Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 7 minor 46 references

Spectral analysis of $q$-deformed unitary ensembles with the Al-Salam--Carlitz weight

T0 review · 4 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read For q-deformed random unitary ensembles with the Al-Salam–Carlitz weight, the averaged spectral density converges to an explicit density that undergoes two successive phase transitions as the deformation parameter λ increases.

desk verdict Useful extension of the q-GUE program, but printed statements have fixable typos and the asymptotic proof leans on an imported lemma; worth peer review after corrections. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.18042 v1 pith:VX3F6DIR submitted 2025-07-24 math-ph math.COmath.MPmath.PR

Sung-Soo Byun , Yeong-Gwang Jung , Jaeseong Oh This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phmath.COmath.MPmath.PR MSC 60B2033D4505A3042C05
keywords q-deformedrandomunitaryensemblesAl-Salam-CarlitzpolynomialsspectralmomentslimitingdensityphasetransitionsFlajolet-Viennottheoryq-binomialcoefficientsdouble-scalinglimit
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies a q-deformed version of the classical unitary random matrix ensemble, where the joint distribution is built from the Al-Salam–Carlitz weight on the two-point q-lattice {1,q,$q^{2}$,...} ∪ {a, aq, $aq^{2}$,...} with a<0. It establishes that in the double-scaling regime q=$e^{{-\lambda/N}}$, the averaged spectral density converges to an explicit closed-form density $ρ^{{(a)}}$(x), and that this density undergoes two successive phase transitions as λ increases: the support starts with two soft edges, then loses the right soft edge as the spectrum touches the hard edge at x=1, and finally loses the left soft edge as it touches x=a. The result is driven by a new exact positive-sum formula for the spectral moments, obtained by interpreting moments as weighted Motzkin paths via Flajolet–Viennot theory and then counting generalized matchings by crossing and nesting statistics. The same limiting density is shown to describe the zeros of the Al-Salam–Carlitz polynomials under the same scaling, connecting random-matrix spectra to q-orthogonal polynomial asymptotics.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the exact positive-sum moment identity (1.13), which expresses every spectral moment m_{N,p}^{(a)} as a finite sum over indices j, k, l of q-factorial ratios, q-binomial coefficients, powers of a and a+1, and the combinatorial quantity H(b,c), defined as the sum over chains 0≤j_1≤...≤j_c≤b of products [2j_r+r-2]_q!!/[2j_r+r-1]_q!!. This formula is obtained by applying the Flajolet–Viennot identity that turns spectral moments into weighted Motzkin paths, then bijecting those paths to generalized matchings whose crossings and nestings carry the q-weights. The moment identity matters because it reduces the large-N analysis to just three terms k=l, l+1, l+2 in each inner sum, so that the limiting density and its phase transitions follow from an imported asymptotic expansion of the q-binomial sums in Lemma 4.1.

What would settle it

Evaluate the summed q-binomial expression in Lemma 4.1 numerically for fixed l and p at several large N under q=$e^{{-\lambda/N}}$; if the remainder does not decay as O($N^{{l-2}}$) with the stated coefficients, then Theorems 1.2 and 1.3 fail at that order.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is Theorem 1.3: for fixed a<0 and q=$e^{{-\lambda/N}}$, the averaged spectral measure (1/N)$ρ_N^{{(a)}}$ converges weakly to an explicit probability density $ρ^{{(a)}}$(x) supported on (u-v,u+v) for 0<λ<log(1-a), on (u-v,1) for log(1-a)<λ<log(1-a)-log(-a), and on (a,1) for larger λ, where u=(1+a)$e^{{-\lambda}}$ and v=2√(-a(1-$e^{{-\lambda}}$)$e^{{-\lambda}}$). The density is given in closed form by (1.33) in terms of an arctangent factor plus a 1/(λ|x|) background on the hard-edge intervals; at the first transition the right soft edge disappears, and at the second the left soft edge disappears, leaving a bounded density on the full interval [a,1]. The paper also claims that the same object is the limiting zero distribution of the Al-Salam–Carlitz polynomials, obtained through potential-theoretic methods, and that the exact moment formula (1.13) encodes all of this through a finite positive-sum expression involving q-binomial coefficients and the factorial-ratio sums H(b,c).

Load-bearing premise

The entire asymptotic part rests on Lemma 4.1, imported from [12], which asserts a three-term expansion for certain q-binomial sums with explicit coefficients; if that expansion is not uniform in the summation indices l and k, the moment expansion and the density formula collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every fixed a<0, the limiting density has exactly three qualitative regimes in λ, with thresholds log(1-a) and log(1-a)-log(-a); this is a direct corollary of Theorem 1.3.
  • At a=-1 the two thresholds merge into one, λ=log 2, recovering the two-phase q-deformed GUE density of [12].
  • The same ρ^{(a)} is the limiting zero distribution of the Al-Salam–Carlitz polynomials, so eigenvalue statistics and polynomial zeros share one macroscopic law in this scaling.
  • The explicit leading moment coefficient M_{p,0} and the first correction M_{p,1} provide the density and its 1/N correction to the spectral moments.
  • In the continuum limit a=-1+r√λ, the rescaled density collapses to the shifted semicircle law, consistently matching the classical Gaussian limit of the weight.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An extension left implicit is that the same moment machinery should compute the full large-N expansion, not only the first two orders, once Lemma 4.1 is replaced by a complete asymptotic series; the paper only needs the first three terms.
  • The symmetry ρ^{(1/a)}(x)=-(1/a)ρ^{(a)}(x/a) gives a direct numerical self-check that the paper states but does not illustrate: the densities for a=-2 and a=-1/2 should be mirror images under this map.
  • A testable extension suggested by the bounded hard-edge densities is a local scaling limit near x=1 in a window whose size depends on λ; the paper does not address local fluctuations near the hard edges.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper studies a q-deformed unitary ensemble associated with the Al-Salam--Carlitz weight function with parameter a<0. The main results are: (i) an explicit positive-sum formula for the spectral moments (Theorem 1.1), obtained via Flajolet--Viennot path theory and generalized matchings; (ii) a two-term large-N expansion of the scaled moments in the double-scaling regime q=e^{-\lambda/N} (Theorem 1.2); (iii) a closed-form limiting spectral density, exhibiting two successive phase transitions as \lambda increases (Theorem 1.3); and (iv) an independent verification that the same density arises as the limiting zero distribution of the Al-Salam--Carlitz polynomials (Proposition 1.4). The combinatorial proof of the moment formula is largely self-contained, and the special cases a=-1 and the continuum limit are checked against known results. However, several displayed statements in the main theorems are not reliable as printed: Eq. (1.13) uses a reciprocal power of (a+1) that makes the formula singular at a=-1; Eq. (1.25) contains an undefined (l-1)! at l=0; and the proof of Proposition 1.4 uses an inconsistent scaling in Eq. (4.33). These issues are load-bearing for the paper's central claims and require correction.

Significance. If the displayed formulas are corrected, the paper makes a substantial contribution. It provides the first explicit spectral-moment formula for the general Al-Salam--Carlitz unitary ensemble, extending the q-deformed GUE results of [12]. The limiting density with two successive phase transitions is a new and interesting phenomenon, and the independent confirmation via the Kuijlaars--Van Assche zero-distribution theorem gives the result additional credibility. The paper also ships a detailed combinatorial proof of the moment formula, including a bijection between Motzkin paths and generalized matchings, which is a genuine strength. The main limitation is that the paper currently depends on the unproved imported Lemma 4.1 from an overlapping-author preprint, and the main theorems as displayed contain inconsistencies that make them false or undefined in special cases. These are correctable, so the underlying work appears sound in outline.

major comments (4)
  1. [Theorem 1.1, Eq. (1.13)] The displayed moment formula contains the factor (a+1)^{2k-p} in the denominator. For a=-1 and k<p/2 this is a division by zero, and the formula contradicts Eq. (3.1), which has the positive exponent p-2k, and Remark 4, which explicitly refers to the term (a+1)^{p-2k}. As printed, Theorem 1.1 is false for the special case a=-1 even though the intended correction is clear. Please replace (a+1)^{2k-p} with (a+1)^{p-2k} in (1.13) and in the analogous display in Remark 1.
  2. [Theorem 1.2, Eq. (1.25)] The expression for M_{p,1} contains the factor (p-1)!/(l-1)! inside the sum over l=0,...,floor(p/2). At l=0 this is undefined. The second term in the brackets must either be restricted to l>=1 or be given a consistent convention. As written, Theorem 1.2 is not a well-defined mathematical statement, and the large-N expansion (1.23) cannot be evaluated from the displayed formula.
  3. [Section 4.1, Lemma 4.1] Lemma 4.1 is imported from the overlapping-author preprint [12, Lemma 4.3] without proof, and its remainder term O(N^{l-2}) is not shown to be uniform in l. The proof of Theorem 1.2 uses this lemma for l ranging up to floor(p/2) and combines contributions from the k=l, l+1, l+2 terms; the coefficient M_{p,1} depends on C_{l,0}, C_{l,1}, and C_{l,2}. Since p is fixed in the large-N expansion, the finite range of l mitigates the uniformity issue, but the paper should still either reproduce the proof of Lemma 4.1 in an appendix or state explicitly which uniformity assumptions are needed from [12]. This is load-bearing for the claimed N^{-1} term.
  4. [Section 4.3, Eq. (4.33)] The displayed limits are taken with q=e^{-\lambda/n}, which is not the scaling q=e^{-\lambda/N} announced in (1.21). Under the actual scaling, for n/N -> s one obtains a_n -> sqrt(-a e^{-\lambda s}(1-e^{-\lambda s})) and b_n -> (a+1)e^{-\lambda s}. As written, the proof of Proposition 1.4 does not follow from the displayed limit; the scaling in (4.33) and the surrounding text must be corrected.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Eq. (4.7)] The notation H(k-l,2p-l) should be H(k-l,2p-2k) to match the summation bounds and the subsequent use in Lemma 4.4.
  2. [Section 4.1 and Section 3.2] There are typos: 'Talyor expansion' should be 'Taylor expansion' (twice), and 'generlised' should be 'generalised'.
  3. [Remark 5, after Eq. (1.41)] The second displayed asymptotic expression repeats 'y0' where 'y1' is intended.
  4. [Eq. (4.5) and Lemma 4.1] The notation C_{l.0}, C_{l.1}, C_{l.2} uses a period where a comma is standard; this should be corrected to C_{l,0}, C_{l,1}, C_{l,2} for consistency with the text.
  5. [Eq. (4.26)] In the first case the interval is written as '\lambda \in (0, \log(1-a),' with a missing closing parenthesis; this should read '(0, \log(1-a))'.
  6. [Section 4.2, Eqs. (4.19)-(4.22)] The inequalities in (4.19)-(4.22) are written for a complex variable y; the intended meaning is that they hold for real y outside the support [a,1], or the absolute value notation should be used consistently.
  7. [Reference [40]] The third author of [40] is listed without an initial; it should read 'A. Morozov, A. Popolitov, and Sh. Shakirov'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the spectral moments are derived from a first-principles combinatorial enumeration, and the limiting density is obtained by Stieltjes inversion plus an independent potential-theoretic verification.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained rather than circular. Theorem 1.1 is proved from the Flajolet–Viennot identity (2.13) with the recurrence coefficients (3.3), followed by a bijective enumeration of generalized matchings and explicit evaluation of the statistic in Lemma 3.2; no target moment or limiting density is assumed as an input. Theorem 1.2 is obtained by substituting the closed form (1.13) into the asymptotic analysis, using Lemma 4.1, which is imported from [12, Lemma 4.3]. This lemma is a parameter-free asymptotic expansion of the q-series sum over j; it does not encode the final density and is not fitted to any subset of the paper's conclusions. Theorem 1.3 is a direct Stieltjes inversion of the leading moment coefficients Mp,0, with the resulting density verified independently in Proposition 1.4 via the external potential-theoretic theorem of Kuijlaars and Van Assche [33], after scaling the recurrence coefficients in (4.33). This gives a genuinely independent route to the same density, rather than a renaming. The only notable structural dependency is Section 4.1's Lemma 4.1, stated as 'The following is given in [12, Lemma 4.3]' with the proof not reproduced here; that is an external correctness and uniformity risk, not circularity, because the lemma's statement does not rely on the paper's own results. Special-case comparisons with [11,12] are consistency checks, not load-bearing inputs. Thus no step reduces by construction to its own inputs, and the appropriate finding is absence of circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data; the model parameters a, q, lambda and N are inputs, and the combinatorial sums H(b,c) are defined, not estimated. The proof relies on standard q-orthogonal polynomial results and on two imported theorems, one from the authors' overlapping preprint [12] and one from [33]. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math Flajolet-Viennot identity (2.13) gives spectral moments as weighted sums over Motzkin paths.
    Cited from [21,44] and used as the starting point of Section 3.
  • standard math Al-Salam-Carlitz orthogonality (2.3) and three-term recurrence (1.8) hold for a<0 and 0<q<1.
    Standard q-Askey scheme background from [32, Sec. 14.24]; defines the ensemble (1.6) and the path weights (3.3).
  • domain assumption Lemma 4.1, the asymptotic expansion of q-binomial sums, is taken from [12, Lemma 4.3] without proof here.
    This lemma is the main input for Theorem 1.2; if its error terms are not valid uniformly in l and k, the large-N expansion and the resulting density do not follow. The authors overlap with [12].
  • domain assumption Kuijlaars-Van Assche [33, Theorem 1.4] applies to the limiting recurrence coefficients (4.33) to give the averaged zero distribution (4.36).
    Used only for Proposition 1.4; requires the slowly varying recurrence-coefficient hypotheses of [33] under q=e^{-lambda/N}.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spectral analysis of $q$-deformed unitary ensembles with the Al-Salam--Carlitz weight." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VX3F6DIR

@misc{pith2026250718042,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spectral analysis of $q$-deformed unitary ensembles with the Al-Salam--Carlitz weight},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VX3F6DIR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.18042}
}
abstract

We study $q$-deformed random unitary ensembles associated with the weight function of the Al-Salam--Carlitz orthogonal polynomials, indexed by a parameter $a < 0$. In the special case $a = -1$, the model reduces to the $q$-deformed Gaussian unitary ensemble. Employing the Flajolet--Viennot theory together with the combinatorics of matchings, we derive an explicit positive-sum expression for the spectral moments. In the double-scaling regime $q = e^{-\lambda/N}$, where $N$ denotes the ensemble size and $\lambda > 0$ is fixed, we derive the first two terms in the large-$N$ expansion of the spectral moments. As a consequence, we obtain a closed-form expression for the limiting spectral density. Notably, this density exhibits two successive phase transitions as $\lambda$ increases, characterised by a reduction in the number of soft edges from two, to one, and eventually to none. Furthermore, we show that the limiting density coincides with the limiting zero distribution of the Al-Salam--Carlitz orthogonal polynomials under the same scaling.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.18042 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The plots display the density x 7→ ρ (a) (x), given by (1.33), for x ∈ [a, 1] with a = −1/3. The critical regimes correspond to the values λ = log(4/3) and λ = log 4, shown in (D) and (E) of the second row, respectively. Remark 4 (Spectral moments of the q-deformed GUE [12]: the special case a = −1). We discuss the special case a = −1 of our theorems. Due to the term (a + 1)p−2k in the second summation of (1.13), th… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Schematic diagram illustrating the dual route to the limiting spectral density ρ (a) via characteristic polynomials and Al-Salam–Carlitz orthogonal polynomials. Proposition 1.4 (Limiting zero distribution of Al-Salam–Carlitz polynomial). Let a < 0 be fixed, and let q be scaled according to (1.21). Let νN be the empirical zero distribution (1.44). As N → ∞, in the sense of integration against continuous test function… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Pictorial representation of generalised matching on [7] with 2 arcs and 1 vertical To proceed, let Mat>j a,b,c be the subset of Mata,b,c consisting of generalised matching of which the first j vertices are either isolated or openers. On the other hand, we define a Al-Salam–Carlitz history as a labeled Motzkin path where the South-East step of height k is labeled with an integer in [k]. Then we proceed to construct a… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: An Al-Salam–Carlitz history from (0, 3) to (6, 3) and its corresponding generalised matching [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Pictorial illustrations of four types of crossings Definition: Nesting A nesting of a generalised matching M is either (1) a pair of arcs (a, b) and (c, d) with a < c < d < b, or (2) a pair of an arc (a, b) and an isolated vertex c with c < a < b. The total number of n…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Pictorial illustrations of two types of nestings We now present an alternative enumeration of the left-hand side of (3.5) by counting the crossings and nestings of generalised matchings. More precisely, we define a statistic on a generalised matching M by (3.6) stat(M)…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [12]

    $q$-deformed Gaussian unitary ensemble: spectral moments and genus-type expansions

    S.-S. Byun and P. J. Forrester and J. Oh, q-deformed Gaussian unitary ensemble: spectral moments and genus-type expan- sions, arXiv:2404.03400

    work page Pith review arXiv

  2. [11]

    Byun and P

    S.-S. Byun and P. J. Forrester, On the superintegrability of the Gaussian β ensemble and its (q, t) generalisation, arXiv:2505.12927

    arXiv

  3. [1]

    Akemann, S.-S

    G. Akemann, S.-S. Byun and S. Oh, Spectral moments of complex and symplectic non-Hermitian random matrices , arXiv:2505.12271

    arXiv

  4. [2]

    Allez, J.-P

    R. Allez, J.-P. Bouchaud and A. Guionnet, Invariant beta ensembles and the Gauss-wigner crossover , Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012), 094102

    work page 2012

  5. [3]

    Arizmendi, K

    O. Arizmendi, K. Fujie, D. Perales and Y. Ueda, S-transform in finite free probability , arXiv:2408.09337

    arXiv

  6. [4]

    Asaia and H

    N. Asaia and H. Yoshida, Two parameterized deformed Poisson type operator and the combinatorial moment formula , J. Math. Anal. Appl. 543 (2025), 128888

    work page 2025

  7. [5]

    Askey, Some basic hypergeometric extensions of integrals of Selberg and Andrews, SIAM J

    R. Askey, Some basic hypergeometric extensions of integrals of Selberg and Andrews, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 11 (1980) 938–951

    work page 1980

  8. [6]

    Assiotis, B

    T. Assiotis, B. Bedert, M. Gunes and A. Soor, Moments of generalized Cauchy random matrices and continuous-Hahn polynomials, Nonlinearity, 34 (2021), 4923–4943

    work page 2021

Show all 46 references
  1. [7]

    T. H. Baker and P. J. Forrester, Multivariable Al-Salam & Carlitz polynomials associated with the type A q-Dunkl kernel , Math. Nachr. 212 (2000), 5–35

    2000

  2. [8]

    W. Bryc, A. Kuznetsov and J. Weso lowski, Limits of random Motzkin paths with KPZ related asymptotics , Int. Math. Res. Not. 2025 (2025), 1-33

    2025

  3. [9]

    Byun, Harer-Zagier type recursion formula for the elliptic GinOE , Bull

    S.-S. Byun, Harer-Zagier type recursion formula for the elliptic GinOE , Bull. Sci. Math. 197 (2024), 103526

    2024

  4. [10]

    Byun and P

    S.-S. Byun and P. J. Forrester, Spectral moments of the real Ginibre ensemble , Ramanujan J. 64 (2024), 1497–1519

    2024

  5. [13]

    Cohen, Moments of discrete classical q-orthogonal polynomial ensembles , arXiv:2112.02064

    P. Cohen, Moments of discrete classical q-orthogonal polynomial ensembles , arXiv:2112.02064

    arXiv

  6. [14]

    Cohen, F

    P. Cohen, F. D. Cunden and N. O’Connell, Moments of discrete orthogonal polynomial ensembles , Electron. J. Probab. 25 (2020), Paper No. 72, 19 pp

    2020

  7. [15]

    Corteel, J

    S. Corteel, J. S. Kim and D. Stanton, Moments of orthogonal polynomials and combinatorics , Recent trends in combinatorics, 545–578, IMA Vol. Math. Appl., 159, Springer, 2016

    2016

  8. [16]

    Cuenca and M

    C. Cuenca and M. Do lega, Discrete N -particle systems at high temperature through Jack generating functions , arXiv:2502.13098

  9. [17]

    F. D. Cunden, A. Dahlqvist and N. O’Connell, Integer moments of complex Wishart matrices and Hurwitz numbers , Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e Comb. Phys. Interact.8 (2021), 243–268

    2021

  10. [18]

    F. D. Cunden, F. Mezzadri, N. O’Connell and N. Simm, Moments of random matrices and hypergeometric orthogonal polynomials, Comm. Math. Phys. 369 (2019), 1091–1145

    2019

  11. [19]

    F. D. Cunden, F. Mezzadri, N. Simm and P. Vivo, Large-N expansion for the time-delay matrix of ballistic chaotic cavities , J. Math. Phys. 57 (2016), 111901

    2016

  12. [20]

    Deift and K

    P. Deift and K. T.-R. McLaughlin, A continuum limit of the Toda lattice , Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 131 (1998)

    1998

  13. [21]

    Flajolet, Combinatorial aspects of continued fractions , Discrete Math

    P. Flajolet, Combinatorial aspects of continued fractions , Discrete Math. 32 (1980), 125–161

    1980

  14. [22]

    P. J. Forrester, Log-gases and random matrices , Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2010

    2010

  15. [23]

    P. J. Forrester, Global and local scaling limits for the β = 2 Stieltjes-Wigert random matrix ensemble , Random Matrices Theory Appl. 11 (2022), 2250020

    2022

  16. [24]

    P. J. Forrester, S.-H. Li, B.-J. Shen and G.-F. Yu, q-Pearson pair and moments in q-deformed ensembles, Ramanujan J. 60 (2023), 195–235

    2023

  17. [25]

    Gisonni, T

    M. Gisonni, T. Grava and G. Ruzza, Jacobi ensemble, Hurwitz numbers and Wilson polynomials , Lett. Math. Phys. 111 (2021), no. 3, Paper No. 67, 38 pp

    2021

  18. [26]

    Haagerup and S

    U. Haagerup and S. Thorbjørnsen, Random matrices with complex Gaussian entries , Expo. Math. 21 (2003), 293–337

    2003

  19. [27]

    Harer and D

    J. Harer and D. Zagier, The Euler characteristic of the moduli space of curves , Invent. Math. 85 (1986), 457–485

    1986

  20. [28]

    M. E. H. Ismail, D. Stanton and G. Viennot, The combinatorics of q-Hermite polynomials and the Askey-Wilson integral , European J. Combin. 8 (1987), 379–392

    1987

  21. [29]

    Jalowy, Z

    J. Jalowy, Z. Kabluchko and A. Marynych, Zeros and exponential profiles of polynomials I: Limit distributions, finite free convolutions and repeated differentiation, arXiv:2504.11593

    arXiv

  22. [30]

    S. V. Kerov, Rooks on Ferrers boards and matrix integrals , J Math Sci 96 (1999), 3531–3536

    1999

  23. [31]

    Kim, On combinatorics of Al-Salam Carlitz polynomials , European J

    D. Kim, On combinatorics of Al-Salam Carlitz polynomials , European J. Combin. 18 (1997), 295–302

    1997

  24. [32]

    Koekoek, P

    R. Koekoek, P. A. Lesky and R. F. Swarttouw, Hypergeometric Orthogonal Polynomials and Their q-Analogues , Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2010

    2010

  25. [33]

    A. B. J. Kuijlaars and W. Van Assche, The asymptotic zero distribution of orthogonal polynomials with varying recurrence coefficients, J. Approx. Theory. 99 (1999), 167–197

    1999

  26. [34]

    Ledoux, Differential operators and spectral distributions of invariant ensembles from the classical orthogonal polynomials: the discrete case , Electron

    M. Ledoux, Differential operators and spectral distributions of invariant ensembles from the classical orthogonal polynomials: the discrete case , Electron. J. Probab. 10 (2005), 1116–1146

    2005

  27. [35]

    Ledoux, A recursion formula for the moments of the Gaussian orthogonal ensemble , Ann

    M. Ledoux, A recursion formula for the moments of the Gaussian orthogonal ensemble , Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e Probab. Stat. 45 (2009), 754–769

    2009

  28. [36]

    Li, B.-J

    S.-H. Li, B.-J. Shen, G.-F. Yu and P. J. Forrester, Discrete orthogonal ensemble on the exponential lattices , arXiv:2206.08633

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    Mezzadri and N

    F. Mezzadri and N. Simm, Moments of the transmission eigenvalues, proper delay times, and random matrix theory I , J. Math. Phys. 52 (2011), 103511. SPECTRAL ANALYSIS OF q-DEFORMED AL-SALAM–CARLITZ UNITARY ENSEMBLES 25

    2011

  30. [38]

    Mezzadri and N

    F. Mezzadri and N. Simm, Moments of the transmission eigenvalues, proper delay times and random matrix theory II , J. Math. Phys. 53 (2012), 053504

    2012

  31. [39]

    Mezzadri and N

    F. Mezzadri and N. Simm, τ -function theory of quantum chaotic transport with β = 1, 2, 4, Comm. Math. Phys. 324 (2013), 465

    2013

  32. [40]

    Morozov, A

    A. Morozov, A. Popolitov and Shakirov, Quantization of Harer-Zagier formulas , Phys. Lett. B 811 (2020), 135932

    2020

  33. [41]

    Olshanski, Macdonald-level extension of beta ensembles and large- N limit transition , Comm

    G. Olshanski, Macdonald-level extension of beta ensembles and large- N limit transition , Comm. Math. Phys. 385 (2021), 595–631

    2021

  34. [42]

    F. W. J. Olver, D. W. Lozier, R. F. Boisvert, and C. W. Clark., eds. NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010

    2010

  35. [43]

    Rahman and P

    A. Rahman and P. J. Forrester, Linear differential equations for the resolvents of the classical matrix ensembles , Random Matrices Theory Appl. 10 (2021), 2250003

    2021

  36. [44]

    X. G. Viennot, A combinatorial interpretation of the quotient-difference algorithm , Formal Power Series and Algebraic Combinatorics (Moscow, 2000), pages 379–390. Springer, Berlin, 2000

    2000

  37. [45]

    Wigner, Characteristic vectors of bordered matrices with infinite dimensions , Ann

    E. Wigner, Characteristic vectors of bordered matrices with infinite dimensions , Ann. of Math. 62 (1955), 548–564

    1955

  38. [46]

    Witte and P

    N. Witte and P. J. Forrester, Moments of the Gaussian β ensembles and the large N expansion of the densities , J. Math. Phys. 55 (2014), 083302. Department of Mathematical Sciences and Research Institute of Mathematics, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-747, Republic of Kor...

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.