Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Determining the core-collapse supernova explosion mechanism with current and future gravitational-wave observatories

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.18221 v2 pith:W7SO6HM5 submitted 2023-11-30 astro-ph.HE gr-qc

classification astro-ph.HEgr-qc
keywords explosionexplosionsgravitational-wavemechanismneutrino-drivencore-collapsedeterminemagneto-rotational
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Gravitational waves are emitted from deep within a core-collapse supernova, which may enable us to determine the mechanism of the explosion from a gravitational-wave detection. Previous studies suggested that it is possible to determine if the explosion mechanism is neutrino-driven or magneto-rotationally powered from the gravitational-wave signal. However, long duration magneto-rotational waveforms, that cover the full explosion phase, were not available during the time of previous studies, and explosions were just assumed to be magneto-rotationally driven if the model was rapidly rotating. Therefore, we perform an updated study using new 3D long-duration magneto-rotational core-collapse supernova waveforms that cover the full explosion phase, injected into noise for the Advanced LIGO, Einstein Telescope and NEMO gravitational-wave detectors. We also include a category for failed explosions in our signal classification results. We then determine the explosion mechanism of the signals using three different methods: Bayesian model selection, dictionary learning, and convolutional neural networks. The three different methods are able to distinguish between neutrino-driven explosions and magneto-rotational explosions, even if the neutrino-driven explosion model is rapidly rotating. However they can only distinguish between the non-exploding and neutrino-driven explosions for signals with a high signal to noise ratio.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Reconstructing Core-Collapse Supernova Gravitational-Wave Signals with Transdimensional Bayesian Inference

    astro-ph.HE 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Transdimensional Bayesian inference with tBilby reconstructs core-collapse supernova gravitational-wave signals in simulated LIGO noise with overlaps up to 85%, and captures the dominant proto-neutron-star mode even a...

  2. Toward More Realistic Machine-Learning Inference of the Dense-Matter Equation of State from Supernova Gravitational Waves

    astro-ph.HE 2026-03 conditional novelty 4.5 of 10

    Using a linear SVM, EOS classification from bounce gravitational waves remains robust to real noise, progenitor diversity, and bounce-time uncertainty in the frequency domain, but collapses in the time domain under ti...

  3. Parameter Estimation Horizon of Core-Collapse Supernovae with a Network of Gravitational-Wave Detectors

    astro-ph.HE 2026-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A CNN can recover supernova peak frequency out to about 30 kpc and rotation/amplitude out to 200-250 kpc with current networks, extending to roughly 300 kpc and 2-2.5 Mpc with third-generation detectors.

Pith tools