pith. sign in

arxiv: 1107.1229 · v1 · pith:WBFJMSH2new · submitted 2011-07-06 · 📊 stat.AP · cs.IR· physics.data-an

Characteristic Characteristics

classification 📊 stat.AP cs.IRphysics.data-an
keywords solutionmodelpersonalitysix-clusterclusteringfactorfive-factoritem
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

While five-factor models of personality are widespread, there is still not universal agreement on this as a structural framework. Part of the reason for the lingering debate is its dependence on factor analysis. In particular, derivation or refutation of the model via other statistical means is a worthwhile project. In this paper we use the methodology of spectral clustering to articulate the structure in the dataset of responses of 20,993 subjects on a 300-item item version of the IPIP NEO personality questionnaire, and we compare our results to those obtained from a factor analytic solution. We found support for five- and six-cluster solutions. The five-cluster solution was similar to a conventional five-factor solution, but the six-cluster and six-factor solutions differed significantly, and only the six-cluster solution was readily interpretable: it gave a model similar to the HEXACO model. We suggest that spectral clustering provides a robust alternative view of personality data.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.