Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Junction Conditions and local Spacetimes in General Relativity

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that joining two spacetimes can be done by locally deforming one metric into the other, that all standard junction conditions become conditions on the deformation fields, and that in the Kerr-Schild class even…

desk verdict A useful reformulation of thin-shell gluing, but the central claim about delta-square suppression is asserted, not proved, and needs a real Colombeau computation. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.08735 v4 pith:VVPU7WPM submitted 2019-08-23 gr-qc

Albert Huber This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc
keywords generalrelativityjunctionconditionsthin-shellformalismlocalmetricdeformationsKerr-SchildmetricsColombeaugeneralizedfunctionsdistributionalgravitationalshockwaves
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to replace the usual picture of joining two spacetimes along a boundary, where one imposes matching conditions on the induced metric and extrinsic curvature and allows a singular surface layer, with a picture of local metric deformation. The claim is that any valid thin-shell junction condition can be rewritten as a condition on a pair of deformation fields, and that by using smooth transition functions instead of step functions, any two spacetimes can be joined smoothly without a singular source layer. The paper further claims that for the generalized Kerr-Schild class of metrics, distributional metrics containing a Dirac-delta term can be glued rigorously inside Colombeau's algebra of generalized functions: the squared-delta products that block standard treatments drop out, and the field equations become linear in the profile $f = f_0\,\delta$. A reader should care because this would clear a known obstruction: gravitational shock-wave spacetimes and other low-regularity metrics that thin-shell formalism cannot handle would become tractable, with the usual formalism returning as a limiting case.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the local metric deformation pair: an ambient metric and its inverse are written as $g_{\pm ab} + e_{\pm ab}$ and $g_{\pm}^{ab} + f_{\pm}^{ab}$, where $e_{\pm}$ and $f_{\pm}$ are supported only in the complement of the local region $M_{\pm}$. The difference tensor $C^{\pm a}{}_{bc} = \tfrac{1}{2}(g_{\pm}^{ad}+f_{\pm}^{ad})(\nabla^{\pm}_b e_{\pm dc}+\nabla^{\pm}_c e_{\pm bd}-\nabla^{\pm}_d e_{\pm bc})$ encodes the curvature shift $E^{\pm a}{}_{bcd} = 2\nabla^{\pm}_{[c}C^{\pm a}{}_{d]b}+2C^{\pm a}{}_{e[c}C^{\pm e}{}_{d]b}$, so the Einstein equations split into local equations $G_{\pm ab} = 8\pi T_{\pm ab}$ plus deformation corrections $\rho_{\pm ab} = 8\pi\tau_{\pm ab}$. In the distributional case the second mechanism is Colombeau's algebra of generalized functions, which replaces Dirac's delta by a net of smooth functions and permits nonlinear products; for generalized Kerr-Schild metrics the identities $C^{c}{}_{d[c}C^{d}{}_{b]a} \approx 0$ and the constraints (60)--(64) remove the delta-square terms and make the field equations linear in $f = f_0\,\delta$. The smooth transition functions $\chi_L(x) = (1+e^{(x-x_0)/L})^{-1}$ serve as the bridge: in the limit $L\to 0$ they reproduce the Heaviside step function and hence the thin-shell junction conditions.

What would settle it

Take a generalized Kerr-Schild metric $\bar{g}_{ab} = g_{ab} + f_0\,\delta\,l_a l_b$, compute the deformed Ricci tensor using two different delta regularizations, for instance one with $\delta^2 \approx 0$ and one with $\delta^2 \approx c\delta$, and check whether the Einstein tensor is still linear in $f = f_0\,\delta$ and satisfies the consistency conditions (60)--(64). If any admissible regularization produces residual delta-square terms or a regularization-dependent inverse metric, the central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that gluing two Lorentzian manifolds can be carried out by deforming the ambient metric locally rather than by cutting and pasting. Writing $g_{ab} = g_{\pm ab} + e_{\pm ab}$ and $g^{ab} = g_{\pm}^{ab} + f_{\pm}^{ab}$, with deformation fields $e_{\pm}$ and $f_{\pm}$ that vanish, or have compact support, outside the local region, the junction conditions $[h_{ab}] = 0$ and the shell equation $[K_{ab}] = 8\pi\epsilon(\tau_{ab} - \tfrac{1}{2}h_{ab}\tau)$ become conditions on the deformation fields, namely $[e_{ab}] = [f^{ab}] = 0$ together with either $[C^{a}{}_{bc}] = 0$ or the weaker shell conditions. If the step function is replaced by a smooth transition function, the boundary becomes a transition region and the join becomes smooth; the thin-shell junction conditions are recovered when the transition-region scale $L$ tends to zero. For distributional metrics, combining this deformation picture with Colombeau algebras of generalized functions shows that in the generalized Kerr-Schild class $\bar{g}_{ab} = g_{ab} + f\,l_a l_b$ the field equations are linear in $f \equiv f_0\,\delta$, with the nonlinear terms $C^{c}{}_{d[c}C^{d}{}_{b]a} \approx 0$ and the consistency conditions (60)--(64) satisfied independently of the delta regularization. This is what makes gravitational shock-wave spacetimes, whose standard curvature calculation contains squares of the delta distribution, glueable within the framework.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that some physically acceptable way of smoothing the Dirac delta makes the squared-delta products drop out of the Kerr-Schild field equations; if every smoothing leaves delta-square terms behind, the advertised extension to shock-wave spacetimes collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Gravitational shock-wave spacetimes with profiles proportional to $\delta(U)$ can be glued, and their field equations reduce to a single equation $(\Delta - c)f_0 = 2\pi b\,\delta$, solvable by a Legendre expansion.
  • The standard thin-shell junction conditions are recovered exactly when the width of the transition region goes to zero, so the formalism contains the Darmois-Israel and null-shell rules as limits rather than replacing them.
  • Any pair of local spacetimes can be joined smoothly by choosing transition functions with compact support, so a singular stress-energy layer at the boundary is not forced.
  • The Einstein-Hilbert action and the field equations decompose into local subactions $S[g_i]+\Sigma[g_i,e_i,f_i]$, which lets the local spacetime structure change while the ambient metric is unchanged.
  • The deformation picture includes perturbative general relativity as a special case, and null rescalings or null rotations of the Kerr-Schild vector field generate new ambient spacetimes from a known background.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Not drawn in the paper: the regularization-independence shown for the Kerr-Schild class suggests a testable hierarchy, namely that superimposed Kerr-Schild deformations may reintroduce delta-square terms, and the paper's own caution about careful curvature calculations leaves open whether only single Kerr-Schild layers are safe.
  • An extension the paper does not make: use the same transition-function gluing to decide, for a given pair of solutions, whether a smooth transition can satisfy the energy conditions in the overlap; the paper invokes energy conditions but does not classify which transitions are admissible.
  • The Gordon-class ambiguity in the inverse metric implies the framework alone does not pick a delta regularization; a natural test is whether requiring the dominant energy condition or a shock-wave limit selects one of the $\delta^2 \approx 0$ versus $\delta^2 \approx c\delta$ choices.
  • If the linearity claims hold for all admissible regularizations, then the Kerr-Schild class becomes the natural distributional-geometry arena for a rigorous thin-shell extension, and one could export the same deformation language to higher-curvature or metric-affine gravitational theories where junction conditions are less settled.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a framework for joining Lorentzian spacetimes by local metric deformations. The central idea is to write the ambient metric as a deformed version of two local metrics, to reformulate the Darmois-Israel and general thin-shell junction conditions in terms of deformation fields, and to use smooth transition functions so that arbitrary spacetime pairs can be joined in a transition region. The paper then claims that, using Colombeau's theory of generalized functions, distributional metrics of Kerr-Schild type can be glued with field equations that are linear in the delta profile, avoiding ill-defined delta-square terms. Examples from gravitational shock wave spacetimes and Bonnor-Vaidya transitions are presented as applications.

Significance. If the main claims were fully established, the framework would unify several known gluing techniques and would provide a practical way of treating distributional Kerr-Schild metrics for which the standard thin-shell formalism gives ill-defined products of distributions. The paper correctly reproduces the known Sfetsos shock-wave equation and shows that the thin-shell junction conditions emerge as a special case in the zero-width limit. However, the central technical step—the regularization-independence of the vanishing of delta-square terms in the Kerr-Schild case—is asserted and deferred to the author's own Ref. [24] rather than demonstrated. In addition, the 'deformed field equations' of Section 2 are largely identities obtained by rearranging Einstein's equations, so the advertised generality needs to be formulated with more care. The significance is therefore conditional: the paper gives a useful organizing framework and a precise conjecture, but not yet a fully verified proof of the main new capability.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3, Eqs. (60)-(64)] The claim that the generalized Kerr-Schild field equations are linear in f = f0 δ and that terms such as C^c_{d[c} C^d_{b]a} ≈ 0 and E_ab l^a l^b ≈ 0 hold 'regardless of the choice of regularization' is load-bearing for the paper's central advantage over the thin-shell formalism. The manuscript gives only a sketch and cites Refs. [47] and [24] (the latter a self-citation), without providing the actual computation or a theorem with hypotheses on the strict delta net, the profile f0, and the null vector la. This matters because the same section demonstrates for the Gordon class that the inverse metric and curvature are regularization-dependent (Eqs. (48)-(50)), with δ² ≈ 0 and δ² ≈ cδ both admissible in Colombeau theory. Unless a detailed proof is supplied, the advertised result that no admissible regularization leaves delta-square terms is not established.
  2. [Section 2, Eqs. (23), (27)] The 'deformed field equations' ρ±ab = 8πτ±ab are identities rather than independent equations: ρ±ab is constructed from E±ab, which encodes the departure of the ambient metric from the local metric, while τ±ab = T_ab − T±ab is defined as the corresponding departure in the stress-energy tensor. Given G±ab = 8πT±ab, Eq. (23) is just a rearrangement of Einstein's equations, and Eq. (27) states the same information already contained in the definitions. The text says these equations 'can be determined independently' and that the junction conditions are derived, but this is circular unless the framework specifies which quantities are to be solved for. Please state clearly that (27) is a reformulation and identify the independent unknowns, or the paper's claim to provide a new geometric framework is overstated.
  3. [Section 3, paragraph on smooth gluing of arbitrary spacetime pairs] The claim that 'in principle, a smooth geometric transition always exists for arbitrary spacetime pairs' is vacuous if the interpolating metric is allowed to be arbitrary, since every metric defines an Einstein tensor and hence some stress-energy tensor. Without imposing that the interpolating metric is globally Lorentzian and that the resulting stress-energy satisfies physically motivated energy conditions, the assertion of 'cannot fail' is not a theorem in the sense that seems to be claimed. Please state the precise conditions under which the construction yields a physically admissible ambient spacetime, or scale back the claim to the statement that the transition can be made smooth in a purely geometric sense.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (59)] Equation (59) writes the inverse metric as gab − f0δ·nanb, but the Kerr-Schild inverse should be expressed using the same null vector lab as in Eq. (58); the appearance of nanb appears to be a typographical error.
  2. [Section 2, Eq. (25)] The transition function χ(x) is described as 'strictly increasing in the interval [0,1]', but by construction it is identically zero for x < 0, identically one for x ≥ x0, and strictly increasing only on (0,x0); the interval should be stated accordingly.
  3. [Section 1, Eq. (1) and surrounding text] The notation g±ab is introduced for both the metric and, later, the inverse metric pieces; this overloaded notation makes several equations in Section 2 harder to follow than necessary, and a clearer typographic distinction would help.
  4. [Throughout] The manuscript contains many typos and grammatical errors (e.g., 'Heavyside', 'condidered', 'woth', 'distrubtional', 'introcued', 'traces back'), and the prose is often repetitive; careful editing is needed before publication.

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The deformed field equations and the 'cannot fail' smooth gluing are identities/constructions, and the distributional Kerr-Schild linearity (no δ²) is imported from a self-citation.

  1. self definitional [Section 2, Eq. (27) (paragraph after transition functions)]
    "Since in all these approaches, the full Einstein equations (22) reduce to the restricted local Einstein equations G±ab = 8πT±ab on (M±,g±), it becomes clear that the remaining equations ρ±ab = 8πτ±ab, (27), can be determined independently in agreement with the introduced junction conditions, where, of course, τ±ab :=Tab −T±ab applies in the given context."

    Equation (23) is G±_ab + ρ±_ab = 8πT_ab. Once G±_ab = 8πT±_ab is imposed, subtracting leaves ρ±_ab = 8π(T_ab − T±_ab). Since τ±_ab is defined to be exactly T_ab − T±_ab, Eq. (27) is the same statement rewritten; it is not an independent condition determined by the deformation. Any deformation fields e±, f± produce some ρ±, and the corresponding τ± defined by the difference makes the equation true automatically. Thus the 'deformed field equations' are a rearrangement of Einstein's equations by definition.

  2. self definitional [Section 2, paragraph after Eq. (43), with Eq. (33)]
    "In this context, as it turns out, the main advantage of the geometric deformation approach compared to thin-shell formalism is that it cannot fail in the sense that, in principle, a smooth geometric transition always exists for arbitrary spacetime pairs."

    This guarantee is built into the construction. The deformation fields e±_ab and f^±ab are chosen to have compact support in M\M± and are multiplied by transition functions χ±, so condition (33) (e±=f±=0, C±=0 on Σ±) holds identically; the transition region O is then assigned a stress-energy tensor τ defined by Eq. (27) as the remainder needed to satisfy Einstein's equations. Therefore 'arbitrary spacetime pairs can always be smoothly joined' is not a derived physical result but a consequence of defining the transition function and the confined source so that the equations hold.

1 more flagged steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Section 3, Eqs. (60)-(64)]
    "Moreover, as shown in [24], also the Einstein tensor with lowered and raised indices are linear in f ≡ f0 ·δ if the geometric constraints (60) are met. ... As it then turns out in this context, the conditions C^c_ad C^d_cb ≈ 0 and ∇^c C_cab l^a ≈ 0, ∇^c C_cab l^b ≈ 0, E^a_b l^a l^b ≈ 0 (64) are met regardless of the choice of regularization of the delta distribution."

    The central distributional claim is that the δ²-type product C^c_ad C^d_cb vanishes so that the field equations are linear in f=f0δ. The paper supplies no computation proving (63)-(64) for arbitrary strict delta nets; the distributional statement is attributed to the author's own Ref. [24]. This is load-bearing, because if an admissible regularization leaves a residual δ² term, the advertised advantage over thin-shell gluing collapses. The same section demonstrates for the Gordon class that inverse metrics and δ² products are regularization-dependent and concedes 'there is no silver bullet,' so the Kerr-Schild exception cannot be taken as a standard mathematical fact. The derivation terminates at a self-citation for its decisive identity.

full rationale

Much of the paper is an exact algebraic reformulation: the deformation relations (15)-(21), the decomposition of the Riemann/Ricci tensors, and the action identities (41)-(43) are definitions, not circular predictions. The independent-looking applications, such as the shock-wave profile equation (67) and its Legendre solution (68), are standard external results and are not themselves circular. However, the advertised new content is partly definitional: Eq. (27) is τ:=T−T±, so the 'deformed field equations' restate Einstein's equations; the 'smooth gluing cannot fail' claim follows from choosing compact-support transition functions and defining the transition-region source accordingly; and the decisive distributional no-δ² result for Kerr-Schild metrics is imported from the author's own Ref. [24] without a computation in this paper. These are not merely minor self-citations: they support the central claims that the framework generalizes thin-shell formalism and that distributional metrics can be glued with linear field equations. Because there is also genuine non-circular content (the reformulations are internally consistent, and several worked shock-wave calculations are standard), the appropriate score is 6 rather than higher.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The ledger shows what is added beyond standard tools. The free parameters are dominated by the delta regularization choice, which the paper itself says changes results in the Gordon class, and by the transition-region scales x0 and L that define the smooth interpolation. The axioms include the embedding of the delta distribution into a Colombeau algebra with chosen δ² behavior and the C1 regularity of the decomposed tensor fields. The only invented objects are the transition region and the local spacetime partitions, both definitional with no falsifiable handles. The physical solutions displayed are the known shock wave and Bonnor-Vaidya families, so the framework's new content is the packaging and the claimed regularization control, not new predictions.

free parameters (4)
  • Delta regularization choice (delta net δε and delta-square model) = not fixed; δ² ≈ 0 or δ² ≈ cδ are both admissible
    The paper states that different regularizations give different inverse metrics and physics for the Gordon class (Eqs. (48)-(50)) and that Colombeau theory provides no unique answer; the Kerr-Schild class is claimed to be immune, but no physical principle selects the regularization.
  • Transition region scale x0 and width L = chosen by hand
    The transition functions (25) and (71) introduce a free location and width for the smooth transition region O; the physical content of the interpolation depends on these choices, and the paper only checks energy conditions afterwards.
  • Association constant A in θδ ≈ Aδ = arbitrary constant
    Used to convert the distributional split (1) into the effective delta metric; the value of A changes the effective profile f0 = A f0+ + (1-A) f0-.
  • Bonnor-Vaidya transition parameters m0, e0, v0 = arbitrary constants
    The paper states m(v) and e(v) may be chosen arbitrarily; these set the amount and duration of accretion in the smooth transition model.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The delta distribution is realized by a strict delta net δε in a Colombeau algebra with an assumed model for δ² (either ≈ 0 or ≈ cδ).
    Section 3; the entire distributional-gluing claim depends on this choice, and the paper concedes different choices give different results for the Gordon class.
  • domain assumption The tensor fields g±ab and g±ab defined by (15)-(16) are at least C1.
    Section 2, before Eq. (17); needed for the connection and curvature decompositions to be defined.
  • domain assumption The Gordon-class example assumes a covariantly constant timelike normal na with ∇anb = 0 and gabnanb = -1.
    Section 3, before Eq. (46); restricts the example to very special backgrounds.
  • domain assumption When transition functions are used, the manifold partition becomes M = M- ∪ O ∪ M+ with new boundary hypersurfaces Σ±.
    Section 2, transition-function discussion; this changes the object of study from two glued spacetimes to three regions.
  • standard math Standard results from Lorentzian geometry and distribution theory, including the distributional derivative rule (4) and the Riemann decomposition (7).
    Section 1, Eqs. (3)-(9); background from the cited thin-shell literature.
invented entities (2)
  • Transition region (O, g) as a third spacetime partition
    purpose: Carries the smooth interpolation between local spacetimes (M±, g±); its boundaries Σ± are the new junction surfaces.
    A formal construction with no falsifiable handle; the paper gives no physical principle fixing the interpolating geometry, and matter content is checked only afterwards via energy conditions.
  • Local spacetimes (M±, g±) defined by compactly supported deformation fields
    purpose: Lets a metric be a genuine metric only inside a region and a bare tensor field outside it.
    Definitional bookkeeping; all physical predictions are imported from the known background solutions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Junction Conditions and local Spacetimes in General Relativity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VVPU7WPM

@misc{pith2026190808735,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Junction Conditions and local Spacetimes in General Relativity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VVPU7WPM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.08735}
}
read the original abstract

In the present work, a theoretical framework focussing on local geometric deformations is introduced in order to cope with the problem of how to join spacetimes with different geometries and physical properties. Using this framework, it is shown that two Lorentzian manifolds can be matched in agreement with the well-known Darmois-Israel junction conditions by locally deforming the associated spacetime metrics in relation to each other. Based on the insight that metrics can be suitably matched in this way, it is shown that the underlying geometric approach allows the characterization of local spacetimes in General Relativity. In addition, it is shown that this approach allows the treatment of problems that cannot be treated by using standard gluing techniques.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Covariant Distributional Approach for Junctions in Torsional Locally Rotationally Symmetric Class II Spacetimes

    gr-qc 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A covariant distributional framework yields junction and smooth-matching conditions for torsional locally rotationally symmetric spacetimes in Einstein-Cartan theory.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [24]

    Distributional metrics and the action pr inciple of Einstein- Hilbert gravity

    Albert Huber. Distributional metrics and the action pr inciple of Einstein- Hilbert gravity. Classical and Quantum Gravity , 37(8)

    work page

  2. [47]

    Generalised kerr-schild space-times

    AH Taub. Generalised kerr-schild space-times. Annals of Physics , 134(2):326–372, 1981

    work page 1981

  3. [1]

    On the gravitat ional field of a massless particle

    Peter C Aichelburg and Roman Ulrich Sexl. On the gravitat ional field of a massless particle. General Relativity and Gravitation , 2(4):303–312, 1971

    work page 1971

  4. [2]

    Gordon and Kerr-Schild ansätze in massive and bimetric gravity

    Valentina Baccetti, Prado Martin-Moruno, and Matt Viss er. Gordon and Kerr-Schild ansätze in massive and bimetric gravity. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2012(8):1–19, 2012

    work page 2012

  5. [3]

    Anal ogue gravity from Bose-Einstein condensates

    Carlos Barcelo, Stefano Liberati, and Matt Visser. Anal ogue gravity from Bose-Einstein condensates. Classical and Quantum Gravity , 18(6):1137, 2001

    work page 2001

  6. [4]

    Thin shells in general relativit y and cosmology: The lightlike limit

    C Barrabes and W Israel. Thin shells in general relativit y and cosmology: The lightlike limit. Physical Review D , 43(4):1129, 1991

    work page 1991

  7. [5]

    Physics and initial data for multiple black hole spacetimes

    Erin Bonning, Pedro Marronetti, David Neilsen, and Rich ard Matzner. Physics and initial data for multiple black hole spacetimes . Physical Review D, 68(4):044019, 2003

    work page 2003

  8. [6]

    Spherically symmetric radiatio n of charge in Einstein-Maxwell theory

    WB Bonnor and PC Vaidya. Spherically symmetric radiatio n of charge in Einstein-Maxwell theory. General Relativity and Gravitation, 1(2):127–130, 1970

    work page 1970

Show all 49 references
  1. [7]

    Is the gravitational acti on additive? Phys- ical Review D , 50(8):4914, 1994

    Dieter Brill and Geoff Hayward. Is the gravitational acti on additive? Phys- ical Review D , 50(8):4914, 1994

    1994

  2. [8]

    Quasilocal energy and co n- served charges derived from the gravitational action

    J David Brown and James W York Jr. Quasilocal energy and co n- served charges derived from the gravitational action. Physical Review D , 47(4):1407, 1993

    1993

  3. [9]

    Axisymmetric black hole has only two deg rees of freedom

    Brandon Carter. Axisymmetric black hole has only two deg rees of freedom. Physical Review Letters , 26(6):331, 1971

    1971

  4. [10]

    Junction conditions for nu ll hypersurfaces

    CJ]S Clarke and Tevian Dray. Junction conditions for nu ll hypersurfaces. Classical and Quantum Gravity , 4(2):265, 1987

    1987

  5. [11]

    New generalized functions and multiplication of distributions

    Jean François Colombeau. New generalized functions and multiplication of distributions. Elsevier, 2000

    2000

  6. [12]

    Elementary introduction to new generalized functions

    Jean François Colombeau. Elementary introduction to new generalized functions. Elsevier, 2011. 33

    2011

  7. [13]

    Les équations de la gravitation einst einienne

    Georges Darmois. Les équations de la gravitation einst einienne. Mémorial des sciences mathématiques , 25:1–48, 1927

    1927

  8. [14]

    Massive Gravity

    Claudia de Rham. Massive Gravity. Living Rev. Rel , 17(7):1401–4173, 2014

    2014

  9. [15]

    The gravitational shoc k wave of a massless particle

    Tevian Dray and Gerard’t Hooft. The gravitational shoc k wave of a massless particle. Nuclear physics B , 253:173–188, 1985

    1985

  10. [16]

    Relativistic Bose-Einstein condensa tes: a new system for analogue models of gravity

    Serena Fagnocchi, Stefano Finazzi, Stefano Liberati, Marton Kormos, and Andrea Trombettoni. Relativistic Bose-Einstein condensa tes: a new system for analogue models of gravity. New Journal of Physics , 12(9):095012, 2010

    2010

  11. [17]

    On relativistic wave e quations for par- ticles of arbitrary spin in an electromagnetic field

    Markus Fierz and Wolfgang Pauli. On relativistic wave e quations for par- ticles of arbitrary spin in an electromagnetic field. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Scien ces, pages 211–232, 1939

    1939

  12. [18]

    Zur Lichtfortpflanzung nach der Relativ itätstheorie

    Walter Gordon. Zur Lichtfortpflanzung nach der Relativ itätstheorie. An- nalen der Physik , 377(22):421–456, 1923

    1923

  13. [19]

    Geometric theory of generalized functions with applications to general rela tivity, volume 537

    Grosser, Kunzinger, Oberguggenberger, and Steinbaue r. Geometric theory of generalized functions with applications to general rela tivity, volume 537. Springer Science & Business Media, 2001

    2001

  14. [20]

    Bimetric gravity from ghost-free massive gravity

    S Fawad Hassan and Rachel A Rosen. Bimetric gravity from ghost-free massive gravity. Journal of High Energy Physics , 2012(2):1–12, 2012

    2012

  15. [21]

    The large scale structure of space-time , volume 1

    Stephen W Hawking and George Francis Rayner Ellis. The large scale structure of space-time , volume 1. Cambridge university press, 1973

    1973

  16. [22]

    Gravitational action for spacetimes wit h nonsmooth boundaries

    Geoff Hayward. Gravitational action for spacetimes wit h nonsmooth boundaries. Physical Review D , 47(8):3275, 1993

    1993

  17. [23]

    Analogue gravit y models from con- formal rescaling

    Sabine Hossenfelder and Tobias Zingg. Analogue gravit y models from con- formal rescaling. Classical and quantum gravity , 34(16):165004, 2017

    2017

  18. [25]

    The gravitational Field of a massless Par ticle on the Horizon of a stationary Black Hole

    Albert Huber. The gravitational Field of a massless Par ticle on the Horizon of a stationary Black Hole. arXiv:1911.02299

    1911 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Nonlinear r ealizations of space-time symmetries

    Chris J Isham, Abdus Salam, and J Strathdee. Nonlinear r ealizations of space-time symmetries. Scalar and tensor gravity. Annals of Physics , 62(1):98–119, 1971

    1971

  20. [27]

    Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity

    Werner Israel. Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity. Il Nuovo Cimento B Series 10 , 44(1):1–14, 1966. 34

    1966

  21. [28]

    On the distributions δk and (δ’) k

    EL Koh and Li Chen Kuan. On the distributions δk and (δ’) k. Mathema- tische Nachrichten , 157(1):243–248, 1992

    1992

  22. [29]

    On defining the distributio nsδk and (δ′) k by fractional derivatives

    Chenkuan Li and Changpin Li. On defining the distributio nsδk and (δ′) k by fractional derivatives. Applied Mathematics and Computation , 246:502– 513, 2014

    2014

  23. [30]

    A review on the products of distributions

    CK Li. A review on the products of distributions. In Mathematical methods in engineering , pages 71–96. Springer, 2007

    2007

  24. [31]

    The ultrarelativistic limit of the Kerr-Newman geometry and particle scattering at the Planck scale

    CO Lousto and N Sánchez. The ultrarelativistic limit of the Kerr-Newman geometry and particle scattering at the Planck scale. Physics Letters B , 232(4):462–466, 1989

    1989

  25. [32]

    The curved shock wave space-tim e of ultra- relativistic charged particles and their scattering

    CO Lousto and N Sánchez. The curved shock wave space-tim e of ultra- relativistic charged particles and their scattering. International Journal of Modern Physics A , 5(05):915–938, 1990

    1990

  26. [33]

    Solving the ini tial value problem of two black holes

    Pedro Marronetti and Richard A Matzner. Solving the ini tial value problem of two black holes. Physical Review Letters , 85(26):5500, 2000

    2000

  27. [34]

    Geometry of general hyp ersur- faces in spacetime: junction conditions

    Marc Mars and Jose MM Senovilla. Geometry of general hyp ersur- faces in spacetime: junction conditions. Classical and Quantum Gravity , 10(9):1865, 1993

    1993

  28. [35]

    I nitial data and coordinates for multiple black hole systems

    Richard A Matzner, Mijan F Huq, and Deirdre Shoemaker. I nitial data and coordinates for multiple black hole systems. Physical Review D , 59(2):024015, 1998

    1998

  29. [36]

    Kerr -Schild-type initial data for black holes with angular momenta

    Claudia Moreno, Darío Núñez, and Olivier Sarbach. Kerr -Schild-type initial data for black holes with angular momenta. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 19(23):6059, 2002

    2002

  30. [37]

    Multiplication of distributions and applications to partial differential equations

    Michael Oberguggenberger. Multiplication of distributions and applications to partial differential equations . Number 259. Longman Scientific & Tech- nical, 1992

    1992

  31. [38]

    General relativity, papers in honour of jl sy nge

    R Penrose. General relativity, papers in honour of jl sy nge. Clarendon, Oxford, page 101, 1972

    1972

  32. [39]

    A simple method of constructing binary bla ck hole initial data

    István Rácz. A simple method of constructing binary bla ck hole initial data. Astronomy Reports, 62(12):953–958, 2018

    2018

  33. [40]

    Junction conditions in quadratic gravity: thin shells and double layers

    Borja Reina, José MM Senovilla, and Raül Vera. Junction conditions in quadratic gravity: thin shells and double layers. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 33(10):105008, 2016

    2016

  34. [41]

    Uniqueness of the Kerr black hole

    David C Robinson. Uniqueness of the Kerr black hole. Physical Review Letters, 34(14):905, 1975. 35

    1975

  35. [42]

    Classification of black holes with electro magnetic fields

    DC Robinson. Classification of black holes with electro magnetic fields. Physical Review D , 10(2):458, 1974

    1974

  36. [43]

    Double layers in gravity theories

    José MM Senovilla. Double layers in gravity theories. I n Journal of Physics: Conference Series, volume 600, page 012004. IOP Publishing, 2015

    2015

  37. [44]

    Equations for general shells

    José MM Senovilla. Equations for general shells. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2018(11):134, 2018

    2018

  38. [45]

    On gravitational shock waves in c urved spacetimes

    Konstadinos Sfetsos. On gravitational shock waves in c urved spacetimes. Nuclear Physics B , 436(3):721–745, 1995

    1995

  39. [46]

    Space-times with distribution valued curvatu re tensors

    AH Taub. Space-times with distribution valued curvatu re tensors. Journal of Mathematical Physics , 21(6):1423–1431, 1980

    1980

  40. [48]

    Experimental black-hole evapor ation? Physical Review Letters, 46(21):1351, 1981

    William George Unruh. Experimental black-hole evapor ation? Physical Review Letters, 46(21):1351, 1981

    1981

  41. [49]

    Acoustic geometr y for general relativistic barotropic irrotational fluid flow

    Matt Visser and Carmen Molina-París. Acoustic geometr y for general relativistic barotropic irrotational fluid flow. New Journal of Physics , 12(9):095014, 2010. 36

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.