REVIEW 1 cited by
Adjusting Interpretable Dimensions in Embedding Space with Human Judgments
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Embedding spaces contain interpretable dimensions indicating gender, formality in style, or even object properties. This has been observed multiple times. Such interpretable dimensions are becoming valuable tools in different areas of study, from social science to neuroscience. The standard way to compute these dimensions uses contrasting seed words and computes difference vectors over them. This is simple but does not always work well. We combine seed-based vectors with guidance from human ratings of where words fall along a specific dimension, and evaluate on predicting both object properties like size and danger, and the stylistic properties of formality and complexity. We obtain interpretable dimensions with markedly better performance especially in cases where seed-based dimensions do not work well.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Rethinking Word Similarity: Semantic Similarity through Classification Confusion
Word Confusion measures semantic similarity as classifier confusion between contextual embeddings, matching human judgments as well as or better than cosine similarity, and enables analyst-chosen feature dimensions.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.