Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 51 references

A Quiet Host in an Active Planet-Forming Disk: Optical Spectroscopy of WISPIT 2

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The first optical spectrum of WISPIT 2, a young star with two directly imaged protoplanets, shows no detectable stellar accretion and sets a 95% upper limit on its accretion rate below every measured epoch of PDS 70.

desk verdict A careful, honest upper limit on accretion for WISPIT 2, but the single-star assumption is a real caveat that the authors only mention at the end. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.20649 v2 pith:WFLHEDJL submitted 2026-07-22 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.EP

C. Swastik , M. Bestha , L. S. Sonith , S. Facchini , T. Sivarani , R. K. Banyal , Z. Wahhaj , A. Choudhary
show 6 more authors
M. Gopinathan P. Saraf A. Mallick M. P. Navaneeth S. Biswas K. Khushbu
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.EP
keywords pre-main-sequencestarstransitiondisksprotoplanetsstellaraccretionH-alphaspectroscopyatmosphericparameterslithiumabundanceyoungobjects
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper gives the first optical spectrum of WISPIT 2, a young star whose disk contains two directly imaged protoplanets and is the closest known analogue to PDS 70. The central claim is that the star is not visibly accreting: H-alpha stays in net absorption, with residual filling so weak (1.5–2 sigma, about 1.1 dex below the chromospheric noise floor) that it is attributed to chromospheric activity. From that the authors set a 95% upper limit on the stellar accretion rate of 3.6 × 10⁻¹¹ solar masses per year, a factor of a few below PDS 70's central rate and below the lowest epoch of its monitoring. If correct, this makes both known double-protoplanet hosts quiet at the star while their embedded planets accrete, implying a host-to-planet accretion ratio below about 18 and suggesting that multiple giant planets can starve the central star. The paper also reports the host's atmospheric parameters and a lithium measurement supporting its youth.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing measurement is a differential H-alpha analysis. The observed H-alpha equivalent width is measured from three flux-calibrated exposures and compared with photospheric H-alpha profiles synthesised at the best-fit atmospheric parameters from two independent model-atmosphere grids. Monte Carlo propagation of the systematic floors (150 K in effective temperature, 0.18 dex in surface gravity, 0.16 dex in metallicity), the observed equivalent-width uncertainty, continuum flux, extinction, distance, and calibration scatter gives an excess equivalent width of 0.21–0.29 Å with 1.45–1.98 sigma significance. That excess is converted to accretion luminosity via a standard empirical calib

What would settle it

Take phase-resolved high-resolution (R > 30,000) spectra across the 4.8-day orbit, model out the companion, and measure the primary's H-alpha profile; a resolved emission core with equivalent width larger than about 0.3 Å, or an accretion luminosity above the chromospheric noise floor, would overturn the no-accretion conclusion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The discovery is a non-detection with a tight limit. In the first optical spectrum of WISPIT 2, H-alpha appears in net absorption with an observed equivalent width of 0.395 ± 0.011 Å, while synthetic photospheric profiles from two independent model-atmosphere grids predict 0.61–0.68 Å. The excess filling, 0.21–0.29 Å, is positive for both grids but only marginally significant (1.45–1.98 sigma) and lies about 1.1 dex below the chromospheric noise level expected at this temperature, so it is consistent with chromospheric activity. Interpreting it as accretion would give a rate of about 1.4 × 10⁻¹¹ solar masses per year; because the filling is marginal and chromospheric, the authors instead quo

Load-bearing premise

The accretion limit rests on treating WISPIT 2 as a single star; a 4.8-day spectroscopic binary reported by a contemporaneous study would dilute the continuum and bias the photospheric H-alpha template, and the paper itself flags this as a caveat.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If correct, the result gives a second data point beyond PDS 70 for suppressed stellar accretion in double-protoplanet systems, strengthening the idea that multiple giant planets can shut off or greatly reduce gas flow to the star.
  • The host-to-planet accretion ratio of at most about 18, compared with three to four orders of magnitude in ordinary T Tauri stars, implies the embedded protoplanets are intercepting most of the inflowing gas.
  • The 95% upper limit of 3.6 × 10⁻¹¹ solar masses per year, below PDS 70's lowest monitored value, provides a quantitative benchmark for models of gas transport through overlapping planet gaps.
  • As the paper states, larger spectroscopic samples of multi-protoplanet transition disks are needed to test whether this suppression is generic or specific to these two systems.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the contemporaneously reported 4.8-day spectroscopic binary is real, the single-star photospheric template used for H-alpha is likely biased; the accretion upper limit should be re-derived with the binary components separated before being treated as final.
  • A decisive test would be high-resolution, phase-resolved H-alpha spectroscopy across the binary orbit: if the primary's residual H-alpha filling persists after subtracting the companion, it is accretion; if it disappears, it was a dilution artefact.
  • The suppressed host rate predicts a specific gas-transport regime in the inner disk; millimetre interferometry of the inner gas reservoir, as the paper suggests, could reveal whether gas is retained, filtered, or depleted, connecting the stellar non-detection to disk physics.
  • The same observed-versus-synthetic H-alpha comparison, applied to a larger sample of transition-disk hosts at low resolution, could identify quiet hosts cheaply and test whether suppressed stellar accretion correlates with the number of embedded giant planets.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper presents the first optical spectrum of the young pre-main-sequence star WISPIT 2, obtained with HFOSC on the 2-m Himalayan Chandra Telescope. Using iSpec spectral synthesis on low-resolution (R~1200–2200) spectra, the authors derive T_eff = 4551 ± 150 K, log g = 4.32 ± 0.18, and a model-dependent global metallicity [M/H] = −0.17 ± 0.16, validating the pipeline against Gaia FGK Benchmark Stars and K-type PMS templates at HFOSC resolution. They detect Li I 6708 Å, supporting youth. The Hα line remains in net absorption with a residual filling of 1.5–2.0σ relative to two synthetic photospheric grids; this filling is ~1.1 dex below the chromospheric noise level, so the authors treat it as non-detection and place a 95% upper limit on the stellar accretion rate of Mdot < 3.6×10^-11 M_sun/yr. They conclude that both known double-protoplanet hosts, PDS 70 and WISPIT 2, show strongly suppressed or undetectable host accretion. The Conclusions note a contemporaneous X-shooter/FEROS study (Bürgy et al. 2026) that independently finds little to no stellar accretion and reports a 4.8-day spectroscopic binary.

Significance. If robust, this is a valuable second data point for the hypothesis that multiple giant protoplanets suppress stellar accretion, and the paper's care in handling a marginal Hα residual is exemplary: the model dependence between two atmosphere grids is made explicit, the residual is compared with chromospheric noise, and the result is presented as an upper limit rather than a detection. The Monte Carlo propagation of uncertainties and the resolution-matched validation against benchmark stars are strengths, and the paper is honest about the limitations of low-resolution metallicity and the approximate nature of the Li age constraint. However, the central quantitative claims depend on an assumption of a single-star photosphere. The paper itself cites the detection of a 4.8-day spectroscopic binary, yet does not quantify how a companion would dilute the continuum, bias the atmospheric parameters, or affect the Hα equivalent width used to derive the accretion upper limit. This must be addressed before the quantitative upper limit can be considered reliable; the qualitative conclusion is supported by the external Bürgy et al. study but not by the present analysis alone.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 5; Sections 3.2–3.3] The 4.8-day spectroscopic binary reported by Bürgy et al. (2026) is cited in the Conclusions but not quantitatively incorporated into the analysis. Sections 2 and 3.2–3.3 assume a single-star photosphere for the rest-frame definition, the atmospheric fit, and the synthetic Hα template. A companion contributes continuum flux and possibly line flux, diluting the observed EW_Hα,obs = +0.395 ± 0.011 Å relative to the photospheric EW prediction (0.608–0.682 Å) and thereby mimicking partial Hα filling. The derived T_eff, log g, and [M/H] would become light-weighted averages rather than properties of the primary. For a companion contributing even 20–30% of the continuum, the resulting dilution would directly change the measured excess and the inferred accretion upper limit. The authors need to estimate the companion's flux ratio (e.g., from the binary parameters in Bürgy et al.) and recompute t
  2. [Section 3.2 (veiling check)] The a posteriori veiling check r_6000 ≲ 0.01 is used to justify the veiling-free model, but it is derived from the single-star fit and does not account for the companion's continuum. In a binary, the companion flux is not 'veiling' in the sense of an accretion excess but would appear as an additional continuum component that the single-star fit cannot distinguish from veiling. Consequently, the check is circular when used to argue that binarity is unimportant. The authors should either compute the expected dilution from the reported binary constraints and compare it with their veiling bound, or explicitly state that the veiling check only validates the internal consistency of the single-star model, not the absence of a companion. This is a load-bearing limitation for the atmospheric parameters and the Hα excess.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.3 and Fig. 1] The Hα equivalent width is quoted inconsistently as '+0.395 ± 0.011 Å' in the text and '395 ± 11 mÅ' in the figure; please adopt a single notation. Also, the caption of Fig. 1 shows 'EWobs = 395 ± 11 mÅ' while the text reports the same value with a plus sign; clarify the sign convention explicitly in the caption.
  2. [Appendix B] The GBS validation shows a coherent +0.18 ± 0.03 dex gravity offset, which is used as a systematic floor rather than a correction. This choice is defensible but should be discussed more explicitly: if the offset were applied as a correction, log g would be ~4.14, still consistent with the PMS expectation but lower than the adopted value. Please state why a floor is preferred and whether the conclusion (PMS nature) would change if the correction were applied.
  3. [Section 3.1] The statement that the Ca II IRT cores are 'somewhat shallower than typical' is qualitative and not used further. Since these lines are mentioned as a potential diagnostic, it would be useful to note explicitly that no quantitative IRT analysis is performed because of the low resolution and possible chromospheric contamination, or to remove the remark to avoid raising expectations.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Minor circular veiling check; central H-alpha comparison and accretion limit are otherwise based on independent benchmarks and external calibrations; binarity is a correctness risk, not circularity.

  1. self definitional [Section 3.2, atmospheric parameters, veiling discussion]
    "Veiling is expected to be negligible for any plausible accretion rate consistent with the Hα non-detection (Sect. 3.3), so we adopt a veiling-free model; an a posteriori check using the upper limit from Sect. 3.4 gives r6000 ≲0.01, confirming the assumption."

    The veiling-free model is justified by the Hα non-detection, which is derived only after adopting that same veiling-free model. The upper limit computed from this model is then used to confirm the veiling-free assumption. This is a self-consistency loop rather than an independent test. It is not load-bearing for the main Hα excess or the accretion upper limit, which would remain qualitatively unchanged if this check were omitted, but it is a genuine circular step in the reasoning.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is not circular. The atmospheric parameters are fitted over 6200–8000 Å with Hα, chromospheric, accretion-sensitive, and telluric regions masked, and the Hα photospheric EW is then synthesized at the posterior-median parameters (Sects. 3.2–3.3). Because the target line is excluded from the fit, the residual filling is a genuine model prediction rather than a re-fit of the data. The pipeline is validated against external Gaia FGK Benchmark Stars and Manara et al. PMS templates, and the accretion limit uses the external Alcalá et al. (2017) L_acc–L_Hα calibration and Manara et al. (2013) chromospheric noise. The main result therefore does not reduce to its inputs. The only circular step found is the a posteriori veiling check in Sect. 3.2, which is a minor self-consistency loop rather than a load-bearing derivation. Separately, the conclusions cite a contemporaneous study (Bürgy et al. 2026) reporting a 4.8-day spectroscopic binary; if real, this threatens the single-star model used throughout, but it is a modeling assumption/limitation, not a circular derivation. Self-citation to Swastik et al. (2021) provides methodology only and is not load-bearing.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central accretion limit rests on fitted atmospheric parameters (mainly Teff), external model-atmosphere grids, published calibrations, and the single-star assumption. No free parameter is hidden, but the binary issue is the largest unmodeled burden, and the metallicity and gravity are explicitly model-dependent at HFOSC resolution.

free parameters (3)
  • Teff = 4551 ± 150 K
    Fitted by MCMC with an informative prior (sigma=400 K) from van Capelleveen et al. (2025); used to compute the photospheric H-alpha EW and hence the accretion upper limit.
  • log g = 4.32 ± 0.18
    Fitted with an informative prior (sigma=0.3 dex) from the same source; a coherent +0.18 dex benchmark offset is used as a floor, not a correction.
  • [M/H] = -0.17 ± 0.16
    Fitted without a prior; treated as a low-resolution, model-dependent global metallicity rather than a precise abundance.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Castelli/ATLAS9 and MARCS model atmospheres, with iSpec/SPECTRUM synthesis, reliably represent the photosphere of a K-type pre-main-sequence star at R~2200.
    Used throughout Section 3.2 for Teff/logg/[M/H] and for the synthetic H-alpha EW; benchmark validation in Appendix B mitigates but does not remove this reliance.
  • domain assumption WISPIT 2's optical spectrum is that of a single star.
    The atmospheric fit and H-alpha photospheric template use single-star models. The paper notes in the Conclusions that Burgy et al. (2026) reports a 4.8-day spectroscopic binary, but this is not incorporated into the analysis.
  • domain assumption The Manara et al. (2013) chromospheric-noise relation applies at Teff ~ 4550 K.
    Used in Sections 3.3-3.4 to argue that the residual H-alpha filling is consistent with chromospheric emission rather than accretion.
  • domain assumption The Alcala et al. (2017) L_acc-L_H_alpha calibration and its 0.13 dex scatter apply to this star.
    Used in Appendix D to convert the H-alpha excess into an accretion luminosity and upper limit.
  • domain assumption The absolute flux scale set by ASAS-SN g-band photometry is accurate to about 5%.
    Used to place the H-alpha continuum flux on an absolute scale in Section 3.3 and Appendix C.
  • domain assumption Veiling by accretion or disk emission is negligible (r_6000 < 0.01).
    Assumed in Section 3.2 and checked a posteriori from the accretion upper limit.
invented entities (1)
  • none
    purpose: No new particles, forces, or physical entities are introduced.
    This is a purely observational analysis of a known star and known protoplanets.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Quiet Host in an Active Planet-Forming Disk: Optical Spectroscopy of WISPIT 2." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WFLHEDJL

@misc{pith2026260720649,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Quiet Host in an Active Planet-Forming Disk: Optical Spectroscopy of WISPIT 2},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WFLHEDJL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.20649}
}
read the original abstract

WISPIT 2 is a young pre-main-sequence star hosting a multi-ringed transition disk and two directly imaged protoplanets, including the accreting WISPIT 2b, making it the closest known analogue to PDS 70. We present the first optical spectrum of its central star, obtained with HFOSC on the 2-m Himalayan Chandra Telescope, and derive its atmospheric parameters, test its youth, and constrain its accretion state. We analyse low-resolution spectra with iSpec and validate the pipeline at HFOSC resolution against Gaia FGK Benchmark Stars and K-type pre-main-sequence templates. We measure T_eff = 4551 +/- 150 K, log g = 4.32 +/- 0.18, and a low-resolution, model-dependent global metallicity [M/H] = -0.17 +/- 0.16. The surface gravity and Li I equivalent width support the pre-main-sequence nature of the host. H-alpha remains in net absorption but is partially filled by weak emission at only 1.5-2.0 sigma, approximately 1.1 dex below the expected chromospheric-noise level and therefore consistent with chromospheric activity rather than detectable accretion. We place a 95% upper limit on the stellar accretion rate of 3.6 x 10^-11 solar masses per year, below even the lowest monitored value for PDS 70 and implying a host-to-planet accretion-rate ratio below approximately 18. Both known double-protoplanet hosts therefore show strongly suppressed or undetectable stellar accretion. Larger spectroscopic samples are needed to determine whether this is common in multi-protoplanet transition disks.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.20649 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Top: normalised Hα region of WISPIT 2 (black; mean of three Grism 8 exposures, ±1σ in grey), with iSpec photospheric syntheses from the Castelli/ATLAS9 (red) and MARCS GES (blue) grids at the posterior-median parameters; coloured bands give the ±1σ Monte Carlo envelope. The shaded vertical band marks the 6555–6570 Å EW inte￾gration window. Bottom: residuals Fobs−Fphot for each grid, showing the residual Hα filling r… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , keywords =

    Migration of massive planets in accreting disks. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424837 , archivePrefix =. 1411.3190 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  2. [2]

    A&A , year = 2017, volume =

    An extensive VLT/X-shooter library of photospheric templates of pre-main sequence stars. A&A , year = 2017, volume =

    2017

  3. [3]

    , keywords =

    Properties and Occurrence Rates for Kepler Exoplanet Candidates as a Function of Host Star Metallicity from the DR25 Catalog. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aae391 , archivePrefix =. 1809.08385 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  4. [4]

    ApJL , year = 2025, volume =

    WIde Separation Planets In Time (WISPIT): A Gap-clearing Planet in a Multi-ringed Disk around the Young Solar-type Star WISPIT 2. ApJL , year = 2025, volume =

    2025

  5. [5]

    ApJL , year = 2025, volume =

    Wide Separation Planets In Time (WISPIT): Discovery of a Gap H Protoplanet WISPIT 2b with MagAO-X. ApJL , year = 2025, volume =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adf7a5 , eprint =

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adf7a5 2025

  6. [6]

    ApJL , year = 2026, volume =

    Direct spectroscopic confirmation of the young embedded proto-planet WISPIT 2c. ApJL , year = 2026, volume =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae4b3b , eprint =

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae4b3b 2026

  7. [7]

    ApJL , year = 2026, volume =

    A 2 au resolution view by ALMA of the planet-hosting WISPIT 2 disk. ApJL , year = 2026, volume =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae3c0a , eprint =

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae3c0a 2026

  8. [8]

    AJ , year = 2021, volume =

    Host Star Metallicity of Directly Imaged Wide-orbit Planets: Implications for Planet Formation. AJ , year = 2021, volume =

    2021

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    A&A , year = 2014, volume =

    Determining stellar atmospheric parameters and chemical abundances of FGK stars with iSpec. A&A , year = 2014, volume =

    2014

  2. [10]

    SF2A-2014: Proceedings of the Annual meeting of the French Society of Astronomy and Astrophysics , year = 2014, pages =

    The Gaia FGK benchmark stars and their reference parameters. SF2A-2014: Proceedings of the Annual meeting of the French Society of Astronomy and Astrophysics , year = 2014, pages =

    2014

  3. [11]

    A grid of MARCS model atmospheres for late-type stars. I. Methods and general properties. A&A , year = 2008, volume =

    2008

  4. [12]

    1: The effective temperature calibration of dwarf stars

    The calibration of MK spectral classes using spectral synthesis. 1: The effective temperature calibration of dwarf stars. AJ , year = 1994, volume =

    1994

  5. [13]

    A&A , year = 2021, volume =

    Atomic data for the Gaia-ESO Survey. A&A , year = 2021, volume =

    2021

  6. [14]

    A&A , year = 2017, volume =

    The Gaia-ESO Survey: stellar parameters and abundances of the young open clusters Chamaeleon I and Gamma Velorum. A&A , year = 2017, volume =

    2017

  7. [15]

    A&A , year = 2015, volume =

    Gaia FGK benchmark stars: Effective temperatures and surface gravities. A&A , year = 2015, volume =

    2015

  8. [16]

    A&A , year = 2014, volume =

    Gaia FGK benchmark stars: Metallicity. A&A , year = 2014, volume =

    2014

  9. [17]

    A&A , year = 2024, volume =

    Gaia FGK Benchmark Stars: Fundamental Teff and log g of the third version. A&A , year = 2024, volume =

    2024

  10. [18]

    ApJ , year = 1989, volume =

    The relationship between infrared, optical, and ultraviolet extinction. ApJ , year = 1989, volume =

    1989

  11. [19]

    ApJ , year = 1998, volume =

    Disk Accretion Rates for T Tauri Stars. ApJ , year = 1998, volume =

    1998

  12. [20]

    A&A , year = 2018, volume =

    Discovery of a planetary-mass companion within the gap of the transition disk around PDS 70. A&A , year = 2018, volume =

    2018

  13. [21]

    Nature Astronomy , year = 2019, volume =

    Two accreting protoplanets around the young star PDS 70. Nature Astronomy , year = 2019, volume =

    2019

  14. [22]

    ApJ , year = 2020, volume =

    Variable Accretion onto Protoplanet Host Star PDS 70. ApJ , year = 2020, volume =

    2020

  15. [23]

    ApJ , year = 2023, volume =

    The variable accretion and outflow activity of PDS 70. ApJ , year = 2023, volume =

    2023

  16. [24]

    Accretion properties of class II and transitional objects

    X-shooter spectroscopy of young stellar objects in Lupus. Accretion properties of class II and transitional objects. A&A , year = 2017, volume =

    2017

  17. [25]

    X-Shooter spectroscopy of young stellar objects. II. Impact of chromospheric emission on accretion rate estimates. A&A , year = 2013, volume =

    2013

  18. [26]

    A&A , year = 2019, volume =

    Constraining disk evolution prescriptions of planet population synthesis models with observed disk masses and accretion rates. A&A , year = 2019, volume =

    2019

  19. [27]

    ApJ , year = 2003, volume =

    Very Low Mass Stars and Brown Dwarfs in Taurus-Auriga. ApJ , year = 2003, volume =

    2003

  20. [28]

    Protostars and Planets VII , editor =

    Demographics of Young Stars and their Protoplanetary Disks: Lessons Learned on Disk Evolution and its Connection to Planet Formation. Protostars and Planets VII , editor =

  21. [29]

    ApJS , year = 2013, volume =

    Intrinsic Colors, Temperatures, and Bolometric Corrections of Pre-main-sequence Stars. ApJS , year = 2013, volume =

    2013

  22. [30]

    ApJ , year = 2008, volume =

    Lithium Depletion of Nearby Young Stellar Associations. ApJ , year = 2008, volume =

    2008

  23. [31]

    , year = 1989, volume =

    Optical Excess Emission in T Tauri Stars. , year = 1989, volume =

    1989

  24. [32]

    , year = 2010, volume =

    The Ages of Stars. , year = 2010, volume =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081309-130806 , adsurl =

    2010 doi

  25. [33]

    Search for associations containing young stars (SACY). III. Ages and Li abundances. , year = 2009, volume =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200911747 , adsurl =

    2009 doi

  26. [34]

    , year = 2020, volume =

    Analysis of Membership Probability in Nearby Young Moving Groups with Gaia DR2. , year = 2020, volume =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab76d6 , adsurl =

    2020 doi

  27. [35]

    , year = 2018, volume =

    The lithium-rotation connection in the 125 Myr-old Pleiades cluster. , year = 2018, volume =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731881 , adsurl =

    2018 doi

  28. [36]

    ApJ , year = 2006, volume =

    Gas Flow across Gaps in Protoplanetary Disks. ApJ , year = 2006, volume =

    2006

  29. [37]

    ApJL , year = 2019, volume =

    An Ideal Testbed for Planet-Disk Interaction: Two Giant Protoplanets in Resonance Shaping the PDS 70 Protoplanetary Disk. ApJL , year = 2019, volume =

    2019

  30. [38]

    Modelling of Stellar Atmospheres , year = 2003, editor =

    New Grids of ATLAS9 Model Atmospheres. Modelling of Stellar Atmospheres , year = 2003, editor =

    2003

  31. [39]

    The Evolution of the Lithium Abundances of Solar-Type Stars. III. The Pleiades. AJ , year = 1993, volume =

    1993

  32. [40]

    A&A , year = 2005, volume =

    Time scales of Li evolution: a homogeneous analysis of open clusters from ZAMS to late main-sequence evolution. A&A , year = 2005, volume =

    2005

  33. [41]

    ApJ , year = 2017, volume =

    Older and Colder: The Impact of Starspots on Pre-Main-Sequence Stellar Evolution. ApJ , year = 2017, volume =

    2017

  34. [42]

    ApJS , year = 1996, volume =

    Optical identifications of ROSAT All-Sky Survey X-ray sources. ApJS , year = 1996, volume =

    1996

  35. [43]

    A&A , year = 1997, volume =

    The NaI D resonance lines in main sequence late-type stars. A&A , year = 1997, volume =

    1997

  36. [44]

    A&A , year = 1997, volume =

    Lithium and the age of late-type members of young clusters. A&A , year = 1997, volume =

    1997

  37. [45]

    PASP , year = 2017, volume =

    The All-Sky Automated Survey for Supernovae (ASAS-SN) Light Curve Server v1.0. PASP , year = 2017, volume =. doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aa80d9 , adsurl =

    2017 doi

  38. [46]

    A study of the Chamaeleon star-forming region from the ROSAT all-sky survey. I. X-ray observations and optical identifications. A&AS , year = 1995, volume =

    1995

  39. [47]

    A&AS , year = 1997, volume =

    New 'weak-line' T Tauri stars in Lupus. A&AS , year = 1997, volume =

    1997

  40. [48]

    ApJ , year = 2014, volume =

    The Man behind the Curtain: X-Rays Drive the UV through NIR Variability in the 2013 Active Galactic Nucleus Outburst in NGC 2617. ApJ , year = 2014, volume =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/48 , adsurl =

    2013 doi

  41. [49]

    , year = 2011, month = sep, volume =

    Transitional and Pre-transitional Disks: Gap Opening by Multiple Planets?. , year = 2011, month = sep, volume =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/738/2/131 , eprint =

    2011 doi

  42. [50]

    , year = 2023, month = jan, volume =

    Simultaneous gas accretion onto a pair of giant planets: Impact on their final mass and on the protoplanetary disk structure. , year = 2023, month = jan, volume =

    2023

  43. [51]

    Evidence for a spectroscopic binary

    A closer look at the WISPIT 2 host star. Evidence for a spectroscopic binary. arXiv e-prints , year = 2026, month = jul, eid =. 2607.22405 , archivePrefix =

    2026 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.