Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Estimating Missing Data in Temporal Data Streams Using Multi-directional Recurrent Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1711.08742 v1 pith:W6UDBOFZ submitted 2017-11-23 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords datastreamsmissingestimationmeasurementsmedicalacrossapproach
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Missing data is a ubiquitous problem. It is especially challenging in medical settings because many streams of measurements are collected at different - and often irregular - times. Accurate estimation of those missing measurements is critical for many reasons, including diagnosis, prognosis and treatment. Existing methods address this estimation problem by interpolating within data streams or imputing across data streams (both of which ignore important information) or ignoring the temporal aspect of the data and imposing strong assumptions about the nature of the data-generating process and/or the pattern of missing data (both of which are especially problematic for medical data). We propose a new approach, based on a novel deep learning architecture that we call a Multi-directional Recurrent Neural Network (M-RNN) that interpolates within data streams and imputes across data streams. We demonstrate the power of our approach by applying it to five real-world medical datasets. We show that it provides dramatically improved estimation of missing measurements in comparison to 11 state-of-the-art benchmarks (including Spline and Cubic Interpolations, MICE, MissForest, matrix completion and several RNN methods); typical improvements in Root Mean Square Error are between 35% - 50%. Additional experiments based on the same five datasets demonstrate that the improvements provided by our method are extremely robust.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MissHyper: Restoring Clinical Synchronicity in Missingness-Guided Hypergraph Forecasting

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    MissHyper restores same-timestamp clinical context before hypergraph propagation and reduces forecasting MSE and MAE on PhysioNet 2012, MIMIC-III, and MIMIC-IV relative to an unchanged hypergraph backbone.

Pith tools