Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 161 references

Sound Mode and Scale-Dependent Growth in Two-Fluid Dynamical Dark Energy

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-07-15 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Two-fluid dynamical dark energy supports sound waves that imprint a detectable scale dependence on matter growth and galaxy bias.

desk verdict Solid multi-tracer P+B forecast for DESI-calibrated two-fluid DDE sound modes; SNRs optimistic without neutrino marginalization, but qualitative need for bispectrum holds. read the letter →

arxiv 2603.05049 v2 pith:VX6FQZLH submitted 2026-03-05 astro-ph.CO

Frans van Die , Vincent Desjacques This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.CO
keywords dynamicaldarkenergytwo-fluidmodelsoundmodescale-dependentbiasmulti-tracerbispectrumphantomdividegravitationaldrag
topics Dark Energy
open problems Dark Energy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether dynamical dark energy, if real, can be tested not only through its background expansion but through its own fluctuations. It models dark energy as two effective fluids so the total equation of state can cross the phantom divide smoothly, in line with recent DESI-type results. Those fluids support sound-like modes that change how matter grows on different scales and how halos and galaxies are biased. A multi-tracer Fisher forecast shows that combining the galaxy power spectrum with the bispectrum is essential: for a survey of volume about 10 cubic gigaparsecs at redshift 0.5 to 1, the scale dependence is detectable when the fluid sound speeds squared lie between roughly 10^{-2} and 10^{-4}. Still lower sound speeds would drag cluster-sized halos enough to shift growth-rate measurements at the 10 percent level. The result therefore supplies a concrete observational path to confirm or limit dynamical dark energy at the level of its fluctuations.

What carries the argument

The two-fluid dynamical dark energy model: two effective fluids with constant equations of state w± and rest-frame sound speeds ĉ± whose combination yields a total equation of state that crosses w = −1 without singularities. Their Jeans scales set the scale-dependent growth D(k) and the separate-universe / local-Lagrangian scale-dependent bias that enter the multi-tracer P+B Fisher forecast.

What would settle it

A two-tracer power-spectrum plus bispectrum analysis of a ~10 h^{-3} Gpc^{3} galaxy survey at z ≈ 0.5–1 that finds no residual scale-dependent bias (after neutrinos) at the amplitude predicted for c_s^{2} ~ 10^{-3}, or cluster peculiar-velocity data that show no mass-dependent ~10% shift in fσ₈ when one sound speed approaches 10^{-5}.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In an effective two-fluid description of dynamical dark energy that allows a smooth phantom crossing, the dark-energy components support propagating sound modes. These modes induce a scale dependence in the linear growth of matter fluctuations and in halo bias, with an amplitude for cluster-sized halos comparable to that from massless neutrinos in ΛCDM. A Fisher forecast for a two-tracer analysis of the power spectrum and bispectrum shows that bispectrum information is essential; for a survey volume V ~ 10 h^{-3} Gpc^{3} at z = 0.5–1 the scale dependence is detectable when the sound speeds satisfy c_s^{2} ~ 10^{-2}–10^{-4}. Lower sound speeds produce a gravitational drag that can alter growt

Load-bearing premise

Dark energy is treated as two fluids with fixed equations of state and fixed sound speeds, plus non-adiabatic pressure terms chosen only to keep those speeds positive and allow phantom crossing.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Bispectrum measurements of multiple tracers become essential for detecting dark-energy sound modes in forthcoming surveys of this volume.
  • Cluster-sized samples with number density ~10^{-4} h^{3} Mpc^{-3} and bias ~3–3.5 can reach SNR of a few for c_s^{2} in the 10^{-2}–10^{-4} window.
  • Sound speeds as low as ~10^{-5} would produce a ~10% shift in fσ₈ inferred from cluster peculiar velocities.
  • Optimal mass weighting of tracers can extend sensitivity to larger sound speeds (c_s^{2} > 10^{-2}).
  • The sign of the scale dependence distinguishes thawing (phantom) from freezing (quintom) crossing directions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If DESI-like background evidence holds, a null result on scale-dependent bias at the forecasted level would push the model toward high sound speeds or non-negligible anisotropic stress not included here.
  • Degeneracy with neutrino-induced scale dependence can be partially broken by multi-redshift measurements, because the dark-energy effect peaks near the phantom-crossing epoch.
  • The same multi-tracer P+B pipeline is a practical search for any sub-horizon sound horizon in the dark sector, independent of the two-fluid microphysics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper models dynamical dark energy that can cross the phantom divide with two effective fluids of constant equations of state w± and constant rest-frame sound speeds ĉ±. It solves the linear growth equations and spherical-collapse dynamics to obtain a scale-dependent growth factor D(k) and halo bias b1(k) around the Jeans scales k± = H/ĉ±. Separate-universe and local-Lagrangian calculations are compared; the latter overestimates the former by ~50 %. A tree-level multi-tracer Fisher forecast for the power spectrum and bispectrum of two galaxy samples (volume ~10 h^{-3} Gpc^{3} at z = 0.5–1) is used to claim that the scale dependence is detectable for ĉ^{2} ~ 10^{-2}–10^{-4} once bispectrum information is included. A secondary calculation estimates the dynamical-friction drag exerted by the sound wakes on cluster-mass halos and shows that it can shift f_eff σ_{8} by ~10 % only for extremely low sound speeds ~10^{-5}.

Significance. If the quantitative forecasts hold, the work supplies a concrete, observationally accessible signature of dark-energy fluctuations that is complementary to background equation-of-state constraints from DESI. The demonstration that bispectrum information is essential, the explicit comparison of separate-universe versus local-Lagrangian bias, and the order-of-magnitude estimate of gravitational drag are useful additions to the literature on clustering dark energy. The two-fluid construction itself is an effective description rather than a fundamental model, but it is sufficient to illustrate the phenomenology in a largely model-independent way.

major comments (3)
  1. §III.D.2 (Eqs. 44–46 and the three-parameter set {b1↓^a, b1↓^b, A}): the Fisher matrix freezes the shape and amplitude of the reference power spectrum PL(k) and does not marginalize over parameters that produce similar scale-dependent growth (most notably Σ m u, but also As and Ωm). The paper itself notes that the amplitude of Δb/b for M ~ 10^{14} M⊙/h is comparable to that of massless neutrinos. Consequently the SNRs reported in Figs. 7–8 are optimistic upper bounds; a realistic forecast must enlarge the parameter space or demonstrate that the degeneracy can be broken by the multi-tracer + bispectrum combination.
  2. The same Fisher analysis is performed in real space and omits redshift-space distortion kernels. Because the growth-rate factor f multiplies the same scale-dependent D(k) that enters the bias, RSD will entangle the signal with the very quantity one wishes to measure. At minimum the paper should quantify how the inclusion of the Kaiser factor (or a simple multipole expansion) degrades the SNR for A.
  3. §IV and Fig. 9: the dynamical-friction calculation treats the two fluids as ideal media with constant sound speeds and neglects anisotropic stress. While the order-of-magnitude estimate is useful, the claim that ĉ^{2} ~ 10^{-5} is an “effective lower bound” rests on this idealization; a short discussion of how non-zero anisotropic stress or time-dependent sound speeds would alter the drag force is needed before the bound can be taken at face value.
minor comments (4)
  1. Fig. 5 caption and surrounding text: the local-Lagrangian curves are said to overestimate the SU result by ~50 %, yet the vertical scale of the figure makes the difference appear smaller at high k; a short quantitative statement in the caption would help.
  2. Eq. (15) and Table I: the power-law index p = 0.1 is introduced to suppress higher derivatives of w(a), but no sensitivity test to p is shown. A one-sentence remark on how Δb/b changes when p is varied would strengthen the claim that the results are robust.
  3. Appendix A: the covariance matrices are written for the Gaussian approximation only. A brief note that non-Gaussian contributions are neglected (and that they would further reduce the SNR) would be appropriate.
  4. Several figures (especially Figs. 7–8) use “â” for the sound-speed symbols; consistent LaTeX notation throughout would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: scale-dependent growth/bias and Fisher SNRs are derived from the two-fluid equations and external benchmarks, not forced by construction or self-citation.

full rationale

The two-fluid DDE model (w±, ĉ±, δn, ϵn) is taken from Hu (2005) and calibrated to external DESI+CMB+DESY5 or Planck values (Table I, Eqs. 5–15); sound speeds are free parameters scanned over a motivated range. Linear growth D(k,z) follows from the sub-horizon fluid equations (16)–(20) with adiabatic initial conditions; scale-dependent bias b1(k) is obtained independently via separate-universe spherical collapse (21)–(24) or the local-Lagrangian map (25)–(29). The Fisher forecast freezes the shape/amplitude of a reference PL(k) and varies only {b1↓^a, b1↓^b, A}, where A multiplies the pre-computed functions f1(k), f2(k) derived from those equations; SNR ≡ 1/σ_A therefore measures detectability of an independently calculated scale dependence, not a quantity fitted to the same data. Gravitational-drag estimates use the external Ostriker (1999) subsonic force and EPS mass histories. No self-definitional loop, fitted-input-as-prediction, load-bearing self-citation, uniqueness import, or ansatz smuggling appears in the derivation chain. Forecast optimism (frozen PL, omitted neutrino degeneracies) is a modeling limitation, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claims rest on an effective two-fluid description of DDE, standard linear cosmological perturbation theory, the separate-universe spherical-collapse model, tree-level multi-tracer Fisher forecasting, and a subsonic dynamical-friction formula. Free parameters are the sound speeds and the CPL-like background parameters fixed to DESI/Planck. No new fundamental entities are introduced; the two fluids are an effective bookkeeping device.

free parameters (4)
  • ĉ± (sound speeds of the two DE fluids) = scanned 10^{-5}–10^{-2}
    Scanned over 10^{-5}–10^{-2}; the detection claims and drag amplitude depend directly on their values. Not fixed by data.
  • w0, wa (CPL parameters) = Phantom: w0=-0.752, wa=-0.86; Quintom: w0=-1.15, wa=0.5
    Fixed to DESI+CMB+DESY5 best-fit for the Phantom model and to a representative freezing value for the Quintom model; they set the background expansion and the relative energy densities of the two fluids.
  • an, p (normalization epoch and power-law index for εn) = an=0.75, p=0.1
    Chosen by hand (an=0.75, p=0.1) to satisfy the conditions of Hu (2005) and to mitigate higher derivatives of w(a).
  • survey volume Vs, kmax, number densities, bias values = Vs~10 h^{-3} Gpc^{3}, kmax=0.1 h Mpc^{-1}
    Assumed Vs=10–20 h^{-3} Gpc^{3}, kmax=0.1 h Mpc^{-1}, and threshold samples with b1↓ matched to Tinker mass function; they control the forecasted SNR.
assumptions (5)
  • ad hoc to paper Two effective fluids with constant w± and constant rest-frame sound speeds ĉ± can describe a total dark-energy component that smoothly crosses w=−1 without singularities.
    Adopted from Hu (2005) and Fang et al.; used throughout §§II–IV. Not derived from a fundamental Lagrangian.
  • domain assumption Anisotropic stress of both DE fluids is negligible (Π±≈0), so Φ=Ψ on sub-horizon scales.
    Stated in §III.A; closes the system of equations for the gravitational potential.
  • domain assumption Linear theory and tree-level bias expansion remain valid up to kmax=0.1 h Mpc^{-1}; redshift-space distortions and P–B cross-covariance can be neglected for the forecast.
    Explicitly adopted in §III.D for the Fisher calculation.
  • domain assumption Halo mass function and bias follow the Tinker et al. (2010) fitting formulae; quadratic and tidal bias are related to linear bias by the co-evolution and Lazeyras et al. relations.
    Used to convert number density into bias and to close the bispectrum kernels (Eqs. 41–43).
  • domain assumption Subsonic dynamical friction force on a point-mass perturber in an ideal fluid is given by Ostriker’s formula with I±≈(1/3)(v/ĉ±)^{3}.
    Invoked in §IV and Appendix B; finite-size corrections are argued to be negligible.
invented entities (1)
  • Two-fluid effective DDE (Phantom and Quintom realizations)
    purpose: Provide a singularity-free description of phantom-crossing dark energy that supports propagating sound modes.
    The two fluids are bookkeeping devices, not fundamental fields; only the total energy density is required to be positive. No independent collider or laboratory handle is claimed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Sound Mode and Scale-Dependent Growth in Two-Fluid Dynamical Dark Energy." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VX6FQZLH

@misc{pith2026260305049,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Sound Mode and Scale-Dependent Growth in Two-Fluid Dynamical Dark Energy},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VX6FQZLH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2603.05049}
}
abstract

We investigate the effects of dynamical dark energy (DDE) on the growth of cosmic structure using a two-fluid model. This framework allows the dark energy equation of state to smoothly cross the phantom divide, in agreement with recent DESI results. In this effective description, DDE supports propagating perturbations that behave like sound waves. These perturbations induce a scale dependence in the growth of matter fluctuations and in halo bias, which can be exploited to test the dynamical nature of dark energy at the level of its fluctuations. For cluster-sized halos, the amplitude of the scale-dependent halo bias is comparable to that produced by massless neutrinos in $\Lambda$CDM. Using a Fisher forecast for a multi-tracer analysis of the power spectrum (P) and bispectrum (B) of galaxy number counts, we find that bispectrum information is essential to detect the scale dependence induced by the DDE sound mode. For a survey of volume $V\sim 10\, h^{-3}{\rm Gpc}^3$ at redshift $z=0.5 - 1$, a two-tracer P+B analysis could detect this scale dependence if the sound speeds of the dark energy fluids are in the range $c_s^2\sim 10^{-2} - 10^{-4}$. Lower sound speeds cause halos to experience a gravitational drag force through the excitations of sound waves. This effect impacts measurements of the growth rate inferred from cluster-sized halos at the 10\% level if one of the fluids has a very low sound speed $c_s^2\sim 10^{-5}$. Larger sound speeds $c_s^2 > 10^{-2}$ could be probed with optimal weighting schemes that reduce shot noise and increase the effective bias.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

161 extracted references · 113 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    so that the gravitational (Bardeen) potentials satisfy Φ = Ψ (e.g. [85]). Furthermore, we shall ignore the metric perturbations induced by the components of the stress-energy tensor other than matter and DE. On the sub-horizon scalesk/H ≫1 of interest here, the equa- 5 tion governing the growth of linear matter perturbation reduces to d2δm d lna2 + � 1 + ...

  2. [2]

    Separate universe approach The separate universe (SU) technique [86–90] can pro- vide accurate predictions for the scale-dependent bias in- duced by the scale-dependent growth of matter fluctua- tions. Following [84, 91], the scale-dependent linear bias of DM halos at the collapse redshiftzis given by b1(z, M, k) = 1−b L 1 (z, M) dδc dδm (21) where the cr...

  3. [3]

    (25) to calculate the scale-dependent bias

    Local Lagrangian bias approximation Alternatively, we follow [82, 83] and assume that the linear order Lagrangian and matter density fields satisfy a scale-independent relation δL h (zi,�) =b L 1 (zi, M)δ m(zi,�) +. . .(25) to calculate the scale-dependent bias. This approxi- mation provides a fast estimate of the late-time scale- dependent bias because t...

  4. [4]

    Theoretical predictions In Fig. 5, we plot the fractional deviation ∆b b = b1(z, M, k) 1 +b L 1 (z, M) −1 (30) from a scale-independent bias predicted by the SU ap- proach (filled circles with a thin interpolating line) and the local Lagrangian approximation (thick curves) for two of the models shown in Fig. 4. We assume a halo massM= 10 14 M⊙/�(correspon...

  5. [5]

    Single tracer We consider first the detectability of the scale- dependence in measurements of the power spectrum of a single galaxy sample. We assume linear theory, ig- nore redshift-space distortions and consider the model (we omit the redshift dependence hereafter to avoid clut- ter) Pg(k)≡b 2 1(k)D2(k)PL(k) + 1 ¯ng (32) whereP L(k) is a reference (ΛCDM...

  6. [6]

    Furthermore, the scale-dependence induced by the sound mode is also present in the bispectrum owing to its dependence on the galaxy bias parameters

    Multiple tracers By comparing differently biased tracers of the same surveyed volume, multi-tracer analyses can partly alle- viate the limitation brought by cosmic variance and im- prove the detection level of scale-dependent features [99– 106]. Furthermore, the scale-dependence induced by the sound mode is also present in the bispectrum owing to its depe...

  7. [7]

    under the assumption that each halo host exactly one surveyed (central) galaxy, whereas the second sam- ple ”�” has number density ¯nb = 0.01� 3Mpc−3 and bias b(b) 1↓ = 1 as in Fig. 7. In this case the plotted range of ¯na corresponds to a range in minimal massM min of 1010.5 −10 13.5 M⊙/�, from right to left. The maxi- mum wavenumber isk max = 0.1�Mpc −1...

  8. [8]

    Finite size effects Since DM halos are extended objects, the point-like approximation for the computation of the friction coeffi- cient may not hold. The correction caused by the finite size of the DM halo enters the Fourier transform of the halo density, ρh(ω,�) = � dη � d3x ρh(η,�)e −i�·�+iωη (B1) = � dη a(η)−3M(η)u(k, η)e −i�·� � (η)+iωη , through the ...

Show all 161 references
  1. [9]

    Concretely, we assume a redshift-dependent halo mass M(z) =M 0(1 +z) αeβz (B2) whereM 0 is the present-day halo mass

    Mass accretion history We include the average mass accretion history of DM halos following the approach of [136] based on the ex- tended Press-Schechter (EPS) formalism (see also [137– 139]). Concretely, we assume a redshift-dependent halo mass M(z) =M 0(1 +z) αeβz (B2) whereM...

  2. [10]

    R. R. Caldwell, R. Dave, and P. J. Steinhardt, Cosmo- logical Imprint of an Energy Component with General Equation of State, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 1582 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9708069 [astro-ph]

    1998 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Zlatev, L

    I. Zlatev, L. Wang, and P. J. Steinhardt, Quintessence, cosmic coincidence, and the cosmological constant, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 896 (1999), arXiv:astro- ph/9807002

    1999

  4. [12]

    Ratra and P

    B. Ratra and P. J. E. Peebles, Cosmological conse- quences of a rolling homogeneous scalar field, Phys. Rev. D37, 3406 (1988)

    1988

  5. [13]

    J. A. Frieman, C. T. Hill, A. Stebbins, and I. Waga, Cosmology with Ultralight Pseudo Nambu-Goldstone Bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 2077 (1995), arXiv:astro- ph/9505060 [astro-ph]

  6. [14]

    J. K. Erickson, R. R. Caldwell, P. J. Steinhardt, C. Armendariz-Picon, and V. Mukhanov, Measuring the Speed of Sound of Quintessence, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 121301 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0112438 [astro-ph]

    2002 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Armendariz-Picon, T

    C. Armendariz-Picon, T. Damour, and V. F. Mukhanov, k - inflation, Phys. Lett. B458, 209 (1999), arXiv:hep- th/9904075

    1999

  8. [16]

    Armendariz-Picon, V

    C. Armendariz-Picon, V. F. Mukhanov, and P. J. Stein- hardt, A Dynamical solution to the problem of a small cosmological constant and late time cosmic accelera- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 4438 (2000), arXiv:astro- ph/0004134

    2000

  9. [17]

    Arkani-Hamed, P

    N. Arkani-Hamed, P. Creminelli, S. Mukohyama, and M. Zaldarriaga, Ghost inflation, JCAP2004, 001 (2004), arXiv:hep-th/0312100 [hep-th]

    2004 arXiv

  10. [18]

    E. A. Lim, I. Sawicki, and A. Vikman, Dust of dark en- ergy, JCAP2010, 012 (2010), arXiv:1003.5751 [astro- ph.CO]

    2010 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Kunz, The phenomenological approach to model- ing the dark energy, Comptes Rendus Physique13, 539 (2012), arXiv:1204.5482 [astro-ph.CO]

    M. Kunz, The phenomenological approach to model- ing the dark energy, Comptes Rendus Physique13, 539 (2012), arXiv:1204.5482 [astro-ph.CO]

    2012 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Tamayo, E

    D. Tamayo, E. Urquilla, and I. G´ omez-Vargas, Equiv- alence of dark energy models: A theoretical and Bayesian perspective, Phys. Dark Univ.48, 101901 (2025), arXiv:2502.12915 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025 arXiv

  13. [22]

    M. S. Linton, A. Pourtsidou, R. Crittenden, and R. Maartens, Variable sound speed in interacting dark energy models, JCAP04, 043, arXiv:1711.05196 [astro- ph.CO]

    arXiv

  14. [23]

    Hassani, J

    F. Hassani, J. Adamek, M. Kunz, and F. Vernizzi, k-evolution: a relativistic N-body code for clustering dark energy, JCAP2019, 011 (2019), arXiv:1910.01104 [astro-ph.CO]

    2019 arXiv

  15. [24]

    Hassani, J

    F. Hassani, J. Adamek, R. Durrer, and M. Kunz, Bi- ased tracers as a probe of beyond-ΛCDM cosmologies, Astron. Astrophys.668, A56 (2022), arXiv:2206.14179 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  16. [25]

    Ishiyama, F

    T. Ishiyama, F. Prada, and A. A. Klypin, Evolu- tion of clustering in cosmological models with time- varying dark energy, Phys. Rev. D112, 043504 (2025), arXiv:2503.19352 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025 arXiv

  17. [26]

    R. Neomenko, Constraints on the interaction strength in the model of interacting dynamical dark energy with linear and non-linear interacting terms, (2024), arXiv:2412.20551 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024

  18. [27]

    D’Amico, Y

    G. D’Amico, Y. Donath, L. Senatore, and P. Zhang, Limits on clustering and smooth quintessence from the EFTofLSS, JCAP03, 032, arXiv:2012.07554 [astro- ph.CO]

    2012 arXiv

  19. [28]

    P. Wu, M. Zhang, and S.-J. Jin, How Dark Sector Equa- tions of State Govern Interaction Signatures, (2025), arXiv:2512.05548 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025

  20. [29]

    Y. Zhai, M. de Cesare, C. van de Bruck, E. Di Valentino, and E. Wilson-Ewing, A low-redshift preference for an interacting dark energy model, JCAP11, 010, arXiv:2503.15659 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  21. [30]

    A. G. Adameet al.(DESI), DESI 2024 VII: cosmological constraints from the full-shape modeling of clustering measurements, JCAP07, 028, arXiv:2411.12022 [astro- ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  22. [31]

    A. G. Adameet al.(DESI), DESI 2024 VI: cosmologi- cal constraints from the measurements of baryon acous- tic oscillations, JCAP02, 021, arXiv:2404.03002 [astro- ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  23. [32]

    Abdul Karimet al.(DESI), DESI DR2 results

    M. Abdul Karimet al.(DESI), DESI DR2 results. II. Measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and cos- mological constraints, Phys. Rev. D112, 083515 (2025), arXiv:2503.14738 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025 arXiv

  24. [33]

    Garcia-Quinteroet al.(DESI), Cosmological impli- cations of DESI DR2 BAO measurements in light of the latest ACT DR6 CMB data, Phys

    C. Garcia-Quinteroet al.(DESI), Cosmological impli- cations of DESI DR2 BAO measurements in light of the latest ACT DR6 CMB data, Phys. Rev. D112, 083529 (2025), arXiv:2504.18464 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025 arXiv

  25. [34]

    Wang and D

    D. Wang and D. Mota, Did DESI DR2 truly reveal dy- namical dark energy?, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 1356 (2025), arXiv:2504.15222 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025

  26. [35]

    E. M. Teixeira, W. Giar` e, N. B. Hogg, T. Montan- don, A. Poudou, and V. Poulin, Implications of dis- 17 tance duality violation for the H0 tension and evolv- ing dark energy, Phys. Rev. D112, 023515 (2025), arXiv:2504.10464 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025 arXiv

  27. [36]

    Capozziello, H

    S. Capozziello, H. Chaudhary, T. Harko, and G. Mustafa, Is dark energy dynamical in the DESI era? A critical review, Phys. Dark Univ.51, 102196 (2026), arXiv:2512.10585 [astro-ph.CO]

    2026

  28. [37]

    M. W. Toomey, G. Montefalcone, E. McDonough, and K. Freese, How Theory-Informed Priors Affect DESI Evidence for Evolving Dark Energy, (2025), arXiv:2509.13318 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025

  29. [38]

    Chevallier and D

    M. Chevallier and D. Polarski, Accelerating universes with scaling dark matter, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D10, 213 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0009008

    2001 arXiv

  30. [39]

    E. V. Linder, Exploring the expansion history of the uni- verse, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 091301 (2003), arXiv:astro- ph/0208512

    2003

  31. [40]

    Nesseris, Y

    S. Nesseris, Y. Akrami, and G. D. Starkman, To CPL, or not to CPL? What we have not learned about the dark energy equation of state, (2025), arXiv:2503.22529 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025 arXiv

  32. [41]

    A. N. Ormondroyd, W. J. Handley, M. P. Hobson, and A. N. Lasenby, Non-parametric reconstructions of dy- namical dark energy via flexknots, Mon. Not. Roy. As- tron. Soc.541, 3388 (2025), arXiv:2503.08658 [astro- ph.CO]

    2025 arXiv

  33. [42]

    Giar` e, T

    W. Giar` e, T. Mahassen, E. Di Valentino, and S. Pan, An overview of what current data can (and cannot yet) say about evolving dark energy, Phys. Dark Univ.48, 101906 (2025), arXiv:2502.10264 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025 arXiv

  34. [43]

    Shlivko, P

    D. Shlivko, P. J. Steinhardt, and C. L. Steinhardt, Op- timal parameterizations for observational constraints on thawing dark energy, (2025), arXiv:2504.02028 [astro- ph.CO]

    2025 arXiv

  35. [44]

    Artola, I

    M. Artola, I. Ayuso, R. Lazkoz, and V. Salzano, Is Chevallier-Polarski-Linder dark energy a mirage?, Phys. Rev. D113, 023513 (2026), arXiv:2510.04191 [astro- ph.CO]

    2026

  36. [45]

    Lodhaet al.(DESI), Extended dark energy analy- sis using DESI DR2 BAO measurements, Phys

    K. Lodhaet al.(DESI), Extended dark energy analy- sis using DESI DR2 BAO measurements, Phys. Rev. D 112, 083511 (2025), arXiv:2503.14743 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025 arXiv

  37. [46]

    R. E. Keeley, K. N. Abazajian, M. Kaplinghat, and A. Shafieloo, Preference for evolving dark energy from cosmological distance measurements and possible signa- tures in the growth rate of perturbations, Phys. Rev. D 112, 043501 (2025), arXiv:2502.12667 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025 arXiv

  38. [47]

    Roy, Dynamical dark energy in the light of DESI 2024 data, Phys

    N. Roy, Dynamical dark energy in the light of DESI 2024 data, Phys. Dark Univ.48, 101912 (2025), arXiv:2406.00634 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  39. [48]

    Berti, E

    M. Berti, E. Bellini, C. Bonvin, M. Kunz, M. Viel, and M. Zumalacarregui, Reconstructing the dark energy density in light of DESI BAO observations, Phys. Rev. D112, 023518 (2025), arXiv:2503.13198 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025 arXiv

  40. [49]

    Bansal and D

    P. Bansal and D. Huterer, Expansion-history prefer- ences of DESI DR2 and external data, Phys. Rev. D 112, 023528 (2025), arXiv:2502.07185 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025

  41. [50]

    A. J. Shajib and J. A. Frieman, Scalar-field dark energy models: Current and forecast constraints, Phys. Rev. D 112, 063508 (2025), arXiv:2502.06929 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025 arXiv

  42. [51]

    G. Guet al., Dynamical dark energy in light of the DESI DR2 baryonic acoustic oscillations measurements, Nature Astronomy 10.1038/s41550-025-02669-6 (2025), arXiv:2504.06118 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025 doi

  43. [52]

    T. M. C. Abbottet al.(DES), Dark Energy Survey: implications for cosmological expansion models from the final DES Baryon Acoustic Oscillation and Supernova data, (2025), arXiv:2503.06712 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025

  44. [53]

    Mena-Fern´ andezet al.(DES), Dark Energy Sur- vey: DESI-Independent Angular BAO Measurement, (2026), arXiv:2601.14864 [astro-ph.CO]

    J. Mena-Fern´ andezet al.(DES), Dark Energy Sur- vey: DESI-Independent Angular BAO Measurement, (2026), arXiv:2601.14864 [astro-ph.CO]

    2026

  45. [54]

    Reischkeet al., KiDS-Legacy: Constraining dark energy, neutrino mass, and curvature, (2025), arXiv:2512.11041 [astro-ph.CO]

    R. Reischkeet al., KiDS-Legacy: Constraining dark energy, neutrino mass, and curvature, (2025), arXiv:2512.11041 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025 arXiv

  46. [55]

    S. Chen, M. M. Ivanov, O. H. E. Philcox, and L. Wenzl, Suppression without Thawing: Constraining Structure Formation and Dark Energy with Galaxy Clustering, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 231001 (2024), arXiv:2406.13388 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  47. [56]

    Chen and M

    S. Chen and M. M. Ivanov, Constraining dynamical dark energy from galaxy clustering with simulation- based priors, Phys. Rev. D112, 083562 (2025)

    2025

  48. [57]

    Silva and R

    E. Silva and R. C. Nunes, Testing signatures of phan- tom crossing through full-shape galaxy clustering anal- ysis, JCAP2025, 078 (2025), arXiv:2507.13989 [astro- ph.CO]

    2025

  49. [58]

    B. R. Dinda, R. Maartens, and C. Clarkson, Calibration-independent consistency test of DESI DR2 BAO and SNIa, JCAP12, 025, arXiv:2509.19899 [astro- ph.CO]

  50. [59]

    I. D. Gialamas, G. H¨ utsi, K. Kannike, A. Racioppi, M. Raidal, M. Vasar, and H. Veerm¨ ae, Interpreting DESI 2024 BAO: Late-time dynamical dark energy or a local effect?, Phys. Rev. D111, 043540 (2025), arXiv:2406.07533 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  51. [60]

    J. W. Moffat, Void and Density Walls Inhomo- geneous Cosmic Web And Dark Energy, (2025), arXiv:2503.20912 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025 arXiv

  52. [61]

    S. H. Mirpoorian, K. Jedamzik, and L. Pogosian, Is dy- namical dark energy necessary? DESI BAO and mod- ified recombination, JCAP12, 050, arXiv:2504.15274 [astro-ph.CO]

  53. [62]

    Camarena, K

    D. Camarena, K. Greene, J. Houghteling, and F.- Y. Cyr-Racine, Designing concordant distances in the age of precision cosmology: The impact of den- sity fluctuations, Phys. Rev. D112, 083526 (2025), arXiv:2507.17969 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025

  54. [63]

    Y. B. Ginat and P. G. Ferreira, Apparent Dark-Energy Evolution from Cosmic Inhomogeneities, (2026), arXiv:2601.20633 [astro-ph.CO]

    2026

  55. [64]

    Banik, H

    I. Banik, H. Desmond, V. Kalaitzidis, and S. Mazurenko, The local void model for the Hub- ble and BAO tensions, (2026), arXiv:2602.03928 [astro-ph.CO]

    2026

  56. [65]

    R. A. Battye and A. Moss, How isotropic is dark en- ergy?, (2026), arXiv:2601.22351 [astro-ph.CO]

    2026

  57. [66]

    F. B. M. d. Santos, J. Morais, S. Pan, W. Yang, and E. Di Valentino, A New Window on Dynamical Dark Energy: Combining DESI-DR2 BAO with future Grav- itational Wave Observations, (2025), arXiv:2504.04646 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025 arXiv

  58. [67]

    Garza, B

    D. Garza, B. Robertson, P. Madau, N. Gnedin, M. W. Abruzzo, R. D. Budiardja, R. Caddy, E. Schneider, J. B. White, III, and B. Villasenor, Dynamical Dark Energy Imprints in the Lyman-Alpha Forest, (2026), arXiv:2601.00767 [astro-ph.CO]

    2026

  59. [68]

    Guet al.(DESI), Dynamical dark energy in light of the DESI DR2 baryonic acoustic oscillations measure- ments, Nature Astron.9, 1879 (2025), [Erratum: Na- 18 ture Astron

    G. Guet al.(DESI), Dynamical dark energy in light of the DESI DR2 baryonic acoustic oscillations measure- ments, Nature Astron.9, 1879 (2025), [Erratum: Na- 18 ture Astron. 9, 1898 (2025)], arXiv:2504.06118 [astro- ph.CO]

    2025

  60. [69]

    W. Fang, W. Hu, and A. Lewis, Crossing the Phantom Divide with Parameterized Post-Friedmann Dark En- ergy, Phys. Rev. D78, 087303 (2008), arXiv:0808.3125 [astro-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  61. [70]

    Amendolaet al., Cosmology and fundamental physics with the Euclid satellite, Living Rev

    L. Amendolaet al., Cosmology and fundamental physics with the Euclid satellite, Living Rev. Rel.21, 2 (2018), arXiv:1606.00180 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018 arXiv

  62. [71]

    Kunz and D

    M. Kunz and D. Sapone, Crossing the Phantom Di- vide, Phys. Rev. D74, 123503 (2006), arXiv:astro- ph/0609040

    2006

  63. [72]

    Perrotta and C

    F. Perrotta and C. Baccigalupi, On the dark energy clustering properties, Phys. Rev. D65, 123505 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0201335

    2002 arXiv

  64. [73]

    de Putter and E

    R. de Putter and E. V. Linder, Kinetic k-essence and Quintessence, Astropart. Phys.28, 263 (2007), arXiv:0705.0400 [astro-ph]

    2007 arXiv

  65. [74]

    de Putter, D

    R. de Putter, D. Huterer, and E. V. Linder, Measuring the Speed of Dark: Detecting Dark Energy Perturba- tions, Phys. Rev. D81, 103513 (2010), arXiv:1002.1311 [astro-ph.CO]

    2010 arXiv

  66. [75]

    Calabrese, R

    E. Calabrese, R. de Putter, D. Huterer, E. V. Linder, and A. Melchiorri, Future CMB Constraints on Early, Cold, or Stressed Dark Energy, Phys. Rev. D83, 023011 (2011), arXiv:1010.5612 [astro-ph.CO]

    2011 arXiv

  67. [76]

    Gubitosi, F

    G. Gubitosi, F. Piazza, and F. Vernizzi, The Effec- tive Field Theory of Dark Energy, JCAP02, 032, arXiv:1210.0201 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  68. [77]

    Gleyzes, D

    J. Gleyzes, D. Langlois, F. Piazza, and F. Vernizzi, Es- sential Building Blocks of Dark Energy, JCAP08, 025, arXiv:1304.4840 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  69. [78]

    Hu, Crossing the phantom divide: Dark energy in- ternal degrees of freedom, Phys

    W. Hu, Crossing the phantom divide: Dark energy in- ternal degrees of freedom, Phys. Rev. D71, 047301 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0410680 [astro-ph]

    2005 arXiv

  70. [79]

    Lodhaet al.(DESI), DESI 2024: Constraints on physics-focused aspects of dark energy using DESI DR1 BAO data, Phys

    K. Lodhaet al.(DESI), DESI 2024: Constraints on physics-focused aspects of dark energy using DESI DR1 BAO data, Phys. Rev. D111, 023532 (2025), arXiv:2405.13588 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  71. [80]

    R. R. Caldwell and E. V. Linder, The Limits of quintessence, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 141301 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0505494

    2005 arXiv

  72. [81]

    Mehrabi, S

    A. Mehrabi, S. Basilakos, and F. Pace, How cluster- ing dark energy affects matter perturbations, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.452, 2930 (2015), arXiv:1504.01262 [astro-ph.CO]

    2015 arXiv

  73. [82]

    Kodama and M

    H. Kodama and M. Sasaki, Cosmological Perturbation Theory, Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement78, 1 (1984)

    1984

  74. [83]

    Aghanimet al.(Planck), Planck 2018 results

    N. Aghanimet al.(Planck), Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018 arXiv

  75. [84]

    R. R. Caldwell and E. V. Linder, Null Impact of the Null Energy Condition in Current Cosmology, (2025), arXiv:2511.07526 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025

  76. [85]

    Hu and R

    W. Hu and R. Scranton, Measuring dark energy clus- tering with CMB-galaxy correlations, Phys. Rev. D70, 123002 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0408456 [astro-ph]

    2004 arXiv

  77. [86]

    Bean and O

    R. Bean and O. Dor´ e, Probing dark energy perturba- tions: The dark energy equation of state and speed of sound as measured by WMAP, Phys. Rev. D69, 083503 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0307100 [astro-ph]

    2004 arXiv

  78. [87]

    Corasaniti, T

    P.-S. Corasaniti, T. Giannantonio, and A. Melchiorri, Constraining dark energy with cross-correlated CMB and large scale structure data, Phys. Rev. D71, 123521 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0504115

    2005 arXiv

  79. [88]

    R. C. Batista and V. Marra, Clustering dark energy and halo abundances, Journal of Cosmology and Astropar- ticle Physics2017(11), 048–048

  80. [89]

    Basse, O

    T. Basse, O. E. Bjælde, and Y. Y. Wong, Spherical collapse of dark energy with an arbitrary sound speed, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2011 (10), 038–038

  81. [90]

    J. B. Dent, S. Dutta, and L. Perivolaropoulos, New Parametrization for the Scale Dependent Growth Func- tion in General Relativity, Phys. Rev. D80, 023514 (2009), arXiv:0903.5296 [astro-ph.CO]

    2009 arXiv

  82. [91]

    Hui and K

    L. Hui and K. P. Parfrey, Evolution of galaxy bias, generalized, Phys. Rev. D77, 043527 (2008), arXiv:0712.1162 [astro-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  83. [92]

    Parfrey, L

    K. Parfrey, L. Hui, and R. K. Sheth, Scale-dependent halo bias from scale-dependent growth, Phys. Rev. D 83, 063511 (2011), arXiv:1012.1335 [astro-ph.CO]

    2011 arXiv

  84. [93]

    Chiang, Y

    C. Chiang, Y. Li, W. Hu, and M. LoVerde, Quintessen- tial scale dependence from separate universe simula- tions, Phys. Rev. D94, 123502 (2016), arXiv:1609.01701 [astro-ph.CO]

    2016 arXiv

  85. [94]

    Anselmi, G

    S. Anselmi, G. Ballesteros, and M. Pietroni, Non-linear dark energy clustering, JCAP11, 014, arXiv:1106.0834 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  86. [95]

    Sirko, Initial Conditions to Cosmological N-Body Simulations, or, How to Run an Ensemble of Sim- ulations, Astrophys

    E. Sirko, Initial Conditions to Cosmological N-Body Simulations, or, How to Run an Ensemble of Sim- ulations, Astrophys. J.634, 728 (2005), arXiv:astro- ph/0503106 [astro-ph]

    2005

  87. [96]

    N. Y. Gnedin, A. V. Kravtsov, and D. H. Rudd, Imple- menting the DC Mode in Cosmological Simulations with Supercomoving Variables, Astrophys. J. Supp.194, 46 (2011), arXiv:1104.1428 [astro-ph.CO]

    2011 arXiv

  88. [97]

    Y. Li, W. Hu, and M. Takada, Super-sample covari- ance in simulations, Phys. Rev. D89, 083519 (2014), arXiv:1401.0385 [astro-ph.CO]

    2014 arXiv

  89. [98]

    Wagner, F

    C. Wagner, F. Schmidt, C. T. Chiang, and E. Komatsu, Separate universe simulations., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.448, L11 (2015), arXiv:1409.6294 [astro-ph.CO]

    2015 arXiv

  90. [99]

    Lazeyras, C

    T. Lazeyras, C. Wagner, T. Baldauf, and F. Schmidt, Precision measurement of the local bias of dark mat- ter halos, JCAP2016, 018 (2016), arXiv:1511.01096 [astro-ph.CO]

    2016 arXiv

  91. [100]

    LoVerde, Halo bias in mixed dark matter cosmolo- gies, Phys

    M. LoVerde, Halo bias in mixed dark matter cosmolo- gies, Phys. Rev. D90, 083530 (2014), arXiv:1405.4855 [astro-ph.CO]

    2014 arXiv

  92. [101]

    Desjacques, M

    V. Desjacques, M. Crocce, R. Scoccimarro, and R. K. Sheth, Modeling scale-dependent bias on the baryonic acoustic scale with the statistics of peaks of Gaus- sian random fields, Phys. Rev. D82, 103529 (2010), arXiv:1009.3449 [astro-ph.CO]

    2010 arXiv

  93. [102]

    Nusser and M

    A. Nusser and M. Davis, On the Prediction of Velocity Fields from Redshift Space Galaxy Samples, Astrophys. J. Lett.421, L1 (1994), arXiv:astro-ph/9309009 [astro- ph]

    1994 arXiv

  94. [103]

    J. N. Fry, The Evolution of Bias, Astrophys. J. Lett. 461, L65 (1996)

    1996

  95. [104]

    H. J. Mo and S. D. M. White, An analytic model for the spatial clustering of dark matter haloes, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.282, 347 (1996), arXiv:astro-ph/9512127 [astro-ph]

    1996 arXiv

  96. [105]

    LoVerde, Neutrino mass without cosmic variance, 19 Phys

    M. LoVerde, Neutrino mass without cosmic variance, 19 Phys. Rev. D93, 103526 (2016), arXiv:1602.08108 [astro-ph.CO]

    2016 arXiv

  97. [106]

    J. B. Mu˜ noz and C. Dvorkin, Efficient computation of galaxy bias with neutrinos and other relics, Phys. Rev. D98, 043503 (2018), arXiv:1805.11623 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018 arXiv

  98. [107]

    Rogozenski, E

    P. Rogozenski, E. Krause, and V. Miranda, Model- ing neutrino-induced scale-dependent galaxy cluster- ing for photometric galaxy surveys, JCAP04, 076, arXiv:2310.07933 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  99. [108]

    Seljak, Extracting Primordial Non-Gaussianity with- out Cosmic Variance, Physical Review Letters102, 021302 (2009), arXiv:0807.1770

    U. Seljak, Extracting Primordial Non-Gaussianity with- out Cosmic Variance, Physical Review Letters102, 021302 (2009), arXiv:0807.1770

    2009 arXiv

  100. [109]

    McDonald and U

    P. McDonald and U. Seljak, How to evade the sample variance limit on measurements of redshift-space distor- tions, Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics 10, 7 (2009), arXiv:0810.0323

    2009 arXiv

  101. [110]

    Hamaus, U

    N. Hamaus, U. Seljak, V. Desjacques, R. E. Smith, and T. Baldauf, Minimizing the stochasticity of halos in large-scale structure surveys, Phys. Rev. D82, 043515 (2010), arXiv:1004.5377 [astro-ph.CO]

    2010 arXiv

  102. [111]

    Hamaus, U

    N. Hamaus, U. Seljak, and V. Desjacques, Optimal con- straints on local primordial non-Gaussianity from the two-point statistics of large-scale structure, Phys. Rev. D84, 083509 (2011), arXiv:1104.2321 [astro-ph.CO]

    2011 arXiv

  103. [112]

    Hamaus, U

    N. Hamaus, U. Seljak, and V. Desjacques, Optimal weighting in galaxy surveys: Application to redshift- space distortions, Phys. Rev. D86, 103513 (2012), arXiv:1207.1102 [astro-ph.CO]

    2012 arXiv

  104. [114]

    L. R. Abramo and K. E. Leonard, Why multitracer sur- veys beat cosmic variance, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 432, 318 (2013), arXiv:1302.5444 [astro-ph.CO]

    2013 arXiv

  105. [115]

    Yamauchi, K

    D. Yamauchi, K. Takahashi, and M. Oguri, Constrain- ing primordial non-Gaussianity via a multitracer tech- nique with surveys by Euclid and the Square Kilometre Array, Phys. Rev. D90, 083520 (2014), arXiv:1407.5453 [astro-ph.CO]

    2014 arXiv

  106. [116]

    Yamauchi, S

    D. Yamauchi, S. Yokoyama, and K. Takahashi, Multi- tracer technique for galaxy bispectrum: An application to constraints on nonlocal primordial non-Gaussianities, Phys. Rev. D95, 063530 (2017), arXiv:1611.03590 [astro-ph.CO]

    2017 arXiv

  107. [117]

    Karagiannis, R

    D. Karagiannis, R. Maartens, J. Fonseca, S. Cam- era, and C. Clarkson, Multi-tracer power spectra and bispectra: formalism, JCAP2024, 034 (2024), arXiv:2305.04028 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  108. [118]

    J. E. Pollack, R. E. Smith, and C. Porciani, Modelling large-scale halo bias using the bispectrum, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.420, 3469 (2012), arXiv:1109.3458 [astro- ph.CO]

    2012 arXiv

  109. [119]

    Schmidt, Towards a self-consistent halo model for the nonlinear large-scale structure, Phys

    F. Schmidt, Towards a self-consistent halo model for the nonlinear large-scale structure, Phys. Rev.D93, 063512 (2016), arXiv:1511.02231 [astro-ph.CO]

    2016 arXiv

  110. [120]

    K. C. Chan and L. Blot, Assessment of the information content of the power spectrum and bispectrum, Phys. Rev. D96, 023528 (2017), arXiv:1610.06585 [astro- ph.CO]

    2017 arXiv

  111. [121]

    Ginzburg, V

    D. Ginzburg, V. Desjacques, and K. C. Chan, Shot noise and biased tracers: A new look at the halo model, Phys. Rev. D96, 083528 (2017), arXiv:1706.08738 [astro- ph.CO]

    2017 arXiv

  112. [122]

    Bernardeau, S

    F. Bernardeau, S. Colombi, E. Gazta˜ naga, and R. Scoc- cimarro, Large-scale structure of the Universe and cosmological perturbation theory, Phys. Rep.367, 1 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0112551

    2002 arXiv

  113. [123]

    Desjacques, D

    V. Desjacques, D. Jeong, and F. Schmidt, Large-scale galaxy bias, Phys. Rep.733, 1 (2018), arXiv:1611.09787 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018 arXiv

  114. [124]

    Catelan, F

    P. Catelan, F. Lucchin, S. Matarrese, and C. Porciani, The bias field of dark matter haloes, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.297, 692 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9708067 [astro-ph]

    1998 arXiv

  115. [125]

    Catelan, C

    P. Catelan, C. Porciani, and M. Kamionkowski, Two ways of biasing galaxy formation, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.318, L39 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/0005544 [astro- ph]

    2000 arXiv

  116. [126]

    K. C. Chan, R. Scoccimarro, and R. K. Sheth, Gravity and large-scale nonlocal bias, Phys. Rev. D85, 083509 (2012), arXiv:1201.3614 [astro-ph.CO]

    2012 arXiv

  117. [127]

    Baldauf, U

    T. Baldauf, U. Seljak, V. Desjacques, and P. Mc- Donald, Evidence for quadratic tidal tensor bias from the halo bispectrum, Phys. Rev. D86, 083540 (2012), arXiv:1201.4827 [astro-ph.CO]

    2012 arXiv

  118. [128]

    R. K. Sheth, K. C. Chan, and R. Scoccimarro, Nonlo- cal Lagrangian bias, Phys. Rev. D87, 083002 (2013), arXiv:1207.7117 [astro-ph.CO]

    2013 arXiv

  119. [129]

    C. Modi, E. Castorina, and U. Seljak, Halo bias in Lagrangian space: estimators and theoretical predic- tions, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.472, 3959 (2017), arXiv:1612.01621 [astro-ph.CO]

    2017 arXiv

  120. [130]

    M. S. Vogeley and A. S. Szalay, Eigenmode Analysis of Galaxy Redshift Surveys. I. Theory and Methods, Astrophys. J.465, 34 (1996), arXiv:astro-ph/9601185 [astro-ph]

    1996 arXiv

  121. [131]

    Tegmark, A

    M. Tegmark, A. J. S. Hamilton, M. A. Strauss, M. S. Vogeley, and A. S. Szalay, Measuring the Galaxy Power Spectrum with Future Redshift Surveys, Astrophys. J. 499, 555 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9708020 [astro-ph]

    1998 arXiv

  122. [132]

    Y.-S. Song, A. Taruya, and A. Oka, Cosmology with anisotropic galaxy clustering from the combination of power spectrum and bispectrum, JCAP2015, 007 (2015), arXiv:1502.03099 [astro-ph.CO]

    2015 arXiv

  123. [133]

    Yankelevich and C

    V. Yankelevich and C. Porciani, Cosmological informa- tion in the redshift-space bispectrum, Mon. Not. R. As- tron. Soc.483, 2078 (2019), arXiv:1807.07076 [astro- ph.CO]

    arXiv

  124. [134]

    Scoccimarro, S

    R. Scoccimarro, S. Colombi, J. N. Fry, J. A. Frieman, E. Hivon, and A. Melott, Nonlinear Evolution of the Bispectrum of Cosmological Perturbations, Astrophys. J.496, 586 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9704075 [astro-ph]

    1998 arXiv

  125. [135]

    Sefusatti, M

    E. Sefusatti, M. Crocce, S. Pueblas, and R. Scocci- marro, Cosmology and the bispectrum, Phys. Rev. D 74, 023522 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0604505 [astro-ph]

    2006 arXiv

  126. [136]

    J. N. Fry, A. L. Melott, and S. F. Shandarin, The Three- Point Correlation Function in an Ensemble of Three- dimensional Simulations, Astrophys. J.412, 504 (1993)

    1993

  127. [137]

    Scoccimarro, E

    R. Scoccimarro, E. Sefusatti, and M. Zaldarriaga, Prob- ing primordial non-Gaussianity with large-scale struc- ture, Phys. Rev. D69, 103513 (2004), arXiv:astro- ph/0312286 [astro-ph]

    2004

  128. [138]

    Kaiser, On the spatial correlations of Abell clusters, Astrophys

    N. Kaiser, On the spatial correlations of Abell clusters, Astrophys. J. Lett.284, L9 (1984)

    1984

  129. [139]

    J. M. Bardeen, J. R. Bond, N. Kaiser, and A. S. Sza- lay, The Statistics of Peaks of Gaussian Random Fields, Astrophys. J.304, 15 (1986). 20

    1986

  130. [140]

    R. K. Sheth and G. Tormen, Large-scale bias and the peak background split, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.308, 119 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9901122

    1999 arXiv

  131. [141]

    J. L. Tinker, B. E. Robertson, A. V. Kravtsov, A. Klypin, M. S. Warren, G. Yepes, and S. Gottl¨ ober, The Large-scale Bias of Dark Matter Halos: Numerical Calibration and Model Tests, Astrophys. J.724, 878 (2010), arXiv:1001.3162 [astro-ph.CO]

    2010 arXiv

  132. [142]

    Seljak, N

    U. Seljak, N. Hamaus, and V. Desjacques, How to Sup- press the Shot Noise in Galaxy Surveys, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 091303 (2009), arXiv:0904.2963 [astro-ph.CO]

    2009 arXiv

  133. [143]

    J. A. Blazek, J. E. McEwen, and C. M. Hirata, Streaming Velocities and the Baryon Acoustic Oscil- lation Scale, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 121303 (2016), arXiv:1510.03554 [astro-ph.CO]

    2016 arXiv

  134. [144]

    Schmidt, Effect of relative velocity and density per- turbations between baryons and dark matter on the clustering of galaxies, Phys

    F. Schmidt, Effect of relative velocity and density per- turbations between baryons and dark matter on the clustering of galaxies, Phys. Rev. D94, 063508 (2016), arXiv:1602.09059 [astro-ph.CO]

    2016 arXiv

  135. [145]

    C. A. Correa, J. S. B. Wyithe, J. Schaye, and A. R. Duffy, The accretion history of dark matter haloes – I. The physical origin of the universal function, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.450, 1514 (2015), arXiv:1409.5228 [astro-ph.GA]

    2015 arXiv

  136. [146]

    D. Reed, J. Gardner, T. R. Quinn, J. Stadel, M. Fardal, G. Lake, and F. Governato, Evolution of the mass func- tion of dark matter haloes, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 346, 565 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0301270

    2003 arXiv

  137. [147]

    Genel, N

    S. Genel, N. Bouch´ e, T. Naab, A. Sternberg, and R. Genzel, The Growth of Dark Matter Halos: Evi- dence for Significant Smooth Accretion, Astrophys. J. 719, 229 (2010), arXiv:1005.4058 [astro-ph.CO]

    2010 arXiv

  138. [148]

    F. C. van den Bosch, F. Jiang, A. Hearin, D. Campbell, D. Watson, and N. Padmanabhan, Coming of age in the dark sector: how dark matter haloes grow their gravita- tional potential wells, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.445, 1713 (2014), arXiv:1409.2750 [astro-ph.GA]

    2014 arXiv

  139. [149]

    E. C. Ostriker, Dynamical friction in a gaseous medium, Astrophys. J.513, 252 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9810324

    1999 arXiv

  140. [150]

    S. Alamet al.(eBOSS), Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Cosmological implications from two decades of spectroscopic surveys at the Apache Point Observatory, Phys. Rev. D103, 083533 (2021), arXiv:2007.08991 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021 arXiv

  141. [151]

    Song and W

    Y. Song and W. J. Percival, Reconstructing the history of structure formation using Redshift Distortions, JCAP 10, 004, arXiv:0807.0810 [astro-ph]

    arXiv

  142. [152]

    Howlett, L

    C. Howlett, L. Staveley-Smith, P. J. Elahi, T. Hong, T. H. Jarrett, D. H. Jones, B. S. Koribalski, L. M. Macri, K. L. Masters, and C. M. Springob, 2MTF – VI. Measuring the velocity power spectrum, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.471, 3135 (2017), arXiv:1706.05130 [astro-ph.CO]

    2017 arXiv

  143. [153]

    Huterer, D

    D. Huterer, D. Shafer, D. Scolnic, and F. Schmidt, Testing ΛCDM at the lowest redshifts with SN Ia and galaxy velocities, JCAP05, 015, arXiv:1611.09862 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  144. [154]

    M. J. Hudson and S. J. Turnbull, The Growth Rate of Cosmic Structure from Peculiar Velocities at Low and High Redshifts, Astrophys. J. Lett.751, L30 (2012), arXiv:1203.4814 [astro-ph.CO]

    2012 arXiv

  145. [155]

    S. J. Turnbull, M. J. Hudson, H. A. Feldman, M. Hicken, R. P. Kirshner, and R. Watkins, Cosmic flows in the nearby universe from Type Ia supernovae, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.420, 447 (2012), arXiv:1111.0631 [astro- ph.CO]

    2012 arXiv

  146. [156]

    Davis, A

    M. Davis, A. Nusser, K. Masters, C. Springob, J. P. Huchra, and G. Lemson, Local Gravity versus Local Ve- locity: Solutions forβand nonlinear bias, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.413, 2906 (2011), arXiv:1011.3114 [astro-ph.CO]

    2011 arXiv

  147. [157]

    Blakeet al., Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): improved cosmic growth measurements using multiple tracers of large-scale structure, Mon

    C. Blakeet al., Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): improved cosmic growth measurements using multiple tracers of large-scale structure, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.436, 3089 (2013), arXiv:1309.5556 [astro-ph.CO]

    2013 arXiv

  148. [158]

    Blakeet al., The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: joint measurements of the expansion and growth history at z <1, Mon

    C. Blakeet al., The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: joint measurements of the expansion and growth history at z <1, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.425, 405 (2012), arXiv:1204.3674 [astro-ph.CO]

    2012 arXiv

  149. [159]

    A. Pezzottaet al., The VIMOS Public Extragalactic Redshift Survey (VIPERS): The growth of structure at 0.5< z <1.2 from redshift-space distortions in the clus- tering of the PDR-2 final sample, Astron. Astrophys. 604, A33 (2017), arXiv:1612.05645 [astro-ph.CO]

    2017 arXiv

  150. [160]

    Okumuraet al., The Subaru FMOS galaxy redshift survey (FastSound)

    T. Okumuraet al., The Subaru FMOS galaxy redshift survey (FastSound). IV. New constraint on gravity the- ory from redshift space distortions atz∼1.4, Publ. As- tron. Soc. Jap.68, 38 (2016), arXiv:1511.08083 [astro- ph.CO]

    2016 arXiv

  151. [161]

    G. Zhaoet al.(eBOSS), The clustering of the SDSS- IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey DR14 quasar sample: a tomographic measurement of cosmic structure growth and expansion rate based on optimal redshift weights, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 482, 3497 (2019), ar...

    2019 arXiv

  152. [162]

    J. E. Gunn and J. R. I. Gott, On the Infall of Matter Into Clusters of Galaxies and Some Effects on Their Evolution, Astrophys. J.176, 1 (1972)

    1972

  153. [163]

    J. R. Bond, S. Cole, G. Efstathiou, and N. Kaiser, Ex- cursion set mass functions for hierarchical Gaussian fluc- tuations, Astrophys. J.379, 440 (1991)

    1991

Pith tools

Reviewed July 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.