Pith. sign in

REVIEW

When does an impacting drop stop bouncing?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2208.05935 v2 pith:VUQIDLMU submitted 2022-08-11 physics.flu-dyn cond-mat.soft

classification physics.flu-dyncond-mat.soft
keywords bouncingdropenergytransitionviscouscriteriondropsheavy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Non-wetting substrates allow impacting liquid drops to spread, recoil, and takeoff, provided they are not too heavy (Biance et al. 2006) or too viscous (Jha et al. 2020). In this article, using direct numerical simulations with the volume of fluid method, we investigate how viscous stresses and gravity conspire against capillarity to inhibit drop rebound. Close to the bouncing to non-bouncing transition, we evidence that the initial spreading stage can be decoupled from the later retraction and takeoff, allowing to understand the rebound as a process converting the surface energy of the spread liquid into kinetic energy. Drawing an analogy with coalescence induced jumping, we propose a criterion for the transition from the bouncing to the non-bouncing regime, namely by the condition $Oh_c + Bo_c \sim 1$, where $Oh_c$ and $Bo_c$ are the Ohnesorge number and Bond number at the transition, respectively. This criterion is in excellent agreement with the numerical results. We also elucidate the mechanisms of bouncing inhibition in the heavy and viscous drops limiting regimes by calculating the energy budgets and relating them to the drop's shape and internal flow.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools