Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 38 references

Exploring the circumstellar environment of Tycho's supernova remnant. II. Impact on the broadband non-thermal emission

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Tycho's supernova remnant likely exploded inside a wind-blown cavity ringed by a dense molecular cloud, but that environment predicts a harder gamma-ray spectrum than observed.

desk verdict An honest application of the wind-cavity model to Tycho's SED, with a real gamma-ray tension that deserves attention – but the density profile's CR-feedback degeneracy needs addressing. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.07130 v1 pith:VUPOXKYU submitted 2024-12-10 astro-ph.HE hep-ph

Ryosuke Kobashi , Shiu-Hang Lee , Takaaki Tanaka , Keiichi Maeda This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HEhep-ph
keywords TypeIasupernovaeSupernovaremnantsX-raysourcesCircumstellarmatterMolecularcloudsNon-thermalradiationgamma-rayspectracosmic-rayacceleration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Tycho's supernova remnant has long been modeled as expanding into a nearly uniform interstellar medium, but recent proper-motion measurements reveal a substantial deceleration of its forward shock, pointing to a rarefied, wind-like cavity surrounded by a dense molecular cloud. This paper tests whether that wind-plus-cloud environment can also account for the remnant's observed radio, X-ray, and gamma-ray emission. The simulated broadband spectrum matches the radio-to-GeV observations, but the model produces a harder gamma-ray spectrum than the data because the shock is still inside the low-density cavity, where inverse-Compton emission from electrons dominates over pion-decay emission from proton-proton collisions. The authors argue that this shortcoming likely reflects the one-dimensional, smooth density structure of the model, and they predict rapid spectral evolution over the next few decades as the shock begins to interact with the dense shell, which future observations can test.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the wind-MC density profile: an inner cavity where $\rho(r)\propto r^{-2}$ (a wind-blown bubble) surrounded by a dense molecular-cloud shell, with the profile taken from the best-fit hydrodynamic models of Paper I that reproduce the proper-motion deceleration data. The calculation uses the CR-Hydro code, a one-dimensional Lagrangian hydrodynamics solver coupled to a semi-analytic nonlinear diffusive shock acceleration scheme, which evolves the shock and the cosmic-ray proton and electron distributions and then computes the four non-thermal emission components: synchrotron, inverse Compton, non-thermal bremsstrahlung, and neutral-pion decay. The remnant is divided into 13 azimuthal regions, each evolved separately and integrated to give the full-spectrum prediction. The decisive step is the competition between leptonic and hadronic gamma-ray channels: the cavity's low density keeps inverse-Compton emission dominant and the spectrum hard, while a uniform dense medium makes pion-decay dominant and the spectrum soft. The fit parameters that carry the comparison are the electron-to-proton ratio $K_{\rm ep}$, which sets the overall normalization, and the Alfvén-speed parameter $f_{\rm alf}$, which controls the gamma-ray slope.

What would settle it

Track Tycho's gamma-ray spectrum from 0.1 to 100 TeV with a new-generation Cherenkov telescope array over the next two decades. The wind-MC model predicts a hard, lepton-dominated spectrum today and a sharp rise in flux with a steepening slope once the shock enters the dense shell (roughly by the mid-2020s); if the spectrum instead stays soft and fades gradually, the wind-MC environment in its current smooth form is ruled out. A complementary check is high-resolution CO or infrared mapping: if no clumpy dense gas is found inside the shell, the proposed mechanism for softening the gamma rays would be unavailable.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a circumstellar medium consisting of a low-density wind-like cavity ($\rho(r)\propto r^{-2}$) enclosed by a dense molecular cloud, the environment inferred from the observed deceleration of Tycho's forward shock, is compatible with the remnant's non-thermal spectrum in the radio, X-ray, and GeV-TeV bands, with one notable exception: the predicted gamma-ray spectrum is harder than observed. At an age of roughly 440 years the forward shock in this wind-MC model is still propagating through the rarefied cavity, so the gamma-ray band is dominated by leptonic inverse-Compton emission; in a uniform ambient medium the shock has already reached dense gas and neutral-pion decay from hadronic collisions produces the softer spectrum seen in the data. The paper therefore concludes that the gamma-ray discrepancy is a genuine tension for the smooth one-dimensional wind-MC picture, and that clumpy or multi-dimensional structure in the surrounding clouds could enhance the hadronic component and resolve it. It further predicts that the broadband spectrum will evolve rapidly, with a sharp flux rise and steepening, once the shock grinds into the dense shell within roughly twenty years, unlike the gradual evolution expected for a homogeneous medium.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's central assumption is that the measured forward-shock deceleration is caused by the shock entering a dense molecular cloud, so the wind-like cavity plus dense shell fitted to the proper-motion data is the true environment; if the deceleration instead came from a change in acceleration efficiency, a different gas profile, or projection effects, the predicted gamma-ray hardness would not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the wind-MC environment is correct, Tycho's non-thermal spectrum should show a sharp rise in flux and a steepening gamma-ray slope within roughly the next two decades as the forward shock penetrates the dense shell.
  • The gamma-ray slope becomes a direct diagnostic of the ambient density at the current shock position: a hard, lepton-dominated spectrum means the shock is still in a rarefied cavity, while a soft, hadron-dominated spectrum requires dense target gas.
  • The wind-MC model keeps the single-degenerate scenario viable for Tycho's progenitor, since the wind-like CSM is a natural product of mass loss from the progenitor system.
  • The models reach a cosmic-ray energy fraction near 10 percent of the explosion energy, consistent with supernova remnants as a major source of Galactic cosmic rays, although they do not reach the knee at about $3\times10^{15}$ eV.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension is to simulate the molecular-cloud material as clumpy in three dimensions; if dense clumps boost neutral-pion emission as the paper suggests, the gamma-ray slope becomes a direct measure of CSM clumpiness rather than of average density.
  • The same wind-cavity-plus-cloud reasoning could be applied to other young type Ia remnants with decelerating forward shocks, turning joint proper-motion and spectral data into a probe of single-degenerate versus double-degenerate progenitor channels.
  • If the predicted rapid spectral transition is observed, Tycho would be a rare object whose environmental structure can be probed on human timescales, motivating repeated multi-wavelength monitoring over the next few decades.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper extends the kinematic study of Tycho's supernova remnant from Kobashi et al. (2024, Paper I) to a quantitative investigation of the broadband non-thermal emission. The authors use the one-dimensional, axisymmetric CR-Hydro code, dividing Tycho into 13 azimuthal regions and adopting the wind-cavity plus molecular-cloud density profile inferred in Paper I from Chandra proper-motion data (Model A), a modified version with flat outer density (Model B), and a spherical uniform medium (Model C). Particle acceleration parameters (chi_inj, Kep, sigma_w, falf) are calibrated to the observed radio, X-ray, GeV, and TeV spectrum. The paper finds that Models A and B reproduce the observed fluxes in radio, X-ray, and gamma-ray normalization, but predict a harder gamma-ray spectrum than observed, which they attribute to the low CSM density in the cavity interior and the resulting leptonic dominance. The paper also provides predictions for the long-term spectral evolution and discusses multidimensional and clumpy-medium effects as possible resolutions of the gamma-ray tension.

Significance. If the result holds, this is a valuable first step in connecting the kinematically inferred wind-MC environment of Tycho to its non-thermal radiation. The main strength is that the density profile is independently constrained by proper-motion measurements in Paper I, not by the spectral energy distribution. The paper is transparent about the gamma-ray mismatch and checks the dependence of the results on parameter ranges, explosion center, and projection angle. The predicted spectral evolution over the next decades provides a falsifiable observational target for future X-ray and gamma-ray observations. However, the gamma-ray tension is central to the paper, and its quantitative significance is not fully established, nor is the potential degeneracy between CR pressure and the inferred density profile addressed.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2, Figure 1, Table 1] The density profile of Model A is taken from the best-fit pure-hydrodynamic models of Paper I, which were derived by fitting the T+21 proper-motion data with VH-1 without CR pressure feedback. The present work uses the CR-Hydro code, which includes nonlinear diffusive shock acceleration and CR pressure. Because CR pressure itself decelerates the forward shock, the density enhancement needed to match the observed deceleration is degenerate with the CR acceleration efficiency. A pure-hydro fit may overestimate the density jump (or underestimate the cavity density) if CR feedback is significant. Since the gamma-ray hardness in Models A and B is attributed precisely to the low cavity density, an underestimated cavity density could remove or weaken the reported gamma-ray tension. The paper does not discuss this degeneracy or quantify the CR pressure fraction. I recommend re-fitting the density profile with CR feedback included, or at least estimating the magnitude of the effect.
  2. [Section 3, Figure 2, Table 1] The statement that the wind-MC environment 'predicts a harder gamma-ray spectrum than observed' overstates the predictive content, because the particle acceleration parameters, including falf which controls the gamma-ray spectral index, are calibrated to the observed broadband SED. The gamma-ray tension is therefore a residual of a global fit, not an independent prediction. The density structure is independently constrained, but the conclusion that the gamma-ray slope is incompatible should be clarified. I suggest reporting specifically which features of the gamma-ray spectrum are determined by the environment rather than by the fitted parameters, and rephrasing the claim accordingly.
  3. [Section 3, Figure 3c] The significance of the gamma-ray tension is not quantified. The total chi^2/dof = 144/48 is quoted for the full SED, but the contribution of the gamma-ray band is not given. Given the large error bars on the Fermi-LAT and VERITAS points, it would be useful to know whether the harder spectrum is statistically excluded or merely a visual mismatch. Please provide a band-by-band goodness-of-fit, or at least the chi^2 for the gamma-ray points alone.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'poses a major challenges' should be 'poses a major challenge'.
  2. [Section 2] The phrase 'the two-dentinal projection' should be 'the two-dimensional projection'.
  3. [Section 2] The parenthesis '(for thich the models in the southern hemisphere are used)' contains a typo: 'thich' should be 'which'.
  4. [Table 1] The parameter B0 appears in Table 1 but is never defined in the text; its meaning (likely the upstream magnetic field strength in microgauss) and units should be stated explicitly.
  5. [Section 4] The sentence 'Next-generation telescopes such as the recently launched XRISM will provided new insight' should read 'will provide new insight'.
  6. [Figure 1 caption] The density '0.3mp g cm^-3' should be typeset with a subscript, i.e., '0.3 m_p g cm^-3'.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 3.0 of 10

Gamma-ray 'prediction' is a fit residual because falf is calibrated to the observed spectrum; the density profile itself is independently fit in Paper I.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract; Section 3 (RESULTS AND DISCUSSION), Fig. 2 and Table 1.]
    "While the simulated broadband spectrum based on the wind-MC environment is largely consistent with observations, we find that such an environment predicts a harder gamma-ray spectrum than observed due to the relatively low CSM density in the cavity interior of the MC. ... The critical parameter to our results is Kep, which affects the normalization of the overall spectrum, and falf changes the gamma-ray spectral index."

    The gamma-ray spectral slope is not an independent prediction of the wind-MC model: falf is a free parameter that 'changes the gamma-ray spectral index' and is calibrated to the observed 2012 broadband spectrum, including the GeV/TeV gamma-ray points, in the same fitting step that 'reproduce[s] the observed flux from Tycho in 2012.' The reported 'harder than observed' gamma-ray spectrum is therefore the residual of the fit rather than a pre-fit prediction. The environmental density profile is, however, independently determined from Paper I's fit to T+21 proper-motion data, so the mismatch still carries information; the circularity is in the wording 'predicts' rather than in the underlying model comparison.

full rationale

The paper's central environmental input, the wind-cavity plus dense-shell density profile (Model A), comes from the authors' Paper I, which is a separate fit to T+21 proper-motion data and does not use the broadband spectrum. Hence the core model-data comparison is not circular. The particle-acceleration parameters (χinj, Kep, σw, falf) are, however, calibrated to the observed 2012 SED, and falf is explicitly the parameter that sets the gamma-ray spectral index. Consequently, the abstract's phrasing that the wind-MC environment 'predicts a harder gamma-ray spectrum than observed' describes a fit residual rather than an independent prediction; this is a mild instance of fitted-input-called-prediction. The paper itself is transparent about the imperfect fit (χ2/dof ≈ 144/48, and 'we cannot reproduce the softness'), and the future spectral-evolution predictions in Figures 4 and 5 are genuine after-calibration predictions. No load-bearing self-citation or imported uniqueness theorem occurs: Paper I and the CR-Hydro code are prior results with independent constraints. The cosmic-ray-feedback degeneracy raised by a skeptic is a robustness/correctness concern, not a circularity, because the present paper does not claim to re-derive the density profile from the gamma-ray data.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a chain of adopted inputs: a canonical Type Ia explosion model, a prescribed wind-cavity plus molecular cloud density profile fitted to proper-motion data, and four particle acceleration parameters calibrated to the observed spectrum. None are derived from first principles here; the contribution is testing their joint consistency with broadband data.

free parameters (7)
  • chi_inj (injection parameter) = 3.75 (fiducial; range 3.6-3.9)
    Injection parameter setting the efficiency of thermal leakage into the acceleration process; calibrated to reproduce the observed broadband flux in 2012.
  • Kep (electron-to-proton ratio) = 2.0e-2 (range 2.0e-3 to 2.0e-1)
    Sets the overall normalization and relative leptonic/hadronic contributions to the spectrum.
  • sigma_w (wind magnetization parameter) = 2.0e-2 (range 2.0e-3 to 2.0e-1)
    Controls magnetic field strength and thus synchrotron and inverse Compton emission.
  • falf (Alfven speed spatial variation parameter) = 0.1 (range 0.1-1)
    Affects the gamma-ray spectral index, especially the balance between IC and hadronic components.
  • Mdot/(4*pi*Vw) (wind density normalization) = ~1e13 g/cm (Model A)
    From Paper I fit to T+21 proper-motion data; determines the cavity density profile.
  • rho_outer (outer molecular cloud density) = ~1e-22 g/cm^3 (Model A)
    From Paper I fit to proper-motion data; sets the density of the surrounding cloud.
  • Distance D = 3.5 kpc (geometric center) or 3.7 kpc (pressure center)
    Distance to Tycho; affects luminosity and the density calibration.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption NLDSA theory as implemented in Lee et al. (2012) and Yasuda & Lee (2019)
    Used to compute particle acceleration and radiation; assumptions about the diffusion coefficient and magnetic field amplification are carried from prior work.
  • domain assumption CR-Hydro/VH-1 one-dimensional Lagrangian hydrodynamics
    Solves the SNR evolution; assumes spherical symmetry in each azimuthal sector and neglects non-radial flows.
  • domain assumption Canonical Type Ia ejecta: 1.4 Msun, 1e51 erg, exponential density profile
    A near-Chandrasekhar-mass explosion; other ejecta structures would change the dynamics and emission.
  • ad hoc to paper Wind-cavity plus dense shell density profile in each region (Models A and B)
    The environment is a toy model representing the basic features inferred from proper motion; the density beyond R2015 is extrapolated (Model A) or held constant (Model B).
  • domain assumption Constant particle acceleration parameters across all 13 regions and all epochs
    The same chi_inj, Kep, sigma_w, falf are used for all regions and epochs, an approximation justified by the small region-to-region differences in modeled spectra.
  • domain assumption The T+21 shock deceleration is due to an increasing ambient density
    The entire environment model rests on this interpretation from Paper I; alternatives (e.g., time-dependent acceleration efficiency) are not considered.
  • ad hoc to paper Axisymmetric projection for flux integration (Eq. 1)
    Assumes axial symmetry about an offset azimuth (delta_psi = 260.3 degrees) and uses northern hemisphere spectra as representative; the line-of-sight depth is not modeled.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exploring the circumstellar environment of Tycho's supernova remnant. II. Impact on the broadband non-thermal emission." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VUPOXKYU

@misc{pith2026241207130,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exploring the circumstellar environment of Tycho's supernova remnant. II. Impact on the broadband non-thermal emission},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VUPOXKYU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.07130}
}
read the original abstract

While the environment around Tycho's supernova remnant (SNR) has long been believed to be close to homogeneous, the latest analysis of Chandra data has identified a substantial deceleration of the forward shock which poses a major challenges to this picture. arXiv:2310.14841 showed that the existence of dense molecular cloud (MC) surrounding a rarefied wind-like circumstellar matter (CSM) can explain this observational finding in term of the shock-expansion dynamics, supporting the so-called single-degenerate scenario for the progenitor system. We here extend this work to study the non-thermal emission processes and investigate whether such an environment is consistent with the observed multi-wavelength spectrum. While the simulated broadband spectrum based on the wind-MC environment is largely consistent with observations, we find that such an environment predicts a harder gamma-ray spectrum than observed due to the relatively low CSM density in the cavity interior of the MC. This difference can be at least partially attributed to the present one-dimensional setup of the model which does not account for the clumpy and multi-dimensional structure of the CSM. Our model provides predictions for the long-term evolution of the broadband spectrum which can be used to further probe Tycho's surrounding environment in the future, a key to resolving the long-standing issue of type Ia supernova progenitor channels.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.07130 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The initial density profile of Models A (black solid line; our fiducial model), B (green solid line; modified in a cloud region), and C (grey dashed line; spherical uniform model with the density 0.3mp g cm−3 ) for Region 13 at an age of 30 yr. We use the CR-Hydro code developed by Yasuda & Lee (2019) and Kobashi et al. (2022) (see also references therein) to calculate the hydrodynamic evolution as well as the accom… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Broadband non-thermal emission spectrum which has the solid angle of 4π when varying and calibrating param￾eters for particle acceleration using the dynamical parame￾ters of Region 13. The data points with error bars show the observed fluxes from radio observations (Kothes et al. 2006), X-ray data from Swift/BAT (Troja et al. 2014), GeV gamma-ray data from Fermi-LAT (Archambault et al. 2017; Giordano et al. 2012), a… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Spectral models of the broadband non-thermal emission of Tycho at an age of 440 yrs (or in the year of 2012). The data points are same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Predictions on the broadband SED including epochs of 2042, 2272 when the shock has already been interacting with the cloud. The data points are the same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The light curve of the leptonic/hadronic gamma-rays for Model A (solid lines), Model B (dashed lines) and Model C (dotted lines). For our new Models A and B, the leptonic emission via IC is found to be brightening gradually before the interaction with clouds, and after…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Time evolution of a few selected key quantities predicted by our three models. The vertical lines again show the year 1822, 1972, 2012, 2042 and 2272 for reference. Panel (a): Time evolution of the shown properties in Region 2 from Model A (solid lines), Model B (dashe…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Time evolution of maximum momentum of pro￾tons in Model A and other models with different acceleration efficiencies χinj shown with a smaller timestep. Time evolu￾tion of particle acceleration physics from the region with the highest pmax reached (Region 7) is a fiduci…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    H&(1 d1g UpR-Q tt HNv g =; -y_B d 8Dז 'D ?D'@G6ٮ a L _sW:̈́ IH@SMC& @Nt/KS !!BL!T>) @s訬:)Gu XhΤ q o> 8[eV 0Ӻ 賠01 oR #i v,d A!- ^ BfEZ^ Ɉ:Y JѮ MB @N'U yjBP ) 2 h(N1 c LqB !@

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command E...

    2021

  4. [4]

    A., Aliu , E., Arlen , T., et al

    Acciari , V. A., Aliu , E., Arlen , T., et al. 2011, , 730, L20, 10.1088/2041-8205/730/2/L20

    doi:10.1088/2041-8205/730/2/l20 2011

  5. [5]

    2017, , 836, 23, 10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/23

    Archambault , S., Archer , A., Benbow , W., et al. 2017, , 836, 23, 10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/23

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/23 2017

  6. [6]

    J., Hughes , J

    Badenes , C., Borkowski , K. J., Hughes , J. P., Hwang , U., & Bravo , E. 2006, , 645, 1373, 10.1086/504399

    doi:10.1086/504399 2006

  7. [7]

    1987, , 154, 1, 10.1016/0370-1573(87)90134-7

    Blandford , R., & Eichler , D. 1987, , 154, 1, 10.1016/0370-1573(87)90134-7

    doi:10.1016/0370-1573(87)90134-7 1987

  8. [8]

    M., & Ellison , D

    Blondin , J. M., & Ellison , D. C. 2001, , 560, 244, 10.1086/322499

    doi:10.1086/322499 2001

Show all 38 references
  1. [9]

    M., Vink , J., & Kaastra , J

    Chiotellis , A., Kosenko , D., Schure , K. M., Vink , J., & Kaastra , J. S. 2013, , 435, 1659, 10.1093/mnras/stt1406

    2013 doi

  2. [10]

    2023, , 958, 3, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad00b1

    Diesing , R. 2023, , 958, 3, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad00b1

    2023 doi

  3. [11]

    V., & Chevalier , R

    Dwarkadas , V. V., & Chevalier , R. A. 1998, , 497, 807, 10.1086/305478

    1998 doi

  4. [12]

    C., Ono, M., et al

    Ferrand, G., Warren, D. C., Ono, M., et al. 2019, , 877, 136, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1a3d

    2019 doi

  5. [13]

    D., Castro , D., Slane , P

    Gelfand , J. D., Castro , D., Slane , P. O., et al. 2013, , 777, 148, 10.1088/0004-637X/777/2/148

    2013 doi

  6. [14]

    2012, , 744, L2, 10.1088/2041-8205/744/1/L2

    Giordano , F., Naumann-Godo , M., Ballet , J., et al. 2012, , 744, L2, 10.1088/2041-8205/744/1/L2

    2012 doi

  7. [15]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.17296, 10.48550/arXiv.2404.17296

    Godinaud , L., Acero , F., Decourchelle , A., & Ballet , J. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.17296, 10.48550/arXiv.2404.17296

    2024 doi arXiv

  8. [16]

    2019, , 872, 46, 10.3847/1538-4357/aafb70

    Inoue , T. 2019, , 872, 46, 10.3847/1538-4357/aafb70

    2019 doi

  9. [17]

    2021, , 922, 7, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac21ce

    Inoue , T., Marcowith , A., Giacinti , G., Jan van Marle , A., & Nishino , S. 2021, , 922, 7, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac21ce

    2021 doi

  10. [18]

    2012, , 744, 71, 10.1088/0004-637X/744/1/71

    Inoue , T., Yamazaki , R., Inutsuka , S.-i., & Fukui , Y. 2012, , 744, 71, 10.1088/0004-637X/744/1/71

    2012 doi

  11. [19]

    2024, , 961, 32, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad05c2

    Kobashi , R., Lee , S.-H., Tanaka , T., & Maeda , K. 2024, , 961, 32, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad05c2

    2024 doi

  12. [20]

    2022, , 936, 26, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac80f9

    Kobashi , R., Yasuda , H., & Lee , S.-H. 2022, , 936, 26, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac80f9

    2022 doi

  13. [21]

    J., & Uyan ker , B

    Kothes , R., Fedotov , K., Foster , T. J., & Uyan ker , B. 2006, , 457, 1081, 10.1051/0004-6361:20065062

    2006 doi

  14. [22]

    2008, , 456, 617, 10.1038/nature07608

    Krause , O., Tanaka , M., Usuda , T., et al. 2008, , 456, 617, 10.1038/nature07608

    2008 doi

  15. [23]

    C., & Nagataki , S

    Lee , S.-H., Ellison , D. C., & Nagataki , S. 2012, , 750, 156. 1203.3614

    2012 arXiv

  16. [24]

    J., Park , S., Sato , T., et al

    Millard , M. J., Park , S., Sato , T., et al. 2022, , 937, 121, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8f30

    2022 doi

  17. [25]

    2012, , 538, A81, 10.1051/0004-6361/201117855

    Morlino , G., & Caprioli , D. 2012, , 538, A81, 10.1051/0004-6361/201117855

    2012 doi

  18. [26]

    M., Moffett , D

    Reynoso , E. M., Moffett , D. A., Goss , W. M., et al. 1997, , 491, 816, 10.1086/304997

    1997 doi

  19. [27]

    2023, , 672, A194, 10.1051/0004-6361/202244809

    Rigon , G., & Inoue , T. 2023, , 672, A194, 10.1051/0004-6361/202244809

    2023 doi

  20. [28]

    C., et al

    Slane , P., Lee , S.-H., Ellison , D. C., et al. 2014, , 783, 33, 10.1088/0004-637X/783/1/33

    2014 doi

  21. [29]

    2021, , 906, L3, 10.3847/2041-8213/abd6cf

    Tanaka , T., Okuno , T., Uchida , H., et al. 2021, , 906, L3, 10.3847/2041-8213/abd6cf

    2021 doi

  22. [30]

    2014, , 797, L6, 10.1088/2041-8205/797/1/L6

    Troja , E., Segreto , A., La Parola , V., et al. 2014, , 797, L6, 10.1088/2041-8205/797/1/L6

    2014 doi

  23. [31]

    2024, , 962, 159, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1ff3

    Uchida , H., Kasuga , T., Maeda , K., et al. 2024, , 962, 159, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1ff3

    2024 doi

  24. [32]

    F., Gomez , D

    Velazquez , P. F., Gomez , D. O., Dubner , G. M., de Castro , G. G., & Costa , A. 1998, , 334, 1060

    1998

  25. [33]

    S., Hughes , J

    Warren , J. S., Hughes , J. P., Badenes , C., et al. 2005, , 634, 376, 10.1086/496941

    2005 doi

  26. [34]

    J., Borkowski , K

    Williams , B. J., Borkowski , K. J., Ghavamian , P., et al. 2013, , 770, 129, 10.1088/0004-637X/770/2/129

    2013 doi

  27. [35]

    J., Chomiuk , L., Hewitt , J

    Williams , B. J., Chomiuk , L., Hewitt , J. W., et al. 2016, , 823, L32, 10.3847/2041-8205/823/2/L32

    2016 doi

  28. [36]

    2022, , 930, 151, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac634b

    Xing , Y., Wang , Z., Zhang , X., & Chen , Y. 2022, , 930, 151, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac634b

    2022 doi

  29. [37]

    2019, , 876, 27, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab13ab

    Yasuda , H., & Lee , S.-H. 2019, , 876, 27, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab13ab

    2019 doi

  30. [38]

    2016, , 826, 34, 10.3847/0004-637X/826/1/34

    Zhou , P., Chen , Y., Zhang , Z.-Y., et al. 2016, , 826, 34, 10.3847/0004-637X/826/1/34

    2016 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.