Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Investigating the Role of Cultural Values in Adopting Large Language Models for Software Engineering

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.05055 v1 pith:VWOFC2WZ submitted 2024-09-08 cs.SE cs.ET

classification cs.SEcs.ET
keywords culturalsoftwaredevelopmentllmsvaluesadoptionperformanceprocess
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As a socio-technical activity, software development involves the close interconnection of people and technology. The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into this process exemplifies the socio-technical nature of software development. Although LLMs influence the development process, software development remains fundamentally human-centric, necessitating an investigation of the human factors in this adoption. Thus, with this study we explore the factors influencing the adoption of LLMs in software development, focusing on the role of professionals' cultural values. Guided by the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2) and Hofstede's cultural dimensions, we hypothesized that cultural values moderate the relationships within the UTAUT2 framework. Using Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modelling and data from 188 software engineers, we found that habit and performance expectancy are the primary drivers of LLM adoption, while cultural values do not significantly moderate this process. These findings suggest that, by highlighting how LLMs can boost performance and efficiency, organizations can encourage their use, no matter the cultural differences. Practical steps include offering training programs to demonstrate LLM benefits, creating a supportive environment for regular use, and continuously tracking and sharing performance improvements from using LLMs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. From Expectation to Habit: Why Do Software Practitioners Adopt Fairness Toolkits?

    cs.SE 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A UTAUT2-based survey of 181 practitioners finds performance expectancy and habit drive fairness toolkit adoption.

Pith tools