Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Why Do Self-Supervised Models Transfer? Investigating the Impact of Invariance on Downstream Tasks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2111.11398 v2 pith:W2ZPPEWW submitted 2021-11-22 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords differentdownstreamtasksaugmentationinvarianceinvarianceslearningconfirm
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Self-supervised learning is a powerful paradigm for representation learning on unlabelled images. A wealth of effective new methods based on instance matching rely on data-augmentation to drive learning, and these have reached a rough agreement on an augmentation scheme that optimises popular recognition benchmarks. However, there is strong reason to suspect that different tasks in computer vision require features to encode different (in)variances, and therefore likely require different augmentation strategies. In this paper, we measure the invariances learned by contrastive methods and confirm that they do learn invariance to the augmentations used and further show that this invariance largely transfers to related real-world changes in pose and lighting. We show that learned invariances strongly affect downstream task performance and confirm that different downstream tasks benefit from polar opposite (in)variances, leading to performance loss when the standard augmentation strategy is used. Finally, we demonstrate that a simple fusion of representations with complementary invariances ensures wide transferability to all the diverse downstream tasks considered.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools