Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Capturing Label Distribution: A Case Study in NLI

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2102.06859 v1 pith:VYTZYVUU submitted 2021-02-13 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords labeldistributionaccuracyannotationcollectingmultiplereferencestraining
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We study estimating inherent human disagreement (annotation label distribution) in natural language inference task. Post-hoc smoothing of the predicted label distribution to match the expected label entropy is very effective. Such simple manipulation can reduce KL divergence by almost half, yet will not improve majority label prediction accuracy or learn label distributions. To this end, we introduce a small amount of examples with multiple references into training. We depart from the standard practice of collecting a single reference per each training example, and find that collecting multiple references can achieve better accuracy under the fixed annotation budget. Lastly, we provide rich analyses comparing these two methods for improving label distribution estimation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools