Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 127 references

Cosmological Inflation in f(R,T) Gravity with Chern-Simons Correction

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Chern-Simons correction aligns inflation with CMB data

desk verdict Parameter-fit slow-roll for linear f(R,T)+CS; the perturbation formulas are imported without derivation, though a field rescaling likely saves them. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.20654 v1 pith:WH57NES7 submitted 2026-07-22 gr-qc

Maryam Shiravand , Saeed Fakhry , Mehrdad Farhoudi This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc PACS 98.80.Cq04.50.Kd98.80.Es98.80.-k
keywords cosmologicalinflationf(RT)gravityChern-Simonscorrectionslow-rollparameterstensor-to-scalarratioscalarspectralindextensorhilltoppotential
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that a parity-violating Chern-Simons correction, motivated by quantum gravity, can be added to a simple linear f(R,T) gravity model while keeping inflation viable and observationally accurate. Because the correction drops out of the background Friedmann equations but enters the tensor perturbation sector through a new slow-roll parameter, it refines the tensor spectral index and the tensor-to-scalar ratio without changing the scalar spectral index. With a power-law potential and trigonometric coupling the model matches current CMB constraints; with a hilltop potential and exponential coupling it also satisfies the tighter joint CMB, lensing, and baryon-acoustic-oscillation bound on r. If correct, this offers a minimal extension of general relativity plus an inflaton in which a quantum-gravity-motivated correction tightens, rather than destroys, agreement with observations.

What carries the argument

The sixth slow-roll parameter ε6, built from the Chern-Simons coupling ν(ϕ) and its derivatives, is the carrier of the correction. It modifies the tensor spectral index n_T = -2(ε1+ε6)/(1-ε1) and, through the polarization-dependent Q_t = F + 2kλ_i ν' φ̇/a, the tensor-to-scalar ratio r. Since the Chern-Simons term does not appear in the background Friedmann equations, ε6 isolates the parity-violating effect on tensor perturbations.

What would settle it

Numerically integrate the exact tensor and scalar perturbation equations in this f(R,T) plus Chern-Simons model without the slow-roll truncation; if the resulting n_S, n_T, and r for N between 50 and 70 fall outside the paper's reported ranges, the central claim collapses. A simpler observational test: a CMB experiment measuring r below the model's floor for the exponential-coupling case would rule out that branch.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Using the linear form f(R,T)=R+βκ²T and an inflaton field with Chern-Simons coupling ν(ϕ)R̃R, the paper derives slow-roll parameters under the usual approximations. The Chern-Simons term has no effect on the background Hubble evolution, but it generates a non-zero sixth slow-roll parameter ε6 that enters the tensor spectral index and the tensor-to-scalar ratio via the polarization-dependent tensor mode function Q_t. The authors compute n_S, n_T, and r for a power-law potential with trigonometric coupling and a hilltop potential with exponential coupling, fix free parameters to satisfy slow-roll, and find the predictions consistent with current CMB bounds, with the exponential case imposing a

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the standard slow-roll approximations remain valid in this modified-gravity setting; the paper checks that |ε_i| is much less than 1 after fixing parameters but does not perform a full perturbative stability or next-order analysis.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If correct, a single-field inflation model in linear f(R,T) gravity with a Chern-Simons term is observationally viable, matching current CMB constraints on n_S and r for specific parameter ranges.
  • The exponential Chern-Simons coupling combined with the hilltop potential yields a stronger upper limit on r than the trigonometric case, consistent with the joint CMB, lensing, and BAO data.
  • The scalar spectral index n_S depends only on the potential power n and the e-folding number N, so scalar measurements do not directly constrain the Chern-Simons sector.
  • Comparisons with and without the correction show differences in n_T and r of order 10^-3 or smaller, implying the correction refines rather than drastically alters the tensor predictions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural, testable consequence not developed in the paper: the parity-violating Chern-Simons coupling should generate a circularly polarized gravitational-wave background during inflation; the size of that polarization can be computed from ε6 and compared with future B-mode or gravitational-wave observatories.
  • Because the correction leaves the background unaffected, the model's slow-roll consistency reduces to the standard single-field conditions, so the usual degeneracies of single-field inflation carry over unchanged.
  • The non-linear f(R,T) case analyzed in the paper (R + ακ⁴ R T) gives slightly worse agreement with data, suggesting the linear form is not merely a calculational convenience; other non-linear couplings could be tested for compatibility.
  • The small O(10^-3) shifts imply current data give only weak constraints on the Chern-Simons coupling parameters; dedicated parameter estimation would be needed to separate β, Λ, φ1, and v.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies slow-roll inflation in the linear f(R,T) gravity model f(R,T)=R+βκ²T with a canonical inflaton and a parity-violating Chern-Simons term ν(ϕ)R̃R/8. It derives modified background Friedmann and Klein-Gordon equations, defines six slow-roll parameters, and considers two combinations: a power-law potential with trigonometric Chern-Simons coupling, and a hilltop potential with exponential coupling. The scalar spectral index n_S, tensor spectral index n_T, and tensor-to-scalar ratio r are computed with formulas taken from the Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet-Chern-Simons literature, and the results are compared with Planck 2018 and Planck+BK15+BAO constraints. The paper also examines limiting cases without the Chern-Simons term, without the linear f(R,T) term, and with a non-linear R+ακ⁴RT form. The main claim is that the Chern-Simons correction 'approximately refines' n_T and r and brings the model into agreement with the data.

Significance. If the perturbation formulas are genuinely applicable to action (1), the paper provides a concrete inflationary model in a modified-gravity setting, with the useful feature that the no-Chern-Simons limits reduce to standard single-field results (e.g., r=16ε₁). The algebra is explicit, the parameter dependences are displayed, and several self-identified caveats are acknowledged. However, the significance is materially reduced by three issues: the perturbation formulae are imported without a derivation for the f(R,T) action; the parameters used for the data comparison are openly tuned to the most favorable outcomes; and the quoted effects of the Chern-Simons term are sometimes as small as O(10⁻⁸), making the central 'refinement' claim statistically and observationally vacuous.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. II, Eqs. (28)–(30)] The spectral index formulas are taken from [75,80], which are Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet-Chern-Simons analyses, but the quadratic action for perturbations in the f(R,T)+CS theory (1) is never derived. For f(R,T)=R+βκ²T, the trace T depends on the metric and the scalar field; varying T with respect to g^{ab} produces extra β-dependent terms in the perturbed field equations that are not encoded in the slow-roll parameters (11) with F=E=1. The manuscript can be repaired by explicitly showing the reduction of the linear f(R,T) scalar sector to GR with a rescaled canonical field ψ=√(1+β)ϕ and potential U=(1+2β)V; the standard perturbation formulas would then apply. But this reduction is absent. As written, Eqs. (28)–(30) are asserted by citation, and the reported n_S, n_T and r need not follow from action (1).
  2. [Sec. III A1 (after Fig. 2); Figs. 4 and 9] The text states that 'the optimal values of the four free parameters (i.e., β, v, Λ, and φ₁) for the tensor-to-scalar ratio have been adjusted to the most favorable outcomes.' This is explicit parameter tuning, not constraining. No χ², likelihood, or error bars are provided for the model predictions, and the N range [50,70] is used as an additional adjustment knob. The agreement with Planck/BK15 is therefore a fit, not an independent prediction. A scan of the allowed parameter space or at least a sensitivity study is needed before the abstract can claim that the model 'provides accurate predictions'.
  3. [Secs. III A2, III B2; Sec. V] The central conclusion that the Chern-Simons correction 'refines' n_T and r is not supported by the numbers reported. In the power-law case the ratio differences are O(10⁻³); in the hilltop case the r ratio difference is stated to be O(10⁻⁸). Such effects are orders of magnitude below current observational precision and are given without any uncertainty. The claim of 'refinement' is therefore vacuously true in the hilltop case and unquantified in the power-law case. The conclusion should be tempered unless a statistical measure of the improvement is provided.
  4. [Sec. II (after Eq. (10)); Sec. V] The paper itself acknowledges that the usual slow-roll approximations 'warrant careful scrutiny' in richer modified-gravity models and defers a full perturbative stability and ghost-mode analysis to future work. Verifying |ε_i|≪1 numerically after fixing parameters does not establish that the slow-roll trajectory is an attractor of the full f(R,T)+CS system. If the reduction mentioned in the first comment is supplied, this caveat is less severe; but as presented, the validity of the leading-order perturbation calculation is not fully demonstrated.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. III A1] The choice β=10⁵, while β∈[0.1,1] in the hilltop case, is not motivated. A dimensionless matter-curvature coupling of this size invites a discussion of naturalness and of the regime of validity of the linear f(R,T) approximation.
  2. [Eq. (11) vs Eq. (13)] The slow-roll parameter ε₂ is defined with absolute values, but Eq. (13) gives a signed expression. For the hilltop potential ε₂ can change sign over the plotted range; please state the sign convention explicitly.
  3. [General] There are several grammatical issues, e.g., 'the closet extension' should be 'the closest extension', and 'its difference with 1' should be 'its difference from 1'. Figure captions should specify that all dimensionful constants are in reduced Planck units when numerical values such as φ₁=1/κ² and κ²=8π are used.
  4. [Sec. II] In the discussion after Eq. (8), the paper says the Chern-Simons term has 'non-participation in the field equations'; more precisely, its stress tensor vanishes on the FLRW background but contributes to perturbations. The wording should be clarified.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Planck agreement is produced by adjusting free parameters to favorable values; the claimed predictions reduce to parameter selection, while the observable formulas are imported from other theories.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. III A 1 (after Eq. 36), echoed in the Abstract]
    "As reported, the optimal values of the four free parameters (i.e., β, v, Λ, and ϕ1) for the tensor-to-scalar ratio have been adjusted to the most favorable outcomes, and when these parameters are chosen to alternative values (within reasonable limits), no improvement in the results has been achieved up to our investigations."

    The central claim is that the model 'provides accurate predictions' for n_S, n_T, r in agreement with Planck. But r (Eq. 33) and n_T (Eq. 32) depend on β, v, Λ, and φ1 through B and C (Eqs. 26–27), and the paper states these free parameters were 'adjusted to the most favorable outcomes.' Thus the agreement with the observed r/n_T region is obtained by construction: the reported values are a parameter selection, not a consequence of the action independent of these inputs. The only unadjusted output, n_S (Eq. 31), depends solely on n and N, which are also scanned in the ranges that match the Planck contour.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Sec. IV (non-linear f(R,T) model), discussion of Fig. 16]
    "Then, by inserting relations V(ϕ) = vϕ², (18), (67) and (69), while using relation (66), into relations (28), we also obtain r as a function of α and v. Accordingly, in Fig. 16, we have plotted these three inflationary observables in terms of the parameters α and v and for the specified values of the other parameters, all adjusted to achieve the most favorable outcomes."

    The same pattern recurs: the non-linear model's observables are plotted only after adjusting α, v, and the other parameters 'to achieve the most favorable outcomes' relative to Planck. This is an in-sample selection rather than an independent prediction; the claimed compatibility is effectively a restatement of the chosen parameter values. The paper presents the resulting agreement as a successful prediction, but by its own wording the agreement is a fit.

full rationale

The main circularity is statistical rather than definitional. The headline agreement with Planck 2018 is produced by scanning/adjusting free parameters (β, v, Λ, φ1 for the linear model; α, v, γ for the non-linear model) so that the derived r and n_T land on the observed contour. Equations (32)–(33) depend on these parameters through B and C, and the paper candidly states the parameters were 'adjusted to the most favorable outcomes.' Consequently, the claim of 'accurate predictions' reduces substantially to an in-sample fit. This is not a case of load-bearing self-citation: the slow-roll definitions and observable formulas are taken from external references [75], [80], and [122], and the paper's own prior work is used only as contextual citations. A separate, non-circular correctness risk is that Eqs. (28)–(30) are imported from Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet–Chern-Simons theories without deriving the scalar and tensor perturbation equations for the f(R,T)+CS action (1); if the β-dependent δT terms alter the perturbation action, the reported n_S, n_T, and r would not follow from action (1). That is a missing derivation/model-mismatch concern, not itself a circularity. Because the central 'prediction' is substantially parameter selection rather than an independent test, the circularity score is 6.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles or mediators are introduced; the Chern-Simons coupling functions and potentials are imported from prior literature. The central claim rests on free parameters chosen after data comparison and on the validity of the slow-roll and FLRW assumptions in the modified theory.

free parameters (8)
  • beta (f(R,T) coupling) = 10^5 (power-law); 0.1-1 (hilltop); 0 (GR limit)
    Chosen to bring (r,n_S) into the Planck/BK15 contours; Fig. 4 and text state values were adjusted for best outcomes.
  • n (power-law index) = 1.5-2 (best); 1.5-4 plotted
    Scanned after data comparison; n_S and r depend on n.
  • N (e-folding number) = 50-70; best 60-70
    Scanned after data; observables depend on N.
  • Lambda (CS coupling amplitude) = 0.1 or 0.01 (power-law); 10^-4 (nonlinear/beta=0)
    Set by hand to control epsilon_6; affects n_T and r.
  • v (potential amplitude) = 1/(8*pi)^2
    Set by hand; enters epsilon_6 and r through combinations like kappa*Lambda*v.
  • phi_1 (CS trigonometric period) = 1/kappa^2
    Set by hand; enters epsilon_6 and r.
  • gamma (hilltop potential parameter) = 2-10; best pairs (0.4,4), (0.5,5), (0.6,6)
    Scanned; controls n_S and r in the hilltop case.
  • alpha (nonlinear RT coupling) = 10^-5 to 10^-4
    Scanned in Sec. IV to fit Planck; only approximate agreement is claimed.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption FLRW background with homogeneous inflaton phi=phi(t)
    Used throughout Sec. II to derive the modified Friedmann and Klein-Gordon equations.
  • domain assumption Usual slow-roll conditions ˙phi^2 << V and |¨phi| << H|˙phi| hold in the modified theory
    Invoked after Eq. (10); the paper verifies small epsilon_i only after fixing parameters, without a full proof of validity.
  • domain assumption Chern-Simons term does not contribute to background Friedmann equations in FLRW
    Stated in Sec. II: the term only affects tensor perturbations. If false, the background slow-roll formulas would change.
  • domain assumption Scalar-field trace used in f(R,T) coupling is T[phi] = ˙phi^2 - 4V ≈ -4V
    Used to derive the effective Friedmann equations and in the non-linear case, Eq. (60).
  • domain assumption The observable formulas (28)-(30) from Refs. [75,80] apply to this f(R,T)+CS model
    The paper imports the slow-roll observable definitions without re-deriving them for the f(R,T) background.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Cosmological Inflation in f(R,T) Gravity with Chern-Simons Correction." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WH57NES7

@misc{pith2026260720654,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Cosmological Inflation in f(R,T) Gravity with Chern-Simons Correction},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WH57NES7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.20654}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate cosmological inflation within the framework of a linear form of f (R, T ) gravity that incorporates an inflaton scalar field augmented by a Chern-Simons correction induced by aspects of quantum gravity. Utilizing the FLRW metric, we derive the modified Friedmann equations under the slow-roll approximations. We consider two specific forms of the Chern-Simons coupling function, trigonometric and exponential, each paired with the choice of an inflaton potential. Then, we define the essential slow-roll parameters and acquire their required expressions in the proposed model. Subsequently, we compute the scalar spectral index, the tensor spectral index, and the tensor-to- scalar ratio. By adequately constraining the free parameters, the proposed model provides accurate predictions for these inflationary observables that are in good agreement with the Planck 2018 data. Furthermore, the model predictions for the Chern-Simons exponential coupling function impose a stronger limit on the value of the tensor-to-scalar ratio and also provide good agreement with the joint Planck, BK15 and BAO data. Meanwhile, for comparative analysis and better comparison of the model motivations, we also examine the model without the Chern-Simons correction, without the linear form of f (R, T ) gravity, and with a non-linear form of f (R, T ) gravity. As a general conclusion, the obtained findings indicate that the inclusion of the Chern-Simons correction approximately refines the values of the tensor spectral index and tensor-to-scalar ratio in the context of the linear form of f (R, T ) gravity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.20654 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. [color online] The slow-roll parameters have been plotted in terms of the e-folding number, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. [color online] The inflationary observables have been plotted in terms of the e-folding number, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. [color online] The effective equation of state param [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (13 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. [color online] Predictions of the linear form of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. [color online] The inflationary observables have been plotted in terms of the e-folding number and the potential power [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. [color online] The slow-roll parameters have been plotted in terms of the parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. [color online] The inflationary observables have been plotted in terms of the parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. [color online] The effective equation of state param [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. [color online] Predictions of the linear form [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. [color online] The inflationary observable [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. The slow-roll parameters have been plotted in terms of the parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. The inflationary observables have been plotted in terms of the parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. The effective equation of state parameter during [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. [color online] The slow-roll parameters have been plotted in terms of the parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. [color online] The effective equation of state parameter during inflation has been plotted in terms of the parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. [color online] The inflationary observables have been plotted in terms of the parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_16.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

127 extracted references · 6 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Cosmological tests of gravity

    P.G. Ferreira, “Cosmological tests of gravity”,Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.57, 335 (2019)

    2019

  2. [2]

    First year Wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (WMAP) observations: Determina- tion of cosmological parameters

    D.N. Spergelet al., “First year Wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (WMAP) observations: Determina- tion of cosmological parameters”,Astrophys. J. Suppl. 148, 175 (2003)

    2003

  3. [3]

    Wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (WMAP) three year results: Implications for cos- mology

    D.N. Spergelet al., “Wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (WMAP) three year results: Implications for cos- mology”,Astrophys. J. Suppl.170, 377 (2007)

    2007

  4. [4]

    Seven-year Wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (WMAP) observations: Cosmological interpretation

    E. Komatsuet al., “Seven-year Wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (WMAP) observations: Cosmological interpretation”,Astrophys. J. Suppl.192, 18 (2011)

    2011

  5. [5]

    Nine-year Wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (WMAP) observations: Cosmological parameter results

    G. Hinshawet al., “Nine-year Wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (WMAP) observations: Cosmological parameter results”,Astrophys. J. Suppl.208, 19 (2013)

    2013

  6. [6]

    Planck 2018 results. X. constraints on inflation

    Y. Akramiet al., “Planck 2018 results. X. constraints on inflation”,Astron. Astrophys.641, A10 (2020)

    2018

  7. [7]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. cosmolog- ical parameters

    N. Aghanimet al., “Planck 2018 results. VI. cosmolog- ical parameters”,Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020). Erratum:Astron. Astrophys.652, C4 (2021)

    2018

  8. [8]

    Theoretical cosmology

    A.A. Coley and G.F.R. Ellis, “Theoretical cosmology”, Class. Quant. Grav.37, 013001 (2020)

    2020

Show all 127 references
  1. [9]

    A new type of isotropic cosmologi- cal models without singularity

    A.A. Starobinsky, “A new type of isotropic cosmologi- cal models without singularity”,Phys. Lett. B91, 99 (1980)

    1980

  2. [10]

    Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems

    A.H. Guth, “Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems”,Phys. Rev. D23, 347 (1981)

    1981

  3. [11]

    A new inflationary universe scenario: A possible solution of the horizon, flatness, homogene- ity, isotropy and primordial monopole problems

    A.D. Linde, “A new inflationary universe scenario: A possible solution of the horizon, flatness, homogene- ity, isotropy and primordial monopole problems”,Phys. 17 Lett. B108, 389 (1982)

    1982

  4. [12]

    Cosmology for grand unified theories with radiatively induced symmetry breaking

    A. Albrecht and P.J. Steinhardt, “Cosmology for grand unified theories with radiatively induced symmetry breaking”,Phys. Rev. Lett.48, 1220 (1982)

    1982

  5. [13]

    An introduction to cosmological infla- tion

    A.R. Liddle, “An introduction to cosmological infla- tion”,arXiv: astro-ph/9901124

    arXiv

  6. [14]

    TASI lectures on inflation

    D. Baumann, “TASI lectures on inflation”,arXiv: 0907.5424

    arXiv

  7. [15]

    Encyclopædia inflationaris

    J. Martin, C. Ringeval and V. Vennin, “Encyclopædia inflationaris”,Phys. Dark Univ.5-6, 75 (2014)

    2014

  8. [16]

    Recent advances on inflation

    S.D. Odintsov, V.K. Oikonomou, I. Giannakoudi, F.P. Fronimos and E.C. Lymperiadou, “Recent advances on inflation”,Symmetry15, 1701 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    On the present status of inflationary cosmology

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde, “On the present status of inflationary cosmology”,Gen. Relativ. Gravit.57, 135 (2025)

    2025

  10. [18]

    The 2dF galaxy redshift survey: The power spectrum and the matter content of the universe

    W.J. Percivalet al.[2dFGRS], “The 2dF galaxy redshift survey: The power spectrum and the matter content of the universe”,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.327, 1297 (2001)

    2001

  11. [19]

    First year Wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (WMAP) observations: Implications for inflation

    H.V. Peiriset al., “First year Wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (WMAP) observations: Implications for inflation”,Astrophys. J. Suppl.148, 213 (2003)

    2003

  12. [20]

    The 3-D power spectrum of galaxies from the SDSS

    M. Tegmarket al.[SDSS], “The 3-D power spectrum of galaxies from the SDSS”,Astrophys. J.606, 702 (2004)

    2004

  13. [21]

    Cosmological parameters from SDSS and WMAP

    M. Tegmarket al.[SDSS], “Cosmological parameters from SDSS and WMAP”,Phys. Rev. D69, 103501 (2004)

    2004

  14. [22]

    Class of quintessential inflation models with pa- rameter space consistent with BICEP2

    M.W. Hossain, R. Myrzakulov, M. Sami and E.N. Sari- dakis, “Class of quintessential inflation models with pa- rameter space consistent with BICEP2”,Phys. Rev. D 89, 123513 (2014)

    2014

  15. [23]

    The best inflationary models after Planck

    J. Martin, C. Ringeval, R. Trotta and V. Vennin, “The best inflationary models after Planck”,J. Cosmol. As- tropart. Phys.03, 039 (2014)

    2014

  16. [24]

    Quintessential inflation with canonical and noncanonical scalar fields and Planck 2015 results

    C.Q. Geng, M.W. Hossain, R. Myrzakulov, M. Sami and E.N. Saridakis, “Quintessential inflation with canonical and noncanonical scalar fields and Planck 2015 results”, Phys. Rev. D92, 023522 (2015)

    2015

  17. [25]

    The observational status of cosmic inflation after Planck

    J. Martin, “The observational status of cosmic inflation after Planck”,Astrophys. Space Sci. Proc.45, 41 (2016)

    2016

  18. [26]

    Inflation model constraints from data released in 2015

    Q.G. Huang, K. Wang and S. Wang, “Inflation model constraints from data released in 2015”,Phys. Rev. D 93, 103516 (2016)

    2015

  19. [27]

    The confrontation between general relativ- ity and experiment

    C.M. Will, “The confrontation between general relativ- ity and experiment”,Living Rev. Relativ.9, 3 (2006)

    2006

  20. [28]

    Testing general relativity in cosmology

    M. Ishak, “Testing general relativity in cosmology”,Liv- ing Rev. Relativ.22, 1 (2019)

    2019

  21. [29]

    Chern-Simons modification of general relativity

    R. Jackiw and S.Y. Pi, “Chern-Simons modification of general relativity”,Phys. Rev. D68, 104012 (2003)

    2003

  22. [30]

    On higher order gravities, their analogy to GR, and dimensional dependent version of Duff’s trace anomaly relation

    M. Farhoudi, “On higher order gravities, their analogy to GR, and dimensional dependent version of Duff’s trace anomaly relation”,Gen. Relativ. Gravit.38, 1261 (2006)

    2006

  23. [31]

    Chern-Simons modified general relativity

    S. Alexander and N. Yunes, “Chern-Simons modified general relativity”,Phys. Rept.480, 1 (2009)

    2009

  24. [32]

    Lovelock tensor as generalized Einstein tensor

    M. Farhoudi, “Lovelock tensor as generalized Einstein tensor”,Gen. Relativ. Gravit.41, 117 (2009)

    2009

  25. [33]

    f(R) theories

    A. De Felice and S. Tsujikawa, “f(R) theories”,Living Rev. Relativ.13, 3 (2010)

    2010

  26. [34]

    f(R) theories of gravity

    T.P. Sotiriou and V. Faraoni, “f(R) theories of gravity”, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 451 (2010)

    2010

  27. [35]

    Extended theories of gravity

    S. Capozziello and M. De Laurentis, “Extended theories of gravity”,Phys. Rep.509, 167 (2011)

    2011

  28. [36]

    f(R, T) gravity

    T. Harko, F.S.N. Lobo, S. Nojiri and S.D. Odintsov, “f(R, T) gravity”,Phys. Rev. D84, 024020 (2011)

    2011

  29. [37]

    f(Lovelock) theories of gravity

    P. Bueno, P.A. Cano, ´O. Lasso A. and P.F. Ram ´ ırez, “f(Lovelock) theories of gravity”,J. High Energy Phys. 04, 028 (2016)

    2016

  30. [38]

    Ensemble average theory of gravity

    N. Khosravi, “Ensemble average theory of gravity”, Phys. Rev. D94, 124035 (2016)

    2016

  31. [39]

    Selected topics in scalar-tensor theories and beyond

    I. Quiros, “Selected topics in scalar-tensor theories and beyond”,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D28, 1930012 (2019)

    2019

  32. [40]

    Accel- erating universe inf(R) brane gravity

    K. Atazadeh, M. Farhoudi and H.R. Sepangi, “Accel- erating universe inf(R) brane gravity”,Phys. Lett. B 660, 275 (2008)

    2008

  33. [41]

    Dynamical Chern-Simons modified gravity: Spinning black holes in the slow- rotation approximation

    N. Yunes and F. Pretorius, “Dynamical Chern-Simons modified gravity: Spinning black holes in the slow- rotation approximation”,Phys. Rev. D79, 084043 (2009)

    2009

  34. [42]

    Modified gravity and cosmology

    T. Clifton, P.G. Ferreira, A. Padilla and C. Skordis, “Modified gravity and cosmology”,Phys. Rep.513, 1 (2012)

    2012

  35. [43]

    Chameleonic generalized Brans-Dicke model and late-time acceleration

    H. Farajollahi, M. Farhoudi, A. Salehi and H. Sho- jaie, “Chameleonic generalized Brans-Dicke model and late-time acceleration”,Astrophys. Space Sci.337, 415 (2012)

    2012

  36. [44]

    Dark energy from fifth dimensional Brans-Dicke theory

    A.F. Bahrehbakhsh, M. Farhoudi and H. Vakili, “Dark energy from fifth dimensional Brans-Dicke theory”,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D22, 1350070 (2013)

    2013

  37. [45]

    Cosmological and solar system consequences off(R, T) gravity models

    H. Shabani and M. Farhoudi, “Cosmological and solar system consequences off(R, T) gravity models”,Phys. Rev. D90, 044031 (2014)

    2014

  38. [46]

    Beyond the cosmological standard model

    A. Joyce, B. Jain, J. Khoury and M. Trodden, “Beyond the cosmological standard model”,Phys. Rept.568, 1 (2015)

    2015

  39. [47]

    Cosmic acceleration from matter-curvature coupling

    R. Zaregonbadi and M. Farhoudi, “Cosmic acceleration from matter-curvature coupling”,Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 48, 142 (2016)

    2016

  40. [48]

    The Maxwell- Chern-Simons gravity, and its cosmological implica- tions

    Z. Haghani, T. Harko and S. Shahidi, “The Maxwell- Chern-Simons gravity, and its cosmological implica- tions”,Eur. Phys. J. C77, 514 (2017)

    2017

  41. [49]

    Modi- fied gravity theories on a nutshell: Inflation, bounce and late-time evolution

    S. Nojiri, S.D. Odintsov and V.K. Oikonomou, “Modi- fied gravity theories on a nutshell: Inflation, bounce and late-time evolution”,Phys. Rept.692, 1 (2017)

    2017

  42. [50]

    Energy con- ditions in mimetic-f(R) gravity

    Z. Haghani, M. Shiravand and S. Shahidi, “Energy con- ditions in mimetic-f(R) gravity”,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 27, 1850049 (2018)

    2018

  43. [51]

    Cosmological models with squared trace in modified gravity

    B. Mishra, S.K. Tripathy and S. Ray, “Cosmological models with squared trace in modified gravity”,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D29, 2050100 (2020)

    2020

  44. [52]

    The integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect in 4D Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity

    M. Ghodsi Y., A. Behnamfard, S. Fakhry and J.T. Firouzjaee, “The integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect in 4D Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity”,Phys. Dark Univ.35, 100918 (2022)

    2022

  45. [53]

    Chirality of grav- itational waves in Chern-Simonsf(R) gravity cosmol- ogy

    S.D. Odintsov and V.K. Oikonomou, “Chirality of grav- itational waves in Chern-Simonsf(R) gravity cosmol- ogy”,Phys. Rev. D105, 104054 (2022)

    2022

  46. [54]

    Solutions of a slowly ro- tating Kerr flat-horizon black hole in dynamical Chern- Simons modified gravity

    G.G.L. Nashed and K. Bamba, “Solutions of a slowly ro- tating Kerr flat-horizon black hole in dynamical Chern- Simons modified gravity”,Europhys. Lett.144, 29002 (2023)

    2023

  47. [55]

    Primordial black hole merger rate inf(R) Gravity

    S. Fakhry, “Primordial black hole merger rate inf(R) Gravity”,Astrophys. J.961, 8 (2024)

    2024

  48. [56]

    Gravitational waves in Chern-Simons-Gauss-Bonnet gravity

    T. Daniel, L. Jenks and S. Alexander, “Gravitational waves in Chern-Simons-Gauss-Bonnet gravity”,Phys. Rev. D109, 124012 (2024). 18

    2024

  49. [57]

    Primordial black hole-neutron star merger rate in modified grav- ity

    S. Fakhry, M. Shiravand and M. Farhang, “Primordial black hole-neutron star merger rate in modified grav- ity”,Astrophys. J.966, 235 (2024)

    2024

  50. [58]

    Com- pact binary merger rate with modified gravity in dark- matter spikes

    S. Fakhry, S. Gholamhoseinian and M. Farhang, “Com- pact binary merger rate with modified gravity in dark- matter spikes”,Astrophys. J.976, 248 (2024)

    2024

  51. [59]

    Slow-roll inflation with the Gauss-Bonnet and Chern-Simons corrections

    M. Satoh, “Slow-roll inflation with the Gauss-Bonnet and Chern-Simons corrections”,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.11, 024 (2010)

    2010

  52. [60]

    Chern- Simons inflation and baryogenesis

    S. Alexander, A. Marciano and D. Spergel, “Chern- Simons inflation and baryogenesis”,J. Cosmol. As- tropart. Phys.04, 046 (2013)

    2013

  53. [61]

    A numerical simu- lation of Chern-Simons inflation

    D. Garrison and C. Underwood, “A numerical simu- lation of Chern-Simons inflation”,Adv. Astron.2013, 207218 (2013)

    2013

  54. [62]

    Infla- tion inf(R, ϕ)-theories and mimetic gravity scenario

    R. Myrzakulov, L. Sebastiani and S. Vagnozzi, “Infla- tion inf(R, ϕ)-theories and mimetic gravity scenario”, Eur. Phys. J. C75, 444 (2015)

    2015

  55. [63]

    Cos- mological inflation inF(R,G) gravity

    M. De Laurentis, M. Paolella and S. Capozziello, “Cos- mological inflation inF(R,G) gravity”,Phys. Rev. D 91, 083531 (2015)

    2015

  56. [64]

    Gauss-Bonnet inflation

    P. Kanti, R. Gannouji and N. Dadhich, “Gauss-Bonnet inflation”,Phys. Rev. D92, 041302(R) (2015)

    2015

  57. [65]

    Mimetic gravity: A review of recent developments and applica- tions to cosmology and astrophysics

    L. Sebastiani, S. Vagnozzi and R. Myrzakulov, “Mimetic gravity: A review of recent developments and applica- tions to cosmology and astrophysics”,Adv. High Energy Phys.2017, 3156915 (2017)

    2017

  58. [66]

    Anisotropic inflation in Brans-Dicke gravity

    M. Tirandari and K. Saaidi, “Anisotropic inflation in Brans-Dicke gravity”,Nucl. Phys. B925, 403 (2017)

    2017

  59. [67]

    Chameleon field dynam- ics during inflation

    N. Saba and M. Farhoudi, “Chameleon field dynam- ics during inflation”,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D27, 1850041 (2018)

    2018

  60. [68]

    Inflationary universe in deformed phase space scenario

    S.M.M. Rasouli, N. Saba, M. Farhoudi, J. Marto and P.V. Moniz, “Inflationary universe in deformed phase space scenario”,Ann. Phys.393, 288 (2018)

    2018

  61. [69]

    Inflation driven by Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity

    S. Chakraborty, T. Paul and S. SenGupta, “Inflation driven by Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity”,Phys. Rev. D98, 083539 (2018)

    2018

  62. [70]

    Conformal inflation with chameleon coupling

    H. Bernardo, R. Costa, H. Nastase and A. Weltman, “Conformal inflation with chameleon coupling”,J. Cos- mol. Astropart. Phys.04, 027 (2019)

    2019

  63. [71]

    Cosmological inflation inf(X) gravity theory

    H.R. Kausar, R. Saleem and A. Ilyas, “Cosmological inflation inf(X) gravity theory”,Phys. Dark Univ.26, 100401 (2019)

    2019

  64. [72]

    Slow-roll inflation in scalar-tensor models

    L.N. Granda and D.F. Jimenez, “Slow-roll inflation in scalar-tensor models”,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.09, 007 (2019)

    2019

  65. [73]

    Inflation with a quar- tic potential in the framework of Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity

    E.O. Pozdeeva, M.R. Gangopadhyay, M. Sami, A.V. Toporensky and S.Y. Vernov, “Inflation with a quar- tic potential in the framework of Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity”,Phys. Rev. D102, 043525 (2020)

    2020

  66. [74]

    Inflation inf(R, T) gravity

    S. Bhattacharjee, J.R.L. Santos, P.H.R.S. Moraes and P.K. Sahoo, “Inflation inf(R, T) gravity”,Eur. Phys. J. Plus135, 576 (2020)

    2020

  67. [75]

    Rectifying Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet inflation in view of GW170817

    S.D. Odintsov, V.K. Oikonomou and F.P. Fronimos, “Rectifying Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet inflation in view of GW170817”,Nucl. Phys. B958, 115135 (2020)

    2020

  68. [76]

    Revisiting scalar tensor inflation by swampland criteria and reheating

    A. Mohammadi, T. Golanbari, J. Enayati, S. Jalalzadeh and K. Saaidi, “Revisiting scalar tensor inflation by swampland criteria and reheating”,arXiv: 2011.13957

    2011 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Slow-roll inflation inf(R, T) gravity and a modified Starobinsky-like inflationary model

    M. Gamonal, “Slow-roll inflation inf(R, T) gravity and a modified Starobinsky-like inflationary model”,Phys. Dark Univ.31, 100768 (2021)

    2021

  70. [78]

    No-go theorem for inflation in Ricci-inverse gravity

    T.Q. Do, “No-go theorem for inflation in Ricci-inverse gravity”,Eur. Phys. J. C81, 431 (2021)

    2021

  71. [79]

    Inflationary cosmology inf(R, T) modified gravity

    E.H. Baffou, M.J.S. Houndjo, I.G. Salako and T. Houngue, “Inflationary cosmology inf(R, T) modified gravity”,Ann. Phys.434, 168620 (2021)

    2021

  72. [80]

    Inflation with Gauss-Bonnet and Chern-Simons higher-curvature- corrections in the view of GW170817

    S.A. Venikoudis and F.P. Fronimos, “Inflation with Gauss-Bonnet and Chern-Simons higher-curvature- corrections in the view of GW170817”,Gen. Relativ. Gravit.53, 75 (2021)

    2021

  73. [81]

    Inflation in energy-momentum squared gravity in light of Planck 2018

    M. Faraji, N. Rashidi and K. Nozari, “Inflation in energy-momentum squared gravity in light of Planck 2018”,Eur. Phys. J. Plus137, 593 (2022)

    2018

  74. [82]

    Inflation in mimeticf(R, T) grav- ity

    S. Bhattacharjee, “Inflation in mimeticf(R, T) grav- ity”,New Astron.90, 101657 (2022)

    2022

  75. [83]

    Modified gravity models for inflation: In conformity with obser- vations

    X. Zhang, C.Y. Chen and Y. Reyimuaji, “Modified gravity models for inflation: In conformity with obser- vations”,Phys. Rev. D105, 043514 (2022)

    2022

  76. [84]

    Cosmolog- ical inflation inf(Q, T) gravity

    M. Shiravand, S. Fakhry and M. Farhoudi, “Cosmolog- ical inflation inf(Q, T) gravity”,Phys. Dark Univ.37, 101106 (2022)

    2022

  77. [85]

    Slow-roll inflation inf(R, T) gravity with aRTmixing term

    C.-Y. Chen, Y. Reyimuaji and X. Zhang, “Slow-roll inflation inf(R, T) gravity with aRTmixing term”, Phys. Dark Univ.38, 101130 (2022)

    2022

  78. [86]

    The inflated Chern-Simons number in spectator chromo-natural in- flation

    H. Bagherian, M. Reece and W.L. Xu, “The inflated Chern-Simons number in spectator chromo-natural in- flation”,J. High Energy Phys.01, 099 (2023)

    2023

  79. [87]

    Pertur- bation spectra of warm inflation inf(Q, T) gravity

    M. Shiravand, M. Farhoudi and P. Goodarzi, “Pertur- bation spectra of warm inflation inf(Q, T) gravity”, Astrophys. J.971, 138 (2024)

    2024

  80. [88]

    Cosmological inflation inf(Q,L m) gravity

    M. Shiravand, S. Fakhry, J.T. Firouzjaee and A. Tiz- fahm, “Cosmological inflation inf(Q,L m) gravity”, arXiv: 2511.09031

  81. [89]

    Inflation with Gauss- Bonnet correction and Higgs potential

    Z. Ahghari and M. Farhoudi, “Inflation with Gauss- Bonnet correction and Higgs potential”,Eur. Phys. J. C86, 601 (2026)

    2026

  82. [90]

    Current cosmologi- cal constraints on the curvature, dark energy and mod- ified gravity

    Y. Gong, X.m. Zhu and Z.H. Zhu, “Current cosmologi- cal constraints on the curvature, dark energy and mod- ified gravity”,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.415, 1943 (2011)

    1943

  83. [91]

    A challenge to the standard cos- mological model

    N.J. Secrest, S. von Hausegger, M. Rameez, R. Mo- hayaee and S. Sarkar, “A challenge to the standard cos- mological model”,Astrophys. J. Lett.937, L31 (2022)

    2022

  84. [92]

    Cosmological constraints from standardized non-CMB observations

    S. Cao, “Cosmological constraints from standardized non-CMB observations”,arXiv: 2304.05522

    arXiv

  85. [93]

    A quantum gravity extension of the inflationary scenario

    I. Agullo, A. Ashtekar and W. Nelson, “A quantum gravity extension of the inflationary scenario”,Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 251301 (2012)

    2012

  86. [94]

    Precise determination of the inflation- ary epoch and constraints for reheating

    G. German, “Precise determination of the inflation- ary epoch and constraints for reheating”,arXiv: 2002.11091

    2002 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Evolution of the universe during the infla- tionary epoch

    G. German, “Evolution of the universe during the infla- tionary epoch”,arXiv: 2007.13165

    2007 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Exploration of parameters inf(R, T) and comparison with type Ia supernovae data

    V.R. Siggia, E.D. Carlson and P.L. Pryor, “Exploration of parameters inf(R, T) and comparison with type Ia supernovae data”,Class. Quant. Grav.43, 035012 (2026)

    2026

  89. [97]

    Slow-roll inflation with a Gauss-Bonnet correction

    Z.K. Guo and D.J. Schwarz, “Slow-roll inflation with a Gauss-Bonnet correction”,Phys. Rev. D81, 123520 (2010)

    2010

  90. [98]

    Inflation coupled to a Gauss-Bonnet term

    P.X. Jiang, J.W. Hu and Z.K. Guo, “Inflation coupled to a Gauss-Bonnet term”,Phys. Rev. D88, 123508 (2013)

    2013

  91. [99]

    Obser- vational constraints on slow-roll inflation coupled to a Gauss-Bonnet term

    S. Koh, B.H. Lee, W. Lee and G. Tumurtushaa, “Obser- vational constraints on slow-roll inflation coupled to a Gauss-Bonnet term”,Phys. Rev. D90, 063527 (2014). 19

    2014

  92. [100]

    Exact inflation in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Gravity

    I.V. Fomin and S.V. Chervon, “Exact inflation in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Gravity”,Gravit. Cosmol.23, 367 (2017)

    2017

  93. [101]

    Special power- law inflation in the Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity

    Y. Younesizadeh and F. Younesizadeh, “Special power- law inflation in the Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity”,As- trophys. Space Sci.366, 96 (2021)

    2021

  94. [102]

    Inflationary mod- els with Gauss-Bonnet coupling in light of ACT obser- vations

    Y. Zhu, Q. Gao, Y. Gong and Z. Yi, “Inflationary mod- els with Gauss-Bonnet coupling in light of ACT obser- vations”,Eur. Phys. J. C85, 1227 (2025)

    2025

  95. [103]

    Starobin- sky like inflation and EGB gravity in the light of ACT

    Yogesh, A. Mohammadi, Q. Wu and T. Zhu, “Starobin- sky like inflation and EGB gravity in the light of ACT”, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.10, 010 (2025)

    2025

  96. [104]

    Inflation and dark energy fromf(R) gravity

    M. Artymowski and Z. Lalak, “Inflation and dark energy fromf(R) gravity”,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.09, 036 (2014)

    2014

  97. [105]

    Power-law inflation in thef(R) gravity

    A.K. Sharma and M.M. Verma, “Power-law inflation in thef(R) gravity”,Astrophys. J.926, 29 (2022)

    2022

  98. [106]

    An alternativef(R, T) gravity theory and the dark energy problem

    S. Chakraborty, “An alternativef(R, T) gravity theory and the dark energy problem”,Gen. Relativ. Gravit.45, 2039-2052 (2013)

  99. [107]

    Dark mat- ter fromf(R, T) gravity

    R. Zaregonbadi, M. Farhoudi and N. Riazi, “Dark mat- ter fromf(R, T) gravity”,Phys. Rev. D94, 084052 (2016)

    2016

  100. [108]

    Constraining dark energy equations of state inF(R, T) gravity

    A. Errahmani, A. Bouali, S. Dahmani, I.E. Bojaddaini and T. Ouali, “Constraining dark energy equations of state inF(R, T) gravity”,Phys. Dark Univ.45, 101512 (2024)

    2024

  101. [109]

    f(R, T) cosmological models in phase-space

    H. Shabani and M. Farhoudi, “f(R, T) cosmological models in phase-space”,Phys. Rev. D88, 044048 (2013)

    2013

  102. [110]

    Observational constraint in f(R, T) gravity from the cosmic chronometers and some standard distance measurement parameters

    P. Rudra and K. Giri, “Observational constraint in f(R, T) gravity from the cosmic chronometers and some standard distance measurement parameters”,Nucl. Phys. B967, 115428 (2021)

    2021

  103. [111]

    Cosmological aspects of f(R, T) gravity in a simple model with a parametriza- tion of q

    R. Nagpal and S.K.J. Pacif, “Cosmological aspects of f(R, T) gravity in a simple model with a parametriza- tion of q”,Eur. Phys. J. Plus136, 875 (2021)

    2021

  104. [112]

    Evaluation of cosmo- logical models inf(R, T) gravity in different dark energy scenario

    V.K. Bhardwaj and A. Pradhan, “Evaluation of cosmo- logical models inf(R, T) gravity in different dark energy scenario”,New Astron.91, 101675 (2022)

    2022

  105. [113]

    Cosmolog- ical sudden singularities inf(R, T) gravity

    T.B. Gon¸ calves, J.L. Rosa and F.S.N. Lobo, “Cosmolog- ical sudden singularities inf(R, T) gravity”,Eur. Phys. J. C82, 418 (2022)

    2022

  106. [114]

    Observational constraints and cosmological implications of scalar-tensorf(R, T) grav- ity

    A. Bouali, H. Chaudhary, T. Harko, F.S.N. Lobo, T. Ouali and M.A.S. Pinto, “Observational constraints and cosmological implications of scalar-tensorf(R, T) grav- ity”,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.526, 4192 (2023)

    2023

  107. [115]

    Note on Chern-Simons term correction to holographic entanglement entropy

    J.R. Sun, “Note on Chern-Simons term correction to holographic entanglement entropy”,J. High Energy Phys.05, 061 (2009)

    2009

  108. [116]

    Chern-Simons forms in gravitation theo- ries

    J. Zanelli, “Chern-Simons forms in gravitation theo- ries”,Class. Quant. Grav.29, 133001 (2012)

    2012

  109. [117]

    Extremal black holes in dynamical Chern-Simons gravity

    R. McNees, L.C. Stein and N. Yunes, “Extremal black holes in dynamical Chern-Simons gravity”,Class. Quant. Grav.33, 235013 (2016)

    2016

  110. [118]

    Weakly-gravitating objects in dynami- cal Chern-Simons gravity and constraints with gravity probe B

    Y. Nakamura, D. Kikuchi, K. Yamada, H. Asada and N. Yunes, “Weakly-gravitating objects in dynami- cal Chern-Simons gravity and constraints with gravity probe B”,Class. Quant. Grav.36, 105006 (2019)

    2019

  111. [119]

    Is quan- tum gravity a Chern-Simons theory?

    R. Bonezzi, O. Corradini and A. Waldron, “Is quan- tum gravity a Chern-Simons theory?”,Phys. Rev. D 90, 084018 (2014)

    2014

  112. [120]

    Ex- act fermionic Chern-Simons-Kodama state in quantum gravity

    S. Alexander, T. Daniel, M. Howard and M. Konig, “Ex- act fermionic Chern-Simons-Kodama state in quantum gravity”,Phys. Rev. D106, 106012 (2022)

    2022

  113. [121]

    Cou- pling fields to 3D quantum gravity via Chern-Simons theory

    A. Castro, I. Coman, J.R. Fliss and C. Zukowski, “Cou- pling fields to 3D quantum gravity via Chern-Simons theory”,Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 171602 (2023)

    2023

  114. [122]

    Classical evolution and quan- tum generation in generalized gravity theories including string corrections and tachyon: Unified analyses

    J.-c. Hwang and H. Noh, “Classical evolution and quan- tum generation in generalized gravity theories including string corrections and tachyon: Unified analyses”,Phys. Rev. D71, 063536 (2005)

    2005

  115. [123]

    Vac- uum instability in Chern-Simons gravity

    S. Dyda, E.E. Flanagan and M. Kamionkowski, “Vac- uum instability in Chern-Simons gravity”,Phys. Rev. D 86, 124031 (2012)

    2012

  116. [124]

    Parity breaking signatures from a Chern-Simons coupling during inflation: The case of non-Gaussian gravitational waves

    N. Bartolo and G. Orlando, “Parity breaking signatures from a Chern-Simons coupling during inflation: The case of non-Gaussian gravitational waves”,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.07, 034 (2017)

    2017

  117. [125]

    Chaotic inflation

    A.D. Linde, “Chaotic inflation”,Phys. Lett. B129, 177 (1983)

    1983

  118. [126]

    Some constraints on inflation mod- els with power law potentials

    S.A. Pavluchenko, “Some constraints on inflation mod- els with power law potentials”,Phys. Rev. D69, 021301(R) (2004)

    2004

  119. [127]

    Inflationary cosmol- ogy in a non-minimalf(R, T) gravity theory using aRT mixing term

    P. Sarkar, Ashmita and P.K. Das, “Inflationary cosmol- ogy in a non-minimalf(R, T) gravity theory using aRT mixing term”,Phys. Dark Univ.40, 101190 (2023)

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.