Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 164 references

Understanding the fill-factor limit of organic solar cells

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that field-dependent conversion of excitons into charge-transfer states, controlled by the Stark effect on the charge-transfer-state energy, is the primary factor limiting the fill factor of low-voltage-loss organic solar…

desk verdict Worth a serious referee: the paper identifies a real gap in FF analysis and has strong TDCF evidence for one system, but the central Ex-to-CT mechanism is asserted more strongly than the model can currently support. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.22217 v1 pith:VX3YPPA2 submitted 2025-07-29 cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.app-ph

Huotian Zhang , Jun Yuan , Tong Wang , Nurlan Tokmoldin , Rokas Jasiunas , Yiting Liu , Manasi Pranav , Yuxuan Li
show 9 more authors
Xiaolei Zhang Vidmantas Gulbinas Safa Shoaee Yingping Zou Veaceslav Coropceanu Artem A. Bakulin Dieter Neher Thomas Kirchartz Feng Gao
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.app-ph
keywords organicsolarcellsfillfactorfreechargegenerationgeminaterecombinationcharge-transferstateStarkeffectMarcustheoryexcitonlifetime
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish why organic solar cells with very low voltage losses often have poor fill factors, and what sets the fill-factor limit. Using devices spanning fill factors from 0.27 to 0.80 and voltage losses from about 0.5 to 1.1 eV, the authors show that transport and bimolecular recombination cannot explain the sharp fill-factor drop at low voltage loss; instead, geminate recombination through a field-dependent step from exciton to charge-transfer states is the culprit. They build an analytical model in which the electric field shifts the charge-transfer-state energy through the Stark effect and changes the Marcus rate for exciton-to-charge-transfer conversion, reproducing measured current-voltage curves. If the paper is right, the route to higher efficiency is to suppress non-radiative exciton decay and increase exciton lifetime, which improves fill factor and open-circuit voltage together.

What carries the argument

The central object is the donor-acceptor charge-transfer (CT) state. Its energy shifts under the applied field through the first- and second-order Stark effect, $\Delta E_{\mathrm{CT}} = -\boldsymbol{\mu}_{\mathrm{CT}} F - \frac{1}{2} \alpha_{\mathrm{CT}} F^2$, and this shift enters the Marcus rates $k_{\mathrm{Ex}\to\mathrm{CT}}$ and $k_{\mathrm{CT}\to\mathrm{Ex}}$ for interconversion between the exciton (Ex) and CT states. The field-induced increase of $k_{\mathrm{Ex}\to\mathrm{CT}}$ and decrease of $k_{\mathrm{CT}\to\mathrm{Ex}}$ make free-charge generation bias-dependent, parameterised in the device model by $\beta$ in $J_G(V) = J_{\mathrm{Abs}}\eta_{\mathrm{int}}[1 + (1/\eta_{\mathrm{int}} - 1)\beta|V - V_{\mathrm{OC}}|]$. The supporting experiments, time-delayed collection field, pump-push photocurrent, and bias-dependent photoluminescence, locate the field dependence at the Ex-to-CT step rather than at CT dissociation.

What would settle it

Measure the bias-dependent CT-state population directly in a low-offset blend such as PTO2:Y1 with transient absorption or time-resolved infrared spectroscopy. If the CT population grows faster under reverse bias while the exciton decay rate extracted from photoluminescence is unchanged, then field-dependent CT dissociation is doing the work, and the Ex-to-CT Stark/Marcus picture would not be the limiting mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that field-dependent free charge generation, rather than transport or bimolecular recombination alone, is the primary mechanism limiting fill factor in low-voltage-loss organic solar cells, and that the specific field-sensitive step is the transition from the exciton (Ex) to the charge-transfer (CT) state. This follows from a survey of devices spanning fill factors 0.27 to 0.80 and voltage losses 0.5 to 1.1 eV, where the low-voltage-loss boundary shows fill factor collapsing despite good mobilities and a reconstructed fill factor far above the measured one. The authors argue that the electric field changes the Ex-to-CT transition rate through the Stark effect on the CT-state energy, and they reproduce measured current-voltage curves with an analytical model using a field-dependence coefficient $\beta$. They conclude that suppressing non-radiative exciton decay and increasing exciton lifetime can raise fill factor without sacrificing open-circuit voltage.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the electric field mainly changes the rate of the exciton-to-charge-transfer transition, and not the dissociation of charge-transfer states or a direct field-assisted splitting of excitons into free charges.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In low-voltage-loss blends, a low internal generation efficiency $\eta_{\mathrm{int}}$ combined with a nonzero $\beta$ directly lowers fill factor, so geminate recombination joins transport as a first-order fill-factor parameter.
  • Increasing the exciton lifetime shifts the simulated fill-factor-versus-voltage-loss curve so that high fill factor persists at smaller energetic offsets.
  • Design strategies that raise the radiative recombination rate to boost photoluminescence quantum yield are counterproductive if they shorten the exciton lifetime, because the fill-factor penalty cancels the open-circuit-voltage gain.
  • The Stark-effect model identifies the CT-state dipole moment and polarizability as tunable molecular parameters; in bulk heterojunctions with randomly oriented dipoles, the polarizability term dominates.
  • The same framework explains historical fill-factor improvements: Y6-family acceptors with slower exciton decay outperform earlier ITIC-based materials at low voltage loss.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension is to use electroabsorption spectroscopy on blends as a predictive screen: materials with larger CT-state polarizability should show larger $\beta$ and lower fill factor at a given voltage loss.
  • The mechanism should also affect organic photodiodes and other biased excitonic devices, where field-assisted exciton-to-CT conversion would change responsivity near the operating bias.
  • Reducing reorganization energy or improving exciton diffusion should act like a longer exciton lifetime in softening the fill-factor-voltage-loss trade-off; the paper mentions these as extensions but does not quantify them.
  • If the Ex-to-CT step is the bottleneck, then published blends with identical voltage loss but different exciton lifetimes should cluster along different fill-factor frontiers, which could be checked without new measurements.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper investigates the fill-factor (FF) limit of organic solar cells (OSCs) by combining device characterization, spectroscopy, and modelling. It compiles a large dataset of OSCs spanning FF values 0.27–0.80 and voltage losses 0.5–1.1 eV, identifies a left boundary in the FF–voltage-loss plane for low-voltage-loss devices, and selects four blends (PM6:Y11, PM6:Y1, PM6:IEICO-4F, PTO2:Y1) for detailed study. Using TDCF measurements, bias-dependent photoluminescence, and pump-push photocurrent, the authors argue that field-dependent free charge generation—attributed specifically to the electric-field-dependent transition between exciton (Ex) and charge-transfer (CT) states—is a primary factor limiting FF beyond conventional transport/recombination limits. An empirical linearization (Eq. (4)) with parameters fitted from TDCF data reproduces the measured JV curves in Fig. 2e, and a Marcus/Stark model in Supplementary Note 2 is used to illustrate how the Ex-to-CT rate depends on field, motivating the design recommendation that suppressing non-radiative exciton decay and tuning CT dipole/polarizability can improve FF and VOC simultaneously.

Significance. If the mechanism claim is correct, the paper would provide actionable design rules for low-voltage-loss OSCs: increasing exciton lifetime and engineering the CT-state dipole/polarizability could raise FF without sacrificing VOC. The curated dataset of many published OSCs with voltage losses and FFs is a valuable community resource, and the PTO2:Y1 case (reconstructed FF 0.58 from transport/recombination parameters vs. measured 0.27) convincingly demonstrates that conventional non-geminate recombination metrics alone cannot explain the low FF. The paper also credits the use of an open-source drift-diffusion code (DriftFusionOPV), aiding reproducibility of the simulated trends. However, the central attribution of the field-dependent step to the Ex-to-CT transition is not yet quantitatively supported: the empirical beta values from TDCF are used in the JV simulation, while the microscopic Marcus/Stark model is only compared schematically against the measured FF and PL data. As a result, the paper currently establishes a phenomenological link between FF and field-dependent generation, but the specific mechanistic conclusion is more tentative than the text claims.

major comments (3)
  1. [Eq. (4), Supplementary Table 3, Fig. 2e] The parameters eta_int and beta in Eq. (4) are extracted from the same TDCF data whose fitted lines are shown in Fig. 2a–d, and those fitted parameters are then used to simulate the JV curves in Fig. 2e. The agreement is therefore a two-parameter consistency check rather than an independent reproduction of the measured curves. The claim that the simulation 'reproduces' the JV curves overstates the evidential weight. To make the model testable, the authors should validate Eq. (4) on data not used in the fit (e.g., intensity- or temperature-dependent JV curves) or explicitly reframe Fig. 2e as an interpolation. This is load-bearing for the paper's assertion that Eq. (4) 'captures the key physical parameters that determine the FF'.
  2. [Supplementary Note 2, Fig. 4, Supplementary Table 3] The Marcus/Stark model is never quantitatively compared with the measured field-dependence coefficients beta in Supplementary Table 3 (0.6, 0.27, 0.05, 0.09 V^-1). The parameters listed after Eq. (13) — ECT = 1.4 eV, HEx-CT = 0.01 eV, dCT = 1.5 nm, alphaCT = 8.5e5 A^3, lambda = 0.5 eV — are assumed literature values with no uncertainty, and the model output appears only as schematic trends in Fig. 4a,b and Supplementary Fig. 12. As written, the attribution of the field-dependent step to the Ex-to-CT transition is asserted rather than demonstrated. The authors should either fit or constrain the model to reproduce the measured beta values and the magnitude of the bias-dependent PL quenching, or explicitly state that the microscopic model is illustrative and soften the abstract and conclusory claims.
  3. [§Fill-factor limit and geminate pairs; Supplementary Note 1] The exclusion of field-dependent CT dissociation (Process 5) and direct Ex-to-FC separation rests on indirect evidence: PPPC kinetics at short circuit, bias-independent PL of pristine films (Supplementary Fig. 11g,j), and cited prior work. These measurements do not directly constrain the field dependence of CT dissociation in the voltage range near the maximum-power point, which is where FF is set. Moreover, the paper itself acknowledges in Supplementary Note 1 that the power-series form is used because 'it is unclear which process the electric field dependence comes from'; this admission undercuts the subsequent exclusivity of the Ex-to-CT mechanism. A direct test would be to model the measured JG(V) and bias-dependent PL with a CT-dissociation (e.g., Braun/Onsager) term and show that it cannot reproduce the data, or to vary the CT binding energy experimentally and compare the resulting beta.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table 1 caption] The caption states that PTO2:Y1 'shows a lower reconstructed FF compared with the measured FF', but the table reports a reconstructed FF of 0.58 against a measured FF of 0.27; the comparison direction is reversed.
  2. [Supplementary Note 1] There is a typo in the sentence 'discussed in zthe previous section'; it should read 'discussed in the previous section'.
  3. [Fig. 2f] The text describes the four NFA examples as dots in Fig. 2f, while the caption refers to solid-coloured circles; please align the wording.
  4. [Fig. 1b] The green 'left boundary' curve is described as a guide-to-the-eye; it would be helpful to state explicitly that it is not a fitted model curve, to avoid implying a quantitative boundary.
  5. [General presentation] The paper would benefit from defining the 'left border' region of Fig. 1b with a quantitative criterion (e.g., a threshold in voltage loss and FF), since the subsequent selection of the four blends relies on this grouping.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

Partial circularity: the JV 'simulation' is a consistency check using TDCF-fitted β and η_int, and the Figure 4b exciton-lifetime trend is an input sweep of kEx; the microscopic Ex-to-CT mechanism retains independent spectroscopic support.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 'Fill factor and free charge generation', Eq. (4), Figure 2e; Supplementary Table 3.]
    "β can be deduced together with ηint from the FC generation experiments (e.g., TDCF). We simulate the JV curves of PM6:Y11, PM6:Y1, PM6:IEICO-4F, and PTO2:Y1 as shown in Figure 2e. The parameters for the simulation are listed in Supplementary Table 3, and were derived from the TDCF and ellipsometry measurements. The simulation curves reproduce the JV curves in Figure 2a-d, indicating that Equation (4) captures the key physical parameters that determine the FF."

    The field-dependence coefficient β and the internal generation efficiency η_int are extracted by fitting the same TDCF free-charge-generation data that Eq. (4) parameterizes. Computing J(V) from Eq. (4) with these fitted values and then 'reproducing' the measured JV curves is a consistency check of the interpolation formula, not an independent prediction. The FF-versus-β landscape in Figure 2f is likewise generated from the same fitted parameterization, so the statement that field-dependent FC generation limits FF is substantially a restatement of the fitted slope rather than a test of a physical mechanism.

  2. other [Section 'Fill-factor limit and donor-acceptor charge transfer', Figure 4b; Supplementary Note 3.]
    "As exciton dissociation also competes with exciton decay, a slow exciton decay rate can significantly mitigate this field dependence. As shown in Figure 4b, although the FF inevitably decreases at lower voltage losses, a slower exciton decay rate preserves a high FF down to a smaller voltage loss."

    In the drift-diffusion model of Supplementary Note 3, kEx is an input parameter swept from 1×10^9 to 1×10^11 s^-1 in the exciton population equation dχ/dt = GEx − βcorr kEx−CT χ − kEx χ + kCT−Ex ξ. A smaller kEx mechanically leaves more excitons available for dissociation, so the simulated FF-versus-voltage-loss curves at different kEx values (Figure 4b) encode the input assumption rather than provide a measured test. The paper presents this sweep as a result ('a slow exciton decay rate can significantly mitigate this field dependence') without quantitatively connecting the assumed Stark/Marcus parameters to the measured β values, so the model cannot independently confirm the Ex-to-CT mechanism.

full rationale

The paper's central mechanistic claim — that field-dependent free-charge generation is primarily due to the electric-field dependence of the Ex-to-CT transition — is not, by itself, circular: it is supported by independent spectroscopic observations (pump-push photocurrent kinetics resembling neat-acceptor excitons, bias-dependent PL in blends, field-independent PL of pristine films, and transient absorption timescales). The self-citations (refs 36 and 37, both involving co-authors) corroborate this conclusion but are not the sole load-bearing evidence, and external lifetime trends (slower Y6-family exciton decay) provide additional empirical support. The main circularity is in the phenomenological chain: η_int and β are fitted to the TDCF data, then Eq. (4) is used with these same fitted values to 'simulate' and reproduce the JV curves, making the FF-field-dependence demonstration a parameterization rather than an out-of-sample prediction. A second, milder built-in element is the Figure 4b result that slow exciton decay preserves FF, which follows directly from sweeping the input kEx in the rate equations; the external lifetime data render this plausible but not quantitatively validated against the TDCF-derived β values. Because the central mechanism retains independent experimental content, the overall circularity is partial rather than total.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central mechanism is built from parameterized fits to TDCF data (beta, eta_int) plus a drift-diffusion model with several chosen or literature-sourced parameters (H_ExCT, dCT, alpha_CT, lambda, kEx range). None of these are invented entities, but the quantitative predictions are not fully pinned down by independent measurements, so the model carries a moderate burden of untested choices.

free parameters (8)
  • beta (field-dependence coefficient) per blend = PM6:Y11 0.6, PM6:Y1 0.27, PM6:IEICO-4F 0.05, PTO2:Y1 0.09 V^-1
    Deduced from linear fits to TDCF free-charge-generation curves; enters Eq. (4) and the JV simulations in Fig. 2e.
  • eta_int (internal generation efficiency at open circuit) per blend = 0.72, 0.55, 0.34, 0.06
    Extracted from TDCF data and absorbed-photon flux from ellipsometry/transfer-matrix modelling; used in Eq. (4).
  • alpha (figure of merit for transport/recombination) per blend = 2.7, 4.3, 5.3, 5.4
    Derived from measured mobility and bimolecular recombination coefficient; used to reconstruct the transport-limited FF in Table 1.
  • H_ExCT (electronic coupling between Ex and CT) = 0.01 eV
    Chosen model parameter in Supp Note 2; not measured for the specific blends.
  • dCT (charge-transfer state radius) = 1.5 nm
    Taken from prior simulation of PM6:Y6 (ref 161); controls alpha_CT through the d^4 scaling relation.
  • alpha_CT (CT state polarizability) = 8.5 x 10^5 A^3
    Derived from dCT via polarizability scaling, not measured in this work; central to the second-order Stark effect in the model.
  • lambda (reorganization energy) = 0.5 eV
    Chosen from a controversial literature range of 250-600 meV (Supp Note 2); affects the field dependence of kEx-CT.
  • kEx (exciton decay rate) in drift-diffusion model = 10^9 to 10^11 s^-1 (swept)
    Swept to produce Fig. 4b; the 'slow exciton decay preserves FF' result depends directly on this input range.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Marcus theory semiclassical nonadiabatic electron transfer rates describe Ex-CT and CT-Ex transitions (Supp Note 2, Eqs. 13-14).
    The analytical model rests on Marcus kinetics for charge transfer in disordered organic blends, with parameters that are not independently verified here.
  • domain assumption The Stark effect shifts CT state energy as -mu_CT F - (1/2) alpha_CT F^2, and Ex dipole/polarizability is negligible compared with CT (Supp Note 2, Eq. 15).
    The model attributes field dependence mainly to the CT state, using reference values for TCNQ to justify neglecting the exciton response.
  • domain assumption The field dependence of free charge generation can be linearized as a power series in the ratio of external to internal electric fields, retaining only the first-order term (Supp Note 1).
    This leads to Eq. (4) and the beta parameterization; it assumes small s and a linear regime, consistent with the measured TDCF data but not derived from first principles.
  • domain assumption Bias-dependent PL intensity is a faithful indicator of exciton population in the studied blends, because PL is dominated by exciton recombination rather than CT or free-carrier recombination (section 'Fill-factor limit and geminate pairs').
    The inference that field-dependent PL means field-dependent Ex dissociation depends on this assignment, supported by PPPC and prior reports.
  • domain assumption The internal electric field is uniform across the active layer and equals (V - VOC)/d.
    Used to translate voltage bias into field strength for PL and model calculations; ignores space-charge and contact fields.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Understanding the fill-factor limit of organic solar cells." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VX3YPPA2

@misc{pith2026250722217,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Understanding the fill-factor limit of organic solar cells},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VX3YPPA2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.22217}
}
read the original abstract

Although the power conversion efficiencies of organic solar cells (OSCs) have surpassed 20%, they still lag behind commercial inorganic solar cells and emerging perovskite solar cells. To bridge this efficiency gap, improving the fill factor (FF) is critical, provided other photovoltaic parameters are not compromised. However, the fundamental understanding of the FF in OSCs remains incomplete. In this work, we systematically investigate a wide range of OSCs with the FF values spanning 0.27 to 0.80, and analyse the effect of free charge generation and recombination on the FF in OSCs. To explain our observations, we developed an analytical model that quantitatively correlates the applied electric field with the energetics of excited states in donor-acceptor blends. By combining device characterisation, spectroscopy, and theoretical modelling, we reveal that the Stark effect and the field-dependent charge transfer significantly impact the FF in state-of-the-art OSCs with low voltage losses. Our findings highlight that suppressing geminate decay by increasing exciton lifetime is a promising strategy for boosting the FF and achieving future efficiency gains in OSCs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

164 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Zhu, L. et al. Achieving 20.8% organic solar cells via additive-assisted layer-by-layer fabrication with bulk p-i-n structure and improved optical management. Joule 8, 3153– 3168 (2024)

    2024

  2. [2]

    Yu, Y. et al. Naphthalene diimide-based cathode interlayer material enables 20.2% efficiency in organic photovoltaic cells. Sci. China Chem. 67, 4194–4201 (2024)

    2024

  3. [3]

    Qian, D. et al. Design rules for minimizing voltage losses in high-efficiency organic solar cells. Nat. Mater. 17, 703–709 (2018)

    2018

  4. [4]

    Chen, X.-K. et al. A unified description of non-radiative voltage losses in organic solar cells. Nat. Energy 6, 799–806 (2021)

    2021

  5. [5]

    Yuan, J. et al. Enabling low voltage losses and high photocurrent in fullerene-free organic photovoltaics. Nat. Commun. 10, 570 (2019)

    2019

  6. [6]

    Yuan, J. et al. Single-Junction Organic Solar Cell with over 15% Efficiency Using Fused-Ring Acceptor with Electron-Deficient Core. Joule 3, 1140–1151 (2019)

    2019

  7. [7]

    Zhao, W. et al. Fullerene-Free Polymer Solar Cells with over 11% Efficiency and Excellent Thermal Stability. Adv. Mater. 28, 4734–4739 (2016)

    2016

  8. [8]

    Liu, J. et al. Fast charge separation in a non-fullerene organic solar cell with a small driving force. Nat. Energy 1, 16089 (2016)

    2016

Show all 164 references
  1. [9]

    Wang, Y. et al. Origins of the open-circuit voltage in ternary organic solar cells and design rules for minimized voltage losses. Nat. Energy 8, 978–988 (2023)

    2023

  2. [10]

    Eisner, F. D. et al. Hybridization of Local Exciton and Charge-Transfer States Reduces Nonradiative Voltage Losses in Organic Solar Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 6362– 6374 (2019)

    2019

  3. [11]

    Classen, A. et al. The role of exciton lifetime for charge generation in organic solar cells at negligible energy-level offsets. Nat. Energy 5, 711–719 (2020)

    2020

  4. [12]

    Zhang, X. et al. On the understanding of energy loss and device fill factor trade-offs in non-fullerene organic solar cells with varied energy levels. Nano Energy 75, 105032 (2020)

    2020

  5. [13]

    Yang, G. et al. Stable and low-photovoltage-loss perovskite solar cells by multifunctional passivation. Nat. Photonics 15, 681–689 (2021)

    2021

  6. [14]

    Wang, R. et al. Constructive molecular configurations for surface-defect passivation of perovskite photovoltaics. Science (80-. ). 366, 1509–1513 (2019)

    2019

  7. [15]

    Stolterfoht, M. et al. Visualization and suppression of interfacial recombination for high-efficiency large-area pin perovskite solar cells. Nat. Energy 3, 847–854 (2018)

    2018

  8. [16]

    & Kirchartz, T

    Rau, U. & Kirchartz, T. Charge Carrier Collection and Contact Selectivity in Solar Cells. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 6, (2019)

    2019

  9. [17]

    Köhler, M. et al. A silicon carbide-based highly transparent passivating contact for crystalline silicon solar cells approaching efficiencies of 24%. Nat. Energy 6, 529–537 (2021)

    2021

  10. [18]

    J., Schubert, M

    Einsele, F., Rostan, P. J., Schubert, M. B. & Rau, U. Recombination and resistive losses at ZnO∕a-Si:H∕c-Si interfaces in heterojunction back contacts for Si solar cells. J. Appl. Phys. 102, (2007)

    2007

  11. [19]

    & Manca, J

    Vandewal, K., Tvingstedt, K., Gadisa, A., Inganäs, O. & Manca, J. V. On the origin of the open-circuit voltage of polymer-fullerene solar cells. Nat. Mater. 8, 904–909 (2009)

    2009

  12. [20]

    & Manca, J

    Vandewal, K., Tvingstedt, K., Gadisa, A., Inganäs, O. & Manca, J. V. Relating the open-circuit voltage to interface molecular properties of donor:acceptor bulk heterojunction solar cells. Phys. Rev. B 81, 125204 (2010)

    2010

  13. [21]

    Green, M. A. Accuracy of analytical expressions for solar cell fill factors. Sol. Cells 7, 337–340 (1982)

    1982

  14. [22]

    Razzaq, A., Allen, T. G. & De Wolf, S. Design Criteria for Silicon Solar Cells with Fill Factors Approaching the Auger Limit. ACS Energy Lett. 8, 4438–4440 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    E., Kirkpatrick, J., Rau, U

    Kirchartz, T., Pieters, B. E., Kirkpatrick, J., Rau, U. & Nelson, J. Recombination via tail states in polythiophene:fullerene solar cells. Phys. Rev. B 83, 115209 (2011)

    2011

  16. [24]

    & Nelson, J

    Kirchartz, T. & Nelson, J. Meaning of reaction orders in polymer:fullerene solar cells. Phys. Rev. B 86, 165201 (2012)

    2012

  17. [25]

    Liu, W. et al. Light-induced activation of boron doping in hydrogenated amorphous silicon for over 25% efficiency silicon solar cells. Nat. Energy 7, 427–437 (2022)

    2022

  18. [26]

    Cao, Q. et al. Efficient and stable inverted perovskite solar cells with very high fill factors via incorporation of star-shaped polymer. Sci. Adv. 7, 1–12 (2021)

    2021

  19. [27]

    & Kirchartz, T

    Kaienburg, P., Rau, U. & Kirchartz, T. Extracting Information about the Electronic Quality of Organic Solar-Cell Absorbers from Fill Factor and Thickness. Phys. Rev. Appl. 6, 024001 (2016)

    2016

  20. [28]

    Bartesaghi, D. et al. Competition between recombination and extraction of free charges determines the fill factor of organic solar cells. Nat. Commun. 6, 7083 (2015)

    2015

  21. [29]

    & Koster, L

    Neher, D., Kniepert, J., Elimelech, A. & Koster, L. J. A. A New Figure of Merit for Organic Solar Cells with Transport-limited Photocurrents. Sci. Rep. 6, 24861 (2016)

    2016

  22. [30]

    Song, X. et al. Dual Sensitizer and Processing-Aid Behavior of Donor Enables Efficient Ternary Organic Solar Cells. Joule 3, 846–857 (2019)

    2019

  23. [31]

    Liu, S. et al. High-efficiency organic solar cells with low non-radiative recombination loss and low energetic disorder. Nat. Photonics 14, 300–305 (2020)

    2020

  24. [32]

    Sun, B. et al. Toward More Efficient Organic Solar Cells: A Detailed Study of Loss Pathway and Its Impact on Overall Device Performance in Low‐Offset Organic Solar Cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 13, (2023)

    2023

  25. [33]

    Bakulin, A. A. et al. The Role of Driving Energy and Delocalized States for Charge Separation in Organic Semiconductors. Science (80-. ). 335, 1340–1344 (2012)

    2012

  26. [34]

    Maimaris, M. et al. Sub-10-fs observation of bound exciton formation in organic optoelectronic devices. Nat. Commun. 13, 4949 (2022)

    2022

  27. [35]

    Nakano, K. et al. Anatomy of the energetic driving force for charge generation in organic solar cells. Nat. Commun. 10, 2520 (2019)

    2019

  28. [36]

    Pranav, M. et al. Anticorrelated photoluminescence and free charge generation proves field-assisted exciton dissociation in low-offset PM6:Y5 organic solar cells. APL Mater. 11, (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    Pranav, M. et al. On the critical competition between singlet exciton decay and free charge generation in non-fullerene based organic solar cells with low energetic offsets. Energy Environ. Sci. 17, 6676–6697 (2024)

    2024

  30. [38]

    Qian, D. et al. Correlating the Hybridization of Local‐Exciton and Charge‐Transfer States with Charge Generation in Organic Solar Cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 13, 1–9 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    Perdigón-Toro, L. et al. Excitons Dominate the Emission from PM6:Y6 Solar Cells, but This Does Not Help the Open-Circuit Voltage of the Device. ACS Energy Lett. 6, 557–564 (2021)

    2021

  32. [40]

    Wang, R. et al. Charge Separation from an Intra-Moiety Intermediate State in the High- Performance PM6:Y6 Organic Photovoltaic Blend. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 12751– 12759 (2020)

    2020

  33. [41]

    Giannini, S. et al. On the role of charge transfer excitations in non-fullerene acceptors for organic photovoltaics. Mater. Today 80, 308–326 (2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    Zheng, Z. et al. PBDB-T and its derivatives: A family of polymer donors enables over 17% efficiency in organic photovoltaics. Mater. Today 35, 115–130 (2020)

    2020

  35. [43]

    Bertrandie, J. et al. The Energy Level Conundrum of Organic Semiconductors in Solar Cells. Adv. Mater. 34, (2022)

    2022

  36. [44]

    Yao, H. et al. 14.7% Efficiency Organic Photovoltaic Cells Enabled by Active Materials with a Large Electrostatic Potential Difference. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 7743–7750 (2019)

    2019

  37. [45]

    Devižis, A. et al. Dissociation of Charge Transfer States and Carrier Separation in Bilayer Organic Solar Cells: A Time-Resolved Electroabsorption Spectroscopy Study. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 8192–8198 (2015)

    2015

  38. [46]

    & Inganäs, O

    Tvingstedt, K., Vandewal, K., Zhang, F. & Inganäs, O. On the dissociation efficiency of charge transfer excitons and Frenkel excitons in organic solar cells: A luminescence quenching study. J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 21824–21832 (2010)

    2010

  39. [47]

    Gerhard, M. et al. Field-induced exciton dissociation in PTB7-based organic solar cells. Phys. Rev. B 95, 195301 (2017)

    2017

  40. [48]

    Koster, L. J. A., Smits, E. C. P., Mihailetchi, V. D. & Blom, P. W. M. Device model for the operation of polymer/fullerene bulk heterojunction solar cells. Phys. Rev. B 72, 085205 (2005)

    2005

  41. [49]

    & Dyakonov, V

    Deibel, C., Strobel, T. & Dyakonov, V. Origin of the Efficient Polaron-Pair Dissociation in Polymer-Fullerene Blends. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 036402 (2009)

    2009

  42. [50]

    Gillett, A. J. et al. The role of charge recombination to triplet excitons in organic solar cells. Nature 597, 666–671 (2021)

    2021

  43. [51]

    Carr, J. M. et al. Short and long-range electron transfer compete to determine free- charge yield in organic semiconductors. Mater. Horizons 9, 312–324 (2022)

    2022

  44. [52]

    Deviations from Ohm’s Law in Weak Electrolytes

    Onsager, L. Deviations from Ohm’s Law in Weak Electrolytes. J. Chem. Phys. 2, 599– 615 (1934)

    1934

  45. [53]

    Initial Recombination of Ions

    Onsager, L. Initial Recombination of Ions. Phys. Rev. 54, 554–557 (1938)

    1938

  46. [54]

    On Pre-Breakdown Phenomena in Insulators and Electronic Semi- Conductors

    Frenkel, J. On Pre-Breakdown Phenomena in Insulators and Electronic Semi- Conductors. Phys. Rev. 54, 647–648 (1938)

    1938

  47. [55]

    Hartke, J. L. The Three-Dimensional Poole-Frenkel Effect. J. Appl. Phys. 39, 4871– 4873 (1968)

    1968

  48. [56]

    Braun, C. L. Electric field assisted dissociation of charge transfer states as a mechanism of photocarrier production. J. Chem. Phys. 80, 4157–4161 (1984)

    1984

  49. [57]

    & Silver, M

    Ries, B., Schönherr, G., Bässler, H. & Silver, M. Monte carlo simulations of geminate- pair dissociation in discrete anisotropic lattices. Philos. Mag. B Phys. Condens. Matter; Stat. Mech. Electron. Opt. Magn. Prop. 48, 87–106 (1983)

    1983

  50. [58]

    & Tessler, N

    Liraz, D. & Tessler, N. Charge dissociation in organic solar cells—from Onsager and Frenkel to modern models. Chem. Phys. Rev. 3, (2022)

    2022

  51. [59]

    E., Taretto, K

    Kirchartz, T., Pieters, B. E., Taretto, K. & Rau, U. Electro-optical modeling of bulk heterojunction solar cells. J. Appl. Phys. 104, (2008)

    2008

  52. [60]

    Zhang, G. et al. Delocalization of exciton and electron wavefunction in non-fullerene acceptor molecules enables efficient organic solar cells. Nat. Commun. 1–10 (2020) doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17867-1

    2020 doi

  53. [61]

    Chen, X.-K. et al. Intermolecular CT excitons enable nanosecond excited-state lifetimes in NIR-absorbing non-fullerene acceptors for efficient organic solar cells. 1– 32 (2023)

    2023

  54. [62]

    Zou, X. et al. An Insight into the Excitation States of Small Molecular Semiconductor Y6. Molecules 25, (2020)

    2020

  55. [63]

    Wang, Z. et al. The role of interfacial donor–acceptor percolation in efficient and stable all-polymer solar cells. Nat. Commun. 15, 1212 (2024)

    2024

  56. [64]

    Perdigón‐Toro, L. et al. Understanding the Role of Order in Y‐Series Non‐Fullerene Solar Cells to Realize High Open‐Circuit Voltages. Adv. Energy Mater. 12, (2022)

    2022

  57. [65]

    Zhu, Y. et al. Suppressing Exciton‐Vibration Coupling to Prolong Exciton Lifetime of Nonfullerene Acceptors Enables High‐Efficiency Organic Solar Cells. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 63, 1–9 (2024)

    2024

  58. [66]

    Chen, Q. et al. Hierarchical Solid‐Additive Strategy for Achieving Layer‐by‐Layer Organic Solar Cells with Over 19 % Efficiency. Angew. Chemie 136, (2024)

    2024

  59. [67]

    Cai, Y. et al. Vertically optimized phase separation with improved exciton diffusion enables efficient organic solar cells with thick active layers. Nat. Commun. 13, 2369 (2022)

    2022

  60. [68]

    Suthar, R. et al. Role of Exciton Lifetime, Energetic Offsets, and Disorder in Voltage Loss of Bulk Heterojunction Organic Solar Cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 15, 3214–3223 (2023)

    2023

  61. [69]

    Lee, T. H. et al. Organic Planar Heterojunction Solar Cells and Photodetectors Tailored to the Exciton Diffusion Length Scale of a Non‐Fullerene Acceptor. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, (2022)

    2022

  62. [70]

    Zhang, Y. et al. Long exciton diffusion distance and efficient exciton dissociation enable high efficiency planar heterojunction non-fullerene organic solar cells. Mater. Today Phys. 46, 101495 (2024)

    2024

  63. [71]

    Zhang, K.-N. et al. Exploring the mechanisms of exciton diffusion improvement in ternary polymer solar cells: From ultrafast to ultraslow temporal scale. Nano Energy 79, 105513 (2021)

    2021

  64. [72]

    Zhu, L. et al. Small Exciton Binding Energies Enabling Direct Charge Photogeneration Towards Low‐Driving‐Force Organic Solar Cells. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 60, 15348– 15353 (2021)

    2021

  65. [73]

    Hartnett, P. E. et al. Slip-stacked perylenediimides as an alternative strategy for high efficiency nonfullerene acceptors in organic photovoltaics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 16345–16356 (2014)

    2014

  66. [74]

    Ye, L. et al. Enhanced efficiency in fullerene-free polymer solar cell by incorporating fine-designed donor and acceptor materials. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 9274–9280 (2015)

    2015

  67. [75]

    Liang, N. et al. Perylene diimide trimers based bulk heterojunction organic solar cells with efficiency over 7%. Adv. Energy Mater. 6, 1600060 (2016)

    2016

  68. [76]

    Zang, Y. et al. Integrated Molecular, Interfacial, and Device Engineering towards High‐Performance Non‐Fullerene Based Organic Solar Cells. Adv. Mater. 26, 5708– 5714 (2014)

    2014

  69. [77]

    Sun, D. et al. Non-fullerene-acceptor-based bulk-heterojunction organic solar cells with efficiency over 7%. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 11156–11162 (2015)

    2015

  70. [78]

    Meng, D. et al. High-performance solution-processed non-fullerene organic solar cells based on selenophene-containing perylene bisimide acceptor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 375–380 (2016)

    2016

  71. [79]

    Zhang, X. et al. A potential perylene diimide dimer‐based acceptor material for highly efficient solution‐processed non‐fullerene organic solar cells with 4.03% efficiency. Adv. Mater. 25, 5791–5797 (2013)

    2013

  72. [80]

    Lin, Y. et al. A star‐shaped perylene diimide electron acceptor for high‐performance organic solar cells. Adv. Mater. 26, 5137–5142 (2014)

    2014

  73. [81]

    Duan, Y. et al. Pronounced effects of a triazine core on photovoltaic performance– efficient organic solar cells enabled by a PDI trimer‐based small molecular acceptor. Adv. Mater. 29, 1605115 (2017)

    2017

  74. [82]

    Lin, H. et al. Reduced Intramolecular Twisting Improves the Performance of 3D Molecular Acceptors in Non‐Fullerene Organic Solar Cells. Adv. Mater. 28, 8546– 8551 (2016)

    2016

  75. [83]

    M., Chen, W

    Wu, Q., Zhao, D., Schneider, A. M., Chen, W. & Yu, L. Covalently Bound Clusters of Alpha-Substituted PDI Rival Electron Acceptors to Fullerene for Organic Solar Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 7248–7251 (2016)

    2016

  76. [84]

    Zhong, Y. et al. Efficient organic solar cells with helical perylene diimide electron acceptors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 15215–15221 (2014)

    2014

  77. [85]

    Zhong, Y. et al. Molecular helices as electron acceptors in high-performance bulk heterojunction solar cells. Nat. Commun. 6, 1–8 (2015)

    2015

  78. [86]

    Zhong, H. et al. Rigidifying nonplanar perylene diimides by ring fusion toward geometry‐tunable acceptors for high‐performance fullerene‐free solar cells. Adv. Mater. 28, 951–958 (2016)

    2016

  79. [87]

    Meng, D. et al. Three-bladed rylene propellers with three-dimensional network assembly for organic electronics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 10184–10190 (2016)

    2016

  80. [88]

    Tan, Z. et al. Efficient all-polymer solar cells based on blend of tris (thienylenevinylene)-substituted polythiophene and poly [perylene diimide-alt-bis (dithienothiophene)]. Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 307 (2008)

    2008

  81. [89]

    Zhan, X. et al. Copolymers of perylene diimide with dithienothiophene and dithienopyrrole as electron-transport materials for all-polymer solar cells and field- effect transistors. J. Mater. Chem. 19, 5794–5803 (2009)

    2009

  82. [90]

    Zhou, E. et al. All‐Polymer Solar Cells from Perylene Diimide Based Copolymers: Material Design and Phase Separation Control. Angew. Chemie 123, 2851–2855 (2011)

    2011

  83. [91]

    Zhou, Y. et al. High performance all‐polymer solar cell via polymer side‐chain engineering. Adv. Mater. 26, 3767–3772 (2014)

    2014

  84. [92]

    Guo, Y. et al. A Vinylene‐Bridged Perylenediimide‐Based Polymeric Acceptor Enabling Efficient All‐Polymer Solar Cells Processed under Ambient Conditions. Adv. Mater. 28, 8483–8489 (2016)

    2016

  85. [93]

    Fan, B. et al. Optimisation of processing solvent and molecular weight for the production of green-solvent-processed all-polymer solar cells with a power conversion efficiency over 9%. Energy Environ. Sci. 10, 1243–1251 (2017)

    2017

  86. [94]

    Gao, L. et al. All-Polymer Solar Cells Based on Absorption-Complementary Polymer Donor and Acceptor with High Power Conversion Efficiency of 8.27%. Adv. Mater. 28, 1884–1890 (2016)

    2016

  87. [95]

    Ye, L. et al. Manipulating Aggregation and Molecular Orientation in All‐Polymer Photovoltaic Cells. Adv. Mater. 27, 6046–6054 (2015)

    2015

  88. [96]

    Moore, J. R. et al. Polymer blend solar cells based on a high‐mobility naphthalenediimide‐based polymer acceptor: Device physics, photophysics and morphology. Adv. Energy Mater. 1, 230–240 (2011)

    2011

  89. [97]

    Choi, J. et al. Importance of electron transport ability in naphthalene diimide-based polymer acceptors for high-performance, additive-free, all-polymer solar cells. Chem. Mater. 27, 5230–5237 (2015)

    2015

  90. [98]

    Li, Z. et al. High Performance All-Polymer Solar Cells by Synergistic Effects of Fine- Tuned Crystallinity and Solvent Annealing. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 10935–10944 (2016)

    2016

  91. [99]

    Jung, J. W. et al. Fluoro-substituted n-type conjugated polymers for additive-free all- polymer bulk heterojunction solar cells with high power conversion efficiency of 6.71%. Adv. Mater. 27, 3310–3317 (2015)

    2015

  92. [100]

    M., Subramaniyan, S

    Earmme, T., Hwang, Y.-J., Murari, N. M., Subramaniyan, S. & Jenekhe, S. A. All- polymer solar cells with 3.3% efficiency based on naphthalene diimide-selenophene copolymer acceptor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 14960–14963 (2013)

    2013

  93. [101]

    Wang, C. et al. Ternary Organic Solar Cells with Minimum Voltage Losses. Adv. Energy Mater. 7, 1–10 (2017)

    2017

  94. [102]

    Hwang, Y.-J., Ren, G., Murari, N. M. & Jenekhe, S. A. n-type naphthalene diimide– biselenophene copolymer for all-polymer bulk heterojunction solar cells. Macromolecules 45, 9056–9062 (2012)

    2012

  95. [103]

    Lee, C. et al. High‐performance all‐polymer solar cells via side‐chain engineering of the polymer acceptor: The importance of the polymer packing structure and the nanoscale blend morphology. Adv. Mater. 27, 2466–2471 (2015)

    2015

  96. [104]

    Hwang, Y.-J., Earmme, T., Courtright, B. A. E., Eberle, F. N. & Jenekhe, S. A. n-Type semiconducting naphthalene diimide-perylene diimide copolymers: controlling crystallinity, blend morphology, and compatibility toward high-performance all- polymer solar cells. J. Am. Chem. S...

    2015

  97. [105]

    Lin, Y. et al. Structure Evolution of Oligomer Fused‐Ring Electron Acceptors toward High Efficiency of As‐Cast Polymer Solar Cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 6, 1600854 (2016)

    2016

  98. [106]

    Wang, W. et al. Fused Hexacyclic Nonfullerene Acceptor with Strong Near-Infrared Absorption for Semitransparent Organic Solar Cells with 9.77% Efficiency. Adv. Mater. 29, 1–7 (2017)

    2017

  99. [107]

    Lin, Y. et al. An electron acceptor challenging fullerenes for efficient polymer solar cells. Adv. Mater. 27, 1170–1174 (2015)

    2015

  100. [108]

    Bin, H. et al. 11.4% Efficiency non-fullerene polymer solar cells with trialkylsilyl substituted 2D-conjugated polymer as donor. Nat. Commun. 7, 1–11 (2016)

    2016

  101. [109]

    Yang, Y. et al. Side-chain isomerization on an n-type organic semiconductor ITIC acceptor makes 11.77% high efficiency polymer solar cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 15011–15018 (2016)

    2016

  102. [110]

    Gao, L. et al. High-Efficiency Nonfullerene Polymer Solar Cells with Medium Bandgap Polymer Donor and Narrow Bandgap Organic Semiconductor Acceptor. Adv. Mater. 28, 8288–8295 (2016)

    2016

  103. [111]

    Bin, H. et al. Non-fullerene polymer solar cells based on alkylthio and fluorine substituted 2D-conjugated polymers reach 9.5% efficiency. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 4657–4664 (2016)

    2016

  104. [112]

    Kan, B. et al. Small-molecule acceptor based on the heptacyclic benzodi (cyclopentadithiophene) unit for highly efficient nonfullerene organic solar cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 4929–4934 (2017)

    2017

  105. [113]

    Dai, S. et al. Fused Nonacyclic Electron Acceptors for Efficient Polymer Solar Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 1336–1343 (2017)

    2017

  106. [114]

    Li, Y. et al. Non-fullerene acceptor with low energy loss and high external quantum efficiency: towards high performance polymer solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 4, 5890– 5897 (2016)

    2016

  107. [115]

    Li, Y. et al. A fused-ring based electron acceptor for efficient non-fullerene polymer solar cells with small HOMO offset. Nano Energy 27, 430–438 (2016)

    2016

  108. [116]

    Wu, Y. et al. A planar electron acceptor for efficient polymer solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 3215–3221 (2015)

    2015

  109. [117]

    Cheng, P. et al. Realizing small energy loss of 0.55 ev, high open‐circuit voltage> 1 V and high efficiency> 10% in fullerene‐free polymer solar cells via energy driver. Adv. Mater. 29, 1605216 (2017)

    2017

  110. [118]

    Xiao, B. et al. Achievement of High Voc of 1.02 V for P3HT‐Based Organic Solar Cell Using a Benzotriazole‐Containing Non‐Fullerene Acceptor. Adv. Energy Mater. 7, 1602269 (2017)

    2017

  111. [119]

    Liu, F. et al. A thieno [3, 4-b] thiophene-based non-fullerene electron acceptor for high-performance bulk-heterojunction organic solar cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 15523–15526 (2016)

    2016

  112. [120]

    Bai, H. et al. Nonfullerene acceptors based on extended fused rings flanked with benzothiadiazolylmethylenemalononitrile for polymer solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 20758–20766 (2015)

    2015

  113. [121]

    Lin, Y. et al. A twisted dimeric perylene diimide electron acceptor for efficient organic solar cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 4, 1400420 (2014)

    2014

  114. [122]

    Li, S. et al. Energy-Level Modulation of Small-Molecule Electron Acceptors to Achieve over 12% Efficiency in Polymer Solar Cells. Adv. Mater. 28, 9423–9429 (2016)

    2016

  115. [123]

    Zhao, W. et al. Molecular Optimization Enables over 13% Efficiency in Organic Solar Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 7148–7151 (2017)

    2017

  116. [124]

    & Hou, J

    Zhang, S., Qin, Y., Zhu, J. & Hou, J. Over 14% Efficiency in Polymer Solar Cells Enabled by a Chlorinated Polymer Donor. Adv. Mater. 30, 1800868 (2018)

    2018

  117. [125]

    Liu, T. et al. A nonfullerene acceptor with a 1000 nm absorption edge enables ternary organic solar cells with improved optical and morphological properties and efficiencies over 15%. Energy Environ. Sci. 12, 2529–2536 (2019)

    2019

  118. [126]

    Yao, H. et al. Achieving highly efficient nonfullerene organic solar cells with improved intermolecular interaction and open‐circuit voltage. Adv. Mater. 29, 1700254 (2017)

    2017

  119. [127]

    Xie, D. et al. A novel thiophene‐fused ending group enabling an excellent small molecule acceptor for high‐performance fullerene‐free polymer solar cells with 11.8% efficiency. Sol. Rrl 1, 1700044 (2017)

    2017

  120. [128]

    Lin, Y. et al. High-Performance Electron Acceptor with Thienyl Side Chains for Organic Photovoltaics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 4955–4961 (2016)

    2016

  121. [129]

    Zhao, F. et al. Single-Junction Binary-Blend Nonfullerene Polymer Solar Cells with 12.1% Efficiency. Adv. Mater. 29, 1–7 (2017)

    2017

  122. [130]

    Wang, J. et al. Enhancing Performance of Nonfullerene Acceptors via Side-Chain Conjugation Strategy. Adv. Mater. 29, 1–7 (2017)

    2017

  123. [131]

    Lin, Y. et al. Mapping Polymer Donors toward High‐Efficiency Fullerene Free Organic Solar Cells. Adv. Mater. 29, 1604155 (2017)

    2017

  124. [132]

    Jia, B. et al. Rhodanine flanked indacenodithiophene as non-fullerene acceptor for efficient polymer solar cells. Sci. China Chem. 60, 257–263 (2017)

    2017

  125. [133]

    Holliday, S. et al. High-efficiency and air-stable P3HT-based polymer solar cells with a new non-fullerene acceptor. Nat. Commun. 7, 1–11 (2016)

    2016

  126. [134]

    Yan, C. et al. Enhancing performance of non-fullerene organic solar cells via side chain engineering of fused-ring electron acceptors. Dye. Pigment. 139, 627–634 (2017)

    2017

  127. [135]

    Yao, H. et al. Design and Synthesis of a Low Bandgap Small Molecule Acceptor for Efficient Polymer Solar Cells. Adv. Mater. 28, 8283–8287 (2016)

    2016

  128. [136]

    Yao, H. et al. Design, Synthesis, and Photovoltaic Characterization of a Small Molecular Acceptor with an Ultra-Narrow Band Gap. Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. 56, 3045–3049 (2017)

    2017

  129. [137]

    Li, W. et al. Molecular Order Control of Non-fullerene Acceptors for High-Efficiency Polymer Solar Cells. Joule 3, 819–833 (2019)

    2019

  130. [138]

    Lee, J. et al. Side-Chain Engineering of Nonfullerene Acceptors for Near-Infrared Organic Photodetectors and Photovoltaics. ACS Energy Lett. 4, 1401–1409 (2019)

    2019

  131. [139]

    Yang, C. et al. Effects of energy-level offset between a donor and acceptor on the photovoltaic performance of non-fullerene organic solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 7, 18889–18897 (2019)

    2019

  132. [140]

    Fan, Q. et al. Overcoming the energy loss in asymmetrical non-fullerene acceptor- based polymer solar cells by halogenation of polymer donors. J. Mater. Chem. A 7, 15404–15410 (2019)

    2019

  133. [141]

    Chen, X. et al. As-Cast Ternary Organic Solar Cells Based on an Asymmetric Side- Chains Featured Acceptor with Reduced Voltage Loss and 14.0% Efficiency. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 1–9 (2020)

    2020

  134. [142]

    Cai, Y. et al. Achieving organic solar cells with efficiency over 14% based on a non- fullerene acceptor incorporating a cyclopentathiophene unit fused backbone. J. Mater. Chem. A 8, 5194–5199 (2020)

    2020

  135. [143]

    & Zhu, W

    Tan, H., Zheng, X., Zhu, J., Yu, J. & Zhu, W. An A-D-D-A-type non-fullerene small- molecule acceptor with strong near-infrared absorption for high performance polymer solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. C 7, 13301–13306 (2019)

    2019

  136. [144]

    Wang, R. et al. Rational Tuning of Molecular Interaction and Energy Level Alignment Enables High‐Performance Organic Photovoltaics. Adv. Mater. 1904215 (2019) doi:10.1002/adma.201904215

    2019 doi

  137. [145]

    Sun, C. et al. Achieving Fast Charge Separation and Low Nonradiative Recombination Loss by Rational Fluorination for High‐Efficiency Polymer Solar Cells. Adv. Mater. 31, 1905480 (2019)

    2019

  138. [146]

    Cui, Y. et al. Over 16% efficiency organic photovoltaic cells enabled by a chlorinated acceptor with increased open-circuit voltages. Nat. Commun. 10, 2515 (2019)

    2019

  139. [147]

    Jiang, K. et al. Alkyl Chain Tuning of Small Molecule Acceptors for Efficient Organic Solar Cells. Joule 3, 3020–3033 (2019)

    2019

  140. [148]

    Xu, X. et al. Single-Junction Polymer Solar Cells with 16.35% Efficiency Enabled by a Platinum(II) Complexation Strategy. Adv. Mater. 31, 1–7 (2019)

    2019

  141. [149]

    Hong, L. et al. Eco-Compatible Solvent-Processed Organic Photovoltaic Cells with Over 16% Efficiency. Adv. Mater. 31, 1–7 (2019)

    2019

  142. [150]

    Sun, H. et al. A Narrow-Bandgap n-Type Polymer with an Acceptor – Acceptor Backbone Enabling Efficient All-Polymer Solar Cells. 2004183, 1–6 (2020)

    2020

  143. [151]

    Yang, J. et al. Introducing Fluorine and Sulfur Atoms into Quinoxaline-Based p-type Polymers to Gradually Improve the Performance of Fullerene-Free Organic Solar Cells. ACS Macro Lett. 8, 743–748 (2019)

    2019

  144. [152]

    Zhou, Z. et al. Subtle Molecular Tailoring Induces Significant Morphology Optimization Enabling over 16% Efficiency Organic Solar Cells with Efficient Charge Generation. Adv. Mater. 1906324 (2019) doi:10.1002/adma.201906324

    2019 doi

  145. [153]

    Li, C. et al. Non-fullerene acceptors with branched side chains and improved molecular packing to exceed 18% efficiency in organic solar cells. Nat. Energy 6, 605–613 (2021)

    2021

  146. [154]

    Wang, Y. et al. Optical Gaps of Organic Solar Cells as a Reference for Comparing Voltage Losses. Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1801352 (2018)

    2018

  147. [155]

    & Kemerink, M

    Felekidis, N., Melianas, A. & Kemerink, M. Automated open-source software for charge transport analysis in single-carrier organic semiconductor diodes. Org. Electron. 61, 318–328 (2018)

    2018

  148. [156]

    F., Hoke, E

    Burkhard, G. F., Hoke, E. T. & McGehee, M. D. Accounting for Interference, Scattering, and Electrode Absorption to Make Accurate Internal Quantum Efficiency Measurements in Organic and Other Thin Solar Cells. Adv. Mater. 22, 3293–3297 (2010)

    2010

  149. [157]

    Veldman, D. et al. Compositional and electric field dependence of the dissociation of charge transfer excitons in alternating polyfluorene copolymer/fullerene blends. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 7721–7735 (2008)

    2008

  150. [158]

    Andersson, L. M. et al. Mobility and fill factor correlation in geminate recombination limited solar cells. J. Appl. Phys. 110, 1–7 (2011)

    2011

  151. [159]

    & Iimori, T

    Islam, A., Syundo, K. & Iimori, T. Charge-transfer state and state mixing in tetracyanoquinodimethane probed using electroabsorption spectroscopy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 25, 21317–21323 (2023)

    2023

  152. [160]

    Wang, F. et al. Exciton polarizability in semiconductor nanocrystals. Nat. Mater. 5, 861–864 (2006)

    2006

  153. [161]

    M., Kupgan, G., Brédas, J.-L

    Pratik, S. M., Kupgan, G., Brédas, J.-L. & Coropceanu, V. Analysis of the charge generation and recombination processes in the PM6:Y6 organic solar cell. Energy Environ. Sci. 18, 841–852 (2025)

    2025

  154. [162]

    Zhong, Y. et al. Sub-picosecond charge-transfer at near-zero driving force in polymer:non-fullerene acceptor blends and bilayers. Nat. Commun. 11, 833 (2020)

    2020

  155. [163]

    Pan, Q.-Q. et al. Exploring what prompts ITIC to become a superior acceptor in organic solar cell by combining molecular dynamics simulation with quantum chemistry calculation. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19, 31227–31235 (2017)

    2017

  156. [164]

    & Neher, D

    Teschner, P., Shukla, A. & Neher, D. A combined diffusion/rate equation model to describe charge generation in phase-separated donor-acceptor blends. (2024). Acknowledgement The authors thank O. Inganäs, J. Hou, J. Durrant, N. Jain, R. Zhang, X. Zhou, D. Qian and Y. Wang for i...

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.