pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.24063 · v2 · pith:W5JNDLF3new · submitted 2025-10-28 · ⚛️ physics.chem-ph

Benchmarking foundation potentials against quantum chemistry methods for predicting molecular redox potentials

classification ⚛️ physics.chem-ph
keywords potentialschemistryapproachcalculationscomputationalefficientelectronfoundation
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Computational high-throughput virtual screening is essential for identifying redox-active molecules for sustainable applications such as electrochemical carbon capture. A primary challenge in this approach is the high computational cost associated with accurate quantum chemistry calculations. Machine learning foundation potentials (FPs) trained on extensive density functional theory (DFT) calculations offer a computationally efficient alternative. Here, we benchmark the MACE-OMol-0 and UMA FPs against a hierarchy of DFT functionals for predicting experimental molecular redox potentials for both electron transfer (ET) and proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) reactions. We find that these FPs achieve exceptional accuracy for PCET processes, rivaling their target DFT method. However, the performance is diminished for ET reactions, particularly for multi-electron transfers involving reactive ions that are underrepresented in the OMol25 training data, revealing a key out-of-distribution limitation. To overcome this, we propose an optimal hybrid workflow that uses the FPs for efficient geometry optimization and thermochemical analysis, followed by a crucial single-point DFT energy refinement and an implicit solvation correction. This pragmatic approach provides a robust and scalable strategy for accelerating high-throughput virtual screening in sustainable chemistry.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Accuracy and Efficiency Benchmarks of Pretrained Machine Learning Potentials for Molecular Simulations

    physics.chem-ph 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Benchmarks of 15 MLIPs show parameter count and training set size correlate with accuracy, architecture drives speed and memory, and explicit Coulomb terms provide no benefit.