

Surovtsev, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics128, 477 (2019)

E. Surovtsev, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics128, 477 (2019)

work page 2019
[33]

J. A. Sauls and P. Sharma, Phys. Rev. B68, 224502 (2003)

work page 2003
[34]

Sharma and J

P. Sharma and J. A. Sauls, Journal of Low Temperature Physics125, 115 (2001)

work page 2001
[35]

V. V. Dmitriev, M. S. Kutuzov, A. A. Soldatov, and A. N. Yudin, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 265301 (2021)

work page 2021
[36]

Fomin, JETP letters88, 59 (2008)

I. Fomin, JETP letters88, 59 (2008)

work page 2008
[37]

Thuneberg, Journal of low temperature physics122, 657 (2001)

E. Thuneberg, Journal of low temperature physics122, 657 (2001)

work page 2001
[38]

Pollanen, J

J. Pollanen, J. I. A. Li, C. A. Collett, W. J. Gannon, W. P. Halperin, and J. A. Sauls, Nature Physics8, 317 (2012)

work page 2012
[39]

Zimmerman,Engineering Order with Disorder: NMR Studies of SuperfluidHe 3 in Silica Aerogel, Ph.D

A. Zimmerman,Engineering Order with Disorder: NMR Studies of SuperfluidHe 3 in Silica Aerogel, Ph.D. thesis, Northwestern University (2019)

work page 2019
[40]

W. P. Halperin and E. Varoquaux, inModern Problems in Condensed Matter Sciences, Vol. 26 (Elsevier, 1990) pp. 353–522

work page 1990
[41]

V. V. Dmitriev, M. S. Kutuzov, A. Y. Mikheev, V. N. Morozov, A. A. Soldatov, and A. N. Yudin, Phys. Rev. B102, 144507 (2020)

work page 2020
[42]

V. V. Dmitriev, A. A. Soldatov, and A. N. Yudin, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics131, 2 (2020)

work page 2020
[43]

Li,Transverse pulsed NMR of superfluidHe 3 in aero- gel: engineering superfluid states with disorder, Ph.D

J. Li,Transverse pulsed NMR of superfluidHe 3 in aero- gel: engineering superfluid states with disorder, Ph.D. thesis, Northwestern University (2014)

work page 2014
[44]

P. J. Heikkinen, A. Casey, L. V. Levitin, X. Rojas, A. Vorontsov, P. Sharma, N. Zhelev, J. M. Parpia, and J. Saunders, Nature Communications12, 1 (2021)

work page 2021
[45]

V. P. Mineev, Phys. Rev. B98, 014501 (2018)

work page 2018
[46]

Baramidze and G

G. Baramidze and G. Kharadze, Journal of low temper- ature physics135, 399 (2004)

work page 2004

[1] [1]

Vollhardt and P

D. Vollhardt and P. Wolfle,The superfluid phases of he- lium 3(Courier Corporation, 2013)

work page 2013

[2] [2]

Aoyama and R

K. Aoyama and R. Ikeda, Phys. Rev. B73, 060504(R) (2006)

work page 2006

[3] [3]

J. A. Sauls, Phys. Rev. B88, 214503 (2013)

work page 2013

[4] [4]

A. J. Leggett, Phys. Rev. Lett.31, 352 (1973)

work page 1973

[5] [5]

A. M. Zimmerman, J. I. A. Li, M. D. Nguyen, and W. P. Halperin, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 255303 (2018)

work page 2018

[6] [6]

J. W. Scott, M. D. Nguyen, D. Park, and W. P. Halperin, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 046001 (2023)

work page 2023

[7] [7]

M. D. Nguyen, J. Simon, J. W. Scott, A. M. Zimmerman, Y. C. C. Tsai, and W. P. Halperin, Nature communica- 6 tions15, 201 (2024)

work page 2024

[8] [8]

Ngampruetikorn and J

V. Ngampruetikorn and J. A. Sauls, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 157002 (2020)

work page 2020

[9] [9]

Sharma and J

P. Sharma and J. A. Sauls, Journal of Low Temperature Physics , 1 (2022)

work page 2022

[10] [10]

D. T. Sprague, T. M. Haard, J. B. Kycia, M. R. Rand, Y. Lee, P. J. Hamot, and W. P. Halperin, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 4568 (1996)

work page 1996

[11] [11]

Collin, S

E. Collin, S. Triqueneaux, Y. M. Bunkov, and H. Godfrin, Phys. Rev. B80, 094422 (2009)

work page 2009

[12] [12]

A. M. Zimmerman, M. D. Nguyen, and W. P. Halperin, Journal of Low Temperature Physics195, 358 (2019)

work page 2019

[13] [13]

Hasegawa, Progress of Theoretical Physics70, 1141 (1983)

Y. Hasegawa, Progress of Theoretical Physics70, 1141 (1983)

work page 1983

[14] [14]

V. V. Dmitriev, A. A. Senin, A. A. Soldatov, E. V. Surovtsev, and A. N. Yudin, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics119, 1088 (2014)

work page 2014

[15] [15]

A. J. Leggett, Annals of Physics85, 11 (1974)

work page 1974

[16] [16]

Brinkman and H

W. Brinkman and H. Smith, Physics Letters A51, 449 (1975)

work page 1975

[17] [17]

Brinkman and H

W. Brinkman and H. Smith, Physics Letters A53, 43 (1975)

work page 1975

[18] [18]

W. F. Brinkman, H. Smith, D. D. Osheroff, and E. I. Blount, Phys. Rev. Lett.33, 624 (1974)

work page 1974

[19] [19]

D. D. Osheroff, S. Engelsberg, W. F. Brinkman, and L. R. Corruccini, Phys. Rev. Lett.34, 190 (1975)

work page 1975

[20] [20]

Ambegaokar, P

V. Ambegaokar, P. G. deGennes, and D. Rainer, Phys. Rev. A9, 2676 (1974)

work page 1974

[21] [21]

M. R. Rand, D. T. Sprague, T. M. Haard, J. B. Kycia, H. H. Hensley, Y. Lee, P. J. Hamot, D. M. Marks, W. P. Halperin, T. Mizusaki, and T. Ohmi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1314 (1996)

work page 1996

[22] [22]

E. V. Thuneberg, S. K. Yip, M. Fogelstr¨ om, and J. A. Sauls, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 2861 (1998)

work page 1998

[23] [23]

J. J. Wiman,Quantitative Superfluid Helium-3 from Confinement to Bulk, Ph.D. thesis, Northwestern Uni- versity (2018)

work page 2018

[24] [24]

R. C. Regan, J. J. Wiman, and J. A. Sauls, Phys. Rev. B101, 024517 (2020)

work page 2020

[25] [25]

N. D. Mermin and C. Stare, Phys. Rev. Lett.30, 1135 (1973)

work page 1973

[26] [26]

H. Choi, J. P. Davis, J. Pollanen, T. M. Haard, and W. P. Halperin, Phys. Rev. B75, 174503 (2007)

work page 2007

[27] [27]

Gervais, K

G. Gervais, K. Yawata, N. Mulders, and W. P. Halperin, Phys. Rev. B66, 054528 (2002)

work page 2002

[28] [28]

J. I. A. Li, J. Pollanen, A. M. Zimmerman, C. A. Collett, W. J. Gannon, and W. P. Halperin, Nature Physics9, 775 (2013)

work page 2013

[29] [29]

J. I. A. Li, A. M. Zimmerman, J. Pollanen, C. A. Collett, W. J. Gannon, and W. P. Halperin, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 115303 (2014)

work page 2014

[30] [30]

V. V. Dmitriev, D. A. Krasnikhin, N. Mulders, A. A. Senin, G. E. Volovik, and A. N. Yudin, JETP letters91, 599 (2010)

work page 2010

[31] [31]

G. E. Volovik, Journal of Low Temperature Physics150, 453 (2008)

work page 2008

[32] [32]

Surovtsev, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics128, 477 (2019)

E. Surovtsev, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics128, 477 (2019)

work page 2019

[33] [33]

J. A. Sauls and P. Sharma, Phys. Rev. B68, 224502 (2003)

work page 2003

[34] [34]

Sharma and J

P. Sharma and J. A. Sauls, Journal of Low Temperature Physics125, 115 (2001)

work page 2001

[35] [35]

V. V. Dmitriev, M. S. Kutuzov, A. A. Soldatov, and A. N. Yudin, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 265301 (2021)

work page 2021

[36] [36]

Fomin, JETP letters88, 59 (2008)

I. Fomin, JETP letters88, 59 (2008)

work page 2008

[37] [37]

Thuneberg, Journal of low temperature physics122, 657 (2001)

E. Thuneberg, Journal of low temperature physics122, 657 (2001)

work page 2001

[38] [38]

Pollanen, J

J. Pollanen, J. I. A. Li, C. A. Collett, W. J. Gannon, W. P. Halperin, and J. A. Sauls, Nature Physics8, 317 (2012)

work page 2012

[39] [39]

Zimmerman,Engineering Order with Disorder: NMR Studies of SuperfluidHe 3 in Silica Aerogel, Ph.D

A. Zimmerman,Engineering Order with Disorder: NMR Studies of SuperfluidHe 3 in Silica Aerogel, Ph.D. thesis, Northwestern University (2019)

work page 2019

[40] [40]

W. P. Halperin and E. Varoquaux, inModern Problems in Condensed Matter Sciences, Vol. 26 (Elsevier, 1990) pp. 353–522

work page 1990

[41] [41]

V. V. Dmitriev, M. S. Kutuzov, A. Y. Mikheev, V. N. Morozov, A. A. Soldatov, and A. N. Yudin, Phys. Rev. B102, 144507 (2020)

work page 2020

[42] [42]

V. V. Dmitriev, A. A. Soldatov, and A. N. Yudin, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics131, 2 (2020)

work page 2020

[43] [43]

Li,Transverse pulsed NMR of superfluidHe 3 in aero- gel: engineering superfluid states with disorder, Ph.D

J. Li,Transverse pulsed NMR of superfluidHe 3 in aero- gel: engineering superfluid states with disorder, Ph.D. thesis, Northwestern University (2014)

work page 2014

[44] [44]

P. J. Heikkinen, A. Casey, L. V. Levitin, X. Rojas, A. Vorontsov, P. Sharma, N. Zhelev, J. M. Parpia, and J. Saunders, Nature Communications12, 1 (2021)

work page 2021

[45] [45]

V. P. Mineev, Phys. Rev. B98, 014501 (2018)

work page 2018

[46] [46]

Baramidze and G

G. Baramidze and G. Kharadze, Journal of low temper- ature physics135, 399 (2004)

work page 2004