Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Bias Disparity in Recommendation Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1811.01461 v1 pith:WJJJCF4L submitted 2018-11-04 cs.IR cs.CY

classification cs.IRcs.CY
keywords biasdatadisparitydifferentbiasesrecommendationsrecommenderrecommenders
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Recommender systems have been applied successfully in a number of different domains, such as, entertainment, commerce, and employment. Their success lies in their ability to exploit the collective behavior of users in order to deliver highly targeted, personalized recommendations. Given that recommenders learn from user preferences, they incorporate different biases that users exhibit in the input data. More importantly, there are cases where recommenders may amplify such biases, leading to the phenomenon of bias disparity. In this short paper, we present a preliminary experimental study on synthetic data, where we investigate different conditions under which a recommender exhibits bias disparity, and the long-term effect of recommendations on data bias. We also consider a simple re-ranking algorithm for reducing bias disparity, and present some observations for data disparity on real data.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Bias Disparity in Collaborative Recommendation: Algorithmic Evaluation and Comparison

    cs.IR 2019-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    On a Yelp sample, trust-aware neighborhood recommenders (TrustKNN) show lower bias disparity between demographic groups than matrix factorization and other model-based algorithms.

Pith tools