pith. sign in

arxiv: 1705.04140 · v1 · pith:W4SUR2ZMnew · submitted 2017-05-11 · 🪐 quant-ph

Comment on "Cosmic Bell Test: Measurement Settings from Milky Way Stars"

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords assumptionsbasicbellcommentfollowslettmeasurementmodel
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

This Comment argues that two assumptions, which are presented as basic assumptions of Bell's theorem in [J. Handsteiner et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 060401 (2017)] and elsewhere, in fact follow from more basic premises. Measurement independence follows from (i) the use of free variables and (ii) the causal arrow of time. Determinism follows from (i) local causality and (ii) perfect correlations (predicted by quantum mechanics). In particular, it is pointed out that the measurement-independence violating toy model of [M.J.W. Hall, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 250404 (2010)], is based on a retro-causal model. While this may be controversial, it should be possible to achieve concensus on the much simpler matter of what the basic assumptions of Bell's theorem are.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.