Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 58 references

Coordinate Space Modification of Fock's Theory-Harmonic Tensors in the Quantum Coulomb Problem

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that in a 4D coordinate space the hydrogen Schrödinger equation becomes the 4D Laplace equation, and that physical eigenfunctions are generated by differentiating harmonic 4D polynomials and setting the extra coordinate…

desk verdict An elegant coordinate-space repackaging of Fock's SO(4) treatment of hydrogen, but the central inverse-Fourier step in Section VI.D is asserted rather than proved; worth refereeing, not accepting as-is. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.00010 v1 pith:VWYYCWQE submitted 2024-12-13 quant-ph physics.atom-ph

Sergei P. Efimov This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phphysics.atom-ph PACS 02.30.Em03.65.Db03.65.Ge
keywords Fock'stheoryquantumCoulombproblemharmonicpolynomialstensorsSO(4)symmetryFouriertransformladderoperatorsStarkeffect
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Fock showed that the hydrogen atom's hidden SO(4) symmetry becomes manifest when momentum space is wrapped onto a 3-sphere. This paper tries to establish that the same symmetry can be realized in an ordinary four-dimensional coordinate space, where the Schrödinger equation becomes the 4D Laplace equation and the eigenfunctions are harmonic polynomials. The return to physical space is claimed to be algebraic: differentiate the harmonic polynomial with respect to the extra coordinate, multiply by $e^{-r}$, and then set that coordinate to $t=-ir$. If this recipe is correct, hydrogen wavefunctions and derived quantities such as Stark shifts, the Schwinger resolvent, and ladder operators can be computed without integrals or stereographic projection. The paper also claims a new special-function identity connecting Laguerre polynomials to derivatives of Gegenbauer polynomials.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing objects are harmonic 4D polynomials, written invariantly as traceless symmetric tensors whose contraction over any two indices vanishes. The Gegenbauer polynomial $C_k^{l+1}(i t/R)$ carries the radial structure, and the operator $\partial_t^{n-1}$ converts the polynomial degree into the principal quantum number $n$. The substitution $t=-ir$ after differentiation projects the 4D harmonic polynomial onto physical space; the paper interprets it as passing from the 4D Laplace equation to a wave equation with speed $2Ze/n$. A four-dimensional raising operator $\hat D$ steps between multipole ranks and underlies the ladder-operator results, while trace-reduction formulas make perturbation-theory contractions algebraic.

What would settle it

Take a state beyond the paper's worked examples, such as $n=3$, $l=0$, and evaluate the right-hand side of Eq. (66) with and without the delta-function contributions generated by the polynomial numerator. If the two results differ from the standard hydrogen $3s$ wavefunction, the claimed algebraic map is incomplete; if the truncated expression reproduces it, the truncation rule is supported at least for that case.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's claim is that Fock's momentum-space construction can be replaced by a coordinate-space construction. Starting from solid 4D spherical functions, that is, harmonic polynomials of degree $n-1$, it performs a 4D Fourier transform, discards the delta-function terms coming from the polynomial numerator, and closes the integration contour to obtain $\Psi_{nl}(\mathbf{x})\propto e^{-r}\,\partial_t^{n-1}\left[Y_l(\mathbf{x}) C_k^{l+1}(i t/R) R^{n-1}\right]\big|_{t=-ir}$. The squared 4D radius $R^2=r^2-t^2$ is set to zero only after differentiation. In this picture the SO(4) symmetry lives in the harmonic tensor itself, and the substitution $t=-ir$ is what hides the symmetry in the familiar coordinate wavefunctions. The same machinery yields a differential equation in momentum space, a compact derivation of the quadratic Stark effect, an electrostatic rederivation of Fock's integral equation, and the Schwinger resolvent as a Gegenbauer-polynomial series.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the delta-function pieces produced by the polynomial part of the inverse Fourier transform can be thrown away; the paper verifies the resulting recipe on examples but supplies no general proof that this discarding is legitimate.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Hydrogen eigenfunctions can be constructed by differentiating harmonic 4D polynomials: no Fourier integrals or spherical-function expansions are needed in the final step.
  • The SO(4) symmetry of the Coulomb problem is realized in a coordinate space whose extra coordinate acts as complex time; after $t=-ir$ the symmetry is concealed in standard solutions.
  • The quadratic Stark effect for states without a linear effect follows from tensor contractions and Euler's theorem, yielding the dipole-moment formula without parabolic-coordinate separation.
  • Fock's integral equation can be rederived from electrostatic boundary conditions on spheres in 3D and 4D, and the Schwinger resolvent is obtained as a series in Gegenbauer polynomials.
  • The polynomial-correspondence identity in Appendix D connects Laguerre polynomials to derivatives of Gegenbauer polynomials, a relation the paper says is absent from standard special-function theory.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the delta-function truncation can be made rigorous, the construction would give a fully algebraic derivation of the hydrogen spectrum and a compact route to matrix elements.
  • The same pattern, inversion plus Fourier transform instead of stereographic projection, might extend to other quantum systems whose hidden symmetry is known in momentum space, such as Dirac hydrogen or dynamical-symmetry problems.
  • The Appendix D identity could be tested numerically for arbitrary $n,l,k$; if it holds beyond the examples checked, it is an independent generating-function result.
  • The wave-equation interpretation of $t=-ir$ hints at a time-dependent formulation of Coulomb scattering, though the paper does not develop that direction.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents a coordinate-space reformulation of Fock's momentum-space treatment of the hydrogen atom. The author extends the Fock eigenfunctions harmonically into a fourth dimension, applies an inverse 4D Fourier transform, and claims that the Schrödinger equation becomes the 4D Laplace equation in a coordinate space with a fictitious time-like coordinate. The central result is an algebraic recipe, Eqs. (65)–(66), that generates hydrogen eigenfunctions from derivatives of harmonic 4D polynomials after the substitution τ = -ir. The paper also derives a differential equation in momentum space, a compact quadratic Stark-effect calculation, the Schwinger resolvent, and vector ladder operators using harmonic-tensor methods.

Significance. If the central map is valid, the paper gives a genuinely coordinate-space realization of Fock's SO(4) symmetry and an efficient algebraic route to hydrogen wavefunctions, with no fitted parameters. The tensor identities in Sec. III and the example checks in Sec. VI and Appendix D are explicit and checkable, and the Stark formula provides a concrete quantitative prediction. The main obstacle is not circularity: the derivation does not fit parameters to the known eigenfunctions. The obstruction is the unproved distributional truncation in Sec. VI.D, which supports the principal claim. The result is therefore currently conditional rather than established.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. VI.D, Eqs. (63)–(66)] The step "the result is a combination of delta functions, which must be discarded" is the central load-bearing step of the paper, and it is asserted rather than proved. The integrand in Eq. (64) has a polynomial numerator, so the Fourier transform is a tempered distribution; for a Gegenbauer numerator of degree k ≥ 2 the integral over τ is not absolutely convergent, and the large-semicircle contribution in the lower half-plane does not vanish because the endpoint values of e^{-iτ} do not decay. A valid argument must either compute the distributional Fourier transform of P(τ)e^{-iτ}/(τ²+r²) and show that the polynomial contributions are supported at ω = -1 (with the convention of Eq. (63)) and hence do not affect the value at ω = 0, or introduce an explicit regularization and prove that the residue value is the unique physical one. Footnote 11 gestures at removing the delta terms but does not prove that the choice preserves the physical boundary condition or the Fock normalization. Until this is supplied, Eqs. (65)–(66) are not established.
  2. [Appendix D, Eqs. (D.1)–(D.10)] The verification in Appendix D applies the residue substitution and then proves a polynomial identity for the resulting Laguerre/Gegenbauer expressions. This confirms the internal consistency of the recipe for individual n, l, k but does not address the truncation step itself. In particular, it does not exclude regularizations that add local terms supported at r = 0, which would change the boundary condition of the claimed physical eigenfunction. A complete proof of Eqs. (65)–(66) must include the missing distributional lemma, not only the post-substitution polynomial identity.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. IV.C, Eq. (49)] The claimed agreement between Eq. (49) and Eq. (43) for m = n-1 should be displayed explicitly. If the numerator in Eq. (49) is (n+1)(4n+5), the two expressions coincide; if it is (n-1)(4n+5), they do not. The current typography is ambiguous, and a one-line substitution check would remove the ambiguity.
  2. [Sec. VI.D, Eq. (63)] Eq. (63) defines an inverse Fourier transform in ω, but the following paragraph evaluates the integral at ω = 0 without stating that this is the physical zero-frequency component. This convention should be stated explicitly, especially because the distributional support of the discarded terms depends on the Fourier convention.
  3. [Throughout] The manuscript contains numerous transcription-level errors and inconsistent notation, for example "Decomcoordinate" in Sec. III.E, "Acknoledgements" in the contents, and "Feinman" in Ref. [58]. These do not affect the mathematics but make the paper harder to referee and use.
  4. [Sec. VI.C] The constants in Eqs. (60)–(66) are described as "floating" and the normalization is left unspecified. Since Eqs. (65)–(66) are intended as a calculational recipe, a fixed normalization convention (or an explicit statement that all formulas are up to an n,l-dependent constant) should be stated before the main formula.
  5. [Sec. X] The statement that the substitution τ = -it means a transition to a wave equation with speed 2Ze/n is made without derivation; a one-line derivation from the 4D Laplace equation would help the reader assess this physical interpretation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the coordinate-space map is derived from Fock's external theory and verified by explicit polynomial identities; self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central claim, Eqs. (65)-(66), is not circular. It starts from Fock's established momentum-space integral equation and an external 4D Fourier-transform framework, then constructs coordinate-space expressions that are checked in Appendix D against the standard Laguerre/Gegenbauer representation of hydrogen eigenfunctions. No parameter is fitted to the target result and the final identity is verified explicitly, not assumed. The author's self-citations, mainly [26,27] for harmonic-tensor notation and a ladder operator, are used for convenience; the needed tensor formulas are re-derived in Section III via the Laplace operator, and the ladder operator of Section VIII is not essential to the main eigenfunction map. The only notable weakness is the distributional step in Section VI.D, where delta-function contributions are discarded after contour integration; this is a rigor concern about an unproved regularization, not a reduction of the claimed result to its own input. The paper is therefore substantially self-contained against external benchmarks, with only minor non-load-bearing self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted parameters and no physical degrees of freedom beyond the standard Coulomb problem. Its results rest on standard special-function theory (Gegenbauer and Laguerre polynomials), on Fock's momentum-space framework, and, critically, on an ad hoc assumption that delta-function terms from the inverse 4D Fourier transform can be discarded. The fictitious fourth coordinate is a mathematical device without independent evidence.

assumptions (4)
  • ad hoc to paper The inverse 4D Fourier transform is applied to eigenfunctions extended harmonically to 4D momentum space, and the resulting delta-function terms are discarded.
    Section VI.C-D: the transformation from harmonic 4D polynomials to physical eigenfunctions depends on this unproved step; the text states 'The result is a combination of delta functions, which must be discarded.'
  • domain assumption The Fock momentum-space eigenfunctions and the completeness of 4D solid spherical functions are taken as given.
    Section II and VII rely on Fock's integral equation and the completeness of spherical harmonics on S^3; the paper does not re-derive these.
  • domain assumption The commutation and swapping of operators such as the angular-momentum modulus operator with the Laplacian in Section V is valid on the relevant function space.
    Section V.A, around Eqs. (51)-(52), swaps operators without proving the absence of boundary terms; this underlies the claimed differential equation in momentum space.
  • standard math Standard properties of Gegenbauer polynomials (kernel decomposition, orthogonality, addition theorem) are used without proof.
    Section IX and Appendix E rely on standard identities from special-function theory.
invented entities (1)
  • Fictitious time-like coordinate τ (or t)
    purpose: Embeds the 3D Coulomb problem in a 4D space where the Schrödinger equation is a 4D Laplace equation; the physical space is recovered by the substitution τ = -ir or t = r.
    The coordinate has no observable meaning and is eliminated at the end; it is a mathematical device, not a physical dimension.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Coordinate Space Modification of Fock's Theory-Harmonic Tensors in the Quantum Coulomb Problem." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VWYYCWQE

@misc{pith2026250100010,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Coordinate Space Modification of Fock's Theory-Harmonic Tensors in the Quantum Coulomb Problem},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VWYYCWQE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.00010}
}
read the original abstract

We consider Fock's fundamental theory of the hydrogen atom in momentum space which allows a realization of the previously predicted rotation group of a three-dimensional (3D) sphere in four-dimensional (4D) space. We then modify Fock's theory and abandon the momentum space description. To transform and simplify the theory, we use invariant tensor methods of electrostatics in 3D and 4D spaces. We find a coordinate 4D space where the Schrodinger equation becomes the 4D Laplace equation. The transition from harmonic 4D polynomials to original 3D physical space is algebraic and involves derivatives with respect to a coordinate that is interpreted as time. We obtain a differential equation for eigenfunctions in the momentum space and find its solutions. A concise calculation of the quadratic Stark effect is given. The Schwinger resolvent is derived by the method of harmonic polynomials. Vector ladder operators are also considered.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    D., Lifshitz E

    Landau L. D., Lifshitz E. M., Quantum Mechanics: Nonrelativistic Theory, Pergamon Press Inc., New York 10523, U.S.A. (1958), ISBN 0-08-020940-8

    work page 1958

  2. [2]

    A., Salpeter E

    Bethe H. A., Salpeter E. E., Quantum mechanics of one and two-electron atoms, Springer, Berlin (1957), ISBN 978-3-662-12869-5, https://doi/10.1007/078-3-662- 12869-3 36

    work page doi:10.1007/078-3-662- 1957

  3. [3]

    I., Zel’dovich

    Baz A. I., Zel’dovich. I. B., Perelomov A. M., Scattering, reactions and decays in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, World Scientific Publishing Co.Ptl.Ltd., River Edge, NY 07661(1998), ISBN 981-02-3550-X

    work page 1998

  4. [4]

    L., Dalibard J., The Quantum Mechanics Solver, Springer- Verlag, Berlin,New-York, Heidelberg (2000)

    Basdevant J. L., Dalibard J., The Quantum Mechanics Solver, Springer- Verlag, Berlin,New-York, Heidelberg (2000)

    work page 2000

  5. [5]

    P., To the question of link of accidental degeneracy with hidden symmetry of physical system

    Alliluev S. P., To the question of link of accidental degeneracy with hidden symmetry of physical system. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., 33 (1957) 200

    work page 1957

  6. [6]

    Perelomov A. M.,. Popov V. S, Terent’ev M.V., Ionization of atoms in alternating electric field, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., 50 (1966) 179, https://e_023_05_0924.pdf

    work page 1966

  7. [7]

    Bander M., Itzykson C., Group theory and the hydrogen atom, Rev. Mod. Phys., 38(2) 330 (1966), https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.38.330

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.38.330 1966

  8. [8]

    Hulthén L., Über die quantenmechanische Herleitung der Balmerterme, Zs. f. Phys., 86 (1-2), 21 (1933). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF013401795

    work page doi:10.1007/bf013401795 1933

Show all 58 references
  1. [9]

    Fock V. A. , Wasserstoffatom und Nicht-euklidische Geometrie, Bulletin de l'Académie des Sciences de l'URSS. Classe des sciences mathématiques et na , 2, 169 (1935)

    1935

  2. [10]

    A., Zȕr Theorie des Wasserstoffatoms, Zs

    Fock V. A., Zȕr Theorie des Wasserstoffatoms, Zs. f. Phys 98 145 (1935), https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01336904

    1935 doi

  3. [11]

    Fock V. A., V. A. Fock- Selected Works: Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Field Theory CRC Press (2004) https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203643204

    2004 doi

  4. [12]

    Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stereographic_projection

    Stereographic projection. Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stereographic_projection

  5. [13]

    Casselman Bil, Stereographic Projection, AMS:Feature column, (2014), www.ams.org/publiccourreach/...-2014-02-2015

    2014

  6. [14]

    D., Memoir

    Poisson S. D., Memoir. l'Acad. Sci. Paris, 5 , 247 (1821 - 1822)

  7. [15]

    Whittaker E. T. A., History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity, Vol. 1, The Classical Theories, T.Nelson, London,1951

    1951

  8. [16]

    G., Treatise on Natural Philosophy, Pt

    Thomson W., Tait P. G., Treatise on Natural Philosophy, Pt. 2 ,The Univ. Press, Cambridge ( 1912)

    1912

  9. [17]

    A., Electromagnetic Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York (1941)

    Stratton J. A., Electromagnetic Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York (1941)

    1941

  10. [18]

    C., A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, Vol.2, Oxford Univ.Press, London (1892)

    Maxwell J. C., A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, Vol.2, Oxford Univ.Press, London (1892)

  11. [19]

    W., The Theory of Spherical and Ellipsoidal Harmonics, Ch.4 ,The Univ

    Hobson E. W., The Theory of Spherical and Ellipsoidal Harmonics, Ch.4 ,The Univ. Press, Cambridge (1931

    1931

  12. [20]

    E., Multipole Fields, John Wiley&Sons, Inc., New York (1955)

    Rose M. E., Multipole Fields, John Wiley&Sons, Inc., New York (1955)

    1955

  13. [21]

    E., De Lange O.L., Multipole Theory in Electromagnetism: Classical, Quantum and Symmetry Aspects, with applications , Clarendon Press, Oxford ( 2005)

    Raab R. E., De Lange O.L., Multipole Theory in Electromagnetism: Classical, Quantum and Symmetry Aspects, with applications , Clarendon Press, Oxford ( 2005)

    2005

  14. [22]

    D., Classical Electrodynamics,3rd ed.,Wiley, New York (1999)

    Jackson J. D., Classical Electrodynamics,3rd ed.,Wiley, New York (1999)

    1999

  15. [23]

    D., Lifshitz E.M., The Classical Theory of Fields, Pergamon Press, Oxford (1975)

    Landau L. D., Lifshitz E.M., The Classical Theory of Fields, Pergamon Press, Oxford (1975)

    1975

  16. [24]

    E., Fundamentals of the Theory of Electricity, Mir Publ., Moscow (1979)

    Tamm I. E., Fundamentals of the Theory of Electricity, Mir Publ., Moscow (1979). 37

    1979

  17. [25]

    P., Muratov R

    Efimov S. P., Muratov R. Z., Scattering Theory Interference Theorems in Vector Problems of Low-frequency Diffraction , Sov. Phys. Dokl. 23 (8) (1978) 558, https://mi.mathnet.ru/eng/dan/v241/i6/pl1315

    1978

  18. [26]

    P., Transition operator between multipole states and their tensor structure, Theor

    Efimov S. P., Transition operator between multipole states and their tensor structure, Theor. Math. Phys., 39(2) (1979) 425, https://mi.mathnet.ru/tmf2665

    1979

  19. [27]

    Z., Multipoles and Ellipsoid Fields, Publishing House- MISiS, Moscow (2015), ISBN 978-5-600-01057-4

    Muratov R. Z., Multipoles and Ellipsoid Fields, Publishing House- MISiS, Moscow (2015), ISBN 978-5-600-01057-4

    2015

  20. [28]

    P., Muratov R

    Efimov S. P., Muratov R. Z., Theory of multipole representation of the potentials of an ellipsoid.Tensor potentials, Sov. Astron., 67 (2) (1990) 152, Am. Inst. Phys., ISSN: 0038-5301, https://adsabs/harvard.edu/pdf/1990SvA...34...152E

    1990

  21. [29]

    P., Muratov R

    Efimov S. P., Muratov R. Z., Theory of multipole representation of the potentials of an ellipsoid. Moments, Sov. Astron., 67(2) (1990) 157, Am. Inst. Phys., ISSN: 0038-5301, https://adsabs/harvard.edu/pdf/1990SvA...34...157E

    1990

  22. [30]

    Z., Some useful correspondences in classical magnetostatics and multipole representations of the magnetic potential of an ellipsoid, Phys

    Muratov R. Z., Some useful correspondences in classical magnetostatics and multipole representations of the magnetic potential of an ellipsoid, Phys. Usp., 55(9), 919 (2012), https://doi.org/10.3367/UFNr.0182.201209d.0987

    2012

  23. [31]

    V., Elements of Theoretical Physics, «Nauka», Moscow (1977)

    Medvedev B. V., Elements of Theoretical Physics, «Nauka», Moscow (1977)

    1977

  24. [32]

    U., Vilenkin N

    Klimuk A. U., Vilenkin N. Y., Representation of Lie Groups and Special Functions, American Mathematical Society (1978), ISBN 0821886526, 9780821886526

    1978

  25. [33]

    P., Compact Lie groups and their applications, Translations of Mathematical Monographs (1973)

    Gelobenko D. P., Compact Lie groups and their applications, Translations of Mathematical Monographs (1973)

    1973

  26. [34]

    Z., Eine Verallgemeinerun der Quantenbedingungen fȕr Zwecke der Wellenmechanik, Z

    Wentzel G. Z., Eine Verallgemeinerun der Quantenbedingungen fȕr Zwecke der Wellenmechanik, Z. Phys, 38 (1926) 518, https://www.link.springer.com

    1926

  27. [35]

    Phys, 38 (1926) 635, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01397605

    Waller I., Der Starkeffect zweiter Ordnung bei Wasserstoff und die Rydberg correction der Spectra von He und Li+, Z. Phys, 38 (1926) 635, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01397605

    1926 doi

  28. [36]

    S., The Stark effect from the point of view of Schrȍdinger’s quantum theory, Phys

    Epstein P. S., The Stark effect from the point of view of Schrȍdinger’s quantum theory, Phys. Rev., 28 (1926) 695, https://caltech.edu/EPSpr26.pdf

    1926

  29. [37]

    A., Second order perturbation theory for hydrogen atom in crossed electrical and magnetic fields, Zh

    Solov’ev E. A., Second order perturbation theory for hydrogen atom in crossed electrical and magnetic fields, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., 85(1) (1983) 109

    1983

  30. [38]

    A, 57(2) (1998) 1149, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.57.1149

    Main J., Schwacke M.and Wunner G., Hydrogen atom in combined electric and magnetic fields with arbitrary mutual orientations, Phys.Rev. A, 57(2) (1998) 1149, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.57.1149

    1998 doi

  31. [39]

    Rev., 34 (1929) 109, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev34.109

    Podolski B., Pauling L., The momentum distribution in hydrogen-like atoms , Phys. Rev., 34 (1929) 109, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev34.109

    1929 doi

  32. [40]

    E., Quantum Mechanics: A Modern Development, World Scientific Publishing, Singapur (2014)

    Ballentine L. E., Quantum Mechanics: A Modern Development, World Scientific Publishing, Singapur (2014). 38

    2014

  33. [41]

    I , Springer-Verlag, Berlin- Heidelberg- NewYork, ( 1971) p.215, e-ISBN-13:978-3-642-61995-3, https://doi:10.1007/978-3-642- 61995-3

    Flȕgge S., Practical Quantum Mechanics, Vol. I , Springer-Verlag, Berlin- Heidelberg- NewYork, ( 1971) p.215, e-ISBN-13:978-3-642-61995-3, https://doi:10.1007/978-3-642- 61995-3

    1971 doi

  34. [42]

    R., Quantum mechanics in momentum space

    Holstein B. R., Quantum mechanics in momentum space. The Coulomb system. Am. J. of Phys., 63(8) (1995) 710, https://doi.org/10.mg/1.1784

    1995

  35. [43]

    R., Angular momentum in quantum mechanic, University Press, Princeton (1996).ISBN: 0691025894

    Edmonds A. R., Angular momentum in quantum mechanic, University Press, Princeton (1996).ISBN: 0691025894

    1996

  36. [44]

    J., Quantum optics and electronics, Gordon and Beach, New York (1965)

    Glauber R. J., Quantum optics and electronics, Gordon and Beach, New York (1965)

    1965

  37. [45]

    J., Coherent and incoherent states of the radiation fields, Phys

    Glauber R. J., Coherent and incoherent states of the radiation fields, Phys. Rev., 131(6) (1963) 2766, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.131.2766

    1963 doi

  38. [46]

    J., The quantum theory of optical coherence, Phys

    Glauber R. J., The quantum theory of optical coherence, Phys. Rev., 130(6) (1963) 2529, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.130.2529

    1963 doi

  39. [47]

    R., Coherent states for the hydrogen atom, J

    Klauder J. R., Coherent states for the hydrogen atom, J. of Phys. A., Math. Gen., 29 (12) (1996) L293, https://iopscience.iop.org

    1996

  40. [48]

    R., Coherent States

    Klauder J. R., Coherent States. Applications in Physics and Mathematical Physics (World Scientific, 1985)

    1985

  41. [49]

    M., Generalized Coherent States and their Applications, Springer-Verlag, (2012)

    Perelomov A. M., Generalized Coherent States and their Applications, Springer-Verlag, (2012)

    2012

  42. [50]

    , Coulomb Green’s Function, J

    Schwinger J. , Coulomb Green’s Function, J. Math. Phys. 5(11) (1964) 1606, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1931195

    1964 doi

  43. [51]

    Applications in Quantum Theory, Kluwer, Dordrecht ( 1989)

    Avery J., Hyperspherical Harmonics. Applications in Quantum Theory, Kluwer, Dordrecht ( 1989)

    1989

  44. [52]

    D., On the momentum representation of hydrogenic wave functions, Am

    Hey J. D., On the momentum representation of hydrogenic wave functions, Am. J. Phys. 61(1) (1993) 28, https://doi.org/10.1119/1.17405

    1993 doi

  45. [53]

    M., Multipole expansions and Fock symmetry of the hydrogen atom, J

    Meremianin A.V., Rost J. M., Multipole expansions and Fock symmetry of the hydrogen atom, J. Phys. A, 39(40) (2006) 12427, https://arXiv:math- ph/0606062v1.pdf

    2006

  46. [54]

    J., The spherical tensor gradient operator, Collect

    Weniger E. J., The spherical tensor gradient operator, Collect. Chech. Chem. Commun., 70(8) (2005) 1225, https://arXiv:math-ph/0505018v1.pdf

    2005 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Axler S., Bourdon P., Ramey W., Harmonic function theory, Springer, New York (1994)

    1994

  48. [56]

    2044, Lecture Notes in Mathematics,Springer Berlin Heidelberg, https://doi.org/10.1007/97/B-3-642-25983-8, ISBN 978-3-642-25983-8, (2012)

    Atkinson K., Han W., Spherical harmonics and approximations on the unit sphere: an introduction, Vol. 2044, Lecture Notes in Mathematics,Springer Berlin Heidelberg, https://doi.org/10.1007/97/B-3-642-25983-8, ISBN 978-3-642-25983-8, (2012)

    2012 doi

  49. [57]

    Unsȍld t A., Über die Theorie der Born-Landéschen Gitter Kräfte, Die Natȕrwissenshaften, 15 (33) (1927) 681, https://doi:10.1007/BF01506276

    1927 doi

  50. [58]

    P., The theory of fundamental processes, W

    Feinman R. P., The theory of fundamental processes, W. A. Benjamin INC, New York (1961)

    1961

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.