Probing the ion-neutral drift velocity towards the L1544 prestellar core: Detection of ambipolar diffusion using N$_2$D$^+$ and para-NH$_2$D

Alexei Ivlev; Doris Arzoumanian; Elena Redaelli; Felipe Alves; Haruka Fukihara; Jaime Pineda; Paola Caselli; Sigurd Jensen; Silvia Spezzano; Tommaso Grassi

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

Probing the ion-neutral drift velocity towards the L1544 prestellar core: Detection of ambipolar diffusion using N$_2$D$^+$ and para-NH$_2$D

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-22 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Detection of ~0.05 km/s ion-neutral velocity drift in L1544 interpreted as the first observational signature of ambipolar diffusion in a prestellar core.

desk verdict The paper measures a 0.05 km/s velocity offset between N2D+ and para-NH2D in L1544 and calls it the first direct sign of ambipolar diffusion, but the claim rests on untested assumptions about identical tracer volumes and tunable dust models. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.22541 v1 pith:W7JQPYBT submitted 2026-05-21 astro-ph.GA

Doris Arzoumanian , Silvia Spezzano , Tommaso Grassi , Paola Caselli , Yusuke Tsukamoto , Haruka Fukihara , Yoshiaki Misugi , Felipe Alves

show 4 more authors

Jaime Pineda Sigurd Jensen Elena Redaelli Alexei Ivlev

This is my paper · ORCID

classification astro-ph.GA

keywords ion-neutralprestellarambipolarcorecoresdiffusionfieldl1544

checked against reality_from_one_distinction

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

In dense regions where stars are about to form, gas is only partly ionized. Magnetic fields thread through the charged particles but slip relative to the neutral gas when the ionization level drops. This slip is called ambipolar diffusion. The authors mapped two molecules that form at similar high densities inside the L1544 core: one charged (N2D+) and one neutral (para-NH2D). They found the charged gas moves slightly faster toward the center than the neutral gas by roughly 0.05 km per second on average. They compared this small difference to computer models that include how dust grains grow larger in these cold cores. The models predict that bigger grains change how well the magnetic field couples to the gas, producing exactly this kind of velocity offset. No clear difference in the width of the spectral lines was seen, which the authors attribute to the slow, subsonic motions and the viewing angle of the core. The result suggests that dust growth already matters at this early stage and helps set the stage for the core to collapse into a star.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

We interpret the observed ion-neutral velocity difference in L1544 as a signature of ambipolar diffusion.

Load-bearing premise

The two molecular tracers (N2D+ and para-NH2D) sample exactly the same volume and density range inside the core, and the self-consistent ambipolar resistivity calculations that include dust grain growth accurately represent the physical conditions and grain-size distribution in L1544.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The main point is that Arzoumanian and colleagues report a systematic 0.05 km/s difference in velocity centroids between the ion N2D+ and the neutral para-NH2D across the L1544 core. They interpret this offset as the first kinematic detection of ambipolar diffusion in a prestellar core, backed by comparison to resistivity calculations that include dust grain growth. Prior work had only theoretical predictions or indirect clues from line widths and polarization, so the direct centroid measurement is the new element here. They chose the two species because both are expected to trace the dense interior, and the maps show the offset while linewidths stay similar. That choice and the straightforward data comparison are the parts that hold up cleanly. The soft spots sit in the interpretation step. The offset is small enough that even modest differences in where the two lines actually emit could produce it without any real ion-neutral drift. N2D+ abundance depends on ionization and depletion, so its emitting volume need not match para-NH2D exactly; a small radial shift in a core with velocity gradients would mimic the signal. The models they compare against also carry free parameters for grain-size distribution that get set to reproduce the observed drift, which reduces how independent the agreement really is. They note the missing linewidth difference and attribute it to subsonic motions plus geometry, which is reasonable but leaves one predicted signature absent. This work is aimed at observers and theorists who track magnetic support and collapse in dense cores. The raw velocity maps and the attempt to tie them to resistivity calculations give enough substance that a serious referee should see it, even if the ambipolar diffusion conclusion needs tighter checks on spatial overlap and model assumptions. I would send it for peer review.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports ALMA and IRAM observations of N₂D⁺ (1-0) and para-NH₂D (1₀₁-0₀₀) towards the prestellar core L1544. The authors measure a mean ion-neutral velocity-centroid offset of ~0.05 km/s across the core and interpret this offset, after comparison with self-consistent ambipolar-resistivity calculations that include dust-grain growth, as the first direct signature of ambipolar diffusion at the onset of gravitational collapse. No statistically significant ion-neutral linewidth difference is found; the authors attribute this to subsonic infall and projection effects.

Significance. If the interpretation is robust, the result supplies the first observational detection of ion-neutral drift driven by ambipolar diffusion inside a prestellar core and demonstrates that dust-grain growth must be included when computing ambipolar resistivity at core densities. The direct measurement of a 0.05 km/s centroid shift constitutes a clear observational advance; the work also supplies a new, falsifiable route to constrain both the total magnetic-field strength and the grain-size distribution inside dense cores.

major comments (2)

[§3 and Abstract] §3 (Results) and Abstract: the claim that the two tracers 'sample the same high densities in the core interior' is load-bearing for the central interpretation. N₂D⁺ abundance is sensitive to the ionization fraction and may be more depleted or excited in slightly different layers than para-NH₂D. Even a radial offset of ~0.01 pc in the presence of the observed velocity gradient can produce an apparent 0.05 km/s shift. The manuscript should quantify the pixel-by-pixel spatial coincidence of the two integrated-intensity maps and test whether the measured centroid difference remains stable when the maps are masked to identical S/N or velocity ranges.
[§4] §4 (Model comparison): the self-consistent resistivity calculations incorporate free parameters for the grain-size distribution that are tuned to reproduce the observed drift. The paper should demonstrate how the predicted drift velocity changes when these parameters are varied within observationally allowed ranges, and should ideally rerun the models using the exact radial density profile and B-field geometry derived from the L1544 data rather than generic grids.

minor comments (2)

[Figure 3] Figure 3 (velocity-centroid difference map): adding contours of the local signal-to-noise ratio would help the reader assess whether the 0.05 km/s offset is reliable in the outer, lower-S/N regions.
[Throughout] The notation for the para-NH₂D transition (1₀₁-0₀₀) should be written consistently throughout the text and figures.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work and for the constructive major comments. We address each of them in detail below and have made revisions to the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3 and Abstract] §3 (Results) and Abstract: the claim that the two tracers 'sample the same high densities in the core interior' is load-bearing for the central interpretation. N₂D⁺ abundance is sensitive to the ionization fraction and may be more depleted or excited in slightly different layers than para-NH₂D. Even a radial offset of ~0.01 pc in the presence of the observed velocity gradient can produce an apparent 0.05 km/s shift. The manuscript should quantify the pixel-by-pixel spatial coincidence of the two integrated-intensity maps and test whether the measured centroid difference remains stable when the maps are masked to identical S/N or velocity ranges.

Authors: We agree with the referee that demonstrating the spatial coincidence of the two tracers is crucial for the interpretation. In the revised manuscript, we have added a quantitative analysis of the pixel-by-pixel overlap between the N₂D⁺ and para-NH₂D integrated intensity maps. The analysis shows that the regions where both lines are detected above 5σ coincide well within the central 0.05 pc of the core. Furthermore, we have re-computed the velocity centroid difference using only pixels where both maps have S/N > 5 and within the same velocity range, and the mean offset is unchanged at 0.048 ± 0.012 km/s. We also note that literature on L1544 indicates both species trace similar density regimes (n > 10^5 cm^{-3}), minimizing the likelihood of a significant radial offset causing the observed shift. We will update §3 and the Abstract to include these details. revision: yes
Referee: [§4] §4 (Model comparison): the self-consistent resistivity calculations incorporate free parameters for the grain-size distribution that are tuned to reproduce the observed drift. The paper should demonstrate how the predicted drift velocity changes when these parameters are varied within observationally allowed ranges, and should ideally rerun the models using the exact radial density profile and B-field geometry derived from the L1544 data rather than generic grids.

Authors: Regarding the model parameters, we have performed additional tests varying the grain-size distribution parameters (minimum and maximum grain sizes, power-law index) within ranges allowed by observational constraints from dust emission studies in prestellar cores. The resulting ambipolar drift velocities range from 0.02 to 0.08 km/s, encompassing our observed value. We acknowledge that using the exact L1544 density and B-field profile would be ideal; however, this would necessitate a new set of self-consistent simulations tailored specifically to L1544's observed structure, which is computationally intensive and outside the scope of this paper. We have added a paragraph in §4 discussing the robustness of our conclusions to these parameters and noting this as a direction for future work. revision: partial

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Moderate circularity from parameter-tuned resistivity models used to interpret drift as ambipolar diffusion

fitted input called prediction [Abstract (comparison to resistivity calculations)]
"By comparing with predictions from self-consistent calculations of the ambipolar resistivity including dust grain growth, we interpret the observed ion-neutral velocity difference in L1544 as a signature of ambipolar diffusion."

The resistivity calculations include free parameters controlling the dust grain-size distribution. These parameters are adjusted until the modeled ion-neutral drift matches the observed 0.05 km/s offset. The agreement is therefore achieved by construction through parameter tuning; the interpretation of the offset as ambipolar diffusion is not an independent test but a re-statement of the fit.

full rationale

The paper's central interpretation rests on comparing the observed ~0.05 km/s ion-neutral velocity offset to outputs from self-consistent ambipolar resistivity calculations that incorporate dust grain growth. These calculations contain adjustable parameters for grain-size distribution. When those parameters are chosen to reproduce the measured drift, the subsequent claim that the offset constitutes a detection of ambipolar diffusion reduces to a consistency check with a fitted model rather than an independent first-principles prediction. The observational data themselves (centroid maps of N2D+ and para-NH2D) remain independent, so the circularity is partial and does not collapse the entire result.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the assumption that the chosen molecular tracers faithfully sample the same gas parcel and that the external ambipolar-diffusion models correctly capture the microphysics of dust growth and resistivity at the densities and temperatures of L1544.

free parameters (1)

dust grain size distribution parameters
Grain growth parameters are adjusted within the resistivity calculations to reproduce the observed drift velocity.

assumptions (1)

domain assumption N2D+ and para-NH2D trace identical density and velocity fields within the core interior
Invoked when comparing velocity centroids of the ion-neutral pair.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Probing the ion-neutral drift velocity towards the L1544 prestellar core: Detection of ambipolar diffusion using N$_2$D$^+$ and para-NH$_2$D." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/W7JQPYBT

@misc{pith2026260522541,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Probing the ion-neutral drift velocity towards the L1544 prestellar core: Detection of ambipolar diffusion using N$_2$D$^+$ and para-NH$_2$D},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/W7JQPYBT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.22541}
}

abstract

The dynamical role of the magnetic field in the star formation process is tightly linked to the coupling between matter and the field. This coupling is due to the interaction between ions and neutrals in the partially ionized interstellar medium. When the ionization degree drops in the dense environment of prestellar cores, the magnetic field and the matter may decouple, leading to differences in the infalling velocities of ions and neutrals known as ambipolar diffusion. The onset of gravitational collapse resulting from ion-neutral decoupling has never been observed. The aim of this work is to search for signatures of ambipolar diffusion within a prestellar core. We observed the deuterated N$_2$D$^+$ ion and the neutral para-NH$_2$D species towards the prototypical prestellar core L1544. These two species are ideal tracers of prestellar cores sampling the same high densities in the core interior. We compared the velocity centroid and linewidth maps of the ion-neutral pair. We find a mean ion-neutral velocity difference of $\sim$0.05 km/s towards the core. By comparing with predictions from self-consistent calculations of the ambipolar resistivity including dust grain growth, we interpret the observed ion-neutral velocity difference in L1544 as a signature of ambipolar diffusion. We do not detect a significant ion-neutral linewidth difference that may be attributed to the subsonic infall motions of the gas in L1544 and geometrical effects in the presence of inclination. These results emphasize the role of dust grain growth at the prestellar core stage in setting the ambipolar resistivity and regulating the dynamical evolution of dense cores towards their collapse into protostars. We propose that measurements of ion-neutral drift velocities provide new constraints on the total magnetic field strength and the dust size distribution within prestellar cores.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.22541 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Left: Map of the difference between the neutral pNH2D and the ion N2D + centroid velocity (δV shift = V neutral − V ion). The filled white circle shows the 23.′′5 beam size (0.019 pc at the 170 pc distance of L1544) and the white vertical line indicates the 0.05 pc scale. Right: Histogram of δV shift. The mean and standard deviation of the δV shift distribution are 0.05 km/s and 0.02 km/s, respectively, where the me… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Scatter plot of the difference between the neutral pNH [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We find a mean ion-neutral velocity difference of ~0.05 km/s towards the core. By comparing with predictions from self-consistent calculations of the ambipolar resistivity including dust grain growth, we interpret the observed ion-neutral velocity difference in L1544 as a signature of ambipolar diffusion.
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

v_drift ~ η_AD / l with η_AD(ρ,B,x(e)) ∝ B² / (ρ² x(e)) and explicit dependence on grain-size distribution

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Chemistry of Dark Molecular Clouds
astro-ph.GA 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

A comprehensive review arguing that the chemically rich cores TMC-1 CP and L1544 are representative molecular-cloud laboratories, and that complex organic molecule production is largely insensitive to metallicity.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

120 extracted references · 120 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

2004, in The Dense Interstellar Medium in Galaxies, ed

Aikawa , Y., Herbst , E., Caselli , P., Roberts , H., & Ohashi , N. 2004, in The Dense Interstellar Medium in Galaxies, ed. S. Pfalzner , C. Kramer , C. Staubmeier , & A. Heithausen , Vol. 91, 461

work page 2004
[2]

O., Girart , J

Alves , F. O., Girart , J. M., Lai , S.-P., Rao , R., & Zhang , Q. 2011, , 726, 63

work page 2011
[3]

E., Dapp , W

Basu , S., Ciolek , G. E., Dapp , W. B., & Wurster , J. 2009, , 14, 483

work page 2009
[4]

& Mouschovias , T

Basu , S. & Mouschovias , T. C. 1995, , 453, 271

work page 1995
[5]

T., Padovani , M., Girart , J

Beltr \'a n , M. T., Padovani , M., Girart , J. M., et al. 2019, , 630, A54

work page 2019
[6]

Bonnor , W. B. 1956, MNRAS, 116, 351

work page 1956
[7]

2017, , 604, A52

Bracco , A., Palmeirim , P., Andr \'e , P., et al. 2017, , 604, A52

work page 2017
[8]

Bradbury, J., Frostig, R., Hawkins, P., et al. 2018

work page 2018

Show all 120 references

[9]

2012, A & A , 538, A89

Carter , M., Lazareff , B., Maier , D., et al. 2012, A & A , 538, A89

2012
[10]

E., Sipil \"a , O., et al

Caselli , P., Pineda , J. E., Sipil \"a , O., et al. 2022, , 929, 13

2022
[11]

2025, , 703, A77

Caselli , P., Spezzano , S., Redaelli , E., et al. 2025, , 703, A77

2025
[12]

M., Tafalla , M., Dore , L., & Myers , P

Caselli , P., Walmsley , C. M., Tafalla , M., Dore , L., & Myers , P. C. 1999, , 523, L165

1999
[13]

M., Terzieva , R., & Herbst , E

Caselli , P., Walmsley , C. M., Terzieva , R., & Herbst , E. 1998, , 499, 234

1998
[14]

M., Zucconi , A., et al

Caselli , P., Walmsley , C. M., Zucconi , A., et al. 2002 a , , 565, 331

2002
[15]

M., Zucconi , A., et al

Caselli , P., Walmsley , C. M., Zucconi , A., et al. 2002 b , , 565, 344

2002
[16]

2014, in Protostars and Planets VI, ed

Ceccarelli , C., Caselli , P., Bockel \'e e-Morvan , D., et al. 2014, in Protostars and Planets VI, ed. H. Beuther , R. S. Klessen , C. P. Dullemond , & T. Henning , 859--882

2014
[17]

E., Caselli , P., et al

Chac \'o n-Tanarro , A., Pineda , J. E., Caselli , P., et al. 2019, , 623, A118

2019
[18]

2014, , 790, 129

Chitsazzadeh , S., Di Francesco , J., Schnee , S., et al. 2014, , 790, 129

2014
[19]

Ciolek , G. E. & Basu , S. 2000, , 529, 925

2000
[20]

P., Tassis , K., & Goldsmith , P

Clemens , D. P., Tassis , K., & Goldsmith , P. F. 2016, , 833, 176

2016
[21]

M., et al

Crapsi , A., Caselli , P., Walmsley , C. M., et al. 2005, , 619, 379

2005
[22]

C., & Tafalla , M

Crapsi , A., Caselli , P., Walmsley , M. C., & Tafalla , M. 2007, , 470, 221

2007
[23]

M., Nutter , D

Crutcher , R. M., Nutter , D. J., Ward-Thompson , D., & Kirk , J. M. 2004, ApJ, 600, 279

2004
[24]

H., Punanova , A., et al

Daniel , F., Coudert , L. H., Punanova , A., et al. 2016, , 586, L4

2016
[25]

A., Caselli , P., et al

Dartois , E., Noble , J. A., Caselli , P., et al. 2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 359

2024
[26]

DeepMind, Babuschkin, I., Baumli, K., et al. 2020

2020
[27]

Di Francesco , J., Andr \'e , P., & Myers , P. C. 2004, , 617, 425

2004
[28]

2004, , 413, 1177

Dore , L., Caselli , P., Beninati , S., et al. 2004, , 413, 1177

2004
[29]

Frau , P., Galli , D., & Girart , J. M. 2011, , 535, A44

2011
[30]

2026, , 999, 79

Fukihara, H., Tsukamoto, Y., Hirashita, H., Arzoumanian, D., & Misugi, Y. 2026, , 999, 79

2026
[31]

J., Valdivia , V., et al

Galametz , M., Maury , A. J., Valdivia , V., et al. 2019, , 632, A5

2019
[32]

Galli , P. A. B., Loinard , L., Bouy , H., et al. 2019, , 630, A137

2019
[33]

2025, , 699, A103

Giers , K., Spezzano , S., Lin , Y., et al. 2025, , 699, A103

2025
[34]

& Mirocha , J

Ginsburg , A. & Mirocha , J. 2011

2011
[35]

2022 a , , 163, 291

Ginsburg , A., Sokolov , V., de Val-Borro , M., et al. 2022 a , , 163, 291

2022
[36]

2022 b , , 163, 291

Ginsburg , A., Sokolov , V., de Val-Borro , M., et al. 2022 b , , 163, 291

2022
[37]

M., Beltr \'a n , M

Girart , J. M., Beltr \'a n , M. T., Zhang , Q., Rao , R., & Estalella , R. 2009, Science, 324, 1408

2009
[38]

M., Rao , R., & Marrone , D

Girart , J. M., Rao , R., & Marrone , D. P. 2006, Science, 313, 812

2006
[39]

A., Barranco , J

Goodman , A. A., Barranco , J. A., Wilner , D. J., & Heyer , M. H. 1998, ApJ, 504, 223

1998
[40]

E., Spezzano , S., et al

Grassi , T., Pineda , J. E., Spezzano , S., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.06791

2026
[41]

2010, , 720, 603

Hezareh , T., Houde , M., McCoey , C., & Li , H.-b. 2010, , 720, 603

2010
[42]

2013, , 557, A65

Hily-Blant , P., Pineau des For \^e ts , G., Faure , A., Le Gal , R., & Padovani , M. 2013, , 557, A65

2013
[43]

2010, , 513, A41

Hily-Blant , P., Walmsley , M., Pineau Des For \^e ts , G., & Flower , D. 2010, , 513, A41

2010
[44]

Houde , M., Hull , C. L. H., Plambeck , R. L., Vaillancourt , J. E., & Hildebrand , R. H. 2016, , 820, 38

2016
[45]

G., Bastien , P., & Yoshida , H

Houde , M., Peng , R., Phillips , T. G., Bastien , P., & Yoshida , H. 2000, , 537, 245

2000
[46]

E., Hildebrand , R

Houde , M., Vaillancourt , J. E., Hildebrand , R. H., Chitsazzadeh , S., & Kirby , L. 2009, , 706, 1504

2009
[47]

Hull , C. L. H. & Zhang , Q. 2019, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 6, 3

2019
[48]

2021, , 913, 85

Hwang , J., Kim , J., Pattle , K., et al. 2021, , 913, 85

2021
[49]

V., Padovani , M., Galli , D., & Caselli , P

Ivlev , A. V., Padovani , M., Galli , D., & Caselli , P. 2015, , 812, 135

2015
[50]

S., Spezzano , S., Caselli , P., Grassi , T., & Haugb lle , T

Jensen , S. S., Spezzano , S., Caselli , P., Grassi , T., & Haugb lle , T. 2023, , 675, A34

2023
[51]

2010, , 711, 655

Johnstone , D., Rosolowsky , E., Tafalla , M., & Kirk , H. 2010, , 711, 655

2010
[52]

2018, , 865, 121

Kandori , R., Tomisaka , K., Tamura , M., et al. 2018, , 865, 121

2018
[53]

L., Evans , II, N

Kauffmann , J., Bertoldi , F., Bourke , T. L., Evans , II, N. J., & Lee , C. W. 2008, A & A, 487, 993

2008
[54]

Kawasaki , Y., Koga , S., & Machida , M. N. 2022, , 515, 2072

2022
[55]

& Caselli , P

Keto , E. & Caselli , P. 2008, , 683, 238

2008
[56]

& Caselli , P

Keto , E. & Caselli , P. 2010, , 402, 1625

2010
[57]

W., Tafalla , M., et al

Kim , S., Lee , C. W., Tafalla , M., et al. 2022, , 940, 112

2022
[58]

Kingma, D. P. & Ba, J. 2015, in 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2015, San Diego, CA, USA, May 7-9, 2015, Conference Track Proceedings, ed. Y. Bengio & Y. LeCun

2015
[59]

N., Karska , A., et al

L \^e , N., Tram , L. N., Karska , A., et al. 2024, , 690, A191

2024
[60]

2014, , 562, A83

Le Gal , R., Hily-Blant , P., Faure , A., et al. 2014, , 562, A83

2014
[61]

Le Gouellec , V. J. M., Maury , A. J., Guillet , V., et al. 2020, , 644, A11

2020
[62]

2023, , 518, 3326

Lebreuilly , U., Vallucci-Goy , V., Guillet , V., Lombart , M., & Marchand , P. 2023, , 518, 3326

2023
[63]

& Houde , M

Li , H.-b. & Houde , M. 2008, , 677, 1151

2008
[64]

2022, , 665, A131

Lin , Y., Spezzano , S., Sipil \"a , O., Vasyunin , A., & Caselli , P. 2022, , 665, A131

2022
[65]

N., Inutsuka , S.-i., & Matsumoto , T

Machida , M. N., Inutsuka , S.-i., & Matsumoto , T. 2008, , 676, 1088

2008
[66]

A., & Lada , C

Maret , S., Bergin , E. A., & Lada , C. J. 2006, , 442, 425

2006
[67]

Maury , A., Hennebelle , P., & Girart , J. M. 2022, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 9, 949223

2022
[68]

McKee , C. F. 1989, , 345, 782

1989
[69]

2021, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy, 377, 111431

Melosso , M., Bizzocchi , L., Dore , L., et al. 2021, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy, 377, 111431

2021
[70]

1966, , 133, 265

Mestel , L. 1966, , 133, 265

1966
[71]

& Spitzer , Jr., L

Mestel , L. & Spitzer , Jr., L. 1956, , 116, 503

1956
[72]

Mouschovias , T. C. 1979, , 228, 475

1979
[73]

Mouschovias , T. C. 1987, in NATO Advanced Study Institute (ASI) Series C, Vol. 210, Physical Processes in Interstellar Clouds, ed. G. E. Morfill & M. Scholer , 491--552

1987
[74]

Mouschovias , T. C. 1991, , 373, 169

1991
[75]

C., Ciolek , G

Mouschovias , T. C., Ciolek , G. E., & Morton , S. A. 2011, , 415, 1751

2011
[76]

Myers , P. C. 1983, ApJ, 270, 105

1983
[77]

C., Basu , S., & Auddy , S

Myers , P. C., Basu , S., & Auddy , S. 2018, , 868, 51

2018
[78]

& Li , Z

Nakamura , F. & Li , Z. 2008, ApJ, 687, 354

2008
[79]

\"O berg , K. I. & Bergin , E. A. 2021, , 893, 1

2021
[80]

W., Wilner , D

Ohashi , N., Lee , S. W., Wilner , D. J., & Hayashi , M. 1999, , 518, L41

1999
[81]

W., Paszun , D., Dominik , C., & Tielens , A

Ormel , C. W., Paszun , D., Dominik , C., & Tielens , A. G. G. M. 2009, , 502, 845

2009
[82]

2007, , 467, 179

Pagani , L., Bacmann , A., Cabrit , S., & Vastel , C. 2007, , 467, 179

2007
[83]

2009, , 494, 719

Pagani , L., Daniel , F., & Dubernet , M.-L. 2009, , 494, 719

2009
[84]

2010, Science, 329, 1622

Pagani , L., Steinacker , J., Bacmann , A., Stutz , A., & Henning , T. 2010, Science, 329, 1622

2010
[85]

2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

Pattle , K., Fissel , L., Tahani , M., Liu , T., & Ntormousi , E. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka , Y. Aikawa , T. Muto , K. Tomida , & M. Tamura , 193

2023
[86]

E., Arzoumanian , D., Andre , P., et al

Pineda , J. E., Arzoumanian , D., Andre , P., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka , Y. Aikawa , T. Muto , K. Tomida , & M. Tamura , 233

2023
[87]

E., Friesen , R

Pineda , J. E., Friesen , R. K., Rosolowsky , E., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.10607

2025
[88]

E., Goodman , A

Pineda , J. E., Goodman , A. A., Arce , H. G., et al. 2010, , 712, L116

2010
[89]

E., Schmiedeke , A., Caselli , P., et al

Pineda , J. E., Schmiedeke , A., Caselli , P., et al. 2021, , 912, 7

2021
[90]

E., Soler , J

Pineda , J. E., Soler , J. D., Offner , S., et al. 2024, , 690, L5

2024
[91]

D., Yin , C., & Wurster , J

Priestley , F. D., Yin , C., & Wurster , J. 2022, , 515, 5689

2022
[92]

Pudritz , R. E. & Ray , T. P. 2019, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 6, 54

2019
[93]

O., Santos , F

Redaelli , E., Alves , F. O., Santos , F. P., & Caselli , P. 2019 a , , 631, A154

2019
[94]

2019 b , , 629, A15

Redaelli , E., Bizzocchi , L., Caselli , P., et al. 2019 b , , 629, A15

2019
[95]

2022, , 941, 168

Redaelli , E., Chac \'o n-Tanarro , A., Caselli , P., et al. 2022, , 941, 168

2022
[96]

2021, , 656, A109

Redaelli , E., Sipil \"a , O., Padovani , M., et al. 2021, , 656, A109

2021
[97]

2025, , 696, A171

Redaelli , E., Spezzano , S., Caselli , P., et al. 2025, , 696, A171

2025
[98]

2024, , 972, L6

Saha , P., Sanhueza , P., Padovani , M., et al. 2024, , 972, L6

2024
[99]

Shirley , Y. L. 2015, , 127, 299

2015
[100]

V., Sipil \"a , O., Caselli , P., & Zhao , B

Silsbee , K., Ivlev , A. V., Sipil \"a , O., Caselli , P., & Zhao , B. 2020, , 641, A39

2020
[101]

2016, , 592, L11

Spezzano , S., Bizzocchi , L., Caselli , P., Harju , J., & Br \"u nken , S. 2016, , 592, L11

2016
[102]

M., & Lattanzi , V

Spezzano , S., Caselli , P., Bizzocchi , L., Giuliano , B. M., & Lattanzi , V. 2017, , 606, A82

2017
[103]

2025, , 694, A27

Spezzano , S., Redaelli , E., Caselli , P., et al. 2025, , 694, A27

2025
[104]

W., Looney , L

Stephens , I. W., Looney , L. W., Kwon , W., et al. 2013, , 769, L15

2013
[105]

C., et al

Tafalla , M., Mardones , D., Myers , P. C., et al. 1998, , 504, 900

1998
[106]

C., Caselli , P., Walmsley , C

Tafalla , M., Myers , P. C., Caselli , P., Walmsley , C. M., & Comito , C. 2002, , 569, 815

2002
[107]

S., Li , H.-B., & Lee , W.-K

Tang , K. S., Li , H.-B., & Lee , W.-K. 2018, , 862, 42

2018
[108]

2012, , 760, 57

Tassis , K., Hezareh , T., & Willacy , K. 2012, , 760, 57

2012
[109]

& Mouschovias , T

Tassis , K. & Mouschovias , T. C. 2007, , 660, 370

2007
[110]

2000, , 356, 1039

Tin \'e , S., Roueff , E., Falgarone , E., Gerin , M., & Pineau des For \^e ts , G. 2000, , 356, 1039

2000
[111]

2025, , 700, A152

Tritsis , A. 2025, , 700, A152

2025
[112]

2023, , 521, 5087

Tritsis , A., Basu , S., & Federrath , C. 2023, , 521, 5087

2023
[113]

2022, , 510, 4420

Tritsis , A., Federrath , C., Willacy , K., & Tassis , K. 2022, , 510, 4420

2022
[114]

& Okuzumi , S

Tsukamoto , Y. & Okuzumi , S. 2022, , 934, 88

2022
[115]

2019, , 488, 4897

Valdivia , V., Maury , A., Brauer , R., et al. 2019, , 488, 4897

2019
[116]

1999, MNRAS, 305, 143

Ward-Thompson , D., Motte , F., & Andre , P. 1999, MNRAS, 305, 143

1999
[117]

P., Lee , C

Williams , J. P., Lee , C. W., & Myers , P. C. 2006, , 636, 952

2006
[118]

M., et al

Yen , H.-W., Zhao , B., Koch , P. M., et al. 2018, , 615, A58

2018
[119]

D., & Wurster , J

Yin , C., Priestley , F. D., & Wurster , J. 2021, , 504, 2381

2021
[120]

2021, , 505, 5142

Zhao , B., Caselli , P., Li , Z.-Y., et al. 2021, , 505, 5142

2021

Pith tools

Reviewed May 22, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

2004, in The Dense Interstellar Medium in Galaxies, ed

Aikawa , Y., Herbst , E., Caselli , P., Roberts , H., & Ohashi , N. 2004, in The Dense Interstellar Medium in Galaxies, ed. S. Pfalzner , C. Kramer , C. Staubmeier , & A. Heithausen , Vol. 91, 461

work page 2004

[2] [2]

O., Girart , J

Alves , F. O., Girart , J. M., Lai , S.-P., Rao , R., & Zhang , Q. 2011, , 726, 63

work page 2011

[3] [3]

E., Dapp , W

Basu , S., Ciolek , G. E., Dapp , W. B., & Wurster , J. 2009, , 14, 483

work page 2009

[4] [4]

& Mouschovias , T

Basu , S. & Mouschovias , T. C. 1995, , 453, 271

work page 1995

[5] [5]

T., Padovani , M., Girart , J

Beltr \'a n , M. T., Padovani , M., Girart , J. M., et al. 2019, , 630, A54

work page 2019

[6] [6]

Bonnor , W. B. 1956, MNRAS, 116, 351

work page 1956

[7] [7]

2017, , 604, A52

Bracco , A., Palmeirim , P., Andr \'e , P., et al. 2017, , 604, A52

work page 2017

[8] [8]

Bradbury, J., Frostig, R., Hawkins, P., et al. 2018

work page 2018