REVIEW 2 cited by
Robust Linear Regression: Phase-Transitions and Precise Tradeoffs for General Norms
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
In this paper, we investigate the impact of test-time adversarial attacks on linear regression models and determine the optimal level of robustness that any model can reach while maintaining a given level of standard predictive performance (accuracy). Through quantitative estimates, we uncover fundamental tradeoffs between adversarial robustness and accuracy in different regimes. We obtain a precise characterization which distinguishes between regimes where robustness is achievable without hurting standard accuracy and regimes where a tradeoff might be unavoidable. Our findings are empirically confirmed with simple experiments that represent a variety of settings. This work applies to feature covariance matrices and attack norms of any nature, and extends beyond previous works in this area.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
On the existence of consistent adversarial attacks in high-dimensional linear classification
The authors derive sharp high-dimensional formulas for consistent adversarial errors in linear classifiers and show overparameterization increases vulnerability on correctly classified points while decreasing the over...
-
The Fourth Quadrant: A Stylized View of Benign Misfitting
In a stylized single-spike linear model, useful span predictors in the window d/gamma^2 << n << d/gamma are forced to overshoot the training labels, so good test error comes together with large training error.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.