Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 10 cited by

Insight into the Starburst Nature of Galaxy GN-z11 with JWST MIRI Spectroscopy

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read New MIRI spectroscopy shows GN-z11 is a compact low-metallicity starburst, not a galaxy whose optical light is dominated by an accreting black hole.

desk verdict First resolved rest-optical MRS spectrum of GN-z11: the case against a dominant type 1 AGN is solid, but the low-metallicity starburst label is hostage to an unmeasured electron density. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.12826 v1 pith:WL7YHIFI submitted 2024-12-17 astro-ph.GA

J. Álvarez-Márquez , A. Crespo Gómez , L. Colina , D. Langeroodi , R. Marques-Chaves , C. Prieto-Jiménez , A. Bik , A. Alonso-Herrero
show 16 more authors
L. Boogaard L. Costantin M. García-Marín S. Gillman J. Hjorth E. Iani I. Jermann A. Labiano J. Melinder R. Meyer G. Östlin P.G. Pérez-González P. Rinaldi F. Walter P. van der Werf G. Wright
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords high-redshiftgalaxiesGN-z11MIRIMRSspectroscopystarburstdirectelectron-temperaturemethodAGNdiagnosticsbroad-lineregionfeedback-free
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Using deep JWST MIRI medium-resolution spectroscopy of GN-z11 at redshift 10.6, this paper argues that the galaxy's rest-frame optical emission is powered by a massive, compact, low-metallicity starburst rather than by an accreting supermassive black hole. The resolved [O III] 5008 Å and Hα lines are narrow, with no dominant broad component, and their luminosities would require Eddington ratios above 290 if a type 1 AGN produced them, which the authors call unrealistic. A direct electron-temperature measurement gives 12 + log(O/H) = 7.91 ± 0.07, about 0.17 solar, placing GN-z11 on the mass-metallicity relation at z ∼ 8 and consistent with low-metallicity star-forming galaxies. The authors further speculate that the galaxy is in a feedback-free, highly efficient starburst phase, a scenario they say deeper JWST observations must test.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing evidence is the MRS line-profile measurement: at a spectral resolution of about 86–91 km s⁻¹, both [O III] 5008 Å and Hα are well fit by single narrow Gaussians, with no broad-line-region component. This resolves the kinematics that UV spectroscopy had interpreted as a broad-line region, and, combined with the Hα and [O III] 5008 Å fluxes, it feeds an Eddington-ratio argument against a dominant AGN. The metallicity rests on the O33 ratio, joining the MRS [O III] 5008 Å flux with the published NIRSpec [O III] 4363 Å flux, analysed with the direct electron-temperature method at an assumed electron density of about 1000 cm⁻³.

What would settle it

A deeper MRS spectrum that detects a broad Hα component at FWHM around 430–470 km s⁻¹ with flux above 30% of the total, or an X-ray detection at LX(2–10 keV) near 1–2 × 10⁴⁴ erg s⁻¹, would contradict the claim that no dominant AGN is present. Alternatively, remeasuring [O III] 4363 Å with NIRSpec and checking the MRS-to-NIRSpec flux calibration to better than 5% would test whether the Te = 14000 K and metallicity 7.91 hold; if the O33 ratio changes by more than about 10%, the metallicity shifts by more than the quoted 0.07 dex.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the MRS optical spectrum of GN-z11, specifically the resolved profiles and luminosities of [O III] 5008 Å and Hα, rules out an accreting black hole as the dominant source of the optical continuum and nebular lines. If the measured Hα and [O III] 5008 Å luminosities were produced by a low-redshift-type AGN, the implied Eddington ratios would be 290–440 and the bolometric luminosity would be 17–25 times larger than the UV/optical continuum implies. Instead, line widths of about 189–231 km s⁻¹, a direct-Te metallicity near 0.17 Z☉, and positions on diagnostic diagrams are consistent with a low-metallicity starburst forming stars at 24 ± 3 M☉ yr⁻¹. A weak broad Hα component tracing a minor AGN contribution cannot be excluded at the present sensitivity.

Load-bearing premise

The result depends on combining the MRS [O III] 5008 Å flux with the published NIRSpec [O III] 4363 Å flux without applying any relative flux normalization, so if the two instruments' photometry differ by about 10% or the weak 4363 Å line is uncertain, the electron temperature and metallicity change by more than the stated errors.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the starburst interpretation holds, GN-z11's UV-based AGN indicators trace a stratified, high-density interstellar medium rather than a genuine broad-line region.
  • The starburst interpretation places GN-z11 in line with other compact luminous galaxies at z > 8.5 and with the nearly non-evolving mass-metallicity relation at z > 8.
  • The extreme star-formation and stellar-mass surface densities support, though do not prove, a feedback-free starburst phase that should produce very broad (>1000 km s⁻¹) weak components in both [O III] and Hα from supernova winds.
  • A minor AGN contributing less than 20–30% of the Hα flux remains possible and can be tested with deeper MRS spectroscopy.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If this result generalizes, similar MRS observations of other compact z > 10 galaxies should reveal similarly narrow optical lines and low metallicities, making AGN claims based on UV lines alone less secure.
  • The cross-instrument flux-calibration dependence suggests that future direct-Te metallicity measurements at z > 10 should derive the needed lines from a single instrument or apply an explicit normalization; a 10% relative flux error would shift the metallicity beyond the quoted uncertainty.
  • The feedback-free starburst scenario predicts that deep MRS spectra will show broad wind components in both [O III] and Hα, so a clean null detection of such components would weaken that scenario and favor other explanations for GN-z11's compactness.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents JWST MIRI/MRS medium-resolution spectroscopy of GN-z11 covering the rest-frame optical spectrum, with detections of [O III] 5008 Å and Hα and upper limits on Hβ, [N II], and [S II]. The line profiles are resolved and fitted with single narrow Gaussian components (FWHM ~190 and ~230 km/s), and no dominant broad Hα component is found. Combining these data with published NIRSpec line fluxes, the authors derive line ratios, an electron temperature of 14000±2100 K, a direct-Te metallicity of 12+log(O/H)=7.91±0.07 (0.17 Z_sun), a star formation rate of 24±3 M_sun/yr, and a dynamical mass of ~1e9 M_sun. They argue that the optical nebular emission is powered by a compact, low-metallicity starburst and that a type 1 AGN dominating the optical continuum and emission lines is incompatible with the Hα and [O III] luminosities and line widths, while a weak broad Hα component cannot be excluded. They further speculate that GN-z11 may be undergoing a feedback-free, highly efficient starburst phase.

Significance. If correct, this is a valuable measurement: it places the first rest-frame optical constraints on the ionizing source and gas conditions in GN-z11, a key target in the AGN-versus-starburst debate at z~10. The paper's strengths include the use of multiple independent diagnostics (line widths, Balmer ratios, line-ratio diagrams, luminosity/Eddington arguments), bootstrap-based uncertainties on line fits, and explicit acknowledgment of several caveats. The Eddington-ratio argument against a dominant type 1 AGN is largely independent of the metallicity assumptions and is compelling. However, the low-metallicity starburst conclusion and the mass-metallicity and feedback-free-starburst interpretations rest on a direct-Te measurement that depends on an adopted electron density and on a cross-instrument flux normalization that are not fully propagated into the quoted uncertainties. The central claim is defensible but needs strengthening in these areas.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.4, footnote 2] The electron density used for the direct-Te metallicity is not measured for GN-z11 but assumed to be n_e=1000 cm^-3 from a redshift extrapolation of lower-redshift galaxies. The paper itself states in footnote 2 that if n_e=10^5 cm^-3, the metallicity changes from 0.17 to 0.54 Z_sun, a factor ~3 shift that is far outside the quoted 12+log(O/H)=7.91±0.07. Since the UV lines imply densities above 10^5 cm^-3, this is not a remote alternative. The quoted uncertainties therefore omit the dominant systematic for the metallicity, and the claims of a low-metallicity starburst, the placement on the z~8 mass-metallicity relation, and the feedback-free-starburst interpretation lose their metallicity anchor unless the density dependence is quantified or justified with a density diagnostic.
  2. [§2.4 and §3.4] The O33 ratio combines the MRS [O III] 5008 Å flux with the [O III] 4363 Å flux from the NIRSpec R100 spectrum without any normalization factor, relying on a claimed 5% agreement between NIRSpec and NIRCam. As stated in §2.4, the absolute spectrophotometric uncertainties of NIRSpec (5%) and MRS (10%) are not included. A ~10% shift in the relative flux calibration would change O33=1.77±0.14 by more than its quoted error and would shift the derived Te and metallicity by more than the quoted uncertainties. The significance of the weak [O III] 4363 line in the R100 spectrum is also not re-examined here. The paper should propagate these systematic terms or explicitly justify that they are negligible for the conclusions.
  3. [§3.1 and §4.2] The text contains several garbled passages that obscure the scientific content. In §3.1 the sentence about dust attenuation abruptly reads 'compatible with no, or large Super-Eddington ratios (λE> 29very little, dust attenuation', and in §4.2 the sentence 'At the sensitivity of our MRS spectrum,xy, from the emission of an extremely dense' is corrupted. These appear to be editing artifacts rather than scientific claims, but they should be fixed because they make parts of the argument unreadable.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Table 2] The entries for GHz2 in Table 2 appear garbled ('−105 0.1 −1.0 1 −10 45 −141'); the intended ranges should be formatted consistently with the other rows.
  2. [Figure 4] The caption notes that Hγ is estimated as Hα/5.93 when Hγ data are absent; this assumption should be stated in the main text or figure legend as well, since it affects the comparison with AGN/SFG loci.
  3. [§4.1.2] The statement that the Hα-to-X-ray relation 'does not support' a type 1 AGN is appropriately hedged later, but the sentence could be clarified to distinguish the X-ray-undetected high-z AGN population from the low-z relations used for the comparison.
  4. [Abstract] The abstract states SFR(Hα)=24±3 M_sun/yr without noting that this value assumes a specific metallicity (0.1 Z_sun); the metallicity dependence of the SFR calibration is discussed in §3.1 and could be mentioned for clarity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the derivation chain uses independent measurements and external calibrations, with the FFB scenario explicitly labeled as speculation.

full rationale

The paper's central chain is: MRS [O III]5008 and Halpha fluxes -> line ratios -> O33 = 1.77 +/- 0.14 combined with an adopted electron density ne = 1000 cm^-3 -> Te(O++) = 14000 +/- 2100 K via Pyneb -> direct-Te metallicity 12+log(O/H) = 7.91 +/- 0.07. Each step takes its input from a distinct quantity: the density is taken from an external redshift-evolution relation (Abdurro'uf et al. 2024), not fitted to the metallicity or to GN-z11 itself, and the paper's own footnote 2 discloses that a high-density assumption would move the metallicity to 0.54 Zsun without altering the quoted random errors. That is a robustness limitation, not circularity. The SFR(Halpha) = 24 +/- 3 Msun/yr uses an external 0.1 Zsun calibration, and the AGN-exclusion argument compares the measured Halpha and [O III]5008 luminosities to external low-z AGN scaling relations; the conclusion that a dominating type 1 AGN would require Eddington ratios 290-440 does not reduce to any fitted parameter of this paper. Self-citations (e.g., Alvarez-Marquez et al. 2024 for the dynamical-mass and zeta-ion prescriptions, Langeroodi & Hjorth for mass-size and Te calibrations) are methodological or cross-check relations, not the source of the central starburst claim, and the feedback-free starburst interpretation is explicitly introduced as speculation requiring deeper JWST data. No equation in the paper is equivalent to its own input by construction, and the diagnostic diagrams are used only as supporting evidence with the caveat that AGN models can also reproduce the line ratios.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. It relies on standard astrophysical calibrations and a few adopted parameters (ne, aperture correction, SFR calibration), all clearly stated. The most consequential assumptions are the applicability of low-z AGN scaling relations at z=10.6 and the reliability of the literature [OIII]4363 flux.

free parameters (3)
  • Electron density ne = 1000 cm^-3
    Assumed from the redshift-dependent electron density relation of Abdurro'uf et al. (2024) with no propagated uncertainty; used for Te, ionized gas mass, and Strömgren radius. Te is claimed to be insensitive to ne below 1e5 cm^-3.
  • MRS aperture correction factor = 1.64
    Applied to [O III]5008 and Halpha fluxes to correct for the unresolved source; no uncertainty quoted and the reference is 'Patapis in prep.', so it is an adopted calibration factor.
  • Star formation rate calibration metallicity = 0.1 Zsun (Theios et al. 2019)
    The fiducial SFR(Halpha)=24 Msun/yr corresponds to 0.1 Zsun; values for solar, 0.28, and 0.05 Zsun are also given, showing the SFR depends on this choice.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Case B recombination line ratios at Te=14000K, ne=1000 cm^-3 (Halpha/Hbeta=2.80, etc.)
    Used to derive Hbeta from Halpha and to assess dust extinction in Section 3.1.
  • domain assumption Low-redshift AGN scaling relations (Halpha-BH mass, L(Halpha)-L(5100), L(Halpha)-LX) apply to GN-z11 at z=10.6
    Used in Section 4.1 to argue that an AGN dominating the optical lines would require extreme super-Eddington accretion; if these relations do not hold at z>10, the argument weakens.
  • domain assumption The ionizing photon escape fraction fesc,LyC=0
    Assumed in Section 3.2 to derive log(zeta_ion) from Halpha; previous estimates are 0.024-0.11, so this introduces up to 0.05 dex uncertainty.
  • domain assumption The [O III]5008 line width traces virialized motion within Re=64 pc
    Assumed in Section 3.5 to derive dynamical mass of 1.1e9 Msun; a rotational or outflowing component would invalidate the mass estimate.
  • domain assumption The redshift-dependent electron density relation of Abdurro'uf et al. (2024) applies to GN-z11
    Sets ne=1000 cm^-3; based on lower-redshift evolution and used for Te and ionized gas mass.
  • standard math Direct-Te method with Pyneb atomic data and assumption that O+/H+ + O++/H+ is the total oxygen abundance
    Used in Section 3.4 to derive metallicity; O+++ contribution is assumed negligible based on Berg et al.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Insight into the Starburst Nature of Galaxy GN-z11 with JWST MIRI Spectroscopy." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WL7YHIFI

@misc{pith2026241212826,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Insight into the Starburst Nature of Galaxy GN-z11 with JWST MIRI Spectroscopy},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WL7YHIFI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.12826}
}
abstract

This paper presents a deep MIRI/JWST medium resolution spectroscopy (MRS) covering the rest-frame optical spectrum of the GN-z11 galaxy. The [OIII]5008 and H$\alpha$ emission lines are detected and spectroscopically resolved. The line profiles are well-modeled by a narrow Gaussian component with intrinsic FWHMs of 189$\pm$25 and 231$\pm$52 kms$^{-1}$, respectively. We do not find any evidence of a dominant broad H$\alpha$ emission line component tracing a Broad Line Region in a type 1 active galactic nuclei (AGN). However, a broad ($\sim$430-470 kms$^{-1}$) and weak ($<$ 20-30%) H$\alpha$ line component, tracing a minor AGN contribution in the optical, cannot be ruled out completely with the sensitivity of the present data. The physical and excitation properties of the ionized gas are consistent with a low-metallicity starburst forming stars at a rate of SFR(H$\alpha$)$=$24 $\pm$3$M_{\odot}$yr$^{-1}$. The electron temperature of the ionized gas is $T_{\mathrm{e}}$(O$^{++}$)$=$14000$\pm$2100K, while the direct-$T_{\mathrm{e}}$ gas-phase metallicity is 12+$\log$(O/H)$=$7.91$\pm$0.07 (Z=0.17$\pm$0.03Z$_{\odot}$). The optical line ratios locate GN-z11 in the starburst or AGN region but more consistent with those of local low-metallicity starbursts and high-$z$ luminous galaxies detected at redshifts similar to GN-z11. We conclude that the MRS optical spectrum of GN-z11 is consistent with that of a massive, compact, and low-metallicity starburst galaxy. Due to its high SFR and stellar mass surface densities, close to that of the densest stellar clusters, we speculate that GN-z11 could be undergoing a feedback-free, highly efficient starburst phase. Additional JWST data are needed to validate this scenario, and other recently proposed alternatives, to explain the existence of bright compact galaxies in the early Universe.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.12826 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. MRS [O III]5008Å (left) and Hα (right) emission line maps. The [O III] 5008Å and Hα line maps are generated by integrating a narrow velocity range, −150 < v [km s−1 ] < 150, around the peak of each emis￾sion line. Cyan dashed circles are the aperture chosen to extract the 1D spectra. The gray area represents the MRS spatial resolution (PSF FWHM) at the observed wavelength of each emission line. These line maps demon… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. View of the rest-frame optical spectrum of GN-z11 by zooming in the Hβ, [O III] 4960,5008Å, and Hα emission lines. Back continuous line: 1D extracted MRS spectrum. Gray area: ±1σ noise calculated from the standard deviation of the local background. Red area: spectral range used to calculate the integrated line flux. Black vertical dashed line: wavelength of the peak of each emission line considering a redshift of 10… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. MRS [O III] 5008Å and Hα emission line fits. Left and right panels shows the one-component Gaussian fits, together with the fit residuals, for the [O III] 5008Å and Hα emission lines, respectively. Back continuous line: 1D extracted MRS spectrum. Gray area: ±1σ uncertainty calcu￾lated from the standard deviation of the local background. Green dashed line: one-components Gaussian function that best fits the spectra. … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Line ratio diagrams. This figure shows the position of GN-z11 (red star) on the R2 −R3, R23 − O32, O32 − O3Hγ and O32 − O33 diagrams. JWST-detected z > 8 galaxies are represented as filled circles. Blue and red markers represent the high-z SFGs and type 1 AGNs from dif…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Mass-metallicity diagram for z > 7 galaxies. The large red star shows the measured stellar mass and gas-phase metallicity for GN-z11. The colored circles show the location of the remaining z > 9 galaxies, compiled from the literature: MACS1149-JD1 (Stiavelli et al. 202…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Mass-radius relation for GN-z11 including young star clusters in nearby starbursts (NGC253, Leroy et al. 2018; M82, McCrady et al. 2003; McCrady & Graham 2007), low-z blue compact (ESO338-IG04, Östlin et al. 2007) and low-metallicity (SBS0335-052E, Adamo et al. 2010) g…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 10 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SPURS: Massive Stars, Dense Gas, and Ly$\alpha$ Escape in GN-z11 at $z = 10.6$

    astro-ph.GA 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    GN-z11's rest-UV spectrum shows young massive stars with very massive star winds, dense gas, and a broad red Ly alpha wing that may help Ly alpha escape the largely neutral early universe.

  2. Unveiling and Characterising Ubiquitous Nitrogen Enhancement in $6 \leq z \leq 10$ Galaxies with JWST Spectroscopy

    astro-ph.GA 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Stacked JWST/NIRSpec spectra of 135 z=6-10 galaxies show supersolar N/O that is highest after a star-formation lull, consistent with delayed AGB enrichment and pristine gas inflows.

  3. Why is GN-z11 Bright, Compact, and Nitrogen Enhanced? Insights from UV Absorption and Emission Diagnostics

    astro-ph.GA 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The UV continuum of the early galaxy GN-z11 is dominated by massive stars, and its extreme nitrogen enhancement is likely localized to dense gas enriched by stellar winds.

  4. SAPPHIRES: Extremely Metal-Poor Galaxy Candidates with $12+{\rm log(O/H)}<7.0$ at $z\sim5-7$ from Deep JWST/NIRCam Grism Observations

    astro-ph.GA 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Seven candidate galaxies at z~5-7 show [OIII]/Hbeta ratios implying metallicities below 2% solar, with two below 1% solar, potentially breaking the high-redshift metallicity floor.

  5. JADES NIRSpec Spectroscopy of GN-z11: Evidence for Wolf-Rayet contribution to stellar populations at 430 Myr after Big Bang?

    astro-ph.GA 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Wolf-Rayet star models reproduce GN-z11's position in ultraviolet diagnostic diagrams but under-predict the observed N III/O III] ratio, so extra nitrogen enrichment is needed.

  6. Morphological Demographics of Galaxies at $z\sim 10-16$: Log-Normal Size Distribution and Exponential Profiles Consistent with the Disk Formation Scenario

    astro-ph.GA 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Galaxies at z=10-16 have a log-normal size distribution with sigma 0.52, nearly uniform axis ratios, and exponential profiles, consistent with early disk formation.

  7. Exploring the mysterious high-ionization source powering [Ne V] in high-z analog SBS0335-052 E with JWST/MIRI

    astro-ph.GA 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    JWST MIRI maps of SBS 0335-052 E reveal [Ne V] emission that standard star-formation, X-ray binary, and shock models cannot reproduce, favoring a partial 10^5 solar-mass accreting black hole.

  8. Deep Constraints on [CII]158$\mu$m in JADES-GS-z14-0: Further Evidence for a Galaxy with Low Gas Content at z=14.2

    astro-ph.GA 2025-02 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Deep ALMA observations fail to detect [CII] 158 μm emission from the z=14.18 galaxy JADES-GS-z14-0, indicating an [OIII]/[CII] ratio above 3.5 and extreme ISM conditions with low gas content.

  9. Deep Spectroscopic Follow-Up of Maisie's Galaxy -- A Typical Galaxy in the Early Universe

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Deep JWST spectroscopy of Maisie's Galaxy at z=11.4 reveals moderate star formation, metallicity, and ionization consistent with a typical galaxy on the early star-formation main sequence rather than an extreme source.

  10. CAPERS Observations of Two UV-Bright Galaxies at z>10. More Evidence for Bursting Star Formation in the Early Universe

    astro-ph.GA 2025-04 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    JWST confirms two bright galaxies at z=10.56 and z=11.01 and finds that most bright z>10 galaxies show signs of a recent starburst, with a median SFR10/SFR100 around 2.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

143 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages · cited by 10 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    L., Coe, D., et al

    Abdurro’uf, Larson, R. L., Coe, D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 973, 47

    2024

  2. [2]

    J., Rigby, J

    Acharyya, A., Kewley, L. J., Rigby, J. R., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 488, 5862

    2019

  3. [3]

    D., Vanzella, E., et al

    Adamo, A., Bradley, L. D., Vanzella, E., et al. 2024, Nature, 632, 513

    2024

  4. [4]

    2010, ApJ, 725, 1620 Álvarez-Márquez, J., Colina, L., Crespo Gómez, A., et al

    Adamo, A., Zackrisson, E., Östlin, G., & Hayes, M. 2010, ApJ, 725, 1620 Álvarez-Márquez, J., Colina, L., Crespo Gómez, A., et al. 2024, A&A, 686, A85 Álvarez-Márquez, J., Colina, L., Marques-Chaves, R., et al. 2019, A&A, 629, A9 Álvarez-Márquez, J., Crespo Gómez, A., Colina, L., et al. 2023, A&A, 671, A105

    2010

  5. [5]

    T., Bogdán, Á., Kovács, O

    Ananna, T. T., Bogdán, Á., Kovács, O. E., Natarajan, P., & Hickox, R. C. 2024, ApJ, 969, L18

    2024

  6. [6]

    Andrews, B. H. & Thompson, T. A. 2011, ApJ, 727, 97

    2011

  7. [7]

    R., et al

    Argyriou, I., Glasse, A., Law, D. R., et al. 2023, A&A, 675, A111 Arrabal Haro, P., Dickinson, M., Finkelstein, S. L., et al. 2023, ApJ, 951, L22

    2023

  8. [8]

    J., & Scott, P

    Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., & Scott, P. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 481

    2009

Show all 143 references
  1. [9]

    J., Oesch, P., et al

    Atek, H., Furtak, L. J., Oesch, P., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 511, 4464

    2022

  2. [10]

    J., et al

    Atek, H., Labbé, I., Furtak, L. J., et al. 2024, Nature, 626, 975

    2024

  3. [11]

    A., Phillips, M

    Baldwin, J. A., Phillips, M. M., & Terlevich, R. 1981, PASP, 93, 5

    1981

  4. [12]

    A., Chisholm, J., Erb, D

    Berg, D. A., Chisholm, J., Erb, D. K., et al. 2021, ApJ, 922, 170

    2021

  5. [13]

    A., Erb, D

    Berg, D. A., Erb, D. K., Auger, M. W., Pettini, M., & Brammer, G. B. 2018, ApJ, 859, 164

    2018

  6. [14]

    A., Erb, D

    Berg, D. A., Erb, D. K., Henry, R. B. C., Skillman, E. D., & McQuinn, K. B. W. 2019, ApJ, 874, 93

    2019

  7. [15]

    2024, A&A, 686, A141

    Bhatt, M., Gallerani, S., Ferrara, A., et al. 2024, A&A, 686, A141

    2024

  8. [16]

    J., & Dopita, M

    Bian, F., Kewley, L. J., & Dopita, M. A. 2018, ApJ, 859, 175

    2018

  9. [17]

    Bosman, S. E. I., Álvarez-Márquez, J., Colina, L., et al. 2024, Nature Astronomy [arXiv:2307.14414]

    2024 arXiv

  10. [18]

    J., Curtis-Lake, E., et al

    Boyett, K., Bunker, A. J., Curtis-Lake, E., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2401.16934 Bradaˇc, M., Strait, V ., Mowla, L., et al. 2024, ApJ, 961, L21

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    2022, astropy/photutils: 1.5.0

    Bradley, L., Sip˝ocz, B., Robitaille, T., et al. 2022, astropy/photutils: 1.5.0

    2022

  12. [20]

    J., Saxena, A., Cameron, A

    Bunker, A. J., Saxena, A., Cameron, A. J., et al. 2023, A&A, 677, A88

    2023

  13. [21]

    2024, JWST Calibration Pipeline

    Bushouse, H., Eisenhamer, J., Dencheva, N., et al. 2024, JWST Calibration Pipeline

    2024

  14. [22]

    A., et al

    Calabro, A., Castellano, M., Zavala, J. A., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2403.12683

    2024 arXiv

  15. [23]

    2013, in Secular Evolution of Galaxies, ed

    Calzetti, D. 2013, in Secular Evolution of Galaxies, ed. J. Falcón-Barroso & J. H. Knapen, 419

    2013

  16. [24]

    1986, MNRAS, 223, 811

    Campbell, A., Terlevich, R., & Melnick, J. 1986, MNRAS, 223, 811

    1986

  17. [25]

    2024a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.20533

    Carniani, S., D’Eugenio, F., Ji, X., et al. 2024a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.20533

    arXiv

  18. [26]

    2024b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.18485

    Carniani, S., Hainline, K., D’Eugenio, F., et al. 2024b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.18485

    arXiv

  19. [27]

    2023, A&A, 675, A121

    Castellano, M., Belfiori, D., Pentericci, L., et al. 2023, A&A, 675, A121

    2023

  20. [28]

    2024, ApJ, 972, 143

    Castellano, M., Napolitano, L., Fontana, A., et al. 2024, ApJ, 972, 143

    2024

  21. [29]

    2003, PASP, 115, 763

    Chabrier, G. 2003, PASP, 115, 763

    2003

  22. [30]

    2023, A&A, 673, L7

    Charbonnel, C., Schaerer, D., Prantzos, N., et al. 2023, A&A, 673, L7

    2023

  23. [31]

    2022, MNRAS, 517, 5104

    Chisholm, J., Saldana-Lopez, A., Flury, S., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 517, 5104

    2022

  24. [32]

    2023, MNRAS, 520, 2180

    Claeyssens, A., Adamo, A., Richard, J., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 520, 2180

    2023

  25. [33]

    M., Krumholz, M

    Crocker, R. M., Krumholz, M. R., Thompson, T. A., Baumgardt, H., & Mackey, D. 2018, MNRAS, 481, 4895

    2018

  26. [34]

    2023, MNRAS, 518, 425

    Curti, M., D’Eugenio, F., Carniani, S., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 518, 425

    2023

  27. [35]

    2024b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.02575

    Curti, M., Witstok, J., Jakobsen, P., et al. 2024b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.02575

    arXiv

  28. [36]

    2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 622 D’Antona, F., Vesperini, E., Calura, F., et al

    Curtis-Lake, E., Carniani, S., Cameron, A., et al. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 622 D’Antona, F., Vesperini, E., Calura, F., et al. 2023, A&A, 680, L19

    2023

  29. [37]

    C., Birnboim, Y ., Mandelker, N., & Li, Z

    Dekel, A., Sarkar, K. C., Birnboim, Y ., Mandelker, N., & Li, Z. 2023, MNRAS, 523, 3201 Díaz, A. I., Castellanos, M., Terlevich, E., & Luisa García-Vargas, M. 2000, MNRAS, 318, 462

    2023

  30. [38]

    Dopita, M. A. & Sutherland, R. S. 2003, Astrophysics of the diffuse universe

    2003

  31. [39]

    Dors, O. L. 2021, MNRAS, 507, 466

    2021

  32. [40]

    2023, MNRAS, 522, 3986

    Ferrara, A., Pallottini, A., & Dayal, P. 2023, MNRAS, 522, 3986

    2023

  33. [41]

    L., Bagley, M

    Finkelstein, S. L., Bagley, M. B., Ferguson, H. C., et al. 2023, ApJ, 946, L13

    2023

  34. [42]

    2023, ApJ, 943, L27

    Fiore, F., Ferrara, A., Bischetti, M., Feruglio, C., & Travascio, A. 2023, ApJ, 943, L27

    2023

  35. [43]

    A., Walter, F., et al

    Fudamoto, Y ., Oesch, P. A., Walter, F., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 530, 340

    2024

  36. [44]

    2023, ApJ, 949, L25

    Fujimoto, S., Arrabal Haro, P., Dickinson, M., et al. 2023, ApJ, 949, L25

    2023

  37. [45]

    J., Labbé, I., Zitrin, A., et al

    Furtak, L. J., Labbé, I., Zitrin, A., et al. 2024, Nature, 628, 57

    2024

  38. [46]

    Garcia, F. A. B., Ricotti, M., Sugimura, K., & Park, J. 2023, MNRAS, 522, 2495

    2023

  39. [47]

    P., Mather, J

    Gardner, J. P., Mather, J. C., Abbott, R., et al. 2023, PASP, 135, 068001 Giménez-Arteaga, C., Fujimoto, S., Valentino, F., et al. 2024, A&A, 686, A63

    2023

  40. [48]

    E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A

    Greene, J. E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A. D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 964, 39 Grudi´c, M. Y ., Hopkins, P. F., Quataert, E., & Murray, N. 2019, MNRAS, 483, 5548

    2024

  41. [49]

    Hayes, M. J. & Scarlata, C. 2023, ApJ, 954, L14

    2023

  42. [50]

    E., Brammer, G

    Heintz, K. E., Brammer, G. B., Giménez-Arteaga, C., et al. 2023, Nature Astron- omy, 7, 1517

    2023

  43. [51]

    M., Rieke, G

    Helton, J. M., Rieke, G. H., Alberts, S., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.18462

    2024 arXiv

  44. [52]

    C., Feigelson, E

    Ho, L. C., Feigelson, E. D., Townsley, L. K., et al. 2001, ApJ, 549, L51

    2001

  45. [53]

    A., Riechers, D., Decarli, R., et al

    Hodge, J. A., Riechers, D., Decarli, R., et al. 2015, ApJ, 798, L18

    2015

  46. [54]

    F., Murray, N., Quataert, E., & Thompson, T

    Hopkins, P. F., Murray, N., Quataert, E., & Thompson, T. A. 2010, MNRAS, 401, L19

    2010

  47. [55]

    Y .-Y ., Coe, D., Abdurro’uf, et al

    Hsiao, T. Y .-Y ., Coe, D., Abdurro’uf, et al. 2023, ApJ, 949, L34

    2023

  48. [56]

    I., et al

    Iani, E., Rinaldi, P., Caputi, K. I., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2406.18207

    2024 arXiv

  49. [57]

    I., Guseva, N

    Izotov, Y . I., Guseva, N. G., Fricke, K. J., & Henkel, C. 2019, A&A, 623, A40

    2019

  50. [58]

    I., Schaerer, D., Thuan, T

    Izotov, Y . I., Schaerer, D., Thuan, T. X., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 461, 3683

    2016

  51. [59]

    I., Stasi´nska, G., Meynet, G., Guseva, N

    Izotov, Y . I., Stasi´nska, G., Meynet, G., Guseva, N. G., & Thuan, T. X. 2006, A&A, 448, 955

    2006

  52. [60]

    Izotov, Y . I. & Thuan, T. X. 2011, ApJ, 734, 82

    2011

  53. [61]

    I., Thuan, T

    Izotov, Y . I., Thuan, T. X., & Guseva, N. G. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 3486

    2024

  54. [62]

    2024a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.05772

    Ji, X., Maiolino, R., Ferland, G., et al. 2024a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.05772

    arXiv

  55. [63]

    2024b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.04148

    Ji, X., Übler, H., Maiolino, R., et al. 2024b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.04148

    arXiv

  56. [64]

    2012, MNRAS, 422, 3268

    Jin, C., Ward, M., & Done, C. 2012, MNRAS, 422, 3268

    2012

  57. [65]

    C., Álvarez-Márquez, J., Sloan, G

    Jones, O. C., Álvarez-Márquez, J., Sloan, G. C., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 523, 2519 Juodžbalis, I., Maiolino, R., Baker, W. M., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2403.03872

    2023 arXiv

  58. [66]

    M., Tremonti, C., et al

    Kauffmann, G., Heckman, T. M., Tremonti, C., et al. 2003, MNRAS, 346, 1055

    2003

  59. [67]

    Kennicutt, R. C. & Evans, N. J. 2012, ARA&A, 50, 531

    2012

  60. [68]

    J., Dopita, M

    Kewley, L. J., Dopita, M. A., Sutherland, R. S., Heisler, C. A., & Trevena, J. 2001, ApJ, 556, 121

    2001

  61. [69]

    & Ferrara, A

    Kobayashi, C. & Ferrara, A. 2024, ApJ, 962, L6

    2024

  62. [70]

    D., Barro, G., McGrath, E

    Kocevski, D. D., Barro, G., McGrath, E. J., et al. 2023, ApJ, 946, L14

    2023

  63. [71]

    2023, ApJ, 957, L7

    Kokorev, V ., Fujimoto, S., Labbe, I., et al. 2023, ApJ, 957, L7

    2023

  64. [72]

    & Harikane, Y

    Kokubo, M. & Harikane, Y . 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.04777

    2024

  65. [73]

    Krause, M. G. H., Charbonnel, C., Bastian, N., & Diehl, R. 2016, A&A, 587, A53

    2016

  66. [74]

    2021, A&A, 656, A57

    Labiano, A., Argyriou, I., Álvarez-Márquez, J., et al. 2021, A&A, 656, A57

    2021

  67. [75]

    & Hjorth, J

    Langeroodi, D. & Hjorth, J. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2307.06336

    2023 arXiv

  68. [76]

    & Hjorth, J

    Langeroodi, D. & Hjorth, J. 2024a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.07455

  69. [77]

    & Hjorth, J

    Langeroodi, D. & Hjorth, J. 2024b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.13045

    arXiv

  70. [78]

    2023, ApJ, 957, 39

    Langeroodi, D., Hjorth, J., Chen, W., et al. 2023, ApJ, 957, 39

    2023

  71. [79]

    H., Maseda, M

    Laseter, I. H., Maseda, M. V ., Curti, M., et al. 2024, A&A, 681, A70

    2024

  72. [80]

    D., Morrison, J

    Law, D. D., Morrison, J. E., Argyriou, I., et al. 2023, AJ, 166, 45

    2023

  73. [81]

    Le, H. A. N., Xue, Y ., Lin, X., & Wang, Y . 2023, ApJ, 945, 59

    2023

  74. [82]

    K., Bolatto, A

    Leroy, A. K., Bolatto, A. D., Ostriker, E. C., et al. 2018, ApJ, 869, 126

    2018

  75. [83]

    C., et al

    Li, Z., Dekel, A., Sarkar, K. C., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2311.14662

    2023 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Luridiana, V ., Morisset, C., & Shaw, R. A. 2015, A&A, 573, A42

    2015

  77. [85]

    F., Faucher-Giguère, C.-A., et al

    Ma, X., Hopkins, P. F., Faucher-Giguère, C.-A., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 456, 2140

    2016

  78. [86]

    2024a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.00504

    Maiolino, R., Risaliti, G., Signorini, M., et al. 2024a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.00504

    arXiv

  79. [87]

    2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2308.01230

    Maiolino, R., Scholtz, J., Curtis-Lake, E., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2308.01230

    2023 arXiv

  80. [88]

    2024, MNRAS, 533, 2488

    Marconcini, C., D’Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 533, 2488

    2024

  81. [89]

    C., & Feldmann, R

    Marszewski, A., Sun, G., Faucher-Giguère, C.-A., Hayward, C. C., & Feldmann, R. 2024, ApJ, 967, L41

    2024

  82. [90]

    2023, A&A, 672, A155

    Mascia, S., Pentericci, L., Calabrò, A., et al. 2023, A&A, 672, A155

    2023

  83. [91]

    D., Schramm, M., et al

    Matsuoka, K., Silverman, J. D., Schramm, M., et al. 2013, ApJ, 771, 64

    2013

  84. [92]

    A., et al

    Matthee, J., Mackenzie, R., Simcoe, R. A., et al. 2023, ApJ, 950, 67

    2023

  85. [93]

    2017, MNRAS, 465, 3637 Article number, page 16 of 17 J

    Matthee, J., Sobral, D., Best, P., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 465, 3637 Article number, page 16 of 17 J. Álvarez-Márquez et al.: Insights into the Nature of GN-z11

    2017

  86. [94]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.10811

    Mazzolari, G., Übler, H., Maiolino, R., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.10811

    2024 arXiv

  87. [95]

    M., & Graham, J

    McCrady, N., Gilbert, A. M., & Graham, J. R. 2003, ApJ, 596, 240

    2003

  88. [96]

    & Graham, J

    McCrady, N. & Graham, J. R. 2007, ApJ, 663, 844

    2007

  89. [97]

    2019, MNRAS, 487, 4238

    Messa, M., Adamo, A., Östlin, G., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 487, 4238

    2019

  90. [98]

    A., Oesch, P

    Meyer, R. A., Oesch, P. A., Giovinazzo, E., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.05111

    2024 arXiv

  91. [99]

    L., Arellano-Córdova, K

    Mingozzi, M., James, B. L., Arellano-Córdova, K. Z., et al. 2022, ApJ, 939, 110

    2022

  92. [100]

    2023, ApJ, 947, L24

    Morishita, T., Roberts-Borsani, G., Treu, T., et al. 2023, ApJ, 947, L24

    2023

  93. [101]

    2024b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2402.14084

    Morishita, T., Stiavelli, M., Grillo, C., et al. 2024b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2402.14084

    arXiv

  94. [102]

    2023, ApJS, 269, 33

    Nakajima, K., Ouchi, M., Isobe, Y ., et al. 2023, ApJS, 269, 33

    2023

  95. [103]

    2022, ApJS, 262, 3

    Nakajima, K., Ouchi, M., Xu, Y ., et al. 2022, ApJS, 262, 3

    2022

  96. [104]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.14470

    Nakane, M., Ouchi, M., Nakajima, K., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.14470

    2024 arXiv

  97. [105]

    I., Iani, E., et al

    Navarro-Carrera, R., Caputi, K. I., Iani, E., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.14201

    2024 arXiv

  98. [106]

    2019, MNRAS, 488, 5185

    Netzer, H. 2019, MNRAS, 488, 5185

    2019

  99. [107]

    A., Bouwens, R

    Oesch, P. A., Bouwens, R. J., Illingworth, G. D., et al. 2014, ApJ, 786, 108

    2014

  100. [108]

    A., Brammer, G., van Dokkum, P

    Oesch, P. A., Brammer, G., van Dokkum, P. G., et al. 2016, ApJ, 819, 129 Östlin, G., Cumming, R. J., & Bergvall, N. 2007, A&A, 461, 471

    2016

  101. [109]

    J., Dunne, L., et al

    Oteo, I., Ivison, R. J., Dunne, L., et al. 2016, ApJ, 827, 34

    2016

  102. [110]

    C., Estrada-Carpenter, V ., et al

    Papovich, C., Simons, R. C., Estrada-Carpenter, V ., et al. 2022, ApJ, 937, 22

    2022

  103. [111]

    F., & Tsang, B

    Pascale, M., Dai, L., McKee, C. F., & Tsang, B. T. H. 2023, ApJ, 957, 77

    2023

  104. [112]

    C., & Brotherton, M

    Pennell, A., Runnoe, J. C., & Brotherton, M. S. 2017, MNRAS, 468, 1433

    2017

  105. [113]

    2024, A&A, 685, L13 Pérez-González, P

    Pereira-Santaella, M., García-Bernete, I., González-Alfonso, E., et al. 2024, A&A, 685, L13 Pérez-González, P. G., Barro, G., Rieke, G. H., et al. 2024, ApJ, 968, 4 Pérez-González, P. G., Costantin, L., Langeroodi, D., et al. 2023, ApJ, 951, L1 Pérez-Montero, E. 2017, PASP, 12...

    2024

  106. [114]

    A., Shapley, A

    Reddy, N. A., Shapley, A. E., Sanders, R. L., et al. 2018, ApJ, 869, 92

    2018

  107. [115]

    A., Topping, M

    Reddy, N. A., Topping, M. W., Shapley, A. E., et al. 2022, ApJ, 926, 31

    2022

  108. [116]

    H., Wright, G

    Rieke, G. H., Wright, G. S., Böker, T., et al. 2015, PASP, 127, 584

    2015

  109. [117]

    2023, PASP, 135, 048001

    Rigby, J., Perrin, M., McElwain, M., et al. 2023, PASP, 135, 048001

    2023

  110. [118]

    I., Costantin, L., et al

    Rinaldi, P., Caputi, K. I., Costantin, L., et al. 2023, ApJ, 952, 143

    2023

  111. [119]

    I., Iani, E., et al

    Rinaldi, P., Caputi, K. I., Iani, E., et al. 2024, ApJ, 969, 12

    2024

  112. [120]

    E., Tacchella, S., Johnson, B

    Robertson, B. E., Tacchella, S., Johnson, B. D., et al. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 611 Sánchez-García, M., Pereira-Santaella, M., García-Burillo, S., et al. 2022, A&A, 659, A102

    2023

  113. [121]

    L., Shapley, A

    Sanders, R. L., Shapley, A. E., Topping, M. W., Reddy, N. A., & Brammer, G. B. 2024, ApJ, 962, 24

    2024

  114. [122]

    2024, A&A, 687, L11

    Schaerer, D., Marques-Chaves, R., Xiao, M., & Korber, D. 2024, A&A, 687, L11

    2024

  115. [123]

    2024, Discovery of a new N-emitter in the epoch of reionization

    Schaerer, D., Marques-Chaves, R., Xiao, M., & Korber, D. 2024, Discovery of a new N-emitter in the epoch of reionization

    2024

  116. [124]

    P., et al

    Senchyna, P., Plat, A., Stark, D. P., et al. 2024, ApJ, 966, 92

    2024

  117. [125]

    T., Strauss, M

    Shen, Y ., Richards, G. T., Strauss, M. A., et al. 2011, ApJS, 194, 45

    2011

  118. [126]

    2024, MNRAS, 527, 6139

    Simmonds, C., Tacchella, S., Hainline, K., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 6139

    2024

  119. [127]

    J., Labbé, I., et al

    Smit, R., Bouwens, R. J., Labbé, I., et al. 2016, ApJ, 833, 254

    2016

  120. [128]

    2023, ApJ, 957, L18

    Stiavelli, M., Morishita, T., Chiaberge, M., et al. 2023, ApJ, 957, L18

    2023

  121. [129]

    J., Hainline, K., et al

    Tacchella, S., Eisenstein, D. J., Hainline, K., et al. 2023, ApJ, 952, 74

    2023

  122. [130]

    P., Chen, Z., et al

    Tang, M., Stark, D. P., Chen, Z., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 526, 1657

    2023

  123. [131]

    L., Steidel, C

    Theios, R. L., Steidel, C. C., Strom, A. L., et al. 2019, ApJ, 871, 128

    2019

  124. [132]

    A., Quataert, E., & Murray, N

    Thompson, T. A., Quataert, E., & Murray, N. 2005, ApJ, 630, 167

    2005

  125. [133]

    W., Stark, D

    Topping, M. W., Stark, D. P., Senchyna, P., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 529, 3301 Übler, H., Maiolino, R., Pérez-González, P. G., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 531, 355

    2024

  126. [134]

    2023, MNRAS, 518, 3557

    Ucci, G., Dayal, P., Hutter, A., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 518, 3557

    2023

  127. [135]

    2022, A&A, 659, A2

    Vanzella, E., Castellano, M., Bergamini, P., et al. 2022, A&A, 659, A2

    2022

  128. [136]

    & Osmer, P

    Vestergaard, M. & Osmer, P. S. 2009, ApJ, 699, 800

    2009

  129. [137]

    W., Glasse, A., et al

    Wells, M., Pel, J. W., Glasse, A., et al. 2015, PASP, 127, 646

    2015

  130. [138]

    L., Chen, W., et al

    Williams, H., Kelly, P. L., Chen, W., et al. 2023, Science, 380, 416

    2023

  131. [139]

    S., Rieke, G

    Wright, G. S., Rieke, G. H., Glasse, A., et al. 2023, PASP, 135, 048003

    2023

  132. [140]

    S., Wright, D., Goodson, G

    Wright, G. S., Wright, D., Goodson, G. B., et al. 2015, PASP, 127, 595

    2015

  133. [141]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.16963

    Xu, Y ., Ouchi, M., Yajima, H., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.16963

    2024 arXiv

  134. [142]

    A., Castellano, M., Akins, H

    Zavala, J. A., Castellano, M., Akins, H. B., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2403.10491

    2024 arXiv

  135. [143]

    2023, MNRAS, 520, 2445 1 Centro de Astrobiología (CAB), CSIC-INTA, Ctra

    Ziparo, F., Ferrara, A., Sommovigo, L., & Kohandel, M. 2023, MNRAS, 520, 2445 1 Centro de Astrobiología (CAB), CSIC-INTA, Ctra. de Ajalvir km 4, Torrejón de Ardoz, E-28850, Madrid, Spain e-mail: jalvarez@cab.inta-csic.es 2 Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI), 3700 San Ma...

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.