Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 57 references

Rotating Black Holes in Einstein-Born-Infeld Theory

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Rotating Born-Infeld black holes exceed the g=2 Kerr-Newman value

desk verdict First exact numerical rotating EBI family, but the extremal/naked-singularity dichotomy rests on temperature trends and numerical termination rather than direct evidence; still worth refereeing with requests for convergence and Smarr data. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.00879 v1 pith:WEFUDH5D submitted 2025-07-01 gr-qc

Lang Cheng , Peng Wang This is my paper
classification gr-qc
keywords Einstein-Born-InfeldtheoryrotatingblackholesgyromagneticratioinnermoststablecircularorbitnonlinearelectrodynamicsspectralmethodsKerr-Newmannakedsingularities
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper numerically constructs stationary, axisymmetric, asymptotically flat black holes that solve the full Einstein-Born-Infeld field equations with both electric charge and rotation. It aims to show that, for fixed spin and nonlinear coupling, such solutions form a finite family in charge that ends either at an extremal black hole or at a naked-singularity configuration, depending on how strongly nonlinear the electromagnetic action is. Using these solutions, it claims two concrete deviations from the Kerr-Newman family: the gyromagnetic ratio is always larger than 2, and both prograde and retrograde innermost stable circular orbits sit closer to the horizon. A sympathetic reader would care because Kerr-Newman is the standard charged rotating black hole, so any concrete deviation in $g$ and ISCO radius is a potentially testable imprint of nonlinear electrodynamics.

What carries the argument

The engine of the paper is a spectral-method solver for the metric ansatz $ds^2 = -e^{2F_0} N dt^2 + e^{2F_1}(dr^2/N + r^2 d\theta^2) + e^{2F_2} r^2 \sin^2\theta (d\phi - W\,dt/r^2)^2$ together with a gauge field written in terms of $A_t$ and $A_\phi$, with $N = 1 - r_H/r$. The six functions $F_0, F_1, F_2, W, A_t, A_\phi$ are expanded in Chebyshev polynomials in a compactified radial coordinate and cosines in $\theta$, and the nonlinear equations are solved by Newton-Raphson iteration subject to horizon, asymptotic, axis, and equatorial-symmetry boundary conditions. The same ansatz feeds the effective potential $V_{\rm eff}$ whose double zero locates the prograde and retrograde ISCOs, and asymptotic coefficients supply $M$, $J$, $Q$, and $\mu_M$ from which the gyromagnetic ratio is formed. The Smarr relation and the absence of conical singularities serve as internal accuracy checks.

What would settle it

Use a different numerical scheme, such as high-resolution finite differences or an alternative compactified ansatz, to continue the constant-$\tilde a$ sequences past the reported endpoints; if a solution with a regular horizon and finite horizon area exists beyond a claimed naked-singularity endpoint, or if a solution with $T_H \to 0$ exists where the paper reports rising temperature, the endpoint classification fails. Directly computing a curvature invariant such as the Kretschmann scalar at the claimed naked-singularity points would also settle the matter: a divergent invariant with vanishing horizon radius supports the classification, while a finite invariant refutes it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes a family of rotating, charged black hole solutions in Einstein-Born-Infeld theory by solving the coupled nonlinear field equations with spectral methods and Newton-Raphson iteration. For small values of the dimensionless nonlinear coupling $\tilde a$, solutions with fixed spin $\chi$ run to an extremal limit as the charge-to-mass ratio $q$ grows, with Hawking temperature falling toward zero; for large $\tilde a$, the solution lines terminate at configurations the paper identifies as naked singularities, signaled by rising temperature and by analogy with the static phase diagram. Rotation can shift the boundary, since at $\tilde a = 6$ the static family ends in naked singularities while the rotating family at $\chi = 0.5$ approaches extremality. The computed gyromagnetic ratio $g = 2 \mu_M M / (QJ)$ is always above the Kerr-Newman value $g=2$, rising with $q$ and $\tilde a$ and depending only weakly on spin. Both prograde and retrograde ISCO radii decrease with $q$ for all $\tilde a$ and are consistently smaller than the Kerr-Newman radii, with a non-monotonic dependence on $\tilde a$. The authors state that the numerical ansatz does not give accurate solutions in the immediate vicinity of the extremal limit, so the endpoint classification rests on temperature trends and the static analogue rather than on direct geometric evidence.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the endpoint where the Newton-Raphson solver can no longer find a solution is a real boundary of the solution space—an extremal black hole or a naked singularity—rather than a numerical breakdown of the chosen ansatz.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Rotating charged Einstein-Born-Infeld black holes exist only within a finite charge window for fixed spin and coupling, with the window bounded by either an extremal endpoint or a naked-singularity endpoint.
  • For fixed spin, smaller nonlinear coupling favors extremal endpoints while larger coupling favors naked-singularity endpoints, and the transition value depends on the spin $\chi$.
  • The gyromagnetic ratio $g > 2$ means a rotating charged black hole with Born-Infeld electrodynamics produces a larger magnetic dipole moment than Kerr-Newman at the same mass, charge, and spin.
  • Because both ISCO radii are smaller than in Kerr-Newman, accretion disks around such black holes can have their inner edge closer to the horizon, altering radiative efficiency and the emitted spectrum.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the endpoint classification is correct, the rotating family should have a three-dimensional existence diagram in $(q, \tilde a, \chi)$ with a rotation-dependent dividing surface between extremal and naked-singularity boundaries; mapping that surface precisely would require a near-extremal ansatz the paper leaves for future work.
  • Because $g$ rises with $\tilde a$ while depending only weakly on $\chi$, a measurement of the gyromagnetic ratio from the electromagnetic environment of a candidate black hole could constrain the Born-Infeld scale even when the spin is poorly known.
  • The smaller ISCO radii suggest that shadows and photon rings, which probe the same near-horizon geometry, will also deviate from Kerr-Newman; computing the effective photon geometry, which differs from the metric in nonlinear electrodynamics, is a concrete next step.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper claims to numerically construct a family of stationary, axisymmetric, asymptotically flat black hole solutions in Einstein-Born-Infeld theory, with both electric charge and rotation. The authors use a spectral method with Chebyshev and Fourier-type basis functions, compactifying the radial coordinate and solving the coupled PDEs by Newton-Raphson continuation in the charge parameter. Their central physical claims are: (i) for small Born-Infeld coupling, rotating BI black holes with fixed spin approach an extremal limit as charge increases; (ii) for large coupling, the solution branches terminate at configurations interpreted as naked singularities; (iii) the gyromagnetic ratio always exceeds the Kerr-Newman value g = 2 and increases with charge and coupling; and (iv) both prograde and retrograde ISCO radii are consistently smaller than in Kerr-Newman. The paper presents these as the first concrete rotating charged EBI black hole solutions with observable deviations from Kerr-Newman.

Significance. If the numerical solutions are correct, this is a meaningful step forward: it would provide the first direct construction of rotating charged Einstein-Born-Infeld black holes and a set of falsifiable predictions (g > 2 and reduced ISCO radii) that differ from Kerr-Newman. The method is standard and the target observables are not fitted parameters, which is a strength. However, the central claims rest on numerical continuation near the limits of the scheme, and the manuscript does not report the verification data needed to judge the accuracy of the solutions. The significance is real but conditional on that missing evidence.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. II.C and Eq. (13)] The Smarr relation (13) is introduced as the accuracy monitor, but no Smarr-residual values, PDE residual norms, or resolution-convergence data are reported anywhere in Sec. III. Concretely, the authors should report the maximum violation of Eq. (13) for representative solutions, the maximum residual of the field equations at the collocation points, and a comparison between resolutions (e.g., Nx = 40, Ntheta = 10 versus Nx = 60, Ntheta = 16). Without such numbers, the claim that these are solutions of the full nonlinear field equations is not substantiated.
  2. [Sec. III, after Fig. 2] The endpoints of the constant-a/rH^2 lines are defined by the failure of Newton-Raphson to converge within a prescribed tolerance, but the tolerance is never specified, and the interpretation of these endpoints as extremal black holes is weakened by the authors' own admission that the numerical ansatz does not yield sufficiently accurate solutions near the extremal limit. The monotonic decrease of the Hawking temperature toward the endpoints is suggestive but not sufficient; direct evidence such as vanishing surface gravity accompanied by finite nonzero horizon area, or an explicit near-horizon expansion, is needed to distinguish a physical extremal limit from a numerical breakdown of the scheme.
  3. [Sec. III, large-a-tilde naked-singularity claim] For large a-tilde, the claim that constant-a-tilde lines continue to intersect constant-a/rH^2 lines with increasingly large a/rH^2 is supported by Fig. 2 only up to a/rH^2 = 50, and the limiting configuration is never exhibited geometrically. The extrapolation to rH/M to 0 as a naked-singularity limit is therefore not verified, and the non-monotonic Hawking-temperature behavior in the chi = 0.5, a-tilde = 50 case shows that the temperature trend alone is not a reliable classifier. The authors should either compute solutions at larger a/rH^2 or provide curvature invariants or other geometric diagnostics approaching the alleged naked-singularity configuration.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. II.B, Eq. (13)] The Smarr relation (13) contains an integral over the energy-momentum tensor, but the explicit expression for this term in terms of the solved functions F0, F1, F2, W, At, Aphi is not given, which makes it difficult for a reader to verify the accuracy check independently.
  2. [Sec. III, Fig. 2] The insets in Fig. 2 are too small to read the endpoint values of a-tilde; the authors should provide a larger version or a table of endpoint values for each constant-a/rH^2 line.
  3. [Sec. III, first paragraph] There is a typo in the sentence 'electric charges induces a magnetic dipole moment'; it should read 'electric charge induces a magnetic dipole moment.'
  4. [Sec. II.C, Eq. (25)] The notation F^(k) for the spectral approximation is introduced, but the set F is defined as {F0, F1, F2, W, At, Aphi}; it would be clearer to also specify which index k corresponds to which function.
  5. [Sec. II.B] The sentence about light rings and shadows is not used in the rest of the paper, since photon orbits are explicitly left for future study; it could be shortened or moved to the outlook.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No material circularity: the gyromagnetic ratio and ISCO results are direct numerical outputs, with only minor non-load-bearing self-citations.

full rationale

The paper's central quantitative claims — g > 2 and smaller prograde/retrograde ISCO radii relative to Kerr-Newman — are obtained by numerically solving the Einstein-Born-Infeld field equations under the stated ansatz (Eq. 9) and boundary conditions (Eqs. 21–24), then reading off asymptotic charges (Eq. 12) and solving the geodesic effective-potential conditions (Eqs. 16–19). No parameter is fitted to reproduce g or the ISCO radii; the quantities are post-dictions of the computed spacetime, so they are not circular by construction. The citations to the authors' earlier work concern the static BI solution (Eqs. 6–7), the numerical ansatz and boundary-condition framework, and the Smarr-relation check (Eq. 13); none of these reduce the rotating-solution results to an assumed conclusion. The identification of solution endpoints as extremal black holes or naked singularities is an interpretive step based on termination of the Newton-Raphson continuation and on Hawking-temperature trends, and the paper explicitly admits the ansatz is not accurate near the extremal limit; however, this is a numerical-evidence and correctness concern, not a circularity, because the endpoint classification does not appear among the equations' inputs. Self-citations such as [18–20,23–26,42,51,54] are present but are not load-bearing in the derivation of g or ISCO. The analysis is therefore largely self-contained, and the absence of reported Smarr residuals or convergence data, while worth noting as a validation gap, does not constitute circular reasoning.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No data-fitting free parameters appear: the only inputs are theory constants and scanned parameters (rH, a, Q, chi). The main burden of the paper is the ansatz and the physical interpretation of numerical endpoints. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Stationary, axisymmetric, asymptotically flat EBI black holes are fully captured by the ansatz (9) with N = 1 - rH/r and six functions of (r, theta).
    The paper adopts this ansatz following Refs. [52-54] without proving it covers all solutions of the EBI field equations in this symmetry class. If a solution required additional degrees of freedom or a different coordinate form, the family constructed here would be restricted.
  • ad hoc to paper The endpoint of numerical continuation, where solutions can no longer be found within tolerance, corresponds to a physical boundary (extremal black hole or naked singularity) rather than numerical failure.
    The classification of small-tilde-a and large-tilde-a endpoints depends on this interpretation. The paper does not establish the physical nature of the endpoint with direct convergence or horizon data.
  • domain assumption The static EBI black hole phase diagram shown in Fig. 1 qualitatively extends to the rotating case.
    The rotating-case naked-singularity interpretation borrows directly from the static (q, tilde-a) diagram, specifically the large-tilde-a branch where temperature grows toward a naked singularity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Rotating Black Holes in Einstein-Born-Infeld Theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WEFUDH5D

@misc{pith2026250700879,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Rotating Black Holes in Einstein-Born-Infeld Theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WEFUDH5D}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.00879}
}
read the original abstract

We numerically construct a family of stationary, axisymmetric black hole solutions in Einstein-Born-Infeld theory, incorporating both electric charge and rotation. Our results indicate that when nonlinear electromagnetic effects are weak, rotating BI black holes with fixed spin approach the extremal limit as the electric charge increases. In contrast, strong nonlinear effects lead to the termination of solutions at configurations corresponding to naked singularities. We demonstrate that nonlinear electrodynamics enhances the gyromagnetic ratio relative to that of Kerr-Newman (KN) black holes. Additionally, we analyze the Innermost Stable Circular Orbits (ISCOs) and find that both prograde and retrograde ISCO radii are consistently smaller than those found in KN black holes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.00879 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Constant- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Hawking temperatures [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Gyromagnetic ratio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: displays the prograde ISCO radius r pro ISCO and retrograde ISCO radius r ret ISCO of rotating BI black holes as a function of q for various values of ˜a. The results are presented for χ = 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 in the left, middle, and right columns, respectively. For comp…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Newman, E

    E T. Newman, E. Couch, K. Chinnapared, A. Exton, A. Prakash, and R. Torrence. Metric of a Rotating, Charged Mass. J. Math. Phys., 6:918–919, 1965. doi:10.1063/1.1704351. I

    doi:10.1063/1.1704351 1965

  2. [2]

    Harald H. Soleng. Charged black points in general relativity coupled to the logarithmic U(1) gauge theory. Phys. Rev. D, 52:6178–6181, 1995. arXiv:hep-th/9509033, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.52.6178. I

    arXiv 1995

  3. [3]

    Regular black hole in general relativity coupled to nonlin- ear electrodynamics

    Eloy Ayon-Beato and Alberto Garcia. Regular black hole in general relativity coupled to nonlin- ear electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett., 80:5056–5059, 1998. arXiv:gr-qc/9911046, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.80.5056. I

    arXiv 1998

  4. [4]

    Born and L

    M. Born and L. Infeld. Foundations of the new field theory. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 144(852):425–451,

    work page

  5. [5]

    E. S. Fradkin and Arkady A. Tseytlin. Nonlinear Electrodynamics from Quantized Strings. Phys. Lett. B, 163:123–130, 1985. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)90205-9. I

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)90205-9 1985

  6. [6]

    Tseytlin

    Arkady A. Tseytlin. Vector Field Effective Action in the Open Superstring Theory. Nucl. Phys. B, 276:391, 1986. [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 291, 876 (1987)]. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90303-2

    doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90303-2 1987

  7. [7]

    I. H. Salazar, A. Garcia, and J. Plebanski. Duality Rotations and Type D Solutions to Einstein Equations With Nonlinear Electromagnetic Sources. J. Math. Phys., 28:2171–2181, 1987. doi:10. 1063/1.527430

    work page 1987

  8. [8]

    Wiltshire

    David L. Wiltshire. Black Holes in String Generated Gravity Models. Phys. Rev. D, 38:2445, 1988. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.38.2445. I

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.38.2445 1988

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    Demianski

    M. Demianski. STATIC ELECTROMAGNETIC GEON. Found. Phys., 16:187–190, 1986. doi:10. 1007/BF01889380. I

    1986

  2. [10]

    Charged black hole solutions in Einstein-Born-Infeld gravity with a cosmological constant

    Sharmanthie Fernando and Don Krug. Charged black hole solutions in Einstein-Born-Infeld gravity with a cosmological constant. Gen. Rel. Grav., 35:129–137, 2003. arXiv:hep-th/0306120, doi:10.1023/A: 1021315214180. I

    2003 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Tanay Kr. Dey. Born-Infeld black holes in the presence of a cosmological constant. Phys. Lett. B, 595(1-4):484–490, 2004. arXiv:hep-th/0406169, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.06.047. II A

    2004 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Born-Infeld black holes in (A)dS spaces

    Rong-Gen Cai, Da-Wei Pang, and Anzhong Wang. Born-Infeld black holes in (A)dS spaces. Phys. Rev. D, 70:124034, 2004. arXiv:hep-th/0410158, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.124034. I, II A

    2004 arXiv

  5. [13]

    D. A. Rasheed. Nonlinear electrodynamics: Zeroth and first laws of black hole mechanics. 2 1997. arXiv:hep-th/9702087. I, II B 15

    1997 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Smarr’s formula for black holes with non-linear electrodynamics

    Nora Breton. Smarr’s formula for black holes with non-linear electrodynamics. Gen. Rel. Grav., 37:643–650, 2005. arXiv:gr-qc/0405116, doi:10.1007/s10714-005-0051-x

    2005 arXiv

  7. [15]

    New type of phase transition in Reissner Nordstr ˜A¶m–AdS black hole and its thermodynamic geometry

    Rabin Banerjee, Sumit Ghosh, and Dibakar Roychowdhury. New type of phase transition in Reissner Nordstr ˜A¶m–AdS black hole and its thermodynamic geometry. Phys. Lett. B, 696:156–162, 2011. arXiv:1008.2644, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.12.010

    2011 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Critical behavior of Born-Infeld AdS black holes in the extended phase space thermodynamics

    De-Cheng Zou, Shao-Jun Zhang, and Bin Wang. Critical behavior of Born-Infeld AdS black holes in the extended phase space thermodynamics. Phys. Rev. D, 89(4):044002, Feb 2014. URL: https:// link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.044002, arXiv:1311.7299, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89. 044002

    2014 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Einstein-Born-Infeld-Massive Gravity: adS-Black Hole Solutions and their Thermodynamical properties

    Seyed Hossein Hendi, Behzad Eslam Panah, and Shahram Panahiyan. Einstein-Born-Infeld-Massive Gravity: adS-Black Hole Solutions and their Thermodynamical properties. JHEP, 11:157, 2015. arXiv: 1508.01311, doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2015)157

    2015 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Thermodynamics and Phase Transition of a Nonlinear Electrodynamics Black Hole in a Cavity

    Peng Wang, Houwen Wu, and Haitang Yang. Thermodynamics and Phase Transition of a Nonlinear Electrodynamics Black Hole in a Cavity. JHEP, 07:002, 2019. arXiv:1901.06216, doi:10.1007/ JHEP07(2019)002

    2019 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Phase structures and transitions of Born– Infeld black holes in a grand canonical ensemble

    Kangkai Liang, Peng Wang, Houwen Wu, and Mingtao Yang. Phase structures and transitions of Born– Infeld black holes in a grand canonical ensemble. Eur. Phys. J. C, 80(3):187, 2020. arXiv:1907.00799, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7750-z

    2020 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Thermodynamics and Phase Transitions of Nonlinear Electrodynamics Black Holes in an Extended Phase Space

    Peng Wang, Houwen Wu, and Haitang Yang. Thermodynamics and Phase Transitions of Nonlinear Electrodynamics Black Holes in an Extended Phase Space. JCAP, 04(04):052, 2019. arXiv:1808. 04506, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/04/052. I

    2019 doi

  13. [21]

    Quasinormal modes and absorption cross- sections of Born–Infeld–de Sitter black holes

    Nora Bret´ on, Tyler Clark, and Sharmanthie Fernando. Quasinormal modes and absorption cross- sections of Born–Infeld–de Sitter black holes. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 26(10):1750112, 2017. arXiv: 1703.10070, doi:10.1142/S0218271817501127. I

    2017 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Quasi-normal modes and stability of Ein- stein–Born–Infeld black holes in de Sitter space

    Chong Oh Lee, Jin Young Kim, and Mu-In Park. Quasi-normal modes and stability of Ein- stein–Born–Infeld black holes in de Sitter space. Eur. Phys. J. C, 80(8):763, 2020. arXiv:2004.12185, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8309-8 . I

    2020 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Effects of Born–Infeld elec- trodynamics on black hole shadows

    Aoyun He, Jun Tao, Peng Wang, Yadong Xue, and Lingkai Zhang. Effects of Born–Infeld elec- trodynamics on black hole shadows. Eur. Phys. J. C, 82(8):683, 2022. arXiv:2205.12779, doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10637-x . I, II B

    2022 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Gravitational lensing by Born-Infeld naked singularities

    Yiqian Chen, Peng Wang, Houwen Wu, and Haitang Yang. Gravitational lensing by Born-Infeld naked singularities. Phys. Rev. D, 109(8):084014, 2024. arXiv:2305.17411, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109. 084014. II A

    2024 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Observations of orbiting hot spots around naked singularities

    Yiqian Chen, Peng Wang, Houwen Wu, and Haitang Yang. Observations of orbiting hot spots around naked singularities. JCAP, 04:032, 2024. arXiv:2309.04157, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/04/032. I

    2024 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Testing holographic conjectures of complexity with Born– 16 Infeld black holes

    Jun Tao, Peng Wang, and Haitang Yang. Testing holographic conjectures of complexity with Born– 16 Infeld black holes. Eur. Phys. J. C, 77(12):817, 2017. arXiv:1703.06297, doi:10.1140/epjc/ s10052-017-5395-3 . I

    2017 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Strong cosmic censorship for a scalar field in a Born-Infeld–de Sitter black hole

    Qingyu Gan, Guangzhou Guo, Peng Wang, and Houwen Wu. Strong cosmic censorship for a scalar field in a Born-Infeld–de Sitter black hole. Phys. Rev. D, 100(12):124009, 2019. arXiv:1907.04466, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.124009

    2019 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Hair distributions in noncommutative Einstein-Born-Infeld black holes

    Yan Peng. Hair distributions in noncommutative Einstein-Born-Infeld black holes. Nucl. Phys. B, 941:1–10, 2019. arXiv:1808.07988, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2019.02.016

    2019 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Scalarized Einstein-Born-Infeld black holes

    Peng Wang, Houwen Wu, and Haitang Yang. Scalarized Einstein-Born-Infeld black holes. Phys. Rev. D, 103(10):104012, 2021. arXiv:2012.01066, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.104012

    2021 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Stability of magnetic black holes in gen- eral nonlinear electrodynamics

    Kimihiro Nomura, Daisuke Yoshida, and Jiro Soda. Stability of magnetic black holes in gen- eral nonlinear electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. D, 101(12):124026, 2020. arXiv:2004.07560, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.124026

    2020 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Born–Infeld black holes in 4D Ein- stein–Gauss–Bonnet gravity

    Ke Yang, Bao-Min Gu, Shao-Wen Wei, and Yu-Xiao Liu. Born–Infeld black holes in 4D Ein- stein–Gauss–Bonnet gravity. Eur. Phys. J. C, 80(7):662, 2020. arXiv:2004.14468, doi:10.1140/ epjc/s10052-020-8246-6

    2020 arXiv

  24. [32]

    F. T. Falciano, M. L. Pe˜ nafiel, and J. C. Fabris. Entropy bound in Einstein-Born-Infeld black holes. Phys. Rev. D, 103(8):084046, 2021. arXiv:2103.14109, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.084046

    2021 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Gulmina Zaman Babar, Farruh Atamurotov, Shafqat Ul Islam, and Sushant G. Ghosh. Particle ac- celeration around rotating Einstein-Born-Infeld black hole and plasma effect on gravitational lensing. Phys. Rev. D, 103(8):084057, 2021. arXiv:2104.00714, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.084057

    2021 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Dyonically charged black holes arising in generalized Born–Infeld theory of electromag- netism

    Yisong Yang. Dyonically charged black holes arising in generalized Born–Infeld theory of electromag- netism. Annals Phys., 443:168996, 2022. arXiv:2204.11313, doi:10.1016/j.aop.2022.168996

    2022 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Topology of Born–Infeld-AdS black hole phase transitions: Bulk and CFT sides

    Md Sabir Ali, Hasan El Moumni, Jamal Khalloufi, and Karima Masmar. Topology of Born–Infeld-AdS black hole phase transitions: Bulk and CFT sides. Annals Phys., 465:169679, 2024. arXiv:2306.11212, doi:10.1016/j.aop.2024.169679

    2024 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Effect of nonlinear electrodynamics on shadows of slowly rotating black holes

    Jiuyang Tang, Yunqi Liu, Wei-Liang Qian, and Ruihong Yue. Effect of nonlinear electrodynamics on shadows of slowly rotating black holes. Chin. Phys. C, 47(2):025105, 2023. doi:10.1088/1674-1137/ ac9fba

    2023 doi

  29. [37]

    Zhe-Hua Wu and H. Lu. Superradiant instability of charged extremal black holes in Einstein-Born-Infeld gravity. JHEP, 07:003, 2024. arXiv:2404.02977, doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2024)003

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Charged black holes from an interacting vacuum

    Rodrigo Maier and Manuella Corrˆ ea e Silva. Charged black holes from an interacting vacuum. Phys. Rev. D, 110(8):084079, 2024. arXiv:2405.10293, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.084079

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Shadow and quasinormal modes of novel charged rotating black hole in Born–Infeld theory: Constraints from EHT results

    Muhammad Zahid, Furkat Sarikulov, Chao Shen, Maksud Umaraliyev, and Javlon Rayimbaev. Shadow and quasinormal modes of novel charged rotating black hole in Born–Infeld theory: Constraints from EHT results. Phys. Dark Univ., 46:101616, 2024. doi:10.1016/j.dark.2024.101616

    2024

  32. [40]

    Dynamics of spontaneous scalarization of black holes with nonlinear electromagnetic fields in anti-de 17 Sitter spacetime

    Ke-Tai Wu, Zi-Jun Zhong, Yi Li, Chong-Ye Chen, Cheng-Yong Zhang, Chao Niu, and Peng Liu. Dynamics of spontaneous scalarization of black holes with nonlinear electromagnetic fields in anti-de 17 Sitter spacetime. 12 2024. arXiv:2412.02132

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Spontaneous Vectorization in the Einstein-Born-Infeld- Vector Model

    Guang-Zai Ye, Chong-Ye Chen, and Peng Liu. Spontaneous Vectorization in the Einstein-Born-Infeld- Vector Model. 4 2025. arXiv:2504.09821

    2025 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Schwarzschild Black Holes Immersed in Born-Infeld Magnetic Fields and Their Observational Signatures

    Yiqian Chen, Guangzhou Guo, Benrong Mu, and Peng Wang. Schwarzschild Black Holes Immersed in Born-Infeld Magnetic Fields and Their Observational Signatures. 6 2025. arXiv:2506.19581. I

    2025 arXiv

  35. [43]

    The Newman-Janis algorithm, rotating solutions and Einstein-Born- Infeld black holes

    Diego Julio Cirilo Lombardo. The Newman-Janis algorithm, rotating solutions and Einstein-Born- Infeld black holes. Class. Quant. Grav., 21:1407–1417, 2004. arXiv:gr-qc/0612063, doi:10.1088/ 0264-9381/21/6/009. I

    2004 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Rotating charged black holes in Einstein-Born-Infeld theories and their ADM mass

    Diego Julio Cirilo Lombardo. Rotating charged black holes in Einstein-Born-Infeld theories and their ADM mass. Gen. Rel. Grav., 37:847–856, 2005. arXiv:gr-qc/0603066, doi:10.1007/ s10714-005-0071-6 . I

    2005 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Global structure of the Kerr family of gravitational fields

    Brandon Carter. Global structure of the Kerr family of gravitational fields. Phys. Rev., 174:1559–1571,

  38. [46]

    Traschen

    David Garfinkle and Jennie H. Traschen. On the Gyromagnetic Ratio of a Black Hole. Phys. Rev. D, 42:419–423, 1990. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.42.419. I

    1990 doi

  39. [47]

    A. N. Aliev and Valeri P. Frolov. Five-dimensional rotating black hole in a uniform magnetic field: The Gyromagnetic ratio. Phys. Rev. D, 69:084022, 2004. arXiv:hep-th/0401095, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD. 69.084022

    2004 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Black rings with a small electric charge: Gyromagnetic ratios and algebraic alignment

    Marcello Ortaggio and Vojtech Pravda. Black rings with a small electric charge: Gyromagnetic ratios and algebraic alignment. JHEP, 12:054, 2006. arXiv:gr-qc/0609049, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/ 12/054

    2006 arXiv

  41. [49]

    A. N. Aliev. Gyromagnetic Ratio of Charged Kerr-Anti-de Sitter Black Holes. Class. Quant. Grav., 24:4669–4678, 2007. arXiv:hep-th/0611205, doi:10.1088/0264-9381/24/18/008. I

    2007 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Jorge F. M. Delgado, Carlos A. R. Herdeiro, Eugen Radu, and Helgi Runarsson. Kerr–Newman black holes with scalar hair. Phys. Lett. B, 761:234–241, 2016. arXiv:1608.00631, doi:10.1016/ j.physletb.2016.08.032. I, II B

    2016 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Black holes with multiple photon spheres

    Guangzhou Guo, Yuhang Lu, Peng Wang, Houwen Wu, and Haitang Yang. Black holes with multiple photon spheres. Phys. Rev. D, 107(12):124037, 2023. arXiv:2212.12901, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD. 107.124037. II A

    2023 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Construction and physical properties of Kerr black holes with scalar hair

    Carlos Herdeiro and Eugen Radu. Construction and physical properties of Kerr black holes with scalar hair. Class. Quant. Grav., 32(14):144001, 2015. arXiv:1501.04319, doi:10.1088/0264-9381/32/14/ 144001. II B, II B

    2015 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Carlos A. R. Herdeiro, Eugen Radu, Hector O. Silva, Thomas P. Sotiriou, and Nicol´ as Yunes. Spin- induced scalarized black holes. Phys. Rev. Lett., 126(1):011103, 2021. arXiv:2009.03904, doi:10. 1103/PhysRevLett.126.011103

    2021 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Scalarized Kerr-Newman black holes

    Guangzhou Guo, Peng Wang, Houwen Wu, and Haitang Yang. Scalarized Kerr-Newman black holes. JHEP, 10:076, 2023. arXiv:2307.12210, doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2023)076. II B 18

    2023 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Novello, V

    M. Novello, V. A. De Lorenci, J. M. Salim, and Renato Klippert. Geometrical aspects of light propagation in nonlinear electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. D, 61:045001, 2000. arXiv:gr-qc/9911085, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.61.045001. II B

    arXiv

  48. [1934]

    doi:10.1098/rspa.1934.0059. I

    1934

  49. [1968]

    doi:10.1103/PhysRev.174.1559. I

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.