pith. sign in

arxiv: 2504.15007 · v2 · pith:WK6W7UESnew · submitted 2025-04-21 · 💻 cs.CV · cs.HC

Shifts in Doctors' Eye Movements Between Real and AI-Generated Medical Images

classification 💻 cs.CV cs.HC
keywords distributionimagespatternsattentionauthenticdoctorsfirstgaze
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Eye-tracking analysis plays a vital role in medical imaging, providing key insights into how radiologists visually interpret and diagnose clinical cases. In this work, we first analyze radiologists' attention and agreement by measuring the distribution of various eye-movement patterns, including saccades direction, amplitude, and their joint distribution. These metrics help uncover patterns in attention allocation and diagnostic strategies. Furthermore, we investigate whether and how doctors' gaze behavior shifts when viewing authentic (Real) versus deep-learning-generated (Fake) images. To achieve this, we examine fixation bias maps, focusing on first, last, short, and longest fixations independently, along with detailed saccades patterns, to quantify differences in gaze distribution and visual saliency between authentic and synthetic images.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.