Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 1 cited by

The spectrum of defect ABJM theory

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read All quantum fluctuations around the ABJM 1/2-BPS domain wall are diagonalized, yielding a supersymmetric spectrum.

desk verdict A serious, technically strong diagonalization of the ABJM domain-wall spectrum whose two central algebraic identities are asserted rather than proven; worth a referee, with requests for proofs. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.17479 v2 pith:W65E7ELG submitted 2024-12-23 hep-th

Charlotte Kristjansen , Xin Qian , Chenliang Su This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords ABJMtheorydefectCFT1/2-BPSdomainwallfuzzysphericalharmonicsquantumfluctuationspectrumChern-Simonsconformaldimension
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

ABJM theory with a 1/2-BPS domain wall has a vacuum in which two scalar vevs grow like 1/√z, breaking the gauge group and half the supersymmetry. This paper expands the action around that background and fully diagonalizes the quadratic fluctuation action, determining the masses of every bosonic and fermionic mode, including the gauge fields that mix through Chern–Simons kinetic terms. The result is a spectrum that assembles into supermultiplets: bosonic and fermionic conformal dimensions pair up with differences of ±1/2, as expected for a 1/2-BPS defect. With the spectrum in hand, the propagators of all modes can be written down from a single AdS propagator formula, opening the way to perturbative loop computations of one-point functions, correlation functions, and Wilson loops in the defect CFT.

What carries the argument

The central objects are the modified fuzzy spherical harmonics $T^{m+1/2}_{\ell+1/2}$, a basis for the rectangular $(q-1)\times q$ matrices that carry the $\pi_{q-1}\otimes\pi_q$ representation of $\mathrm{su}(2)$, built from the classical fields $y_1,y_2$ and standard fuzzy spherical harmonics; and the fermionic mixing operator $\hat{F}\varphi := i y_1 \varphi^{\dagger *} y_2 - i y_2 \varphi^{\dagger *} y_1$, whose conjectured eigenvalues $(-1)^{j-n}(j+1)$ on those harmonics are verified numerically. These objects diagonalize the easy and complicated mass matrices, reducing the mixing problem to $\mathrm{su}(2)$ representation theory. For the complicated bosons, the machinery also includes the massive Chern–Simons equation-of-motion solutions of Appendix B, expressed in modified Bessel functions, from which the scaling parameter $\nu$ (and hence the conformal dimension) is read off from the Bessel index.

What would settle it

Compute $\hat{F}$ on the modified fuzzy spherical harmonic $R^{n+1/2}_{j+1/2}$ for a small case such as $q=3$ or $q=4$ with exact algebra (or high-precision numerics) and check whether $\hat{F}R^{n+1/2}_{j+1/2}=(-1)^{j-n}(j+1)R^{n+1/2}_{j+1/2}$ holds for every mode; any single counterexample would falsify the complicated-fermion mass formula in Table 4.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the quadratic part of the quantum action has been diagonalized, determining the spectrum of the quantum fields (Section 5). The spectrum, summarized in Tables 8 and 9, shows the characteristic supersymmetric pattern: fields combine into multiplets with conformal dimensions differing by ±1/2. The diagonalization uses $\mathrm{su}(2)$ representation theory through modified fuzzy spherical harmonics for rectangular matrices, and an operator $\hat{F}$ whose eigenvalue formula (4.6) is verified numerically. As a consequence, the propagators of all fluctuation modes can be constructed from a general AdS propagator expression together with the Bessel-function solutions of Appendix B, making perturbative loop computations in the defect CFT possible.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the numerically verified conjecture (4.6) for the eigenvalues of the fermionic mixing operator $\hat{F}$: it is not proven analytically, and the masses of the complicated fermions listed in Table 4 depend on it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • All propagating modes around the ABJM domain wall now have known masses and multiplicities, so the quadratic action is fully diagonal and the propagator of every mode can be written down from eq. (2.29) with the Appendix B solutions.
  • The spectrum organizes into supermultiplets with conformal dimension differences of ±1/2, confirming that the 1/2-BPS nature of the defect is reflected in the quantum fluctuation spectrum.
  • Perturbative computation of one-point functions at higher loop orders becomes feasible, potentially feeding into an asymptotic all-loop integrability formula for one-point functions.
  • Lower-point correlation functions and Wilson loop expectation values in the defect CFT can now be computed perturbatively, providing input for the boundary conformal bootstrap program.
  • The counting of degrees of freedom is checked: the total multiplicities in each block match the number of independent real field components.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The analytically unproven eigenvalue conjecture (4.6) could be tested in isolation; a proof would remove the only numerically supported step in the fermion diagonalization.
  • Because the same classical matrices $y_1,y_2$ appear in mass-deformed ABJM theory, the modified fuzzy spherical harmonics and the diagonalization technique should transfer directly to that theory, as the paper hints in its conclusion.
  • The rectangular-matrix fuzzy harmonics introduced here may find use in other defect or impurity problems where background vevs are rectangular, beyond the specific ABJM domain wall.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper aims to determine the spectrum of quadratic fluctuations around the 1/2-BPS domain wall in ABJM theory. The authors expand the action around the classical Basu–Harvey solution, classify the fields as easy/complicated and into color blocks, and diagonalize the quadratic action using su(2) representation theory and modified fuzzy spherical harmonics. For the easy fields and the complicated fermions the mass matrices are diagonalized directly; for the complicated bosons the coupled Chern–Simons/scalar equations of motion are solved and the mass parameter is read off from the index of the Bessel functions. The final spectrum is summarized in Tables 8 and 9 and exhibits boson and fermion conformal dimensions differing by 1/2, which the authors interpret as the expected supersymmetric multiplet structure.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, this is an important technical step: it provides the quadratic fluctuation spectrum around the 1/2-BPS ABJM domain wall, from which propagators can be constructed via eq. (2.29) and Appendix B, thereby enabling perturbative computations of local and non-local observables in this defect CFT. The paper contains genuine technical advances: the construction of modified fuzzy spherical harmonics for the π_{q−1}⊗π_q and π_2⊗π_{q−1}⊗π_q representations (Appendix A), the explicit Bessel-function solutions for the massive Chern–Simons equations of motion (Appendix B), and careful multiplicity counts that in Tables 5–7 exactly match the number of independent real field components. The supersymmetric multiplet structure is an output of the computation, not an input, and no free parameters or fits to target data are used. The main weaknesses are two unproved algebraic identities on which the diagonal-block spectrum rests; these are explicitly flagged by the authors and are discussed below.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.1, Eq. (4.6)] The eigenvalue conjecture (4.6) for the fermionic mixing operator F-hat is the sole input that produces the (տ)-block complicated-fermion masses in Table 4 (masses ±(ℓ−1/2) with multiplicity 4ℓ) and, through Table 9, the claimed supersymmetric multiplet structure. The paper states that "A numerical investigation is compatible with the following result" and later notes that an analytical derivation of (4.6) would be interesting. This is load-bearing: a wrong eigenvalue in a single irrep would change the spectrum while preserving the total multiplicity count, so the matching multiplicities are not a substitute for a proof. I request either an analytical derivation of (4.6) or, failing that, a detailed description of the numerical investigation—including the range of q values, the number and nature of the modes checked, the precision, and ideally a reproducibility statement—so that the conjecture can be independently verified.
  2. [§4.2.3, Eq. (4.60)] The identity (4.60) for the action of L^β_γ on the composite combinations y_α W†_β y_γ − y_γ W†_β y_α is asserted without derivation or numerical check. This identity is precisely what reduces the diagonal-block scalar equation of motion to eq. (4.61), which then yields Table 7 and the corresponding rows of Table 9. Because the central claim that the quadratic action has been diagonalized depends on this reduction, the identity is load-bearing. The authors should provide a proof of (4.60) or an independent verification (for example, a direct check in the orthonormal basis of Appendix A.3). Without this, the diagonal-block bosonic spectrum remains conditional.
  3. [Appendix B, Eq. (B.8)] The second independent set of K-solutions (B.7) is discarded by imposing the gauge condition ∂_a A^a = 0. As written, it is not clear that this condition is a complete gauge fixing in the presence of the defect and that the discarded solutions are pure gauge rather than physical modes. Since Tables 5–7 are based on using only one set of solutions for each sector, the completeness of the spectrum depends on this step. Please justify the gauge choice and explain why it does not remove physical degrees of freedom; alternatively, show that the discarded solutions have the same index ν and therefore do not affect the read-off of the spectrum.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Table 7 caption] The caption lists "Y α(տ),Y α(տ)"; the second entry should presumably be "Y †_α(տ)".
  2. [§4.1, Eq. (4.4)] The convention ψ^{tilde α} = ε^{tilde α tilde β} ψ_{tilde β} with the stated result ψ^3 = −ψ_4, ψ^4 = ψ_3 is potentially confusing, since it appears to imply ψ^3 = −ψ_3. Please spell out the index-raising convention explicitly.
  3. [Appendix A.3] The Gram–Schmidt orthonormalization of the pairs {y_α Yhat^m_ℓ, Y^m_ℓ y_α} is asserted but not carried out. Since these states are used as a basis in eqs. (4.53)–(4.54), a brief description of the inner product and of the resulting normalized states—or an argument that the normalization drops out of the eigenvalue problem—would improve reproducibility.
  4. [§2.1, Eq. (2.14)] The notation q /BD_{q−1} for the identity matrix is unusual; please define the symbol at first use to avoid ambiguity.
  5. [§5, Eqs. (5.1)–(5.2)] The displayed equations (5.1) and (5.2) are typeset as tables but are not referred to as tables; please format or reference them consistently.
  6. [References] Reference [41] lists the title as "A massive study of m2-brane proposals"; the standard title is "A massive study of M2-brane proposals" (capitalization of M2).
  7. [§5, Tables 8–9] The footnote that multiplicities should be multiplied by two for complex fields (Y and ψ) should appear in the main text before the tables, not only in a footnote, to avoid ambiguity in the counting.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the spectrum is derived from the ABJM action by explicit diagonalization; the unproved identities (4.6) and (4.60) are load-bearing conjectures but not circular inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is the diagonalization of the quadratic fluctuation action around the 1/2-BPS Basu-Harvey domain wall. The derivation chain is: expand the ABJM action (2.15)-(2.22), (3.10), (4.1), (4.12); classify fields; decompose the color/flavour mixing using su(2) representation theory and modified fuzzy spherical harmonics; and read off masses from the index of the resulting Bessel functions. No parameter is fitted to the final spectrum, and the supersymmetric multiplet structure shown in Tables 8 and 9 is an output consistency check, not an input used to fix masses. The genuinely load-bearing items that are asserted rather than derived are eq. (4.6), the numerically verified eigenvalue conjecture for the fermionic mixing operator F-hat, and eq. (4.60), the reduction formula used for the diagonal-block scalar EOM. These are unproved lemmas on which parts of Tables 4, 7 and 9 depend; the authors themselves flag eq. (4.6) as awaiting an analytical derivation. A failure of these identities would invalidate parts of the claimed spectrum, but that is a correctness/completeness risk, not circularity: the identities are algebraic statements about the fuzzy-harmonic basis, not restatements of the target spectrum. The self-citations to refs. [18,19,31] supply the classical background, the N=4 perturbative strategy, and the integrability context; they do not by themselves assert the ABJM spectrum obtained here. Hence the derivation is self-contained in the relevant sense, with a minor caveat that two key algebraic identities remain conjectural.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The derivation rests on the standard ABJM action, the known BPS domain wall solution, su(2) representation theory, and the standard AdS/CFT dictionary; these are imported from the cited literature. There are no fitted free parameters: the integers q and N are theory parameters, and the functions f, h, g in the EOM solutions are fixed by normalization and boundary conditions. No new physical entities are postulated; the modified fuzzy spherical harmonics and the recombined fields B_mu,alpha, X^+, X^- are mathematical basis objects and field redefinitions within existing degrees of freedom. The fragile, paper-specific inputs are the numerically verified eigenvalue conjecture (4.6), the asserted formula (4.60), the solution-level gauge condition (B.8), and the sketched Gram-Schmidt orthonormalization (A.3).

assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption The ABJM action with manifest SU(4) R-symmetry as displayed in eq. (2.1), in the conventions of Bandres-Lipstein-Schwarz [40].
    The entire computation expands this action around the domain wall background; the paper imports it from refs. [39,40] without derivation.
  • domain assumption The scale-invariant 1/2-BPS domain wall solution of eqs. (2.3)-(2.5), with classical vevs y forming (q-1) x q rectangular blocks.
    From Terashima [29] and Kristjansen-Vu-Zarembo [31]; every mixing term in the quadratic action is defined relative to this background, and the block sizes determine all multiplicities in the spectrum.
  • standard math su(2) representation theory, including tensor product decompositions (eq. A.1), Casimir eigenvalues (eqs. A.2-A.4), and the standard fuzzy spherical harmonics of refs. [53,54].
    The entire diagonalization in Sections 3-4 reduces to decomposing su(2) tensor products; this is standard mathematics invoked without proof.
  • domain assumption The AdS/CFT dictionary converting mass parameters to conformal dimensions: eqs. (2.25), (2.30), (2.31), and the BF bound (2.27).
    Used to translate the computed mass spectrum into conformal dimensions of dual defect operators, citing refs. [42-45]; standard but imported rather than derived.
  • ad hoc to paper The eigenvalue conjecture (4.6) for the fermionic mixing operator F-hat, verified numerically but not proven analytically.
    Section 4.1 states 'A numerical investigation is compatible with the following result'; the diagonal block of the complicated fermion spectrum (Table 4) depends on it, and the authors explicitly call for an analytic proof.
  • ad hoc to paper Formula (4.60) for the action of L-beta-gamma on the composite field combinations in the diagonal block scalar equation of motion.
    Stated without derivation in Section 4.2.3 as 'we find a useful formula'; it is essential for reducing the scalar EOM to eq. (4.61).
  • ad hoc to paper The gauge fixing condition partial_a A^a = 0, imposed on solutions to eliminate the second independent solution set (eqs. B.7 and B.8).
    The paper deliberately avoids gauge fixing terms in the action and instead constrains the solutions; the clean read-off of the spectrum depends on this elimination being legitimate.
  • ad hoc to paper Orthonormalization of the new basis states y_alpha Yhat^m_l and Y^m_l y_alpha by Gram-Schmidt, asserted without explicit construction.
    Appendix A.3 states that orthonormalization 'should be done by the usual Gram-Schmidt process on each pair'; the normalized bases are required for the diagonalization to yield the stated multiplicities.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The spectrum of defect ABJM theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/W65E7ELG

@misc{pith2026241217479,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The spectrum of defect ABJM theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/W65E7ELG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.17479}
}
read the original abstract

We determine the spectrum of quantum fluctuations in a 1/2-BPS domain wall version of ABJM theory, thereby enabling the perturbative exploration of the corresponding defect CFT. As expected, the spectrum reflects the supersymmetry of the model.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. String theory methods for defect CFTs

    hep-th 2025-01 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A review paper that re-presents earlier results on integrable probe-brane defects and holographic defect correlators without adding a new central result.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Gaiotto and E

    D. Gaiotto and E. Witten, Supersymmetric Boundary Conditions in N=4 Super Yang-Mill s Theory, J. Statist. Phys. 135 (2009) 789 [0804.2902]

    arXiv 2009

  2. [2]

    Gaiotto and E

    D. Gaiotto and E. Witten, S-Duality of Boundary Conditions In N=4 Super Yang-Mills Theory, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 13 (2009) 721 [0807.3720]

    arXiv 2009

  3. [3]

    ’t Hooft, On the Phase Transition Towards Permanent Quark Confinement , Nucl

    G. ’t Hooft, On the Phase Transition Towards Permanent Quark Confinement , Nucl. Phys. B 138 (1978) 1

    work page 1978

  4. [4]

    Kapustin, Wilson-’t Hooft operators in four-dimensional gauge theor ies and S-duality , Phys

    A. Kapustin, Wilson-’t Hooft operators in four-dimensional gauge theor ies and S-duality , Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 025005 [hep-th/0501015]

    arXiv 2006

  5. [5]

    Gukov and E

    S. Gukov and E. Witten, Gauge Theory, Ramification, And The Geometric Langlands Program, hep-th/0612073

    arXiv

  6. [6]

    Diaconescu, D-branes, monopoles and Nahm equations , Nucl

    D.-E. Diaconescu, D-branes, monopoles and Nahm equations , Nucl. Phys. B 503 (1997) 220 [hep-th/9608163]

    arXiv 1997

  7. [7]

    Constable, R.C

    N.R. Constable, R.C. Myers and O. Tafjord, The Noncommutative bion core , Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 106009 [hep-th/9911136]

    arXiv 2000

  8. [8]

    Kristjansen, G.W

    C. Kristjansen, G.W. Semenoff and D. Young, Chiral primary one-point functions in the D3-D7 defect conformal field theory , JHEP 01 (2013) 117 [1210.7015]

    arXiv 2013

Show all 54 references
  1. [9]

    de Leeuw and A

    M. de Leeuw and A. Holguin, Integrable Conformal Defects in N=4 SYM , 2406.13741

    arXiv

  2. [10]

    Wang, Taming defects in N = 4 super-Yang-Mills , JHEP 08 (2020) 021 [2003.11016]

    Y. Wang, Taming defects in N = 4 super-Yang-Mills , JHEP 08 (2020) 021 [2003.11016]. – 31 –

    2020 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Komatsu and Y

    S. Komatsu and Y. Wang, Non-perturbative defect one-point functions in planar N = 4 super-Yang-Mills, Nucl. Phys. B 958 (2020) 115120 [2004.09514]

    2020 arXiv

  4. [12]

    de Leeuw, C

    M. de Leeuw, C. Kristjansen and K. Zarembo, One-point Functions in Defect CFT and Integrability, JHEP 08 (2015) 098 [1506.06958]

    2015 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Buhl-Mortensen, M

    I. Buhl-Mortensen, M. de Leeuw, C. Kristjansen and K. Zarem bo, One-point Functions in AdS/dCFT from Matrix Product States , JHEP 02 (2016) 052 [1512.02532]

    2016 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Buhl-Mortensen, M

    I. Buhl-Mortensen, M. de Leeuw, A.C. Ipsen, C. Kristjansen a nd M. Wilhelm, Asymptotic One-Point Functions in Gauge-String Duality with Defects , Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 261604 [1704.07386]

    2017 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Gombor and Z

    T. Gombor and Z. Bajnok, Boundary states, overlaps, nesting and bootstrapping AdS/ dCFT, JHEP 10 (2020) 123 [2004.11329]

    2020 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Kristjansen, D

    C. Kristjansen, D. M¨ uller and K. Zarembo, Integrable boundary states in D3-D5 dCFT: beyond scalars, JHEP 08 (2020) 103 [2005.01392]

    2020 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Gombor and Z

    T. Gombor and Z. Bajnok, Boundary state bootstrap and asymptotic overlaps in AdS/dC FT, JHEP 03 (2021) 222 [2006.16151]

    2021 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Buhl-Mortensen, M

    I. Buhl-Mortensen, M. de Leeuw, A.C. Ipsen, C. Kristjansen a nd M. Wilhelm, One-loop one-point functions in gauge-gravity dualities with defec ts, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 231603 [1606.01886]

    2016 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Buhl-Mortensen, M

    I. Buhl-Mortensen, M. de Leeuw, A.C. Ipsen, C. Kristjansen a nd M. Wilhelm, A Quantum Check of AdS/dCFT , JHEP 01 (2017) 098 [1611.04603]

    2017 arXiv

  12. [20]

    de Leeuw, A.C

    M. de Leeuw, A.C. Ipsen, C. Kristjansen, K.E. Vardinghus and M . Wilhelm, Two-point functions in AdS/dCFT and the boundary conformal bootstrap equations, JHEP 08 (2017) 020 [1705.03898]

    2017 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Baerman, A

    J. Baerman, A. Chalabi and C. Kristjansen, Superconformal two-point functions of the Nahm pole defect in N=4 super-Yang-Mills theory , Phys. Lett. B 853 (2024) 138642 [2401.13749]

    2024 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Okuyama and G.W

    K. Okuyama and G.W. Semenoff, Wilson loops in N=4 SYM and fermion droplets , JHEP 06 (2006) 057 [hep-th/0604209]

    2006 arXiv

  15. [23]

    C. Choi, J. Gomis and R.I. Garc ´ ıa, Surface Operators and Exact Holography , 2406.08541

    arXiv

  16. [24]

    Kristjansen and K

    C. Kristjansen and K. Zarembo, ’t Hooft loops and integrability , JHEP 08 (2023) 184 [2305.03649]

    2023 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Gombor and Z

    T. Gombor and Z. Bajnok, Dual overlaps and finite coupling ’t Hooft loops , 2408.14901

    arXiv

  18. [26]

    Kristjansen and K

    C. Kristjansen and K. Zarembo, ’t Hooft loops in N=4 super-Yang-Mills , 2412.01972

    arXiv

  19. [27]

    Aharony, O

    O. Aharony, O. Bergman, D.L. Jafferis and J. Maldacena, N=6 superconformal Chern-Simons-matter theories, M2-branes and their gravit y duals , JHEP 10 (2008) 091 [0806.1218]

    2008 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Minahan and K

    J.A. Minahan and K. Zarembo, The Bethe ansatz for superconformal Chern-Simons , JHEP 09 (2008) 040 [0806.3951]

    2008 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Terashima, On M5-branes in N=6 Membrane Action , JHEP 08 (2008) 080 [0807.0197]

    S. Terashima, On M5-branes in N=6 Membrane Action , JHEP 08 (2008) 080 [0807.0197]

    2008 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Basu and J.A

    A. Basu and J.A. Harvey, The M2-M5 brane system and a generalized Nahm’s equation , Nucl. Phys. B 713 (2005) 136 [hep-th/0412310]. – 32 –

    2005 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Kristjansen, D.-L

    C. Kristjansen, D.-L. Vu and K. Zarembo, Integrable domain walls in ABJM theory , JHEP 02 (2022) 070 [2112.10438]

    2022 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Gombor, On exact overlaps for gl(N) symmetric spin chains , Nucl

    T. Gombor, On exact overlaps for gl(N) symmetric spin chains , Nucl. Phys. B 983 (2022) 115909 [2110.07960]

    2022 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Gombor and C

    T. Gombor and C. Kristjansen, Overlaps for matrix product states of arbitrary bond dimension in ABJM theory , Phys. Lett. B 834 (2022) 137428 [2207.06866]

    2022 arXiv

  26. [34]

    P. Yang, Y. Jiang, S. Komatsu and J.-B. Wu, Three-point functions in ABJM and Bethe Ansatz, JHEP 01 (2022) 002 [2103.15840]

    2022 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Bai and M.-Z

    N. Bai and M.-Z. Shao, Integrable matrix product state of ABJM theory from project ing method, 2411.09282

    arXiv

  28. [36]

    Dekel and Y

    A. Dekel and Y. Oz, Integrability of Green-Schwarz Sigma Models with Boundari es, JHEP 08 (2011) 004 [1106.3446]

    2011 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Linardopoulos and K

    G. Linardopoulos and K. Zarembo, String integrability of defect CFT and dynamical reflection matrices, JHEP 05 (2021) 203 [2102.12381]

    2021 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Linardopoulos, String integrability of the ABJM defect , JHEP 06 (2022) 033 [2202.06824]

    G. Linardopoulos, String integrability of the ABJM defect , JHEP 06 (2022) 033 [2202.06824]

    2022 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Minahan, W

    J.A. Minahan, W. Schulgin and K. Zarembo, Two loop integrability for Chern-Simons theories with N=6 supersymmetry , JHEP 03 (2009) 057 [0901.1142]

    2009 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Bandres, A.E

    M.A. Bandres, A.E. Lipstein and J.H. Schwarz, Studies of the abjm theory in a formulation with manifest su(4) r-symmetry , Journal of High Energy Physics 2008 (2008) 027–027

    2008

  33. [41]

    Gomis, D

    J. Gomis, D. Rodr ´ ıguez-G´ omez, M.V. Raamsdonk and H. Verlinde, A massive study of m2-brane proposals, Journal of High Energy Physics 2008 (2008) 113–113

    2008

  34. [42]

    Breitenlohner and D.Z

    P. Breitenlohner and D.Z. Freedman, Stability in Gauged Extended Supergravity , Annals Phys. 144 (1982) 249

    1982

  35. [43]

    Liu and A.A

    H. Liu and A.A. Tseytlin, On four point functions in the CFT / AdS correspondence , Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 086002 [hep-th/9807097]

    1999 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography , Adv

    E. Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253 [hep-th/9802150]

    1998 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Kawano and K

    T. Kawano and K. Okuyama, Spinor exchange in AdS(d+1) , Nucl. Phys. B 565 (2000) 427 [hep-th/9905130]

    2000 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Grosse, C

    H. Grosse, C. Klimcik and P. Presnajder, Topologically nontrivial field configurations in noncommutative geometry, Commun. Math. Phys. 178 (1996) 507 [hep-th/9510083]

    1996 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Baez, A.P

    S. Baez, A.P. Balachandran, B. Ydri and S. Vaidya, Monopoles and solitons in fuzzy physics , Commun. Math. Phys. 208 (2000) 787 [hep-th/9811169]

    2000 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Dasgupta, M.M

    K. Dasgupta, M.M. Sheikh-Jabbari and M. Van Raamsdonk, Matrix perturbation theory for M theory on a PP wave , JHEP 05 (2002) 056 [hep-th/0205185]

    2002 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Nastase, C

    H. Nastase, C. Papageorgakis and S. Ramgoolam, The Fuzzy S**2 structure of M2-M5 systems in ABJM membrane theories , JHEP 05 (2009) 123 [0903.3966]

    2009 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Adachi, G

    H. Adachi, G. Ishiki, T. Matsumoto and K. Saito, Matrix regularization for Riemann surfaces with magnetic fluxes , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 106009 [2002.02993]. – 33 –

    2020 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Gimenez Grau, C

    A. Gimenez Grau, C. Kristjansen, M. Volk and M. Wilhelm, A Quantum Check of Non-Supersymmetric AdS/dCFT, JHEP 01 (2019) 007 [1810.11463]

    2019 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Gimenez-Grau, C

    A. Gimenez-Grau, C. Kristjansen, M. Volk and M. Wilhelm, A quantum framework for AdS/dCFT through fuzzy spherical harmonics on S 4, JHEP 04 (2020) 132 [1912.02468]

    2020 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Hoppe, Quantum theory of a massless relativistic surface and a two- dimensional bound state problem , Ph.D

    J. Hoppe, Quantum theory of a massless relativistic surface and a two- dimensional bound state problem , Ph.D. thesis, MIT, 1982

    1982

  46. [54]

    de Wit, J

    B. de Wit, J. Hoppe and H. Nicolai, On the quantum mechanics of supermembranes , Nuclear Physics B 305 (1988) 545 . – 34 –

    1988

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.