Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Potentials of Green Coding -- Findings and Recommendations for Industry, Education and Science -- Extended Paper

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.18227 v1 pith:WDHQAPUE submitted 2024-02-28 cs.SE

classification cs.SE
keywords softwaregreencodingeducationexistingfindingssustainabilitysustainable
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Progressing digitalization and increasing demand and use of software cause rises in energy- and resource consumption from information and communication technologies (ICT). This raises the issue of sustainability in ICT, which increasingly includes the sustainability of the software products themselves and the art of creating sustainable software. To this end, we conducted an analysis to gather and present existing literature on three research questions relating to the production of ecologically sustainable software ("Green Coding") and to provide orientation for stakeholders approaching the subject. We compile the approaches to Green Coding and Green Software Engineering (GSE) that have been published since 2010. Furthermore, we considered ways to integrate the findings into existing industrial processes and higher education curricula to influence future development in an environmentally friendly way.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Generating Energy-Efficient Code via Large-Language Models -- Where are we now?

    cs.SE 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Across 363 solutions on three hardware platforms, no LLM consistently matched a green software expert's energy efficiency, though some LLM-prompt combinations beat ordinary human code.

Pith tools