Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 163 references

Magnetic Moir\'e Systems: a review

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This review establishes that the moiré potential—the periodic landscape formed by twisting or lattice-mismatching two-dimensional layers—is a general control mechanism for magnetism, producing new phases, excitations, and transport…

desk verdict A genuinely useful review of moiré magnetism, but the missing figure table and an unresolved tension about twisted CrI3 need fixing before it is citable. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.05620 v2 pith:WBU6KLAR submitted 2025-06-05 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Paula Mellado This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords moirésuperlatticestwo-dimensionalmagnetismtwistronicschromiumtrihalidesskyrmionsmagnonsvanderWaalsheterostructurestopological
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that the periodic potential created by superimposing two slightly twisted or lattice-mismatched two-dimensional layers—the moiré potential—is a general mechanism for controlling magnetism. It distinguishes two situations: moiré-induced magnetism, where strong correlations in moiré flat bands make non-magnetic layers (such as graphene or transition-metal dichalcogenides) order magnetically, and moiré-modulated intrinsic atomic-scale magnetism, where the moiré potential spatially modulates the exchange, anisotropy, and Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interactions of an already magnetic van der Waals material such as CrI$_3$ or CrBr$_3$. The review assembles experiments and theory across chromium trihalides, twisted MoTe$_2$, and other heterostructures to support this synthesis. If this picture holds, moiré periodicity becomes a continuous design knob—set by twist angle, strain, gating, and electric fields—for creating new magnetic phases, low-energy and topological excitations, and spin-dependent transport.

What carries the argument

The central object is the moiré potential, the periodic potential $V(\mathbf{r})=\sum_{\mathbf{G}_m} V_{\mathbf{G}_m} e^{i\mathbf{G}_m\cdot\mathbf{r}}$ that arises from twist or lattice mismatch and acts on both electrons and spins. Its defining role is carried by the moiré-modulated spin Hamiltonian $H_{\mathrm{Spin}}=\sum_{\langle i,j\rangle} J_{ij}(\mathbf{r}_m)\,\mathbf{S}_i\cdot\mathbf{S}_j+\sum_i K_i(\mathbf{r}_m)(S_i^z)^2+\sum_{\langle i,j\rangle}\mathbf{D}_{ij}(\mathbf{r}_m)\cdot(\mathbf{S}_i\times\mathbf{S}_j)$, where the exchange, anisotropy, and Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interactions all become spatially periodic at the moiré length scale. This Hamiltonian is the machinery that generates the predicted coexisting magnetic domains, non-collinear spin textures, skyrmions, and moiré magnon bands; the effective Hamiltonian $H_{\mathrm{eff}}=H_0+H_{\mathrm{moire}}+H_{\mathrm{int}}$ plays the analogous role for magnetism induced in non-magnetic layers via flat-band correlations. The review uses these models as the common thread to organize the experimental and theoretical literature.

What would settle it

A direct falsifier would be a systematic measurement of the magnetic phase diagram of twisted bilayer CrI$_3$ or CrBr$_3$ as a function of twist angle at fixed temperature and field: if the magnetic domains, magnon spectrum, and phase-transition temperatures show no dependence on twist angle, or disagree with the moiré-modulated models across the full angle range, the central claim that the moiré potential controls magnetism would be refuted. A second decisive test is a local magnetic probe at a large twist angle where the models predict a transition to a uniform ferromagnet; observing persistent disordered domains there would contradict the picture.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the moiré potential does not merely perturb a two-dimensional magnet; it controls the magnetic state. In non-magnetic systems, when the moiré potential flattens electronic bands so that the kinetic energy scale $W$ falls below the interaction scale $U$, electrons order spins spontaneously, creating magnetism whose order parameter is tied to the moiré periodicity. In intrinsic 2D magnets, the moiré pattern spatially modulates the exchange coupling $J_{ij}(\mathbf{r}_m)$, the single-ion anisotropy $K_i(\mathbf{r}_m)$, and the Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya vector $\mathbf{D}_{ij}(\mathbf{r}_m)$, producing coexisting ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic domains, non-collinear textures, skyrmions, and moiré magnons. The review assembles the experimental evidence—single-spin magnetometry of twisted CrI$_3$, scanning tunneling spectroscopy of moiré magnons in CrBr$_3$, and transport and optical measurements in twisted MoTe$_2$ and other heterostructures—to argue that these effects are general and tunable, turning moiré periodicity into a practical control parameter for quantum matter.

Load-bearing premise

The review's synthesis stands on the accuracy of the key experiments it cites—the 2021 magnetic imaging that showed ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic domains in twisted CrI$_3$ and the 2023 microscope observation of moiré magnons in CrBr$_3$—and on the assumption that the simplified spin models used for these systems capture the essential physics.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Twisted CrI$_3$ and CrBr$_3$ bilayers realize coexisting ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic domains whose size, ordering, and relative stability are set by twist angle, gating, and applied electric field.
  • Moiré magnons and the one-dimensional magnon networks hosted by stacking domain walls become the dominant low-energy spin excitations, controlling spin and thermal transport in small-angle twisted magnets.
  • Moiré-modulated exchange frustration can stabilize skyrmions and skyrmion lattices in insulating materials even without strong Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction, with size and shape engineered by the moiré period.
  • Twisted multiferroic bilayers such as CrBr$_3$ and NiI$_2$ exhibit magnetoelectric coupling strong enough for electric-field control of skyrmions and their motion.
  • Moiré magnetic proximity effects generate spin-polarized miniband transport in semiconductor layers, and twisted antiferromagnetic bilayers show altermagnetic spin splitting without spin–orbit coupling, opening a nonrelativistic route to spintronics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An extension the review leaves implicit: because the mechanism is geometric rather than chemical, similar moiré control should operate in other layered magnets and in artificial spin-ice arrays, so the twist angle could serve as a continuous phase-diagram dial for families of materials beyond the chromium trihalides.
  • The scanning tunneling observation of moiré magnons in CrBr$_3$ suggests a route to directly test the predicted higher-order topological magnon insulators: measuring magnon spectra and local density of states in twisted bilayers with the same probe should reveal the predicted corner or edge states.
  • If moiré-stabilized skyrmions are robust at zero field and in insulators, strain-patterned moiré lattices in insulating ferromagnets could become a platform for skyrmion-based memory and logic without the heavy-metal interfaces currently used, though room-temperature operation remains an open question.
  • The synthetic Kondo lattice realized in 1T–TaS$_2$/2H–TaS$_2$-type moiré heterostructures implies that gating could tune between magnetic and heavy-fermion phases; a testable prediction is that resistance anomalies and magnetic domain patterns will shift with moiré periodicity as the Kondo coupling changes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review of magnetic moiré systems. It proposes a central organizing distinction between moiré-induced magnetism (in non-magnetic layers, arising from correlated flat bands) and moiré-modulated intrinsic atomic-scale magnetism (in magnetic layers whose pre-existing interactions are spatially modulated by the moiré potential). It surveys experimental and theoretical results on magnetic order, low-energy excitations, topological spin textures, exciton–magnon coupling, transport, and exotic phases such as spin liquids and Chern magnets, concluding that moiré potentials are a practical tuning knob for magnetic order and dynamics.

Significance. If the synthesis is accurate, the review provides a useful roadmap for a fast-moving field. Its clearest strength is the explicit conceptual taxonomy in Section 2.1 between induced and modulated magnetism, which helps organize a diverse literature. The coverage is broad and includes recent 2023–2025 works on twisted CrI3, CrBr3, NiI2, and TMD homobilayers. The paper does not present new derivations or machine-checked claims; its value lies in collecting and interpreting existing results. However, the unresolved tension around the twisted CrI3 experimental interpretation and several editorial gaps currently limit the review's reliability as a reference synthesis.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.3] The discussion of Song et al. [55] states that single-spin magnetometry revealed 'moiré magnetism in nanoscale domains and periodic magnetization patterns' while also describing 'coexistence of antiferromagnetic and ferromagnetic domains in a disorder-like pattern'; later in the same section the review acknowledges that fabrication procedures may cause stacking disorder that explains 'unresolved magnetic coupling that varies with thickness in CrI3' [72]. These statements are in direct tension: the central claim that moiré periodicity controls magnetism in twisted CrI3 depends on interpreting the observed domains as moiré-determined rather than as stacking-disorder-determined. The review should reconcile these descriptions and critically evaluate the alternative explanation, for example by specifying which observables in [55] and related twisted-CrI3 studies distinguish a moiré-periodic domain pattern from a disorder-dominated one.
  2. [§7, Figure 2] Figure 2 is introduced in the text as a 'Summary table comparing the emergent properties of several magnetic materials that exhibit moiré physics,' but the table itself is not present in the manuscript; only a caption appears. A comparative summary table is a substantive part of a review's contribution, so the missing table should be restored and its content integrated with the discussion, or the reference to it should be removed.
  3. [References] References [141] through [149] are listed in the bibliography but are not cited anywhere in the body of the text. This indicates either missing citations for claims that rely on those works or orphaned entries. The author should verify that every listed reference is cited at the appropriate point and that every claim is supported by a cited work.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§2.2] The sentence listing CrBrS, MnSe, MnBi2Te4, and Fe3GeTe2 is ambiguous: it is unclear whether 'the first two' refers to CrBrS and MnSe and 'the third' to MnBi2Te4, which would leave Fe3GeTe2 unclassified; please clarify the intended grouping.
  2. [§2.3 and §6] The heterostructure is referred to as 'BA' in reference [44] but as 'BAs' in Section 6; choose one notation and define the compound at first use.
  3. [§6] In the quantum spin-liquid paragraph, the sentence 'They show at the microscopic level that uniaxial strain affects exciton–magnon coupling [108] and magnon dispersion [29]' pairs the strain result with references [108] (Sell et al., 1967) and [29] (Hu and MacDonald), which do not appear to support that sentence; please correct the citation and rephrase the claim.
  4. [§2.3] The phrase 'controlled through doping by electrical gating' is imprecise; gating changes carrier density rather than chemical doping, so consider writing 'charge doping via electrical gating' or similar.
  5. [§3] The statement that stacking domain walls possess 'substantially higher energy than magnetic domain walls' is made without a reference or quantitative support; please add a citation or qualify the claim.
  6. [Abstract and §7] The term 'interfacial incongruity' is used in the abstract but not defined or used elsewhere; consider replacing it with 'lattice mismatch' or defining it explicitly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: this review synthesizes external literature without performing new derivations, fits, or predictions that reduce to their own inputs.

full rationale

This is a review article, not a derivation paper. Its organizing claim — that moiré potentials regulate magnetism in two-dimensional systems — is supported by summaries of externally published experiments and calculations (e.g., Song et al. 2021, Xie et al. 2022/2023, Ganguli et al. 2023, Hejazi et al. 2020), not by new equations fitted to data. The effective Hamiltonians in Section 2.1 (Eqs. 1 and 2) are stated as generic forms drawn from prior literature and are not used to generate novel predictions, so there is no fitted-input-called-prediction pattern. The author's own work appears once as reference [75] (Tapia, Cazor, and Mellado), cited for numerical results on twisted square bilayers of magnetic dipoles; this is a single self-citation that is not load-bearing for the review's central synthesis. The paper also candidly flags a limitation in Section 2.3: 'the procedures employed in sample fabrication influence the emergence of magnetic phases in the aforementioned moiré systems, and may be a possible explanation for the stacking disorder and the unresolved magnetic coupling that varies with thickness in CrI3.' This acknowledges an alternative (stacking disorder) to the moiré-control narrative, which is a scientific accuracy concern rather than a circularity concern, since the review does not define its central claim in terms of the cited experiments' conclusions by construction. No step reduces to its own input, and the score of 1 reflects only the presence of a minor, non-load-bearing self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

As a review, the paper introduces no free parameters or hypothetical entities. Its assumptions are the reliability of the cited literature and the adequacy of standard effective models for moiré magnetism.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption The cited experimental and theoretical results are accurate and correctly interpreted.
    The review's conclusions depend on trusting primary sources such as refs [55], [81], [97], and [120]; no independent verification is provided.
  • domain assumption The effective Hamiltonians in Section 2.1, H_eff = H0 + H_moire + H_int and the spin Hamiltonian of Eq. (2), capture the relevant physics of moiré magnets.
    The review uses these models to frame all following discussion, but does not derive or test them.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Magnetic Moir\'e Systems: a review." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WBU6KLAR

@misc{pith2026250605620,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Magnetic Moir\'e Systems: a review},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WBU6KLAR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.05620}
}
read the original abstract

This review synthesizes recent advancements in the study of moir\'e magnetism. This emerging field, at the intersection of twistronics, topology, and strongly correlated systems, explores novel phenomena that arise when moir\'e potentials influence the magnetism of two-dimensional systems. The manuscript presents recent advances highlighting the interfacial incongruity as a novel mechanism for regulating the magnetism of two-dimensional materials and for the manifestation of various phenomena in twisted and mismatched magnetic two-dimensional interfaces. The manuscript addresses seminal and recent experimental and theoretical advances associated with both small- and large-period magnetic moir\'e lattices, including novel magnetic phases, low-energy and topological magnetic excitations, magnetic and electronic transport, optical properties, phase transitions, and prospective applications of these materials. Moir\'e magnetism signifies a promising frontier for manipulating complex quantum states in quantum matter. The ongoing advances in this field are poised to impact condensed matter physics, materials science, and quantum information science.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.05620 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic representation of a) a trilayer structure composed of three square lattices stacked vertically. Black spheres represent atoms. b) Two illustrative methods for creating a moir´e pattern in a bilayer system: by introducing a relative in-plane mismatch δ between the layers (left) and by applying a relative twist between the layers at an angle θ to an orthogonal axis (right). c) Examples of two moir´e patterns… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Summary table comparing the emergent properties of several magnetic materials that exhibit moir´e physics.P, σ, and T denote inversion, mirror, and time reversal symmetry, respectively. harnessed to regulate skyrmions via electric fields [99]. Furthermore, the moir´e potential facilitates the propulsion of skyrmions via mechanisms such as domain walls anchored by the moir´e pattern, which serve as channels for skyrm… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

163 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages

  1. [141]

    Sheoran S and Bhattacharya S 2024 Physical Review Materials8 L051401

    work page 2024

  2. [149]

    Takagi H, Takayama T, Jackeli G, Khaliullin G and Nagler S E 2019 Nature Reviews Physics1 264–280

    work page 2019

  3. [129]

    2022 Nature Nanotechnology17 256–261

    Cenker J, Sivakumar S, Xie K, Miller A, Thijssen P, Liu Z, Dismukes A, Fonseca J, Anderson E, Zhu X et al. 2022 Nature Nanotechnology17 256–261

    work page 2022

  4. [130]

    2019 Nature 567 76–80

    Jin C, Regan E C, Yan A, Iqbal Bakti Utama M, Wang D, Zhao S, Qin Y, Yang S, Zheng Z, Shi S et al. 2019 Nature 567 76–80

    work page 2019

  5. [55]

    Fazekas P 1999 Lecture notes on electron correlation and magnetismvol 5 (World scientific)

    1999

  6. [72]

    2022 Nature Physics 18 30–36

    Xie H, Luo X, Ye G, Ye Z, Ge H, Sung S H, Rennich E, Yan S, Fu Y, Tian S et al. 2022 Nature Physics 18 30–36

    2022

  7. [1]

    Introduction Two-dimensional (2D) magnetic systems differ from three-dimensional (3D) and one- dimensional (1D) counterparts due to 1) enhanced quantum fluctuations from reduced dimensionality, 2) absence of long-range magnetic order without magnetic anisotropy [1, 2, 3], and 3) finite-temperature phase transitions driven by topological magnetic defects. ...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  8. [2]

    Moir´ e-induced Magnetic Orders 2.1. Magnetism induced at the moir´ e length scale versus Moir´ e-modulated intrinsic atomic-scale magnetism Moir´ e magnets induced at the moir´ e length scale are systems made out of individual layers that are non-magnetic. The magnetism in these systems arises due to strong electron-electron correlations in the flat band...

    2021

Show all 163 references
  1. [3]

    Moir´ e low energy excitations Bosonic phases in magnetic materials are of significant interest due to their neutral and topologically protected boundary modes, as well as their prospective applications in dissipationless magnonics and spintronics. The essential function of mo...

  2. [4]

    Their formation is generally attributed to mechanisms that induce chirality, such as DMI interaction, magnetic frustration, and various forms of magnetic anisotropy

    Topological moire spin textures Skyrmions represent some of the most prevalent topological defects in magnetic systems and have been observed or theorized in various configurations, including two-dimensional magnets, magnetic thin films, and material interfaces [95]. Their for...

  3. [5]

    Exciton-Magnon Coupling Most frequently, magnetic fields are used to modulate magnons, while strain has been shown to generate and control magnons via magnetostriction [106]. In TMD hetero-bilayers, excitons, arising from bound electron-hole pairs through the Coulomb interacti...

  4. [6]

    In the case of the long-sought quantum spin-liquid state, the differences between moir´ e material physics and the single-band Hubbard model have been recently studied

    Exotic phenomena in moire superlattices Moir´ e superlattices composed of magnetic materials have been demonstrated to be an outstanding platform for the investigation of unconventional phases of matter [78, 121, 122, 123, 38, 17, 120]. In the case of the long-sought quantum s...

  5. [7]

    Perspectives In this section, we examine a range of opportunities, challenges, and promising research directions that emerge from this dynamic field of study. From the perspective of practical applications, the finding that moir´ e fields, akin to antisymmetric interactions, c...

  6. [8]

    Concluding Remarks Magnetic moir´ e systems represent a fertile frontier in the investigation of correlated quantum states and topological excitations within two-dimensional systems, which is crucial for advancing our understanding of quantum materials. The superposition of sl...

  7. [9]

    Lee P A 2007 Reports on Progress in Physics71 012501

    2007

  8. [10]

    Jiang H C and Kivelson S A 2021 Physical Review Letters127 097002

    2021

  9. [11]

    Wei S, Liao X, Wang C, Li J, Zhang H, Zeng Y J, Linghu J, Jin H and Wei Y 2020 2D Materials 8 012005

    2020

  10. [12]

    Lines M 1969 Journal of Applied Physics40 1352–1358

    1969

  11. [13]

    Mattis D C 2006 Theory Of magnetism made simple, the: an introduction to physical concepts and to some useful mathematical methods(World Scientific Publishing Company)

    2006

  12. [14]

    Ramirez A 2001 Handbook of magnetic materials13 423–520

    2001

  13. [15]

    Vojta M 2018 Reports on Progress in Physics81 064501

    2018

  14. [16]

    Starykh O A 2015 Reports on Progress in Physics78 052502

    2015

  15. [17]

    Broholm C, Cava R J, Kivelson S, Nocera D, Norman M and Senthil T 2020Science 367 eaay0668

  16. [18]

    Savary L and Balents L 2016 Reports on Progress in Physics80 016502

    2016

  17. [19]

    2024 Physical Review X14 011004

    Tao Z, Shen B, Jiang S, Li T, Li L, Ma L, Zhao W, Hu J, Pistunova K, Watanabe K et al. 2024 Physical Review X14 011004

    2024

  18. [20]

    Shabani S, Halbertal D, Wu W, Chen M, Liu S, Hone J, Yao W, Basov D N, Zhu X and Pasupathy A N 2021 Nature Physics 17 720–725

    2021

  19. [21]

    Hermann K 2012 Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter24 314210

    2012

  20. [22]

    Andrei E Y, Efetov D K, Jarillo-Herrero P, MacDonald A H, Mak K F, Senthil T, Tutuc E, Yazdani A and Young A F 2021 Nature Reviews Materials6 201–206

    2021

  21. [23]

    Gonzalez-Arraga L A, Lado J, Guinea F and San-Jose P 2017 Physical review letters119 107201

    2017

  22. [24]

    Andrei E Y and MacDonald A H 2020 Nature materials 19 1265–1275

    2020

  23. [25]

    Sharpe A L, Fox E J, Barnard A W, Finney J, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Kastner M and Goldhaber-Gordon D 2019 Science 365 605–608

    2019

  24. [26]

    Liu C X, Zhang S C and Qi X L 2016 Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics7 301–321

    2016

  25. [27]

    Wang T, Devakul T, Zaletel M P and Fu L 2023 arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.02501

    2023 arXiv

  26. [28]

    Serlin M, Tschirhart C, Polshyn H, Zhang Y, Zhu J, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Balents L and Young A 2020 Science 367 900–903

    2020

  27. [29]

    to explore the possibility of achieving exotic spin-liquid states aided by moir´ e potentials. By employing Hartree-Fock theory and strong-coupling expansions, the metallic and insulating states in transition-metal dichalcogenide heterobilayers at one electron per moir´ e peri...

    2022

  28. [30]

    Hejazi K, Luo Z X and Balents L 2021 Physical Review B104 L100406

    2021

  29. [31]

    He F, Zhou Y, Ye Z, Cho S H, Jeong J, Meng X and Wang Y 2021 ACS nano 15 5944–5958

    2021

  30. [32]

    Yang B, Li Y, Xiang H, Lin H and Huang B 2023 Nature Computational Science3 314–320

    2023

  31. [33]

    Mentink J 2017 Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter29 453001 Magnetic Moir´ e Systems: a review 19

    2017

  32. [34]

    Zaliznyak I A 2003 Physical Review B68 134451

    2003

  33. [35]

    2024 Advanced Science11 2304792

    Ortiz Jimenez V, Pham Y T H, Zhou D, Liu M, Nugera F A, Kalappattil V, Eggers T, Hoang K, Duong D L, Terrones M et al. 2024 Advanced Science11 2304792

    2024

  34. [36]

    Soriano D, Katsnelson M I and Fern´ andez-Rossier J 2020 Nano Letters 20 6225–6234

    2020

  35. [37]

    Burch K S, Mandrus D and Park J G 2018 Nature 563 47–52

    2018

  36. [38]

    Hejazi K, Luo Z X and Balents L 2020 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences117 10721–10726

    2020

  37. [39]

    Hu N C and MacDonald A H 2021 Physical Review B104 214403

    2021

  38. [40]

    Sun W, Wang W, Yang C, Li X, Li H, Huang S and Cheng Z 2023 Physical Review B107 184439

    2023

  39. [41]

    Tong Q, Liu F, Xiao J and Yao W 2018 Nano letters 18 7194–7199

    2018

  40. [42]

    Hu Y and Du A 2023 Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials588 171374

    2023

  41. [43]

    Kim K M, Kiem D H, Bednik G, Han M J and Park M J 2022 arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.05264

    2022 arXiv

  42. [44]

    Wang C, Gao Y, Lv H, Xu X and Xiao D 2020 Physical Review Letters125 247201

    2020

  43. [45]

    2024 Nature communications15 5925

    Jang M, Lee S, Cantos-Prieto F, Koˇ si´ c I, Li Y, McCray A R, Jung M H, Yoon J Y, Boddapati L, Deepak F L et al. 2024 Nature communications15 5925

    2024

  44. [46]

    2024 Nature Communications 15 5712

    Li S, Sun Z, McLaughlin N J, Sharmin A, Agarwal N, Huang M, Sung S H, Lu H, Yan S, Lei H et al. 2024 Nature Communications 15 5712

    2024

  45. [47]

    Wu Y, Tong J, Deng L, Luo F, Tian F, Qin G and Zhang X 2023 Nano Letters 23 6226–6232

    2023

  46. [48]

    Debnath S, Dey S and Giri P 2025 ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

    2025

  47. [49]

    Mak K F and Shan J 2022 Nature Nanotechnology17 686–695

    2022

  48. [50]

    Wu Z, Yu J and Yuan S 2019 Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics21 7750–7755

    2019

  49. [51]

    Xue F, Wang Z, Hou Y, Gu L and Wu R 2020 Physical Review B101 184426

    2020

  50. [52]

    Kim J, Son S, Coak M J, Hwang I, Lee Y, Zhang K and Park J G 2020 Journal of Applied Physics 128

    2020

  51. [53]

    Behura S K, Miranda A, Nayak S, Johnson K, Das P and Pradhan N R 2021 Emergent Materials 4 813–826

    2021

  52. [54]

    Tong Q, Chen M and Yao W 2019 Physical Review Applied12 024031

    2019

  53. [56]

    Li X, Jiang S, Meng Q, Zuo H, Zhu Z, Balents L and Behnia K 2022 Physical Review B 106 L020402

    2022

  54. [57]

    2017 Nature 546 270–273

    Huang B, Clark G, Navarro-Moratalla E, Klein D R, Cheng R, Seyler K L, Zhong D, Schmidgall E, McGuire M A, Cobden D H et al. 2017 Nature 546 270–273

    2017

  55. [58]

    Chen W, Sun Z, Wang Z, Gu L, Xu X, Wu S and Gao C 2019 Science 366 983–987

    2019

  56. [59]

    Liu J, Sun Q, Kawazoe Y and Jena P 2016 Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics18 8777–8784

    2016

  57. [60]

    2024 Nature Communications 15 4982 Magnetic Moir´ e Systems: a review 20

    Yang B, Patel T, Cheng M, Pichugin K, Tian L, Sherlekar N, Yan S, Fu Y, Tian S, Lei H et al. 2024 Nature Communications 15 4982 Magnetic Moir´ e Systems: a review 20

    2024

  58. [61]

    Webster L and Yan J A 2018 Physical Review B98 144411

    2018

  59. [62]

    2023 Nature Physics 19 1150–1155

    Xie H, Luo X, Ye Z, Sun Z, Ye G, Sung S H, Ge H, Yan S, Fu Y, Tian S et al. 2023 Nature Physics 19 1150–1155

    2023

  60. [63]

    2019 Nature materials 18 1303–1308

    Li T, Jiang S, Sivadas N, Wang Z, Xu Y, Weber D, Goldberger J E, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Fennie C J et al. 2019 Nature materials 18 1303–1308

    2019

  61. [64]

    Soriano D, Cardoso C and Fern´ andez-Rossier J 2019 Solid State Communications299 113662

    2019

  62. [65]

    2021 Science 374 1140–1144

    Song T, Sun Q C, Anderson E, Wang C, Qian J, Taniguchi T, Watanabe K, McGuire M A, St¨ ohr R, Xiao D et al. 2021 Science 374 1140–1144

    2021

  63. [66]

    Sivadas N, Okamoto S, Xu X, Fennie C J and Xiao D 2018 Nano letters 18 7658–7664

    2018

  64. [67]

    Jiang P, Wang C, Chen D, Zhong Z, Yuan Z, Lu Z Y and Ji W 2019 Physical Review B99 144401

    2019

  65. [68]

    2019 Nature materials 18 1298–1302

    Song T, Fei Z, Yankowitz M, Lin Z, Jiang Q, Hwangbo K, Zhang Q, Sun B, Taniguchi T, Watanabe K et al. 2019 Nature materials 18 1298–1302

    2019

  66. [69]

    2022 Nature nanotechnology17 143–147

    Xu Y, Ray A, Shao Y T, Jiang S, Lee K, Weber D, Goldberger J E, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Muller D A et al. 2022 Nature nanotechnology17 143–147

    2022

  67. [70]

    2024 Physical Review B109 045420

    Ren M X, Zhang Y J, Gao Y M, Tian M Y, Jin C D, Zhang H, Lian R Q, Gong P L, Wang R N, Wang J L et al. 2024 Physical Review B109 045420

    2024

  68. [71]

    2018 Nature nanotechnology13 544–548

    Huang B, Clark G, Klein D R, MacNeill D, Navarro-Moratalla E, Seyler K L, Wilson N, McGuire M A, Cobden D H, Xiao D et al. 2018 Nature nanotechnology13 544–548

    2018

  69. [73]

    2023 Nature Electronics6 434–442

    Cheng G, Rahman M M, Allcca A L, Rustagi A, Liu X, Liu L, Fu L, Zhu Y, Mao Z, Watanabe K et al. 2023 Nature Electronics6 434–442

    2023

  70. [74]

    Liu Y and Petrovic C 2018 Physical Review B97 014420

    2018

  71. [75]

    Hauser J 1969 Physical Review 187 580

    1969

  72. [76]

    Bora M and Deb P 2021 Journal of Physics: Materials4 034014

    2021

  73. [77]

    Cardoso C, Costa A, MacDonald A and Fern´ andez-Rossier J 2023Physical Review B108 184423

  74. [78]

    2017 Science advances 3 e1603113

    Zhong D, Seyler K L, Linpeng X, Cheng R, Sivadas N, Huang B, Schmidgall E, Taniguchi T, Watanabe K, McGuire M A et al. 2017 Science advances 3 e1603113

    2017

  75. [79]

    2018 Nano letters 18 3823–3828

    Seyler K L, Zhong D, Huang B, Linpeng X, Wilson N P, Taniguchi T, Watanabe K, Yao W, Xiao D, McGuire M A et al. 2018 Nano letters 18 3823–3828

    2018

  76. [80]

    Gonz´ alez-Tudela A and Cirac J I 2019Physical Review A100 053604

  77. [81]

    Parkin S 1993 Physical review letters71 1641

    1993

  78. [82]

    Schneeloch J A, Aczel A A, Ye F and Louca D 2024 Physical Review B110 144439

    2024

  79. [83]

    Anderson E, Fan F R, Cai J, Holtzmann W, Taniguchi T, Watanabe K, Xiao D, Yao W and Xu X 2023 Science 381 325–330

    2023

  80. [84]

    Shindou R, Ohe J i, Matsumoto R, Murakami S and Saitoh E 2013Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics87 174402

  81. [85]

    Tapia I, Cazor X and Mellado P 2024 Advanced Physics Research3 2300135

    2024

  82. [86]

    2021 Nature communications12 5339

    Ding L, Xu X, Jeschke H O, Bai X, Feng E, Alemayehu A S, Kim J, Huang F T, Zhang Q, Ding X et al. 2021 Nature communications12 5339

    2021

  83. [87]

    Zimmermann A S, Meier D and Fiebig M 2014 Nature communications5 4796

    2014

  84. [88]

    Begum Popy R, Frank J and Stamps R L 2022 Journal of Applied Physics132

    2022

  85. [89]

    Kennes D M, Claassen M, Xian L, Georges A, Millis A J, Hone J, Dean C R, Basov D, Pasupathy A N and Rubio A 2021 Nature Physics 17 155–163

    2021

  86. [90]

    In this model, the topology of the bilayer depends on the interlayer exchange coupling [90]

    was proposed as an ideal platform for second-order topological magnon insulators in the absence of DMI. In this model, the topology of the bilayer depends on the interlayer exchange coupling [90]. In addition, a second-order topological magnon insulator with topologically prot...

  87. [91]

    Ganguli S C, Aapro M, Kezilebieke S, Amini M, Lado J L and Liljeroth P 2023 Nano Letters 23 3412–3417

    2023

  88. [92]

    Edelberg D, Kumar H, Shenoy V, Ochoa H and Pasupathy A N 2020Nature Physics16 1097–1102

  89. [93]

    Abdul-Wahab D, Iacocca E, Evans R F, Bedoya-Pinto A, Parkin S, Novoselov K S and Santos E J 2021 Applied Physics Reviews8

    2021

  90. [94]

    Bhowmik S, Banerjee S and Saha A 2024 Physical Review B109 104417

    2024

  91. [95]

    Li Y M, Wu Y J, Luo X W, Huang Y and Chang K 2022 Physical Review B106 054403

    2022

  92. [96]

    Mook A, D ´ ıaz S A, Klinovaja J and Loss D 2021Physical Review B104 024406

  93. [97]

    McClarty P A 2022 Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics13 171–190

    2022

  94. [98]

    Zhuo F, Kang J, Manchon A and Cheng Z 2025 Advanced Physics Research4 2300054

    2025

  95. [99]

    Kuepferling M, Casiraghi A, Soares G, Durin G, Garcia-Sanchez F, Chen L, Back C H, Marrows C H, Tacchi S and Carlotti G 2023 Reviews of Modern Physics95 015003

    2023

  96. [100]

    Hua C B, Xiao F, Liu Z R, Sun J H, Gao J H, Chen C Z, Tong Q, Zhou B and Xu D H 2023 Physical Review B107 L020404

    2023

  97. [101]

    Sil A and Ghosh A K 2020 Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter32 205601

    2020

  98. [102]

    Hirosawa T, Diaz S A, Klinovaja J and Loss D 2020 Physical review letters125 207204

    2020

  99. [103]

    2023 Physical Review X13 021016

    Wang H, Madami M, Chen J, Jia H, Zhang Y, Yuan R, Wang Y, He W, Sheng L, Zhang Y et al. 2023 Physical Review X13 021016

    2023

  100. [104]

    Lucassen J, Meijer M J, Kurnosikov O, Swagten H J, Koopmans B, Lavrijsen R, Kloodt-Twesten F, Fr¨ omter R and Duine R A 2019Physical review letters123 157201

  101. [105]

    Finocchio G, B¨ uttner F, Tomasello R, Carpentieri M and Kl¨ aui M 2016 Journal of Physics D: Magnetic Moir´ e Systems: a review 21 Applied Physics 49 423001

    2016

  102. [106]

    Kim K M and Kim S K 2024 arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.05616

    2024 arXiv

  103. [107]

    Akram M, LaBollita H, Dey D, Kapeghian J, Erten O and Botana A S 2021 Nano Letters 21 6633–6639

    2021

  104. [108]

    Fumega A O and Lado J L 2023 2D Materials 10 025026

    2023

  105. [109]

    Huang K, Shao D F and Tsymbal E Y 2022 Nano Letters 22 3349–3355

    2022

  106. [110]

    Sun W, Wang W, Hu R, Yang C, Li L, Huang S, Li X and Cheng Z 2023 ACS Applied Nano Materials 6 17021–17030

    2023

  107. [111]

    2022 Nature 602 601–605

    Song Q, Occhialini C A, Erge¸ cen E, Ilyas B, Amoroso D, Barone P, Kapeghian J, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Botana A S et al. 2022 Nature 602 601–605

    2022

  108. [112]

    Ant˜ ao T V, Lado J L and Fumega A O 2024 Nano Letters 24 15767–15773

    2024

  109. [113]

    Jin Z, Zeng Z, Cao Y and Yan P 2024 Physical Review Letters133 196701

    2024

  110. [114]

    Zhang X, Zhou Y and Ezawa M 2016 Nature communications7 10293

    2016

  111. [115]

    2017 Nature Physics 13 162–169

    Jiang W, Zhang X, Yu G, Zhang W, Wang X, Benjamin Jungfleisch M, Pearson J E, Cheng X, Heinonen O, Wang K L et al. 2017 Nature Physics 13 162–169

    2017

  112. [116]

    Lee E W 1955 Reports on progress in physics18 184

    1955

  113. [117]

    Scholes G D and Rumbles G 2006 Nature materials 5 683–696

    2006

  114. [118]

    Sell D D, Greene R and White R M 1967 Physical Review 158 489

    1967

  115. [119]

    2023 Physical Review Letters131 256504

    Klaproth T, Aswartham S, Shemerliuk Y, Selter S, Janson O, van den Brink J, B¨ uchner B, Knupfer M, Pazek S, Mikhailova D et al. 2023 Physical Review Letters131 256504

    2023

  116. [120]

    2023 Nature Nanotechnology18 23–28

    Diederich G M, Cenker J, Ren Y, Fonseca J, Chica D G, Bae Y J, Zhu X, Roy X, Cao T, Xiao D et al. 2023 Nature Nanotechnology18 23–28

    2023

  117. [121]

    Freeman S and Hopfield J 1968 Physical Review Letters21 910

    1968

  118. [122]

    Wang Z, Zhang X X, Shiomi Y, Arima T h, Nagaosa N, Tokura Y and Ogawa N 2023 Physical Review Research5 L042032

    2023

  119. [123]

    2022 Nature 604 468–473

    Wang X, Xiao C, Park H, Zhu J, Wang C, Taniguchi T, Watanabe K, Yan J, Xiao D, Gamelin D R et al. 2022 Nature 604 468–473

    2022

  120. [124]

    Zhang Y, Kim H, Zhang W, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Gao Y, Maruyama M, Okada S, Shinokita K and Matsuda K 2022 Advanced Materials34 2200301

    2022

  121. [125]

    Ziebel M E, Feuer M L, Cox J, Zhu X, Dean C R and Roy X 2024 Nano Letters 24 4319–4329

    2024

  122. [126]

    Liu N, Wang C, Zhang Y, Pang F, Cheng Z, Zhang Y and Ji W 2024 Physical Review B 109 214422

    2024

  123. [127]

    Shi J, Wang D, Jiang N, Xin Z, Zheng H, Shen C, Zhang X and Liu X 2024 arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.18437

    2024 arXiv

  124. [128]

    2022 Nature 609 282–286

    Bae Y J, Wang J, Scheie A, Xu J, Chica D G, Diederich G M, Cenker J, Ziebel M E, Bai Y, Ren H et al. 2022 Nature 609 282–286

    2022

  125. [131]

    Das J and Erten O 2025 Physical Review B111 184406

    2025

  126. [132]

    2024 Nature communications15 10252

    Regan E C, Lu Z, Wang D, Zhang Y, Devakul T, Nie J H, Zhang Z, Zhao W, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T et al. 2024 Nature communications15 10252

    2024

  127. [133]

    Akif Keskiner M, Ghaemi P, Oktel M O and Erten O 2024 Nano Letters 24 8575–8579

    2024

  128. [134]

    Nagaosa N, Sinova J, Onoda S, MacDonald A H and Ong N P 2010 Reviews of modern physics 82 1539–1592

    2010

  129. [135]

    2023 Nature Physics 19 807–813

    Tschirhart C, Redekop E, Li L, Li T, Jiang S, Arp T, Sheekey O, Taniguchi T, Watanabe K, Huber M et al. 2023 Nature Physics 19 807–813

    2023

  130. [136]

    Zhou W T, Dong Z Y, Gu Z L and Li J X 2025 arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.10991

    2025 arXiv

  131. [137]

    Zhang J, Triola C and Rossi E 2014 Physical review letters112 096802

    2014

  132. [138]

    Gong Z, Zhang Q Q, Mu H Y, An X T and Liu J J 2024 Physical Review B109 045301 Magnetic Moir´ e Systems: a review 22

    2024

  133. [139]

    ˇSmejkal L, Sinova J and Jungwirth T 2022 Phys. Rev. X 12(3) 031042 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.12.031042

    2022 doi

  134. [140]

    Mazin I and editors P 2022 Altermagnetism—a new punch line of fundamental magnetism

    2022

  135. [142]

    Liu Y, Yu J and Liu C C 2024 Physical Review Letters133 206702

    2024

  136. [143]

    Coleman P, Ioffe L and Tsvelik A M 1995 Physical Review B52 6611

    1995

  137. [144]

    Guerci D, Lucht K P, Cr´ epel V, Cano J, Pixley J and Millis A 2024 Physical Review B 110 165128

    2024

  138. [145]

    Zhao W, Shen B, Tao Z, Han Z, Kang K, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Mak K F and Shan J 2023 Nature 616 61–65

    2023

  139. [146]

    2024 Nature Physics 20 1772–1777

    Zhao W, Shen B, Tao Z, Kim S, Kn¨ uppel P, Han Z, Zhang Y, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Chowdhury D et al. 2024 Nature Physics 20 1772–1777

    2024

  140. [147]

    Xie F, Chen L and Si Q 2024 Physical Review Research6 013219

    2024

  141. [148]

    Leeb V, Polyudov K, Mashhadi S, Biswas S, Valent ´ ı R, Burghard M and Knolle J 2021 Physical Review Letters 126 097201

    2021

  142. [150]

    Liu H 2021 International Journal of Modern Physics B35 2130006

    2021

  143. [151]

    Ge M, Wang H, Wu J, Si C, Zhang J and Zhang S 2022 npj Computational Materials8 32

    2022

  144. [152]

    He W Y, Goldhaber-Gordon D and Law K T 2020 Nature communications11 1650

    2020

  145. [153]

    Wang C, Zhang X W, Liu X, He Y, Xu X, Ran Y, Cao T and Xiao D 2024 Physical Review Letters 132 036501

    2024

  146. [154]

    Farooq M U and Hong J 2019 npj 2D Materials and Applications3 3

    2019

  147. [155]

    Liu X, Song C, Wu Z, Wang J, Pan J and Li C 2020 Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics53 385002

    2020

  148. [156]

    2022 ACS nano 16 12656–12665

    Pawbake A, Pelini T, Delhomme A, Romanin D, Vaclavkova D, Martinez G, Calandra M, Measson M A, Veis M, Potemski M et al. 2022 ACS nano 16 12656–12665

    2022

  149. [157]

    Maity S, Das S, Palit M, Dey K, Das B, Kundu T, Paramanik R, De B K, Kunwar H S and Datta S 2025 Physical Review B111 L140407

    2025

  150. [158]

    Li J, Li Y, Du S, Wang Z, Gu B L, Zhang S C, He K, Duan W and Xu Y 2019 Science advances 5 eaaw5685

    2019

  151. [159]

    Xiao C, Tang J, Zhao P, Tong Q and Yao W 2020 Physical Review B102 125409

    2020

  152. [160]

    Shaban P, Lobanov I, Uzdin V and Iorsh I 2023 Physical Review B108 174440

    2023

  153. [161]

    Balents L, Dean C R, Efetov D K and Young A F 2020 Nature Physics 16 725–733

    2020

  154. [162]

    Adak P C, Sinha S, Agarwal A and Deshmukh M M 2024 Nature Reviews Materials9 481–498

    2024

  155. [163]

    Kezilebieke S, Vano V, Huda M N, Aapro M, Ganguli S C, Liljeroth P and Lado J L 2022 Nano letters 22 328–333

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.