Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 46 references

A C-Band Cryogenic GaAs MMIC Low-Noise Amplifier for Quantum Applications

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper reports a compact GaAs MMIC cryogenic low-noise amplifier that reaches a 5 K equivalent noise temperature in C-band and delivers 98.3% single-shot dispersive readout fidelity for superconducting qubits without a quantum-limited…

desk verdict A solid GaAs cryo-LNA engineering demo with a real qubit benchmark, but the headline 5 K noise figure needs error bars and a better-calibrated thermal model before the claim is trustworthy. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.19477 v1 pith:WFVYCRIO submitted 2024-12-27 quant-ph

Zechen Guo , Daxiong Sun , Peisheng Huang , Xuandong Sun , Yuefeng Yuan , Jiawei Zhang , Wenhui Huang , Yongqi Liang
show 11 more authors
Jiawei Qiu Jiajian Zhang Ji Chu Weijie Guo Ji Jiang Jingjing Niu Wenhui Ren Ziyu Tao Xiayu Linpeng Youpeng Zhong Dapeng Yu
This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords cryogeniclow-noiseamplifierGaAspHEMTMMICsuperconductingqubitreadoutdispersiveC-bandcurrentmultiplexingnoisetemperature
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper is trying to establish that a GaAs pHEMT MMIC cryogenic low-noise amplifier can serve as the first-stage amplifier for superconducting qubit readout, matching the noise, gain, and power budgets usually met by InP HEMT or SiGe devices. It reports a three-stage C-band amplifier, operating at 3.6 K with 15 mW power, that achieves an average gain of 38 dB and a minimum equivalent noise temperature of 5 K between 4 and 8 GHz. The significance is practical: GaAs MMICs are cheaper and more manufacturable at scale, so a competitive GaAs cryo-LNA would ease the wiring and cooling burden of large-scale quantum processors. The paper validates the design by demonstrating an average single-shot readout fidelity of 98.3% on a superconducting qubit without a parametric amplifier. A sympathetic reader would take the central claim as an engineering demonstration that GaAs can be a viable, scalable cryogenic amplifier platform for quantum readout.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing design object is a three-stage cascaded GaAs pHEMT amplifier in which the drain current of the second and third stages is reused through the pre-stage source inductor, so the whole chip runs from one drain bias line with a self-bias network. The first-stage matching network is optimized for minimum noise rather than maximum gain, the second stage supplies gain, and the third stage shapes gain flatness and output match; an RLC series network from drain to gate in the later stages provides negative feedback for flat gain and cryogenic stability. This combination carries the argument because it simultaneously meets the three constraints that matter for qubit readout: sub-6 K noise temperature, greater than 30 dB gain, and roughly 10 mW-class power consumption with a single bias line.

What would settle it

Measure the same amplifier with a temperature-variable matched noise source at the input, or with a second cryostat wiring profile where the cable temperature is logged at several points; if the de-embedded noise temperature moves by more than a few kelvin when the assumed 40 K midpoint is replaced by a measured profile, the 5 K figure is calibration-limited rather than device-limited.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a 150 nm GaAs pHEMT three-stage MMIC, using a current-multiplexing bias structure and RLC negative feedback, can deliver cryogenic noise and gain performance competitive with InP and SiGe alternatives while running from a single bias line. At an ambient temperature of 3.6 K, the amplifier shows gain above 32 dB across 2-10 GHz, noise temperature below 10 K across the full band, and below 6 K in the 5-7 GHz range, with a minimum of 5 K and an average gain of 38 dB in the 4-8 GHz band. Benchmarked on a superconducting qubit, the readout chain achieves ground-state fidelity of 99.1% and excited-state fidelity of 97.6%, an average of 98.3%, without a Josephson parametric amplifier. The paper also shows the readout fidelity remains above 95% when the amplifier is biased at only 6 mW, indicating that the design can trade power against performance. The authors conclude that this combination of low noise, high gain, low power, single-bias-line operation, and compact size makes GaAs MMIC cryo-LNAs suitable for large-scale quantum applications.

Load-bearing premise

The reported 5 K noise temperature rests on the cold-attenuator calibration assumption that the 20 dB input attenuator is fully thermalized at 3.6 K and that the connecting cable can be represented by a single midpoint temperature of about 40 K; if the real temperature profile differs, the de-embedded noise temperature shifts by an unquantified amount.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A GaAs MMIC cryo-LNA can serve as the first cryogenic stage in a superconducting qubit readout chain without a parametric amplifier, with average single-shot readout fidelity of 98.3%.
  • The single-bias-line, 15 mW design fits roughly 100 readout channels within a 1 W budget at the 4 K stage, a scale consistent with thousand-qubit processors.
  • Because readout fidelity stays above 95% at 6 mW, the amplifier can be biased down to lower power when system noise requirements are relaxed.
  • The 1.85 mm by 1.2 mm chip and 18 mm by 18 mm by 9 mm package make the amplifier compact enough for dense multichannel cryostat wiring.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The lack of quoted error bars on the 5 K noise temperature means a second calibration method, such as a temperature-variable matched noise source, would quantify how much of the quoted noise floor is device versus calibration.
  • Because the current-multiplexing structure is independent of the matching network, the same design could be ported to other frequency bands by rescaling the matching and feedback elements.
  • A natural scalability test not reported here is to operate several of these amplifiers in parallel on a multi-channel readout system and check whether the single-bias-line scheme keeps channel-to-channel isolation and fidelity intact.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a C-band GaAs pHEMT MMIC cryogenic LNA with a three-stage architecture, negative feedback loops, self-bias, and current multiplexing. At an ambient temperature of 3.6 K and 15 mW DC power, the authors claim an average gain of 38–40 dB and a minimum equivalent noise temperature of 5 K, measured with the cold-attenuator method. The LNA is then benchmarked in a superconducting qubit readout chain without a Josephson parametric amplifier, reporting an average single-shot dispersive readout fidelity of 98.3% and an SNR of about 4 at the highest bias.

Significance. If the reported noise and readout results are robust, this work demonstrates a cost-effective GaAs alternative to InP and SiGe cryogenic LNAs for large-scale superconducting qubit readout. The main strengths are the direct cryogenic S-parameter and cold-attenuator noise measurements, the integrated qubit benchmark without a JPA, and the low-power design. The paper is measurement-driven with no fitted parameters, and the central performance claims are falsifiable from the reported figures. The significance is tempered, however, by the lack of uncertainty analysis on the noise-temperature calibration and by inconsistencies between the abstract, figures, and conclusion regarding the headline values.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract, Section VI, Fig. 4(c)] The headline "5 K equivalent noise temperature" is not supported by the data as displayed: Fig. 4(c) shows the noise temperature dropping "below 6 K" in the 5–7 GHz range, and no point is identified at 5 K. The conclusion repeats the 5 K value. Please either revise the claim to "below 6 K" or report the exact measured minimum with frequency and bias condition.
  2. [Section IV, Fig. 4(a)] The cold-attenuator de-embedding relies on two unmeasured thermal assumptions: the 20 dB input attenuator is fully thermalized at 3.6 K, and the 296 K-to-3.6 K input cable can be represented by a single midpoint temperature of 40 K. Since the attenuator enters the de-embedded T_e as (1-1/L)T_att plus the cable contribution divided by L, any deviation from full thermalization shifts the reported noise temperature almost linearly. A single midpoint value cannot capture the distributed integral of loss-weighted temperature along the cable, and an asymmetric profile could bias the result by an unknown sign and magnitude. No error bars, repeated measurements, or sensitivity analysis are provided for T_e, gain, or the derived readout fidelity. This calibration is load-bearing for the central noise claim, so the authors should provide an uncertainty budget or at least a sensitivity scan.
  3. [Section V, Fig. 5(b), abstract] The abstract states the LNA operates at 15 mW, and the conclusion reports an average single-shot readout fidelity of 98.3%. However Fig. 5(b) states that the readout fidelity "stabilize[s] above F0=0.99 and F1=0.975 when the power exceeds 16 mW", with maximum power of 31 mW. The operating point used for the 98.3% average is not specified, and 15 mW falls below the stated stabilization threshold. The authors should state the exact bias and DC power for the quoted fidelity and reconcile the 15 mW operating claim with Fig. 5(b).
  4. [Section V, Fig. 5(a)] The readout-fidelity result is under-specified: no integration time, readout pulse amplitude/frequency, number of single-shot repetitions, assignment procedure, or SPAM correction is given, and no error bars are provided for F0 and F1. Without these details, the 98.3% claim cannot be compared with prior readout benchmarks and could be affected by the same unquantified chain calibration. Please add a measurement-parameters table and uncertainty estimates.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sections IV and V] There are several typos: "citical" should be "critical", "varing" should be "varying", and "deigned" should be "designed".
  2. [Abstract and Section VI] The abstract claims an average gain of 40 dB, while Section VI states an average gain of 38 dB; these numbers should be made consistent for the same bias condition.
  3. [Fig. 4(a)] The 40 K stage label should be clarified: is this a measured temperature or an assumed midpoint value, and are the two cable segments shown the actual thermalization stages?
  4. [General] The paper would benefit from a comparison table of published cryogenic LNAs (InP, SiGe, GaAs) including power, gain, noise, and frequency to contextualize the claimed performance.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the LNA's gain, noise temperature, and readout fidelity are measured outcomes, and the design targets are specifications rather than predictions derived from fitted inputs or self-citation chains.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are experimental measurements: 38 dB average gain, 5 K minimum equivalent noise temperature, and 98.3% average single-shot readout fidelity. The noise temperature is obtained with the cold-attenuator Y-factor method, in which the 20 dB input attenuator is assumed to be thermalized at 3.6 K and the input cable is represented by a midpoint temperature of approximately 40 K. These are calibration assumptions that affect the uncertainty of the extracted value, but they are not fitted parameters that are later renamed as predictions, and they do not make the result equivalent to its inputs by construction. The design targets (gain exceeding 35 dB, Te below 6 K, power consumption under 20 mW) are stated specifications, not outputs of a model fitted to the measured data. The paper does cite the authors' prior work, including a prior 5 K GaAs HEMT cryo-LNA (reference [40]) and several background references to the group's superconducting quantum processor work, but none of these citations is load-bearing for the new claim: the prior LNA is used only as a similar measurement setup example, and the characterization procedure is also supported by independent references ([42], [43], [44]). No uniqueness theorem, imported ansatz, or definitional identity is invoked to force the reported results. The skeptical concerns about the unquantified cable temperature profile and cold-attenuator thermalization are legitimate experimental-uncertainty issues, but they concern accuracy and error analysis, not circular reasoning. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained with respect to circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities or fitted parameters. It relies on standard MMIC design assumptions and a specific noise calibration assumption. The free-parameter list is empty because all operating points are chosen design settings, not parameters fitted to data. The main fragility is the noise calibration thermal profile.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Room-temperature pHEMT small-signal and noise models remain adequately predictive at 3.6 K after feedback and current-multiplexing modifications.
    Section III states that the first-stage bias is validated using room-temperature models; the cryogenic stability and noise performance rely on this extrapolation without a detailed cryogenic device characterization.
  • domain assumption The cold-attenuator Y-factor method yields accurate absolute noise temperature under the assumed thermal profile (20 dB attenuator at 3.6 K, cable midpoint at 40 K).
    Section IV uses this method to derive Te; any error in the assumed cable temperature or attenuator thermalization directly shifts the reported 5-6 K noise values.
  • domain assumption The single-shot readout fidelity is dominated by the LNA noise contribution and not by other unoptimized chain components.
    Section V attributes the 98.3% fidelity to the LNA without a parametric amplifier, but readout power, integration time, and resonator parameters are not reported, so the exact link between LNA noise and fidelity is not fully isolated.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A C-Band Cryogenic GaAs MMIC Low-Noise Amplifier for Quantum Applications." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WFVYCRIO

@misc{pith2026241219477,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A C-Band Cryogenic GaAs MMIC Low-Noise Amplifier for Quantum Applications},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WFVYCRIO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.19477}
}
read the original abstract

Large-scale superconducting quantum computers require massive numbers of high-performance cryogenic low-noise amplifiers (cryo-LNA) for qubit readout. Here we present a C-Band monolithic microwave integrated circuit (MMIC) cryo-LNA for this purpose. This cryo-LNA is based on 150 nm GaAs pseudomorphic high electron mobility transistor (pHEMT) process and implemented with a three-stage cascaded architecture, where the first stage adopts careful impedance match to optimize the noise and return loss. The integration of negative feedback loops adopted in the second and third-stage enhances the overall stability. Moreover, the pHEMT-self bias and current multiplexing circuitry structure facilitate the reduction of power consumption and require only single bias line. Operating at an ambient temperature of 3.6 K and consuming 15 mW, the cryo-LNA demonstrates good performance in the C-band, reaching a 5 K equivalent noise temperature and an average gain of 40 dB. We further benchmark this cryo-LNA with superconducting qubits, achieving an average single-shot dispersive readout fidelity of 98.3% without assistance from a quantum-limited parametric amplifier. The development of GaAs cryo-LNA diversifies technical support necessary for large-scale quantum applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.19477 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Overview of the readout process for superconducting qubits. (a) Simplified circuit schematic of the superconducting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Simplified schematic of the designed cryogenic LNA. (b) A close-up picture of the wire bonded LNA-chip. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The cryo-LNA performance at ambient temperature ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Schematic of the measurement setup for benchmarking the cryo-LNA at 3.6 K. The device under test (DUT) is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) The achieved I/Q scatter and histogram plots using the designed LNA for superconducting qubit measurement. (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Google Quantum AI, Suppressing quantum errors by scaling a surface code logical qubit, Nature 614, 676 (2023)

    2023

  2. [2]

    Google Quantum AI and Collaborators, Quantum er- ror correction below the surface code threshold, Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08449-y (2024). 7

    doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08449-y 2024

  3. [3]

    D. Gao et al., Establishing a new benchmark in quantum computational advantage with 105- qubit zuchongzhi 3.0 processor, arXiv.2412.11924 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.11924 (2024)

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.11924 2024

  4. [4]

    Cheng, X.-H

    B. Cheng, X.-H. Deng, X. Gu, Y. He, G. Hu, P. Huang, J. Li, B.-C. Lin, D. Lu, Y. Lu, C. Qiu, H. Wang, T. Xin, S. Yu, M.-H. Yung, J. Zeng, S. Zhang, Y. Zhong, X. Peng, F. Nori, and D. Yu, Noisy intermediate-scale quantum computers, Front. Phys. 18, 21308 (2023)

    2023

  5. [5]

    X. Yang, J. Chu, Z. Guo, W. Huang, Y. Liang, J. Liu, J. Qiu, X. Sun, Z. Tao, J. Zhang, J. Zhang, L. Zhang, Y. Zhou, W. Guo, L. Hu, J. Jiang, Y. Liu, X. Linpeng, T. Chen, Y. Chen, J. Niu, S. Liu, Y. Zhong, and D. Yu, Coupler-assisted leakage reduction for scalable quantum error correction with superconducting qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 170601 (2024)

    2024

  6. [6]

    J. Niu, L. Zhang, Y. Liu, J. Qiu, W. Huang, J. Huang, H. Jia, J. Liu, Z. Tao, W. Wei, Y. Zhou, W. Zou, Y. Chen, X. Deng, X. Deng, C. Hu, L. Hu, J. Li, D. Tan, Y. Xu, F. Yan, T. Yan, S. Liu, Y. Zhong, A. N. Cleland, and D. Yu, Low-loss interconnects for modular supercon- ducting quantum processors, Nature Electronics 6, 235 (2023)

    2023

  7. [7]

    J. Niu, Y. Li, L. Zhang, J. Zhang, J. Chu, J. Huang, W. Huang, L. Nie, J. Qiu, X. Sun, Z. Tao, W. Wei, J. Zhang, Y. Zhou, Y. Chen, L. Hu, Y. Liu, S. Liu, Y. Zhong, D. Lu, and D. Yu, Demonstrating path- independent anyonic braiding on a modular supercon- ducting quantum processor, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 020601 (2024)

    2024

  8. [8]

    N. Wu, J. Lin, C. Xie, Z. Guo, W. Huang, L. Zhang, Y. Zhou, X. Sun, J. Zhang, W. Guo, X. Linpeng, S. Liu, Y. Liu, W. Ren, Z. Tao, J. Jiang, J. Chu, J. Niu, Y. Zhong, and D. Yu, In situ mixer calibration for su- perconducting quantum circuits, Appl. Phys. Lett. 125, 204003 (2024)

    work page 2024

Show all 46 references
  1. [9]

    Barends, J

    R. Barends, J. Kelly, A. Megrant, D. Sank, E. Jef- frey, Y. Chen, Y. Yin, B. Chiaro, J. Mutus, C. Neill, P. O’Malley, P. Roushan, J. Wenner, T. C. White, A. N. Cleland, and J. M. Martinis, Coherent josephson qubit suitable for scalable quantum integrated circuits, Phys. Rev. L...

    2013

  2. [10]

    Y. Chen, C. Neill, P. Roushan, N. Leung, M. Fang, R. Barends, J. Kelly, B. Campbell, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, A. Dunsworth, E. Jeffrey, A. Megrant, J. Mutus, P. O’Malley, C. Quintana, D. Sank, A. Vainsencher, J. Wenner, T. White, M. R. Geller, A. Cleland, and J. M. Martinis, Qubit ...

    2014

  3. [11]

    F.Arute et al., Quantum supremacy using a pro- grammable superconducting processor, Nature 574, 505 (2019)

    2019

  4. [12]

    Q. Zhu, S. Cao, F. Chen, M.-C. Chen, X. Chen, T.-H. Chung, H. Deng, Y. Du, D. Fan, M. Gong, C. Guo, C. Guo, S. Guo, L. Han, L. Hong, H.-L. Huang, Y.- H. Huo, L. Li, N. Li, S. Li, Y. Li, F. Liang, C. Lin, J. Lin, H. Qian, D. Qiao, H. Rong, H. Su, L. Sun, L. Wang, S. Wang, D. Wu...

    2022

  5. [13]

    Krinner, S

    S. Krinner, S. Storz, P. Kurpiers, P. Magnard, J. Hein- soo, R. Keller, J. L¨ utolf, C. Eichler, and A. Wallraff, Engineering cryogenic setups for 100-qubit scale super- conducting circuit systems, EPJ Quantum Technol. 6, 2 (2019)

    2019

  6. [14]

    Wadefalk, A

    N. Wadefalk, A. Mellberg, I. Angelov, M. Barsky, S. Bui, E. Choumas, R. Grundbacher, E. Kollberg, R. Lai, N. Rorsman, P. Starski, J. Stenarson, D. Streit, and H. Zirath, Cryogenic wide-band ultra-low-noise if ampli- fiers operating at ultra-low dc power, IEEE Trans. Mi- crowav...

    2003

  7. [15]

    E. Cha, N. Wadefalk, G. Moschetti, A. Pourkabirian, J. Stenarson, and J. Grahn, Inp hemts for sub-mw cryo- genic low-noise amplifiers, IEEE Electron Device Lett. 41, 1005 (2020)

    2020

  8. [16]

    E. Cha, N. Wadefalk, G. Moschetti, A. Pourkabirian, J. Stenarson, and J. Grahn, A 300- µw cryogenic hemt lna for quantum computing, in 2020 IEEE/MTT-S In- ternational Microwave Symposium (IMS) (IEEE, 2020) pp. 1299–1302

    2020

  9. [17]

    Y. Zeng, J. Stenarson, P. Sobis, N. Wadefalk, and J. Grahn, Sub-mw cryogenic inp hemt lna for qubit readout, IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 72, 1606 (2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    E. Cha, N. Wadefalk, G. Moschetti, A. Pourkabirian, J. Stenarson, J. Li, D.-H. Kim, and J. Grahn, Opti- mization of channel structures in inp hemt technology for cryogenic low-noise and low-power operation, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 70, 2431 (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    Wu and C

    R. Wu and C. Wang, A 2-12ghz sige bicmos cryogenic lna with 6k noise temperature and 1.3mw dc power, in 2023 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Workshop Series on Advanced Materials and Processes for RF and THz Applications (IMWS-AMP) (IEEE, 2023) pp. 1–3

    2023

  12. [20]

    Z. Zou, S. Raman, and J. C. Bardin, A 1.6-mw cryo- genic sige lna ic for quantum readout applications achiev- ing 2.6-k average noise temperature from 3 to 6 ghz, IEEE Microwave and Wireless Technology Letters 34, 753 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    Y. Peng, J. Benserhir, M. Castaneda, A. Fognini, C. Br- uschini, and E. Charbon, A 0.32 ×0.12 mm2 cryogenic bicmos 0.1–8.8 ghz low noise amplifier achieving 4 k noise temperature for snwd readout, IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 72, 2179 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    Z. Tang, Z. Wang, A. Guo, L. Liu, C. Cao, X. Luo, W. Wu, Y. Guo, Z. Zhi, Y. Hu, Y. Cao, G. Shang, L. Yu, S. Hu, S. Chen, Y. Zhao, and X. Kou, Cryogenic cmos rf device modeling for scalable quantum computer design, IEEE Journal of the Electron Devices Society 10, 532 (2022)

    2022

  15. [23]

    Q. Xue, Y. Zhang, M. Wen, X. Zhai, Y. Chen, T. Lu, C. Luo, and G. Guo, Cryo-cmos modeling and a 600 mhz cryogenic clock generator for quantum computing appli- cations, Chip 2, 100065 (2023)

    2023

  16. [24]

    Pospieszalski, S

    M. Pospieszalski, S. Weinreb, R. Norrod, and R. Har- ris, Fets and hemts at cryogenic temperatures-their prop- erties and use in low-noise amplifiers, IEEE Trans. Mi- crowave Theory Tech. 36, 552 (1988)

    1988

  17. [25]

    Khandelwal and T

    S. Khandelwal and T. A. Fjeldly, Analysis of drain- current nonlinearity using surface-potential-based model in gaas phemts, IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 61, 3265 (2013)

    2013

  18. [26]

    A. J. Ardizzi, A. Y. Choi, B. Gabritchidze, J. Kooi, K. A. Cleary, A. C. Readhead, and A. J. Minnich, Self-heating 8 of cryogenic high electron-mobility transistor amplifiers and the limits of microwave noise performance, J. Appl. Phys. 132, 084501 (2022)

    2022

  19. [27]

    Risacher and V

    C. Risacher and V. Belitsky, Gaas hemt low-noise cryo- genic amplifiers from c-band to x-band with 0.7-k/ghz noise temperature, IEEE Microwave Wireless Compon. Lett. 13, 96 (2003)

    2003

  20. [28]

    Shimizu, Y

    H. Shimizu, Y. Iwashita, R. Iwamoto, T. Kawaguchi, and K. Nishikawa, 6 – 10 ghz cryogenic gaas phemt lna mmic, in 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Radio- Frequency Integration Technology (RFIT) (IEEE, 2020) pp. 103–105

    2020

  21. [29]

    Chiong, D.-J

    C.-C. Chiong, D.-J. Huang, C.-C. Chuang, Y.-J. Hwang, M.-T. Chen, and H. Wang, Cryogenic 8–18 ghz mmic lna using gaas phemt, in 2013 Asia-Pacific Microwave Conference Proceedings (APMC) (IEEE, 2013) pp. 261– 263

    2013

  22. [30]

    Jiang, L

    N. Jiang, L. B. G. Knee, D. Garcia, P. Niranjanan, M. Halman, and I. Wevers, Cryogenic l-band gaas hemt lna for the square kilometer array, in 2018 18th Interna- tional Symposium on Antenna Technology and Applied Electromagnetics (ANTEM) (IEEE, 2018) pp. 1–4

    2018

  23. [31]

    Heinz, F

    F. Heinz, F. Thome, and A. Leuther, Monolithically in- tegrated c-band low-noise amplifiers for use in cryogenic large-scale rf systems, IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 72, 2442 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    Krantz, M

    P. Krantz, M. Kjaergaard, F. Yan, T. P. Orlando, S. Gus- tavsson, and W. D. Oliver, A quantum engineer’s guide to superconducting qubits, Appl. Phys. Rev. 6, 021318 (2019)

    2019

  25. [33]

    Blais, A

    A. Blais, A. L. Grimsmo, S. Girvin, and A. Wallraff, Circuit quantum electrodynamics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025005 (2021)

    2021

  26. [34]

    Blais, R.-S

    A. Blais, R.-S. Huang, A. Wallraff, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Cavity quantum electrodynamics for superconducting electrical circuits: An architecture for quantum computation, Phys. Rev. A 69, 062320 (2004)

    2004

  27. [35]

    A. A. Houck, J. A. Schreier, B. R. Johnson, J. M. Chow, J. Koch, J. M. Gambetta, D. I. Schuster, L. Frunzio, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Con- trolling the spontaneous emission of a superconducting transmon qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 080502 (2008)

    2008

  28. [36]

    Jeffrey, D

    E. Jeffrey, D. Sank, J. Mutus, T. White, J. Kelly, R. Barends, Y. Chen, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, A. Dunsworth, A. Megrant, P. O’Malley, C. Neill, P. Roushan, A. Vainsencher, J. Wenner, A. Cleland, and J. M. Marti- nis, Fast accurate state measurement with superconduct- ing qubits, ...

    2014

  29. [37]

    Walter, P

    T. Walter, P. Kurpiers, S. Gasparinetti, P. Mag- nard, A. Potoˇ cnik, Y. Salath´ e, M. Pechal, M. Mondal, M. Oppliger, C. Eichler, and A. Wallraff, Rapid high- fidelity single-shot dispersive readout of superconducting qubits, Phys. Rev. Applied 7, 054020 (2017)

    2017

  30. [38]

    Gambetta, W

    J. Gambetta, W. A. Braff, A. Wallraff, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Protocols for optimal readout of qubits using a continuous quantum nondemolition mea- surement, Phys. Rev. A 76, 012325 (2007)

    2007

  31. [39]

    J. C. Bardin, Cryogenic low-noise amplifiers: Noise per- formance and power dissipation, IEEE Solid-State Cir- cuits Mag. 13, 22 (2021)

    2021

  32. [40]

    Y. Peng, Y. Zhong, Z. Guo, S. Liu, and D. Yu, A 3.5 7.5 ghz gaas hemt cryogenic low-noiseamplifier achieving 5 kelvin noise temperature for qubits measurement, in 2023 IEEE/MTT-S International Microwave Symposium - IMS 2023 (IEEE, 2023) pp. 672–675

    2023

  33. [41]

    Sabzi, M

    M. Sabzi, M. Kamarei, T. Razban, and Y. Mahe, Opti- mization of lna’s first stage to reduce overall noise figure in multi-stage lnas, AEU - International Journal of Elec- tronics and Communications 123, 153300 (2020)

    2020

  34. [42]

    Simbierowicz, V

    S. Simbierowicz, V. Vesterinen, J. Milem, A. Lin- tunen, M. Oksanen, L. Roschier, L. Gr¨ onberg, J. Hassel, D. Gunnarsson, and R. E. Lake, Characterizing cryo- genic amplifiers with a matched temperature-variable noise source, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 92, 034708 (2021)

    2021

  35. [43]

    Malnou, T

    M. Malnou, T. F. Q. Larson, J. D. Teufel, F. Lecocq, and J. Aumentado, Low-noise cryogenic microwave amplifier characterization with a calibrated noise source, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 95, 034703 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    Sheldon, L

    A. Sheldon, L. Belostotski, H. Mani, C. E. Groppi, and K. F. Warnick, Cryogenic noise-parameter measure- ments: Recent research and a fully automated measure- ment application, IEEE Microwave Mag. 22, 52 (2021)

    2021

  37. [45]

    Aumentado, Superconducting parametric amplifiers: The state of the art in josephson parametric amplifiers, IEEE Microwave Mag

    J. Aumentado, Superconducting parametric amplifiers: The state of the art in josephson parametric amplifiers, IEEE Microwave Mag. 21, 45 (2020)

    2020

  38. [46]

    Zhang, X

    J. Zhang, X. Sun, Z. Guo, Y. Yuan, Y. Zhang, J. Chu, W. Huang, Y. Liang, J. Qiu, D. Sun, Z. Tao, J. Zhang, W. Guo, J. Jiang, X. Linpeng, Y. Liu, W. Ren, J. Niu, Y. Zhong, and D. Yu, M2cs: A microwave measurement and control system for large-scale superconducting quan- tum proc...

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.