Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Metrics to Quantify Global Consistency in Synthetic Medical Images

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.00402 v1 pith:WGP44RBR submitted 2023-08-01 eess.IV cs.CV

classification eess.IVcs.CV
keywords imagesimageconsistencyglobalsyntheticmetricsmeasurequantify
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Image synthesis is increasingly being adopted in medical image processing, for example for data augmentation or inter-modality image translation. In these critical applications, the generated images must fulfill a high standard of biological correctness. A particular requirement for these images is global consistency, i.e an image being overall coherent and structured so that all parts of the image fit together in a realistic and meaningful way. Yet, established image quality metrics do not explicitly quantify this property of synthetic images. In this work, we introduce two metrics that can measure the global consistency of synthetic images on a per-image basis. To measure the global consistency, we presume that a realistic image exhibits consistent properties, e.g., a person's body fat in a whole-body MRI, throughout the depicted object or scene. Hence, we quantify global consistency by predicting and comparing explicit attributes of images on patches using supervised trained neural networks. Next, we adapt this strategy to an unlabeled setting by measuring the similarity of implicit image features predicted by a self-supervised trained network. Our results demonstrate that predicting explicit attributes of synthetic images on patches can distinguish globally consistent from inconsistent images. Implicit representations of images are less sensitive to assess global consistency but are still serviceable when labeled data is unavailable. Compared to established metrics, such as the FID, our method can explicitly measure global consistency on a per-image basis, enabling a dedicated analysis of the biological plausibility of single synthetic images.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Multi-Armed Bandit Approach for Optimizing Training on Synthetic Data

    cs.LG 2024-12 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A UCB-based training procedure switches between a diversity/photorealism score and a feature-cohesion score to select synthetic training images, reporting up to 10-point accuracy gains over static metrics.

Pith tools