Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

DoWhy-GCM: An extension of DoWhy for causal inference in graphical causal models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.06821 v2 pith:W2J4XOLV submitted 2022-06-14 stat.ME cs.AIstat.ML

classification stat.MEcs.AIstat.ML
keywords causaldowhydowhy-gcmcodeextensiongraphicalhttpsmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present DoWhy-GCM, an extension of the DoWhy Python library, which leverages graphical causal models. Unlike existing causality libraries, which mainly focus on effect estimation, DoWhy-GCM addresses diverse causal queries, such as identifying the root causes of outliers and distributional changes, attributing causal influences to the data generating process of each node, or diagnosis of causal structures. With DoWhy-GCM, users typically specify cause-effect relations via a causal graph, fit causal mechanisms, and pose causal queries -- all with just a few lines of code. The general documentation is available at https://www.pywhy.org/dowhy and the DoWhy-GCM specific code at https://github.com/py-why/dowhy/tree/main/dowhy/gcm.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Amortized Inference of Causal Models via Conditional Fixed-Point Iterations

    cs.LG 2024-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Amortized transformer model with conditional fixed-point iterations learns SCM causal mechanisms from data and graphs, matching per-dataset baselines and outperforming in low-data regimes.

Pith tools