REVIEW 1 cited by
Simulated Mental Imagery for Robotic Task Planning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Traditional AI-planning methods for task planning in robotics require a symbolically encoded domain description. While powerful in well-defined scenarios, as well as human-interpretable, setting this up requires substantial effort. Different from this, most everyday planning tasks are solved by humans intuitively, using mental imagery of the different planning steps. Here we suggest that the same approach can be used for robots, too, in cases which require only limited execution accuracy. In the current study, we propose a novel sub-symbolic method called Simulated Mental Imagery for Planning (SiMIP), which consists of perception, simulated action, success-checking and re-planning performed on 'imagined' images. We show that it is possible to implement mental imagery-based planning in an algorithmically sound way by combining regular convolutional neural networks and generative adversarial networks. With this method, the robot acquires the capability to use the initially existing scene to generate action plans without symbolic domain descriptions, while at the same time plans remain human-interpretable, different from deep reinforcement learning, which is an alternative sub-symbolic approach. We create a dataset from real scenes for a packing problem of having to correctly place different objects into different target slots. This way efficiency and success rate of this algorithm could be quantified.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Can Mental Imagery Improve the Thinking Capabilities of AI Systems?
A framework for machine thinking that adds a Mental Imagery Unit is described, but its demonstrations do not test whether imagery improves reasoning.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.