pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.11946 · v1 · pith:W44MBE6Vnew · submitted 2019-06-20 · 💻 cs.CR

LApps: Technological, Legal and Market Potentials of Blockchain Lightning Network Applications

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 19:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CR
keywords Lightning NetworkBlockchain scalabilityColoured coinsLAppsMicro-paymentsSecurities settlementLegal challengesCryptocurrency applications
0
0 comments X

The pith

Lightning Network removes blockchain transaction delays to enable fast non-monetary uses such as securities settlement and micro-payment business models.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates how Lightning Network technology supports instantaneous cryptocurrency transfers that overcome the latency built into blockchain systems. It examines the resulting possibilities for settling coloured coins including securities and for building new applications and payment models based on microchannels. The analysis also addresses legal obstacles that could slow adoption. A reader would care because the work maps a path from slow blockchain transactions to broader practical uses beyond simple currency movement.

Core claim

Lightning Network eliminates blockchain's transaction latency impediment by facilitating instantaneous transfers of cryptos, enabling non-monetary usage in settlement of coloured coins such as securities as well as creation of new business models based on LApps and microchannel payments and micro-trades, while legal challenges may act as impediments to adoption.

What carries the argument

Lightning Network (LN), a layer that routes instantaneous off-chain transfers to bypass blockchain latency limits.

If this is right

  • Coloured coins such as securities can be settled through LN channels without blockchain delays.
  • New LApps can be built around microchannel payments and micro-trades.
  • Legal and regulatory issues around LN use must be resolved for adoption to proceed.
  • Interoperability and scalability problems inherited from blockchain are addressed at the transfer layer.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Existing payment rails in traditional finance might face competition from LN-based micro-trade systems if legal barriers are cleared.
  • Developers could test LN channel capacity limits by attempting small-scale securities settlement pilots.
  • Market adoption rates of LN for non-currency uses would indicate whether the technical fix translates into actual business models.

Load-bearing premise

Technical ability to make fast transfers will produce workable non-monetary applications and business models without major practical or adoption barriers.

What would settle it

Widespread deployment of LN channels for settling securities trades or clear absence of any such channels after several years of LN availability.

read the original abstract

Following in the footsteps of pioneer Bitcoin, many altcoins as well as coloured coins have been being developed and merchandised adopting blockchain as the core enabling technology. However, since interoperability and scalability, due to high and capped (in particular cases) transaction latency are deep-rooted in the architecture of blockchain technology, they are by default inherited in any blockchain based applications. Lightning Network (LN) is one of the supporting technologies developed to eliminate this impediment of blockchain technology by facilitating instantaneous transfers of cryptos. Since the potentials of LN is still relatively unknown, this paper investigates the current states of development along with possible non-monetary usage of LN, especially in settlement coloured coins such as securities, as well as creation of new business models based on Lightning Applications (LApps) and microchannel payments as well as micro-trades. The legal challenges that may act as impediment to the adoption of LN is also discussed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates the technological capabilities of the Lightning Network (LN) to overcome blockchain transaction latency, surveys its current development state, explores possible non-monetary applications (particularly settlement of coloured coins such as securities), discusses creation of new business models via Lightning Applications (LApps) and microchannel payments/micro-trades, and addresses legal challenges that may impede adoption.

Significance. As an exploratory discussion paper rather than an empirical or formal study, the manuscript's value lies in mapping potential extensions of LN beyond monetary transfers and flagging legal considerations. No machine-checked proofs, reproducible code, or falsifiable predictions are offered, but the framing as an investigation of 'possible' usages avoids overclaiming translation from technical capability to viable applications.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'investigates the current states of development' is not matched by any explicit methodology, data sources, or selection criteria in the provided text; adding a brief methods paragraph would clarify scope.
  2. The manuscript would benefit from explicit citations to specific LN implementation reports or legal analyses when listing challenges, to allow readers to trace claims.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our exploratory discussion paper and the recommendation of minor revision. The report provides a clear summary of the manuscript's scope but lists no specific major comments requiring response.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The manuscript is an exploratory survey paper discussing technological, legal, and market potentials of Lightning Network applications. It contains no equations, fitted parameters, derivations, or predictions that could reduce to inputs by construction. Claims are framed as investigations of 'possible' usages rather than asserted derivations. No self-citations function as load-bearing premises for any central result. The paper is self-contained as a high-level discussion without circular structure.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a survey and discussion paper on LN potentials with no technical derivations, data fitting, or new postulates; therefore no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are present in the provided abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5686 in / 1057 out tokens · 30873 ms · 2026-05-25T19:53:04.687559+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    unconfirmed

    INTRODUCTION Despite several successful new and experimental applications of blockchain [1] technology, including the conceiving Bitcoin, there are few inbred limitations that caveat the outright utilisation of the technology. Lack of interoperability amongst various chains and restrained scalability by high transact ion latency due to decentralised conse...

  2. [2]

    funding transaction

    FUNDAMENTALS OF LIGHTNING NETWORK 2.1 Preamble A Lightning Network is a second layer Hashed Timelock Contract (HTLC) based smart contract enabling bi -directional payment channels built on top of a base layer of blockchain such as Bitcoin. LN effectuates secure routing of payments or transactions of coloured coins across multiple peer -to-peer (P2P) payme...

  3. [3]

    Alice generates a new Bob’s transaction B2 allocating 8 BTC to Alice and 12 BTC to Bob

  4. [4]

    Alice then signs B2 with her private key and transmit it to Bob

  5. [5]

    Once received, Bob signs B2 and temporarily keeps it

  6. [6]

    Bob generates a new Alice’s transaction A2 allocating 8 BTC to Alice and 12 BTC to Bob

  7. [7]

    Bob then signs A2 with his private key and transmit it to Alice

  8. [8]

    Once received, Alice signs A2 and temporarily keeps it

  9. [9]

    Alice shares RA1 invalidating A1; A1 can now be deleted

  10. [10]

    unconfirmed

    Bob shares RB1 invalidating B1; B1 can now be deleted Algorithm 1: Basic LN Algorithm, developed based on the original LN proposal by Poon and Dryja [4]. 2.3 Major Advantages Although the primary intension of developing LN was to facilitate instantaneous payments over Bitcoin networks, it brings many other advantages such as: • Since LN is the enabler of ...

  11. [11]

    interfacing

    APPLICATIONS OF LIGHTING NETWORK IN NON-MONETARY TRANSACTIONS AND FUTURE ADOPTION TRENDS Lightning network technology is still a new concept - provisionally developed and implemented with limited scope. The number and capacity of lightning transactions taking place at this moment is still very small. However, introduction of LN is gaining popularity as it...

  12. [12]

    DRIVERS OF FUTURE BUSINESS MODELS Among all the benefits of LN as described in section 2.2, following two are currently the enablers of new business models and innovation:

  13. [13]

    Lightning Applications (Lapps) and

  14. [14]

    turing-complete

    Micropayment Channel 4.1 Lightning Applications (LApps) One of the major drawbacks of Bitcoin, compared to other Blockchain 2.0 implementation such as Ethereum, is not being “turing-complete” and thus having “no” support for smart contracts. However, implementation of off -chain scaling via LN Bitcoin blockchain can now support lightning a pplications (LA...

  15. [15]

    The paper then discusses prospective usage of lighting networ ks in the clearing and settlement of coloured coins and securities

    CONCLUDING REMARKS By raising the limitations inherent in the two major failures of any blockchain-based financial application , interoperability and scalability, this paper argues that a second layer solution such as lightning network, powered by HTLC and smart contract, has potential for addressing these limitations. The paper then discusses prospective...

  16. [16]

    Blockchain Enabled Enhanced IoT Ecosystem Security

    Mahdi H. Miraz and Maaruf Ali, "Blockchain Enabled Enhanced IoT Ecosystem Security", in proceedings of the International Conference on Emerging Technologies in Computing 2018 (iCETiC '18), Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering (LNICST), vol. 200, London, UK, 2018, pp. 38-46....

  17. [17]

    Atomic Cross-chain Swaps: Development, Trajectory and Potential of Non- monetary Digital Token Swap Facilities

    Mahdi H. Miraz and David C. Donald, "Atomic Cross-chain Swaps: Development, Trajectory and Potential of Non- monetary Digital Token Swap Facilities", Annals of Emerging Technologies in Computing (AETiC), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 42-50, DOI: 10.33166/AETiC.2019.01.005, January

  18. [18]

    Available: http://aetic.theiaer.org/archive/v3/v3n1/p5.html

  19. [19]

    Blockchain speeds & the scalability debate

    Richard MacManus, "Blockchain speeds & the scalability debate", Blocksplain, February 2018. Available: https://blocksplain.com/2018/02/28/transaction-speeds/

  20. [20]

    The Bitcoin Lightning Network: Scalable Off-Chain Instant Payments

    Joseph Poon and Thaddeus Dryja, "The Bitcoin Lightning Network: Scalable Off-Chain Instant Payments", Lightning 6 https://dev.lightning.community/lapps/ Network, White Paper DRAFT Version 0.5.9.2, January 14, 14 January 2016. Available: https://lightning.network/lightning-network-paper.pdf

  21. [21]

    The CLoTH Simulator for HTLC Payment Networks with Introductory Lightning Network Performance Results

    Marco Conoscenti, Antonio Vetrò, Juan Carlos De Martin, and Federico Spini, "The CLoTH Simulator for HTLC Payment Networks with Introductory Lightning Network Performance Results", Information, vol. 9, no. 9, September 2018, 223. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2078- 2489/9/9/223

  22. [22]

    Flare: An Approach to Routing in Lightning Network

    Pavel Prihodko, Slava Zhigulin, Mykola Sahno, Aleksei Ostrovskiy, and Osuntokun Olaoluwa, "Flare: An Approach to Routing in Lightning Network", Bitfury White Paper, pp. 1-40, July 2016. Available: https://bitfury.com/content/downloads/whitepaper_flare_an_ approach_to_routing_in_lightning_network_7_7_2016.pdf

  23. [23]

    A Fast and Scalable Payment Network with Bitcoin Duplex Micropayment Channels

    Christian Decker and Roger Wattenhofer, "A Fast and Scalable Payment Network with Bitcoin Duplex Micropayment Channels", in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Stabilization, Safety, and Security of Distributed Systems (SSS 2015), Part of Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), vol. 9212, Cham, Switzerland, 2015, pp. 3-18. Available: https://l...

  24. [24]

    Sprites and State Channels: Payment Networks that Go Faster than Lightning

    Andrew Miller, Iddo Bentov, Ranjit Kumaresan, Christopher Cordi, and Patrick McCorry, "Sprites and State Channels: Payment Networks that Go Faster than Lightning", arXiv, November 2017. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1702.05812

  25. [25]

    Raiden Network

    The Raiden Network. Raiden Network. Available: https://raiden.network

  26. [26]

    Scalable Funding of Bitcoin Micropayment Channel Networks

    Conrad Burchert, Christian Decker, and Roger Wattenhofer, "Scalable Funding of Bitcoin Micropayment Channel Networks", in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Stabilization, Safety, and Security of Distributed Systems (SSS 2017), Part of Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), vol. 10616, Cham, Switzerland, 2017, pp. 361-377. Available: https:/...

  27. [27]

    Revive: Rebalancing Off- Blockchain Payment Networks

    Rami Khalil and Arthur Gervais, "Revive: Rebalancing Off- Blockchain Payment Networks", in Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS '17), Dallas, Texas, USA, 2017, pp. 439-453. Available: https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3134033

  28. [28]

    Sensor Networks Attacks Classifications and Mitigation

    Ahmed S. Abu Daia, Rabie A. Ramadan, and Magda B. Fayek, "Sensor Networks Attacks Classifications and Mitigation", Annals of Emerging Technologies in Computing (AETiC), vol. 2, no. 4, DOI: 10.33166/AETiC.2018.04.003, pp. 28-43, October 2018. Available: http://aetic.theiaer.org/archive/v2/v2n4/p3.html

  29. [29]

    A Survey of Distributed Certificate Authorities in MANETs

    Junaid Chaudhry, Kashif Saleem, Paul Haskell-Dowland, and Mahdi H. Miraz, "A Survey of Distributed Certificate Authorities in MANETs", Annals of Emerging Technologies in Computing (AETiC), vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 11-18, July 2018, DOI: 10.33166/AETiC.2018.03.002. Available: http://aetic.theiaer.org/archive/v2/v2n3/p2.html

  30. [30]

    Distributed Ledger Technology Systems: A Conceptual Framework

    Michel Rauchs et al., "Distributed Ledger Technology Systems: A Conceptual Framework", The Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance (CCAF), Judge Business School, Cambridge, UK, August 2018. Available: https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/faculty- research/centres/alternative-finance/publications/distributed- ledger-technology-systems/#.W4YWH-gzZhE

  31. [31]

    Applications of Blockchain Technology beyond Cryptocurrency

    Mahdi H. Miraz and Maaruf Ali, "Applications of Blockchain Technology beyond Cryptocurrency", Annals of Emerging Technologies in Computing (AETiC), vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1-6, DOI: 10.33166/AETiC.2018.01.001, January

  32. [32]

    Available: http://aetic.theiaer.org/archive/v2/v2n1/p1.pdf

  33. [33]

    A Recruitment and Human Resource Management Technique Using Blockchain Technology for Industry 4.0

    Md Mehedi Hassan Onik, Mahdi H. Miraz, and Chul-Soo Kim, "A Recruitment and Human Resource Management Technique Using Blockchain Technology for Industry 4.0", in Proceeding of Smart Cities Symposium (SCS-2018), Manama, Bahrain, pp. 11-16, DOI: 10.1049/cp.2018.1371, 22-23 April 2018. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8643177

  34. [34]

    Application of Blockchain in Booking and Registration Systems of Securities Exchanges

    Mahdi H. Miraz and David C. Donald, "Application of Blockchain in Booking and Registration Systems of Securities Exchanges", in proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computing, Electronics & Communications Engineering 2018 (IEEE iCCECE '18), Southend, United Kingdom, 16-17 August 2018

  35. [35]

    Restoring Direct Holdings and Unified Pricing to Securities Markets with Distributed Ledger Technology

    David C. Donald and Mahdi H. Miraz, "Restoring Direct Holdings and Unified Pricing to Securities Markets with Distributed Ledger Technology", Manuscript on file with authors

  36. [36]

    Networked Securities Markets: From Cross-Listing to Direct Connection

    David C. Donald, "Networked Securities Markets: From Cross-Listing to Direct Connection", in The Research Handbook on Asian Financial Law, Doug Arner et al., Eds.: Edward Elgar, 2019

  37. [37]

    Bitcoin: Developer Explains Why a Multi- Asset Lightning Network Might Not Work

    Paul H. Madore, "Bitcoin: Developer Explains Why a Multi- Asset Lightning Network Might Not Work", CNN, December 2018. Available: https://www.ccn.com/bitcoin- dev-explains-why-a-multi-asset-lightning-network-might- not-work/