"Hot" electrons in metallic nanostructures -- non-thermal carriers or heating?
read the original abstract
Understanding the interplay between illumination and the electron distribution in metallic nanostructures is a crucial step towards developing applications such as plasmonic photo-catalysis for green fuels, nano-scale photo-detection and more. Elucidating this interplay is challenging, as it requires taking into account all channels of energy flow in the electronic system. Here, we develop such a theory, which is based on a coupled Boltzmann-heat equations and requires only energy conservation and basic thermodynamics, where the electron distribution, and the electron and phonon (lattice) temperatures are determined {\em uniquely}. Applying this theory to realistic illuminated nanoparticle systems, we find that the electron and phonon temperatures are similar, thus justifying the (classical) single temperature models. We show that while the fraction of high-energy ``hot'' carriers compared to thermalized carriers grows substantially with illumination intensity, it remains extremely small (on the order of $10^{-8}$). Importantly, most of the absorbed illumination power goes into heating rather than generating hot carriers, thus rendering plasmonic hot carrier generation extremely inefficient. Our formulation allows for the first time a unique quantitative comparison of theory and measurements of steady-state electron distributions in metallic nanostructures.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Eppur si riscalda -- and yet, it (just) heats up: Further Comments on "Quantifying hot carrier and thermal contributions in plasmonic photocatalysis"
The authors identify flaws in temperature measurement and data analysis in Zhou et al. that invalidate claims of non-thermal contributions, showing the results are consistent with conventional thermal theory.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.