Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

The Privatization of AI Research(-ers): Causes and Potential Consequences -- From university-industry interaction to public research brain-drain?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2102.01648 v2 pith:WHLC2EGT submitted 2021-02-02 cs.CY

classification cs.CY
keywords industryresearchersacademiaresearchanalysisconsequencesimpactpotential
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The private sector is playing an increasingly important role in basic Artificial Intelligence (AI) R&D. This phenomenon, which is reflected in the perception of a brain drain of researchers from academia to industry, is raising concerns about a privatisation of AI research which could constrain its societal benefits. We contribute to the evidence base by quantifying transition flows between industry and academia and studying its drivers and potential consequences. We find a growing net flow of researchers from academia to industry, particularly from elite institutions into technology companies such as Google, Microsoft and Facebook. Our survival regression analysis reveals that researchers working in the field of deep learning as well as those with higher average impact are more likely to transition into industry. A difference-in-differences analysis of the effect of switching into industry on a researcher's influence proxied by citations indicates that an initial increase in impact declines as researchers spend more time in industry. This points at a privatisation of AI knowledge compared to a counterfactual where those high-impact researchers had remained in academia. Our findings highlight the importance of strengthening the public AI research sphere in order to ensure that the future of this powerful technology is not dominated by private interests.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Red Teaming AI Policy: A Taxonomy of Avoision and the EU AI Act

    cs.CY 2025-06 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

    A taxonomy of avoision under the EU AI Act, with strategies to escape scope, exploit exemptions, and manipulate risk or operator categories.

  2. Irresponsible AI: big tech's influence on AI research and associated impacts

    cs.CY 2025-11 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A review/position paper arguing that big tech's outsized influence on AI research channels the field toward scaling and general-purpose systems, producing environmental and social harms that technical fixes alone cann...

Pith tools