Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 2 cited by

Genus-2 Holographic Correlator on $AdS_5 \times S^5$ from Localization

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that derivatives of the mass-deformed sphere free energy, computed to all orders by topological recursion, fix the $R^4$ and $D^4R^4$ terms in the AdS5×S5 holographic correlator at all genera, including the first nonzero…

desk verdict The genus-two D4R4 numbers are credible and the topological-recursion technique is the real contribution; the 1-loop constant and spin-analyticity claim need one more displayed computation before they are fully load-bearing. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.05247 v4 pith:WDQCDEZ6 submitted 2019-08-14 hep-th

Shai M. Chester This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th PACS 11.25.Tq
keywords holographiccorrelatorsN=4super-Yang-MillsAdS5/CFT4supersymmetriclocalizationtopologicalrecursiongenusexpansionR4andD4R4correctionsspinanalyticity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks how much of the strongly coupled holographic four-point function in N=4 super-Yang-Mills can be pinned down without constructing Witten diagrams. The author shows that derivatives of the mass-deformed sphere free energy, computable by supersymmetric localization, determine the integrated correlator, and that this quantity can be expanded to any order in $1/N^2$ using topological recursion on a free Gaussian matrix model. That single constraint, together with the flat-space limit of the ten-dimensional IIB S-matrix, fixes the $R^4$ and $D^4R^4$ contact terms in the holographic correlator at all genus, including the first nonzero genus-two term at $1/N^6$. The same computation completes the one-loop supergravity term and indicates that analyticity in spin fails at zero spin. These are the first holographic-correlator data at two orders beyond the planar limit at strong coupling.

What carries the argument

The central object is the resolvent expansion $W_n^m$ of the Gaussian matrix model: connected eigenvalue correlation functions organized by a 'genus' expansion, generated by the topological-recursion formulas (3.10)-(3.12). The load-bearing identity is the integrated constraint (2.16), which equates the $S^4$ integral of the reduced correlator with a combination of derivatives of the mass-deformed free energy, evaluated at zero mass. Because the undeformed model is Gaussian, the relevant two-body expectation value becomes products of inverse Laplace transforms of resolvents, namely Bessel functions, so the whole $1/N^2$ expansion is computable to arbitrary order and then expanded in powers of $1/\lambda$.

What would settle it

Recompute the integral of the explicit position-space one-loop term from [25] with controlled error bars and re-derive the $U^2\log U\log V$ coefficient from the Appendix A Mellin sums: if the integral is not $5/32$ or the coefficient is not $-171+8\pi^2$, then $B^{SG|SG}_0=15/4$ is a counterterm artifact. Separately, recompute the genus-two topological-recursion term $\tilde{F}_2$ and its Mellin-Barnes expansion: unless the resulting $O(\lambda^{3/2})$ coefficient of $F_2$ is exactly $1/24576$, the genus-two D4R4 coefficients $B^2_2=7/3072$ and $B^2_0=-7/1024$ fail.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that the mass-deformed N=2* sphere free energy, differentiated twice in mass and once in the coupling, can be computed to any order in $1/N^2$ from the free Gaussian matrix model by topological recursion; this all-orders constraint fixes the $R^4$ coefficient of the holographic stress-tensor correlator at genus zero and genus one and forces all higher-genus $R^4$ terms to vanish. Combined with the flat-space limit of the IIB S-matrix, it fixes $D^4R^4$ at all orders, the first nontrivial higher-genus contribution being genus-two, with Mellin coefficients $B^2_2=7/3072$ and $B^2_0=-7/1024$ at order $c^{-3}\lambda^{3/2}$. It also fixes the constant ambiguity in the one-loop supergravity term to $B^{SG|SG}_0=15/4$, completing the one-loop derivation and showing that spin analyticity of the lowest-twist double-trace anomalous dimension fails at zero spin.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the numerically evaluated integral $I[T^{SG|SG}]$ is exactly $5/32$ and that the counterterm convention in Appendix A really matches the position-space one-loop term; if either is wrong, the value $B^{SG|SG}_0=15/4$ and the spin-analyticity conclusion do not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The $R^4$ correction is fully fixed at strong coupling: only the genus-zero coefficient $120\zeta(3)$ and the genus-one coefficient $5/8$ are nonzero, so no higher-genus $R^4$ terms remain to be found.
  • The $D^4R^4$ correction is fixed to all orders in the genus expansion, with genus-two Mellin coefficients $B^2_2=7/3072$ and $B^2_0=-7/1024$, giving the first known $O(c^{-3})$ term in the holographic correlator.
  • The one-loop supergravity contribution is completed, and the lowest-twist double-trace anomalous dimension at $O(c^{-2})$ is non-analytic in spin at $j=0$, settling the earlier conjecture in the direction predicted by the Lorentzian inversion formula.
  • The flat-space limit provides a genus-one check of AdS5/CFT4: the $R^4$ coefficient computed from localization agrees with the IIB S-matrix.
  • Unprotected CFT data, including anomalous dimensions of low-spin double-trace operators, can be extracted to order $c^{-3}$, with explicit spin-zero and spin-two terms given in the paper.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: the same resolvent machinery should apply to SO(N) and Sp(N) gauge groups, whose zero-mass matrix models are also Gaussian, giving analogous all-genus constraints and a check of whether the $R^4$ and $D^4R^4$ coefficients depend on the gauge group.
  • Inference: if the spin-analyticity failure at $j=0$ is regulator-independent, the anomalous dimension at $O(c^{-2})$ is a concrete numerical prediction that could be compared with independent bootstrap methods.
  • Inference: the finite-N orthogonal-polynomial expression could serve as a non-perturbative constraint that fixes the complexified gauge coupling in the numerical conformal bootstrap of N=4 SYM, rather than only the central charge.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies the four-point function of the stress-tensor multiplet superprimary in N=4 SYM at strong coupling and large N, using supersymmetric localization and the flat-space limit of the dual IIB string amplitude. The main technical development is a topological-recursion computation of the integrated correlator constraint (the second derivative of the mass-deformed S4 free energy) to higher orders in 1/N, cross-checked at finite N with orthogonal polynomials. The authors use this constraint, together with the known IIB S-matrix, to fix the genus-one R4 coefficient, the constant ambiguity of the 1-loop supergravity term, and the genus-two D4R4 coefficients in the holographic correlator. The quoted Mellin amplitude is given in Eq. (4.1), with the genus-two D4R4 terms B2_2 = 7/3072 and B2_0 = -7/1024, and the 1-loop constant B_SG|SG_0 = 15/4, which the paper interprets as a failure of analyticity in spin at j=0.

Significance. If the results hold, this is a significant advance: the genus-two D4R4 term is the first holographic correlator data at two orders beyond the planar limit at strong coupling, and the all-orders-in-genus statements for R4 and D4R4 are structurally new. The topological-recursion derivation is explicit and the finite-N orthogonal-polynomial check in Table 1 is a genuine nontrivial cross-check. The flat-space matching of the genus-one R4 coefficient with the IIB S-matrix provides an independent consistency test. The main weakness is that the 1-loop constant B_SG|SG_0 = 15/4 and the resulting analyticity-in-spin conclusion rest on a numerically evaluated integral I[T^SG|SG] = 5/32 that is reported without error bars or a fully documented convention match. The genus-two D4R4 coefficients are fixed by independent constraints and do not depend on that numerical step, so the central claim of the paper is defensible but requires revision of the supporting evidence.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4.1, Eq. (4.2)] The value I[T^SG|SG] = 5/32 is load-bearing for the quoted 1-loop constant B_SG|SG_0 = 15/4 and for the claim that analyticity in spin fails at zero spin. The manuscript only states that this value was obtained by evaluating the integral numerically to high precision using an explicit position-space expression supplied privately by H. Paul, with no error estimate, code, or independent confirmation. Since the integrated constraint gives B_SG|SG_0 = 40(I[T^SG|SG] - 1/16), a numerical error of size delta in I shifts B_SG|SG_0 by 40 delta, and the zero-spin non-analyticity conclusion would fail precisely if delta = -3/32. Please provide the numerical integral with a quantitative error estimate or an analytic evaluation, and make the position-space expression available for independent verification.
  2. [Appendix A] The convention matching between MSG|SG and T^SG|SG is not fully demonstrated. The appendix computes the U^2 logU logV coefficient (-171 + 8*pi^2) and states that this 'can be matched' with [25], but it does not display the comparison, and it checks only a log-log coefficient. Because B_SG|SG_0 is precisely the coefficient of the M0 counterterm ambiguity, establishing that the MSG|SG normalization is that of [25] requires a scheme-defining comparison, not only a single logarithmic term. Please show the full matching procedure or otherwise specify the exact convention used to define the constant part.
  3. [Section 4.1, Eq. (4.4)] The three displayed D4R4 equations are mutually inconsistent if read as constraints on the same pair of coefficients: the first and third equations cannot both hold, and the relation B2_0 = -16 B2_2/7 is not satisfied by the final values, since B2_0 = -3 B2_2 at both genus-zero (630*zeta(5), -1890*zeta(5)) and genus-two (7/3072, -7/1024). The missing genus labels on the coefficients make the derivation unreadable. Please rewrite the system with explicit genus superscripts and correct the erroneous relation.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.1] The text says the free-energy derivative is computed 'to any order in 1/N', but the explicit results are given only through O(N^-6). This is acceptable as a method claim, but the presentation should state clearly which orders are explicitly exhibited and which are merely in principle accessible via the recursion.
  2. [Table 1] The numerical comparison in Table 1 should state the numerical integration method used for the omega integrals and the precision of the finite-N orthogonal-polynomial evaluation, so that the quoted agreement (down to 10^-14 or 10^-6 depending on the row) can be reproduced.
  3. [Section 4.2] The phrase 'using the flat space limit and localization we then fix D4R4' is accurate for the coefficients, but the title and abstract could be slightly misleading: the genus-two D4R4 result uses the flat-space IIB S-matrix as an essential input, not localization alone.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the Mellin coefficients are fixed from independent localization matrix-model data and the known IIB S-matrix; the numerical input I[T^SG|SG]=5/32 is an external integral, not a fitted target.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained against external inputs. The integrated constraint (2.16) is taken from [1], but that relation is an independently derived equality between the integrated stress-tensor correlator and derivatives of the mass-deformed S^4 free energy; it does not assume the Mellin coefficients B. The free-energy side is then computed from the Gaussian matrix model by topological recursion (Sec. 3), and checked at finite N by orthogonal polynomials, so the O(c^-2) and O(c^-3) constraints are independent of the correlator coefficients being solved for. The flat-space side uses the known IIB S-matrix coefficients (1.2), again independent. The coefficients in (4.4)-(4.6) are solutions of these linear constraints rather than renamings of inputs. The one soft point, I[T^SG|SG]=5/32 from a numerical integral of the [25] position-space expression, is an honest external input with no error bar; if wrong it would change B_SG|SG_0 (and the analyticity-in-spin conclusion), but that is a correctness/robustness risk, not circularity. The self-citation to [1] is load-bearing as a relation, but it is a prior independent derivation and therefore counts as real evidence under the rules.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the prior integrated constraint (2.16), the standard holographic dictionary, known IIB S-matrix coefficients, and the paper's own numerical and unshown matching steps. No free physical parameters are fitted; the only hand-chosen objects are the one-loop regulator convention dmn and C, which is non-unique but fixed by convention.

free parameters (1)
  • 1-loop supergravity regulator convention (dmn, C) = dmn = 9mn/(2(m+n)^3), C = 45 zeta(3) - 2159/96 - 37 pi^2/8
    Chosen non-uniquely in Eq. (2.15) to define MSG|SG; shifts in these constants are absorbed into B_SG|SG_0. The paper fixes them by matching to T_SG|SG in Appendix A, but that matching is not fully shown.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Integrated constraint (2.16) from [1] maps the integrated SSSS correlator to derivatives of the N=2* sphere free energy to all orders in 1/N.
    Prior result by Binder, Chester, Pufu, and Wang; this paper does not rederive it, and all localization constraints inherit it.
  • domain assumption AdS/CFT dictionary (1.3) and flat space limit formula (2.8) translate Mellin amplitudes to the known IIB S-matrix.
    Standard holographic dictionary; the flat space limit is used to fix leading s,t coefficients.
  • domain assumption The strong-coupling Mellin amplitude has exactly the structure (1.4): polynomial contact terms of degree 0 or 2 and a non-analytic one-loop term MSG|SG with one constant ambiguity.
    Relies on large N counting, Mellin analyticity, and unitarity; if additional polynomial terms exist at the same order, the constraints would be incomplete.
  • domain assumption The IIB S-matrix coefficients f^1_R4 and f^2_D4R4 in (1.2) are known and protected as stated.
    Input from string perturbation theory, cited to [54,55]; used as an external benchmark.
  • standard math Topological recursion and inverse Laplace transform contour manipulations (3.5)-(3.12) give the all-orders 1/N^2 expansion of the Gaussian matrix model expectation value.
    Standard random matrix theory applied to the resolvent expansion; the non-polynomial operator is handled via its inverse Laplace representation.
  • ad hoc to paper Numerical evaluation I[T^SG|SG] = 5/32 and Appendix A matching fix the counterterm convention.
    Load-bearing for B_SG|SG_0; the error estimate and the detailed matching computation are not shown in the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Genus-2 Holographic Correlator on $AdS_5 \times S^5$ from Localization." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WDQCDEZ6

@misc{pith2026190805247,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Genus-2 Holographic Correlator on $AdS_5 \times S^5$ from Localization},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WDQCDEZ6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.05247}
}
abstract

We consider the four-point function of the stress tensor multiplet superprimary in $\mathcal{N}=4$ super-Yang-Mills (SYM) with gauge group $SU(N)$ in the large $N$ and large 't Hooft coupling $\lambda\equiv g_\text{YM}^2N$ limit, which is holographically dual to the genus expansion of IIB string theory on $AdS_5\times S^5$. In \cite{Binder:2019jwn} it was shown that the integral of this correlator is related to derivatives of the mass deformed $\mathcal{N}=2^*$ sphere free energy, which was computed using supersymmetric localization to leading order in $1/N^2$ for finite $\lambda$. We generalize this computation to any order in $1/N^2$ for finite $\lambda$ using topological recursion, and use this any order constraint to fix the $R^4$ correction to the holographic correlator to any order in the genus expansion. We also use it to complete the derivation of the 1-loop supergravity correction, and show that analyticity in spin fails at zero spin in the large $N$ expansion as predicted from the Lorentzian inversion formula. In the flat space limit, the $R^4$ term in the holographic correlator matches that of the IIB S-matrix in 10d, which is a precise check of AdS$_5$/CFT$_4$ for local operators at genus-one. Using the flat space limit and localization we then fix $D^4R^4$ in the holographic correlator to any order in the genus expansion, which is nontrivial at genus-two, i.e. $1/N^6$. This is the first result at two orders beyond the planar limit at strong coupling for a holographic correlator.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Extremal couplings, graviton exchange, and gluon scattering in AdS

    hep-th 2025-05 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    Extremal bulk couplings between graviton and gluon modes are computed in F-theory AdS/CFT, yielding the graviton exchange term and a complete 1/N² correlator for the D4 theory.

  2. Bootstrapping form factor squared in ${\cal N}=4$ super-Yang-Mills

    hep-th 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A bootstrap using soft and collinear limits fixes the tree-level form factor squared in planar N=4 SYM up to N=6, unifying loop integrands from two-point master diagrams.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [25]

    Quantum Gravity from Conformal Field Theory,

    F. Aprile, J. M. Drummond, P. Heslop, and H. Paul, “Quantum Gravity from Conformal Field Theory,” JHEP 01 (2018) 035, 1706.02822

    arXiv 2018

  2. [1]

    N = 4 Super-Yang-Mills Correlators at Strong Coupling from String Theory and Localization,

    D. J. Binder, S. M. Chester, S. S. Pufu, and Y. Wang, “ N = 4 Super-Yang-Mills Correlators at Strong Coupling from String Theory and Localization,” 1902.06263

    arXiv 1902

  3. [2]

    The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,

    J. M. Maldacena, “The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38 (1999) 1113–1133, hep-th/9711200. [Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2,231(1998)]

    arXiv 1999

  4. [3]

    Partial nonrenormalization of the stress tensor four point function in N = 4 SYM and AdS / CFT,

    B. Eden, A. C. Petkou, C. Schubert, and E. Sokatchev, “Partial nonrenormalization of the stress tensor four point function in N = 4 SYM and AdS / CFT,” Nucl.Phys. B607 (2001) 191–212, hep-th/0009106

    arXiv 2001

  5. [4]

    Correlation functions and massive Kaluza-Klein modes in the AdS / CFT correspondence,

    G. Arutyunov, F. A. Dolan, H. Osborn, and E. Sokatchev, “Correlation functions and massive Kaluza-Klein modes in the AdS / CFT correspondence,” Nucl. Phys. B665 (2003) 273–324, hep-th/0212116

    arXiv 2003

  6. [5]

    On a large N degeneracy in N=4 SYM and the AdS / CFT correspondence,

    G. Arutyunov and E. Sokatchev, “On a large N degeneracy in N=4 SYM and the AdS / CFT correspondence,” Nucl. Phys. B663 (2003) 163–196, hep-th/0301058

    arXiv 2003

  7. [6]

    Four-point functions of different-weight operators in the AdS/CFT correspondence,

    L. Berdichevsky and P. Naaijkens, “Four-point functions of different-weight operators in the AdS/CFT correspondence,” JHEP 01 (2008) 071, 0709.1365

    arXiv 2008

  8. [7]

    Four-point correlators with higher weight superconformal primaries in the AdS/CFT Correspondence,

    L. I. Uruchurtu, “Four-point correlators with higher weight superconformal primaries in the AdS/CFT Correspondence,” JHEP 03 (2009) 133, 0811.2320. 30

    arXiv 2009

Show all 93 references
  1. [8]

    Next-next-to-extremal Four Point Functions of N=4 1/2 BPS Operators in the AdS/CFT Correspondence,

    L. I. Uruchurtu, “Next-next-to-extremal Four Point Functions of N=4 1/2 BPS Operators in the AdS/CFT Correspondence,” JHEP 08 (2011) 133, 1106.0630

    2011 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Towards 4-point correlation functions of any 1 2 -BPS operators from supergravity,

    G. Arutyunov, S. Frolov, R. Klabbers, and S. Savin, “Towards 4-point correlation functions of any 1 2 -BPS operators from supergravity,” JHEP 04 (2017) 005, 1701.00998

    2017 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Four-point functions of 1/2-BPS operators of any weights in the supergravity approximation,

    G. Arutyunov, R. Klabbers, and S. Savin, “Four-point functions of 1/2-BPS operators of any weights in the supergravity approximation,” JHEP 09 (2018) 118, 1808.06788

    2018 arXiv

  4. [11]

    On a supersymmetric completion of the R4 term in 2B supergravity,

    S. de Haro, A. Sinkovics, and K. Skenderis, “On a supersymmetric completion of the R4 term in 2B supergravity,” Phys. Rev. D67 (2003) 084010, hep-th/0210080

    2003 arXiv

  5. [12]

    R4, purified,

    G. Policastro and D. Tsimpis, “ R4, purified,” Class. Quant. Grav. 23 (2006) 4753–4780, hep-th/0603165

    2006 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Higher derivative terms including the Ramond-Ramond five-form,

    M. F. Paulos, “Higher derivative terms including the Ramond-Ramond five-form,” JHEP 10 (2008) 047, 0804.0763

    2008 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Higher-derivative couplings in string theory: dualities and the B-field,

    J. T. Liu and R. Minasian, “Higher-derivative couplings in string theory: dualities and the B-field,” Nucl. Phys. B874 (2013) 413–470, 1304.3137

    2013 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Localization of gauge theory on a four-sphere and supersymmetric Wilson loops,

    V. Pestun, “Localization of gauge theory on a four-sphere and supersymmetric Wilson loops,” Commun. Math. Phys. 313 (2012) 71–129, 0712.2824

    2012 arXiv

  9. [16]

    S matrices from AdS space-time,

    J. Polchinski, “S matrices from AdS space-time,” hep-th/9901076

    arXiv

  10. [17]

    Holography in the flat space limit,

    L. Susskind, “Holography in the flat space limit,” AIP Conf. Proc. 493 (1999), no. 1 98–112, hep-th/9901079

    1999 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Flat space scattering and bulk locality in the AdS / CFT correspondence,

    S. B. Giddings, “Flat space scattering and bulk locality in the AdS / CFT correspondence,” Phys. Rev. D61 (2000) 106008, hep-th/9907129

    2000 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Analyticity and the Holographic S-Matrix,

    A. L. Fitzpatrick and J. Kaplan, “Analyticity and the Holographic S-Matrix,” JHEP 10 (2012) 127, 1111.6972

    2012 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Writing CFT correlation functions as AdS scattering amplitudes,

    J. Penedones, “Writing CFT correlation functions as AdS scattering amplitudes,” JHEP 03 (2011) 025, 1011.1485

    2011 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Scattering States in AdS/CFT,

    A. L. Fitzpatrick and J. Kaplan, “Scattering States in AdS/CFT,” 1104.2597. 31

    arXiv

  15. [22]

    Four point function ofN = 4 stress-tensor multiplet at strong coupling,

    V. Gon¸ calves, “Four point function ofN = 4 stress-tensor multiplet at strong coupling,” JHEP 04 (2015) 150, 1411.1675

    2015 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Loops in AdS from Conformal Field Theory,

    O. Aharony, L. F. Alday, A. Bissi, and E. Perlmutter, “Loops in AdS from Conformal Field Theory,” JHEP 07 (2017) 036, 1612.03891

    2017 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Loop Corrections to Supergravity on AdS5×S5,

    L. F. Alday and A. Bissi, “Loop Corrections to Supergravity on AdS5×S5,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017), no. 17 171601, 1706.02388

    2017 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Unmixing Supergravity,

    F. Aprile, J. M. Drummond, P. Heslop, and H. Paul, “Unmixing Supergravity,” JHEP 02 (2018) 133, 1706.08456

    2018 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Loop corrections for Kaluza-Klein AdS amplitudes,

    F. Aprile, J. M. Drummond, P. Heslop, and H. Paul, “Loop corrections for Kaluza-Klein AdS amplitudes,” JHEP 05 (2018) 056, 1711.03903

    2018 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Genus-One String Amplitudes from Conformal Field Theory,

    L. F. Alday, A. Bissi, and E. Perlmutter, “Genus-One String Amplitudes from Conformal Field Theory,” 1809.10670

    arXiv

  21. [29]

    On Genus-one String Amplitudes on AdS5×S5,

    L. F. Alday, “On Genus-one String Amplitudes on AdS5×S5,” 1812.11783

    arXiv

  22. [30]

    String corrections to AdS amplitudes and the double-trace spectrum of N=4 SYM,

    J. M. Drummond, D. Nandan, H. Paul, and K. S. Rigatos, “String corrections to AdS amplitudes and the double-trace spectrum of N=4 SYM,” 1907.00992

    1907 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Gravitational S-matrix from CFT dispersion relations,

    L. F. Alday and S. Caron-Huot, “Gravitational S-matrix from CFT dispersion relations,” JHEP 12 (2018) 017, 1711.02031

    2018 arXiv

  24. [32]

    All Tree-Level Correlators in AdS 5×S5 Supergravity: Hidden Ten-Dimensional Conformal Symmetry,

    S. Caron-Huot and A.-K. Trinh, “All Tree-Level Correlators in AdS 5×S5 Supergravity: Hidden Ten-Dimensional Conformal Symmetry,” 1809.09173

    arXiv

  25. [33]

    20′ Five-Point Function fromAdS5×S5 Supergravity,

    V. Gon¸ calves, R. Pereira, and X. Zhou, “20′ Five-Point Function fromAdS5×S5 Supergravity,” 1906.05305

    1906 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Holographic Four-Point Functions in the (2 , 0) Theory,

    L. Rastelli and X. Zhou, “Holographic Four-Point Functions in the (2 , 0) Theory,” 1712.02788

    arXiv

  27. [35]

    AdS3×S3 Tree-Level Correlators: Hidden Six-Dimensional Conformal Symmetry,

    L. Rastelli, K. Roumpedakis, and X. Zhou, “ AdS3×S3 Tree-Level Correlators: Hidden Six-Dimensional Conformal Symmetry,” 1905.11983. 32

    1905 arXiv

  28. [36]

    On Superconformal Four-Point Mellin Amplitudes in Dimension d> 2,

    X. Zhou, “On Superconformal Four-Point Mellin Amplitudes in Dimension d> 2,” 1712.02800

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    On Mellin Amplitudes in SCFTs with Eight Supercharges,

    X. Zhou, “On Mellin Amplitudes in SCFTs with Eight Supercharges,” JHEP 07 (2018) 147, 1804.02397

    2018 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Lessons from crossing symmetry at large N,

    L. F. Alday, A. Bissi, and T. Lukowski, “Lessons from crossing symmetry at large N,” JHEP 06 (2015) 074, 1410.4717

    2015 arXiv

  31. [39]

    AdS 4/CFT3 for Unprotected Operators,

    S. M. Chester, “AdS 4/CFT3 for Unprotected Operators,” 1803.01379

    arXiv

  32. [40]

    The M-Theory S-Matrix From ABJM: Beyond 11D Supergravity,

    S. M. Chester, S. S. Pufu, and X. Yin, “The M-Theory S-Matrix From ABJM: Beyond 11D Supergravity,” 1804.00949

    arXiv

  33. [41]

    M-Theory Reconstruction from (2,0) CFT and the Chiral Algebra Conjecture,

    S. M. Chester and E. Perlmutter, “M-Theory Reconstruction from (2,0) CFT and the Chiral Algebra Conjecture,” 1805.00892

    arXiv

  34. [42]

    Absence of D4R4 in M-Theory From ABJM,

    D. J. Binder, S. M. Chester, and S. S. Pufu, “Absence of D4R4 in M-Theory From ABJM,” 1808.10554

    arXiv

  35. [43]

    AdS 4/CFT3 from Weak to Strong String Coupling,

    D. J. Binder, S. M. Chester, and S. S. Pufu, “AdS 4/CFT3 from Weak to Strong String Coupling,” 1906.07195

    1906 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Double-trace spectrum of N = 4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory at strong coupling,

    F. Aprile, J. Drummond, P. Heslop, and H. Paul, “Double-trace spectrum of N = 4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory at strong coupling,” Phys. Rev. D98 (2018), no. 12 126008, 1802.06889

    2018 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Holographic correlators in AdS 3,

    S. Giusto, R. Russo, and C. Wen, “Holographic correlators in AdS 3,” JHEP 03 (2019) 096, 1812.06479

    2019 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Holographic correlators in AdS 3 without Witten diagrams,

    S. Giusto, R. Russo, A. Tyukov, and C. Wen, “Holographic correlators in AdS 3 without Witten diagrams,” 1905.12314

    1905 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Holographic Reconstruction of AdS Exchanges from Crossing Symmetry,

    L. F. Alday, A. Bissi, and E. Perlmutter, “Holographic Reconstruction of AdS Exchanges from Crossing Symmetry,” JHEP 08 (2017) 147, 1705.02318

    2017 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Growing Extra Dimensions in AdS/CFT,

    L. F. Alday and E. Perlmutter, “Growing Extra Dimensions in AdS/CFT,” 1906.01477

    1906 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Holography from Conformal Field Theory,

    I. Heemskerk, J. Penedones, J. Polchinski, and J. Sully, “Holography from Conformal Field Theory,” JHEP 10 (2009) 079, 0907.0151. 33

    2009 arXiv

  42. [50]

    How to Succeed at Holographic Correlators Without Really Trying,

    L. Rastelli and X. Zhou, “How to Succeed at Holographic Correlators Without Really Trying,” 1710.05923

    arXiv

  43. [51]

    The Overall Coefficient of the Two-loop Superstring Amplitude Using Pure Spinors,

    H. Gomez and C. R. Mafra, “The Overall Coefficient of the Two-loop Superstring Amplitude Using Pure Spinors,” JHEP 05 (2010) 017, 1003.0678

    2010 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Two-loop superstrings and S-duality,

    E. D’Hoker, M. Gutperle, and D. H. Phong, “Two-loop superstrings and S-duality,” Nucl. Phys. B722 (2005) 81–118, hep-th/0503180

    2005 arXiv

  45. [53]

    The closed-string 3-loop amplitude and S-duality,

    H. Gomez and C. R. Mafra, “The closed-string 3-loop amplitude and S-duality,” JHEP 10 (2013) 217, 1308.6567

    2013 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Polchinski, String theory

    J. Polchinski, String theory. Vol. 2: Superstring theory and beyond . Cambridge University Press, 2007

    2007

  47. [55]

    Supersymmetrical string theories,

    M. B. Green and J. H. Schwarz, “Supersymmetrical string theories,” Physics Letters B 109 (1982), no. 6 444 – 448

    1982

  48. [56]

    Low energy expansion of the four-particle genus-one amplitude in type II superstring theory,

    M. B. Green, J. G. Russo, and P. Vanhove, “Low energy expansion of the four-particle genus-one amplitude in type II superstring theory,” JHEP 02 (2008) 020, 0801.0322

    2008 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Superconformal symmetry, correlation functions and the operator product expansion,

    F. Dolan and H. Osborn, “Superconformal symmetry, correlation functions and the operator product expansion,” Nucl.Phys. B629 (2002) 3–73, hep-th/0112251

    2002 arXiv

  50. [58]

    A Natural Language for AdS/CFT Correlators,

    A. L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan, J. Penedones, S. Raju, and B. C. van Rees, “A Natural Language for AdS/CFT Correlators,” JHEP 11 (2011) 095, 1107.1499

    2011 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Unitarity and the Holographic S-Matrix,

    A. L. Fitzpatrick and J. Kaplan, “Unitarity and the Holographic S-Matrix,” JHEP 10 (2012) 032, 1112.4845

    2012 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Massive N=2 Gauge Theories at Large N,

    J. G. Russo and K. Zarembo, “Massive N=2 Gauge Theories at Large N,” JHEP 11 (2013) 130, 1309.1004

    2013 arXiv

  53. [61]

    N = 6 superconformal Chern-Simons-matter theories, M2-branes and their gravity duals,

    O. Aharony, O. Bergman, D. L. Jafferis, and J. Maldacena, “ N = 6 superconformal Chern-Simons-matter theories, M2-branes and their gravity duals,” JHEP 10 (2008) 091, 0806.1218

    2008 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Exact Results for Wilson Loops in Superconformal Chern-Simons Theories with Matter,

    A. Kapustin, B. Willett, and I. Yaakov, “Exact Results for Wilson Loops in Superconformal Chern-Simons Theories with Matter,” JHEP 1003 (2010) 089, 0909.4559. 34

    2010 arXiv

  55. [63]

    ABJM theory as a Fermi gas,

    M. Marino and P. Putrov, “ABJM theory as a Fermi gas,” J. Stat. Mech. 1203 (2012) P03001, 1110.4066

    2012 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Instanton effects in ABJM theory with general R-charge assignments,

    T. Nosaka, “Instanton effects in ABJM theory with general R-charge assignments,” JHEP 03 (2016) 059, 1512.02862

    2016 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Topological expansion for the 1-Hermitian matrix model correlation functions,

    B. Eynard, “Topological expansion for the 1-Hermitian matrix model correlation functions,” JHEP 11 (2004) 031, hep-th/0407261

    2004 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Algebraic methods in random matrices and enumerative geometry,

    B. Eynard and N. Orantin, “Algebraic methods in random matrices and enumerative geometry,” 0811.3531

    arXiv

  59. [67]

    A method of integration over matrix variables,

    M. L. Mehta, “A method of integration over matrix variables,” Comm. Math. Phys. 79 (1981), no. 3 327–340

    1981

  60. [68]

    Analyticity in Spin in Conformal Theories,

    S. Caron-Huot, “Analyticity in Spin in Conformal Theories,” JHEP 09 (2017) 078, 1703.00278

    2017 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Four point functions of lowest weight CPOs in N=4 SYM(4) in supergravity approximation,

    G. Arutyunov and S. Frolov, “Four point functions of lowest weight CPOs in N=4 SYM(4) in supergravity approximation,” Phys. Rev. D62 (2000) 064016, hep-th/0002170

    2000 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Implications of conformal invariance in field theories for general dimensions,

    H. Osborn and A. Petkou, “Implications of conformal invariance in field theories for general dimensions,” Annals Phys. 231 (1994) 311–362, hep-th/9307010

    1994 arXiv

  63. [71]

    N=4 superconformal Ward identities for correlation functions,

    A. V. Belitsky, S. Hohenegger, G. P. Korchemsky, and E. Sokatchev, “N=4 superconformal Ward identities for correlation functions,” Nucl. Phys. B904 (2016) 176–215, 1409.2502

    2016 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Seiberg-Witten prepotential from instanton counting,

    N. A. Nekrasov, “Seiberg-Witten prepotential from instanton counting,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 7 (2003), no. 5 831–864, hep-th/0206161

    2003 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Seiberg-Witten theory and random partitions,

    N. Nekrasov and A. Okounkov, “Seiberg-Witten theory and random partitions,” Prog. Math. 244 (2006) 525–596, hep-th/0306238

    2006 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Issues in topological gauge theory,

    A. Losev, N. Nekrasov, and S. L. Shatashvili, “Issues in topological gauge theory,” Nucl. Phys. B534 (1998) 549–611, hep-th/9711108

    1998 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Integrating over Higgs branches,

    G. W. Moore, N. Nekrasov, and S. Shatashvili, “Integrating over Higgs branches,” Commun. Math. Phys. 209 (2000) 97–121, hep-th/9712241. 35

    2000 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Wilson loops in N=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory from random matrix theory,

    G. Akemann and P. H. Damgaard, “Wilson loops in N=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory from random matrix theory,” Phys. Lett. B513 (2001) 179, hep-th/0101225. [Erratum: Phys. Lett.B524,400(2002)]

    2001 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Phase Transition of Anti-Symmetric Wilson Loops in N = 4 SYM,

    K. Okuyama, “Phase Transition of Anti-Symmetric Wilson Loops in N = 4 SYM,” JHEP 12 (2017) 125, 1709.04166

    2017 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Connected correlator of 1/2 BPS Wilson loops in N = 4 SYM,

    K. Okuyama, “Connected correlator of 1/2 BPS Wilson loops in N = 4 SYM,” JHEP 10 (2018) 037, 1808.10161

    2018 arXiv

  71. [79]

    An Exact prediction of N=4 SUSYM theory for string theory,

    N. Drukker and D. J. Gross, “An Exact prediction of N=4 SUSYM theory for string theory,” J. Math. Phys. 42 (2001) 2896–2914, hep-th/0010274

    2001 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Exact results for Wilson loops in arbitrary representations,

    B. Fiol and G. Torrents, “Exact results for Wilson loops in arbitrary representations,” JHEP 01 (2014) 020, 1311.2058

    2014 arXiv

  73. [81]

    2-D Gravity and random matrices,

    P. Di Francesco, P. H. Ginsparg, and J. Zinn-Justin, “2-D Gravity and random matrices,” Phys. Rept. 254 (1995) 1–133, hep-th/9306153

    1995 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Multiloop correlators for two-dimensional quantum gravity,

    J. Ambjorn, J. Jurkiewicz, and Yu. M. Makeenko, “Multiloop correlators for two-dimensional quantum gravity,” Phys. Lett. B251 (1990) 517–524

    1990

  75. [83]

    Operator product expansion of the lowest weight CPOs inN = 4 SYM4 at strong coupling,

    G. Arutyunov, S. Frolov, and A. C. Petkou, “Operator product expansion of the lowest weight CPOs inN = 4 SYM4 at strong coupling,” Nucl. Phys. B586 (2000) 547–588, hep-th/0005182. [Erratum: Nucl. Phys.B609,539(2001)]

    2000 arXiv

  76. [84]

    The Operator product expansion of N=4 SYM and the 4 point functions of supergravity,

    E. D’Hoker, S. D. Mathur, A. Matusis, and L. Rastelli, “The Operator product expansion of N=4 SYM and the 4 point functions of supergravity,” Nucl. Phys. B589 (2000) 38–74, hep-th/9911222

    2000 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Correlation Functions of Coulomb Branch Operators,

    E. Gerchkovitz, J. Gomis, N. Ishtiaque, A. Karasik, Z. Komargodski, and S. S. Pufu, “Correlation Functions of Coulomb Branch Operators,” JHEP 01 (2017) 103, 1602.05971

    2017 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Large N Correlation Functions in Superconformal Field Theories,

    D. Rodriguez-Gomez and J. G. Russo, “Large N Correlation Functions in Superconformal Field Theories,” JHEP 06 (2016) 109, 1604.07416

    2016 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Seiberg-Witten Theories on Ellipsoids,

    N. Hama and K. Hosomichi, “Seiberg-Witten Theories on Ellipsoids,” JHEP 09 (2012) 033, 1206.6359. [Addendum: JHEP10,051(2012)]. 36

    2012 arXiv

  80. [88]

    One loop in eleven-dimensions,

    M. B. Green, M. Gutperle, and P. Vanhove, “One loop in eleven-dimensions,” Phys. Lett. B409 (1997) 177–184, hep-th/9706175. [,164(1997)]

    1997 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Supersymmetry constraints on type IIB supergravity,

    M. B. Green and S. Sethi, “Supersymmetry constraints on type IIB supergravity,” Phys. Rev. D59 (1999) 046006, hep-th/9808061

    1999 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Two loops in eleven-dimensions,

    M. B. Green, H.-h. Kwon, and P. Vanhove, “Two loops in eleven-dimensions,” Phys. Rev. D61 (2000) 104010, hep-th/9910055

    2000 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Duality and higher derivative terms in M theory,

    M. B. Green and P. Vanhove, “Duality and higher derivative terms in M theory,” JHEP 01 (2006) 093, hep-th/0510027

    2006 arXiv

  84. [92]

    The N = 4 Superconformal Bootstrap,

    C. Beem, L. Rastelli, and B. C. van Rees, “The N = 4 Superconformal Bootstrap,” Phys.Rev.Lett. 111 (2013), no. 7 071601, 1304.1803

    2013 arXiv

  85. [93]

    More N = 4 superconformal bootstrap,

    C. Beem, L. Rastelli, and B. C. van Rees, “More N = 4 superconformal bootstrap,” Phys. Rev. D96 (2017), no. 4 046014, 1612.02363. 37

    2017 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.