REVIEW 1 cited by
Charting the Landscape of Nefarious Uses of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Online Election Interference
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) and Large Language Models (LLMs) pose significant risks, particularly in the realm of online election interference. This paper explores the nefarious applications of GenAI, highlighting their potential to disrupt democratic processes through deepfakes, botnets, targeted misinformation campaigns, and synthetic identities. By examining recent case studies and public incidents, we illustrate how malicious actors exploit these technologies to try influencing voter behavior, spread disinformation, and undermine public trust in electoral systems. The paper also discusses the societal implications of these threats, emphasizing the urgent need for robust mitigation strategies and international cooperation to safeguard democratic integrity.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
What Are The Risks of Living in a GenAI Synthetic Reality? The Generative AI Paradox
This essay argues that generative AI's hyper-realistic, personalized content risks creating fragmented synthetic realities that erode shared truth.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.