Comparison of Various Methods for the Calculation of the Distance Potential Field
pith:W42TKUBW Add to your LaTeX paper
What is a Pith Number?\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{W42TKUBW}
Prints a linked pith:W42TKUBW badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more
read the original abstract
The distance from a given position toward one or more destinations, exits, and way points is a more or less important input variable in most models of pedestrian dynamics. Except for the special case when there are no obstacles in a concave scenario -- i.e. each position is visible from any other -- the calculation of these distances is a non-trivial task. This isn't that big a problem, as long as the model only demands the distances to be stored in a Static Floor Field also called Potential Field, which never changes throughout the whole simulation. In this case a pre-calculation once before the simulation starts is sufficient. But if one wants to allow changes of the geometry during a simulation run -- imagine doors or the blocking of a corridor due to some hazard -- in the Distance Potential Field, calculation time matters strongly. This contribution gives an overview over existing and new exact and approximate methods to calculate a potential field, analytical investigations for their exactness, and tests of their computation speed. The advantages and drawbacks of the methods are discussed.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.