REVIEW 2 cited by
Long-length Legal Document Classification
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
One of the principal tasks of machine learning with major applications is text classification. This paper focuses on the legal domain and, in particular, on the classification of lengthy legal documents. The main challenge that this study addresses is the limitation that current models impose on the length of the input text. In addition, the present paper shows that dividing the text into segments and later combining the resulting embeddings with a BiLSTM architecture to form a single document embedding can improve results. These advancements are achieved by utilising a simpler structure, rather than an increasingly complex one, which is often the case in NLP research. The dataset used in this paper is obtained from an online public database containing lengthy legal documents with highly domain-specific vocabulary and thus, the comparison of our results to the ones produced by models implemented on the commonly used datasets would be unjustified. This work provides the foundation for future work in document classification in the legal field.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
CHANCERY: Evaluating Corporate Governance Reasoning Capabilities in Language Models
A 502-question benchmark for corporate governance reasoning shows current language models reach at most 78.1 percent accuracy.
-
SLM-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Small Language Models on Environmental Impacts--Extended Version
A new benchmark of 15 small language models across 23 datasets and 11 metrics shows clear accuracy-versus-energy trade-offs, with no single model dominating.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.