pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.15826 · v1 · pith:WKYJY2RRnew · submitted 2026-05-15 · 🌊 nlin.PS · hep-ph

Front propagation in non-homogeneous φ⁴ model

Jacek Gatlik , Tomasz Dobrowolski , Dominika Lasa , Panayotis G. Kevrekidis This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 17:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌊 nlin.PS hep-ph
keywords front propagationinhomogeneous φ⁴kink dynamicshalf-kinkeffective modeldissipation inhomogeneitynonlinear waves
0
0 comments X

The pith

A modified effective model accurately reproduces half-kink propagation in the inhomogeneous φ⁴ model.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies the motion of fronts in the φ⁴ field theory when dissipation varies in space, either across an interface or within a finite layer. Full kink solutions in large domains are well captured by standard effective descriptions, but half-kinks that describe the decay from the unstable state φ=0 show clear mismatches with the same approach. The authors develop a modified effective model that restores agreement with the underlying field equations across a useful range of parameters. This matters because half-kinks model realistic front invasion in finite or semi-infinite systems where the standard reduction breaks down.

Core claim

In the non-homogeneous φ⁴ model, front propagation is studied using kink solutions in unbounded domains and half-kinks in finite systems. The effective description derived from the kink ansatz accurately predicts the dynamics when the inhomogeneity is an interface between regions of different dissipation. However, for half-kinks modeling the decay of φ=0 to the true vacuum, the standard reduction leads to deviations. A consistent modification to the effective model is proposed, which successfully reproduces the field-theory results for half-kink propagation over a relatively broad range of parameters.

What carries the argument

Modified effective model incorporating position-dependent dissipation for consistent half-kink dynamics.

If this is right

  • The standard effective kink approach accurately describes propagation across dissipation interfaces.
  • Direct application of the same reduction to half-kinks produces large deviations from the full field evolution.
  • The modified effective model matches field-theory speeds and shapes for both interface and layer inhomogeneities.
  • Agreement holds over a relatively broad range of dissipation contrasts and layer widths.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar modifications could improve effective models for other dissipative field theories with spatial inhomogeneities.
  • The approach may apply to front propagation in reaction-diffusion systems with heterogeneous media.
  • Numerical tests with time-varying inhomogeneities could extend the model's applicability.

Load-bearing premise

The inhomogeneity affects the system only by making the dissipation coefficient position-dependent, without changing the form of the potential or introducing additional terms in the effective dynamics.

What would settle it

Numerical simulation of the full φ⁴ PDE for a half-kink with a given dissipation profile, comparing the resulting front velocity to the modified effective model's prediction; significant mismatch would disprove the reproduction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.15826 by Dominika Lasa, Jacek Gatlik, Panayotis G. Kevrekidis, Tomasz Dobrowolski.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Comparison of kink trajectories from the field equation (solid black line) and the effective model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Changes in kink velocity when entering an area of increased dissipation. In both panels, the initial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Changes in kink velocity when passing through a layer with increased dissipation. In the left panel, the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Difference between the gradients of the stationary configuration and the initial condition (after shift [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Dependence of the velocity on time for a half-kink passing from a region of lower to a region of higher [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Half-kink velocity as a function of time. The black line corresponds to the field model, the orange line [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Changes in the half-kink velocity during crossing of a layer with modified dissipation. The solid black [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Changes in the half-kink velocity over a longer time horizon. The notations are the same as in Figure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Penetration of a half-kink from a medium with dissipation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The passage of a half-kink through a layer of increased dissipation for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The complex plane of eigenvalues Λ for particular values of the parameters Γ = 0.025, λ = 1 and η0 = 0.1. Panel (b) shows the dependence of the imaginary part of Λ on the coefficient η0. The blue region corresponds to the continuous spectrum, while the red line indicates the discrete mode. The imaginary values displayed in this panel are associated with the central blue–red line in panel (a), which repres… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The dependence of the eigenvalues of the linear perturbation problem on the damping in the system for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: (a) Velocity variations as a function of time for initial conditions ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Dependence of the integrals Jk , where k = 0, 1, 2, on the variable ℓ − x0. The dashed black lines corre￾spond to the asymptotic values. D Appendix We use the function g˜(x0) = 1 γ0 g(x0) from equation (52), which defines the ansatz. The function contains five coefficients ai , but they are functions of ε and η0. In fact, the function g˜ contains no free parameters other than those already present in the … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the propagation of fronts in an inhomogeneous medium within the framework of the $\phi^4$ model. The inhomogeneity is modeled either as an interface separating regions with different dissipation or as a finite layer with modified dissipation. The propagating front is described in two ways: as a kink solution in an effectively unbounded domain, and as a half-kink in a finite system. The half-kink represents the decay of the unstable state $\phi=0$ toward the true vacuum. We show that while the effective description based on the kink provides accurate results, applying a similar approach to the half-kink leads to significant deviations from the predictions of the field model. We then demonstrate that a consistent description does exist and propose a modified effective model which reproduces the field-theory results over a relatively broad range of parameters.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates front propagation in the inhomogeneous φ⁴ model, with inhomogeneity introduced either as an interface or a finite layer with modified dissipation. It compares the standard collective-coordinate (effective) description for a kink in an unbounded domain, which matches field-theory results, against the half-kink description in a finite system, which exhibits significant deviations. The central contribution is the construction of a modified effective model that incorporates the inhomogeneity solely through a position-dependent dissipation coefficient while leaving the potential unchanged, and that reproduces the full field-theory results for half-kink propagation over a relatively broad parameter range.

Significance. If the reproduction holds under detailed verification, the work supplies a practical reduced-order model for front dynamics where standard collective-coordinate methods break down. This addresses a concrete limitation in the effective description of half-kinks and could be useful for analyzing soliton-like propagation in spatially varying media. The explicit contrast between the two effective approaches and the full PDE simulations is a positive feature of the study.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §5 (modified model)] The claim that the modified effective model reproduces field-theory results “over a relatively broad range of parameters” (Abstract) is central to the paper’s contribution, yet the text provides neither explicit parameter intervals nor quantitative measures of agreement (e.g., relative L² errors or pointwise deviations). Without these, the robustness of the reproduction cannot be fully evaluated from the available material.
  2. [§2 (model setup) and §5] The modeling premise that inhomogeneity enters exclusively via a position-dependent dissipation term, with the potential and all other terms left unaltered (Abstract and the construction in §5), is load-bearing for the consistency of the reduced dynamics. A short derivation or scaling argument justifying why the potential remains unmodified would remove any ambiguity about whether the modification is derived or chosen to match the numerics.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Figures] Figure captions should list the specific parameter values (e.g., layer width, dissipation contrast) used in each panel so that readers can reproduce the comparison between the effective model and the field simulation.
  2. [§3 and §5] The notation for the position-dependent dissipation coefficient should be introduced once and used consistently; occasional switches between symbols or subscripts make the reduced equations harder to follow.
  3. [§4 (numerical methods)] A brief statement of the numerical scheme and spatial/temporal discretization used for the field-theory simulations would help assess the reliability of the reference data against which the effective models are tested.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work and for the constructive comments, which help clarify the scope and justification of the modified effective model. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §5 (modified model)] The claim that the modified effective model reproduces field-theory results “over a relatively broad range of parameters” (Abstract) is central to the paper’s contribution, yet the text provides neither explicit parameter intervals nor quantitative measures of agreement (e.g., relative L² errors or pointwise deviations). Without these, the robustness of the reproduction cannot be fully evaluated from the available material.

    Authors: We agree that the absence of explicit parameter intervals and quantitative error metrics limits the ability to assess the breadth and accuracy of the reproduction. In the revised manuscript we will add, in §5, a table or paragraph specifying the ranges of dissipation contrast and layer width over which comparisons were performed, together with quantitative measures such as relative deviations in propagation speed and L² profile errors between the effective model and direct field simulations. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§2 (model setup) and §5] The modeling premise that inhomogeneity enters exclusively via a position-dependent dissipation term, with the potential and all other terms left unaltered (Abstract and the construction in §5), is load-bearing for the consistency of the reduced dynamics. A short derivation or scaling argument justifying why the potential remains unmodified would remove any ambiguity about whether the modification is derived or chosen to match the numerics.

    Authors: The model construction in §2 introduces the inhomogeneity exclusively through the dissipation coefficient. The potential is left unchanged because it continues to set the equilibrium values and the shape of the front profile away from the inhomogeneous region. We will insert a short scaling argument in the revised §5 showing that, to leading order in the collective-coordinate projection, the contribution of the potential term to the effective force remains identical to the homogeneous case while the dissipative term acquires the position dependence; this follows directly from integrating the field equation against the translational mode. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation remains self-contained

full rationale

The paper explicitly identifies failure of the standard collective-coordinate approach for the half-kink case and then introduces a modified effective model under the stated modeling assumption that inhomogeneity enters solely via a position-dependent dissipation coefficient (with potential and other terms unchanged). This is presented as an independent, consistent reduction whose agreement with field-theory numerics over a parameter range serves as validation rather than a fitted tautology. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to its own inputs, no self-citation chain is invoked to force uniqueness, and the central claim retains independent content from the underlying field model. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only abstract available; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are identifiable beyond the standard φ⁴ setup with added position-dependent dissipation.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Inhomogeneity enters the model exclusively via a spatially varying dissipation coefficient while the φ⁴ potential remains unchanged.
    Core modeling choice stated in the abstract for both interface and finite-layer cases.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5677 in / 1089 out tokens · 48327 ms · 2026-05-19T17:46:16.329234+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Double sine-Gordon class of universal coarsening dynamics in a spin-1 Bose gas , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.1103/df5w-3yfd , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/df5w-3yfd 2025

  2. [2]

    Propagating Ferrodark Solitons in a Superfluid: Exact Solutions and Anomalous Dynamics , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2022 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.125301 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.125301 2022

  3. [3]

    Kevrekidis and Jes

    Panayotis G. Kevrekidis and Jes. A Dynamical Perspective on the. 2019 , doi =

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Dark-soliton-like magnetic domain walls in a two-dimensional ferromagnetic superfluid , author =. Phys. Rev. Res. , volume =. 2021 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.023043 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.023043 2021

  5. [5]

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.065012 , url =

    Relativistic Moduli Space for Kink Collisions , author =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.065012 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.065012

  6. [6]

    doi:10.1016/0001-6160(79)90196-2 , url =

    A Microscopic Theory for Antiphase Boundary Motion and Its Application to Antiphase Domain Coarsening , author =. doi:10.1016/0001-6160(79)90196-2 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/0001-6160(79)90196-2

  7. [7]

    doi:10.1016/0167-2789(83)90289-0 , url =

    Resonance Structure in Kink-Antikink Interactions in ^4 Theory , author =. doi:10.1016/0167-2789(83)90289-0 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/0167-2789(83)90289-0

  8. [8]

    , date =

    Caputo, Jean-Guy and Dobrowolski, Tomasz and Gatlik, Jacek and Kevrekidis, Panayotis G. , date =. Radial Kinks in a. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.125025 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.125025

  9. [9]

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.016010 , url =

    Long-Range Interactions of Kinks , author =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.016010 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.016010

  10. [10]

    Coleman, Fate of the false vacuum: Semiclassical theory, Phys

    Coleman, Sidney , date =. Fate of the False Vacuum:. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.15.2929 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.15.2929

  11. [11]

    Reviews of Modern Physics , volume =

    Pattern Formation Outside of Equilibrium , author =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.65.851 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.65.851

  12. [12]

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.111.024203 , url =

    Kink Movement on a Periodic Background , author =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.111.024203 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.111.024203

  13. [13]

    , date =

    Dobrowolski, Tomasz and Gatlik, Jacek and Bryłowska, Zofia and Kevrekidis, Panayotis G. , date =. Kink Dynamics in a Non-Autonomous Sine-. doi:10.1063/5.0284611 , url =

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0284611

  14. [14]

    , date =

    Dobrowolski, Tomasz and Gatlik, Jacek and Bryłowska, Zofia and Kevrekidis, Panayotis G. , date =. Parametric Resonance in the Non-Autonomous Sine-. doi:10.1063/5.0296470 , url =

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0296470

  15. [15]

    Front Propagation into Unstable States: Universal Algebraic Convergence towards Uniformly Translating Pulled Fronts , shorttitle =

    Ebert, Ute and Van Saarloos, Wim , date =. Front Propagation into Unstable States: Universal Algebraic Convergence towards Uniformly Translating Pulled Fronts , shorttitle =. doi:10.1016/S0167-2789(00)00068-3 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/s0167-2789(00)00068-3

  16. [16]

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.46.5214 , url =

    Resonant Kink-Impurity Interactions in the ^4 Model , author =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.46.5214 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.46.5214

  17. [17]

    , date =

    Galley, Chad R. , date =. Classical. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.174301 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.174301

  18. [18]

    , date =

    Gatlik, Jacek and Dobrowolski, Tomasz and Kevrekidis, Panayotis G. , date =. Kink-Inhomogeneity Interaction in the Sine-. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.108.034203 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.108.034203

  19. [19]

    and Cuenda, Sara and Sánchez, Angel , date =

    González, Jorge A. and Cuenda, Sara and Sánchez, Angel , date =. Kink Dynamics in Spatially Inhomogeneous Media:. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.75.036611 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.75.036611

  20. [20]

    and Haberman, Richard , date =

    Goodman, Roy H. and Haberman, Richard , date =. Kink-. doi:10.1137/050632981 , url =

    work page doi:10.1137/050632981

  21. [21]

    doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.60.781 , url =

    Solitons in Conducting Polymers , author =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.60.781 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.60.781

  22. [22]

    doi:10.1088/0034-4885/58/5/001 , url =

    Cosmic Strings , author =. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/58/5/001 , url =

    work page doi:10.1088/0034-4885/58/5/001

  23. [23]

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.16.777 , url =

    Solitons under Perturbations , author =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.16.777 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.16.777

  24. [24]

    Kevrekidis, P. G. and Khare, Avinash and Saxena, A. , date =. Solitary Wave Interactions in Dispersive Equations Using. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.70.057603 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.70.057603

  25. [25]

    Kevrekidis, P. G. , date =. Variational Method for Nonconservative Field Theories:. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.89.010102 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.89.010102

  26. [26]

    Kibble, Topology of cosmic domains and strings, J

    Topology of Cosmic Domains and Strings , author =. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/9/8/029 , url =

    work page doi:10.1088/0305-4470/9/8/029

  27. [27]

    doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.61.763 , url =

    Dynamics of Solitons in Nearly Integrable Systems , author =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.61.763 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.61.763

  28. [28]

    Manton, N. S. and Oleś, K. and Romańczukiewicz, T. and Wereszczyński, A. , date =. Collective. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.071601 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.071601

  29. [29]

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.18.1652 , url =

    Perturbation Analysis of Fluxon Dynamics , author =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.18.1652 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.18.1652

  30. [30]

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.28.3587 , url =

    Physical Dynamics of Solitons , author =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.28.3587 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.28.3587

  31. [31]

    doi:10.1016/j.cnsns.2015.05.012 , url =

    Kink Scattering from a Parity-Time-Symmetric Defect in the ^4 Model , author =. doi:10.1016/j.cnsns.2015.05.012 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cnsns.2015.05.012 2015

  32. [32]

    Su, W. P. and Schrieffer, J. R. and Heeger, A. J. , date =. Solitons in. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.42.1698 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.42.1698

  33. [33]

    and Martinez, E

    Torrejon, J. and Martinez, E. and Hayashi, M. , title =. Nature Communications , volume =. 2016 , doi =

    work page 2016

  34. [34]

    , date =

    Sugiyama, T. , date =. Kink-. doi:10.1143/PTP.61.1550 , url =

    work page doi:10.1143/ptp.61.1550

  35. [36]

    doi:10.1016/0370-1573(85)90033-X , url =

    Cosmic Strings and Domain Walls , author =. doi:10.1016/0370-1573(85)90033-X , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-1573(85)90033-x

  36. [37]

    doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2024.114789 , url =

    Topologically Protected Metastable States in Classical Dynamics , author =. doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2024.114789 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2024.114789 2024

  37. [38]

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.7.013096 , url =

    Universal Critical Holography and Domain Wall Formation , author =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.7.013096 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.7.013096

  38. [39]

    and Kapitula, T

    Demirkaya, A. and Kapitula, T. and Kevrekidis, P.G. and Stanislavova, M. and Stefanov, A. , title =. Studies in Applied Mathematics , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/sapm.12053 , url =. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/sapm.12053 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1111/sapm.12053

  39. [40]

    doi:10.1038/nmat4518 , url =

    Chiral Damping of Magnetic Domain Walls , author =. doi:10.1038/nmat4518 , url =

    work page doi:10.1038/nmat4518

  40. [41]

    Safeer, C. K. and Nsibi, Mohamed-Ali and Nath, Jayshankar and Gabor, Mihai Sebastian and Yang, Haozhe and Joumard, Isabelle and Auffret, Stephane and Gaudin, Gilles and Miron, Ioan-Mihai , date =. Effect of. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28815-6 , url =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28815-6

  41. [42]

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.93.214429 , url =

    Phenomenology of Chiral Damping in Noncentrosymmetric Magnets , author =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.93.214429 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.93.214429

  42. [43]

    and Kevrekidis, Panayotis G

    Saadatmand, Danial and Borisov, Denis I. and Kevrekidis, Panayotis G. and Zhou, Kun and Dmitriev, Sergey V. , date =. Resonant Interaction of ^4 Kink with. doi:10.1016/j.cnsns.2017.07.019 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cnsns.2017.07.019 2017

  43. [44]

    Symmetry Breaking with a Slant: Topological Defects after an Inhomogeneous Quench , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 1999 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.4749 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.4749 1999

  44. [45]

    Zurek, W. H. and Bettencourt, L. M. A. and Dziarmaga, J. and Antunes, N. D. Shards of Broken Symmetry. Topological Defects and the Non-Equilibrium Dynamics of Symmetry Breaking Phase Transitions. 2000. doi:10.1007/978-94-011-4106-2_5

    work page doi:10.1007/978-94-011-4106-2_5 2000

  45. [46]

    Effective description of the impact of inhomogeneities on the movement of the kink front in 2+1 dimensions , author =. Phys. Rev. E , volume =. 2024 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.109.024205 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.109.024205 2024

  46. [47]

    Barashenkov, I. V. and Oxtoby, O. F. , journal =. Wobbling kinks in. 2009 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.80.026608 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.80.026608 2009

  47. [48]

    Bray , title =

    A.J. Bray , title =. Advances in Physics , volume =. 1994 , publisher =. doi:10.1080/00018739400101505 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1080/00018739400101505 1994

  48. [49]

    Universal Scaling in the Motion of Random Interfaces , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 1982 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.1223 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.49.1223 1982

  49. [50]

    Front propagation into unstable states , journal =

    Wim. Front propagation into unstable states , journal =. 2003 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2003.08.001 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2003.08.001 2003