Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 78 references

Qualification pathways for Photonic Integrated Circuits in Astrophotonic Space Missions

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Scattered space-qualification rules for photonic chips can be consolidated into one seven-phase template, the paper argues.

desk verdict A useful consolidation of space-qualification flows for astrophotonic PICs; the PIC-SQT template and gap analysis are worth refereeing, but the passive-core radiation shortcut overextends its evidence. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.00834 v1 pith:VZNMWJ4H submitted 2026-08-01 astro-ph.IM physics.optics

Kalaga Madhav , Aashia Rahman , Máté Ádámkovics This is my paper
classification astro-ph.IMphysics.optics
keywords photonicintegratedcircuitsastrophotonicsspacequalificationradiationhardnessassuranceECSSGEVStechnologyreadinesslevelphotonics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Astrophotonic instruments—compact spectrographs, beam combiners, and frequency combs made from photonic integrated circuits—could cut the size, weight, and power of space optical payloads by an order of magnitude, but no qualification standard exists for the chips themselves. This paper collects the scattered ESA and NASA test documents, plus industry methods, into a single nineteen-step flow and then reorganizes that flow into a reusable seven-phase qualification template (PIC-SQT) with explicit test procedures and mission-class tailoring. The template's load-bearing claim is that passive cores made of silica, silicon nitride, or laser-written glass are essentially radiation-immune, so they need only one confirmation radiation test, while the full TID/DDD/SEE matrix is reserved for active III-V and germanium-on-silicon components. If this holds, a CubeSat demonstrator and an HWO-class flagship can run the same structural flow, differing only in sample size, margins, and documentation depth.

What carries the argument

The central object is the seven-phase space-qualification template (PIC-SQT), which reorganizes a 19-step master qualification flow into Phase 0 (classification and requirements) through Phase 6 (flight demonstration and heritage). Its engine is the passive/active split: the Phase-0 declaration that passive cores are radiation-tolerant by construction redirects scarce radiation-test beam time and packaging effort toward active devices. The template works by binding each phase to TRL gates, governing ESA/NASA standards, exit data products, and two bounding mission-class profiles—the LEO Class D smallsat demonstrator and the HWO-class Class A L2 flagship—so one structure spans both.

What would settle it

Run the Phase-4 radiation campaign that the template would skip on a passive AWG or beam combiner made by a process not yet covered—say LPCVD Si3N4 or ALD alumina—at HWO-equivalent levels (50-100 krad TID plus 1e11 p/cm2 protons) and detect an insertion-loss change above 0.5 dB or a channel shift above the spec's 50 pm; that measurement would break the single-confirmation rule for that platform.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that the scattered ESA (ECSS-Q-ST) and NASA (GSFC-STD-7000B GEVS, EEE-INST-002) qualification documents can be reorganized into one reusable seven-phase template (PIC-SQT) with explicit TRL gates, test procedures, and mission-class tailoring. The template's central move is a Phase-0 classification of every device as passive or active: passive silica, Si3N4, and ultrafast-laser-written glass cores are treated as radiation-tolerant by construction and need only a single confirmation radiation test, while active III-V and germanium-on-silicon components carry the full TID/DDD/SEE matrix. The paper also documents four decades of optical-fibre flight herita

Load-bearing premise

The template's central simplification assumes that passive silica, silicon nitride, and laser-written glass photonic cores are radiation-immune across all fabrication processes, so a single confirmation test suffices; that premise rests on only two open-literature campaigns and has not been shown for UV platforms or for every foundry process.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A project could run a single confirmation radiation test on passive silica/Si3N4/ULI chips and reserve the full TID/proton/heavy-ion matrix for active III-V and Ge-on-Si components.
  • The same seven-phase template can serve both a LEO CubeSat demonstrator (COTS-with-uprating, acceptance-level tests) and an HWO-class flagship (full Class A screening, 2000-hour life test, LET-80 SEL immunity), differing in sample sizes, margins, and documentation rather than test list.
  • Adopting the template as an ESA PIC annex to ECSS-Q-ST-60C plus ESCC Generic/Detail specifications, or a NASA addendum to NASA-STD-8739.11/EEE-INST-002, would give programmes an objective TRL-gated path to the TRL-6 flight gate.
  • Closing the five gating gaps—hermetic UV-PIC packaging, RHA data for ALD alumina/AlF3/AlN-on-sapphire, cryogenic qualification, space-qualified hybrid III-V integration, and space-grade PDKs—is what currently blocks visible/NIR PICs at TRL 6 and UV PICs at TRL 3-4.
  • Photonic wire bonds and two-photon-polymerized structures fit the template as a new material class (passive-but-organic) requiring polymer-specific outgassing, radiation-loss, and degree-of-cure controls rather than a new qualification flow.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the passive-core premise holds, the cost of qualifying an astrophotonic PIC collapses roughly to the cost of qualifying its active companion dies and its packaging—so the economics of flying PICs on smallsats improve faster than the TRL ladder alone suggests.
  • The template's tailoring logic implies a testable prediction: an AWG or beam combiner that passes the single confirmation radiation test on one foundry process batch should not be assumed immune across another foundry's process; the evidence base in Table 5 is too thin for that generalization, and a per-process confirmation test is the conservative reading.
  • A natural next step would be to run the Phase-4 confirmation test on the UV platforms (ALD alumina, AlF3, AlN-on-sapphire) where radiation data are still 'not yet reported'; a positive result would extend the single-test shortcut into the HWO UV channel.
  • Combined-environment ageing (UV + vacuum + radiation) of fibre-attach adhesives and polymer photonic wire bonds is a likely failure mode hidden by the single-stress tests—a proponent could integrate the paper's proposed live optical read-out into a single multi-stress chamber campaign.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a consolidation of NASA and ESA qualification standards into a seven-phase space-qualification template (PIC-SQT) for astrophotonic photonic integrated circuits. It contains a 19-step master qualification table, a tailoring matrix for LEO smallsat and HWO-class L2 missions, a TRL-versus-test-coverage roadmap, a survey of PIC material platforms, a radiation-effects summary, practitioner notes on radiation testing, and a compilation of optical-fibre flight heritage. The central practical claim is that passive astrophotonic cores (silica-on-silicon, Si3N4, ULI glass) are radiation-tolerant by construction and therefore require only a single confirmation radiation test, while the full TID/DDD/SEE matrix is reserved for active III–V and Ge-on-Si devices. The template is presented as directly adoptable by ESA and NASA programmes.

Significance. If the central claim could be supported, the paper would be a useful reference: it brings scattered standards into one place, provides a concrete TRL-gated flow, identifies test-method gaps (e.g., in-situ optical read-out during radiation, cryogenic operation, atomic-oxygen effects, photonic wire bonds), and documents four decades of optical-fibre heritage. These are genuine strengths. However, the paper's most actionable simplification — that passive cores need only a single confirmation radiation test — rests on a thin and partly mis-assigned evidence base, and the paper itself records that several passive UV platforms have no radiation data. The qualification template is a re-organisation of existing standards rather than a new test method, so its value depends on the accuracy of the radiation-tolerance classification and on the numerical tailoring values. Those load-bearing elements need strengthening before the template can be endorsed.

major comments (4)
  1. [§7.5, Table 5; §7.3.4; §11.4] The passive/active split that drives the template's main simplification is not supported by Table 5 as presented. Table 5 assigns 'tolerant to ≥1 Mrad' to silica-on-silicon PLC and 'negligible to LEO fluences' to Si3N4, citing Yin et al. (2021) in both rows. But §7.3.4 describes Yin et al. as a study of passive silicon photonic devices, not doped-silica PLCs or LPCVD Si3N4. A silicon-photonics result does not automatically transfer to different core/cladding compositions and deposition processes, where radiation-induced attenuation and index shifts can differ. The single-confirmation recommendation for all passive cores is therefore not yet justified.
  2. [§7.5, Table 5 vs. §7.6, §8.1, Table 9 Phase 0] There is an internal inconsistency between the Phase 0 classification and the paper's own gap analysis. Table 5 marks ALD alumina, AlF3 and AlN-on-sapphire as 'Not yet reported' in space-qualification literature, and §7.6 identifies UV-platform RHA as a gating gap. Yet §8.1 states that passive SiO2/Si3N4/ULI PIC waveguides are 'essentially immune,' and Phase 0 of the PIC-SQT classifies all devices as passive or active, with passive devices receiving only a single confirmation radiation test. As written, this would place unverified UV platforms under the single-test regime. The template needs an explicit platform-specific qualification rule that distinguishes 'radiation-tolerant with direct evidence' from 'no radiation data yet.'
  3. [§4, tailoring matrix rows 13–14] The numerical mission-environment values in the tailoring matrix are load-bearing because they set the test levels and radiation design margins, but they are presented without derivation or citation. For example, the LEO TID values '3–5 krad(Si) for 1 yr, 10–15 krad(Si) for 3 yr at 500 km' and the L2 proton fluence '∼5×10^10 p/cm2 for 10 yr' are given as concrete figures, yet the paper only notes in §3 that values are 'typical figures.' Since these numbers directly determine RDM-based test levels in rows 13–14, they should be traceable to a stated orbital model, shielding assumption, and reference mission specification, or explicitly labelled as illustrative.
  4. [§11.4 and §12] The paper claims the template can be 'adopted directly' by ESA and NASA programmes, but no worked example or end-to-end validation is provided. The two anchor campaigns (Piacentini et al. 2021, Mao et al. 2024) are described as worked examples, yet neither is actually run through the seven phases of Table 9 with the resulting test list, cost, or pass/fail outcomes. Without such a demonstration, the claim that the template is immediately usable as a complete qualification flow is stronger than the evidence in the paper supports. A single worked example, even retrospective, would materially strengthen the central claim.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table 9, Phase 6] Phase 6 lists 'steps 20–22' as activities, but the master qualification table in §3 contains only 19 steps. The numbering should be reconciled or replaced with explicit activity names.
  2. [§8.1, sub-test 1A] The text says 'JPL: 75 MeV·cm2/mg; ESA / ECSS: 60 MeV·cm2/mg' as maximum LETs. Earlier, §4 row 15 says 'LET threshold ≥37 MeV·cm2/mg for SEL-immune classification.' The relationship between these thresholds should be clarified to avoid confusion for practitioners.
  3. [§11.5, final paragraph] The sentence ending 'standards.1' appears to contain a stray reference marker [1]. Please check the citation placement.
  4. [§5.1, Coverage matrix] The row 'Cryogenic cycling (80 K)' uses a symbol '⊚' that is not defined in the coding legend (only '•', '◦', and '–' are defined). Please add the symbol to the legend.
  5. [§7.6, Figure 4] Figure 4 is described as an integrated maturity landscape, but the caption does not explain what the axes, colours, or marker shapes represent. A complete legend is needed for the figure to be interpretable.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the PIC-SQT template is a compilation and tailoring of externally cited standards, and its central passive/active radiation split rests on external literature rather than on author-derived fits or definitions.

full rationale

This is a review and qualification-framework paper with no fitted parameters, no quantitative derivation, and no prediction in the statistical sense. The central output, the seven-phase PIC-SQT template, is explicitly presented as a re-organization of existing ESA/NASA/industry standards (ECSS, GEVS, EEE-INST-002, MIL-STD-883, Telcordia GR-468) into a consolidated flow. The load-bearing simplification, that passive silica/Si3N4/ULI cores need only a single confirmation radiation test because they are 'radiation-tolerant by construction,' is not a definitional tautology: it is an empirical claim supported by external open-literature campaigns (Piacentini et al. 2021; Yin et al. 2021; Mao et al. 2024), not by the authors' own results. Even where Table 5 broadens Yin et al.'s silicon-photonics findings to silica-on-silicon and Si3N4, that is a citation-scope/support concern, not circularity: the argument still depends on external evidence rather than on the paper's own definitions or fitted inputs. The paper's heavy self-citations (PAWS, POCO, silica AWGs, DBC chips) are used as platform-maturity and instrument-demonstration references, but they do not carry the radiation-tolerance premise or the template's validity; the template would stand or fall on the cited external standards and radiation data regardless of the AIP results. No self-citation chain forces the conclusion, no uniqueness theorem from prior author work is invoked, and no known result is renamed as a derivation. Therefore the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The template is a re-organization of externally cited standards, so the ledger's free-parameter content is limited to hand-set reference values in the tailoring matrix (TID, proton fluence, stability requirements) that set test levels without derivation. The load-bearing premises are domain assumptions: agency permission to tailor flows, transferability of telecom/MIL reliability data to space, radiation tolerance of passive cores 'by construction' (which the paper's own Table 5 shows is unreported for the UV platforms), and the fibre-heritage analogue. No invented physical entities are introduced; PIC-SQT is a process framework, not an entity.

free parameters (3)
  • LEO reference TID (tailoring matrix) = 3-5 krad(Si)/yr (1 yr); 10-15 krad(Si)/yr (3 yr); test to 30 krad(Si) with RDM=2
    Asserted in §4 row 13 without SPENVIS/OMERE computation or citation; sets the LEO test level in the tailoring matrix.
  • L2 reference TID and proton fluence (tailoring matrix) = 2-5 krad(Si)/yr TID; 5e10 p/cm2 over 10 yr; test to 50-100 krad(Si)
    Asserted in §4 rows 13-14 for the HWO profile; no environment-model run or source is given, only a deferral to a project Radiation Environment Specification.
  • HWO phase-stability requirements = 10^-10 raw contrast; sub-mK temperature; sub-pm phase stability
    Drivers for the flagship tailoring (cryogenic cycling, TVAC depth) but asserted without citing an HWO requirements document; only a NASA program page is referenced.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption ECSS-Q-ST-60C Rev.4 and NASA EEE-INST-002 / NASA-STD-8739.11 explicitly permit tailoring of EEE/optoelectronic qualification flows for novel devices.
    Invoked in §2 and §11.1 as the legal basis for the entire template; if agencies did not accept tailored flows, the PIC-SQT would have no standing. The paper cites the standards but does not reproduce the tailoring clauses.
  • domain assumption Passive silica, Si3N4 and ULI platforms are essentially radiation-tolerant at LEO/GEO doses; 'passive astrophotonic cores are radiation-tolerant by construction'.
    §7.5 Table 5 and §11.4. The template's Phase 0 passive/active split and the single-confirmation radiation test for passive cores rest on this. Evidence base is two cited campaigns (Piacentini 2021, Mao 2024) plus Yin 2021, with Table 5 attributing silica PLC and Si3N4 tolerance to a paper whose stated scope is silicon photonic passive devices.
  • domain assumption Telcordia GR-468/GR-1221 telecom reliability data and MIL-STD test methods transfer to the space PIC context with added environment-specific overlays.
    The 19-step table uses telecom/MIL methods as the base and adds space-specific radiation/vacuum tests. Transferability of 2000 h HTOL or 500-cycle thermal data to a 5-10 year L2 mission is assumed with Arrhenius extrapolation, not demonstrated.
  • domain assumption Four decades of optical-fibre flight heritage is a valid qualification analogue for the PIC-to-instrument interface.
    §9 presents fibre heritage as the reference set for PIC packaging and harness design. The analogy from discrete fibres to integrated chips is asserted rather than argued, and fibre heritage does not by itself qualify chip-level packaging.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Qualification pathways for Photonic Integrated Circuits in Astrophotonic Space Missions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VZNMWJ4H

@misc{pith2026260800834,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Qualification pathways for Photonic Integrated Circuits in Astrophotonic Space Missions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VZNMWJ4H}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.00834}
}
read the original abstract

Photonic integrated circuits (PICs) promise order-of-magnitude reductions in the size, weight and power (SWaP) of optical subsystems for astronomy, planetary and Earth-observation missions, yet no PIC-specific space-qualification standard exists. This paper consolidates the principal NASA and ESA qualification documents that apply, or can be tailored, to astrophotonic PICs --- arrayed waveguide gratings, photonic lanterns, fibre Bragg gratings, and integrated beam combiners (ABCD, discrete beam combiners, nullers) for spectrographs and stellar interferometers. A master qualification table lists 19 standard test steps with applicable standards and EU/USA test facilities. Two reference mission profiles --- a LEO smallsat demonstrator and an HWO-class Lagrange-2 flagship --- yield a tailoring matrix, while a TRL-versus-test-coverage roadmap maps each activity onto the NASA/ESA readiness levels and review gates. A survey of UV/visible/near-infrared platforms relates spectral coverage, maturity and flight heritage, and a radiation-effects summary shows passive silica, Si3N4 and laser-written cores are essentially radiation-tolerant while active III--V and Ge devices carry the hardness burden. The central outcome is a seven-phase qualification template (PIC-SQT) with explicit TRL gates, exact test procedures and mission-class tailoring; we further identify qualification processes relevant to PICs that current standards do not cover, and document 40+ years of optical-fibre flight heritage.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    * spiejour references 2ex Madhav is the Head of R & D Astrophotonics(innoFSPEC), at the Leibniz Institute for Astrophysics Potsdam

    ) follow conventional first-author-year. * spiejour references 2ex Madhav is the Head of R & D Astrophotonics(innoFSPEC), at the Leibniz Institute for Astrophysics Potsdam. His group develops photonic technologies for astronomical instrumentation, including integrated spectrographs, OH-suppression filters, photonic lanterns, beam combiners, and frequency ...

    work page 2009

  2. [2]

    2023 Astrophotonics Roadmap: pathways to realizing multi-functional integrated astrophotonic instruments

    N. Jovanovic, P. Gatkine, N. Anugu, et al. , ``2023 astrophotonics roadmap: pathways to realizing multi-functional integrated astrophotonic instruments,'' J. Phys. Photonics 5 , 042501 (2023). arXiv:2311.00615; NASA NTRS 20230015917

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    Terrasanta et al

    G. Terrasanta et al. , ``Photonic integrated circuits for optical satellite links: a review of the technology status and space effects,'' Int. J. Satell. Commun. Networking 43 (3) (2025)

    work page 2025

  4. [4]

    Bland-Hawthorn and P

    J. Bland-Hawthorn and P. Kern, ``Astrophotonics: a new era for astronomical instruments,'' Opt. Express 17 , 1880 (2009)

    work page 2009

  5. [5]

    Arrayed Waveguide Grating Spectrometers for Astronomical Applications: New Results

    P. Gatkine, S. Veilleux, Y. Hu, et al. , ``Arrayed waveguide grating spectrometers for astronomical applications: new results,'' Opt. Express 25 , 17918 (2017). arXiv:1707.03445

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  6. [6]

    Efficient ultra-broadband low-resolution astrophotonic spectrographs

    P. Gatkine, S. Veilleux, Y. Hu, et al. , ``Efficient ultra-broadband low-resolution astrophotonic spectrographs,'' Opt. Express 32 , 17689 (2024). arXiv:2404.02376; cited as ``Gatkine et al.\ 2022'' in earlier drafts

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    S. G. Leon-Saval, A. Argyros, and J. Bland-Hawthorn, ``Photonic lanterns: a study of light propagation in multimode to single-mode converters,'' Opt. Express 18 , 8430 (2010)

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    B. R. M. Norris, N. Cvetojevic, T. Lagadec, et al. , ``First on-sky demonstration of an integrated-photonic nulling interferometer: the glint instrument,'' Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 491 , 4180 (2020)

    work page 2020

Show all 78 references
  1. [9]

    Martinod et al

    M.-A. Martinod et al. , ``Scalable photonic-based nulling interferometry with the dispersed multi-baseline glint instrument,'' Nat. Commun. 12 , 2465 (2021)

    2021

  2. [10]

    Madhav, A

    K. Madhav, A. G\"unther, E. Hernandez, et al. , ``Paws and poco: Nir astrophotonic instruments for astronomy,'' Astron. Nachr. 345 , e20230089 (2024)

    2024

  3. [11]

    M. M. Roth, K. Madhav, A. Stoll, et al. , ``Astrophotonics: photonic integrated circuits for astronomical instrumentation,'' in Proc. SPIE , 12188 (2023). arXiv:2302.06393

    2023 arXiv

  4. [12]

    NASA , ``Habitable worlds observatory mission concept.'' https://science.nasa.gov/astrophysics/programs/habitable-worlds-observatory/

  5. [13]

    Biswas, M

    A. Biswas, M. W. Wright, et al. , ``Deep space optical communications technology demonstration,'' in Proc. SPIE , 12877 , 1287706 (2024)

    2024

  6. [14]

    NASA , ``Deep space optical communications (dsoc).'' https://www.nasa.gov/mission/deep-space-optical-communications-dsoc/

  7. [15]

    C. M. Schieler, K. M. Riesing, B. C. Bilyeu, et al. , ``On-orbit demonstration of 200 gbps laser-communication downlink from the tbird cubesat,'' in Proc. SPIE Free-Space Laser Comm. XXXV , (2023). NASA NTRS 20230000434

    2023

  8. [16]

    Martin, D

    A. Martin, D. Dodane, L. Leviandier, et al. , ``Photonic-integrated-circuit-based fmcw coherent lidar,'' J. Lightwave Technol. 36 , 4640 (2018)

    2018

  9. [17]

    Lihachev et al

    G. Lihachev et al. , ``Photonic-electronic integrated circuit-based coherent lidar engine,'' Nat. Commun. 15 , 3134 (2024). arXiv:2306.07990

    2024 arXiv

  10. [18]

    D. J. Blumenthal, R. Heideman, D. Geuzebroek, et al. , ``Photonic integration for uv to ir applications,'' APL Photonics 5 , 020903 (2020)

    2020

  11. [19]

    Pilvi et al

    T. Pilvi et al. , ``Ultraviolet optical properties of aluminium fluoride thin films deposited by atomic layer deposition,'' J. Vac. Sci. Tech. A 34 , 01A120 (2016)

    2016

  12. [20]

    G. N. West, W. Loh, D. Kharas, et al. , ``Low-loss integrated photonics for the blue and ultraviolet regime,'' APL Photonics 4 , 026101 (2019)

    2019

  13. [21]

    J. D. B. Bradley and M. Pollnau, ``Rare-earth ion doped Al _2 O _3 for active integrated photonics,'' Adv. Phys. X 5 , 1833753 (2020)

    2020

  14. [22]

    Soltani et al

    M. Soltani et al. , ``Aluminum nitride integrated photonics platform for the ultraviolet to visible spectrum,'' Opt. Express 26 , 11147 (2018)

    2018

  15. [23]

    Liu et al

    J. Liu et al. , ``Low-loss aluminum nitride waveguide fabrication: propagation-loss reduction through ald and rta,'' arXiv preprint (2025). arXiv:2508.20245

    2025 arXiv

  16. [24]

    He et al

    J. He et al. , ``3d heterogeneous integration of silicon nitride and aluminium nitride on sapphire toward ultra-wideband photonic integrated circuits,'' arXiv preprint (2025). arXiv:2503.22544

    2025 arXiv

  17. [25]

    K. A. Buzaverov et al. , ``Silicon nitride integrated photonics from visible to mid-infrared spectra,'' Laser & Photon. Rev. 18 , 2400508 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Z. Ye, H. Jia, Z. Huang, et al. , ``Foundry manufacturing of tight-confinement, dispersion-engineered, ultralow-loss silicon nitride photonic integrated circuits,'' Photonics Res. 11 , 558 (2023)

    2023

  19. [27]

    Stoll, K

    A. Stoll, K. Madhav, and M. M. Roth, ``Design, simulation and characterization of integrated photonic spectrographs for astronomy i: Generation-i awg devices based on canonical layouts,'' Opt. Express 29 , 24947 (2021). arXiv:2107.06342

    2021 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Piacentini, T

    S. Piacentini, T. Vogl, G. Corrielli, et al. , ``Space qualification of ultrafast laser-written integrated waveguide optics,'' Laser & Photon. Rev. 15 , 2000167 (2021). arXiv:2004.09427 (2020)

    2021 arXiv

  21. [29]

    A. S. Nayak, L. Labadie, T. Sharma, et al. , ``First stellar photons for an integrated-optics discrete beam combiner at the william herschel telescope,'' Appl. Opt. 60 , D52 (2021)

    2021

  22. [30]

    D. Mao, L. Chang, H. Lee, et al. , ``Space-qualifying silicon photonic modulators and circuits,'' Sci. Adv. 10 , eadi9171 (2024)

    2024

  23. [31]

    Yin et al

    S. Yin et al. , ``High-energy irradiation effects on silicon photonic passive devices,'' arXiv preprint (2021). arXiv:2112.14459

    2021 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Zhao et al

    H. Zhao et al. , ``Indium phosphide photonic integrated circuits for free-space optical links,'' IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 24 (6), 6101806 (2018)

    2018

  25. [33]

    Zhao et al

    H. Zhao et al. , ``High-power indium phosphide photonic integrated circuits,'' IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 25 (6), 1--10 (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    Estrada-Bayona et al

    N. Estrada-Bayona et al. , ``Uv photonic integrated circuits for far-field structured-illumination autofluorescence microscopy,'' Nat. Commun. 13 , 4179 (2022)

    2022

  27. [35]

    Gardes, A

    F. Gardes, A. Shooa, et al. , ``A review of capabilities and scope for hybrid integration offered by silicon-nitride-based photonic integrated circuits,'' Sensors 22 , 4227 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    Stoll, K

    A. Stoll, K. Madhav, and M. M. Roth, ``Performance limits of astronomical arrayed waveguide gratings on a silica platform,'' Opt. Express 28 , 39354 (2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    Stoll, K

    A. Stoll, K. Madhav, and M. M. Roth, ``Design, simulation and characterization of integrated photonic spectrographs for astronomy ii: Generation-ii awg devices with three stigmatic points,'' Opt. Express 29 , 36226 (2021). arXiv:2110.04856

    2021 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Hernandez, A

    E. Hernandez, A. G\"unther, S. Vje s nica, et al. , ``Preliminary results of the potsdam arrayed waveguide spectrograph (paws),'' in Proc. SPIE , 13096 , 130960L (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    H. N. J. Fernando, A. Stoll, R. Eisermann, et al. , ``Planar integrated photonics spectrograph on silicon-nitride-on-insulator,'' in Proc. SPIE , 8450 , 845046 (2012)

    2012

  32. [40]

    Pedretti, S

    E. Pedretti, S. Piacentini, G. Corrielli, et al. , ``A six-aperture discrete beam combiner for j-band interferometry,'' arXiv preprint (2018). arXiv:1809.01260

    2018 arXiv

  33. [41]

    A. N. Dinkelaker, S. Smarzyk, A. S. Nayak, et al. , ``Six-telescope integrated optics beam combiner fabricated using ultrafast laser inscription for j- and h-band astronomy,'' arXiv preprint (2023). arXiv:2306.10575

    2023

  34. [42]

    A. N. Dinkelaker, ``Astrophotonic technologies,'' arXiv preprint (2024). arXiv:2407.03981. Review article

    2024 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Ludwig, F

    M. Ludwig, F. Ayhan, T. M. Schmidt, et al. , ``Ultraviolet astronomical spectrograph calibration with laser frequency combs from nanophotonic lithium niobate waveguides,'' Nat. Commun. 15 , 7146 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    u ller, Generation and stabilization of frequency combs in nonlinear microring resonators: Fundamentals and applications to astronomy . PhD thesis, Universit \

    D. Bodenm \"u ller, Generation and stabilization of frequency combs in nonlinear microring resonators: Fundamentals and applications to astronomy . PhD thesis, Universit \"a t Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany (2025)

    2025

  37. [45]

    Bodenm \"u ller, J

    D. Bodenm \"u ller, J. Chavez Boggio, and M. M. Roth, ``Optical frequency comb generated in micro-ring resonators by modulated pump-light,'' in Proc. SPIE , 11203 , 112031H (2020)

    2020

  38. [46]

    Bodenm \"u ller, K

    D. Bodenm \"u ller, K. Madhav, and M. Roth, ``The potsdam astrocomb (poco) part i: Mode crossing effect in feedback resonators,'' arXiv preprint (2023). arXiv:2311.13505 [physics.optics]

    2023 arXiv

  39. [47]

    J. J. Davenport, M. Diab, K. Madhav, et al. , ``Optimal smf packing in photonic lanterns: comparing theoretical topology to practical packing arrangements,'' J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 38 , A7 (2021). arXiv:2104.09354

    2021 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Hernandez, M

    E. Hernandez, M. M. Roth, K. Petermann, et al. , ``Mode-expansion theory and application in step-index multimode fibers for astronomical spectroscopy,'' J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 38 , A36 (2021). arXiv:2105.00945

    2021 arXiv

  41. [49]

    K. P. Arnold, H. M. Dattilo, S. M. Weiss, et al. , ``Displacement damage and ionization effects on waveguide-integrated germanium-silicon p-i-n photodiodes,'' IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 72 (4) (2025). cited as ``Arnold et al.\ 2022'' in earlier drafts

    2025

  42. [50]

    Lindenmann, G

    N. Lindenmann, G. Balthasar, D. Hillerkuss, et al. , ``Photonic wire bonding: a novel concept for chip-scale interconnects,'' Opt. Express 20 , 17667 (2012)

    2012

  43. [51]

    Blaicher, M

    M. Blaicher, M. R. Billah, J. N. Kemal, et al. , ``Hybrid multi-chip assembly of optical communication engines by in situ 3d nano-lithography,'' Light Sci. Appl. 9 , 71 (2020)

    2020

  44. [52]

    B. Lin, D. Witt, J. F. Young, et al. , ``Cryogenic optical packaging using photonic wire bonds,'' APL Photonics 8 , 126109 (2023)

    2023

  45. [53]

    Includes ECSS-Q-ST-60C Rev.4 (2025), ECSS-Q-ST-60-15C Rev.1 (Mar 2025), ECSS-Q-ST-70-02C, -70-04C, -70-06C, ECSS-Q-ST-60-13C Rev.2

    ECSS Secretariat , ``European cooperation for space standardization (ecss) standards portal.'' https://ecss.nl. Includes ECSS-Q-ST-60C Rev.4 (2025), ECSS-Q-ST-60-15C Rev.1 (Mar 2025), ECSS-Q-ST-70-02C, -70-04C, -70-06C, ECSS-Q-ST-60-13C Rev.2

    2025

  46. [54]

    ESA/SCC Generic and Detail Specifications, Qualified Parts List, evaluation reports

    European Space Agency , ``European space components information exchange system (escies) portal.'' https://escies.org. ESA/SCC Generic and Detail Specifications, Qualified Parts List, evaluation reports

  47. [55]

    EEE-INST-002 with Addendum 1; transition to NASA-STD-8739.11

    NASA , ``Nasa electronic parts and packaging (nepp) program.'' https://nepp.nasa.gov. EEE-INST-002 with Addendum 1; transition to NASA-STD-8739.11

  48. [56]

    GSFC-STD-7000B GEVS (April 2021); NASA-STD-8719.14C; NASA-STD-6016

    NASA Technical Standards Office , ``Nasa technical standards.'' https://standards.nasa.gov. GSFC-STD-7000B GEVS (April 2021); NASA-STD-8719.14C; NASA-STD-6016

    2021

  49. [57]

    NPR 7123.1; ISO 16290 / ECSS-E-AS-11C TRL definitions

    NASA , ``Technology readiness assessment best practices guide,'' (2020). NPR 7123.1; ISO 16290 / ECSS-E-AS-11C TRL definitions

    2020

  50. [58]

    Telcordia , `` GR-468-CORE : Generic reliability assurance requirements for optoelectronic devices used in telecommunications equipment.''

  51. [59]

    Telcordia , `` GR-1221-CORE : Generic reliability assurance requirements for passive optical components.''

  52. [60]

    US Department of Defense , ``Mil-std-883l test methods for microcircuits; mil-std-750e test methods for semiconductor devices; mil-std-461g emc.''

  53. [61]

    Jakeman and M

    J. Jakeman and M. Flores, ``Photonics for space flight,'' in NASA NEPP Electronics Technology Workshop (ETW) , (2021)

    2021

  54. [62]

    Sanny et al

    A. Sanny et al. , ``Towards space-qualification of astrophotonic devices in the optical/ir,'' in Proc. SPIE , 13623 (2025)

    2025

  55. [63]

    IDTechEx , ``Silicon photonics and photonic integrated circuits 2025--2035: technologies, markets, forecasts.'' Industry report (2025)

    2025

  56. [64]

    Acerbi et al

    F. Acerbi et al. , ``Radiation damage on silicon photomultipliers from ionizing and non-ionizing radiation of low-earth-orbit operations,'' Sensors 24 (2024). PMC11314964

    2024

  57. [65]

    T. A. Birks, I. Gris-S\'anchez, S. Yerolatsitis, et al. , ``The photonic lantern,'' Adv. Opt. Photonics 7 , 107 (2015)

    2015

  58. [66]

    A. N. Dinkelaker and A. e. Rahman, ``Astrophotonics: introduction to the feature issue.'' JOSA B / Applied Optics feature issue (2021)

    2021

  59. [67]

    M. N. Ott, ``Space flight applications of optical fiber: 30 years of space flight success,'' in IEEE Avionics, Fiber-Optics and Photonics Technology Conference (AVFOP) , (2010). NASA GSFC Photonics Group

    2010

  60. [68]

    Girard et al

    S. Girard et al. , ``Recent advances in radiation-hardened fiber-based technologies for space applications,'' J. Opt. (IOP) 20 , 093001 (2018)

    2018

  61. [69]

    Ferraro et al

    M. Ferraro et al. , ``Fiber-optic sensors for harsh and high-radiation environments in aerospace applications,'' Sensors 23 (2023)

    2023

  62. [70]

    Taugwalder, ``Escc standards, evaluation and qualification of optical fiber connectors for space application,'' in Proc

    F. Taugwalder, ``Escc standards, evaluation and qualification of optical fiber connectors for space application,'' in Proc. SPIE , 10564 (2017). ICSO 2012

    2017

  63. [71]

    NASA , ``Workmanship standard for fiber-optic terminations, cable assemblies and installation.'' NASA-STD-8739.5 Rev. A

  64. [72]

    NASA , ``Implementation requirements for nasa workmanship standards.'' NASA-STD-8739.6

  65. [73]

    D (2024)

    US Department of Defense , ``Performance specification: fiber, optical (metric).'' MIL-PRF-49291 Rev. D (2024). With slash sheets MIL-PRF-49291/1B, /6, /7, /12 for radiation-resistant fibres

    2024

  66. [74]

    US Department of Defense / SAE , ``Fiber-optic mechanization of a digital time-division command/response multiplex data bus.'' MIL-STD-1773 / SAE AS1773

  67. [75]

    ASTM , ``Standard test method for total mass loss and collected volatile condensable materials from outgassing in a vacuum environment.'' ASTM E595

  68. [76]

    US Department of Defense , ``Environmental engineering considerations and laboratory tests.'' MIL-STD-810

  69. [77]

    Telecommunications Industry Association , ``Fiber-optic test procedures.'' TIA/EIA-455 (FOTP) series

  70. [78]

    International Electrotechnical Commission , ``Optical fibres and optical fibre cables.'' IEC 60793 / IEC 60794 series

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.