Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

The little coadd that could: Estimating shear from coadded images

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.01771 v1 pith:W2RMDYGE submitted 2024-07-01 astro-ph.CO

The little coadd that could: Estimating shear from coadded images

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords shearcoaddepochsimageslensingcoaddedcoaddsfitting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Upcoming wide field surveys will have many overlapping epochs of the same region of sky. The conventional wisdom is that in order to reduce the errors sufficiently for systematics-limited measurements, like weak lensing, we must do simultaneous fitting of all the epochs. Using current algorithms this will require a significant amount of computing time and effort. In this paper, we revisit the potential of using coadds for shear measurements. We show on a set of image simulations that the multiplicative shear bias can be constrained below the 0.1% level on coadds, which is sufficient for future lensing surveys. We see no significant differences between simultaneous fitting and coadded approaches for two independent shear codes: Metacalibration and BFD. One caveat of our approach is the assumption of a principled coadd, i.e. the PSF is mathematically well-defined for all the input images. This requires us to reject CCD images that do not fully cover the coadd region. We estimate that the number of epochs that must be rejected for a survey like LSST is on the order of 20%, resulting in a small loss in depth of less than 0.1 magnitudes. We also put forward a cell-based coaddition scheme that meets the above requirements for unbiased weak lensing shear estimation in the context of LSST.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Neural Posterior Estimation for Inferring Weak Lensing Shear

    astro-ph.IM 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Neural posterior estimation recovers accurate, well-calibrated constant-shear posteriors from simulated multiband images that include blending, variable PSFs, stars, and detector artifacts.

  2. Edges In Coadded Images

    astro-ph.CO 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Edge discontinuities in coadds cause significant shear biases only in extreme cases such as two-input-image stacks or 25% PSF size jumps, and these cases can be flagged and removed with a simple PSF variation statistic.

  3. Edges In Coadded Images

    astro-ph.CO 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Edge discontinuities in coadded images cause no significant shear bias for typical galaxy populations and coadd conditions, but can exceed requirements in extremes like two-input coadds or 25% PSF variation.